Pöördumise edastamine

Sotsiaalministeerium Meie: 19.11.2021 nr 7-5.11/21-02490-2 Kirja edastamine Edastan Riigikantseleisse saabunud Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ kirja. Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Heili Tõnisson Valitsuse nõunik Stenbocki maja / Rahukohtu 3 / 15161 Tallinn / Estonia / registrikood 700004809 +372 693 5555 / [email protected] / www.riigikantselei.ee  From: Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2021 3:57 PM To: [email protected]; Kaja Kallas <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Dear Tanel Kiik, dear Kaja Kallas - for vaccine damages have only to pay the vaccine producer and all persons who had pushed hard the people to this vaccination Importance: High Dear Tanel Kiik, dear Kaja Kallas I saw just in this moment this article and it needs a bigger decision with the complete Estonian population and not only over few people! https://www.err.ee/1608401579/kiik-vaktsiinikahjude-fondist-raagime-monesajast-tuhandest-eurost- aastas Statement: First it is important to know that I was over many years an insurance broker. The simple rule is, when a person or company produces products which causes damages, then the same person and company have to pay for this. Or in other words, if you Tanel Kiik or Kaja Kallaes would damage things from people in Estonia, you only alone and personal have to pay for this damages. The situation is now very simple and you can handle this like every situation between two people. If you destroy my let´s say glassses, then you have to pay for this complete. And there is no glass fund to pay this NO you alone have to pay this. I understand you Tanel Kiik and Kaja Kallas, in the contracts between the vaccine maker is written, if something happens through the vaccines, the vaccine maker have to pay nothing and you the politicians have signed this paper which says clear, no politicians in the governemnt and alo no vaccine maker takes any liability. These contracts are in my eyes crimimal, they work against the population! But this is a other point to discuss. Now my simple request: Let´s discuss this questions together direct with the complete people in Estonia, who alone should pay for damages after vaccination! There is attached the model DECISIONFINDER or OTSUSELEIDJA and over this 8 steps you get honest opinions. We only have to take care, that there is no chance that people pay to change opinions, people get blackmailed or any other elements from this standard corruption tricks. My own opinion is simple: Who causes the damages - this person alone have to pay all und this unlimited! These are the following two groups and we should create a list about group: 1. All people, media. companies and organization who have pushed people hard to this vaccinatiion (this we can find easy in internet and print) 2. All vaccine manufacturer (this we can alo find in internet and print) What are the benefits to decide this together with the people in Estonia? 1. We get an decision which shows clear how the population see this situation 2. Corruptionn and other standard methods to decide over the popullation have no chance 3. Pharma, GAVI and the Gates Foundatiin and so on cannot buy people who would decide this normally alone 4. We don´t need a vaccine fund paid from the people in Estonoa, NO we take the money direct from the people who causes this damages If you really want that the ghost of good and free democracy lives in Estonia, then it should be no problem to speak about this with the people in Estonia. Or do you have top secrets? Kindly regards Jörg Knieper Geschäftsführer / General Manager Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ Narva maantee 5 10117 Tallinn ESTONIA Office: +372 664 5426 (languages english, estonian, russian) Mobile +372 568 72866 (languages german, english) skype +372 712 0575 (languages german, english) eMail: [email protected] (german) eMail: [email protected] (english) Homepage: www.zahnrettungskonzept.info (german) Homepage: www.toothrescueconcept.info (english)  Project: THE END OF DIVIDE ET IMPERA (Part: Decisionfinder) The 8 steps to find together the best decision COMMENTS Objective description of the problem in a clear and Publication on a central website understandable way, without panic, without distortion List which experts should be considered for this and Publication on the same website according to which criteria. Presentation of the experts The following information of the experts mandatory: Complete curriculum vitae (certified), question about bias with immediate consequences in case of not honest statements (under oath). Careful examination of the experts 1. Is the expert (m/f) professionally suitable for The examination of the expert should ensure that the problem and 100% independent there is no corruption from outside and selfish 2. Check for financial interests interests have no chance in solving the problem! 3. Examination if there is blackmail in the background 4. Check for memberships 5. Examination of professional achievements in the history Public discussion (livestream) with the final experts The public media, corporate media, social media, elected by the public in all media and this always YouTube, etc. act here ONLY as a technical uncut. *Importantly, all people should form their own platform for playback and distribution. opinion objectively and on fully transparent Comments or evaluations by the media information. themselves are undesirable! The people can already think for themselves! Reduction of the possible ways to solve the problem After the long public discussion, the population is to final 2-3 options. Preparation of the solutions in a well informed and will be open to the 2-3 options clear form with PRO & KONTRA and survey to the in order to finally decide for a certain way. population directly on the website. No external survey companies because of the high risk of targeted manipulation. Decision for a particular solution with the following Division prevents the targeted corruption and voting significance extortion of individuals 50% - population 50%- experts Transferring the implementation of the problem to an 1. Publication of the planned solution organization (project management), which in years of 2. Permanent transparency of the project status experience in the implementation of 3. Continuous control whether the solution leads projects have to the goal From: Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2021 3:57 PM To: [email protected]; Kaja Kallas <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: Dear Tanel Kiik, dear Kaja Kallas - for vaccine damages have only to pay the vaccine producer and all persons who had pushed hard the people to this vaccination Importance: High Dear Tanel Kiik, dear Kaja Kallas I saw just in this moment this article and it needs a bigger decision with the complete Estonian population and not only over few people! https://www.err.ee/1608401579/kiik-vaktsiinikahjude-fondist-raagime-monesajast-tuhandest-eurost- aastas Statement: First it is important to know that I was over many years an insurance broker. The simple rule is, when a person or company produces products which causes damages, then the same person and company have to pay for this. Or in other words, if you Tanel Kiik or Kaja Kallaes would damage things from people in Estonia, you only alone and personal have to pay for this damages. The situation is now very simple and you can handle this like every situation between two people. If you destroy my let´s say glassses, then you have to pay for this complete. And there is no glass fund to pay this NO you alone have to pay this. I understand you Tanel Kiik and Kaja Kallas, in the contracts between the vaccine maker is written, if something happens through the vaccines, the vaccine maker have to pay nothing and you the politicians have signed this paper which says clear, no politicians in the governemnt and alo no vaccine maker takes any liability. These contracts are in my eyes crimimal, they work against the population! But this is a other point to discuss. Now my simple request: Let´s discuss this questions together direct with the complete people in Estonia, who alone should pay for damages after vaccination! There is attached the model DECISIONFINDER or OTSUSELEIDJA and over this 8 steps you get honest opinions. We only have to take care, that there is no chance that people pay to change opinions, people get blackmailed or any other elements from this standard corruption tricks. My own opinion is simple: Who causes the damages - this person alone have to pay all und this unlimited! These are the following two groups and we should create a list about group: 1. All people, media. companies and organization who have pushed people hard to this vaccinatiion (this we can find easy in internet and print) 2. All vaccine manufacturer (this we can alo find in internet and print) What are the benefits to decide this together with the people in Estonia? 1. We get an decision which shows clear how the population see this situation 2. Corruptionn and other standard methods to decide over the popullation have no chance 3. Pharma, GAVI and the Gates Foundatiin and so on cannot buy people who would decide this normally alone 4. We don´t need a vaccine fund paid from the people in Estonoa, NO we take the money direct from the people who causes this damages If you really want that the ghost of good and free democracy lives in Estonia, then it should be no problem to speak about this with the people in Estonia. Or do you have top secrets? Kindly regards Jörg Knieper Geschäftsführer / General Manager Dental Traumatology Projects OÜ Narva maantee 5 10117 Tallinn ESTONIA Office: +372 664 5426 (languages english, estonian, russian) Mobile +372 568 72866 (languages german, english) skype +372 712 0575 (languages german, english) eMail: [email protected] (german) eMail: [email protected] (english) Homepage: www.zahnrettungskonzept.info (german) Homepage: www.toothrescueconcept.info (english) Project: THE END OF DIVIDE ET IMPERA (Part: Decisionfinder) The 8 steps to find together the best decision COMMENTS Objective description of the problem in a clear and Publication on a central website understandable way, without panic, without distortion List which experts should be considered for this and Publication on the same website according to which criteria. Presentation of the experts The following information of the experts mandatory: Complete curriculum vitae (certified), question about bias with immediate consequences in case of not honest statements (under oath). Careful examination of the experts 1. Is the expert (m/f) professionally suitable for The examination of the expert should ensure that the problem and 100% independent there is no corruption from outside and selfish 2. Check for financial interests interests have no chance in solving the problem! 3. Examination if there is blackmail in the background 4. Check for memberships 5. Examination of professional achievements in the history Public discussion (livestream) with the final experts The public media, corporate media, social media, elected by the public in all media and this always YouTube, etc. act here ONLY as a technical uncut. *Importantly, all people should form their own platform for playback and distribution. opinion objectively and on fully transparent Comments or evaluations by the media information. themselves are undesirable! The people can already think for themselves! Reduction of the possible ways to solve the problem After the long public discussion, the population is to final 2-3 options. Preparation of the solutions in a well informed and will be open to the 2-3 options clear form with PRO & KONTRA and survey to the in order to finally decide for a certain way. population directly on the website. No external survey companies because of the high risk of targeted manipulation. Decision for a particular solution with the following Division prevents the targeted corruption and voting significance extortion of individuals 50% - population 50%- experts Transferring the implementation of the problem to an 1. Publication of the planned solution organization (project management), which in years of 2. Permanent transparency of the project status experience in the implementation of 3. Continuous control whether the solution leads projects have to the goal