left -144145 Lp v andeadvokaat Mart Parind Meie : 18 . 0 2 .202 6 nr 12.2-10/ 2 7 ARQUUS SAS e sindaja e-post:
[email protected] Lp Evelin Adamson Riigi Kaitseinvesteeringute Keskus e esindaja e- post:
[email protected] Lp Roman Shimonov Roshel Inc. esindaja e-post:
[email protected] [email protected] Kirjaliku menetluse teade Teatame, et Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjon vaatab riigihangete seaduse (edaspidi RHS) § 195 lg 2 ja § 196 lg 1 alusel Riigi Kaitseinvesteeringute Keskus e riigihankes „ 4x4 soomustransportööride ostmine Moldova kaitseväele“ (viitenumber 282071) ARQUUS SAS esitatud vaidlustuse läbi kirjalikus menetluses ( hankija ja kolmanda isiku vastus ed lisatud , vaidlustajale ei edastata hankija ärisaladusega vastuse lisasid ). Vaidlustust vaatab läbi vaidlustuskomisjoni liige Ulvi Reimets . RHS § 196 l g 3 alusel teatab vaidlustuskomisjon, et otsuse avalikult teatavaks tegemise aeg on 16 . 0 3 . 202 6 . Otsus edastatakse menetlusosaliste e-posti aadressidele. Lähtudes RHS § 196 lg-st 3 on menetlusosalistel võimalik esitada vaidlustuskomisjonile täiendavaid selgitusi ja dokumente, sh menetluskulude taotlusi, kuni 23 . 0 2 .202 6 . Selleks tähtajaks laekunud selgitustele on teis t el menetlusosalis t el võimalik vastata ja esitatud dokumentide ning taotluste kohta seisukohti esitada kuni 27 . 0 2 .202 6 . Vaidlustuskomisjon palub menetlusosa l istel mitte korrata juba esitatut. Palume kõik menetlusdokumendid saata samaaegselt ka teis t ele menetlusosalis t ele (e-posti aadressid on käesolevas kirjas olemas) . Vaidlustaja on taotlenud järgmisi dokumente: kirjavahetus h ankija ja kaasatud k olmanda isiku vahel, mida on peetud seoses pakkumuse maksumuse põhjendatuse ja/või k olmanda isiku pakkumuses ristsubsideerimise keelust kinnipidamise kontrollimisega ; h ankija koostatud dokume ndid , milles kajastuvad h ankija kaalutlused ja analüüs k olmanda isiku poolt h ankijale antud selgituste kohta pakkumuse maksumuse kujunemise osas. 09.01.2026 on hankija pöördunud kolmanda isiku poole: “ Dear tenderer In relation to the cost of your tender, the contracting authority would like to clarify the following : 1) Based on the fact that the contracting authority has prohibited cross-subsidization when submitting tenders , both internal ( between individual lines or parts offered in the tender) and external in the procurement base documents , the contracting authority requests that you explain how the cost of your tender has been formed and confirm that no cross-subsidization ( both external and internal ) has been used in determining the cost of your tender. 2) Subsection 1 of § 115 of the Public Procurement Act of the Republic of Estonia states that if the contracting authority or entity finds that the value of a tender is , given the subject matter of the contract , unreasonably low , the authority or entity must, in a form reproducible in writing , require the tenderer to offer relevant clarifications and these must be given in the same form . The tenderer must submit a written explanation to the authority or entity within five working days following receipt of the corresponding requirement . Subsection 7 of § 115 of the Public Procurement Act of the Republic of Estonia states that the low value of a tender may be justified , above all, by the following : 1) the economics of the manufacturing process , of the services provided or of the construction method ; 2) the technical solutions chosen by the tenderer or any exceptionally favourable conditions available to the tenderer for the performance of the public contract ; 3) the originality of the supplies , services or works ; 4) provisions governing the fields of environmental , social and labour law in the place of performance of the public contract , which the tenderer or the subcontractor must adhere to ; 5) the possibility of the tenderer obtaining state aid . Therefore , we kindly ask you to provide explanations and justifications how the cost presented in your tender has determined . For clarity , we would like to note that a general confirmation stating that you guarantee the provision of the goos and services at the proposed cost cannot be considered sufficient by the contracting authority . In relation with the above , we kindly request to provide ECDI with cost estimates of following components : - rolling chassis ( frame , steering system , powertrain and drivetrain ) - armoured hull including turret and standard electrical system - interior parts ( seats , trim parts, standard compartments ) - custom parts for accomodating GFE ( brackets , electrical interfaces , software customization if applicable ) - direct cost for production including facilities and labour - direct cost for engineering effort for accomodating GFE - direct cost for project management - direct cost for quality inspection and testing - indirect operational costs or overhead per vehicle - transportation cost for the vehicles . If you provide the abovementioned cost estimates please keep this structure for submitting the CBS in a such manner that all the above mentioned categories are used . In case you see that there is a high level article or domain missing , feel free to add it to the previous list. Also we are well aware that there are many costs that fall on the border between two or more categories . In such cases you are welcome to choose the category that is more suitable based on your own discretion since we would like to limit the CBS analysis with such high level view . Please submit written explanations and justifications along with relevant supporting evidences to the contracting authority within five working days of receiving this request . Kolmas isik on 16.02.2026 vastanud järgmiselt : P lease find attached Roshel Inc.’s response to your request for clarification under RHS §115, together with the supporting documents. The following documents are attached: 1. Response to Request for Clarification under RHS §115.pdf 2. Response to Challenge_eng.pdf 3. Annex 1. Additional information on price justification (CONFIDENTIAL).pdf 4. CBS. CONFIDENTIAL.xsls Kindly note that both the "CBS. CONFIDENTIAL.xsls " file and "Annex 1. Additional information on price justification (CONFIDENTIAL).pdf" contain strictly CONFIDENTIAL commercial information and are provided solely for the purposes of this procedure. We respectfully request that these documents be handled accordingly. Should you require any further clarification, we remain at your disposal. Ja esitanud lisad 1, 2, 3 ja 4. Hankija edastas vaidlustajale 17.02.2026 hankekomisjoni protokolli (ilma ärisaladuseta) ja lisad 1 ja 2. Lisades 3 ja 4 toodu on kolmas isik määranud oma ärisaladuseks ja vaidlustuskomisjon nõustu b sellega - t egemist on hinnakujundust käsitlevate dokument idega (e baausa konkurentsi takistamise ja ärisaladuse kaitse seaduse § 5 lg 2 ). Vaidlustuskomisjon on sei sukohal, et vaidlustajale on edastatud nõutud dokumendid, va need, mis sisaldavad kolmanda isiku ärisaladust . Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Ulvi Reimets Riigihangete vaidlustuskomisjoni liige L isa: hankija ja kolmanda isiku vastus ed Mari-Ann Sinimaa, 611 3713,
[email protected]