dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
Otsing›Sotsiaalministeerium
Sissetulev kiriAvalik

Kiri

Sotsiaalministeerium · 26. november 2021
Viit
1.4-4/3710-2
Registreeritud
26. november 2021
Dokumendi liik
Sissetulev kiri
Adressaat
WHO EURO HRH Framework for Action
Saabumis/saatmisviis
e-post
Funktsioon
1.4 EL otsustusprotsess ja rahvusvaheline koostöö
Sari
1.4-4 Kutsed ja kirjavahetus rahvusvahelistel seminaridel, konverentsidel jt üritustel osalemiseks
Toimik
1.4-4/2021
Vastutaja
Agris Koppel (Sotsiaalministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Terviseala asekantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Tervisesüsteemi arendamise osakond)

Failid

  • 📎E-kiri.pdf80 KB
  • 📎EN_R3_WHO EHS pulse survey.pdf917 KB
  • 📎EST.pdf126 KB

Sisu (failidest)

Saatja: WHO EURO HRH Framework for Action <[email protected]> Saadetud: 26.11.2021 15:03 Adressaat: Kaija Kasekamp <[email protected]>; SM Info <[email protected]> Koopia: TILLE, Florian <[email protected]>; Essential Health Services Monitoring <[email protected]>; KÖHLER, Kristina <[email protected]> Teema: FW: EST - National pulse survey on the continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic Dear Ms Kasekamp, Regarding the third round of the National Pulse Survey on the Continuity of Essential Health Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic, I would like to inform you that the deadline for completion has been extended by another two weeks, until 14 December 2021. I very much hope that this will make it more feasible to respond to the survey in the midst of many other competing priorities. I encourage the submission of responses particularly for the core Continuity of EHS module (section 1 of the survey). Once more, I would like to thank you for assisting in disseminating the survey and facilitating its completion in your country. Would you need any assistance or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us addressing your queries to Florian Tille () and . Thank you very much. Best regards, Natasha From: WHO EURO HRH Framework for Action Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 1:20 PMTo: [email protected]; [email protected]: KÖHLER, Kristina &lt;[email protected]&gt;Subject: FW: EST - National pulse survey on the continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic Dear Ms Kasekamp, This is a gentle reminder regarding the third round of the national pulse survey on the continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. We would be grateful if you can assist in disseminating the survey to the Ministry of Health and facilitate its completion. We would also like to inform you that the deadline for completion has been extended by one week, to 30 November 2021. We understand the current constraints on your time and pressure on your office and I would like to stress out how grateful I am for your continuous support and your collaboration in assisting your country in completing this survey. Would you need any assistance or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us addressing your queries to Florian Tille () and . Thank you very much. Best regards, Natasha From: WHO EURO HRH Framework for Action Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 10:58 AMTo: Cc: ; KÖHLER, Kristina &lt;&gt;; Essential Health Services Monitoring &lt;&gt;; EURO Strategic Relations with Countries &lt;&gt;; EGGERS, Rudi &lt;&gt;; O'NEILL, Kathryn &lt;&gt;; ZAPATA, Tomas &lt;&gt;; TILLE, Florian &lt;&gt;; DELL AMURA, Lucia &lt;&gt;Subject: EST - National pulse survey on the continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic Dear Ms Kasekamp, Please find attached a letter (with enclosure) from the Director, Division of Country Health Policies and Systems, related to the third round of the national pulse survey on the continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yours sincerely, Lisa Copple, Programme AssistantDivision of Country Health Policies and Systems National pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic Purpose The National pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic aims to rapidly assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health systems and essential health services throughout the course of the pandemic. The survey provides insight from country key informants into the current country situation, the extent of disruptions, and how countries are responding to mitigate challenges and recover services against a rapidly changing context. Data use Once the survey is completed, countries are encouraged to use the results – combined with other data – to inform roundtable discussions and policy dialogues to identify critical bottlenecks and guide priority actions. Key informants and content areas The pulse survey consists of questions related to current national policies, plans and structures, disruptions to health services, reasons for disruptions, mitigation strategies, recovery approaches, information tracking, and priority needs. Different survey sections target different key informants in the country. The online survey has been designed so that each section can be answered simultaneously by respective country focal points to facilitate rapid completion, reduce burden, and ensure that each content area is assessed by its respective technical focal point. Survey sections and suggested key informants are in the table below. Please note this survey round does not include a section on noncommunicable diseases because a separate WHO survey with comparable data has recently been conducted. # Outline of survey modules Suggested key informant(s) 1. Continuity of essential health services module - Policies, planning and investment Health system, service delivery, or essential health - Service disruptions across service delivery services incident management support team focal platforms point(s) - Mitigation strategies and recovery measures - Information tracking - Health system bottlenecks and priority needs to support delivery of: o essential health services o essential COVID-19 tools In-depth modules on disruptions to tracer service areas 2. Sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and Sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health adolescent health focal point(s) 3. Nutrition Nutrition focal point(s) 4. Immunization Immunization focal point(s) 5. Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis focal point(s) 6. Tuberculosis Tuberculosis focal point(s) 7. Malaria Malaria focal point(s) 8. Neglected tropical diseases Neglected tropical diseases focal point(s) 9. Mental, neurological and substance use disorders Mental health, neurology and substance abuse focal point(s) 10. Care for older people Care for older people focal point(s) 1 Reporting period The questions refer to the 6-month time period preceding the month of survey completion. In the case of survey completion in November, this refers to: May-October 2021. Suggested modality for completion It is recommended that a survey focal point (from WHO CO and/or within the Ministry of Health as appropriate to country context) be designated to lead the survey coordination process, including: 1. Identifying national focal points/key informants to complete each survey section (for some in-depth modules, this may involve representatives from relevant professional associations if there are no designated ministerial level focal points); 2. Disseminating the survey link to relevant national focal points/key informants; 3. Tracking and following up completion of survey sections; and 4. As feasible, organizing follow up activities and dialogues to support data use. Ideally, survey key informants will come together in a collaborative discussion to review and align responses across survey sections prior to submission. If this is not possible, each section can be completed independently by its respective key informant. How to submit responses online Please click on the survey section links to review the WHO data sharing agreement (annex 1) and access the survey. Key informants may access the survey sections as many times as needed, saving responses along the way. Please note that multiple users cannot access the same section at the same time. A single key informant should be designated to complete each survey section to reduce the risk of overwriting other’s responses should multiple key informants enter a survey section. Once each section is submitted, the answers may be printed for record. Please note that all personal and identifying details will be kept confidential and not included in reporting. These details will only be used to follow up in the case of any clarifications. Large decentralized countries may consider completion of the pulse survey at the subnational level to then be aggregated at the national level. If this may be of interest, please contact [email protected] for survey support. Survey responses will be accepted until 23 November 2021. 2 Continuity of essential health services To be completed by: Health system, service delivery, or essential health services incident management support team focal point(s) This section will assess cross-cutting health system areas, including: national policies and plans; disruptions to service delivery platforms and cross-cutting services for primary, inpatient, emergency, rehabilitative, and palliative care; reasons for service disruptions; mitigation strategies and recovery approaches; and information tracking. It also includes a sub-section on health system bottlenecks related to COVID-19 case management. Respondent information Who is the focal point(s) who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Policies and planning 1. Has your country developed 1. Yes, developed and/or revised a policy or plan 2. Yes, developed and revised in last 6 months for continuity of essential health 3. No, does not exist services during the COVID-19 4. Do not know pandemic? If yes, please upload or link the most recent policy or plans (if not already uploaded during previous survey round). 2. Has your country developed or 1. Yes revised a health system recovery 2. No plan to strengthen health service 3. Not yet, but planning to develop resilience and preparedness for 4. Do not know future public health emergencies? If yes, please upload or link the plan. 3. During the previous 6 months, Primary care services (including family medicine) [ ] Functioning as normal how have government policies [ ] Limited and directives affected Outpatient specialist services [ ] Suspended functioning of the following [ ] Do not know service delivery platforms? Inpatient services Please respond for each service Emergency unit services delivery platform. Prehospital emergency care services (e.g. ambulance transport) Community-based care (e.g. outreach campaigns, home-based care, care in long-term facilities) 3 Mobile clinics 4. During the previous 6 months, Health protection (e.g. management of [ ] Functioning as normal how have government policies environmental, food, toxicological and [ ] Limited and directives affected the occupational safety) [ ] Suspended following essential public health [ ] Do not know functions and activities? Health promotion population-based activities Please respond for each function Disease prevention population-based activities or activity. Surveillance and response Emergency preparedness and response Communications and social mobilization activities for health Public health research 5. At what level(s) does decision- 1. Central Ministry of Health making and/or development of 2. Decentralized Health Authorities policies and strategies for 3. Individual facilities adapting and restoring essential 4. Do not know health services during COVID-19 take place? Please check all that apply. 6. During 2021, has the 1. Maintaining essential health services during [ ] Yes government allocated additional the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g. service [ ] No funding for the following areas? delivery modifications, catch up strategies) [ ] Do not know 2. Longer-term health system recovery and/or Please respond for each area. health service resilience and preparedness If yes to answer 2, in which of the following sub- areas have investments been made? Please check all that apply: a. New facility infrastructure b. Digital health technologies and infrastructure c. Health workforce capacity strengthening d. Access to medicines, supplies and other health products e. Technologies and methods to support infodemic management f. Do not know Service disruptions 7. 7.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to 7.b How does this level of 7.c What was the COVID-19 during the previous 6 months (i.e. disruption compare to the primary reason for this level of disruption during disruption? 4 percentage of users not served as usual compared to the first quarter of 2021 before the pandemic) for the following service areas. (January-March 2021)? Please respond for each service area. Routine scheduled primary care [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse [ ] Intentional service clinic services [ ] 26-50% than Jan-March 2021 delivery modifications [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better [ ] Decreased care- Unscheduled primary care clinic [ ] Less than 5% than Jan-March 2021 seeking services (including 0%) [ ] Still disrupted, no [ ] Unintended [ ] Do not know change from Jan-March disruptions due to lack of Appointments with specialists [ ] Not applicable 2021 health care resources (outpatient) [ ] Back to pre-pandemic [ ] Do not know levels Prescription renewals for chronic [ ] Do not know medications Cancer screening Cancer treatment Prehospital emergency care services (e.g. ambulance transport) 24-hour emergency unit services Outreach services (mobile clinics, campaigns, etc.) Health post and home visits by community health workers Hospital inpatient services Elective surgeries and procedures Emergency surgeries Rehabilitative services Palliative services 8. During the previous 6 months, 1. Yes have there been disruptions to 2. No the in-country supply chain 3. Do not know system? 9. During the previous 6 months, Elective surgeries and procedures 1. Decreased what has been the trend in 2. Increased 5 backlogs for the following service Appointments with specialists (outpatient) 3. Not applicable areas? 4. Do not know Screening, diagnosis and treatment of cancers Please respond for each service area. Screening, diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases Rehabilitation services Mitigation strategies and recovery measures 10. During the previous 6 months, Service delivery modifications what have been the most 1. Expansion of facility hours successful approaches to 2. Provision of home-based care where appropriate overcome service disruptions? 3. Telemedicine deployment to replace in-person consults 4. Use of self-care interventions where appropriate Please check all that apply. 5. Catch-up campaigns for missed appointments 6. Integration of several services into single visit Please only select the strategies 7. Redirection of patients to alternate care sites /reorientation of referral or measures that have been pathways major contributors to Health worker capacities and training overcoming disruptions. 8. Redistribution of health worker tasks and optimization of roles 9. Rapid training mechanisms and job aids for key capacities and newly distributed tasks and roles (e.g. essential IPC measures, use of digital tools, screening, triage, etc.) 10. Recruitment of additional staff 11. Provision of mental health care and psychosocial support to health workers 12. Establishment of pathways for accelerated training and early certification of medical, nursing and other key staff (with appropriate controls in place) 13. Paid sick leave, overtime pay, and/or hazard pay Access to medicines and health products 14. Novel approaches to renewing prescriptions and dispensing medications 15. Adaption of supply chain logistics and management processes 16. Procurement of surge commodities (e.g. personal protective equipment (PPE), oxygen) Community engagement and risk communication strategies 17. Community communications (e.g. informing on changes to service delivery, addressing misinformation and community fears of infection, targeted outreach where utilization has declined, hotlines) 18. Use of proactive governmental strategies to reach vulnerable groups 19. Use of existing networks or organizations (e.g. NGOs) to reach vulnerable groups Health financing strategies 20. Removal of user fees or provision of subsidies for fees at point of use 21. Provision of cash transfers for vulnerable populations to access care (e.g. refugees and migrants) 6 22. Agreements with private health facilities to deliver essential health services supported through public funds Other 23. Others (please specify): 24. Do not know 25. Not applicable Information tracking 11.a Is your country regularly 1. Yes monitoring the continuity of 2. No essential health services during 3. Do not know the COVID-19 pandemic? 11.b If yes to 11.a, does this include 1. Yes regular monitoring of mitigation 2. No or recovery strategies to 3. Do not know overcome service disruptions? 11.c If yes to 11.a, does this include 1. Yes regular monitoring of the long- 2. No term effects of essential health 3. Do not know service disruptions (e.g. excess morbidity and mortality)? 12. Has your country produced one 1. Yes or more qualitative or 2. No quantitative analysis of health 3. Do not know inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g. report, paper, research)? 13. Is your country collecting or 1. Yes collating data on comorbidities in 2. No COVID-19 patients? 3. Do not know 14. Is your country collecting or 1. Yes collating patient-level data on 2. No post-COVID-19 condition and its 3. Do not know sequelae? 15. Does your country currently have 1. Yes, within Ministry of Health or equivalent a team dedicated to tracking and 2. Yes, within government but in another ministry addressing the infodemic and 3. Not yet, but planning on setting up a unit health misinformation? 4. No unit, but we have staff completing these tasks (e.g. a taskforce or unit for: 5. No analyzing and monitoring 6. Do not know misinformation online and offline, and how it affects acceptance of public health measures and health seeking behaviors; analyzing and proposing evidence-based interventions to counter misinformation at national, subnational, community and individual levels) 7 Priority needs to support continuity of essential health services 16. What are your most urgent Please use the text box to give your suggestions priority needs and technical assistance requirements from WHO for continuity of essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic? Health system bottlenecks and priority needs to support delivery of COVID-19 essential tools 17.a What are the three main 1. Lack of funding (e.g. to procure or deliver laboratory supplies and bottlenecks for potential scale up equipment) of COVID-19 diagnostic and 2. Health workforce challenges (e.g. insufficient quantities, distribution or testing capacities in your competencies to administer tests) country? 3. Shortages in laboratory supplies and equipment at central or facility levels 4. Lack of distribution capacity (e.g. supply delays at central level) 5. Lack of clear strategy, guidance or protocols for diagnosis and testing 6. Lack of data/information to monitor progress and needs 7. Demand-side challenges (e.g. community acceptance for testing, affordability) 8. Other (please specify) 9. None/scale up not needed (skip next question) 17.b What are the three main 1. Financial planning support technical assistance or support 2. Health worker recruitment, retention and training interventions needed to address 3. Operational guidance and protocols for supply chain management these bottlenecks? 4. Surge procurement of COVID-19 laboratory supplies and equipment 5. Guidance on developing national policies, strategies, or plans for scale up of diagnosis and testing 6. Rapid tools or guidance to assess and monitor gaps and health system absorption capacities 7. Risk communication and community engagement strategies 8. Other (please specify) 18.a What are the three main 1. Lack of funding (e.g. to procure or deliver medicines, medical supplies, bottlenecks for potential scale up oxygen, and ventilators) of COVID-19 case management 2. Health workforce challenges (e.g. insufficient quantities, distribution, or capacities in your country? competencies to treat patients) 3. Shortages in COVID-19 therapeutics and equipment (e.g. lack of medicines, medical supplies, oxygen, ventilators and beds at central or facility levels) 4. Lack of distribution capacity (e.g. supply delays at central level in medicines, medical supplies, oxygen, and ventilators) 5. Lack of clear strategy, guidance or protocols for COVID-19 case management suited to context 6. Lack of data/information to monitor progress and needs 7. Demand-side challenges (e.g. community acceptance for treatment, affordability) 8. Other (please specify) 9. None/scale up not needed (skip next question) 8 18.b What are the three main 1. Financial planning support technical assistance or support 2. Health worker recruitment, retention and training interventions needed to address 3. Operational guidance and protocols for supply chain management these bottlenecks? 4. Surge procurement of COVID-19 related therapeutics and equipment (e.g. oxygen, ventilators) 5. Guidance on developing national policies, strategies, or plans for scale up of case management capacities 6. Rapid tools or guidance to assess and monitor gaps and health system absorption capacities 7. Risk communication and community engagement strategies 8. Other (please specify) 19.a What are the three main 1. Lack of funding (e.g. to procure or deliver PPE) bottlenecks for potential scale up 2. Health workforce challenges (e.g. lack of knowledge on appropriate use of PPE distribution and use in of PPE) your country? 3. Shortages in PPE at central or facility level (including size and quality issues of available PPE) 4. Lack of distribution capacity (e.g. supply delays at central level) 5. Lack of clear strategy, guidance or protocols on appropriate use of PPE 6. Lack of data/information to monitor progress and needs) 7. Other (please specify) 8. None/there is no PPE shortage (skip next question) 19.b What are the three main 1. Financial planning support technical assistance or support 2. Health worker training on appropriate use of PPE interventions needed to address 3. Operational guidance and protocols for supply chain management these bottlenecks? 4. Surge procurement of PPE 5. Guidance on developing national policies, strategies, or plans for scale up of PPE 6. Rapid tools or guidance to assess and monitor gaps and health system absorption capacities 7. Other (please specify) 209. What are the three main 1. Lack of funding (e.g. to procure or deliver vaccines) a bottlenecks for potential scale up 2. Health workforce challenges (e.g. insufficient quantities distribution, or of COVID-19 vaccination in your competencies to vaccinate populations) country? 3. Shortages in vaccines and equipment at central or facility levels (including vaccines, fridges and freezers) 4. Lack of distribution capacity (e.g. supply delays at central level) 5. Lack of clear strategy, guidance or protocols for vaccination roll out 6. Demand-side challenges (e.g. community acceptance for vaccination, affordability) 7. Other (please specify) 8. None/scale up not needed (skip next question) 20.b What are the three main 1. Financial planning support technical assistance or support 2. Health worker recruitment, retention and training interventions needed to address 3. Operational guidance and protocols for supply chain management these bottlenecks? 4. Procurement of vaccines 5. Guidance on developing national policies, strategies, or plans for scale up of vaccination 9 6. Rapid tools or guidance to assess and monitor gaps and health system absorption capacities 7. Risk communication and community engagement strategies 8. Other (please specify) Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption (question 7) • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Definitions for reasons for disruption (question 7) • Intentional service delivery modifications: temporary scaling back or suspension/cancellation of services • Decreased care-seeking: patients not presenting due to community fear/mistrust, financial difficulties during lockdown, or other barriers to care. • Unintended disruptions due to lack of health care resources: challenges related to health worker availability and capacities, availability of essential health products, facility infrastructure and space capacities, etc. Definition for health inequity analysis/es (question 12) • Health inequity analyses may include: o analyses using data disaggregated by sex, age, and at least two of the following inequality dimensions: income/wealth, race, ethnicity, migratory status, disability, geographic location, and other SDH and characteristics relevant in national contexts; or o analyses on barriers to access to COVID19 health services related to situations of vulnerability and/or gender, ethnic, or other forms of inequality and/or discrimination affecting their rights. • The questions should be answered as “Yes” if either of the above criteria are met (either related to reports or research produced by the Ministry of Health or another ministry). Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 10 In-depth modules on disruptions to tracer service areas 11 Sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health To be completed by: Sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to services for sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 1.b How does this level of disruption compare to during the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not the level of disruption during the first quarter of served as usual compared to before the pandemic) for the 2021 (January-March 2021)? following sexual and reproductive health services. Please respond for each service area. Family planning and contraception [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March 2021 [ ] 26-50% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March 2021 Safe abortion [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan-March 2021 [ ] Less than 5% [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels Post-abortion care services (including 0%) [ ] Do not know [ ] Do not know Fertility care/infertility services [ ] Not applicable Identification and care for intimate partner violence Response to sexual violence (post- rape care) 2. During the previous 6 months, Communication and information what mitigation strategies or 1. Informing the community, including adolescents, where, when and service delivery modifications have how to access SRH services been implemented to ensure 2. Providing information to public about accurate and up-to-date continued delivery of sexual and educational materials on COVID-19 and SRH reproductive health (SRH) services? 3. Informing and alerting all service providers about the heightened risk of domestic violence Please check all that apply. Access 4. Increasing availability of contraceptive methods and condoms that do not require direct supervision of health workers through pharmacies and other channels such as community-based delivery, and offering 12 alternative contraceptive options if a client’s regular method is not available 5. Enhancing identification and services for gender-based violence against women survivors across all age groups Alternative or adaptive measures 6. Relaxing requirements for prescriptions of SRH commodities such as oral or self-injectable contraception and abortion medications 7. Offering noninvasive medical methods for managing safe abortion (including incomplete abortion) 8. Waiving restrictions to accessing SRH services (if these exist) such as those based on age, marital status, or parental/spousal consent 9. Providing multi-month supplies of SRH commodities; with clear information about the method and how to access referral care 10. Using hotlines and/or telemedicine to minimize facility visits and provider-client contacts for various services including counseling, information provision and support; organizing multiple service provisions in single visit 11. Adjusting forecasting for SRH commodities and supplies 12. Reducing the cost of SRH services or providing SRH services free of charge 13. Implement task shifting/sharing for essential SRH services (e.g. stronger engagement of CHWs and/or pharmacists) Other 14. Other (please specify): 15. Do not know 16. Not applicable 3. 3.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 during 3.b How does this level of disruption the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not served as usual compare to the level of disruption during compared to before the pandemic) for the following maternal and the first quarter of 2021 (January-March newborn health services. 2021)? Please respond for each service area. Antenatal care [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March [ ] 26-50% 2021 Facility-based births [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March [ ] Less than 5% (including 2021 Postnatal care for women and 0%) [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan- newborns [ ] Do not know March 2021 [ ] Not applicable [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels Neonatal intensive care unit [ ] Do not know (NICU) services 4. During the previous 6 months, Communication and information what mitigation strategies or 1. Informing the community where, when and how to access maternal service delivery modifications have and newborn services been implemented to ensure 2. Promoting childbirth in health facilities irrespective of COVID-19 continued delivery of maternal and 3. Informing families and caregivers on how to cope with stress and newborn health (MNH) services? sustain a nurturing environment at home 13 4. Informing MNH CHWs on IPC measures, including PPE, and measures Please check all that apply. for protection in absence of PPE Access 5. Scheduling of antenatal care (ANC) visits in advance 6. Scheduling of postnatal care (PNC) visits in advance 7. Task shifting of non-clinical ANC interventions to community level 8. Tasking shifting of non-clinical PNC interventions to community level 9. Modifying (temporarily) MNH referral system to take into consideration changes in service delivery Alternative or adaptive measures 10. Offering multi-month prescriptions, micronutrient supplements, etc. during ANC or PNC 11. Early discharge after normal delivery 12. Early discharge of stable high-risk (e.g. preterm, low birthweight) newborns 13. Continuity of labour companion with appropriate screening for COVID-19 14. Enhanced maternal mental health screening and counselling in maternal health services 15. Using digital platforms for ANC or PNC counseling and screening to minimize facility visits (e.g. breastfeeding support; self-care and family care practices; informing for risk factors known to be increased in the context of COVID-19 and for the occurrence of danger signs) Other 16. Other (please specify): 17. Do not know 18. Not applicable 5. 5.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 during 5.b How does this level of disruption the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not served as usual compare to the level of disruption during compared to before the pandemic) for the following child and the first quarter of 2021 (January-March adolescent health services. 2021)? Please respond for each service area. Sick child services [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March [ ] 26-50% 2021 Well-child visits, including growth [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March and developmental monitoring [ ] Less than 5% (including 2021 and counselling 0%) [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan- [ ] Do not know March 2021 Adolescent and youth friendly [ ] Not applicable [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels services [ ] Do not know 6. During the previous 6 months, Communication and information what mitigation strategies or 1. Informing the community on where, when and how to access sick and service delivery modifications have well child care services been implemented to ensure 2. Enhancing information to caregivers on child care (e.g. signs of illness; continued delivery of child and when and where to seek care) adolescent health services? 3. Providing information on how to manage stress and sustain nurturing care in households during COVID-19 14 Please check all that apply. 4. Informing adolescents where and how to access health services 5. Informing adolescents where and how to get support and care in case of violence 6. Informing health workers about the heightened risk to children and adolescents of violence, including sexual violence Access 7. Enhancing provision of mental health and psychosocial support to caregivers of children and adolescents 8. Scheduling visits for child and/or adolescent services in advance 9. Enhance integrated outreach for delivery of vaccinations, growth monitoring, preventive and sick child services 10. Offering multi-month prescriptions for children and adolescents with conditions that require chronic care Alternative or adaptive measures 11. Using digital platforms for counselling, screening and follow-up after illness on matters related to child health 12. Shifting services for sick children and/or adolescents (e.g from hospital to PHC or from PHC to community care) 13. Establishing hotlines and/or telemedicine for individual counselling of adolescents 14. Engaging community groups and youth networks to extend the provision of health information and services to adolescents Other 15. Other (please specify): 16. Do not know 17. Not applicable Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 15 Nutrition To be completed by: Nutrition focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to nutrition services. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to 1.b How does this level of disruption compare to the COVID-19 during the previous 6 months (i.e. level of disruption during the first quarter of 2021 percentage of users not served as usual compared to (January-March 2021)? before the pandemic) for the following service areas. Please respond for each service area. Counselling on infant and [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March 2021 young-child feeding (IYCF) [ ] 26-50% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March 2021 [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan-March 2021 Screening for and/or [ ] Less than 5% [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels management of moderate (including 0%) [ ] Do not know and severe wasting [ ] Do not know [ ] Not applicable Distribution of high dose vitamin A supplementation 2. During the previous 6 months, Alternative or adaptive measures what mitigation strategies or 1. Providing/prescribing nutrition drugs and supplies for multi-month (e.g. service delivery modifications prescribe iron supplements to pregnant women for several months) have been implemented to 2. Making use of alternative delivery channels for nutrition services (e.g. ensure continued delivery of shift from facility-based delivery to community-based delivery of nutrition services? counselling for exclusive breastfeeding, use of telephone/digital services for IYCF counselling, highlighting that breastfeeding does not increase Please check all that apply. the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to baby, provision of take-home rations instead of school feeding) 3. Reducing the frequency of routine nutrition services, including screening for severe wasting (e.g. conduct less frequent but periodic screening of children for severe wasting) 4. Bundling nutrition services with other nutrition or health services (e.g. joint campaigns for distribution of high dose vitamin A supplementation and immunization) 16 5. Prioritizing key nutrition interventions (e.g. prioritize measurement of birth weight, screening for severe wasting, treatment of severe wasting, distribution of iron supplements for pregnant women etc. rather than providing all nutrition services) 6. Task shifting for essential nutrition services (e.g. make CHWs responsible for promotion of appropriate IYCF practices, screening of severe wasting etc.) 7. Postponing of some nutrition services (e.g. counselling on nutrition and healthy diets or any other services are postponed until the urgency of COVID-19 response is over). Other 8. Other (please specify): 9. Do not know 10. Not applicable Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 17 Immunization To be completed by: Immunization focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions in supply and demand to immunization services. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 and 1.b How does this level of disruption associated epidemic prevention measures (other than COVID-19 compare to the level of disruption vaccination) during the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users during the first quarter of 2021 not served as usual compared to before the pandemic) for the (January-March 2021)? following routine immunization services (childhood, adolescent, and adult non-COVID vaccination) services. Please respond for each service area. Routine facility-based [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan- immunization services [ ] 26-50% March 2021 [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan- Routine outreach immunization [ ] Less than 5% (including 0%) March 2021 services [ ] Do not know [ ] Still disrupted, no change from [ ] Not applicable Jan-March 2021 [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels [ ] Do not know 2. During the previous 6 months, Routine facility-based [ ] Yes which of the following routine immunization services for: [ ] No immunization services a. Infants/young children [ ] Do not know (childhood, adolescent, and b. School-aged children and [ ] Not applicable adult non-COVID vaccination) adolescents have been disrupted due to c. Pregnant women COVID-19 vaccination? d. Adults Please respond for each service. Routine outreach immunization services 3. Has the increased demand for a. Yes, for human resources vaccination resources b. Yes, for needles or syringes (vaccinators, cold chain, needles, c. Yes, for safety boxes to dispose used syringes and needles syringes etc.) had a negative d. Yes, for cold chain equipment impact on routine immunization e. Yes, for final disposal of injection wastage services? f. No 18 g. Other (please specify): Please check all that apply. h. Do not know 4. Please indicate the level of [ ] No disruptions: demand for immunization continues as before the disruption in demand pandemic (population seeking services) for [ ] Disruptions to demand for immunization, but less disruptions than routine immunization in Jan-March 2021 (childhood, adolescent, and [ ] Disruptions to demand for immunization, and more disruptions than adult non-COVID vaccination) as in Jan-March 2021 a result of COVID-19 and [ ] Disruptions to demand for immunization are similar to those seen associated epidemic prevention in Jan-March 2021 measures (e.g. travel [ ] Do not know about disruptions to demand for routine immunization restrictions, limitations in people being in groups, etc.) during the previous 6 months. 5. What kind of catch-up activities a. Periodic intensification of routine immunization (PIRI), such as is the country implementing, or vaccination or health days or weeks planning to implement before b. Enhanced routine immunization (providing additional routine the end of 2021? This refers to immunization sessions) vaccination activities aimed at c. Demand promotion campaigns (not targeted to only children who vaccinating children who missed missed a dose) vaccinations during the d. Targeted communication to families of children who have missed pandemic. one or more doses e. Mass vaccination campaigns (where children in the target age are Please check all that apply. vaccinated regardless of previous vaccination status) f. None g. Other (please specify): h. Do not know Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 19 Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis To be completed by: Human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis services. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 1.b How does this level of disruption during the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not compare to the level of disruption during served as usual compared to before the pandemic) for the the first quarter of 2021 (January-March following service areas. 2021? Please respond for each service area. Human immunodeficiency virus [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March (HIV) prevention services (e.g. [ ] 26-50% 2021 pre-exposure prophylaxis, [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March provision of condoms and [ ] Less than 5% 2021 lubricants, voluntary medical male (including 0%) [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan- circumcision, harm reduction [ ] Do not know March 2021 services) [ ] Not applicable [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels [ ] Do not know Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing services Continuation of established antiretroviral (ARV) treatment Initiation of new antiretroviral (ARV) treatment Hepatitis B and C diagnosis and treatment Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) 20 • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 21 Tuberculosis To be completed by: Tuberculosis focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to tuberculosis (TB) services. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to 1.b How does this level of disruption compare to COVID-19 during the previous 6 months (i.e. the level of disruption during the first quarter of percentage of users not served as usual compared 2021 (January-March 2021? to before the pandemic) for the following service areas. Tuberculosis (TB) [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March 2021 diagnosis and [ ] 26-50% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March 2021 treatment [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan-March 2021 [ ] Less than 5% [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels (including 0%) [ ] Do not know [ ] Do not know [ ] Not applicable Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 22 Malaria To be completed by: Malaria focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to malaria services. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 1.b How does this level of disruption during the previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not compare to the level of disruption served as usual compared to before the pandemic) for the during the first quarter of 2021 (January- following service areas. March 2021? Please respond for each service area. Malaria diagnosis and treatment [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March [ ] 26-50% 2021 Malaria prevention campaigns [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March a. Insecticide-treated-mosquito [ ] Less than 5% 2021 nets (ITN) (including 0%) [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan- b. Indoor residual spraying (IRS) [ ] Do not know March 2021 c. Seasonal malaria [ ] Not applicable [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels chemoprevention (SMC) [ ] Do not know Malaria surveillance Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 23 Neglected tropical diseases To be completed by: Neglected tropical diseases focal point(s) This section will focus on neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). These include a diverse group of 20 diseases and disease groups that are mostly communicable and primarily found in tropical and subtropical countries: Buruli ulcer, Chagas disease, dengue and chikungunya, dracunculiasis (Guinea-worm disease), echinococcosis, foodborne trematodiases, human African trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness), leishmaniasis, leprosy (Hansen’s disease), lymphatic filariasis, mycetoma, chromoblastomycosis and other deep mycoses, onchocerciasis (river blindness), rabies, scabies and other ectoparasites, schistosomiasis, soiled-transmitted helminthiases, snakebite envenoming, taeniasis/cysticercosis, trachoma, and yaws and other endemic treponematoses. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options INFRASTRUCTURE AND ACTIVITIES 1. During the previous three months, have 1. YES – All staff supporting COVID-19 efforts full time Ministry of Health (or equivalent 2. YES – All staff partially supporting COVID-19 efforts along institutes) staff with responsibility for with routine NTD activities NTDs been reassigned/deployed to help 3. YES – Some staff supporting COVID-19 efforts full time with overall COVID-19 response? 4. YES – Some staff partially supporting COVID-19 efforts along with routine NTD activities 5. NO 6. Do not know 2. During the previous three months, how 1. None or not yet much of the government (or Ministry of 2. 1 - 25% Health) funds initially allocated for NTDs 3. 26 -50% have been reassigned to non-NTD 4. 51-75% services due to COVID-19 response 5. 76 -100% efforts? 6. Do not know 3. During the previous three months, which 1. Advocacy and resource mobilization for NTD programme of the following planned Ministry of 2. Training and capacity‐building activities (in-person or Health NTD activities have been virtual) related to NTDs postponed because of COVID-19? (check 3. Surveys/population screening/surveillance for active case all that apply) finding If yes, please specify which NTD: 4. Integrated vector management If yes, please specify which vector control activities (e.g. mollusciciding, pond treatments, indoor residual/space spraying, source reduction measures, environment management) 24 5. Animal health/control of zoonotic NTDs 6. Monitoring, evaluation and research 7. Information reporting on NTDs 8. None 9. Do not know SERVICE DISRUPTIONS 4. 4.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 during the 4.b How does this level of previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not served as usual compared to disruption compare to the before the pandemic) for the following service areas. level of disruption during the first quarter of 2021 Please respond for each service area. (January-March 2021? Diagnosis, treatment and care for NTDs [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse (facility-based) [ ] 26-50% than Jan-March 2021 [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better Large scale preventive chemotherapy [ ] Less than 5% (including 0%) than Jan-March 2021 campaigns for NTDs (e.g. mass drug [ ] Do not know [ ] Still disrupted, no administrations, and/or school-based [ ] Not applicable change from Jan-March treatments) 2021 [ ] Back to pre-pandemic Community awareness and health levels education campaigns for NTDs (e.g. [ ] Do not know WASH promotion, disease prevention, vector control, eradication) Support for self-care, rehabilitation and psychosocial services for patients with chronic NTDs Prescriptions for NTD medicines Surgical procedures for NTDs 5. During the previous three months, what 1. Mortality related to NTDs [ ] Increased has been the impact of COVID-19 on the 2. Funding for related NTD [ ] Reduced following? activities [ ] No change or effect 3. Visibility of population at [ ] Do not know Please respond for each outcome. risks for NTDs [ ] Not applicable 4. Prioritization of NTD activities 5. Expiration of NTD medicines and diagnostics 6. Stock out of NTD medicines and diagnostics 7. Other impact on NTDs activities and/or outcomes (please specify) WHO GUIDANCE: UPTAKE, INFORMATION SHARING AND UNMET NEEDS 25 6. Are there any technical guidance or tools Please use the text box to give your suggestions that you would suggest WHO to develop related to NTDs during COVID-19 outbreak? Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption (question 4) • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] Please visit https://www.who.int/neglected_diseases/diseases/summary/en/ for more information on NTDs. 26 Mental, neurological, and substance use disorders To be completed by: Mental health, neurology and substance abuse focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions in services for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. Focal points may also reach out to national neurological associations/expert groups to gather information, if not readily available in Ministry of Health. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Policies and plans 1.a Is mental health and psychosocial a. Yes support response part of national b. No COVID-19 response plan? c. Do not know 1.b If yes to 1.a, during the previous 6 a. Yes, 100 % funded months, has additional funding been b. Yes, but less than 33% funded allocated for mental health and c. Yes, but 33%-66% funded psychosocial support in the d. Yes, but 67%-99% funded government budget for the COVID-19 e. No response plan? f. Do not know 1.c If yes to 1.a, during the previous six a. Orient responders to mental health and psychosocial months, which of the following aspects of COVID-19 activities have been implemented as b. Ensure inter-sectoral referral pathways are established and part of the current mental health and contextualized to the situation of limited physical distancing psychosocial support (MHPSS) c. Distribute timely and accessible information on general and response plan for COVID-19? MHPSS services, coping strategies and updates (Please check all activities that apply) d. Provide MHPSS to people in COVID treatment centers, isolation and quarantine See further examples for each activity in e. Protect the mental health and well-being of all responders the complementary glossary - section A. ensuring that they can access mental health and psychosocial care. f. Provide care and address the basic needs and mental health care needs of people with existing MNS conditions induced or exacerbated by COVID-19 g. Address the specific mental health and neurological needs of older adults, people with disabilities and other vulnerable persons h. Targeted Risk communication strategies/ campaigns to address social stigma 27 i. Establish opportunities for the bereaved to mourn even from a distance. Integrate response activities into existing services j. Ensure that risk of infection for people with mental neurological and substance use disorders in mental health hospitals and long-term care facilities are minimized k. Establish services for the identification, management and monitoring of people with post-COVID-condition with mental and neurological sequelae l. Do not know 2.a Do you currently have a functioning a. Yes multisectoral mental health and b. No psychosocial coordination platform c. Do not know for COVID-19 response? 2.b If yes to 2.a, which of the following a. Ministry of Health Ministries and bodies are part of the b. Ministry of Social/Family Affairs coordination platform? c. Ministry of Education d. Ministry of Labour Please check all that apply. e. Ministry of Finance f. Ministry of Foreign Affairs g. United Nations Agencies h. Governmental entity responsible for substance use i. Non-governmental Organizations j. Service users’ representatives k. National professional associations/societies l. National disaster management authority m. Do not know 3. Does your country’s COVID-19 a. Yes and 100 % funded response and/or recovery plan b. Yes but only less than 33% funded include provisions for services and c. Yes but between 33% and 66% funded supports for people with post-COVID d. Yes but between 67% and 99% funded condition, especially mental and e. No neurological sequelae of post-COVID f. Do not know condition? 4. During the previous 6 months, how Level Status have government policies/directives Mental health services at [ ] Services are open designated access to essential stand-alone psychiatric [ ] Services are partially open services for mental, neurological and hospitals [ ] Services are closed substance use (MNS) disorders at [ ] Do not know primary, secondary and tertiary care Specialized MNS services at [ ] Not Applicable levels? general hospitals Please answer for different categories of Specialized neurology services for mental, neurological and services at health facilities substance use disorders (see complementary glossary – section B). Specialized services for substance use disorders at health facilities 28 Community-based services for MNS disorders including in primary care facilities Service disruptions 5. 5.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to COVID-19 during the 5.b How does this level of previous 6 months (i.e. percentage of users not served as usual disruption compare to the level compared to before the pandemic) for the following service areas. of disruption during the first quarter of 2021 (January-March Please respond for each service area. 2021? Management of emergency MNS [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than manifestations (including suicide [ ] 26-50% Jan-March 2021 attempt, status epilepticus, delirium, [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, better than drug overdose, severe substance [ ] Less than 5% (including 0%) Jan-March 2021 withdrawal syndromes) [ ] Do not know [ ] Still disrupted, no change [ ] Not applicable from Jan-March 2021 Psychotherapy/counseling/psychoso [ ] Back to pre-pandemic cial interventions for MNS disorders levels [ ] Do not know Availability of psychotropic medicines for management of MNS disorders Services for children and adolescents with mental health conditions or disabilities, including developmental disabilities Services for older adults with mental health conditions or disabilities, including dementia Neuroimaging and neurophysiology School mental health programme Inclusive schooling for children with special needs Suicide prevention programme Substance use prevention and management programs Alcohol prevention and management programs 29 Critical harm reduction services (e.g., needle exchange programs, outreach services) Surveillance 6. Is your country collecting or collating a. Yes, for people with acute COVID-19 infection data on mental, neurological and b.Yes, for people with post-COVID condition substance use disorders or c. Yes, for people with acute COVID-19 infections and post- manifestations in people with COVID- COVID condition 19 and/or post-COVID-19 condition? d.No e. Do not know Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for status of service as defined by national level policies/directives (question 4) • Services open: Regular access to services • Services partially open: e.g for emergencies only or at limited capacity • Services closed: No access to services • Do not know: Information not available / to be found • N/A: Not applicable as services non-existent Definitions for levels of disruption (question 5) • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 30 Care for older people To be completed by: Care for older people focal point(s) This section will assess disruptions to services and care for older people. Respondent information Who is the focal point who provided the responses? Name: _______________________________________ Position: _______________________________________ Organization: _______________________________________ Country: _______________________________________ Email Address: _______________________________________ # Questions Response options Service disruptions 1. 1.a Please indicate the level of disruption due to 1.b How does this level of disruption compare to the COVID-19 during the previous 6 months (i.e. level of disruption during the first quarter of 2021 percentage of users not served as usual compared to (January-March 2021)? before the pandemic) for the following service areas. Please respond for each service area. Health and social care services [ ] More than 50% [ ] Still disrupted, worse than Jan-March 2021 in long-term care facilities [ ] 26-50% [ ] Still disrupted, better than Jan-March 2021 (e.g. nursing homes) [ ] 5-25% [ ] Still disrupted, no change from Jan-March 2021 [ ] Less than 5% [ ] Back to pre-pandemic levels Health and social care services (including 0%) [ ] Do not know in the community (e.g. day [ ] Do not know care centres and home visits) [ ] Not applicable Screening and assessment of physical and mental capacities for older people (e.g. mobility, cognition, mood, nutrition, vision and hearing) Provision of integrated health and social care services for older people (e.g. management of functional decline, noncommunicable diseases management, vaccination) 2. During the previous 6 months, Communication and information what mitigation strategies or 1. Inform older people, their households and caregivers with targeted service delivery modifications messages, regarding where, when and how to access health and long-term have been implemented to care services (e.g. day care centres, home visits) 31 ensure continued delivery of 2. Inform older people, their households and caregivers on IPC measures care and services for older 3. Inform older people, their households and caregivers on the importance of people? promoting physical and mental health (self-care and self-management), and monitoring for impact of social isolation Please check all that apply. 4. Inform older people, their households and their caregivers, on where and how to report and get help in the case of elder abuse 5. Inform health workers about the heightened risk of elder abuse 6. Ensure accessible information and different communication strategies for older people with impairments (e.g. low vision or blindness, hearing loss, cognitive decline or dementia) 7. Establish hotlines for older people and care givers to provide targeted information for older people 8. Provide accurate accessible information of COVID-19 vaccines and access to COVID-19 vaccines according to national vaccine policies Access 9. Use telemedicine and/or home outreach proactively to minimize health facility visits and schedule visits in advance for older people with underlying conditions, who live alone, and those who are care dependent 10. Offer multi-month prescriptions for older adults who have underlying health conditions 11. Establish mechanisms for medication delivery for older adults who have underlying health conditions 12. Facilitate access to rehabilitation services (home exercise programmes, assistive products, tele-rehabilitation). Alternative or adaptive measures 13. Engaging community groups and networks to extend the provision of health information and services to older people 14. Introduce (if doesn’t exist) psychosocial support for older people, for those socially isolated and with grief and loss 15. For older people who are care dependent, develop with the older person an alternative plan in case the primary caregiver is unavailable, and identify an alternative caregiver or alternative facility, or both 16. Provide education and training for caregivers at home and long-term care facilities on IPC measures and how to continue providing care safely 17. Establish and enhance the mechanism for relieving the burden on caregivers, including providing psychological support using digital platforms and respite care Other 18. Other (please specify): 19. Do not know 20. Not applicable Note: Unless otherwise specified, questions refer to the 6 month period preceding survey completion. In the case of survey completion during November 2021, this refers to the situation during May-October 2021. Definitions for levels of disruption • More than 50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • 26-50% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) 32 • 5-25% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic) • Less than 5% of users not served as usual (i.e. as prior to COVID-19 pandemic), including 0% / no disruptions) • Do not know: Information is not /not yet available • Not applicable: Service/intervention is not usually delivered in country Thank you for taking time to give your input for this survey. If you have any queries or questions regarding this survey, please contact [email protected] 33 Annex: Data sharing agreement Please note that all data collected by WHO, excluding emergencies and clinical trials, from member States requires the below statement in all data collection forms. For more information on the data policy go to: http://intranet.who.int/homes/spi/datasharing/ or outside of WHO: https://www.who.int/about/policies/publishing/data-policy Statement of policy on data sharing Data are the basis for all sound public health actions and the benefits of data sharing are widely recognized, including scientific and public health benefits. Whenever possible, WHO wishes to promote the sharing of health data, including but not restricted to surveillance and epidemiological data. In this connection, and without prejudice to information sharing and publication pursuant to legally binding instruments, by providing data to WHO, the [Ministry of Health] [other responsible governmental entity] of [Country]: Confirms that all data to be supplied to WHO (including but not limited to the types listed in Annex 3) hereunder have been collected in accordance with applicable national laws, including data protection laws aimed at protecting the confidentiality of identifiable persons; Agrees that WHO shall be entitled, subject always to measures to ensure the ethical and secure use of the data, and subject always to an appropriate acknowledgement of [Country]: - to publish the data, stripped of any personal identifiers (such data without personal identifiers being hereinafter referred to as “the Data”) and make the Data available to any interested party on request (to the extent they have not, or not yet, been published by WHO) on terms that allow non-commercial, not-for-profit use of the Data for public health purposes (provided always that publication of the Data shall remain under the control of WHO); - to use, compile, aggregate, evaluate and analyze the Data and publish and disseminate the results thereof in conjunction with WHO’s work and in accordance with the Organization’s policies and practices. Except where data sharing and publication is required under legally binding instruments (IHR, WHO Nomenclature Regulations 1967, etc.), the [Ministry of Health][other responsible governmental entity] of [Country] may in respect of certain data opt out of (any part of) the above, by notifying WHO thereof in writing at the following address, provided that any such notification shall clearly identify the data in question and clearly indicate the scope of the opt-out (in reference to the above), and provided that specific reasons shall be given for the opt out. World Health Organization WHO HQ/IHS/HSA 1211 Geneva 27 Switzerland [email protected] [ ] I verify that I have read and understood the data sharing agreement 34 WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA SANTÉ WELTGESUNDHEITSORGANISATION Date: 4 November 2021 ВСЕМИРНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ЗДРАВООХРАНЕНИЯ REGIONAL OFFICE FOR EUROPE Ms Kaija Kasekamp BUREAU RÉGIONAL DE L’EUROPE REGIONALBÜRO FÜR EUROPA Adviser ЕВРОПЕЙСКОЕ РЕГИОНАЛЬНОЕ БЮРО Health System Development Department Head office: Ministry of Social Affairs UN City, Marmorvej 51, Suur-Ameerika 1 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Tallinn 10129 Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00; Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Email: [email protected] Estonia Website: http://www.euro.who.int Our reference: Pulse Your reference: Notre référence: 3rd round Votre référence: Unser Zeichen: Ihr Zeichen: См. наш номер: На Ваш номер: Dear Ms Kasekamp, Third Round of the National Pulse Survey on Continuity of Essential Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic We are contacting you to request your leadership and support to facilitate country completion of the third round of the National pulse survey on continuity of essential health services during the COVID- 19 pandemic. As you know, the aim of the survey is to rapidly assess the impact of COVID-19 on the continuity of essential health services and track how countries are responding to mitigate challenges and recover services. It is also a valuable resource to inform action plans, resource allocation, and policy dialogues at country and global levels, and is a critical input for monitoring WHO’s COVID-19 Strategic preparedness and response plan. We will be very grateful for your usual collaboration in disseminating the survey to the Ministry of Health in your country and facilitating its completion by 23 November 2021. The survey and background information on suggested process for completion is enclosed and the unique country link is included below. Access survey: https://extranet.who.int/dataformv3/index.php/plugins/direct?plugin=PulseProjects&project=pulse&to ken=66566434 Token: 66566434 It is recommended that a focal point in the WHO Country Office and/or Ministry of Health be designated to coordinate the survey responses with key informants/national focal points. As feasible, please designate a WHO Country Office focal point to collaborate with the Ministry of Health in your country on survey completion. We will be grateful if you can keep [email protected] in copy to provide technical backstopping and answer any questions. UN City, Marmorvej 51 Tel.: +45 45 33 70 00 Email: [email protected] DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø Fax: +45 45 33 70 01 Website: http://www.euro.who.int Denmark Please contact Florian Tille ([email protected]) or [email protected] with any further questions, and we thank you for your continued collaboration. Yours sincerely, Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat Director Division of Country Health Policies and Systems Enclosure: 1. Final pulse survey Copy for information: Ms Elen Ohov, Adviser, European Union Affairs and International Co-operation Department, Ministry of Social Affairs, Suur-Ameerika 1, Tallinn 10122, Estonia Ms Kristina Köhler, Liaison Officer, WHO Country Office, Estonia, Paldiski Road 81, Tallinn 10617, Estonia –2–
Allikas: Sotsiaalministeerium dokumendiregister →
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel