Riigi Tugiteenuste Keskus · 14. jaanuar 2026
Sisu (failidest)
Swiss-Estonian Cooperation Programme Support Measure "Supporting Social Inclusion" Minutes of the Steering Committee meeting Date and time: 1 1 . 11 .202 5 1 1 : 15 –1 5 :30 Place : Ministry of Education and Research Munga 18, Tartu Participants : Members with Voting Rights: Olga Gnezdovski Chair , Representative of the Programme Operator, Ministry of Culture Evelin Liechti Swiss Contribution Office of the Swiss Embassy to Estonia Ieva Junevičienė Swiss Contribution Office of the Swiss Embassy to Estonia Helena Musthallik Representative of the National Coordination Unit, State Shared Service Centre Members without Voting Rights: Kristi Lillemägi Representative of the Programme Component Operator (Component 1), Ministry of Culture Ülar Vaadumäe Representative of the Programme Component Operator (Component 2), Ministry of Social Affairs Taavi Kreitsmann Representative of the Programme Component Operator (Component 3), Ministry of Education an d Research Minna Harjo Representative of the Programme Component Operator (Component 4), Ministry of the Interior Observers: Marili Anso Education and Youth Board Agenda: Opening remarks, introduction Progress of the Components Component 4: discussion on study/business trip requests, Swiss project relation to ESF+, and sustainability of lessons learned Discussion on Component 1 logframe indicators Discussion on Component 3 logframe indicators Presentation of general themes by PO (risks, spending of funds, cooperation with Swiss partner) Next SC meeting, AOB Item 1. Opening remarks, introduction The meeting was opened by Olga Gnezdovski , who welcomed the participants to the third meeting of the S teering C ommittee . She informed the participants that she will chair the meeting as the deputy member of Cha ir Kärt Kallion , since Kärt is ill. Olga Gnezdovski also informed the participants that the meeting would be recorded to facilitate the preparation of minutes. Taavi Kreitsmann welcomed the participants to Tartu and to the Ministry of Education and Research , which is celebrating its 107th anniversary today. Representatives of the Swiss Contribution Office (SCO) also addressed the participants with welcome remarks. Item 2. Progress of the Components Programme component operators presented the update on the implementation of the components. Each presentation was followed by a short discussion. Questions and discussion on presentations Component 1. The SCO enquired about the procurement that had to be repeated following the unsuccessful first round and asked whether the implementer had analysed the reasons for its failure. Kristi replied that one company had expressed interest, but it submitted its bid late. Olga Gnezdovski added that the low level of interest was probably due to the holiday period. The SCO highlighted the importance of acting proactively and planning procurements properly (for example, avoiding the holiday period) to prevent future procurement failures. Kristi added that INSA usually engages in lobbying potential bidders. The SCO expressed the desire to receive English summaries of the final reports and studies produced within the framework of procurements and projects. Machine translation could be used for this purpose, or the requirement for English summaries could be included directly in the procurement specifications. Component 2. In his presentation Ülar Vaadumäe noted implementation delays caused by a change of project manager at the Social Insurance Board but confirmed that the implementation plan for next year is prepared and awaiting approval, with signature aimed by year-end. The programme to facilitate entry into labour market in social sector for people with different language and cultural background has been postponed to 2026 , allowing the engagement of a social care institution, which trains specialists on site. Public awareness campaign procurement originally planned for early 2026 will be moved to the second half of 2026, with campaign rollout in 2027 to ensure demonstrable outputs from earlier activities. The SCO asked whether these shifts would affect the final completion date . Ülar Vaadumäe replied that no impact on the final deadline is expected at the moment , but the need for very efficient delivery in 2026–2027 is acknowledged , as 2028 is reserved for closure. The SCO stressed that any changes to the final deadline are possible, but they should be communicated well in advance . The SCO asked about the biggest challenge in this Component . Ülar Vaadumäe stated that securing the commitment universities and vocational schools to curriculum change is probably the most important action at the current stage. A joint meeting with them is planned for 28.11.2025. The SCO enquired whether the knowledge gained from the study trips to Switzerland, Finland, and Ireland could be integrated into the curricula. Ülar Vaadumäe promised to obtain input from specialists and send feedback . However, regarding the incorporation of Swiss experience, an online workshop focused on a practice-oriented social work curriculum has been scheduled for next year, as the Bern University of Applied Sciences has highly valuable expertise in practical workplace training. There was also a question regarding the language of the podcasts. Ülar Vaadumäe stated that they are only in Estonian. The SCO expressed concerns about turnover of pro ject managers and recommended looking more closely at the situation in order to identify the reasons behind it . As an example, restructuring of roles might help in certain cases. Ülar Vaadumäe promised to pass these concer ns on to the partners and to keep an eye on the situation. Component 3. Regarding challenges, Taavi Kreitsmann highlighted that one of the issues concerns preparatory studies. Preparatory studies are a new initiative in the Estonian education system, and the national curriculum framework is still being finalised. The state regulation is expected to be completed by the end of this year. Taavi explained that the regulation is linked to the increase in the school-leaving age to 18 years. The aim is to prevent young people from leaving the education system early and to improve their opportunities in the labour market. To achieve this goal, an additional year—referred to as preparatory studies—is provided for students who are not yet certain about their future educational or career path after completing basic school. During this year, students will participate in career guidance courses and other preparatory activities to help them choose further education or vocational pathways. A national curriculum framework for this additional year is being developed, which vocational schools and gymnasiums will use to design their specific school curricula. The SCO asked how parents are targeted, noting that less active parents are harder to engage. Marili Anso explained that the Education and Youth Board has very strong cooperation with local governments and schools. Invitations reach all parents of schoolchildren through educational platforms, and endorsements from teachers help motivate participation. Taavi Kreitsmann added that one way to address this is by providing training in various formats, including video trainings, training programmes, and conferences. The SCO recommended considering also English-language content to avoid excluding smaller cultural minority groups. The SCO raised a question regarding the motivation of parents to attend courses, particularly where there is a lack of information relevant to them or potential concerns related to their children. Marili Anso explained that the Education and Youth Board conducts focused interviews annually to understand and to map the topics parents are interested in, where they obtain information, and which formats are most suitable for them. Component 4. The SCO inquired about the language of the podcasts and videos. Minna Harjo explained that the podcasts are currently available only in Estonian, but she will ask the implementer to consider producing some episodes in other languages (for example, in English and/or Russian). She added that adding subtitles to videos and the TV series could be considered feasible. The SCO noted that in the future, for activities that could be effectively showcased—such as study visits—it would be beneficial to have English-language summaries or materials. This would help highlight the work carried out within the projects and demonstrate the value and impact of the cooperation also within Switzerland. Item 3 . Component 4: discussion on study/business trip requests, Swiss project relation to ESF+, and sustainability of lessons learned Before the meeting, the file providing the background information for this agenda item was distributed to the members of the Steering Committee . \s The key concern raised by the SCO is related to the financing and the sustainability of the National Foundation of Civil Society (NFCS). The SCO sought to understand the legal status of the NFCS, its main objectives and whether the Foundation has its own budget and why certain expenses are not covered by themselves , given that only a minor additional contribution is required. Minna Harjo explained that the NFCS is established by the Ministry of the Interior . NFCS does have its own budget, but they are financed through various projects as well . Within the NFCS , a Competence Centre for Social Innovation is established. It includes experts working on ESF+ funded project s , Swiss project , and also smaller Ukraine-related project s. The community of practice itself is not a separate project but rather a cooperation platform initiated by ESF+ and bringing together experts, practitioners, and academics in social innovation. Minna clarified r egarding financing, that the logic behind using the Swiss programme’s study visit budget is linked to cost efficiency. Instead of bilateral visits, the NFCS participates in platform events where experts from multiple countries are already present, enabling wider networking opportunities at lower cost. The SCO requested more information about the ESF+ community of practice, including its goals ( whether a programme document exists ) , management ( who holds overall responsibility for the platform and who maintains its information ) , time frame , and how it is related to the SSIP programme . It was suggested that the NFCS could be invited to a future Steering Committee meeting or a separate joint meeting to present this information . This would support a better understanding of the platform’s activities, its complementarities with the programme, and would help enhance potential synergies and collaboration between different projects and initiatives. Regarding the study/business trip requests , it was agreed that prior non-objection from the SCO for study visits/business trip s under Component 4 is not required within the following limits: the geographical scope is limited to European continent countries; the financial threshold per visit is 10 000 EUR of Swiss contribution; if the frequency, cost of visits, or the number of participants increases substantially, the SCO should be informed. Item 4. Discussion on Component 1 logframe indicators Before the meeting, the file describing the need to specify the s ources and m eans of v erification for indicators OCIN 1.1 and OCIM (b) 1.1 was distributed to the members of the Steering Committee: \s The Steering Committee agree d on : the new wording of sources and means of verification for OCIN 1.1 , as presented in the file referred to above, i . e . : Focus group discussion and /or self-evaluation feedback form reports approximately six months after participation in the activities, where applicable and feasible based on the nature of the activity and availability of participant contact information . the new wording of sources and means of verification for OCIM (b) 1.1 , as presented in the file referred to above, i.e.: Focus group discussion and /or self-evaluation feedback form reports immediately after participation in the activities. As described in the file distributed to the members of the Steering Committee before the meeting, the Estonian side proposed to agree that the results of Activity 2 (inclusion of volunteers in integration activities) under Component 1 will be reported only under Immediate Outcomes 1a and 1b, and not under Immediate Outcome 3, since the indicators for Immediate Outcome 3 refer exclusively to activities implemented within Component 4 . The SCO pointe d out that although Outcome 3 is formally linked to Component 4, some contributions may also arise from Component 1 . T herefore , the contributions from Component 1 should not be excluded from Outcome 3 . Finally, it was agreed that Programme Operator will present a revised formulation for how the measurement of Outcome 3 will be handled, including the incorporation of any relevant linkages from Component 1. Item 5. Discussion on Component 3 logframe indicators Before the meeting, the file describing and clarifying the need to change the target number of the output indicator OPI 2.12 was distributed to the members of the Steering Committee: \s Taavi Kreitsmann recapped the information from the file , explaining that the change in the target number results from the methodology for counting participations, not from a reduction in the actual number of participants trained. H e also clarified that participants may still attend multiple trainings on different topics over time, and each fully completed training programme counts as one participation. The Steering Committee agreed on the new target for OPI 2.12 , as presented in the file referred to above, i.e.: 5500 completed training course participations In addition, the SCO asked to re submit the justification in a shorte r and more focused form, so they can include the relevant change with its justification in their database . It should also be presented more clearly that the target is composed of inputs from Component 2 (1500 participations) and Component 3 (4000 participations). The SCO also reminded t hat the more detailed disaggregation of professionals should be done . Olga Gnezdovski confirmed that disaggregation along the sector would be done according to agreement made at the first Steering Committee meeting: P rofessionals in the field of child welfare P rofessionals in the field of social work P rofessionals in the field of education , with a further breakdown into specific groups such as teachers, support staff, youth workers, etc Gender Item 6. Presentation of general themes by PO (risks, spending of funds, cooperation with Swiss partner) Risk s . Olga Gnezdovski provided an overview of risks . She noted that, as briefly discussed during the last Task Force meeting in October, the highest risks currently remain related to timing and the procurement process. She added that a detailed reassessment of risks will be conducted during the preparation of the annual report at the beginning of the following year. To mitigate these risks, emphasis is placed on effective cooperation and information flow, regular monitoring through the Steering Committee, Task Force, and monthly meetings, and maintaining open communication between all partners. Regarding procurements , the SCO inquired about additional measures to mitigate risks . Olga Gnezdovski noted that each organisation prepares procurement plans for the upcoming year. Some organisations make use of services provided by the State Shared Service Centre, such as preliminary guidance on procurements and/or assistance in organising the procurement process. She stressed that regular monitoring of activities through monthly meetings is essential. The SCO emphasi s ed once again the importance of proactive action and proper planning of procurements—for example, avoiding the holiday period and conducting pre-market engagement—and highlighted the need to take into account comments previously provided by the SCO on procurements submitted for non-objection. It was also noted by the SCO that certain procurements, such as language courses or locally based training s , may not attract interest from Swiss companies . Therefore, completing the SIMAP form is not required for these procurements. Whether it should be completed will be decided in consultation with the SCO on a case-by-case basis. Cooperation with Swiss partner. Olga Gnezdovski provided an overview of cooperation with Swiss partner . Cooperation with Bern University of Applied Sciences has been strong. In 2025, 13 online workshops were conducted across programme components. These workshops enabled broad participation, provided insights into Switzerland’s general approach, and laid the foundation for more targeted expert exchanges in 2026. All workshops were well prepared and structured, showcasing interesting projects and organisations. Highlights from 2025 include a study visit under Component 2, which was highly informative . A positive outcome was also that the visit helped to strengthen team spirit and to validate our own ideas . In October, the Swiss expert participated in the Media Literacy Conference, giving a presentation and joining a panel discussion. The action plan for the following year is being finalised. In 2026, the focus will be on targeted expert feedback on implementer-prepared documents, online workshops on specific topics, a joint study trip in April for Components 1 and 4, participation in conferences , and online co-teaching by the Swiss partner at Tallinn University. Students from Bern University of Applied Sciences will come to Estonia in September to visit selected projects and organisations ( this visit will be mostly financed outside the programme budget ). Expenditures. Olga Gnezdovski mentioned that c urrent expenditures amount to approximately 1 million EUR, representing 4.4% of total budget . Major expenditures are expected in the following year and 2027, once procurement contracts are signed and activities commence. Additionally, since payments to universities under Component 3 are based on a unit-cost compensation mechanism, these expenditures will be recorded when universities begin issuing certificates for completed trainings. The SCO reminded that all reimbursement requests should includ e updated procurement plan and financial forecasts (+1, +2 years) for planning purposes. Mid-Term Evaluation . Olga Gnezdovski informed that the mid-term evaluation of the sectoral development plan „Cohesive Estonia Strategy 2021-2030” is ongoing, with interim results expected in June 2026 and final by September. As SSIP programme activities, particularly under Components 1 and 4, contribute to the strategy, the evaluation will also look at how these activities help achieve the objectives of the Integration Programme . Item 7. AOB , n ext SC meeting The SCO informed that, due to discussions related to Switzerland’s agreements with the EU, public and media interest has increased, including interest in the Swiss Cooperation Programme . Therefore, it was proposed to review and, if necessary, update the joint discipline of language (for example by adding additional questions ). In this context, the SCO also highlighted the importance of identifying and flagging potential success stories and cooperation examples involving Swiss companies and universities that could be of interest to Swiss taxpayers and parliamentarians. Increased attention should therefore be paid to the visibility of bilateral cooperation, including communication related to study visits. Olga Gnezdovski noted that a summary article for the current year is planned for publication on the Ministry of Culture’s blog, and that the Component 2 study visit could be included in this article. Helena Musthallik informed that videos introducing the activities of the Swiss -Estonian Cooperation Programme are almost finalised and will be shared shortly. Participants were informed about the appointment of the new Ambassador of Switzerland to Estonia, Anja Zobrist Rentenaar , who was accredited on the day of the meeting. It was agreed that the next Steering Committee meeting will take place on 5 March in Pärnu . After the meeting, the Ministry of Education and Research and Youth Board was introduced to the Steering Committee . Minutes secretary and Chair ( digitally signed ) Olga Gnezdovski Coordinator of Estonian-Swiss cooperation programme
Valid logframe following the Steering Committee decision of 11.11.2025 Hierarchy of objectives Strategy of Intervention Key Indicators (incl. target values and baseline) Sources & Means of Verification Assumptions & Risks (External Factors) Impact Impact Indicators Impact Sources and Means of Verification Improved opportunities for people living in Estonia, especially people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds to participate more actively in Estonian society. IMP 1 Contacts that persons of other ethnic nationalities have with Estonians Measurement unit: number of contacts Baseline 2020: 2 contacts Target 2027: more than 2,5 contacts. IMP 2 Participation of persons with different language and cultural background: Measurement unit: percent in employment Baseline 2020: 57,3% Target 2030: 62% in cultural life Baseline 2020: 72,9% Target 2030: 76% in sports Baseline 2022: 22,1%, Target 2030: 30% IMP 3 Proportion of people carrying strong or moderate state identity Measurement unit: percent Ethnical Estonians Baseline 2020: 78% Target 2027: ≥ 79% Persons of another ethnic nationalities Baseline 2020: 85% Target 2027: ≥ 86% Data received from the monitoring system of the development plan “Estonia 2035” “Participation in culture” survey Estonia`s Integration Monitoring Assumptions: Political Stability : The assumption that the political situation in Estonia will remain stable, ensuring a conducive environment for integration efforts. Maintained Migration Flows: The assumption that migration flows into Estonia will continue at their current level, allowing for effective integration planning. Risks: Bordering Countries' Instability : The risk of increased migration flows due to instability in neighbouring countries, potentially impacting the capacity of integration services to meet the demand. Resource Allocation : The risk of resource constraints affecting the ability to provide improved quality and access to services in integration, education, and social welfare, which may limit opportunities for active participation. Changing Government Policies : Potential changes in government policies and priorities that may affect the commitment and funding for social inclusion programmes. Societal Resistance : Resistance or challenges from segments of society that may oppose or hinder the goals of social inclusion and integration efforts. Outcomes (Support Measure objectives /purpose) Outcome Indicators Outcome: Sources and Means of Verification Outcome Assumptions & Risks Intermediate outcome 1: People from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds are actively participating in Estonian society. Immediate outcome 1a: Established processes enable people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds participate more actively in Estonian society . Immediate outcome 1b: People from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds are empowered to participate in Estonian society more actively. OCIN 1. 1 Percentage of participants who have claimed that after using the services they participate more in cultural life or their number of contacts with Estonians have increased or his/her position in the labour market has improved. Measurement unit: percent Baseline: 0 Target: 50% OCIN 1.2 Core Indicator MIGR_CI_1 : Number of migrants and forcibly displaced persons participating in new or expanded measures for social and economic integration (disaggregated by gender and background (Estonian, migrant)) . Measurement unit: participations Baseline: 0 Target: 20 000 OCIM (a) 1 .1 Processes (the first stage of service creation (methodologies, materials, surveys etc)) have been discussed with different partners and target group. Measurement unit: percent Baseline: 0 Target: 100% of services OCIM (a) 1 .2 Services are created and available to the target group. Measurement unit: percent Baseline: 0 Target: 100% of services are created and available OCIM (b) 1 .1 Percentage of participants who have claimed that they are satisfied with the activities and that they have gained knowledge for more active participation in the Estonian society. Measurement unit: percent Baseline: 0 Target: 75% OCIM (b) 1 .2 Services are made available online . Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes Focus group discussion and /or self-evaluation feedback form reports approximately six months after participation in the activities , where applicable and feasible based on the nature of the activity and availability of participant contact information . System for events database, registrations sheets. Programme reports. Programme reports. Focus group discussion and /or self-evaluation feedback form reports immediately after participation in the activities. Programme reports. Assumptions: Effective Integration Activities: Assumption that integration activities are effective in facilitating the active participation of individuals from diverse backgrounds. Supportive Legal Framework: Assumption that the legal framework and policies in Estonia support and encourage the active participation of diverse communities. Positive Public Attitudes: The assumption that the general public in Estonia is open to and supportive of the active participation of individuals from diverse backgrounds. Effective Communication: Assumption that there is effective communication and information dissemination to reach and engage individuals from diverse backgrounds. Risks: Limited Community Engagement: Risks associated with low engagement from some cultural and linguistic groups, potentially resulting in a lack of diversity in active participation. Discrimination and Prejudice: Risks of discrimination or prejudice against individuals from diverse backgrounds, which can hamper their active participation in society. Information Accessibility: Risks related to limited access to information or communication challenges that may impede empowerment efforts. Intermediate Outcome 2: Professionals in education and social sector offer services according to modernised and new curricula tailored also to work with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Immediate Outcome 2: Professionals in education and social sector have acquired new skills and knowledge and are ready to work with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. OCIN 2 . 1 Trained professionals using new skills and knowledge working also with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: percentage Baseline: N/A (unknown) Target: 70% of enrolled specialists that have passed a training module OCIN 2.2 Post-training feedback (after 6 months) given whether the professionals are in fact using the skills and knowledge acquired in their everyday work. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OCIN 2.3 Post-training feedback (after 6 months) acquired from employers whether they see that service provision to people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds has changed for the better. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OCIM 2. 1 Trained professionals with new skills and knowledge ready to work also with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: percentage Baseline: N/A (unknown) Target: 80% of enrolled specialists that have passed a training module OCIM 2.2 Professionals’ expectations asked before starting the complementary trainings. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OCIM 2.3 Professionals’ feedback acquired after having finished the training module on having new skills and knowledge to work with people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews / Programme reports. Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews. Programme reports. Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews / Programme reports. Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews / Programme reports. Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews / Programme reports. Training feedback surveys; focus group interviews / Programme reports. Assumptions: Existence of a sectoral support system - management support, horizontal cooperation network, support system backed by trained staff (supervision, etc.) Specialists open to changing their work methods. Risks: Lack of support and consistency at local level. Skills provided are not corresponding to the needs and therefore are unusable in real life. Intermediate outcome 3: Communities, organisations and individuals successfully implement the new knowledge gained in social innovation methods to design solutions to better integrate and include people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds in the Estonian society . Immediate outcome 3: Communities, organisations and individuals have gained new knowledge in social innovation methods to design solutions to better integrate and include people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds in the Estonian society. OCIN 3.1 Percentage of participants who claim that they have implemented at least some of the knowledge gained on social innovation methods in their organisations or communities to design solutions to social inclusion issues in Estonia. Measurement unit: percentage Baseline: 0 Target: 50% of respondents OCIN 3.2 Number of innovative ideas developed further at incubation programmes to help with solving social inclusion and integration problems. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 10 OCIM 3.1 Percentage of participants who claim (in end-of training evaluation) that they have gained new knowledge to implement social innovation methods. Measurement unit: percentage Baseline: 0 Target 75% OCIM 3 .2 Percentage of participants at hackathons and incubation programmes who are from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: percentage Target: 25% OCIM 3 .3 Number of innovative ideas proposed during hackathons to solve social inclusion and integration problems. Measurement unit: number Target: 15 Participant feedback surveys; post-event and e-mail questionnaire; focus group interviews. Programme reports. Participant feedback surveys; post-event and e-mail questionnaire; focus group interviews. Programme reports. Participant feedback surveys; post-event and e-mail questionnaire; focus group interviews. Programme reports. Assumptions: Communities, organisations and individuals in Estonia are open to use innovative solutions to integrate people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. People from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds in Estonia are willing to engage in social hackathons and incubation programmes. Risks: The level of willingness, knowledge and skills of the communities, organisations, and individuals to implement social innovation methods varies considerably. The surrounding societal environment does not support the implementation of gained knowledge. Outputs : Support Measure deliverables/results per outcome Output Indicators Output: Sources and Means of Verification Output Assumptions & Risks Output 1.1 Activities introducing the Estonian cultural space to people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds are provided. ( Activities introducing the Estonian cultural space ) OPI 1.1 Number of participations Measurement unit: participations Baseline: 0 Target: 10 000 OPI 1.2 Activities introducing the Estonian cultural space are designed. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OPI 1.3 Information about activities introducing the Estonian cultural space is available on the webpage of Integration Foundation and in social media networks. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OPI 1.4 Activities are available also outside Tallinn and Harjumaa county. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes System for events database, registrations sheets. Programme reports. Programme reports. Web-page and social-media channels of Integration Foundation. Programme reports. Assumptions: Cultural Program Development: Assumption that cultural programs can be developed and are readily available for introduction to individuals from diverse backgrounds. Commitment to Inclusion: The assumption that there is a commitment to updating and creating inclusion-oriented activities and measures. Risks: Cultural Adaptation Challenges: Risks related to the complexity of adapting cultural activities for diverse backgrounds, which may affect their availability. Resource Allocation: Risks associated with the allocation of resources and funding to create and update inclusion-oriented activities. Output 1.2 Counselling services are made available and used. (Activity: Provision of counselling services including in independent language learning) OPI 1.5 Number of participations in the counselling sessions (at least 30 minutes). Measurement unit: number of participations Baseline: 0 Target: 8000 OPI 1.6 A system of peer counselling is in place. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: Yes OPI 1.7 The counselling service has been upgraded and the capacity to provide the service has been created. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: Yes OPI 1.8 / Core Indicator CC_CI_1 Counsellors receive regular training. Measurement unit (1) : number of trainings Baseline: 0 Target: at least once a year Measurement unit (2): number of counsellors (disaggregated by gender) trained Baseline: 0 Target: 30 * a counsel l or who has participated in at least one training is counted * In the context of the given Support Measure, trained professionals are considered as a non-disadvantaged target group. System for events database, registrations sheets. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Assumptions: Qualified Counsellors: Assumption that there are qualified counsellors available to provide services. Counselling Facilities: The assumption that suitable facilities are available to offer counselling services. Risks: Counsellor Shortages: Risks related to a shortage of qualified counsellors to meet the demand for services. Resource Limitations: Risks associated with limitations in funding or facilities for providing counselling services. Output 1.3 Activities for parents, incl. from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds , are developed and provided . ( Activity : Informing, consulting and supporting parents, incl. parents from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds) OPI 1.9 Mapping of issues relevant to parents on multiculturalism has been carried out. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 3 (years 2024, 2025, 2026) OPI 1.10 Multicultual awareness-raising activities`programmes are developed and ready to use. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OPI 1.11 Number of multicultural awareness-raising activities for parents, including from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: Number Baseline: 0 Target: 30 (5 webinars, 5 workshops, 20 seminars for parents´ councils) Programme reports . Programme reports Programme reports, which include an overview of feedback. Assumptions: The ability and competence and availability of experts to develop training and information materials The organisers have a good understanding of the target groups and their needs. Risks: Finding experts with sufficient competence to compile as well as translate the materials. Reaching the relevant target groups. Scarce time resources of the target group and their ability to participate. Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by mid-202 8 Output 1.4 Media literacy programme launched. (Activity: Provision of media literacy training) OPI 1. 12 N umber of material sets created. Measurement unit: Number Baseline: 0 Target: 1 OPI 1.13 Number of libraries and community centres taking part in the programme. Measurement unit: Number Baseline: 0 Target: 70 OPI 1.14 Number of participations in the programme Measurement unit: participations Baseline: 0 Target: 3000 Programme reports; link to the materials/programme. Programme reports. Programme reports. Assumptions: Media Literacy Expertise: Assumption that there are experts available to launch the program and create educational materials. Interest in Media Literacy: The assumption that there is an interest and demand for media literacy programs. Risks: Expertise Shortages: Risks related to the availability of experts in the field of media literacy. Lack of Interest: Risks associated with limited interest or engagement from the target audience in the media literacy programme. Output 1.5 Digital tools are developed, piloted and rolled-out. (Activity: Preparation of digital transformation in the field of integration) OPI 1.15 N umber of digital tools developed. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 3 OP 1.16 Feedback of users of digital tools during pilot phase and roll-out phase Measurement unit: users involved in feedback process Baseline 0 Target: 75% are satisfied and consider it useful OPI 1.17 Number of analyses conducted Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 1 Programme reports. Survey on user feedback published in programme report. Programme report. Assumptions: Resource Availability: Assumption that the necessary resources for conducting the survey and piloting digital tools are accessible. Stakeholder Engagement: The assumption that relevant stakeholders will actively participate in the survey and provide valuable input for digital tool development. Risks : Resource Shortages: Risks associated with potential shortages in funding or technology resources that may hinder survey and digital tool pilot efforts. Stakeholder Disengagement: Risks related to a lack of engagement or cooperation from stakeholders, potentially leading to less effective analysis results and digital tool development. Output 2.1 Modernised curricula and new curricula for professionals in the fields of education and social welfare have been approved and are in force. (Activities: Curricula and professional qualification modification) OPI 2. 1 Curricula that will be modernised is identified. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: 0 Target: yes OPI 2. 2 Modernised and new curricula developed and approved Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 5 curricula updated in social welfare, 1 in education sector and 2 new curricula in education sector OPI 2.3 85% of approved curricula opened for enrolment of students. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.4 Public awareness campaign highlighting new possibilities and positive changes in social care- and child protection studies and work environment carried out. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.5 Target groups selected. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.6 Campaign reach measured. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.7 Campaign success evaluated. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes Programme reports. Programme reports, f ocus group discussions with experts; draft and approved curricula documents; follow-up evaluation agreements. Programme reports Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Assumptions: Knowing the channels to reach the target group Clear and relevant information about the target group Relevant problem mapping Political and strategic priorities remain as agreed upon are adequate Availability of target group Risks: Universities` lack of interest Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by the end of 2028 Price increases to activities Target group overwhelmed with work and extra trainings Political and strategic priorities change due to world changing events. Few experts, who are very occupied. Output 2.2 Professionals in the fields of education and social welfare have received complementary training according to new curricula. (Activities: Training and counselling system; In-service training for professionals in the education sector) OPI 2.8 Complementary training modules developed. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 15 modules developed OPI 2. 9 In-service training modules that will be developed mapped. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 10 T raining modules developed. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 11 Trainers trained on new modules. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 12 / Core Indicator: CC_CI_1 Professionals trained. Measurement unit: completed training course participations. Baseline: 0 Target: 10 000 5 500 * * 1500 from the Programme Component of the Ministry of Social Affairs of Estonia * 4000 from the Programme Component of the Ministry of Education and Research Disaggregation should be done along the following sectors: Professionals in the field of child welfare Professionals in the field of social work Professionals in the field of education, with a further breakdown into specific groups such as teachers, support staff, youth workers, etc Gender * indicator contributes to the SDG target 16.6: Develop effective, accountable and transparent institutions at all levels. OPI 2.13 Child welfare, social work and education sector training participants identified. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.14 Regional and sector-based training plan and schedule with communication plan developed. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2.15 Feedback from course participants acquired. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports, focus group discussions with teachers, focus group discussions with students. Assumptions: Knowing the channels to reach the target group. Clear and relevant information about the target group Relevant problem mapping Political and strategic priorities remain as agreed upon are adequate. Availability of target group Risks: Universities` lack of interest Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by the end of 2028. Price increases to activities Target group overwhelmed with work and extra trainings. Political and strategic priorities change due to world changing events. Few experts, who are very occupied. Output 2.3 A support/counselling system for social sector workers has been developed and is operational. (Activity: Training and counselling system ) OPI 2. 16 Support / counselling system for social sector workers developed. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 17 Needs of support / counselling services at local level mapped Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 18 Local level support and networking structure envisaged. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes OPI 2. 19 Support / counselling system for social sector workers in local governments piloted. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: no Target: yes Programme reports, progress monitoring meetings. Programme reports, progress monitoring meetings. Programme reports, progress monitoring meetings. Programme reports, progress monitoring meetings. Assumptions: Knowing the channels to reach the target group. Clear and relevant information about the target group. Relevant problem mapping. Political and strategic priorities remain as agreed upon are adequate. Availability of target group. Risks: Universities` lack of interest Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by the end of 2028. Price increases to activities. Target group overwhelmed with work and extra trainings. Political and strategic priorities change due to world changing events. Few experts, who are very occupied. Output 3.1 Civil society competence building activities carried out. (Activity: Building civil society competence, raising public awareness, and disseminating information on social innovation) OPI 3. 1 Action plan for civil society competence building activities, including target group mapping. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: No Target: Yes OPI 3.2 Number of civil society competence building activities carried out for communities, organisations, and individuals, including people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 14 (this number includes 2 social innovation hackathons, 2 social innovation incubation programmes, 2 training programmes, 2 workshops, 6 study visits for organisations, communities, and individuals) OPI 3. 3 Feedback by participants on the civil society competence building activities. Measurement unit: percentage of respondents Baseline: 0 Target: 70% of respondents are satisfied with the activity they participated in Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports, which include an overview of feedback. Assumptions: The ability and competence and availability of experts to develop training and information materials. The organisers have a good understanding of the target groups and their needs (in order to target the activities to organisations, communities and individuals that would be are interested in social innovation and the inclusion of migrants). Risks: Finding experts with sufficient competence to compile as well as translate the materials. Reaching the relevant target groups. Scarce time resources of the target group and their ability to participate. Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by mid-2028 Output 3.2 A set of social innovation training and information materials created, published, and disseminated. (Activity: Building civil society competence, raising public awareness, and disseminating information on social innovation) OPI 3. 4 Action plan for the preparation of social innovation training and information materials, including target group mapping. Measurement unit: yes/no Baseline: No Target: Yes OPI 3.5 Number of social innovation, training and information materials for organisations, communities and individuals, including people from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds. Measurement unit: number Baseline: 0 Target: 5 (Includes 1 podcast series, 1 broadcast series, 1 online training programme, 1 handbook on social innovation, 1 systematised collection of social innovation examples in Estonia OPI 3. 6 Expert opinion on the materials. Measurement unit: number of experts in the field of social innovation who have provided expert opinion on the materials created. Baseline: 0 Target: 2 OPI 3.7 Feedback on the materials. Measurement unit: percentage of respondents Baseline: 0 Target: 30% of NFCS newsletter subscribers have viewed/listened to the materials and are satisfied with the materials Programme reports. Programme reports. Programme reports which include overview of feedback. Programme reports which include overview of feedback. Assumptions: The ability and competence and availability of experts to develop training and information materials The producers have a good understanding of the public and their interests (in order to target the activities to organisations, communities and individuals that would be are interested in social innovation and the inclusion of migrants). Risks: Finding experts with sufficient competence to compile as well as translate the materials. Reaching the relevant target groups. Time constraints to implement SSIP activities by mid-2028 Output 3.3 Volunteers are trained. ( Activity: Inclusion of volunteers in the integration activities) OPI 3.8: / Core indicator CIV_CI_3: Number of trained volunteers. Measurement unit: persons Baseline: 0 Target: 3000 OPI 3.9: / Core indicator CIV_CI_3 : Number of trained volunteer leaders. Measurement unit: persons Baseline: 0 Target:100 OPI 3.10: Percentage of volunteers willing to continue volunteering in the future. Measurement unit: percent Baseline: 0 Target: 40% * If the volunteer comes from a different cultural and linguistic background, he/she is considered as a disadvantaged target group. Otherwise he/she is considered as a non-disadvantaged target group. Programme reports. Programme reports. Self-assessment feedback forms. Assumptions: Volunteer Availability: Assumption that there are individuals willing to volunteer and participate in training. Training Resources: The assumption that resources and materials for training volunteers are accessible and effective. Risks: Volunteer Shortages: Risks related to a lack of volunteers or difficulties in recruiting individuals for training. Ineffective Training: Risks associated with the ineffectiveness of training methods and materials, which may hinder the empowerment of volunteers.