dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
Otsing›Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium
Sissetulev kiriAvalik

COM(2025) 981 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden

Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium · 14. jaanuar 2026
Viit
6-1/143-1
Registreeritud
14. jaanuar 2026
Dokumendi liik
Sissetulev kiri
Adressaat
Riigikantselei
Saabumis/saatmisviis
EIS
Funktsioon
6 Rahvusvahelise koostöö korraldamine
Sari
6-1 EL otsustusprotsessidega seotud dokumendid (eelnõud, seisukohad, töögruppide materjalid, kirjavahetus)
Toimik
6-1/2026
Vastutaja
Külli Kapper (Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Kantsleri valdkond, Strateegia ja teenuste juhtimise valdkond, EL ja rahvusvahelise koostöö osakond)
Lahendamise tähtaeg
28. jaanuar 2026

Failid

  • 📎1_EN_ACT_part1_v6.pdf592 KB
  • 📎26-00082-1.pdf3 KB
  • 📎Faktileht Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus.pdf67 KB
  • 📎Ulesande taitmise menetlusetapi dokumendid (48).txt1 KB
  • 📎Ülesande täitmise menetlusetapi dokumendid.txt1 KB

Sisu (failidest)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.12.2025 COM(2025) 981 final 2025/0397 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM 1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Union legislation should deliver its policy objectives efficiently, effectively and transparently. ‘The Future of European Competitiveness’ report emphasised that the transition to a low-carbon, resource-efficient, and circular economy will be essential for securing the EU's long-term economic prosperity, resilience, and competitiveness.3 With the Competitiveness Compass for the EU, the Commission presented its strategy for the next five years for unlocking the full potential of this transition.4 Moreover, the Commission has since strengthened targets to reduce administrative costs for business (together with public authorities) and Small and Medium sized Entreprises by 25% and 35% respectively (1). A solid body of Union environmental law now exists. The Commission takes seriously its duty to manage these laws effectively and invests heavily in reviewing (2) their application to ensure that they deliver as intended and that problematic issues are tackled early. Moreover, the Commission is committed to ‘stress-test’ all EU laws under its current term of office. The content of this proposal (and others in the ‘omnibus’ package) represents the initial outcome of the Commission’s ongoing ‘stress-testing’ in the environment area (3) built on extensive engagement with stakeholders through meetings at political level, roundtables, implementation dialogues, call for evidence and inputs received from stakeholders, including civil society, businesses and businesses associations, think tanks and public authorities. The omnibus package addresses legislation related to the circular economy, the operation of industrial installations, the management of geospatial data, and environmental permitting. The above legislation are crucial parts of delivering the Union’s commitment to a fair green, and digital transition and the shift towards a circular economy in particular. It is important that this legislation works well, mobilises the Union’s assets like the single market and avoids imposing unnecessary costs on business, public authorities and citizens. This specific proposed Regulation aims to make targeted revisions to the following instruments: – Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries (4). – Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 on reporting of environmental data from industrial installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 (5). This proposal includes limited and targeted amendments to the above Regulations in the area of environment. Further possible modifications of those Regulations are entirely outside of the 1 COM(2025) 47 final of 11 February 2025, A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on implementation and simplification. 2 COM(2025) 420 final of 7 July 2025, 2025 Environmental Implementation Review - Environmental implementation for prosperity and security. 3 Announced by President von der Leyen in her political guidelines 2024-2029 ‘Europe’s Choice’. 4 Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC; OJ L 191 28.7.2023, p.1. 5 Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on reporting of environmental data from industrial installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 166/2006; OJ L, 2024/1244, 2.5.2024, p.1. EN 0 EN scope and aims of the present proposal. The need for such modifications may be assessed, as appropriate, in the context of further stress-testing of EU environmental legislation announced in the [Chapeau Communication] and in Commission work programme 2026. The Commission will constructively engage with the co-legislators, in order to ensure that the legislative process on the present proposal fully preserves its essential object and does not distort it. Batteries Regulation Amending producer definition for distance contracts For producers not established in the Member State where they sell batteries, Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 currently covers solely producers using distance contracts. It is necessary to ensure that all operators irrespective of the selling technique used are covered by the definition of producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. The proposal therefore clarifies that a manufacturer, importer or distributor or other natural or legal person that sells batteries in a Member State and is established in another Member State or in a third country, qualifies as a producer, irrespective of the selling technique used, including by means of distance contracts. Adding a definition for substances of very high concern Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 currently requires that batteries should bear a label indicating the presence of hazardous substances. However, the definition of those substances for labelling is unclear since the corresponding recital specifies that batteries should be labelled with the amount of certain hazardous substances present. Therefore, the proposal adds further precision on the scope of the substances that need to be labelled by referring to substances of very high concern identified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. Exclusion of battery packs from removability and replaceability requirements Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 currently requires light means of transport (LMT) batteries to be removable and replaceable at cell level. This may create unexpected safety concerns when faulty battery cells are not replaced in the right conditions. Thus, in order to achieve the right balance between safety and repairability, LMT battery packs should be removable and replaceable by independent professionals, but at module level instead of cell level. Simplification of redundant reporting The Commission is obligated to review and report every four years about the quality of the information reported annually by the Member States concerning battery waste management. In addition, the Commission should assess the organisation of data collection, data accuracy and reliability and may make recommendations for improvement. The requirement for the Commission to review and publish a report on data from Member States should be deleted to allow for a more adaptable data review process. The Commission should retain the ability to assess data as needed and discretionarily determine the appropriateness of the publication of a report, considering data sensitivity, confidentiality, and alignment with evaluation and review timelines. Industrial emissions portal Operators under the scope of the IEPR are required to report to competent authorities' data on the use of water, energy and relevant raw materials. Article 6(9) allows Member States to EN 1 EN report on behalf of livestock and aquaculture operators in respect of releases to air, water, and land. Some Member States and stakeholders have questioned the feasibility of and burden associated to the requirement for livestock and aquaculture operators to report on the use of water, energy and relevant raw materials. In response, the Commission proposes exempting livestock and aquaculture operators from reporting on water, energy and materials use. Moreover, the Commission suggests allowing Member States to exempt operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations from reporting on off-site transfers of waste, off-site transfers of pollutants in wastewater, production volume and number of operating hours, provided that this information can be gathered by Member States by other means. Should this condition be met, Member States will be allowed to report more information than releases to air, water and land on behalf of individual livestock and aquaculture operators. There would be negligible environmental impact associated with this change which is about decreasing burden for livestock and aquaculture operators by relying more on MS action for gathering relevant information and improving the process for reporting. The cost savings associated with the measure would be for farmers and aquaculture operators, who would face reduced reporting requirements. Some of the data would be supplied by Member States who will have this information available through their standard agricultural analyses. Consistency with other Union policies This proposal is part of a package of measures aimed primarily at cutting red tape for economic operators. It is entirely consistent with the Commission’s policies on better regulation, and the objectives of the Competitiveness compass to promote greater competitiveness and economic resilience in the EU. The rationalisation introduced by these measures will not affect the achievement of the objectives in the concerned policy area nor the rationale of the legislative acts 2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY • Legal basis The legal bases of the proposal are Articles 114 and 192(1) TFEU. These reflect the underlying legal bases of the Regulations that the proposal intends to revise. The legal bases of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 concerning batteries and waste batteries is Article 114, and 192(1) in respect of Articles 54 to 76 of that Regulation. The legal base of Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 (‘the Industrial Emissions Portal Regulation’) is Article 192(1). • Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence) The Batteries Regulation was adopted in recognition of the expected demand for batteries in the coming years, the strategic role of batteries in the global transition towards decarbonised economies and the need to establish a functioning internal market and to avoid market distortions. As such the Batteries Regulation set out common rules on the sustainability, performance, safety, collection, recycling and second life of batteries as well as on information about batteries for end-users and economic operators. For these reasons, the revision of the Regulation is similarly justified on subsidiarity grounds. EN 2 EN Industrial Emissions Portal Regulation: The Union and the Member States are Parties to the Aarhus Convention, which recognises that increased public access to environmental information and the dissemination of such information contribute to a greater awareness of environmental matters, a free exchange of views, more effective participation by the public in environmental decision-making and, ultimately, to a better environment. In addition, the Union is a Party the UNECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers. There is a strong argument that action at Union level was necessary to establish a portal for the reporting of industrial emissions and clearly for any subsequent revision. Moreover, a consistent approach across all Member States is likely to lead to increased efficiency in reporting processes, and fairness for all operators wherever they are established in the Union. • Proportionality In the case of the circular economy legislation, the proposal would introduce alternative means to deliver the policy objectives of ensuring that waste products are appropriately managed at the end of their useful life The choice to promote national reporting of emissions and resource use by livestock and aquacultural operators is proportionate in that it intends to exploit processes that already exist within the legislation thereby keeping changes to a minimum. • Choice of the instrument A proposal for Regulation is the appropriate choice of instrument given that the underlying legislation that the proposal seeks to amend are also Regulations. 3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS • Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation Revisions of the Regulations on batteries and the industrial emissions portal were recently adopted by the Legislator based on Commission’s proposals that were supported by impact assessments. An evaluation cannot be carried out at this stage as too little time has passed, and too little practical experience gained. • Stakeholder consultations The Commission engaged in a broad consultation with stakeholders, civil society, public authorities and businesses, Member States and Members of the European Parliament, including through its Implementation Dialogues, stakeholder roundtables and many meetings (3). The staff working document accompanying this proposal provides more information on the various consultation activities that have been undertaken to support the preparation of this proposal. The key consultation activities are summarised below. The following consultation activities have been carried out to prepare this omnibus proposal: – An online webinar on environmental reporting (carried out by the consultant) on 13 February 2025 and an online survey of the participants to the above webinar who had agreed to be contacted for its purpose. EN 3 EN – A call for evidence6 for the environmental omnibus open for feedback from 22 July 2025 to 10 September 2025. – A high-level roundtable on simplifying environmental laws on 2 October 2025. The general consultations about simplification of environmental legislation drew a lot of attention, also from the wider public. The above-mentioned online workshop held on 13 February 2025 had 500 registrants and more than 300 active participants7. The follow-up targeted consultation led to more than 500 inputs, many of a specific nature. Several of the proposed simplifications in the omnibus are reflected in the input received. The call for evidence on environmental simplification drew most attention. The Commission published a call for evidence on the environmental simplification package on the Have-Your- Say website: Simplification of administrative burdens in environmental legislation. The feedback period was from 22 July 2025 till 10 September 2025. All feedback is published on the Have-Your-Say website. There were 190 998 contributions to the call for evidence, of which 189 751 (99.3%) came from citizens. 1 247 (0.7%) contributions came from organisations other than citizens, including businesses and business associations, non-governmental organisations (environmental and other), public authorities and academics. 622 attachments, mainly position papers, were attached to these submissions, which often included specific suggestions. From a business perspective, there is support for less burdensome regulation that leaves business with flexibility to deliver both growth and sustainable production. There is a perception of administrative obligations that are too prescriptive, and do not provide value added. On the side of civil society, there is support for a simplification that makes it easier to protect the environment and social standards and avoid deregulation, for example by removing redundancies and avoiding excessively detailed regulations. There is however concern that efforts to simplify regulations could undermine environmental protections. Citizens urged the EU to focus on enforcing existing laws rather than creating new simplifications. It is useful to note that the Commission has conducted consultations and prepared an impact assessment in support of the targeted revision of the Regulation on the registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals which is expected to contain a substantial simplifying component. Similarly, the Commission is currently preparing an impact assessment to support the preparation of the Circular Economy Act in 2026. This assessment will utilise ongoing consultation activities that will also cover simplification of existing (waste and circular economy-related) legislation. • Collection and use of expertise As indicated above the Commission contracted an external service provider to provide expertise related to this proposal. In particular, the contractor is screening the known body of environmental laws to identify reporting and other administrative obligations together with potential to simplify these obligations. In addition, the contractor has provided assistance in quantifying the reductions in costs of possible measures to simplify provisions in the omnibus package. All information provided by the contractor will be published. 6 Simplification of administrative burdens in environmental legislation 7 Environmental Reporting and Simplification - Trinomics EN 4 EN • Impact assessment An impact assessment has not been prepared primarily because the proposed amendments are highly specific with little choice available to remedy the underlying issues. A staff working document does however accompany this proposal. It justifies the different elements of the proposal and presents quantitative information about the expected impacts wherever possible. It also presents the views and inputs of stakeholders which the Commission has received. The consistency of this proposal with the climate-neutrality objective set out in Article 2(1) and the Union 2030 and 2040 climate targets has been assessed. The proposal is consistent with these objectives, as well as ensuring progress on adaptation. • Regulatory fitness and simplification Under the regulatory fitness and performance programme (REFIT), the Commission ensures that its legislation is fit for purpose, targeted to the needs of stakeholders, and minimises burdens while achieving its objectives. This proposal is therefore part of, and fully coherent with, the REFIT programme in so far as it attempts to simplify certain administrative procedures and reduce unnecessary costs for business. The savings associated with the changes to the Regulations are estimated using the Standard Cost Methodology and include EUR 70 million for the Industrial Emissions Portal. For the Batteries Regulation, the benefit comes from clarifying the legal text. • Fundamental rights No adverse impacts expected. 4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS Not applicable. 5. OTHER ELEMENTS • Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements The envisaged changes are very specific and directly applicable and will not need to be supported by implementation plans. The impacts will of course be assessed in due course as the underlying legislation is evaluation according to the usual way as part of the Commission’s policy on better regulation across the policy cycle. • Explanatory documents (for directives) Not relevant for directly applicable Regulations. • Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal Article 1 sets out amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. Article 2 sets out amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244. EN 5 EN 2025/0397 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 and Article 192(1) thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee1, Having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions2, Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, Whereas: (1) The political guidelines for the Commission’s 2024-2029 term3 point to the goal of simplifying legislation to eliminate any overlaps and contradictions while maintaining high standards and staying the course on the goals set out in the European Green Deal.4 (2) In response to the 2024 Draghi report5 pointing to regulatory obstacles and the regulatory administrative burden as one of the key challenges notably for small and medium sized enterprises (’SME’), the Competitiveness Compass6 identifies a set of horizontal enablers to underpin competitiveness including simplifying regulatory environment, reducing burden and favouring speed and flexibility. 1 OJ C , , p. . 2 OJ C , , p. . 3 Europe’s Choice, Political Guidelines for the next European Commission 2024−2029, Ursula von der Leyen 4 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December 2019, ‘The European Green Deal’, COM/2019/640 final. 5 Draghi, M. (2024) The future of European competitiveness. Available at: The Draghi report on EU competitiveness. 6 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 29 January 2025, A competitiveness Compass for the EU, COM(2025) final. EN 6 EN (3) In its Communication of 11 February 2025 entitled ‘A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on implementation and simplification’,7 the European Commission set out a vision for an implementation and simplification agenda that delivers fast and visible improvements for people and businesses on the ground. That requires more than an incremental approach and the Union is to take bold action to achieve that goal. The Commission, the European Parliament, the Council, Member States’ authorities at all levels and stakeholders need to work together to streamline and simplify Union, national and regional rules and to implement policies more effectively. (4) In the context of the Commission’s commitment to reduce reporting burdens and compliance costs, advance interoperability, and enhance competitiveness, it is necessary to adapt certain provisions set out in Regulations (EU) 2023/15428 and (EU) 2024/12449 of the European Parliament and of the Council whilst maintaining the policy objectives10 of the European Green Deal, and the Sustainable Finance Action Plan11. (5) With a view to maintaining coherence with the original instruments and in order to preserve the legislative intent, amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 are based on Article 114 of the Treaty and amendments to Chapter VIII of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 are based on Article 192(1) of the Treaty. (6) With a view to ensuring that all operators irrespective of the selling technique used are covered by the definition of a producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, it should be clarified that a manufacturer, importer or distributor or other natural or legal person that sells batteries in a Member State, and is established in another Member State or in a third country, qualifies as a producer not only when selling by means of distance contracts. (7) Pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542, batteries should bear a label indicating the presence of hazardous substances. In line with Recital (44) of that regulation, it is necessary to add further precision on the scope of the substances that need to be labelled by referring to substances of very high concern identified in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 or Regulation (EC) 1272/2008. (8) The requirement for light means of transport (LMT) batteries and battery packs to be removable and replaceable at cell level may create unexpected safety concerns when 7 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 February 2025, ‘A simpler and faster Europe: Communication on implementation and simplification’, COM/2025/47 final. 8 Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 concerning batteries and waste batteries, amending Directive 2008/98/EC and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 and repealing Directive 2006/66/EC (OJ L 191, 28.7.2023, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1542/oj). 9 Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on reporting of environmental data from industrial installations, establishing an Industrial Emissions Portal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 (OJ L, 2024/1244, 2.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1244/oj). 10 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 11 December 2019, ‘The European Green Deal’, COM/2019/640 final. 11 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions of 8 March 2018, ‘Action Plan: Financing Sustainable Growth’, COM/2018/097 final. EN 7 EN faulty battery cells are not replaced in the right conditions. Thus, in order to achieve the right balance between safety and repairability, it is appropriate to require that LMT batteries and LMT battery packs be readily removable and replaceable by independent professionals at module level. (9) Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 requires the Commission to publish a report on the results of the review of the information made available by the Member States. In practice, Article 76(4) has been too prescriptive and meant that analysis of data on implementation is required at a time which does not align with evaluation cycles, and only covers part of the information. This requirement should therefore be deleted, allowing for more flexible data reviewing. Informed decision-making is integral to the governance processes within the Union. Therefore, the Commission should continue to review the data reported by the Member States. (10) With a view to simplifying requirements on operators and companies, and reduce the administrative burden stemming from reporting pursuant to Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1244, while maintaining equivalent standards as regards the protection of human health and the environment, it is appropriate to allow Member States to exempt operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations from reporting on off- site transfers of waste, off-site transfers of pollutants in wastewater, production volume and number of operating hours, provided that this information can be gathered by other means, in view of fulfilling the requirements set out in Article 7 of that Regulation. Furthermore, to minimize the administrative burden on operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations, they should not be required to report on the use of water, energy and relevant raw materials. (11) Regulations (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1244 should therefore be amended accordingly, HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION: Article 1 Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is amended as follows: (1) Article 3(1) is amended as follows: (a) in point (47), point (d) is replaced by the following: ‘(d) sells batteries, including those incorporated in appliances, light means of transport or other vehicles, directly to end-users, whether or not they are private households, in a Member State, and is established in another Member State or in a third country;’(b) the following point (69) is added: ‘substance of very high concern’ means any substance which fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and is identified in accordance with Article 59(1) of that Regulation, or any substance which fulfils the criteria laid down in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and listed in Annex VI of Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.’ (2) in Article 11, paragraph 5 is replaced by the following: ‘5. Any natural or legal person that places on the market products incorporating LMT batteries shall ensure that those batteries, as well as individual battery modules included in the EN 8 EN battery pack, are readily removable and replaceable by an independent professional at any time during the lifetime of the product;’ (3) in Article 76(4), the second, third and fourth sentences are deleted. (4) in Annex VI Point 8 in Part A is replaced by the following: ‘8. the substances of very high concern in the meaning of Article 3 (1) (69) which are present in the battery, other than mercury, cadmium and lead, with a concentration equal or above 0,1%, weight on weight.’ (5) Article 2 Amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 In Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1244, paragraph 9 is replaced by the following: ‘9. The reporting requirements set out in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (d) shall not apply to operators of installations carrying out activities referred to in rows 2 and 7 of Annex I (‘operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations’). Member States may decide to quantify deliberate releases as referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, point (a), themselves on behalf of operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations. In such cases, paragraphs 1 to 8 shall not apply to those operators in respect of such releases. Member States may decide to exempt operators of livestock production and aquaculture installations from reporting on any of the items referred to in paragraph 1, first subparagraph, points (b), (c), (e), (f) and (g), of this Article, provided that such information can be gathered by Member States by other means in order to fulfil their obligations pursuant to Article 7. In such cases, paragraphs 1 to 8 of this Article shall not apply to those operators in respect of such items.’ Article 3 This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States. Done at Brussels, For the European Parliament For the Council The President The President EN 9 EN LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL AND DIGITAL STATEMENT 1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE ................................................. 3 1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative ...................................................................................... 3 1.2. Policy area(s) concerned .............................................................................................. 3 1.3. Objective(s) .................................................................................................................. 3 1.3.1. General objective(s) ..................................................................................................... 3 1.3.2. Specific objective(s) ..................................................................................................... 3 1.3.3. Expected result(s) and impact ...................................................................................... 3 1.3.4. Indicators of performance ............................................................................................ 3 1.4. The proposal/initiative relates to: ................................................................................. 4 1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative .............................................................................. 4 1.5.1. Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term including a detailed timeline for roll-out of the implementation of the initiative ............................................................ 4 1.5.2. Added value of EU involvement (it may result from different factors, e.g. coordination gains, legal certainty, greater effectiveness or complementarities). For the purposes of this section 'added value of EU involvement' is the value resulting from EU action, that is additional to the value that would have been otherwise created by Member States alone. ................................................................................. 4 1.5.3. Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past .................................................. 4 1.5.4. Compatibility with the multiannual financial framework and possible synergies with other appropriate instruments ....................................................................................... 5 1.5.5. Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for redeployment ................................................................................................................ 5 1.6. Duration of the proposal/initiative and of its financial impact .................................... 6 1.7. Method(s) of budget implementation planned ............................................................. 6 2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES................................................................................... 8 2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules .................................................................................... 8 2.2. Management and control system(s) ............................................................................. 8 2.2.1. Justification of the budget implementation method(s), the funding implementation mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed .................. 8 2.2.2. Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up to mitigate them............................................................................................................ 8 2.2.3. Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio between the control costs and the value of the related funds managed), and assessment of the expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure) ........................................... 8 2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities ................................................................ 9 3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE ............ 10 3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected ....................................................................................................................... 10 EN 1 EN 3.2. Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations ................................... 12 3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations.................................... 12 3.2.1.1. Appropriations from voted budget ............................................................................. 12 3.2.1.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues ....................................................... 17 3.2.2. Estimated output funded from operational appropriations......................................... 22 3.2.3. Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations ............................... 24 3.2.3.1. Appropriations from voted budget .............................................................................. 24 3.2.3.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues ....................................................... 24 3.2.3.3. Total appropriations ................................................................................................... 24 3.2.4. Estimated requirements of human resources.............................................................. 25 3.2.4.1. Financed from voted budget....................................................................................... 25 3.2.4.2. Financed from external assigned revenues ................................................................ 26 3.2.4.3. Total requirements of human resources ..................................................................... 26 3.2.5. Overview of estimated impact on digital technology-related investments ................ 28 3.2.6. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework.............................. 28 3.2.7. Third-party contributions ........................................................................................... 28 3.3. Estimated impact on revenue ..................................................................................... 29 4. DIGITAL DIMENSIONS .......................................................................................... 29 4.1. Requirements of digital relevance .............................................................................. 30 4.2. Data ............................................................................................................................ 30 4.3. Digital solutions ......................................................................................................... 31 4.4. Interoperability assessment ........................................................................................ 31 4.5. Measures to support digital implementation .............................................................. 32 EN 2 EN 1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden 1.2. Policy area(s) concerned Environment European Green Deal 1.3. Objective(s) 1.3.1. General objective(s) The general objectives pursued by this legislative proposal are to simplify and clarify certain elements of Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and (EU) 2024/1244 in order to clarify producer and manufacturer obligations as regards batteries and alleviate burden on certain operators under the scope of the IEPR as regards reporting. By reducing the administrative burden and compliance costs associated with technical and reporting requirements, this proposal intends to ensure the proportionality of the framework, while maintaining high standards of environmental protection. 1.3.2. Specific objective(s) The specific objectives of the proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 included in this proposal aim to achieve the following results: Amend the producer definition for distance contracts Exclude battery packs from removability and replaceability requirements Simplification of redundant reporting from the Commission The specific objectives of the proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 included in this proposal are as follows: - exempting livestock and aquaculture operators from reporting on water, energy and materials use. - allowing Member States to exempt operators of livestock and aquaculture installations from reporting on off-site transfers of waste, off-site transfers of pollutants in wastewater, production volume and number of operating hours, provided that this information can be gathered by Member States by other means. Should this condition be met, Member States would be allowed to report on these elements on behalf of individual livestock and aquaculture operators. 1.3.3. Expected result(s) and impact Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted. The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 will benefit a wide range of stakeholders, including producers of batteries. Producers will have clarity that all operators irrespective of the selling technique used are covered by the definition of producer in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. This will create legal certainty as to which EN 3 EN producers have extended producer responsibility. The exclusion of battery packs from removability and replaceability requirements will create legal certainty for battery manufacturers and address safety concerns when faulty battery cells are not replaced in the right conditions. The proposed amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 are expected to benefit operators of livestock and aquaculture installations by alleviating their reporting burden. 1.3.4. Indicators of performance Specify the indicators for monitoring progress and achievements. To monitor progress towards achieving the proposal’s specific objectives, the Commission will explore the possibility of organising exchanges with Member States in different formats, including by using the existing fora.1.4. The proposal/initiative relates to:  a new action  a new action following a pilot project / preparatory action19  the extension of an existing action  a merger or redirection of one or more actions towards another/a new action 1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative 1.5.1. Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term including a detailed timeline for roll-out of the implementation of the initiative N/A1.5.2. Added value of EU involvement (it may result from different factors, e.g. coordination gains, legal certainty, greater effectiveness or complementarities). For the purposes of this section 'added value of EU involvement' is the value resulting from EU action, that is additional to the value that would have been otherwise created by Member States alone. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 already contains a producer definition. The amendment will provide legal certainty as to who is covered by the definition. The current removability and replaceability requirement for light means of transport batteries under Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 applied to the cell level. Battery manufactures will have legal certainty about the level of removability and replaceability requirements for light means of transport batteries and a coordinated approach will be taken across the Union. The amendments to Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 aim at ensuring coordination gains and greater complementarity on reporting by clarifying what has to be reported by livestock and aquaculture operators or by Member States. 1.5.3. Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past N/A 19 As referred to in Article 58(2), point (a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation. EN 4 EN 1.5.4. Compatibility with the multiannual financial framework and possible synergies with other appropriate instruments N/A 1.5.5. Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for redeployment N/A EN 5 EN 1.6. Duration of the proposal/initiative and of its financial impact  limited duration –  in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY –  financial impact from YYYY to YYYY for commitment appropriations and from YYYY to YYYY for payment appropriations.  unlimited duration – Implementation with a start-up period from YYYY to YYYY, – followed by full-scale operation. 1.7. Method(s) of budget implementation planned20  Direct management by the Commission –  by its departments, including by its staff in the Union delegations; –  by the executive agencies  Shared management with the Member States  Indirect management by entrusting budget implementation tasks to: –  third countries or the bodies they have designated –  international organisations and their agencies (to be specified) –  the European Investment Bank and the European Investment Fund –  bodies referred to in Articles 70 and 71 of the Financial Regulation –  public law bodies –  bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the extent that they are provided with adequate financial guarantees –  bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that are provided with adequate financial guarantees –  bodies or persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the common foreign and security policy pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union, and identified in the relevant basic act – bodies established in a Member State, governed by the private law of a Member State or Union law and eligible to be entrusted, in accordance with sector-specific rules, with the implementation of Union funds or budgetary guarantees, to the extent that such bodies are controlled by public law bodies or by bodies governed by private law with a public service mission, and are provided with adequate financial guarantees in the form of joint and several liability by the controlling bodies or equivalent financial guarantees and which may be, for each action, limited to the maximum amount of the Union support. Comments 20 Details of budget implementation methods and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on the BUDGpedia site: https://myintracomm.ec.europa.eu/corp/budget/financial-rules/budget- implementation/Pages/implementation-methods.aspx. EN 6 EN N/A EN 7 EN 2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES 2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules N/A 2.2. Management and control system(s) 2.2.1. Justification of the budget implementation method(s), the funding implementation mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed N/A 2.2.2. Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up to mitigate them N/A 2.2.3. Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio between the control costs and the value of the related funds managed), and assessment of the expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure) N/A 2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities N/A EN 8 EN 3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected • Existing budget lines In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines. Type of Budget line expenditure Contribution Heading of from multiannual candidate from From financial Number countries Diff./Non- EFTA other other assigned framework and diff.21 countries third revenue 22 potential countries candidates 23 N/A Diff./Non YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO -diff. • New budget lines requested In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines. Type of Budget line expenditure Contribution Heading of from multiannual candidate from financial Number from Diff./Non- countries other other assigned framework EFTA diff. and third revenue countries potential countries candidates N/A Diff./Non YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO YES/NO -diff. 21 Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-differentiated appropriations. 22 EFTA: European Free Trade Association. 23 Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidates from the Western Balkans. EN 9 EN 3.2. Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations 3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations –  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations –  The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below 3.2.1.1. Appropriations from voted budget EUR million (to three decimal places) Heading of multiannual financial framework Number Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 24 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Budget line Commitments (1a) 0.000 24 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 10 EN Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 25 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2024 2025 2026 2027 Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL operational appropriations Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 from the envelope for specific programmes TOTAL appropriations under Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Heading of multiannual financial Number framework Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations 25 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 11 EN Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 26 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b +3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes27 Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b +3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 26 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. 27 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 12 EN Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL operational appropriations Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 from the envelope for specific programmes TOTAL appropriations under Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 • TOTAL operational appropriations (all Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 operational headings) Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 • TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 headings) TOTAL appropriations Under Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Heading 1 to 6 of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 (Reference amount) Heading of multiannual financial framework 7 ‘Administrative expenditure’28 Year Year Year Year TOTAL DG: <…….> MFF 2021- 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 28 The necessary appropriations should be determined using the annual average cost figures available on the appropriate BUDGpedia webpage. EN 13 EN  Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL DG: <…….> MFF 2021- 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027  Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 (Total TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 7 of the multiannual financial commitments = Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 framework payments) EUR million (to three decimal places) Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 7 Commitments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 of the multiannual financial framework Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.2.1.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues EUR million (to three decimal places) Heading of multiannual financial framework Number Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 EN 14 EN Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 29 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes30 Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2024 2025 2026 2027 Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL operational appropriations Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 29 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. 30 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 15 EN TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 from the envelope for specific programmes TOTAL appropriations under Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Heading of multiannual financial framework Number Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 31 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF DG: <…….> 2021-2027 2024 2025 2026 2027 Operational appropriations Commitments (1a) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2a) 0.000 31 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 16 EN Commitments (1b) 0.000 Budget line Payments (2b) 0.000 32 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes Budget line (3) 0.000 TOTAL appropriations Commitments =1a+1b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 for DG <…….> Payments =2a+2b+3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL operational appropriations Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 from the envelope for specific programmes TOTAL appropriations under Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 • TOTAL operational appropriations (all Commitments (4) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 operational headings) Payments (5) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 • TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational (6) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 headings) 32 Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research. EN 17 EN TOTAL appropriations under Headings 1 Commitments =4+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 to 6 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference Payments =5+6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 amount) Heading of multiannual financial framework 7 ‘Administrative expenditure’33 EUR million (to three decimal places) Year Year Year Year TOTAL DG: <…….> MFF 2021- 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027  Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Year Year Year Year TOTAL DG: <…….> MFF 2021- 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027  Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000  Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL DG <…….> Appropriations 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 (Total TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 7 of the multiannual commitments = Total 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 financial framework payments) EUR million (to three decimal places) Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF 33 The necessary appropriations should be determined using the annual average cost figures available on the appropriate BUDGpedia webpage. EN 18 EN 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021-2027 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 7 Commitments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 of the multiannual financial framework Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.2.2. Estimated output funded from operational appropriations (not to be completed for decentralised agencies) Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places) Year Year Year Year Enter as many years as necessary to show the TOTAL 2024 2025 2026 2027 duration of the impact (see Section1.6) Indicate objectives and OUTPUTS outputs Avera Type34 Total Total No No No No No No No  ge Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost Cost No cost cost SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 135… - Output - Output - Output Subtotal for specific objective No 1 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2 ... - Output Subtotal for specific objective No 2 34 Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g. number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.). 35 As described in Section 1.3.2. ‘Specific objective(s)’ EN 19 EN TOTALS EN 20 EN 3.2.3. Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations –  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an administrative nature –  The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below 3.2.3.1. Appropriations from voted budget Year Year Year Year TOTAL VOTED APPROPRIATIONS 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021 - 2027 HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Outside HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.2.3.2. Appropriations from external assigned revenues Year Year Year Year TOTAL EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES 2024 2025 2026 2027 2021 - 2027 HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Outside HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.2.3.3. Total appropriations TOTAL Year Year Year Year TOTAL VOTED APPROPRIATIONS 2021 - + 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Other administrative expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Outside HEADING 7 Human resources 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 EN 21 EN Other expenditure of an administrative nature 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 The appropriations required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together, if necessary, with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints. 3.2.4. Estimated requirements of human resources –  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources –  The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below 3.2.4.1. Financed from voted budget Estimate to be expressed in full-time equivalent units (FTEs)36 Year Year Year Year VOTED APPROPRIATIONS 2024 2025 2026 2027  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff) 20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0 20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0 • External staff (inFTEs) 20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0 20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 Admin. Support - at Headquarters 0 0 0 0 line [XX.01.YY.YY] - in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3.2.4.2. Financed from external assigned revenues Year Year Year Year EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES 2024 2025 2026 2027  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff) 20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0 36 Please specify below the table how many FTEs within the number indicated are already assigned to the management of the action and/or can be redeployed within your DG and what are your net needs. EN 22 EN 20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0 • External staff (in full time equivalent units) 20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0 20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 Admin. Support - at Headquarters 0 0 0 0 line [XX.01.YY.YY] - in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 3.2.4.3. Total requirements of human resources TOTAL VOTED APPROPRIATIONS Year Year Year Year + EXTERNAL ASSIGNED REVENUES 2024 2025 2026 2027  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff) 20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) 0 0 0 0 20 01 02 03 (EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 01 (Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 11 (Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) 0 0 0 0 • External staff (in full time equivalent units) 20 02 01 (AC, END from the ‘global envelope’) 0 0 0 0 20 02 03 (AC, AL, END and JPD in the EU Delegations) 0 0 0 0 Admin. Support - at Headquarters 0 0 0 0 line [XX.01.YY.YY] - in EU Delegations 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 02 (AC, END - Indirect research) 0 0 0 0 01 01 01 12 (AC, END - Direct research) 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Heading 7 0 0 0 0 Other budget lines (specify) - Outside Heading 7 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 The staff required to implement the proposal (in FTEs): To be covered by Exceptional additional staff* current staff available in the Commission services EN 23 EN To be financed To be financed To be financed under Heading 7 from BA line from fees or Research Establishment N/A plan posts External staff (CA, SNEs, INT) Description of tasks to be carried out by: Officials and temporary staff N/A External staff N/A 3.2.5. Overview of estimated impact on digital technology-related investments Compulsory: the best estimate of the digital technology-related investments entailed by the proposal/initiative should be included in the table below. Exceptionally, when required for the implementation of the proposal/initiative, the appropriations under Heading 7 should be presented in the designated line. The appropriations under Headings 1-6 should be reflected as “Policy IT expenditure on operational programmes”. This expenditure refers to the operational budget to be used to re-use/ buy/ develop IT platforms/ tools directly linked to the implementation of the initiative and their associated investments (e.g. licences, studies, data storage etc). The information provided in this table should be consistent with details presented under Section 4 “Digital dimensions”. Year Year Year Year TOTAL MFF TOTAL Digital and IT appropriations 2021 - 2024 2025 2026 2027 2027 HEADING 7 IT expenditure (corporate) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Subtotal HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Outside HEADING 7 Policy IT expenditure on operational 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 programmes Subtotal outside HEADING 7 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 TOTAL 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.2.6. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework The proposal/initiative: –  can be fully financed through redeployment within the relevant heading of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) –  requires use of the unallocated margin under the relevant heading of the MFF and/or use of the special instruments as defined in the MFF Regulation EN 24 EN –  requires a revision of the MFF 3.2.7. Third-party contributions The proposal/initiative: –  does not provide for co-financing by third parties –  provides for the co-financing by third parties estimated below: Appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places) Year Year Year Year Total 2024 2025 2026 2027 Specify the co-financing body TOTAL appropriations co- financed 3.3. Estimated impact on revenue –  The proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue. –  The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact: –  on own resources –  on other revenue –  please indicate, if the revenue is assigned to expenditure lines EUR million (to three decimal places) Appropriations Impact of the proposal/initiative37 available for the Budget revenue line: current financial year Year 2024 Year 2025 Year 2026 Year 2027 Article …………. For assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected. N/A Other remarks (e.g. method/formula used for calculating the impact on revenue or any other information). N/A 4. DIGITAL DIMENSIONS 4.1. Requirements of digital relevance Reference to Requirement Actor affected High-level Category (Data the description or concerned processes / Digital requirement solution / 37 As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 20% for collection costs. EN 25 EN (Article/paragr Digital public aph) service / Process digitalisation) Art. 1(3) [Art. Replaces the European Data review and Data 76(4) of prescriptive Commission / publication Regulation (EU) obligation for Member States 2023/1542] the Commission to publish a periodic report on Member States’ data with a more flexible system allowing adaptive data review and optional publication. Digital relevance: modifies existing EU- level data- management and reporting processes. Art. 2 [Art. 6(9) Allows Member Member States; Environmental Data / Digital of Regulation States to gather Livestock and data collection Public Service (EU) 2024/1244 and submit data aquaculture and reporting ] on emissions, operators; waste transfers, European production Commission volumes and operating hours by alternative digital or administrative means, exempting certain operators. Digital relevance: modifies data- collection and EN 26 EN transmission processes within the Industrial Emissions Portal system. 4.2. Data Type of data Reference(s) Standards/specifications (if applicable) Existing Industrial Emissions Art. 2 [Art. 6(9) of Regulation Portal data formats Environmental and industrial (EU) 2024/1244 ] (XML/CSV); aligned with emissions data Aarhus and UNECE PRTR Protocol Alignment with the European Data Strategy Explain how the requirement(s) are aligned with the European Data Strategy The proposal advances the European Data Strategy by ensuring adaptive and proportionate data management, while simplifying redundant reporting. It maintains interoperability and transparency under the Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol. Alignment with the once-only principle Explain how the once-only principle has been considered how the possibility to reuse existing data explored The proposal advances the European Data Strategy by ensuring adaptive and proportionate data management, while simplifying redundant reporting. It maintains interoperability and transparency under the Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol. Explain how newly created data is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable, and meets high-quality standards Modified data remains findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable within current reporting frameworks. Data flows EN 27 EN Type of data Referenc Actor Actor Trigger for Frequency e(s) to who who the data (if the provides receives exchange applicable) requirem the data the data ent(s) Art. 2 [Art. 6(9) of Operators / Environmenta Industrial emissions & Regulation Commissio Annual / as (EU) Member l reporting waste transfer data n / EEA collected 2024/1244 ] States cycle Art. 1(3) [Art. 76(4) of European Battery waste Regulation Member Reporting As Commissio management data (EU) States period determined n 2023/1542] 4.3. Digital solutions Digital Reference(s Main Responsib How is How is Use of AI solution ) to the mandated le body accessibili reusability technologi requiremen functionaliti ty catered considered es ts es for? ? Industria Art. 2 [Art. Data EEA / Public Reuse of None l 6(9) of collection, European access per existing Emissio Regulation validation, Commissi Aarhus portal ns Portal (EU) and on and PRTR infrastructu 2024/1244 ] publication; re alternative reporting methods by MS. — — — For each digital solution, explain how the digital solution complies with the requirements and obligations of the EU cybersecurity framework, and other applicable digital policies and legislative enactments (such as eIDAS, Single Digital Gateway, etc.). EN 28 EN Industrial Emissions Portal Digital and/or sectorial policy Explanation on how it aligns (when these are applicable) AI Act No AI use foreseen. EU Cybersecurity framework Compliant with Reg. (EU) 2019/881; ISO/IEC 27001 standards. eIDAS Access controlled via EU Login for national authorities. Single Digital Gateway and IMI Not applicable. Others - 4.4. Interoperability assessment Digital public Description Reference(s) Interoperable Other service Europe interoperabilit Solution(s) y solution(s) (NOT APPLICABLE ) Industrial Cross-border Art. 2 [Art. 6(9) Aarhus/PRTR Emissions environmental of Regulation protocol Portal data exchange (EU) 2024/1244 standards; between MS ] INSPIRE and EU metadata rules institutions. Assess the impact of the requirement(s) on cross-border interoperability Industrial Emissions Portal Assessment Measures Potential remaining barriers Assess the alignment with existing digital and The proposal does not Timing and frequency of MS-level sectorial policies introduce external alternative data collection may digital/sectorial policy differ. Please list the applicable digital and instruments as binding sectorial policies measures. identified Assess the Conditional operator organisational measures exemptions for items (b), MS capacity and internal EN 29 EN for a smooth cross- (c), (e), (f), (g) when governance structures may vary, border digital public Member States can obtain creating unevenness in how services delivery the data to fulfil Article 7 consistently and promptly MS can Please list the obligations; operators are assume “on behalf of” reporting. governance measures relieved from Article 6(1)– Without uniform guidance in the foreseen (8) duties for those items, proposal on coordination formalising a governance mechanisms, cross-border handover to Member States escalation/issue handling may if they can gather such differ across Member States. information by other means. (Article 2 of the proposal → Article 6(9), third subparagraph (link to Article 7). Assess the measures The proposal ties The proposal does not prescribe taken to ensure a alternative MS reporting to harmonised calculation methodologies shared understanding specific data items or data dictionaries for the MS- of the data collected “other means” data, so there enumerated in Article 6(1) Please list such could be different approaches. thereby preserving the measures shared meaning of which Mapping between operator-level datasets are in scope even semantics and MS-aggregated data when operators are may differ across among MS. exempted. (Article 2 of the proposal → Article 6(9), second and third subparagraphs). Link to MS obligations under Article 7 ensures a common understanding of what must be compiled and delivered. (Article 2 of the proposal → Article 6(9), third subparagraph). Assess the use of In the absence technical No additional technical commonly agreed open prescriptions, MS implementations specifications or standards technical specifications of “other means” may rely on are introduced by this heterogeneous formats/tools. and standards proposal for the Industrial Please list such Emissions Portal. The measures amendment strictly concerns who reports and under what conditions, not EN 30 EN how (format/standard). 4.5. Measures to support digital implementation Description of Reference(s) Commission Actors to be Indicative the measure role involved timeline Review of data Art. 1(3) [Art. Simplification Commission 2026 – 2027 publication 76(4) of of redundant practices under Regulation (EU) reporting. Batteries 2023/1542] Regulation NB: In case the initial Commission proposal evolves considerably during the legislative negotiations, it should be considered to update information laid down in the LFDS for any financial and/or digital aspects, as necessary, with the aim to support the negotiation process and create clarity for all parties concern EN 31 EN 13.01.2026 Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus Otsuse ettepanek koordinatsioonikogule Kujundada seisukoht Kaasvastutaja sisendi tähtpäev 28.01.2026 KOKi esitamise tähtpäev 18.02.2026 VV esitamise tähtpäev 26.02.2026 Vastutav ministeerium: Kliimaministeerium Kaasvastutajad: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium, Rahandusministeerium, Justiits- ja Digiministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium Seisukoha valitsusse toomise alus ja põhjendus Algatuse reguleerimisala nõuab vastavalt Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadusele seaduse või Riigikogu otsuse vastuvõtmist, muutmist või kehtetuks tunnistamist (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 1); Algatuse vastuvõtmisega kaasneks oluline majanduslik või sotsiaalne mõju (RKKTS § 152¹ lg 1 p 2); Seisukoha võtmist peab oluliseks peaminister või minister (VVS § 20¹ lg 2); Sisukokkuvõte Euroopa Komisjon avaldas 10. detsembril 2025 keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise paketi (omnibusi), mis sisaldab ettepanekuid tööstusheite, ringmajanduse, keskkonnamõju hindamise ja georuumiliste andmete valdkonna lihtsustamiseks. Muudatused aitavad vähendada ettevõtjate halduskoormust, säilitades samal ajal ELi ambitsioonikad eesmärgid kaitsta keskkonda ja inimeste tervist. Sellega kiirendatakse ja ühtlustatakse kõigi projektide loamenetlusi, eelkõige strateegilistes sektorites, nagu strateegilised digiprojektid, kriitilise tähtsusega toorainete projektid ja taskukohased eluasemed, hõlbustades üleminekut puhtale ja digitaalsele majandusele ELis. Eeskirjade lihtsustamine ja halduskoormuse vähendamine on ülimalt oluline keskkonnaeesmärkide saavutamise ja ELi konkurentsivõime tugevdamise jaoks. Algatus on osa laiemast tegevusest kooskõlas ELi konkurentsivõime kompassiga. See aitab vähendada bürokraatiat ning toetab ELi konkurentsi- ja vastupanuvõimet, edendades samal ajal kestlikku kasvu. Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus koosneb teatisest ja kuuest seadusandlikust ettepanekust, mis hõlmavad järgmisi sihipäraseid seadusandlikke muudatusi: 1. Teatis (COM (2025) 980) käsitleb Euroopa Komisjoni keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise ja halduskoormuse vähendamise suunda, eesmärgiga tugevdada ELi kestlikku konkurentsivõimet ilma keskkonnaeesmärke nõrgestamata. Teatis annab keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise paketile poliitilise raamistiku, mis keskendub tööstusheidete, ringmajanduse, ruumiandmete ja keskkonnamõjude hindamise lihtsustamisele. Samuti kirjeldab see edasisi samme keskkonnaõiguse stressitestimiseks ja tulevasteks algatusteks, sh ringmajanduse ja kemikaalipoliitika valdkonnas. 2. Määruse ettepanek (COM (2025) 981), millega lihtsustatakse kehtivat patareide ja patarei jäätmete määrust (EL) 2023/1542 seoses tootja mõiste täpsustamise, ohtlike ainete määratluse ja kergtranspordivahendite akude eemaldatavuse nõuete muutmisega, ning tööstusheite portaali määrust (EL) 2024/1244, mille puhul tehakse ettepanek vabastada loomakasvatus- ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad kohustusest esitada aruandeid vee-, energia- ja materjalikasutuse kohta. Samuti luuakse liikmesriikidele võimalus vabastada loomakasvatuse ja vesiviljeluse rajatiste käitajad teatud aruandluskohustustest, kui need andmed on võimalik koguda teistmoodi. 3. Määruse ettepanek (COM (2025) 982), millega peatatakse patareide ja akude ning nende jäätmete ja pakendi- ja pakendijäätmete laiendatud tootjavastutuse jaoks volitatud esindaja määramise kohustus EL ettevõtetele kuni 1. jaanuarini 2035. Säilitatakse kehtivad sätted, mis käsitlevad kolmandates riikides asuvate tootjate laiendatud tootjavastutuse jaoks volitatud esindaja määramist. 4. Direktiivi ettepanek (COM (2025) 983), millega peatatakse jäätmete, elektri- ja elektroonikaseadmete jäätmete ühekordselt kasutatavate plastijäätmete laiendatud tootjavastutuse esindajate määramise kohustus EL ettevõtetele kuni 1. jaanuarini 2035. Kolmandate riikide ettevõtetele nähakse aga jätkuvalt vajadust esindaja määramist kohaldada. 5. Keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse veepoliitika raamdirektiivi, strateegilise keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi, linnudirektiivi, keskkonnamõju hindamise direktiivi ja elupaigadirektiivi lubade koordineeritud ja/või ühiste menetluste rakendamist. Liikmesriikides tuleb luua (ka piiriüleste projektide korral) üks kontaktpunkt, kes läbi menetluse on vastutav hindamise hõlbustamise ja koordineerimise eest. Lisaks käiakse välja tähtajad projektide eelhindamise ja 2 mõjuhindamise ning avaliku kaasamise osas. Nähakse ka ette järk- järguline keskkonnamõjude hindamise digitaliseerimine. 6. Ettepanek INSPIRE ruumiandmete direktiivi 2007/2/EÜ lihtsustamiseks (COM (2025) 985), millega eemaldatakse andmete ja andmete jagamise tehnilised nõuded ning viiakse need kooskõlla uuema horisontaalse ELi andmeõigusega. 7. Direktiivi ettepanek COM (2025) 986), millega vähendatakse halduskoormust ja muudetakse jäätmedirektiivi (2008/98/EÜ), tööstusheite direktiivi (2010/75/EL ja 2024/1785), keskmise võimsusega põletusseadmete direktiivi (EL) 2015/2193. Algatus sisaldab näiteks ettepanekut tühistada jäätmedirektiivi alusel loodud toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete (SCIP) andmebaas. Lisaks soovitakse anda ettevõtetele suurem paindlikkus tööstusheidete direktiivi kohaste keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide (KKJS) rakendamisel. Näiteks kaotatakse nõue lisada ümberkujundamiskavad. Käitajatele antakse rohkem aega KKJS ettevalmistamiseks ja KKJS-i puhul ei ole enam vaja sõltumatuid auditeid. Pakutakse ka leevendused vesinikupõhiste tööstusprotsesside kasutuselevõtu hõlbustamiseks ning täpsustused CO2 püüdmistehnoloogiate kasutuselevõtu võimaldamiseks. Samuti nähakse ette erand keskmise võimsusega põletusseadmetele, mida kasutatakse üksnes aeg-ajalt varugeneraatoritena hädaolukordades ja elektrikatkestuste ajal. Kas EL algatus reguleerib karistusi või haldustrahve? Ei Kas nähakse ette uue asutuse loomine (järelevalvelised või muud asutused)? Jah Ei ole välistatud, sest keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse ette liikmesriikides kontaktpunkti loomist (ka piiriüleste projektide korral), mille eesmärk on koordineerida erinevate EL keskkonnadirektiivide kohaseid keskkonnamõju hindamisi ühtses loamenetluses, et vähendada dubleerimist ja kiirendada menetlusi. Kas lahenduse rakendamine vajab IT-arendusi? Jah Keskkonnale avalduvate mõjude hindamise kiirendamise määruse ettepanekus (COM (2025) 984) nähakse ette keskkonnalubade ja keskkonnamõjude hindamise infosüsteemide arendamist, sh menetluste digitaliseerimist, andmete korduvkasutust ja infosüsteemide koostalitlusvõimet. IT-arenduste eesmärk on sealjuures kiirendada ja ühtlustada loamenetlusi, vähendada dubleerimist ning parandada avalikkuse ja projektide läbipaistvust. Direktiivi ettepanekus (COM (2025) 986), mis on suunatud jäätmete ja tööstusheite valdkonna lihtsustamisele, nähakse ette toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete (SCIP) andmebaasi asendamine uute digitaalsete lahendustega. Uued lahendused nagu digitaalne tootepass ja ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel võivad vajada andmesüsteemide arendamist ning koostalitlusvõime lahendusi. 3 Eesmärgid Eesmärk 1: Keskkonnamõju hindamise ühtlustamine loamenetlustes Projektiarendajate jaoks muutuvad menetlused lihtsamaks ja kiiremaks ning loomisel on ühtsed kontaktpunktid, digiteenused ja kiirmenetluse võimalused. See kiirendab ELi majanduse jaoks vajalikke olulisi projekte. Peale selle sisaldab ettepanek täiendavaid kiirendavaid meetmeid strateegiliste sektorite ja projektide jaoks, mis aitavad kaasa süsinikuheite vähendamisele ja ressursitõhususele ning taskukohaste eluasemete rajamisele. Eesmärk 2: Tööstusheitenormide lihtsustamine ettevõtetele ja põllumajandustootjatele Ettevõtjad saavad suurema paindlikkuse keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide rakendamisel tööstusheidete direktiivi alusel. Näiteks kaotatakse ümberkujundamis- kavade lisamise nõue. Ettevõtjatele antakse rohkem aega keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemide ettevalmistamiseks. Keskkonnajuhtimissüsteemi sõltumatut auditit ei ole enam vaja. Põllumajandustootjad ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad vabastatakse teatavatest aruandluskohustustest, et leevendada nende halduskoormust. Peale selle lihtsustatakse põllumajandustegevuse ulatuse kriteeriume ja vähendatakse dubleerimist mahepõllumajandusettevõtete puhul. Eesmärk 3: Digilahenduste tõhustamine toodetes sisalduvate probleemsete ainete registreerimiseks Toodetes sisalduvate probleemsete ainete andmebaasi (SCIP) kulud on olnud ebaproportsionaalselt suured ning selle funktsioonid asendatakse tõhusamate digilahendustega, nagu digitaalne tootepass ja ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel. Seepärast teeb komisjon ettepaneku muuta jäätmete raamdirektiivi, et tunnistada andmebaas senisel kujul kehtetuks. Eesmärk 4: Laiendatud tootjavastutuse lihtsustamine Praegu nõutakse patareisid, akusid, pakendeid, elektroonikaseadmeid, ühekordselt kasutatavaid plasttooteid ja jäätmeid käsitlevates õigusaktides, et ELis asuvad ettevõtjad määraksid oma laiendatud tootjavastutusega seotud kohustuste täitmiseks volitatud esindaja. Ettevõtjad peavad looma sellise süsteemi igas liikmesriigis, mis ei ole nende asukohariik, kuid kus nad müüvad oma tooteid. See kohustus peatatakse Euroopa tootjate jaoks, kuni ühtlustatakse ringmajanduse õigusakti kohaseid laiendatud tootjavastutuse süsteeme. See vähendab ELis ettevõtlusega tegelemise kulusid. Eesmärk 5: Juurdepääsu lihtsustamine georuumilistele andmetele Praegused INSPIRE direktiivi kohased georuumiliste andmete tehnilised nõuded viiakse täielikult kooskõlla horisontaalsete õigusaktidega, millega reguleeritakse kvaliteetseid avaliku sektori georuumilisi andmeid. Selline lihtsustamine vähendab avaliku sektori 4 asutuste nõuete täitmisega seotud kulusid ja hõlbustab kõigi avaliku ja erasektori kasutajate juurdepääsu väärtuslikele georuumiliste andmete kogumitele. Mõju ja sihtrühm Mõju valdkonnad Sotsiaalala Tööturg ja -keskkond Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted, elanikud Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatus (COM (2025) 986) näeb ette SCIP andmebaasi senisel kujul lõpetamise ja selle funktsioonide asendamise uute tõhusamate digilahendustega (nt digitaalne tootepass, ainete ühekordse hindamise mudel). SCIP andmebaas on olnud abivahend jäätmekäitlejatele ja ringmajandussektori töötajatele, et tuvastada ohtlikke aineid toodete elutsükli lõpus. SCIP andmebaas pakub ka avalikku ja tsentraliseeritud infot toodetes sisalduvate väga ohtlike ainete kohta. Andmebaasi kaotamine võib ajutiselt vähendada tööohutusalase info kättesaadavust, kui alternatiivsed lahendused ei ole veel täielikult rakendunud. Majandus Ettevõtlus Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatuste rakendamine ei too ettevõtetele kaasa olulisi täiendavaid majanduslikke kulusid, vastupidi, enamik ettepanekuid vähendab haldus- ja aruandluskulusid. Võimalikud kulud on üksikud ja üleminekulised, peamiselt seotud uute digilahendustega kohanemisega. Halduskoormus Kas lahendusega kaasneb mõju halduskoormusele? Jah Kas ettevõtetele halduskoormus: Nii kasvab kui kahaneb Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatused vähendavad ettevõtete aruandlus- ja halduskohustusi (nt laiendatud tootjavastutuse volitatud esindaja kohustuse peatamine, tööstusheite ja jäätmealase aruandluse lihtsustamine, SCIP andmebaasi kaotamine, loamenetluste kiirendamine ja ühtlustamine). Võimalikud uute digilahendustega kohanemise kulud on ajutised ega muuda üldist suunda, milleks on halduskoormuse vähenemine. Kas avaliku sektori töökoormus: Nii kasvab kui kahaneb 5 Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatuste rakendamine võib lühiajaliselt suurendada töökoormust (nt menetluste ümberkorraldamine, kontaktpunkti määramine, uute digilahenduste juurutamine). Pikemas perspektiivis vähendab ühtlustatud ja digiteeritud menetlus dubleerimist, parandab andmete korduvkasutust ning lihtsustab haldusprotsesse, mille tulemusel avaliku sektori töökoormus väheneb. Põllu-, metsa- ja kalamajandus ning toiduainetööstus Sihtrühm: Põllumajandus-, kalandus- ja metsandusettevõtted Mõju sihtrühmale: Põllumajandustootjad ja vesiviljelusettevõtjad vabastatakse teatavatest aruandluskohustustest, et leevendada nende halduskoormust. Peale selle lihtsustatakse põllumajandustegevuse ulatuse kriteeriume ja vähendatakse dubleerimist mahepõllumajandusettevõtete puhul. Keskkond Jäätmed ja ringmajandus Sihtrühm: Ettevõtted Mõju sihtrühmale: Algatustel on jäätmete ja ringmajandusega tegelevatele ettevõtetele valdavalt positiivne mõju, kuna vähenevad aruandlus- ja halduskohustused ning kiirenevad loamenetlused: kaotatakse SCIP andmebaasi kasutamise kohustus, ühtlustatakse ja lihtsustatakse laiendatud tootjavastutuse aruandlust, peatatakse ELi ettevõtetele volitatud esindaja määramise kohustus, lihtsustatakse tööstusheidete direktiivi kohaseid nõudeid ning ringmajanduse ja jäätmekäitluse projektide loamenetlused muutuvad kiiremaks ja paremini koordineerituks. Riigivalitsemine Riigieelarve Kas lahendusega kaasneb mõju riigieelarve kuludele? Jah Selgitus: Algatustega võib kaasneda lühiajaline ja piiratud mõju riigieelarve kuludele (peamiselt seoses menetluste ümberkorraldamise ja IT-süsteemide kohandustega), kuid pikemas perspektiivis on mõju neutraalne või kulusid vähendav. Kaasamine Kaasata kõik asjassepuutuvad huvirühmad. 6 . Resolutsiooni liik: Riigikantselei resolutsioon Viide: Kliimaministeerium / / ; Riigikantselei / / 2-5/26-00082 Resolutsiooni teema: Keskkonnaõiguse lihtsustamise omnibus Adressaat: Kliimaministeerium Ülesanne: Tulenevalt Riigikogu kodu- ja töökorra seaduse § 152` lg 1 p 2 ning Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 3 lg 4 palun valmistada ette Vabariigi Valitsuse seisukohtade ja otsuste eelnõud järgmiste algatuste kohta, kaasates seejuures olulisi huvigruppe ja osapooli: - Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden, COM(2025)981 - Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of an authorised representative for extended producer responsibility for batteries and waste batteries and packaging and packaging waste,COM(2025)982 - Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL suspending the application of the rules on the appointment of authorised representatives for extended producer responsibility for waste, waste electrical and electronical equipment and single use plastic waste.COM(2025)983 - Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on speeding-up environmental assessments,COM(2025)984 - Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directive 2007/2/EC as regards simplification of certain requirements for the establishment of the Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the Union,COM(2025)985 - Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden,COM(2025)986 EISi toimiku nr: 26-0012 Tähtaeg: 13.02.2026 Adressaat: Justiits- ja Digiministeerium, Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Rahandusministeerium, Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium Ülesanne: Palun esitada oma sisend Kliimaministeeriumile seisukohtade kujundamiseks antud eelnõu kohta (eelnõude infosüsteemi (EIS) kaudu). Tähtaeg: 28.01.2026 Lisainfo: Eelnõusid on kavas arutada valitsuse 26.02.2026 istungil ja Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 6 lg 6 kohaselt sellele eelneval nädalal (18.02.2026) EL koordinatsioonikogus. Esialgsed materjalid EL koordinatsioonikoguks palume esitada hiljemalt 13.02.2026. Kinnitaja: Merli Vahar, Euroopa Liidu asjade direktori asetäitja Kinnitamise kuupäev: 14.01.2026 Resolutsiooni koostaja: Sandra Metste [email protected], Eelnõude infosüsteemis (EIS) on täitmiseks antud ülesandele lisandunud uusi andmeid või dokumente. Eelnõu toimik: 19.1.1/26-0012 - COM(2025) 981 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden Menetlusetapp algatati 14.01.2026 15:22 Arvamuse andmine eelnõu kohta Kliimaministeeriumile vastavalt Riigikantselei 14.01.2026 resolutsioonile. Osapooled: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium; Justiits- ja Digiministeerium; Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium; Rahandusministeerium; Sotsiaalministeerium Tähtaeg: 28.01.2026 23:59 Link eelnõu toimiku vaatele: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335 Link menetlusetapile: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335?activity=2 Eelnõude infosüsteem (EIS) https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main Eelnõude infosüsteemis (EIS) on antud täitmiseks ülesanne. Eelnõu toimik: 19.1.1/26-0012 - COM(2025) 981 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 and Regulation (EU) 2024/1244 as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden Arvamuse andmine eelnõu kohta Kultuuriministeeriumile vastavalt Riigikantselei 14.01.2026 resolutsioonile. Osapooled: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium; Justiits- ja Digiministeerium; Regionaal- ja Põllumajandusministeerium; Rahandusministeerium; Sotsiaalministeerium Tähtaeg: 28.01.2026 23:59 Link eelnõu toimiku vaatele: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335 Link menetlusetapile: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/14c429f1-7abe-4f9e-bc3a-d2d13febf335?activity=2 Eelnõude infosüsteem (EIS) https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main
Allikas: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium dokumendiregister →
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel