5873115 428625 0 0 -3810 9724390 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Rg-kood 74000323 Tel 620 2002 E-post
[email protected] www.taltech.ee 0 0 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Rg-kood 74000323 Tel 620 2002 E-post
[email protected] www.taltech.ee -3810 428625 0 0 Sihtasutus Eesti Teadusagentuur Soola 8 27 . 0 5 .202 6 nr 11-10/48-22 51004 Tartu Ettevalmistustoetuse taotlemine Käesolevaga taotleb Tallinna Tehnikaülikool ( reg nr 74000323, ak EE201010052037382001 ) ettevalmistustoetust HE COST projektile European Legal Design Action – ELDA ( OC-2025-1-28904 ), vastutav täitja Ebru Metin, õiguse instituut. Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Marika Lunden Teadusosakond Lisa: Hindamisleh t left 284480 Riina Vilgats 620 3536
[email protected] 0 0 Riina Vilgats 620 3536
[email protected]
CONSENSUS EVALUATION REPORT
GENERAL OVERVIEW
Open Call Collection OC-2025-1
Proposal Reference OC-2025-1-28904
Proposal Title European Legal Design Action
Proposal Acronym ELDA
Evaluation Status Final
EVALUATION
SUMMARY TABLE
EXCELLENCE IN S&T AND IMPACT IMPLEMENTATION Total mark
NETWORKING (range 0-13)
Excellent (5) Excellent (5) Outstanding (3) 13
COMMENTS
Evaluation Criterion 1: EXCELLENCE IN S&T AND NETWORKING
The issue that the proposal aims at addressing is clearly outlined and seems to be crucial within the contemporary
legal and societal framework. The relevance of the proposal is amplified given its connection with the development of
AI tools.
The objectives the proposal intends to accomplish, are presented with sufficient details, are ambitious, but realistic.
Furthermore, they are articulated in a way that effectively combines research coordination with capacity building.
The proposal demonstrates an excellent command of the state of the art. It reveals a high degree of awareness of the
scholarly debate as well as the of the relevant EU official documents. Since the application clearly explains how the
proposed approaches and methodologies will advance current practices, it will predictably bring important progress
beyond the state of the art.
The proposed networking approach is well suited. The involvement of research units established in multiple European
countries can create benefits that would not otherwise be attainable. Indeed, the proposal clearly points out that legal
design challenges are systemic and not confined to a specific State of region, requiring supranational dialogue. In
addition, since many difficulties have their roots in EU legislation, a coordinated pan-European response mechanism is
likely to be the only way forward.
The proposed network displays outstanding critical mass and disciplinary breadth. With more than one hundred
members from several countries (although over a quarter of the researchers come from institutions based in two
countries of the same region), the research team seems well-equipped. Moreover, an interdisciplinary approach is
adopted, with a predominance of law expertise. The strategy to sustain the network is credible and well structured.
Mark: Excellent (5)
Evaluation Criterion 2: IMPACT
The potential impact of the proposal is thoroughly described in the application. The proposal identifies short-, medium-,
and long-term impacts on research, legal practice, public administration, and society as a whole. While the proposal
aims at reducing jargon contamination also within the contractual ecosystems, a noticeable effect is expected mainly
for certain types of agreements.
The proposal mentions a number of strategies to expand the action’s reach and to get a number of distinct categories
of stakeholders involved. The relevant categories are effectively targeted by the outcome of the action. The proposal
would have benefited from further details, in particular as to how to engage stakeholders outside the academia.
The application combines a plethora of communication, dissemination and valorisation strategies, without forgetting the
principles of open science. It includes mechanisms susceptible to reach different audiences and ensuring that results
are usable beyond academia. The proposal demonstrates strong awareness of sustainability and exploitation of
results.
Mark: Excellent (5)
Evaluation Criterion 3: IMPLEMENTATION
A cumulative, integrated, and progressive working plan is presented. The Working Groups are clearly differentiated yet
strongly interconnected, with well-defined tasks, milestones, deliverables, and timelines. The overall timeframe is
reasonable (although the proposal would have slightly benefited if the starting date of the WG 4 activities had been set
earlier).
Mark: Outstanding (3)
SELECTION
COMMENT OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE
SC To comply with the COST Excellence and Inclusiveness Policy, in the implementation of the Action: - the
level of involvement of Inclusiveness Target Countries (ITCs) should be maintained and a plan should be
developed and implemented to ensure the full involvement of ITC representatives in all aspects of the
Action's implementation (including in Action leadership positions); - the level of involvement of Young
Researchers and Innovators (YRIs) should be increased and a plan should be developed and
implemented to ensure the full involvement of YRIs in all aspects of the Action's implementation (including
in Action leadership positions); - the gender balance should be improved and a plan should be developed
and implemented to ensure gender balance in all aspects of the Action's implementation (including in
Action leadership positions).
2
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)