Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Pöördumine
Sotsiaalministeerium · 17. veebruar 2026
- Viit
- 1.5-1.1/451-1
- Registreeritud
- 17. veebruar 2026
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Adressaat
- PowerHouse Latvia
- Saabumis/saatmisviis
- e-post
- Funktsioon
- 1.5 Asjaajamine. Info- ja kommunikatsioonitehnoloogia arendus ja haldus
- Sari
- 1.5-1.1 Teabenõuded, märgukirjad, selgitustaotlused
- Toimik
- 1.5-1.1/2026
- Vastutaja
- Heli Paluste (Sotsiaalministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Terviseala asekantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Tervishoiuteenuste osakond)
- Lahendamise tähtaeg
- 27. veebruar 2026
Failid
Sisu (failidest)
Saatja: "Luize Līce - Tane" <[email protected]>
Saaja: "Info - SOM" <[email protected]>
Teema: Request for written input - rare disease policy in Estonia
Kuupäev: 2026-02-16 20:45
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.
Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.
To the Ministry of Social Affairs of Estonia,
I am writing on behalf of the analytics and advisory group “PowerHouse
Latvia” to request written input for a cross-country analysis on rare
disease policy and implementation. We are examining how rare disease policy
is organised and implemented in Estonia, with the aim of identifying
practical lessons that may be relevant for Latvia.
This work follows the publication of our study on rare diseases in Latvia
and responds to policymakers’ interest in transferable international
approaches. We would appreciate the Ministry’s written responses to the
questions below; any direct quotation or attribution in the final output
will be agreed with you in advance (anonymous attribution is possible, if
preferred).
Written questions:
1. Policy framework: What are the main national strategies/plans and
responsible bodies for rare diseases in Estonia? Which regulations,
procedures, or formal mechanisms are most important for implementation?
2. Implementation in practice: How does the rare disease framework operate
in practice (coordination, patient pathway, cooperation with clinical
centres and other stakeholders)? What currently works well, and what are the
main bottlenecks?
3. Stakeholders and cooperation: Who are the key actors involved (public
authorities, payer bodies, clinical centres, patient and professional
organisations), and how is coordination organised?
4. Transferable approaches: Which approaches in Estonia could be relevant
for other countries to learn from? What conditions were required to
establish them (funding, organisational changes, procedures, political
decisions)?
5. Additional context: Are there any recent or upcoming policy changes,
reforms, or debates that significantly affect the rare disease field?
If possible, we would appreciate receiving your response by 27th of
February.
Kind regards,
Luīze Līce - Tane
Project manager
Analytics and advisory group “PowerHouse Latvia”
www.powerhouselatvia.com