" Swine Flu " Vaccination : Transparency Criticizes Potential Conflicts of Interest and Non-Transparent Decision -Making Processes at the Permanent Vaccination Commission STIKO 14.09.2009 Berlin, 14.09.2009 - The anti- corruption organization Transparency International Germany is calling for disclosure of the decision-making processes of the Permanent Vaccination Commission (STIKO) in light of the increasing uncertainty among the population regarding the planned vaccination against swine flu . Angela Spelsberg, board member of Transparency Germany: "The current public debate confirms our years of criticism : intransparency and potential conflicts of interest undermine credibility and, in the current case , feed the suspicion that the H1N1 flu wave is being used as a swine flu pandemic by the pharmaceutical industry for marketing purposes ." The existing mechanisms to ensure the independence of the decisions of the Standing Commission on Vaccination (STIKO), especially with regard to the disclosure of conflicts of interest , are considered insufficient . Furthermore , it is to be criticized that , in accordance with the STIKO's rules of procedure , the minutes of the meetings and the decisions , and above all their justifications , are not published as a matter of principle . Since August 2008, the members of STIKO have disclosed their potential conflicts of interest on the STIKO website after years of urging , also by Transparency Germany. This is worthy of recognition as a first step . The current information from March 2009 shows that the majority of the current 16 members have more or less intensive contacts , including paid activities , with the most important manufacturers of vaccines . Furthermore , it can be read that some of the STIKO members are involved in the "Forum Impfen", which in turn enjoys financial support from the company Sanofi-Pasteur-MSD (SPMSD), among others . The website of the "Forum Impfen" gives no indication of the financial amount of this support. In view of the high level of uncertainty in the population and also in the medical profession about the necessity and risks of vaccination , a professional and independent recommendation by specialists is indispensable for confidence -building. This must be ensured through full disclosure and the avoidance of any impression of influence by the pharmaceutical industry . The German government has also failed to make the basis of its experts ' decisions comprehensible and transparent to the - scientific - public . The vaccine was approved by the European regulatory authority EMEA, whose work Transparency Deutschland has been observing extremely critically for years . Both the subordination of the EMEA to the Directorate -General for Economic Affairs and not to the Directorate -General for Health and Consumer Protection (DG Sanco ) of the European Commission , as well as its financing to almost two-thirds by the pharmaceutical industry , are regarded as highly problematic , especially since a review of the approval documents by external scientists is generally only possible after approval has been granted . Contact Dr. Angela Spelsberg, Member of the Board Dr. Christian Humborg , Managing Director Transparency International Germany e.V. Tel.: 030 / 54 98 98 0 Further information on the facts of the case : 1. on May 1, 2009, Professor Sir Roy Anderson, as an advisor to the British government , rector of Imperial College London, and member of the Scientific Advisory Council for Emergencies (SAGE), referred to the cases of swine flu as a pandemic outbreak in a radio interview . The July 27, 2009, online edition of the Daily Mail reported that the government advisor has been on the payroll of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for years with a salary of 135,000 euros . The shares of this vaccine manufacturer rose considerably immediately after the " swine flu pandemic " was declared . 2. On June 11, 2009, Ms. Chan, the Director -General of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva, declared swine flu a pandemic , triggering corresponding action in all WHO member countries. Ms. Chan's relationship with the pharmaceutical industry has not been without controversy since she severely criticized the government of Thailand for granting compulsory licenses for low-cost AIDS drugs when she took office in 2007 (Bangkok Post, February 2, 2007; www.bangkokpost.com). 3. the federal government and its advisors support the WHO's position , as they are obliged to do under the pandemic declaration . They have ordered 50 million doses of vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline, worth 700 million euros , to be paid for by the contributions of those with statutory health insurance and by taxpayers . However , neither the STIKO nor the German government have publicly informed the public that H1N1 is a known virus that was already introduced into the USA in the 1970s as the so- called Asian swine flu by Vietnamese soldiers . Because the virus spread rapidly at that time, about forty million U.S. citizens were vaccinated until 1976. Then vaccination was discontinued because infection with the virus was usually so mild and free of complications that the rare complications of the vaccine , such as Guillain-Barré syndrome , weighed more heavily (Washington Times, April 27, 2009). 4 So far , the viral infection in Germany has also shown this benign course . While in a usual flu season in Germany about 10,000 deaths are to be expected , i.e. 50 deaths per day , so far no fatal courses have been documented in our country . 5 The vaccine is approved by the European regulatory authority EMEA, whose working methods Transparency Deutschland last described in its "Scheinwerfer" ( No . 43, April 2009, Focus on Europe, p. 11). The so- called " mock-up " vaccine now being prepared in Europe, which has not been clinically tested beforehand , raises concerns not only because of its content of insufficiently tested vaccine boosters ( adjuvants ), but also, in particular , for use in children and pregnant women because it contains the now obsolete mercury-containing preservative thiomersal . As a result , " mock-up " vaccines are not approved for use in pandemic cases in the United States. In Europe, on the other hand , in the case of a pandemic , the EMEA even provides for fast-track approval after clinical testing within one week (Committee for Proprietary Medical products (CPMP), EMEA/CPMP/VEG/4986/03, London April 2004).
From: Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ <
[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 3:24 PM
To:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]; Kaja Kallas
<
[email protected]>;
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: CLEAR STATEMENT - vaccination insurance compensation is a gift from politicians for the
vaccine maker / Advancement: The vaccine manufacturer have to pay ALONE and UNLIMITED for their
products!!!
Importance: High
Tere, (in bcc estonian supreme court and all journalists in Estonia)
what the government do now is a very hard kick in the face of all people in Estonia and a hard kick to
all companies in Estonia who have to take alone the liability about their products.
This now is a gift for the vaccine manufacturer orchestrated by politicians and we see again the good
old method “Privatize profits, socialize losses”
Clear advancement:
If a company sells a product which cause damages, then alone this company have to take the liability
for this!!!! It is so simple!
The company can arrange for this situation an own insurance like I can insure my own car.
The complete government, and special persons like Kaja Kallas, Tanel Kiik, Jüri Ratas, also Irja Lutsar
and the complete mass media say the vaccines are sure (like normal lemonade) and there is no big
problem.
Tell me all please an other normal product which you can sell with currently 1.163.356 side effects
and 30.551 deaths in Europe (Statistik Eudra Vigilance)?
So few questions and very important to wake up all journalists in Estona – we need now investigative
and not cheap copy & paste journalism)
1. Why - if the vaccine for you are like lemonade - the vaccine maker get no own product insurance for
this vaccines?
2. Why the vaccine maker if the vaccine is only like normal lemonade don´t take the liability?
3. Why they are afraid of the risk when these vaccines are so sure?
4. Why Tanel Kiik, Jüri Rats and Kaja Kalles are not able to show the vaccine contracts complete
without top secret areas?
5. Why Kiik, Ratas and Kallas are so afraid about opening the contracts and why they block the truth?
6. Can we really trust Kiik or Kalles or Ratas with such an unserious behavior and should these quality
of character in an position to decide about people?
I send you the crime from 2009 with the swine flu. Please estonian media and supreme court read this
document from Transparency International and think about does there exist the option that we have
exactly the same crime with involved politicians, involved media, involved health department,
involved WHO and again GAVI and good old Gates Foundation. Very important many people do for
money and power all an this is standard!
Kindly regards
Jörg Knieper
Geschäftsführer / General Manager
Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ
Narva maantee 5
10117 Tallinn
ESTONIA
Office: +372 664 5426 (languages english, estonian, russian)
Mobile +372 568 72866 (languages german, english)
skype +372 712 0575 (languages german, english)
eMail:
[email protected] (german)
eMail:
[email protected] (english)
Homepage: www.zahnrettungskonzept.info (german)
Homepage: www.toothrescueconcept.info (english)
Dear visitors to the website www.the-end-of-diviide-et-impera.info
In the past few months there have been considerable changes in the way society deals with each other
due to the topic of "Corona". This website wants to start the attempt to overcome the division in
society and to end the old method "DIVIDE ET IMPERA - divide and rule" completely. We don't need
DIVIDE ET IMPERA anymore and it is not good for all of us. A change begins fastest in each person itself
and since currently the topic "vaccination" is pressed ever more strongly with partial massive pressure
into the society, we give here some recommendations, which everyone for itself can consider and if
necessary actively convert, if he/she would like. We strive for a responsible and honest interaction
with each other.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A possible checklist for the decision vaccination yes or no:
1. Please take your time to inform yourself completely on all sources available to you.
2. If persons and organizations tell you, believe only these or those sources, it is an option to answer
as follows: thank you very much for your hint, but where and how I inform myself is alone my decision
and I want to make myself a comprehensive picture of the situation.
3. With all information/statistics it is important, always go to the source if possible and always ask
yourself, are these statements 100% honest, 100% objective, quickly and easily 100% verifiable for me
personally, are there financial interests, is there coercion or even massive blackmail in the background.
For example, please check for yourself the question, have all the people worldwide who have been
coded as Corona cases (on - with - in context) been subjected to a neutral, honest, and under oath
autopsy to determine the true final reason for death? Any insurance company will examine even a
simple eyeglass claim in detail to find the truth.
4. You know yourself best and honestly and calmly ask yourself the question, is Corona really life
threatening to me personally or do I trust my body and my natural immune system. Life always involves
risks that you must weigh for yourself on a daily basis.
5. Do not be pressured at any time by any person, company, organization, party, etc. regarding
vaccination. Vaccination is a significant and permanent intervention in the body and as a consequence
with partly side effects and even deaths that should not be underestimated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How to deal with people who force you to vaccinate or even massively blackmail you:
1. Make an agreement with the person concerned, in which the person signs the following notarized
text.
I, PERSON X, declare today at ....... that I have intentionally coerced Mr / Mrs Y to vaccinate and in large
parts also intentionally blackmailed them into vaccination by threatening them with restrictions. I am
100% aware that I am here massively violating the right to free speech and the right to physical
integrity of the person. I hereby confirm in lieu of an oath, should the person suffer any damage
(material / immaterial) as a result of the vaccination, that I personally will pay this damage in unlimited
amounts and this until the person's death. Furthermore, I agree that my coercion and blackmail
towards this person will be published on a website.
Checklist if you have decided free and without any pressure for a vaccination:
1. Request directly from the vaccine manufacturer of your choice all information about this vaccine
(ingredients, studies), in addition, all official documents of the registration to theKenntnis (emergency
approval yes or no) as well as a statement that in case of side effects of the vaccine the company has
to replace their damage in unlimited amount.
2. Ask the vaccine manufacturer for proof of appropriate insurance and the contact person at the
appropriate insurance company. Ask for confirmation that the insurance premium has been paid
and request all contractual data on this insurance.
3. Ask the doctor to hand over all the documents relating to the selected vaccine and document the
complete consultation prior to the vaccination. Let the doctor notarize that he is neither financially by
hidden commissions nor by political pressure via parties, associations, etc. under pressure or otherwise
completely biased. Also he should write you his statement that in case of side effects of the vaccine he
personal has to replace their damage in unlimited amount
4. Have a lawyer with a focus on medical law confirm that the doctor has given complete advice on
the vaccine with all side effects and risks.
5) Have your health insurance company explain in writing which costs they will cover if side effects
occur.
6. inform yourself intensively about the questions, how and where exactly do I report a vaccination
damage, which documents are required, under which conditions is a vaccination damage recognized,
what will be reimbursed and who can I hold personally liable afterwards.
Conclusion:
We are neither for nor against vaccination, but we believe that all decisions must be made on a careful
basis, honest information and without any pressure. Only then is it your own decision.
Sotsiaalministeerium
Meie: 09.12.2021
nr 7-5.11/21-02699-2
Kirja edastamine
Edastan Riigikantseleisse saabunud Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ kirja.
Lugupidamisega
(allkirjastatud digitaalselt)
Heili Tõnisson
Valitsuse nõunik
Stenbocki maja / Rahukohtu 3 / 15161 Tallinn / Estonia / registrikood 700004809
+372 693 5555 /
[email protected] / www.riigikantselei.ee
From: Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ <
[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, December 3, 2021 3:24 PM
To:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]; Kaja Kallas
<
[email protected]>;
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: CLEAR STATEMENT - vaccination insurance compensation is a gift from politicians for the
vaccine maker / Advancement: The vaccine manufacturer have to pay ALONE and UNLIMITED for their
products!!!
Importance: High
Tere, (in bcc estonian supreme court and all journalists in Estonia)
what the government do now is a very hard kick in the face of all people in Estonia and a hard kick to
all companies in Estonia who have to take alone the liability about their products.
This now is a gift for the vaccine manufacturer orchestrated by politicians and we see again the good
old method “Privatize profits, socialize losses”
Clear advancement:
If a company sells a product which cause damages, then alone this company have to take the liability
for this!!!! It is so simple!
The company can arrange for this situation an own insurance like I can insure my own car.
The complete government, and special persons like Kaja Kallas, Tanel Kiik, Jüri Ratas, also Irja Lutsar
and the complete mass media say the vaccines are sure (like normal lemonade) and there is no big
problem.
Tell me all please an other normal product which you can sell with currently 1.163.356 side effects
and 30.551 deaths in Europe (Statistik Eudra Vigilance)?
So few questions and very important to wake up all journalists in Estona – we need now investigative
and not cheap copy & paste journalism)
1. Why - if the vaccine for you are like lemonade - the vaccine maker get no own product insurance for
this vaccines?
2. Why the vaccine maker if the vaccine is only like normal lemonade don´t take the liability?
3. Why they are afraid of the risk when these vaccines are so sure?
4. Why Tanel Kiik, Jüri Rats and Kaja Kalles are not able to show the vaccine contracts complete
without top secret areas?
5. Why Kiik, Ratas and Kallas are so afraid about opening the contracts and why they block the truth?
6. Can we really trust Kiik or Kalles or Ratas with such an unserious behavior and should these quality
of character in an position to decide about people?
I send you the crime from 2009 with the swine flu. Please estonian media and supreme court read this
document from Transparency International and think about does there exist the option that we have
exactly the same crime with involved politicians, involved media, involved health department,
involved WHO and again GAVI and good old Gates Foundation. Very important many people do for
money and power all an this is standard!
Kindly regards
Jörg Knieper
Geschäftsführer / General Manager
Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ
Narva maantee 5
10117 Tallinn
ESTONIA
Office: +372 664 5426 (languages english, estonian, russian)
Mobile +372 568 72866 (languages german, english)
skype +372 712 0575 (languages german, english)
eMail:
[email protected] (german)
eMail:
[email protected] (english)
Homepage: www.zahnrettungskonzept.info (german)
Homepage: www.toothrescueconcept.info (english)
Dear visitors to the website www.the-end-of-diviide-et-impera.info
In the past few months there have been considerable changes in the way society deals with each other
due to the topic of "Corona". This website wants to start the attempt to overcome the division in
society and to end the old method "DIVIDE ET IMPERA - divide and rule" completely. We don't need
DIVIDE ET IMPERA anymore and it is not good for all of us. A change begins fastest in each person itself
and since currently the topic "vaccination" is pressed ever more strongly with partial massive pressure
into the society, we give here some recommendations, which everyone for itself can consider and if
necessary actively convert, if he/she would like. We strive for a responsible and honest interaction
with each other.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A possible checklist for the decision vaccination yes or no:
1. Please take your time to inform yourself completely on all sources available to you.
2. If persons and organizations tell you, believe only these or those sources, it is an option to answer
as follows: thank you very much for your hint, but where and how I inform myself is alone my decision
and I want to make myself a comprehensive picture of the situation.
3. With all information/statistics it is important, always go to the source if possible and always ask
yourself, are these statements 100% honest, 100% objective, quickly and easily 100% verifiable for me
personally, are there financial interests, is there coercion or even massive blackmail in the background.
For example, please check for yourself the question, have all the people worldwide who have been
coded as Corona cases (on - with - in context) been subjected to a neutral, honest, and under oath
autopsy to determine the true final reason for death? Any insurance company will examine even a
simple eyeglass claim in detail to find the truth.
4. You know yourself best and honestly and calmly ask yourself the question, is Corona really life
threatening to me personally or do I trust my body and my natural immune system. Life always involves
risks that you must weigh for yourself on a daily basis.
5. Do not be pressured at any time by any person, company, organization, party, etc. regarding
vaccination. Vaccination is a significant and permanent intervention in the body and as a consequence
with partly side effects and even deaths that should not be underestimated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How to deal with people who force you to vaccinate or even massively blackmail you:
1. Make an agreement with the person concerned, in which the person signs the following notarized
text.
I, PERSON X, declare today at ....... that I have intentionally coerced Mr / Mrs Y to vaccinate and in large
parts also intentionally blackmailed them into vaccination by threatening them with restrictions. I am
100% aware that I am here massively violating the right to free speech and the right to physical
integrity of the person. I hereby confirm in lieu of an oath, should the person suffer any damage
(material / immaterial) as a result of the vaccination, that I personally will pay this damage in unlimited
amounts and this until the person's death. Furthermore, I agree that my coercion and blackmail
towards this person will be published on a website.
Checklist if you have decided free and without any pressure for a vaccination:
1. Request directly from the vaccine manufacturer of your choice all information about this vaccine
(ingredients, studies), in addition, all official documents of the registration to theKenntnis (emergency
approval yes or no) as well as a statement that in case of side effects of the vaccine the company has
to replace their damage in unlimited amount.
2. Ask the vaccine manufacturer for proof of appropriate insurance and the contact person at the
appropriate insurance company. Ask for confirmation that the insurance premium has been paid
and request all contractual data on this insurance.
3. Ask the doctor to hand over all the documents relating to the selected vaccine and document the
complete consultation prior to the vaccination. Let the doctor notarize that he is neither financially by
hidden commissions nor by political pressure via parties, associations, etc. under pressure or otherwise
completely biased. Also he should write you his statement that in case of side effects of the vaccine he
personal has to replace their damage in unlimited amount
4. Have a lawyer with a focus on medical law confirm that the doctor has given complete advice on
the vaccine with all side effects and risks.
5) Have your health insurance company explain in writing which costs they will cover if side effects
occur.
6. inform yourself intensively about the questions, how and where exactly do I report a vaccination
damage, which documents are required, under which conditions is a vaccination damage recognized,
what will be reimbursed and who can I hold personally liable afterwards.
Conclusion:
We are neither for nor against vaccination, but we believe that all decisions must be made on a careful
basis, honest information and without any pressure. Only then is it your own decision.
" Swine Flu " Vaccination : Transparency Criticizes Potential Conflicts of Interest and Non-Transparent Decision -Making Processes at the Permanent Vaccination Commission STIKO 14.09.2009 Berlin, 14.09.2009 - The anti- corruption organization Transparency International Germany is calling for disclosure of the decision-making processes of the Permanent Vaccination Commission (STIKO) in light of the increasing uncertainty among the population regarding the planned vaccination against swine flu . Angela Spelsberg, board member of Transparency Germany: "The current public debate confirms our years of criticism : intransparency and potential conflicts of interest undermine credibility and, in the current case , feed the suspicion that the H1N1 flu wave is being used as a swine flu pandemic by the pharmaceutical industry for marketing purposes ." The existing mechanisms to ensure the independence of the decisions of the Standing Commission on Vaccination (STIKO), especially with regard to the disclosure of conflicts of interest , are considered insufficient . Furthermore , it is to be criticized that , in accordance with the STIKO's rules of procedure , the minutes of the meetings and the decisions , and above all their justifications , are not published as a matter of principle . Since August 2008, the members of STIKO have disclosed their potential conflicts of interest on the STIKO website after years of urging , also by Transparency Germany. This is worthy of recognition as a first step . The current information from March 2009 shows that the majority of the current 16 members have more or less intensive contacts , including paid activities , with the most important manufacturers of vaccines . Furthermore , it can be read that some of the STIKO members are involved in the "Forum Impfen", which in turn enjoys financial support from the company Sanofi-Pasteur-MSD (SPMSD), among others . The website of the "Forum Impfen" gives no indication of the financial amount of this support. In view of the high level of uncertainty in the population and also in the medical profession about the necessity and risks of vaccination , a professional and independent recommendation by specialists is indispensable for confidence -building. This must be ensured through full disclosure and the avoidance of any impression of influence by the pharmaceutical industry . The German government has also failed to make the basis of its experts ' decisions comprehensible and transparent to the - scientific - public . The vaccine was approved by the European regulatory authority EMEA, whose work Transparency Deutschland has been observing extremely critically for years . Both the subordination of the EMEA to the Directorate -General for Economic Affairs and not to the Directorate -General for Health and Consumer Protection (DG Sanco ) of the European Commission , as well as its financing to almost two-thirds by the pharmaceutical industry , are regarded as highly problematic , especially since a review of the approval documents by external scientists is generally only possible after approval has been granted . Contact Dr. Angela Spelsberg, Member of the Board Dr. Christian Humborg , Managing Director Transparency International Germany e.V. Tel.: 030 / 54 98 98 0 Further information on the facts of the case : 1. on May 1, 2009, Professor Sir Roy Anderson, as an advisor to the British government , rector of Imperial College London, and member of the Scientific Advisory Council for Emergencies (SAGE), referred to the cases of swine flu as a pandemic outbreak in a radio interview . The July 27, 2009, online edition of the Daily Mail reported that the government advisor has been on the payroll of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) for years with a salary of 135,000 euros . The shares of this vaccine manufacturer rose considerably immediately after the " swine flu pandemic " was declared . 2. On June 11, 2009, Ms. Chan, the Director -General of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva, declared swine flu a pandemic , triggering corresponding action in all WHO member countries. Ms. Chan's relationship with the pharmaceutical industry has not been without controversy since she severely criticized the government of Thailand for granting compulsory licenses for low-cost AIDS drugs when she took office in 2007 (Bangkok Post, February 2, 2007; www.bangkokpost.com). 3. the federal government and its advisors support the WHO's position , as they are obliged to do under the pandemic declaration . They have ordered 50 million doses of vaccine from GlaxoSmithKline, worth 700 million euros , to be paid for by the contributions of those with statutory health insurance and by taxpayers . However , neither the STIKO nor the German government have publicly informed the public that H1N1 is a known virus that was already introduced into the USA in the 1970s as the so- called Asian swine flu by Vietnamese soldiers . Because the virus spread rapidly at that time, about forty million U.S. citizens were vaccinated until 1976. Then vaccination was discontinued because infection with the virus was usually so mild and free of complications that the rare complications of the vaccine , such as Guillain-Barré syndrome , weighed more heavily (Washington Times, April 27, 2009). 4 So far , the viral infection in Germany has also shown this benign course . While in a usual flu season in Germany about 10,000 deaths are to be expected , i.e. 50 deaths per day , so far no fatal courses have been documented in our country . 5 The vaccine is approved by the European regulatory authority EMEA, whose working methods Transparency Deutschland last described in its "Scheinwerfer" ( No . 43, April 2009, Focus on Europe, p. 11). The so- called " mock-up " vaccine now being prepared in Europe, which has not been clinically tested beforehand , raises concerns not only because of its content of insufficiently tested vaccine boosters ( adjuvants ), but also, in particular , for use in children and pregnant women because it contains the now obsolete mercury-containing preservative thiomersal . As a result , " mock-up " vaccines are not approved for use in pandemic cases in the United States. In Europe, on the other hand , in the case of a pandemic , the EMEA even provides for fast-track approval after clinical testing within one week (Committee for Proprietary Medical products (CPMP), EMEA/CPMP/VEG/4986/03, London April 2004).