Leping

Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)3567524 - 17/05/2024 Proposal Evaluation Form EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation Summary Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Report - Research and innovation actions Call: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Type of action: HORIZON-RIA Proposal number: 101178897 Proposal acronym: DEXPLORE Duration (months): 36 Proposal title: Recognizing European potential for hosting deep land primary CRM by combining new mineral models and advanced exploration and visualization techniques Activity: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-01 N. Proposer name Country Total % Grant % eligible Requested costs 1 CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ES 522,887.5 11.20% 522,887.5 11.20% ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER 2 FUNDACION ICAMCYL ES 247,500 5.30% 247,500 5.30% 3 EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO EL 466,375 9.99% 466,375 9.99% SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON 4 CIBOS INNOVATION IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUCHIKI EL 83,750 1.79% 83,750 1.79% ETAIREIA 5 UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI IT 377,500 8.08% 377,500 8.08% 6 CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS AMKE EL 401,250 8.59% 401,250 8.59% 7 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL EE 517,203.75 11.08% 517,203.75 11.08% 8 MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE EL 260,625 5.58% 260,625 5.58% 9 Terradat Geophysics S.L. ES 406,600 8.71% 406,600 8.71% 10 XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL ES 760,762.5 16.29% 760,762.5 16.29% 11 EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS EE 411,875 8.82% 411,875 8.82% 12 ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL ES 100,750 2.16% 100,750 2.16% 13 Minerales y productos derivados S.A. ES 112,350 2.41% 112,350 2.41% Total: 4,669,428.75 4,669,428.75 Abstract: DEXPLORE seeks to revolutionize mineral exploration in Europe by developing innovative approaches to counter declining ore deposit discovery rates, focusing on deep-seated deposits critical for the economy's decarbonization. The project emphasizes engaging the general public and stakeholders, combining innovation at various levels, and utilizing cutting-edge tools and technologies. Targeting essential materials across extensive geological terrains, DEXPLORE proposes a holistic innovation package, integrating UAV-assisted in-field mineral detection, advanced Earth Observation methods, and novel deep-land geophysics techniques to reach at least 600 m depth. The initiative outlines the development of updated ore models, improving exploration technologies, and providing a visualization platform. This platform will integrate geological, remote sensing, and geophysical data to enhance access to information about EU potential in critical raw materials, while increasing public awareness. DEXPLORE also aims to strengthen cooperation with strategic partner countries, establishing a robust Advisory Board and fostering collaboration with other EU initiatives for joint activities and result sharing. In summary, DEXPLORE represents a collaborative effort to advance mineral exploration, contribute to sustainable sourcing of critical raw materials, and ensure EU's open strategic autonomy. 101178897/DEXPLORE-17/05/2024-09:09:22 1/4  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)3567524 - 17/05/2024 Evaluation Summary Report Evaluation Result Total score: 14.00 (Threshold: 10 ) Criterion 1 - Excellence Score: 4.00 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - ) The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the description in the work programme: - Clarity and pertinence of the project’s objectives, and the extent to which the proposed work is ambitious and goes beyond the state of the art. - Soundness of the proposed methodology, including the underlying concepts, models, assumptions, inter-disciplinary approaches, appropriate consideration of the gender dimension in research and innovation content, and the quality of open science practices, including sharing and management of research outputs and engagement of citizens, civil society and end users where appropriate. DEXPLORE clearly describes the objectives, and the application of several techniques and technologies to find out deep-seated deposits that contain CRMs and SRMs (critical and strategic raw materials): F, Cu, Ni, Mn, natural graphite, Zn, Pb, Mo). It responds to the general objectives of the call. The techniques to be developed deal with ore models using a combination of geophysical techniques, development and demonstration of a field mineral detector combining advanced optical techniques (Raman, LIBS and fluorescence measurements) for geochemical air borne and drone survey, an image-based LA-ICP-MS technique applied to sulfides and garnets for quantification of resources, a system for simultaneous capture of high-quality images of drill cores, an analyses of the chemical composition and magnetic susceptibility of rocks, databases integration, and 3D geological models (GIS) combined with extended reality (XR) visualization. This will be applied to well extended geological domains like crystalline and metamorphic rocks with metallic and non-metallic mineralization in deep land deposits in the EU. They will develop technologies to quantify and qualify minerals over a range of scales from hundreds square metres to several square kilometres in Estonia. The proposed work is ambitious in the sense that it targets many objectives and innovations. The state of the art is overall well described using the literature sources and examples. Going beyond the state of the art is announced with respect to different technologies like for remote mineral detection (Raman+LIBs+fluorescence spectroscopy) with dimension and weight compatible with UAV integration, and the use of artificial intelligence in mineral recognition processes and in developing applications to support augmented reality XR. Both applications are promising technologically. However, some technologies described need more details and scientific references: ore models for deep crystalline and metamorphic polymetallic formations, surface exploration using remote sensing by imaging techniques like hyperspectral and Raman Libs, and passive seismic method. This is minor shortcoming. The project meets the requirements for expanding CRMs resources in EU and other non-EU countries, by developing and updating ore models for CRMs, improving exploration for reaching at least 600 m depth. The proposal announces specific objectives containing 59 KPIs which are too many for a 3 years project; the assessment of these KPIs is not convincingly described. This is a minor shortcoming. The TRL goals are clearly discussed; but a tool with optical and Raman spectroscopy complemented by a new optical system (based on a telescope) must be designed and its level will reach TRL5, which is subject to what appears to be considerable uncertainty that might be considered as a risk. The proposed actions promote the utilization of UNFC. The Sentinel-2 (Copernicus) data will be used, as well as hyperspectral data from EnMAP and PRISMA, additionally. Open science practices include educating the general public about the CRMs and SRMs. However, the open access practices are described generically, without specific information about repositories and strategies to publish the data in open access, which is a shortcoming. The way of sharing result with the general public and specific stakeholders is appropriately described. The Methodology is presented according to the different objectives where technical considerations are described in details. However, one model concerning geophysical techniques for deep land exploration was not presented in sufficient details. This is a shortcoming. DEXPLORE will apply AI algorithms for mineral identification and classification, quantification and estimation, spectral analysis enhancement, data fusion and integration and real-time decision support. Most partners consider gender equality in research and innovation. Criterion 2 - Impact Score: 5.00 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - ) 101178897/DEXPLORE-17/05/2024-09:09:22 2/4  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)3567524 - 17/05/2024 The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the description in the work programme: - Credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme, and the likely scale and significance of the contributions from the project. - Suitability and quality of the measures to maximise expected outcomes and impacts, as set out in the dissemination and exploitation plan, including communication activities. The credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts is convincingly good. The proposal's goals along with the expected measures to achieve them are outlined and clearly discussed. The proposal clearly describes to what extent the outcomes will contribute to increasing access to critical raw materials, and the achievement of the outcomes is quantified with KPIs. To ensure the impact, DEXPLORE will develop a plan for the dissemination, communication, and exploitation of the results. Target groups include mineral exploration providers & suppliers, mining sector, technological applications companies, geophysics industry, geological surveys, and other public & private investors. DEXPLORE will also involve academics and researchers, NGOs, and local communities. Meetings and online workshops will involve different stakeholders. The communication strategy has indicators of success, such as the number of international conferences, increased public acceptance of mining exploration. The target groups of communication activities are well defined. The methods to achieve the environmental impacts are well described and identified, they are credible and in line with objectives. The issue of IPR is addressed, patents and non-disclosure copyrights will be performed. They are good indications of the high TRL level they tend to achieve. Criterion 3 - Quality and efficiency of the implementation Score: 5.00 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: - ) The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the description in the work programme: - Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, assessment of risks, and appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages, and the resources overall. - Capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise. A work plan is provided and is broken down in 8 Work Packages (WPs) comprising 6 scientific/technical and 2 additional for management and dissemination /communication. The interrelationships of each WP and between tasks are clearly discussed. The tasks in particular WPs are directly linked with the objectives of the project. A Gantt chart gives clearly the tasks in each WP and their planning along the timeline. The milestones (14) are well involved into the whole structure of the WPs. Overall, the resources' allocation is well planned according to the tasks. The distribution of human resources is balanced, the efforts assigned to work packages are appropriate, expertise skills are complementary to each other. There is one proposed subcontracting doing LA-ICP-MS measurements, where the planned service cost is reliable. However, UNICA and GSE, which perform specific tasks in WP5 (Task 5.1) have no resources allocated to in this WP. These oversights are not explained in the proposal. This is a minor shortcoming. Critical risks and mitigation measures are well described and defined. Envisaged clustering activities are described but not detailed enough, which is a minor shortcoming. The capacity and role of each participant partners, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise is convincingly good and has an added value as compared to singular entities. Universities, innovation center, business enterprise, leading deep geophysical and global airborne mapping companies, industrial partners and SME organizations are the proposed beneficiaries of the proposal. SME partners are CIBOS, the affiliated entity of the Institute of Communication and Computer Systems (ICCS), which is using remote sensing data (Copernicus) deploying EO solutions, and MNTL, responsible of LCA, LCC and communication tasks in the consortium. Scope of the application Status: Yes Comments (in case the proposal is out of scope) Not provided Exceptional funding A third country participant/international organisation not listed in the General Annex to the Main Work Programme may exceptionally receive funding if their participation is essential for carrying out the project (for instance due to outstanding expertise, access to unique know-how, access to research infrastructure, access to particular geographical environments, possibility to involve key partners in emerging markets, access to data, etc.). (For more information, see the HE programme guide ) Please list the concerned applicants and requested grant amount and explain the reasons why. Based on the information provided, the following participants should receive exceptional funding: Not provided Based on the information provided, the following participants should NOT receive exceptional funding: Not provided Use of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) 101178897/DEXPLORE-17/05/2024-09:09:22 3/4  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)3567524 - 17/05/2024 Status: No If YES, please state whether the use of hESC is, or is not, in your opinion, necessary to achieve the scientific objectives of the proposal and the reasons why. Alternatively, please state if it cannot be assessed whether the use of hESC is necessary or not, because of a lack of information. Not provided Use of human embryos Status: No If YES, please explain how the human embryos will be used in the project. Not provided Activities excluded from funding Status: No If YES, please explain. Not provided Do no significant harm principle Status: Yes If Partially/No/Cannot be assessed please explain Not provided Exclusive focus on civil applications Status: Yes If NO, please explain. Not provided Artificial Intelligence Status: Yes If YES, the technical robustness of the proposed system must be evaluated under the appropriate criterion. Overall comments Not provided 101178897/DEXPLORE-17/05/2024-09:09:22 4/4  Digitally sealed by the European Commission Date: 2024.05.17 09:45:43 CEST This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally sealed. This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity. Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt. Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation symbol. More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders Portal. (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq) Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 DECLARATION OF HONOUR FOR BENEFICIARIES (DoH) I, the undersigned: for natural persons: in my own name or for legal persons1: representing the following entity: EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS KREUTZWALDI TN 5 RAKVERE 44314 Estonia VAT number EE102038860 hereby confirm that (subject to the additional declarations below): 1 — The information provided for action 101178897 — DEXPLORE is correct and complete. 2 — The information concerning the legal status in the Participant Register for me/my organisation is correct and complete. 3 — I/my organisation commit to comply2 with the eligibility criteria and all other conditions set out in the call conditions — for the entire duration of the action. 4 — I/my organisation: – are committed to participate in the action – have stable and sufficient sources of funding to maintain the activities throughout the checking action and to provide any counterpart funding necessary – have or will have the necessary resources needed to implement the action – acknowledge to be fully responsible for my affiliated entities which participate in the action – for research actions: are committed to comply with the highest standards of ethical principles and research integrity and confirm that the work is free of plagiarism – for actions involving EU classified information (EUCI): acknowledge that any sensitive 1 This includes ‘entities without legal personality’ under Article 197(2) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (‘EU Financial Regulation’) (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1). 2 ‘Commit to comply’ means complying now and for the duration of the grant. 1  information or material that qualifies as EU classified information under Commission Decision 2015/4443 must be handled in accordance with specific rules and follow the instructions given by the EU – for coordinators of multi-beneficiary actions: are committed to act as the coordinator for this action. 5 — For applicants from non-EU countries: I/my organisation – undertake to comply with the obligations under the agreement and to: – respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data) – for the submission of financial certificates under the agreement: use qualified external auditors which are independent and comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC – for controls under the agreement: allow for checks, reviews, audits and investigations (including on-the-spot checks, visits and inspections) by the granting authority, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), the European Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and any persons mandated by them – and confirm that: – we can be subject to the jurisdiction of the Belgian courts. 6 — I/my organisation: – are NOT subject to an administrative sanction (i.e. exclusion or financial penalty decision)4 I/my organisation (or persons with unlimited liability for debts): – are NOT in one of the following exclusion situations5: – bankrupt, being wound up, having the affairs administered by the courts, entered into an arrangement with creditors, suspended business activities or subject to any other similar proceedings or procedures – in breach of social security or tax obligations I/my organisation (or persons having powers of representation, decision-making or control, beneficial owners or persons who are essential for the award/implementation of the action): 3 See Commission Decision 2015/544/EU, Euratom of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 53). 4 See Article 136 EU Financial Regulation. 5 See Articles 136 and 141 EU Financial Regulation. 2  – are NOT in one of the following exclusion situations6: – guilty of grave professional misconduct7 – committed fraud, corruption, links to a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorism-related crimes (including terrorism financing), child labour or human trafficking – shown significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations under an EU procurement contract, grant agreement, prize, expert contract, or similar – guilty of irregularities within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Regulation No 2988/95 – created under a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or other legal obligations in the country of origin (including creation of another entity with this purpose). 7 — I/my organisation are NOT subject to a conflict of interest in connection with this grant and will notify — without delay — any situation which could give rise to a conflict of interests. 8 — I/my organisation have NOT and will NOT, neither directly nor indirectly, grant, seek, obtain or accept any advantage in connection with this grant that would constitute an illegal practice or involve corruption. 9 — I/my organisation have not received any other EU grant for this action and will give notice of any future EU grants related to this action AND of any EU operating grant(s)8 given to my organisation. 10 — I/my organisation are aware that false declarations may lead to rejection, suspension, termination or reduction of the grant and to administrative sanctions (i.e. financial penalties and/or exclusion from all future EU procurement contracts, grants, prizes and expert contracts). and acknowledge that: 1 — The grant will be signed and managed electronically, through the Funding & Tenders Portal Electronic Exchange System (accessible via your Funding & Tenders Portal account9). 6 See Articles 136 and 141 EU Financial Regulation. 7 Professional misconduct includes: violation of ethical standards of the profession, wrongful conduct with impact on professional credibility, false declarations/misrepresentation of information, participation in a cartel or other agreement distorting competition, violation of IPR, attempting to influence decision-making processes or obtain confidential information from public authorities to gain an advantage. 8 See Article 180 EU Financial Regulation. 9 Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/myarea/projects. 3 2 — Access and use of the electronic exchange system is subject to the Funding & Tenders Portal Terms & Conditions10. 3 — Personal data submitted or otherwise collected by the EU will be subject to the Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement11. 4 — Payments under the grant are done at consortium-level, through the coordinator, and that payments will be automatically lowered if one of the consortium members has outstanding debts towards the EU (granting authority or other EU bodies). Such debts will be offset in accordance with the conditions set out in the grant agreement. SIGNATURE For the applicant: [--TGSMark#signature-907275533_75_210--] Sirli Sipp Kulli with ECAS id n007yysf signed in the Participant Portal on 28/05/2024 at 17:33:06 (transaction id SigId-67809-scRpQmHtBe Yi7R4vozzbmdv8yrPNRiyJvrGuGSEzk0zUP7HCeXnLoE0sMUKVVUgsg egjLtyzSczGHGP6zIXdUrei-yntOf97TTHqoPPtGMdHyoy-lWhhnBNMj VgqaxBeTlpLdqcXvxKggV4y8nVzPlqMkRIGiDkzzLiwY1vOpOQLiAFMs XUuudWyWVOuEIlfHAlShBG). Timestamp by third party at 2024.05.28 17:33:17 CEST 10 Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/ftp/tc_en.pdf. 11 Available at https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/legalnotice. 4  Digitally sealed by the European Commission Date: 2024.05.22 09:36:00 CEST This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally sealed. This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity. Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt. Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation symbol. More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders Portal. (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq) Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 EUROPEAN HEALTH AND DIGITAL EXECUTIVE AGENCY (HADEA) HADEA.B – Digital, Industry and Space B.3 – Industry GRANT AGREEMENT Project 101178897 — DEXPLORE PREAMBLE This Agreement (‘the Agreement’) is between the following parties: on the one part, the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and on the other part, 1. ‘the coordinator’: CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC), PIC 902077691, established in C/JULIA MORROS S/N OFICINA 107 PARQUE TECNOLOGICO ARMUNIA, LEON 24009, Spain, and the following other beneficiaries, if they sign their ‘accession form’ (see Annex 3 and Article 40): 2. EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON (ICCS), PIC 999654356, established in PATISION 42, ATHINA 106 82, Greece, 3. UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI (UNICA), PIC 999841663, established in VIA UNIVERSITA 40, CAGLIARI 09124, Italy, 4. CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS AMKE (CORE IC), PIC 891712756, established in DELAGRAMMATIKA 5, HALKIDA 341 00, Greece, 5. TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL (TalTech), PIC 999842536, established in EHITAJATE TEE 5, TALLINN 19086, Estonia, 6. MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE (MNLT), PIC 902617787, established in KIFISSIAS 125-127, ATHENS 11524, Greece, 7. TERRADAT GEOPHYSICS SL (Terradat), PIC 879574855, established in AV. CRISTO DE LAS CADENAS, 113, 1A, OVIEDO 33006, Spain, 1 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 8. XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL (XCALIBUR), PIC 885111518, established in AVDA PARTENON 10, MADRID 28042, Spain, 9. EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS (EGT), PIC 907275533, established in KREUTZWALDI TN 5, RAKVERE 44314, Estonia, 10. ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL (ATALAYA MINING), PIC 915360192, established in CALLE LA DEHESA S/N, MINAS DE RIOTINTO 21660, Spain, 11. MINERALES Y PRODUCTOS DERIVADOS SA (MINER SA), PIC 913325326, established in AVENIDA ALGORTA 16, GETXO 48992, Spain, Unless otherwise specified, references to ‘beneficiary’ or ‘beneficiaries’ include the coordinator and affiliated entities (if any). If only one beneficiary signs the grant agreement (‘mono-beneficiary grant’), all provisions referring to the ‘coordinator’ or the ‘beneficiaries’ will be considered — mutatis mutandis — as referring to the beneficiary. The parties referred to above have agreed to enter into the Agreement. By signing the Agreement and the accession forms, the beneficiaries accept the grant and agree to implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. The Agreement is composed of: Preamble Terms and Conditions (including Data Sheet) Annex 1 Description of the action1 Annex 2 Estimated budget for the action Annex 2a Additional information on unit costs and contributions (if applicable) Annex 3 Accession forms (if applicable)2 Annex 3a Declaration on joint and several liability of affiliated entities (if applicable)3 Annex 4 Model for the financial statements Annex 5 Specific rules (if applicable) 1 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 2 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 3 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 2 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GRANT AGREEMENT.................................................................................................................................................... 1 PREAMBLE........................................................................................................................................................................1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................................3 DATASHEET...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL..............................................................................................................................................13 ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT ..................................................................................... 13 ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................13 CHAPTER 2 ACTION................................................................................................................................................. 14 ARTICLE 3 — ACTION................................................................................................................................. 14 ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE...................................................................................14 CHAPTER 3 GRANT...................................................................................................................................................14 ARTICLE 5 — GRANT...................................................................................................................................14 5.1 Form of grant......................................................................................................................................14 5.2 Maximum grant amount..................................................................................................................... 15 5.3 Funding rate........................................................................................................................................15 5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding.............................................................. 15 5.5 Budget flexibility................................................................................................................................15 ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS......................................16 6.1 General eligibility conditions............................................................................................................. 16 6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category................................................................... 17 6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions...................................................................................................... 21 6.4 Consequences of non-compliance...................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................ 23 SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS........................................................................................................................................ 23 ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES................................................................................................................... 23 ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES....................................................................................................... 25 ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION................................................... 25 9.1 Associated partners.............................................................................................................................25 9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action.................................................................... 26 9.3 Subcontractors.....................................................................................................................................26 3 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties..................................................................................26 ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS....................................................................... 26 10.1 Non-EU participants......................................................................................................................... 26 10.2 Participants which are international organisations...........................................................................27 10.3 Pillar-assessed participants............................................................................................................... 27 SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION...........................................................................30 ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION............................................................ 30 11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action................................................................................... 30 11.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 30 ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.............................................................................................. 30 12.1 Conflict of interests.......................................................................................................................... 30 12.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 30 ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY............................................................................ 30 13.1 Sensitive information........................................................................................................................30 13.2 Classified information...................................................................................................................... 31 13.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 31 ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES...................................................................................................... 32 14.1 Ethics.................................................................................................................................................32 14.2 Values................................................................................................................................................ 32 14.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 32 ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION.......................................................................................................... 32 15.1 Data processing by the granting authority....................................................................................... 32 15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries............................................................................................... 32 15.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 33 ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS — ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE................................................................................ 33 16.1 Background and access rights to background..................................................................................33 16.2 Ownership of results.........................................................................................................................33 16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes...................................34 16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background................................................................................ 35 16.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 35 ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY............................................ 35 17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action........................................................... 35 17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement......................................................................... 35 17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer..............................................................................................36 4 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules............................................................36 17.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 36 ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION............................................... 36 18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action........................................................................................ 36 18.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 36 SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................... 37 ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS.................................................................... 37 19.1 Information requests......................................................................................................................... 37 19.2 Participant Register data updates..................................................................................................... 37 19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action............................................37 19.4 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 37 ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING............................................................................................................ 38 20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents.................................................................................... 38 20.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 39 ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING........................................................................................................................ 39 21.1 Continuous reporting........................................................................................................................ 39 21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements....................................................... 39 21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros..........................................................40 21.4 Reporting language...........................................................................................................................40 21.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 40 ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE................. 41 22.1 Payments and payment arrangements.............................................................................................. 41 22.2 Recoveries.........................................................................................................................................41 22.3 Amounts due.....................................................................................................................................41 22.4 Enforced recovery.............................................................................................................................47 22.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 48 ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES....................................................................................................................48 ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES................................................................................................................... 49 24.1 Operational verification report (OVR).............................................................................................49 24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS).................................................................................. 49 24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC).................................. 49 24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA).....................................................................................................49 24.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 50 ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS..................................................................................................................................... 50 5 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits................................................................................ 50 25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities..............52 25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding.......................................................... 52 25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations........................................................................... 52 25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations.................................................................................................................... 52 25.6 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 54 ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS................................................................................................... 54 26.1 Impact evaluation............................................................................................................................. 54 26.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 54 CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE.................................................................................. 54 SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION.................................................................................54 ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS...........................................................54 27.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 54 27.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 55 27.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 55 ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION........................................................................................................ 55 28.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 55 28.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 55 28.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 56 SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION............................................................................................56 ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION............................................................................. 56 29.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 56 29.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 56 ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION...................................................................................................56 30.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 56 30.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 57 ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION..............................................................................57 31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension............................................................................................. 57 31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension.............................................................................................................58 ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION......................................... 59 32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination............................................................................................ 59 32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination................................................................................ 60 32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination.................................................................................... 61 SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS............... 65 6 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES...........................................................................................................................65 33.1 Liability of the granting authority....................................................................................................65 33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries............................................................................................................ 65 ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES....................................... 65 SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE.......................................................................................................................... 65 ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE.............................................................................................................. 65 CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS...........................................................................................................................66 ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES...............................................................66 36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management................................................... 66 36.2 Date of communication.................................................................................................................... 66 36.3 Addresses for communication.......................................................................................................... 66 ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT.....................................................................67 ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES..........................................................67 ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS.................................................................................................................. 67 39.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 67 39.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 67 ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES........................................... 68 40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble............................................................. 68 40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries.......................................................................................................... 68 ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT................................................................................. 68 ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY.................................................................................................................................69 ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES.............................................. 69 43.1 Applicable law..................................................................................................................................69 43.2 Dispute settlement............................................................................................................................ 69 ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE.........................................................................................................70 7 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 DATA SHEET 1. General data Project summary: Project summary DEXPLORE seeks to revolutionize mineral exploration in Europe by developing innovative approaches to counter declining ore deposit discovery rates, focusing on deep-seated deposits critical for the economy's decarbonization. The project emphasizes engaging the general public and stakeholders, combining innovation at various levels, and utilizing cutting-edge tools and technologies. Targeting essential materials across extensive geological terrains, DEXPLORE proposes a holistic innovation package, integrating UAV-assisted in-field mineral detection, advanced Earth Observation methods, and novel deep-land geophysics techniques to reach at least 600 m depth. The initiative outlines the development of updated ore models, improving exploration technologies, and providing a visualization platform. This platform will integrate geological, remote sensing, and geophysical data to enhance access to information about EU potential in critical raw materials, while increasing public awareness. DEXPLORE also aims to strengthen cooperation with strategic partner countries, establishing a robust Advisory Board and fostering collaboration with other EU initiatives for joint activities and result sharing. In summary, DEXPLORE represents a collaborative effort to advance mineral exploration, contribute to sustainable sourcing of critical raw materials, and ensure EU's open strategic autonomy. Keywords: – Mining and mineral processing – CRM, SRM, deep-land exploration, remote sensing, gravimetry, passive seismic, data visualization, deep-seated deposits, holistic innovation package, integrating UAV-assisted in-field mineral detection Project number: 101178897 Project name: Recognizing European potential for hosting deep land primary CRM by combining new mineral models and advanced exploration and visualization techniques Project acronym: DEXPLORE Call: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Topic: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-01 Type of action: HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions Granting authority: European Health and Digital Executive Agency Grant managed through EU Funding & Tenders Portal: Yes (eGrants) Project starting date: fixed date: 1 October 2024 Project end date: 30 September 2027 Project duration: 36 months Consortium agreement: Yes 2. Participants List of participants: Total Max grant N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC eligible costs amount (BEN and AE) 1 COO ISMC CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y ES 902077691 522 887.50 522 887.50 SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER 1.1 AE ICAMCYL FUNDACION ICAMCYL ES 911063674 247 500.00 247 500.00 8 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Total Max grant N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC eligible costs amount (BEN and AE) 2 BEN ICCS EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO EL 999654356 466 375.00 466 375.00 SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON 2.1 AE CogniSensus CogniSensus IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUCHIKI ETAIREIA EL 877176918 83 750.00 83 750.00 3 BEN UNICA UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI IT 999841663 377 500.00 377 500.00 4 BEN CORE IC CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS AMKE EL 891712756 401 250.00 401 250.00 5 BEN TalTech TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL EE 999842536 517 203.75 517 203.75 6 BEN MNLT MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE EL 902617787 260 625.00 260 625.00 7 BEN Terradat TERRADAT GEOPHYSICS SL ES 879574855 406 600.00 406 600.00 8 BEN XCALIBUR XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL ES 885111518 760 762.50 760 762.50 9 BEN EGT EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS EE 907275533 411 875.00 411 875.00 10 BEN ATALAYA ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL ES 915360192 100 750.00 100 750.00 MINING 11 BEN MINER SA MINERALES Y PRODUCTOS DERIVADOS SA ES 913325326 112 350.00 112 350.00 Total 4 669 428.75 4 669 428.75 Coordinator: – CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) 3. Grant Maximum grant amount, total estimated eligible costs and contributions and funding rate: Total eligible costs Funding rate Maximum grant amount Maximum grant amount (BEN and AE) (%) (Annex 2) (award decision) 4 669 428.75 100 4 669 428.75 4 669 428.75 Grant form: Budget-based Grant mode: Action grant Budget categories/activity types: - A. Personnel costs - A.1 Employees, A.2 Natural persons under direct contract, A.3 Seconded persons - A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries - A.6 Personnel unit cost - B. Subcontracting costs - C. Purchase costs - C.1 Travel and subsistence - C.2 Equipment - C.3 Other goods, works and services - D. Other cost categories - D.2 Internally invoiced goods and services - E. Indirect costs Cost eligibility options: 9 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - In-kind contributions eligible costs - Parental leave - Project-based supplementary payments - Average personnel costs (unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices) - Limitation for subcontracting - Travel and subsistence: - Travel: Actual costs - Accommodation: Actual costs - Subsistence: Actual costs - Equipment: depreciation only - Indirect cost flat-rate: 25% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs, subcontracting costs, financial support to third parties and exempted specific cost categories, if any) - VAT: Yes - Other ineligible costs Budget flexibility: Yes (no flexibility cap) 4. Reporting, payments and recoveries 4.1 Continuous reporting (art 21) Deliverables: see Funding & Tenders Portal Continuous Reporting tool 4.2 Periodic reporting and payments Reporting and payment schedule (art 21, 22): Reporting Payments Deadline Reporting periods Type Deadline Type (time to pay) RP No Month from Month to 30 days from entry into force/10 days Initial prefinancing before starting date – whichever is the latest 1 1 18 Periodic report 60 days after end Interim payment 90 days from of reporting period receiving periodic report 2 19 36 Periodic report 60 days after end Final payment 90 days from of reporting period receiving periodic report Prefinancing payments and guarantees: Prefinancing payment Type Amount Prefinancing 1 (initial) 3 735 543.00 10 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Reporting and payment modalities (art 21, 22): Mutual Insurance Mechanism (MIM): Yes MIM contribution: 5% of the maximum grant amount (233 471.44), retained from the initial prefinancing Restrictions on distribution of initial prefinancing: The prefinancing may be distributed only if the minimum number of beneficiaries set out in the call condititions (if any) have acceded to the Agreement and only to beneficiaries that have acceded. Interim payment ceiling (if any): 90% of the maximum grant amount Exception for revenues: Yes No-profit rule: Yes Late payment interest: ECB + 3.5% Bank account for payments: ES0820800910723040101522 CAGLESMM Conversion into euros: Double conversion Reporting language: Language of the Agreement 4.3 Certificates (art 24): Certificates on the financial statements (CFS): Conditions: Schedule: only at final payment, if threshold is reached Standard threshold (beneficiary-level): - financial statement: requested EU contribution to costs ≥ EUR 430 000.00 Special threshold for beneficiaries with a systems and process audit(see Article 24): financial statement: requested EU contribution to costs ≥ EUR 725 000.00 4.4 Recoveries (art 22) First-line liability for recoveries: Beneficiary termination: Beneficiary concerned Final payment: Each beneficiary for their own debt After final payment: Beneficiary concerned Joint and several liability for enforced recoveries (in case of non-payment): Individual financial responsibility: Each beneficiary is liable only for its own debts (and those of its affiliated entities, if any) Joint and several liability of affiliated entities — n/a 5. Consequences of non-compliance, applicable law & dispute settlement forum 11 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Suspension and termination: Additional suspension grounds (art 31) Additional termination grounds (art 32) Applicable law (art 43): Standard applicable law regime: EU law + law of Belgium Dispute settlement forum (art 43): Standard dispute settlement forum: EU beneficiaries: EU General Court + EU Court of Justice (on appeal) Non-EU beneficiaries: Courts of Brussels, Belgium (unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements) 6. Other Specific rules (Annex 5): Yes Standard time-limits after project end: Confidentiality (for X years after final payment): 5 Record-keeping (for X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) Reviews (up to X years after final payment): 2 Audits (up to X years after final payment): 2 Extension of findings from other grants to this grant (no later than X years after final payment): 2 Impact evaluation (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) 12 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT This Agreement sets out the rights and obligations and terms and conditions applicable to the grant awarded for the implementation of the action set out in Chapter 2. ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions apply: Actions — The project which is being funded in the context of this Agreement. Grant — The grant awarded in the context of this Agreement. EU grants — Grants awarded by EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies (including EU executive agencies, EU regulatory agencies, EDA, joint undertakings, etc.). Participants — Entities participating in the action as beneficiaries, affiliated entities, associated partners, third parties giving in-kind contributions, subcontractors or recipients of financial support to third parties. Beneficiaries (BEN) — The signatories of this Agreement (either directly or through an accession form). Affiliated entities (AE) — Entities affiliated to a beneficiary within the meaning of Article 187 of EU Financial Regulation 2018/10464 which participate in the action with similar rights and obligations as the beneficiaries (obligation to implement action tasks and right to charge costs and claim contributions). Associated partners (AP) — Entities which participate in the action, but without the right to charge costs or claim contributions. Purchases — Contracts for goods, works or services needed to carry out the action (e.g. equipment, consumables and supplies) but which are not part of the action tasks (see Annex 1). Subcontracting — Contracts for goods, works or services that are part of the action tasks (see Annex 1). In-kind contributions — In-kind contributions within the meaning of Article 2(36) of EU Financial 4 For the definition, see Article 187 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (‘EU Financial Regulation’) (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1): “affiliated entities [are]: (a) entities that form a sole beneficiary [(i.e. where an entity is formed of several entities that satisfy the criteria for being awarded a grant, including where the entity is specifically established for the purpose of implementing an action to be financed by a grant)]; (b) entities that satisfy the eligibility criteria and that do not fall within one of the situations referred to in Article 136(1) and 141(1) and that have a link with the beneficiary, in particular a legal or capital link, which is neither limited to the action nor established for the sole purpose of its implementation”. 13 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Regulation 2018/1046, i.e. non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties. Fraud — Fraud within the meaning of Article 3 of EU Directive 2017/13715 and Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, drawn up by the Council Act of 26 July 19956, as well as any other wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Irregularities — Any type of breach (regulatory or contractual) which could impact the EU financial interests, including irregularities within the meaning of Article 1(2) of EU Regulation 2988/957. Grave professional misconduct — Any type of unacceptable or improper behaviour in exercising one’s profession, especially by employees, including grave professional misconduct within the meaning of Article 136(1)(c) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. Applicable EU, international and national law — Any legal acts or other (binding or non-binding) rules and guidance in the area concerned. Portal — EU Funding & Tenders Portal; electronic portal and exchange system managed by the European Commission and used by itself and other EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies for the management of their funding programmes (grants, procurements, prizes, etc.). CHAPTER 2 ACTION ARTICLE 3 — ACTION The grant is awarded for the action 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘action’), as described in Annex 1. ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE The duration and the starting date of the action are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 1). CHAPTER 3 GRANT ARTICLE 5 — GRANT 5.1 Form of grant The grant is an action grant8 which takes the form of a budget-based mixed actual cost grant (i.e. a 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29). 6 OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48. 7 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 8 For the definition, see Article 180(2)(a) EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: ‘action grant’ means an EU grant to finance “an action intended to help achieve a Union policy objective”. 14 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 grant based on actual costs incurred, but which may also include other forms of funding, such as unit costs or contributions, flat-rate costs or contributions, lump sum costs or contributions or financing not linked to costs). 5.2 Maximum grant amount The maximum grant amount is set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 3) and in the estimated budget (Annex 2). 5.3 Funding rate The funding rate for costs is 100% of the action’s eligible costs. Contributions are not subject to any funding rate. 5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding The estimated budget for the action is set out in Annex 2. It contains the estimated eligible costs and contributions for the action, broken down by participant and budget category. Annex 2 also shows the types of costs and contributions (forms of funding)9 to be used for each budget category. If unit costs or contributions are used, the details on the calculation will be explained in Annex 2a. 5.5 Budget flexibility The budget breakdown may be adjusted — without an amendment (see Article 39) — by transfers (between participants and budget categories), as long as this does not imply any substantive or important change to the description of the action in Annex 1. However: - changes to the budget category for volunteers (if used) always require an amendment - changes to budget categories with lump sums costs or contributions (if used; including financing not linked to costs) always require an amendment - changes to budget categories with higher funding rates or budget ceilings (if used) always require an amendment - addition of amounts for subcontracts not provided for in Annex 1 either require an amendment or simplified approval in accordance with Article 6.2 - other changes require an amendment or simplified approval, if specifically provided for in Article 6.2 - flexibility caps: not applicable. 9 See Article 125 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. 15 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS In order to be eligible, costs and contributions must meet the eligibility conditions set out in this Article. 6.1 General eligibility conditions The general eligibility conditions are the following: (a) for actual costs: (i) they must be actually incurred by the beneficiary (ii) they must be incurred in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21) (iii) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (iv) they must be incurred in connection with the action as described in Annex 1 and necessary for its implementation (v) they must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts in accordance with the accounting standards applicable in the country where the beneficiary is established and with the beneficiary’s usual cost accounting practices (vi) they must comply with the applicable national law on taxes, labour and social security and (vii) they must be reasonable, justified and must comply with the principle of sound financial management, in particular regarding economy and efficiency (b) for unit costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (ii) the units must: - be actually used or produced by the beneficiary in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of units relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be used or produced afterwards; see Article 21) - be necessary for the implementation of the action and (iii) the number of units must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular supported by records and documentation (see Article 20) (c) for flat-rate costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 16 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 (ii) the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied must: - be eligible - relate to the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs or contributions relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21) (d) for lump sum costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (ii) the work must be properly implemented by the beneficiary in accordance with Annex 1 (iii) the deliverables/outputs must be achieved in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of deliverables/outputs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be achieved afterwards; see Article 21) (e) for unit, flat-rate or lump sum costs or contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any): (i) they must fulfil the general eligibility conditions for the type of cost concerned (ii) the cost accounting practices must be applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding (f) for financing not linked to costs (if any): the results must be achieved or the conditions must be fulfilled as described in Annex 1. In addition, for direct cost categories (e.g. personnel, travel & subsistence, subcontracting and other direct costs) only costs that are directly linked to the action implementation and can therefore be attributed to it directly are eligible. They must not include any indirect costs (i.e. costs that are only indirectly linked to the action, e.g. via cost drivers). In-kind contributions provided by third parties free of charge may be declared as eligible direct costs by the beneficiaries which use them (under the same conditions as if they were their own, provided that they concern only direct costs and that the third parties and their in-kind contributions are set out in Annex 1 (or approved ex post in the periodic report, if their use does not entail changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants; ‘simplified approval procedure’). 6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category For each budget category, the specific eligibility conditions are as follows: Direct costs A. Personnel costs 17 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 A.1 Costs for employees (or equivalent) are eligible as personnel costs if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are related to personnel working for the beneficiary under an employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and assigned to the action. They must be limited to salaries (including net payments during parental leave), social security contributions, taxes and other costs linked to the remuneration, if they arise from national law or the employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, in accordance with the following method: {daily rate for the person multiplied by number of day-equivalents worked on the action (rounded up or down to the nearest half-day)}. The daily rate must be calculated as: {annual personnel costs for the person divided by 215}. The number of day-equivalents declared for a person must be identifiable and verifiable (see Article 20). The actual time spent on parental leave by a person assigned to the action may be deducted from the 215 days indicated in the above formula. The total number of day-equivalents declared in EU grants, for a person for a year, cannot be higher than 215, minus time spent on parental leave (if any). For personnel which receives supplementary payments for work in projects (project-based remuneration), the personnel costs must be calculated at a rate which: - corresponds to the actual remuneration costs paid by the beneficiary for the time worked by the person in the action over the reporting period - does not exceed the remuneration costs paid by the beneficiary for work in similar projects funded by national schemes (‘national projects reference’) - is defined based on objective criteria allowing to determine the amount to which the person is entitled and - reflects the usual practice of the beneficiary to pay consistently bonuses or supplementary payments for work in projects funded by national schemes. The national projects reference is the remuneration defined in national law, collective labour agreement or written internal rules of the beneficiary applicable to work in projects funded by national schemes. If there is no such national law, collective labour agreement or written internal rules or if the project- based remuneration is not based on objective criteria, the national project reference will be the average 18 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 remuneration of the person in the last full calendar year covered by the reporting period, excluding remuneration paid for work in EU actions. If the beneficiary uses average personnel costs (unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices), the personnel costs must fulfil the general eligibility conditions for such unit costs and the daily rate must be calculated: - using the actual personnel costs recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts and excluding any costs which are ineligible or already included in other budget categories; the actual personnel costs may be adjusted on the basis of budgeted or estimated elements, if they are relevant for calculating the personnel costs, reasonable and correspond to objective and verifiable information and - according to usual cost accounting practices which are applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding. A.2 and A.3 Costs for natural persons working under a direct contract other than an employment contract and costs for seconded persons by a third party against payment are also eligible as personnel costs, if they are assigned to the action, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and: (a) work under conditions similar to those of an employee (in particular regarding the way the work is organised, the tasks that are performed and the premises where they are performed) and (b) the result of the work belongs to the beneficiary (unless agreed otherwise). They must be calculated on the basis of a rate which corresponds to the costs actually incurred for the direct contract or secondment and must not be significantly different from those for personnel performing similar tasks under an employment contract with the beneficiary. A.4 The work of SME owners for the action (i.e. owners of beneficiaries that are small and medium- sized enterprises10 not receiving a salary) or natural person beneficiaries (i.e. beneficiaries that are natural persons not receiving a salary) may be declared as personnel costs, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are calculated as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a. A.6 For beneficiaries with personnel unit cost, the personnel costs under categories A.1-A.4 must be declared as unit cost and are eligible, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions, are calculated as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a and comply with the conditions set out in Points A.1-A.4 for the underlying types of costs (personnel). 10 For the definition, see Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC: micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) are enterprises - engaged in an economic activity, irrespective of their legal form (including, in particular, self- employed persons and family businesses engaged in craft or other activities, and partnerships or associations regularly engaged in an economic activity) and - employing fewer than 250 persons (expressed in ‘annual working units’ as defined in Article 5 of the Recommendation) and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million. 19 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 B. Subcontracting costs Subcontracting costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges, such as non- deductible or non-refundable value added tax (VAT)) are eligible, if they are calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are awarded using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure subcontracts with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12). Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement. Subcontracting may cover only a limited part of the action. The tasks to be subcontracted and the estimated cost for each subcontract must be set out in Annex 1 and the total estimated costs of subcontracting per beneficiary must be set out in Annex 2 (or may be approved ex post in the periodic report, if the use of subcontracting does not entail changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants; ‘simplified approval procedure’). C. Purchase costs Purchase costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges, such as non-deductible or non-refundable value added tax (VAT)) are eligible if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are bought using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure purchases with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12). Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement. C.1 Travel and subsistence Purchases for travel, accommodation and subsistence must be calculated as follows: - travel: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel - accommodation: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel - subsistence: on the basis of the costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel . C.2 Equipment Purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets used for the action must be declared as depreciation costs, calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred and written off in accordance with international accounting standards and the beneficiary’s usual accounting practices. Only the portion of the costs that corresponds to the rate of actual use for the action during the action duration can be taken into account. 20 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Costs for renting or leasing equipment, infrastructure or other assets are also eligible, if they do not exceed the depreciation costs of similar equipment, infrastructure or assets and do not include any financing fees. C.3 Other goods, works and services Purchases of other goods, works and services must be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred. Such goods, works and services include, for instance, consumables and supplies, promotion, dissemination, protection of results, translations, publications, certificates and financial guarantees, if required under the Agreement. D. Other cost categories D.2 Internally invoiced goods and services Costs for internally invoiced goods and services directly used for the action may be declared as unit cost according to usual cost accounting practices, if and as declared eligible in the call conditions, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions for such unit costs and the amount per unit is calculated: - using the actual costs for the good or service recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts, attributed either by direct measurement or on the basis of cost drivers, and excluding any cost which are ineligible or already included in other budget categories; the actual costs may be adjusted on the basis of budgeted or estimated elements, if they are relevant for calculating the costs, reasonable and correspond to objective and verifiable information and - according to usual cost accounting practices which are applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding. ‘Internally invoiced goods and services’ means goods or services which are provided within the beneficiary’s organisation directly for the action and which the beneficiary values on the basis of its usual cost accounting practices. This cost will not be taken into account for the indirect cost flat-rate. Indirect costs E. Indirect costs Indirect costs will be reimbursed at the flat-rate of 25% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs, subcontracting costs, financial support to third parties and exempted specific cost categories, if any). Contributions Not applicable 6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions 21 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The following costs or contributions are ineligible: (a) costs or contributions that do not comply with the conditions set out above (Article 6.1 and 6.2), in particular: (i) costs related to return on capital and dividends paid by a beneficiary (ii) debt and debt service charges (iii) provisions for future losses or debts (iv) interest owed (v) currency exchange losses (vi) bank costs charged by the beneficiary’s bank for transfers from the granting authority (vii) excessive or reckless expenditure (viii) deductible or refundable VAT (including VAT paid by public bodies acting as public authority) (ix) costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant agreement suspension (see Article 31) (x) in-kind contributions by third parties: not applicable (b) costs or contributions declared under other EU grants (or grants awarded by an EU Member State, non-EU country or other body implementing the EU budget), except for the following cases: (i) Synergy actions: not applicable (ii) if the action grant is combined with an operating grant11 running during the same period and the beneficiary can demonstrate that the operating grant does not cover any (direct or indirect) costs of the action grant (c) costs or contributions for staff of a national (or regional/local) administration, for activities that are part of the administration’s normal activities (i.e. not undertaken only because of the grant) (d) costs or contributions (especially travel and subsistence) for staff or representatives of EU institutions, bodies or agencies (e) other : (i) country restrictions for eligible costs: not applicable (ii) costs or contributions declared specifically ineligible in the call conditions. 6.4 Consequences of non-compliance 11 For the definition, see Article 180(2)(b) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: ‘operating grant’ means an EU grant to finance “the functioning of a body which has an objective forming part of and supporting an EU policy”. 22 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If a beneficiary declares costs or contributions that are ineligible, they will be rejected (see Article 27). This may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES The beneficiaries, as signatories of the Agreement, are fully responsible towards the granting authority for implementing it and for complying with all its obligations. They must implement the Agreement to their best abilities, in good faith and in accordance with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. They must have the appropriate resources to implement the action and implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with Article 11. If they rely on affiliated entities or other participants (see Articles 8 and 9), they retain sole responsibility towards the granting authority and the other beneficiaries. They are jointly responsible for the technical implementation of the action. If one of the beneficiaries fails to implement their part of the action, the other beneficiaries must ensure that this part is implemented by someone else (without being entitled to an increase of the maximum grant amount and subject to an amendment; see Article 39). The financial responsibility of each beneficiary in case of recoveries is governed by Article 22. The beneficiaries (and their action) must remain eligible under the EU programme funding the grant for the entire duration of the action. Costs and contributions will be eligible only as long as the beneficiary and the action are eligible. The internal roles and responsibilities of the beneficiaries are divided as follows: (a) Each beneficiary must: (i) keep information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date (see Article 19) (ii) inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) immediately of any events or circumstances likely to affect significantly or delay the implementation of the action (see Article 19) (iii) submit to the coordinator in good time: - the prefinancing guarantees (if required; see Article 23) - the financial statements and certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) - the contribution to the deliverables and technical reports (see Article 21) 23 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - any other documents or information required by the granting authority under the Agreement (iv) submit via the Portal data and information related to the participation of their affiliated entities. (b) The coordinator must: (i) monitor that the action is implemented properly (see Article 11) (ii) act as the intermediary for all communications between the consortium and the granting authority, unless the Agreement or granting authority specifies otherwise, and in particular: - submit the prefinancing guarantees to the granting authority (if any) - request and review any documents or information required and verify their quality and completeness before passing them on to the granting authority - submit the deliverables and reports to the granting authority - inform the granting authority about the payments made to the other beneficiaries (report on the distribution of payments; if required, see Articles 22 and 32) (iii) distribute the payments received from the granting authority to the other beneficiaries without unjustified delay (see Article 22). The coordinator may not delegate or subcontract the above-mentioned tasks to any other beneficiary or third party (including affiliated entities). However, coordinators which are public bodies may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(ii) last indent and (iii) above to entities with ‘authorisation to administer’ which they have created or which are controlled by or affiliated to them. In this case, the coordinator retains sole responsibility for the payments and for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. Moreover, coordinators which are ‘sole beneficiaries’12 (or similar, such as European research infrastructure consortia (ERICs)) may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(i) to (iii) above to one of their members. The coordinator retains sole responsibility for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. The beneficiaries must have internal arrangements regarding their operation and co-ordination, to ensure that the action is implemented properly. If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 1), these arrangements must be set out in a written consortium agreement between the beneficiaries, covering for instance: - the internal organisation of the consortium 12 For the definition, see Article 187(2) EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: “Where several entities satisfy the criteria for being awarded a grant and together form one entity, that entity may be treated as the sole beneficiary, including where it is specifically established for the purpose of implementing the action financed by the grant.” 24 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - the management of access to the Portal - different distribution keys for the payments and financial responsibilities in case of recoveries (if any) - additional rules on rights and obligations related to background and results (see Article 16) - settlement of internal disputes - liability, indemnification and confidentiality arrangements between the beneficiaries. The internal arrangements must not contain any provision contrary to this Agreement. ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES The following entities which are linked to a beneficiary will participate in the action as ‘affiliated entities’: - FUNDACION ICAMCYL (ICAMCYL), PIC 911063674, linked to CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) - CogniSensus IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUCHIKI ETAIREIA (CogniSensus), PIC 877176918, linked to EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON (ICCS) Affiliated entities can charge costs and contributions to the action under the same conditions as the beneficiaries and must implement the action tasks attributed to them in Annex 1 in accordance with Article 11. Their costs and contributions will be included in Annex 2 and will be taken into account for the calculation of the grant. The beneficiaries must ensure that all their obligations under this Agreement also apply to their affiliated entities. The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the affiliated entities. Breaches by affiliated entities will be handled in the same manner as breaches by beneficiaries. Recovery of undue amounts will be handled through the beneficiaries. If the granting authority requires joint and several liability of affiliated entities (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4), they must sign the declaration set out in Annex 3a and may be held liable in case of enforced recoveries against their beneficiaries (see Article 22.2 and 22.4). ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION 9.1 Associated partners Not applicable 25 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action Other third parties may give in-kind contributions to the action (i.e. personnel, equipment, other goods, works and services, etc. which are free-of-charge) if necessary for the implementation. Third parties giving in-kind contributions do not implement any action tasks. They may not charge costs or contributions to the action, but the costs for the in-kind contributions are eligible and may be charged by the beneficiaries which use them, under the conditions set out in Article 6. The costs will be included in Annex 2 as part of the beneficiaries’ costs. The third parties and their in-kind contributions should be set out in Annex 1. The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the third parties giving in-kind contributions. 9.3 Subcontractors Subcontractors may participate in the action, if necessary for the implementation. Subcontractors must implement their action tasks in accordance with Article 11. The costs for the subcontracted tasks (invoiced price from the subcontractor) are eligible and may be charged by the beneficiaries, under the conditions set out in Article 6. The costs will be included in Annex 2 as part of the beneficiaries’ costs. The beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 11 (proper implementation), 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping) also apply to the subcontractors. The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the subcontractors. 9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties If the action includes providing financial support to third parties (e.g. grants, prizes or similar forms of support), the beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping)also apply to the third parties receiving the support (recipients). The beneficiaries must also ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the recipients. ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS 10.1 Non-EU participants Participants which are established in a non-EU country (if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and: - to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, 26 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data) - for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use qualified external auditors which are independent and comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC13 - for the controls under Article 25: to allow for checks, reviews, audits and investigations (including on-the-spot checks, visits and inspections) by the bodies mentioned in that Article (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.). Special rules on dispute settlement apply (see Data Sheet, Point 5). 10.2 Participants which are international organisations Participants which are international organisations (IOs; if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and: - to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data) - for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use either independent public officers or external auditors which comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC - for the controls under Article 25: to allow for the checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the bodies mentioned in that Article, taking into account the specific agreements concluded by them and the EU (if any). For such participants, nothing in the Agreement will be interpreted as a waiver of their privileges or immunities, as accorded by their constituent documents or international law. Special rules on applicable law and dispute settlement apply (see Article 43 and Data Sheet, Point 5). 10.3 Pillar-assessed participants Pillar-assessed participants (if any) may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in so far as they have been positively assessed and do not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries. ‘Pillar-assessment’ means a review by the European Commission on the systems, rules and procedures which participants use for managing EU grants (in particular internal control system, accounting system, external audits, financing of third parties, rules on recovery and exclusion, information on recipients and protection of personal data; see Article 154 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046). Participants with a positive pillar assessment may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in particular for: 13 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts or similar national regulations (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87). 27 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - record-keeping (Article 20): may be done in accordance with internal standards, rules and procedures - currency conversion for financial statements (Article 21): may be done in accordance with usual accounting practices - guarantees (Article 23): for public law bodies, prefinancing guarantees are not needed - certificates (Article 24): - certificates on the financial statements (CFS): may be provided by their regular internal or external auditors and in accordance with their internal financial regulations and procedures - certificates on usual accounting practices (CoMUC): are not needed if those practices are covered by an ex-ante assessment and use the following specific rules, for: - recoveries (Article 22): in case of financial support to third parties, there will be no recovery if the participant has done everything possible to retrieve the undue amounts from the third party receiving the support (including legal proceedings) and non-recovery is not due to an error or negligence on its part - checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the EU (Article 25): will be conducted taking into account the rules and procedures specifically agreed between them and the framework agreement (if any) - impact evaluation (Article 26): will be conducted in accordance with the participant’s internal rules and procedures and the framework agreement (if any) - grant agreement suspension (Article 31): certain costs incurred during grant suspension are eligible (notably, minimum costs necessary for a possible resumption of the action and costs relating to contracts which were entered into before the pre-information letter was received and which could not reasonably be suspended, reallocated or terminated on legal grounds) - grant agreement termination (Article 32): the final grant amount and final payment will be calculated taking into account also costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination takes effect, if the contract was entered into before the pre-information letter was received and could not reasonably be terminated on legal grounds - liability for damages (Article 33.2): the granting authority must be compensated for damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement only if the damage is due to an infringement of the participant’s internal rules and procedures or due to a violation of third parties’ rights by the participant or one of its employees or individual for whom the employees are responsible. Participants whose pillar assessment covers procurement and granting procedures may also do purchases, subcontracting and financial support to third parties (Article 6.2) in accordance with their internal rules and procedures for purchases, subcontracting and financial support. 28 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Participants whose pillar assessment covers data protection rules may rely on their internal standards, rules and procedures for data protection (Article 15). The participants may however not rely on provisions which would breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries or call into question the decision awarding the grant, such as in particular: - eligibility (Article 6) - consortium roles and set-up (Articles 7-9) - security and ethics (Articles 13, 14) - IPR (including background and results, access rights and rights of use), communication, dissemination and visibility (Articles 16 and 17) - information obligation (Article 19) - payment, reporting and amendments (Articles 21, 22 and 39) - rejections, reductions, suspensions and terminations (Articles 27, 28, 29-32) If the pillar assessment was subject to remedial measures, reliance on the internal systems, rules and procedures is subject to compliance with those remedial measures. Participants whose assessment has not yet been updated to cover (the new rules on) data protection may rely on their internal systems, rules and procedures, provided that they ensure that personal data is: - processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject - collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes - adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed - accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date - kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data is processed and - processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data. Participants must inform the coordinator without delay of any changes to the systems, rules and procedures that were part of the pillar assessment. The coordinator must immediately inform the granting authority. Pillar-assessed participants that have also concluded a framework agreement with the EU, may moreover — under the same conditions as those above (i.e. not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries) — rely on the provisions set out in that framework agreement. 29 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION 11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action The beneficiaries must implement the action as described in Annex 1 and in compliance with the provisions of the Agreement, the call conditions and all legal obligations under applicable EU, international and national law. 11.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS 12.1 Conflict of interests The beneficiaries must take all measures to prevent any situation where the impartial and objective implementation of the Agreement could be compromised for reasons involving family, emotional life, political or national affinity, economic interest or any other direct or indirect interest (‘conflict of interests’). They must formally notify the granting authority without delay of any situation constituting or likely to lead to a conflict of interests and immediately take all the necessary steps to rectify this situation. The granting authority may verify that the measures taken are appropriate and may require additional measures to be taken by a specified deadline. 12.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the beneficiary may be terminated (see Article 32). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY 13.1 Sensitive information The parties must keep confidential any data, documents or other material (in any form) that is identified as sensitive in writing (‘sensitive information’) — during the implementation of the action and for at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). If a beneficiary requests, the granting authority may agree to keep such information confidential for a longer period. 30 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Unless otherwise agreed between the parties, they may use sensitive information only to implement the Agreement. The beneficiaries may disclose sensitive information to their personnel or other participants involved in the action only if they: (a) need to know it in order to implement the Agreement and (b) are bound by an obligation of confidentiality. The granting authority may disclose sensitive information to its staff and to other EU institutions and bodies. It may moreover disclose sensitive information to third parties, if: (a) this is necessary to implement the Agreement or safeguard the EU financial interests and (b) the recipients of the information are bound by an obligation of confidentiality. The confidentiality obligations no longer apply if: (a) the disclosing party agrees to release the other party (b) the information becomes publicly available, without breaching any confidentiality obligation (c) the disclosure of the sensitive information is required by EU, international or national law. Specific confidentiality rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 13.2 Classified information The parties must handle classified information in accordance with the applicable EU, international or national law on classified information (in particular, Decision 2015/44414 and its implementing rules). Deliverables which contain classified information must be submitted according to special procedures agreed with the granting authority. Action tasks involving classified information may be subcontracted only after explicit approval (in writing) from the granting authority. Classified information may not be disclosed to any third party (including participants involved in the action implementation) without prior explicit written approval from the granting authority. Specific security rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 13.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). 14 Commission Decision 2015/444/EC, Euratom of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 53). 31 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES 14.1 Ethics The action must be carried out in line with the highest ethical standards and the applicable EU, international and national law on ethical principles. Specific ethics rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 14.2 Values The beneficiaries must commit to and ensure the respect of basic EU values (such as respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights, including the rights of minorities). Specific rules on values (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 14.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION 15.1 Data processing by the granting authority Any personal data under the Agreement will be processed under the responsibility of the data controller of the granting authority in accordance with and for the purposes set out in the Portal Privacy Statement. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission, an EU regulatory or executive agency, joint undertaking or other EU body, the processing will be subject to Regulation 2018/172515. 15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries The beneficiaries must process personal data under the Agreement in compliance with the applicable EU, international and national law on data protection (in particular, Regulation 2016/67916). They must ensure that personal data is: 15 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39). 16 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (‘GDPR’) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). 32 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subjects - collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes - adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed - accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date - kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data is processed and - processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the data. The beneficiaries may grant their personnel access to personal data only if it is strictly necessary for implementing, managing and monitoring the Agreement. The beneficiaries must ensure that the personnel is under a confidentiality obligation. The beneficiaries must inform the persons whose data are transferred to the granting authority and provide them with the Portal Privacy Statement. 15.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS —ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE 16.1 Background and access rights to background The beneficiaries must give each other and the other participants access to the background identified as needed for implementing the action, subject to any specific rules in Annex 5. ‘Background’ means any data, know-how or information — whatever its form or nature (tangible or intangible), including any rights such as intellectual property rights — that is: (a) held by the beneficiaries before they acceded to the Agreement and (b) needed to implement the action or exploit the results. If background is subject to rights of a third party, the beneficiary concerned must ensure that it is able to comply with its obligations under the Agreement. 16.2 Ownership of results The granting authority does not obtain ownership of the results produced under the action. ‘Results’ means any tangible or intangible effect of the action, such as data, know-how or information, 33 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 whatever its form or nature, whether or not it can be protected, as well as any rights attached to it, including intellectual property rights. 16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes The granting authority has the right to use non-sensitive information relating to the action and materials and documents received from the beneficiaries (notably summaries for publication, deliverables, as well as any other material, such as pictures or audio-visual material, in paper or electronic form) for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes — during the action or afterwards. The right to use the beneficiaries’ materials, documents and information is granted in the form of a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable licence, which includes the following rights: (a) use for its own purposes (in particular, making them available to persons working for the granting authority or any other EU service (including institutions, bodies, offices, agencies, etc.) or EU Member State institution or body; copying or reproducing them in whole or in part, in unlimited numbers; and communication through press information services) (b) distribution to the public (in particular, publication as hard copies and in electronic or digital format, publication on the internet, as a downloadable or non-downloadable file, broadcasting by any channel, public display or presentation, communicating through press information services, or inclusion in widely accessible databases or indexes) (c) editing or redrafting (including shortening, summarising, inserting other elements (e.g. meta-data, legends, other graphic, visual, audio or text elements), extracting parts (e.g. audio or video files), dividing into parts, use in a compilation) (d) translation (e) storage in paper, electronic or other form (f) archiving, in line with applicable document-management rules (g) the right to authorise third parties to act on its behalf or sub-license to third parties the modes of use set out in Points (b), (c), (d) and (f), if needed for the information, communication and publicity activity of the granting authority (h) processing, analysing, aggregating the materials, documents and information received and producing derivative works. The rights of use are granted for the whole duration of the industrial or intellectual property rights concerned. If materials or documents are subject to moral rights or third party rights (including intellectual property rights or rights of natural persons on their image and voice), the beneficiaries must ensure that they comply with their obligations under this Agreement (in particular, by obtaining the necessary licences and authorisations from the rights holders concerned). Where applicable, the granting authority will insert the following information: 34 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 “© – [year] – [name of the copyright owner]. All rights reserved. Licensed to the [name of granting authority] under conditions.” 16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background Specific rules regarding intellectual property rights, results and background (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 16.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY 17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, the beneficiaries must promote the action and its results by providing targeted information to multiple audiences (including the media and the public), in accordance with Annex 1 and in a strategic, coherent and effective manner. Before engaging in a communication or dissemination activity expected to have a major media impact, the beneficiaries must inform the granting authority. 17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, communication activities of the beneficiaries related to the action (including media relations, conferences, seminars, information material, such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations, etc., in electronic form, via traditional or social media, etc.), dissemination activities and any infrastructure, equipment, vehicles, supplies or major result funded by the grant must acknowledge EU support and display the European flag (emblem) and funding statement (translated into local languages, where appropriate): 35 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The emblem must remain distinct and separate and cannot be modified by adding other visual marks, brands or text. Apart from the emblem, no other visual identity or logo may be used to highlight the EU support. When displayed in association with other logos (e.g. of beneficiaries or sponsors), the emblem must be displayed at least as prominently and visibly as the other logos. For the purposes of their obligations under this Article, the beneficiaries may use the emblem without first obtaining approval from the granting authority. This does not, however, give them the right to exclusive use. Moreover, they may not appropriate the emblem or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means. 17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer Any communication or dissemination activity related to the action must use factually accurate information. Moreover, it must indicate the following disclaimer (translated into local languages where appropriate): “Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or [name of the granting authority]. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.” 17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 17.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION 18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action Specific rules for implementing the action (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 18.2 Consequences of non-compliance 36 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS 19.1 Information requests The beneficiaries must provide — during the action or afterwards and in accordance with Article 7 — any information requested in order to verify eligibility of the costs or contributions declared, proper implementation of the action and compliance with the other obligations under the Agreement. The information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. 19.2 Participant Register data updates The beneficiaries must keep — at all times, during the action or afterwards — their information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date, in particular, their name, address, legal representatives, legal form and organisation type. 19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action The beneficiaries must immediately inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) of any of the following: (a) events which are likely to affect or delay the implementation of the action or affect the EU’s financial interests, in particular: (i) changes in their legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour signed before grant signature) (ii) linked action information: not applicable (b) circumstances affecting: (i) the decision to award the grant or (ii) compliance with requirements under the Agreement. 19.4 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. 37 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING 20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents The beneficiaries must — at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6) — keep records and other supporting documents to prove the proper implementation of the action in line with the accepted standards in the respective field (if any). In addition, the beneficiaries must — for the same period — keep the following to justify the amounts declared: (a) for actual costs: adequate records and supporting documents to prove the costs declared (such as contracts, subcontracts, invoices and accounting records); in addition, the beneficiaries’ usual accounting and internal control procedures must enable direct reconciliation between the amounts declared, the amounts recorded in their accounts and the amounts stated in the supporting documents (b) for flat-rate costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the eligibility of the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied (c) for the following simplified costs and contributions: the beneficiaries do not need to keep specific records on the actual costs incurred, but must keep: (i) for unit costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the number of units declared (ii) for lump sum costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove proper implementation of the work as described in Annex 1 (iii) for financing not linked to costs (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the achievement of the results or the fulfilment of the conditions as described in Annex 1 (d) for unit, flat-rate and lump sum costs and contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any): the beneficiaries must keep any adequate records and supporting documents to prove that their cost accounting practices have been applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding, and that they comply with the eligibility conditions set out in Articles 6.1 and 6.2. Moreover, the following is needed for specific budget categories: (e) for personnel costs: time worked for the beneficiary under the action must be supported by declarations signed monthly by the person and their supervisor, unless another reliable time-record system is in place; the granting authority may accept alternative evidence supporting the time worked for the action declared, if it considers that it offers an adequate level of assurance (f) additional record-keeping rules: not applicable The records and supporting documents must be made available upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25). 38 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If there are on-going checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims under the Agreement (including the extension of findings; see Article 25), the beneficiaries must keep these records and other supporting documentation until the end of these procedures. The beneficiaries must keep the original documents. Digital and digitalised documents are considered originals if they are authorised by the applicable national law. The granting authority may accept non-original documents if they offer a comparable level of assurance. 20.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING 21.1 Continuous reporting The beneficiaries must continuously report on the progress of the action (e.g. deliverables, milestones, outputs/outcomes, critical risks, indicators, etc; if any), in the Portal Continuous Reporting tool and in accordance with the timing and conditions it sets out (as agreed with the granting authority). Standardised deliverables (e.g. progress reports not linked to payments, reports on cumulative expenditure, special reports, etc; if any) must be submitted using the templates published on the Portal. 21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements In addition, the beneficiaries must provide reports to request payments, in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2): - for additional prefinancings (if any): an additional prefinancing report - for interim payments (if any) and the final payment: a periodic report. The prefinancing and periodic reports include a technical and financial part. The technical part includes an overview of the action implementation. It must be prepared using the template available in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool. The financial part of the additional prefinancing report includes a statement on the use of the previous prefinancing payment. The financial part of the periodic report includes: - the financial statements (individual and consolidated; for all beneficiaries/affiliated entities) - the explanation on the use of resources (or detailed cost reporting table, if required) 39 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - the certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Article 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3). The financial statements must detail the eligible costs and contributions for each budget category and, for the final payment, also the revenues for the action (see Articles 6 and 22). All eligible costs and contributions incurred should be declared, even if they exceed the amounts indicated in the estimated budget (see Annex 2). Amounts that are not declared in the individual financial statements will not be taken into account by the granting authority. By signing the financial statements (directly in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool), the beneficiaries confirm that: - the information provided is complete, reliable and true - the costs and contributions declared are eligible (see Article 6) - the costs and contributions can be substantiated by adequate records and supporting documents (see Article 20) that will be produced upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits and investigations (see Article 25) - for the final periodic report: all the revenues have been declared (if required; see Article 22). Beneficiaries will have to submit also the financial statements of their affiliated entities (if any). In case of recoveries (see Article 22), beneficiaries will be held responsible also for the financial statements of their affiliated entities. 21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros The financial statements must be drafted in euro. Beneficiaries with general accounts established in a currency other than the euro must convert the costs recorded in their accounts into euro, at the average of the daily exchange rates published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union (ECB website), calculated over the corresponding reporting period. If no daily euro exchange rate is published in the Official Journal for the currency in question, they must be converted at the average of the monthly accounting exchange rates published on the European Commission website (InforEuro), calculated over the corresponding reporting period. Beneficiaries with general accounts in euro must convert costs incurred in another currency into euro according to their usual accounting practices. 21.4 Reporting language The reporting must be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 21.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a report submitted does not comply with this Article, the granting authority may suspend the payment deadline (see Article 29) and apply other measures described in Chapter 5. 40 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If the coordinator breaches its reporting obligations, the granting authority may terminate the grant or the coordinator’s participation (see Article 32) or apply other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE 22.1 Payments and payment arrangements Payments will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). They will be made in euro to the bank account indicated by the coordinator (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) and must be distributed without unjustified delay (restrictions may apply to distribution of the initial prefinancing payment; see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). Payments to this bank account will discharge the granting authority from its payment obligation. The cost of payment transfers will be borne as follows: - the granting authority bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank - the beneficiary bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank - the party causing a repetition of a transfer bears all costs of the repeated transfer. Payments by the granting authority will be considered to have been carried out on the date when they are debited to its account. 22.2 Recoveries Recoveries will be made, if — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — it turns out that the granting authority has paid too much and needs to recover the amounts undue. Each beneficiary’s financial responsibility in case of recovery is in principle limited to their own debt and undue amounts of their affiliated entities. In case of enforced recoveries (see Article 22.4), affiliated entities will be held liable for repaying debts of their beneficiaries, if required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4). 22.3 Amounts due 22.3.1 Prefinancing payments The aim of the prefinancing is to provide the beneficiaries with a float. It remains the property of the EU until the final payment. For initial prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). For additional prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are also set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). However, if the statement on the use of the previous prefinancing 41 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 payment shows that less than 70% was used, the amount set out in the Data Sheet will be reduced by the difference between the 70% threshold and the amount used. The contribution to the Mutual Insurance Mechanism will be retained from the prefinancing payments (at the rate and in accordance with the modalities set out in the Data Sheet, see Point 4.2) and transferred to the Mechanism. Prefinancing payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). 22.3.2 Amount due at beneficiary termination — Recovery In case of beneficiary termination, the granting authority will determine the provisional amount due for the beneficiary concerned. Payments (if any) will be made with the next interim or final payment. The amount due will be calculated in the following step: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of the beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary. The balance is then calculated by deducting the payments received (if any; see report on the distribution of payments in Article 32), from the total accepted EU contribution: {total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary minus {prefinancing and interim payments received (if any)}}. If the balance is positive, the amount will be included in the next interim or final payment to the consortium. If the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: 42 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount due, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered and ask this amount to be paid to the coordinator (confirmation letter). If payment is not made to the coordinator by the date specified in the confirmation letter, the granting authority may call on the Mutual Insurance Mechanism to intervene, if continuation of the action is guaranteed and the conditions set out in the rules governing the Mechanism are met. In this case, it will send a beneficiary recovery letter, together with a debit note with the terms and date for payment. The debit note for the beneficiary will include the amount calculated for the affiliated entities which also had to end their participation (if any). If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4. The amounts will later on also be taken into account for the next interim or final payment. 22.3.3 Interim payments Interim payments reimburse the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action during the reporting periods (if any). Interim payments (if any) will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). Payment is subject to the approval of the periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content. The interim payment will be calculated by the granting authority in the following steps: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for the reporting period, by first calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs, and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions from beneficiary termination (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’. Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling 43 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The resulting amount is then capped to ensure that the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments (if any) does not exceed the interim payment ceiling set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). Interim payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). 22.3.4 Final payment — Final grant amount — Revenues and Profit — Recovery The final payment (payment of the balance) reimburses the remaining part of the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action (if any). The final payment will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). Payment is subject to the approval of the final periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content. The final grant amount for the action will be calculated in the following steps: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the total accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs, CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’. Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount If the resulting amount is higher than the maximum grant amount set out in Article 5.2, it will be limited to the latter. Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule If the no-profit rule is provided for in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2), the grant must not produce a profit (i.e. surplus of the amount obtained following Step 2 plus the action’s revenues, over the eligible costs and contributions approved by the granting authority). 44 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 ‘Revenue’ is all income generated by the action, during its duration (see Article 4), for beneficiaries that are profit legal entities (— with the exception of income generated by the exploitation of results, which are not considered as revenues). If there is a profit, it will be deducted in proportion to the final rate of reimbursement of the eligible costs approved by the granting authority (as compared to the amount calculated following Steps 1 and 2 minus the contributions). The balance (final payment) is then calculated by deducting the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments already made (if any), from the final grant amount: {final grant amount minus {prefinancing and interim payments made (if any)}}. If the balance is positive, it will be paid to the coordinator. The amount retained for the Mutual Insurance Mechanism (see above) will be released and paid to the coordinator (in accordance with the rules governing the Mechanism). The final payment (or part of it) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). If — despite the release of the Mutual Insurance Mechanism contribution — the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator: - formally notifying the intention to recover, the final grant amount, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why - requesting a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiaries within 30 days of receiving notification and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received) and the coordinator has submitted the report on the distribution of payments, it will calculate the share of the debt per beneficiary, by: (a) identifying the beneficiaries for which the amount calculated as follows is negative: {{{total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary divided by 45 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 total accepted EU contribution for the action} multiplied by final grant amount for the action}, minus {prefinancing and interim payments received by the beneficiary (if any)} } and (b) dividing the debt: {{amount calculated according to point (a) for the beneficiary concerned divided by the sum of the amounts calculated according to point (a) for all the beneficiaries identified according to point (a)} multiplied by the amount to be recovered}. and confirm the amount to be recovered from each beneficiary concerned (confirmation letter), together with debit notes with the terms and date for payment. The debit notes for beneficiaries will include the amounts calculated for their affiliated entities (if any). If the coordinator has not submitted the report on the distribution of payments, the granting authority will recover the full amount from the coordinator (confirmation letter and debit note with the terms and date for payment). If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4. 22.3.5 Audit implementation after final payment — Revised final grant amount — Recovery If — after the final payment (in particular, after checks, reviews, audits or investigations; see Article 25) — the granting authority rejects costs or contributions (see Article 27) or reduces the grant (see Article 28), it will calculate the revised final grant amount for the beneficiary concerned. The beneficiary revised final grant amount will be calculated in the following step: Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘revised accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary, by calculating the ‘revised accepted costs’ and ‘revised accepted contributions’. After that, it will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting ‘revised total accepted EU contribution’ is the beneficiary revised final grant amount. 46 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If the revised final grant amount is lower than the beneficiary’s final grant amount (i.e. its share in the final grant amount for the action), it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The beneficiary final grant amount (i.e. share in the final grant amount for the action) is calculated as follows: {{total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary divided by total accepted EU contribution for the action} multiplied by final grant amount for the action}. The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered (confirmation letter), together with a debit note with the terms and the date for payment. Recoveries against affiliated entities (if any) will be handled through their beneficiaries. If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4. 22.4 Enforced recovery If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the amount due will be recovered: (a) by offsetting the amount — without the coordinator or beneficiary’s consent — against any amounts owed to the coordinator or beneficiary by the granting authority. In exceptional circumstances, to safeguard the EU financial interests, the amount may be offset before the payment date specified in the debit note. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, debts may also be offset against amounts owed by other Commission services or executive agencies. (b) financial guarantee(s): not applicable (c) joint and several liability of beneficiaries: not applicable (d) by holding affiliated entities jointly and severally liable (if any, see Data Sheet, Point 4.4) (e) by taking legal action (see Article 43) or, provided that the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, by adopting an enforceable decision under Article 299 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 100(2) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. 47 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 If the Mutual Insurance Mechanism was called on by the granting authority to intervene, recovery will be continued in the name of the Mutual Insurance Mechanism. If two debit notes were sent, the second one (in the name of the Mutual Insurance Mechanism) will be considered to replace the first one (in the name of the granting authority). Where the MIM intervened, offsetting, enforceable decisions or any other of the above-mentioned forms of enforced recovery may be used mutatis mutandis. The amount to be recovered will be increased by late-payment interest at the rate set out in Article 22.5, from the day following the payment date in the debit note, up to and including the date the full payment is received. Partial payments will be first credited against expenses, charges and late-payment interest and then against the principal. Bank charges incurred in the recovery process will be borne by the beneficiary, unless Directive 2015/236617 applies. For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency, enforced recovery by offsetting or enforceable decision will be done by the services of the European Commission (see also Article 43). 22.5 Consequences of non-compliance 22.5.1 If the granting authority does not pay within the payment deadlines (see above), the beneficiaries are entitled to late-payment interest at the rate applied by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations in euros (‘reference rate’), plus the rate specified in the Data Sheet (Point 4.2). The reference rate is the rate in force on the first day of the month in which the payment deadline expires, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union. If the late-payment interest is lower than or equal to EUR 200, it will be paid to the coordinator only on request submitted within two months of receiving the late payment. Late-payment interest is not due if all beneficiaries are EU Member States (including regional and local government authorities or other public bodies acting on behalf of a Member State for the purpose of this Agreement). If payments or the payment deadline are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30), payment will not be considered as late. Late-payment interest covers the period running from the day following the due date for payment (see above), up to and including the date of payment. Late-payment interest is not considered for the purposes of calculating the final grant amount. 22.5.2 If the coordinator breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the coordinator may be terminated (see Article 32). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES 17 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35). 48 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Not applicable ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES 24.1 Operational verification report (OVR) Not applicable 24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS) If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.3), the beneficiaries must provide certificates on their financial statements (CFS), in accordance with the schedule, threshold and conditions set out in the Data Sheet. The coordinator must submit them as part of the periodic report (see Article 21). The certificates must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal, cover the costs declared on the basis of actual costs and costs according to usual cost accounting practices (if any), and fulfil the following conditions: (a) be provided by a qualified approved external auditor which is independent and complies with Directive 2006/43/EC18 (or for public bodies: by a competent independent public officer) (b) the verification must be carried out according to the highest professional standards to ensure that the financial statements comply with the provisions under the Agreement and that the costs declared are eligible. The certificates will not affect the granting authority's right to carry out its own checks, reviews or audits, nor preclude the European Court of Auditors (ECA), the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) or the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) from using their prerogatives for audits and investigations under the Agreement (see Article 25). If the costs (or a part of them) were already audited by the granting authority, these costs do not need to be covered by the certificate and will not be counted for calculating the threshold (if any). 24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC) Not applicable 24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA) Beneficiaries which: - use unit, flat rate or lump sum costs or contributions according to documented (i.e. formally approved and in writing) usual costs accounting practices (if any) or - have formalised documentation on the systems and processes for calculating their costs and contributions (i.e. formally approved and in writing), have participated in at least 150 actions under Horizon 2020 or the Euratom Research and Training Programme (2014-2018 or 18 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts or similar national regulations (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87). 49 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 2019-2020) and participate in at least 3 ongoing actions under Horizon Europe or the Euratom Research and Training Programme (2021-2025 or 2026-2027) may apply to the granting authority for a systems and process audit (SPA). This audit will be carried out as follows: Step 1 – Application by the beneficiary. Step 2 – If the application is accepted, the granting authority will carry out the systems and process audit, complemented by an audit of transactions (on a sample of the beneficiary’s Horizon Europe or the Euratom Research and Training Programme financial statements). Step 3 – The audit result will take the form of a risk assessment classification for the beneficiary: low, medium or high. Low-risk beneficiaries will benefit from less (or less in-depth) ex-post audits (see Article 25) and a higher threshold for submitting certificates on the financial statements (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3). 24.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary does not submit a certificate on the financial statements (CFS) or the certificate is rejected, the accepted EU contribution to costs will be capped to reflect the CFS threshold. If a beneficiary breaches any of its other obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS 25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits 25.1.1 Internal checks The granting authority may — during the action or afterwards — check the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement, including assessing costs and contributions, deliverables and reports. 25.1.2 Project reviews The granting authority may carry out reviews on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement (general project reviews or specific issues reviews). Such project reviews may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent, outside experts. If it uses outside experts, the coordinator or beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest. 50 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The coordinator or beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information and data in addition to deliverables and reports already submitted (including information on the use of resources). The granting authority may request beneficiaries to provide such information to it directly. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may be requested to participate in meetings, including with the outside experts. For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including to the outside experts) and must ensure that information requested is readily available. Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. On the basis of the review findings, a project review report will be drawn up. The granting authority will formally notify the project review report to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations. Project reviews (including project review reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 25.1.3 Audits The granting authority may carry out audits on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. Such audits may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. The granting authority may use its own audit service, delegate audits to a centralised service or use external audit firms. If it uses an external firm, the beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest. The beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data) to verify compliance with the Agreement. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13. For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including for the external audit firm) and must ensure that information requested is readily available. Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. On the basis of the audit findings, a draft audit report will be drawn up. The auditors will formally notify the draft audit report to the beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations (contradictory audit procedure). 51 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The final audit report will take into account observations by the beneficiary concerned and will be formally notified to them. Audits (including audit reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities Where the granting authority is not the European Commission, the latter has the same rights of checks, reviews and audits as the granting authority. 25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding The beneficiaries must give the European Commission access to their statutory records for the periodic assessment of simplified forms of funding which are used in EU programmes. 25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations The following bodies may also carry out checks, reviews, audits and investigations — during the action or afterwards: - the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) under Regulations No 883/201319 and No 2185/9620 - the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) under Regulation 2017/1939 - the European Court of Auditors (ECA) under Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 257 of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. If requested by these bodies, the beneficiary concerned must provide full, accurate and complete information in the format requested (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data, including in electronic format) and allow access to sites and premises for on-the-spot visits or inspections — as provided for under these Regulations. To this end, the beneficiary concerned must keep all relevant information relating to the action, at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (Point 6) and, in any case, until any ongoing checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims have been concluded. 25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations 25.5.1 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations in this grant Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations carried out in the context of this grant may lead to rejections (see Article 27), grant reduction (see Article 28) or other measures described in Chapter 5. 19 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18/09/2013, p. 1). 20 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15/11/1996, p. 2). 52 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Rejections or grant reductions after the final payment will lead to a revised final grant amount (see Article 22). Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations during the action implementation may lead to a request for amendment (see Article 39), to change the description of the action set out in Annex 1. Checks, reviews, audits or investigations that find systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations in any EU grant may also lead to consequences in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions (‘extension to other grants’). Moreover, findings arising from an OLAF or EPPO investigation may lead to criminal prosecution under national law. 25.5.2 Extension from other grants Results of checks, reviews, audits or investigations in other grants may be extended to this grant, if: (a) the beneficiary concerned is found, in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions, to have committed systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant and (b) those findings are formally notified to the beneficiary concerned — together with the list of grants affected by the findings — within the time-limit for audits set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned of the intention to extend the findings and the list of grants affected. If the extension concerns rejections of costs or contributions: the notification will include: (a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings (b) the request to submit revised financial statements for all grants affected (c) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors, to calculate the amounts to be rejected, if the beneficiary concerned: (i) considers that the submission of revised financial statements is not possible or practicable or (ii) does not submit revised financial statements. If the extension concerns grant reductions: the notification will include: (a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings and (b) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors and the principle of proportionality. The beneficiary concerned has 60 days from receiving notification to submit observations, revised financial statements or to propose a duly substantiated alternative correction method/rate. On the basis of this, the granting authority will analyse the impact and decide on the implementation 53 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 (i.e. start rejection or grant reduction procedures, either on the basis of the revised financial statements or the announced/alternative method/rate or a mix of those; see Articles 27 and 28). 25.6 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS 26.1 Impact evaluation The granting authority may carry out impact evaluations of the action, measured against the objectives and indicators of the EU programme funding the grant. Such evaluations may be started during implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiaries and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent outside experts. The coordinator or beneficiaries must provide any information relevant to evaluate the impact of the action, including information in electronic format. 26.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5. CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS 27.1 Conditions The granting authority will — at beneficiary termination, interim payment, final payment or afterwards — reject any costs or contributions which are ineligible (see Article 6), in particular following checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25). The rejection may also be based on the extension of findings from other grants to this grant (see Article 25). Ineligible costs or contributions will be rejected. 54 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 27.2 Procedure If the rejection does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the rejection, the amounts and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the rejection (payment review procedure). If the rejection leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22. 27.3 Effects If the granting authority rejects costs or contributions, it will deduct them from the costs or contributions declared and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22). ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION 28.1 Conditions The granting authority may — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — reduce the grant for a beneficiary, if: (a) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (see Article 25). The amount of the reduction will be calculated for each beneficiary concerned and proportionate to the seriousness and the duration of the errors, irregularities or fraud or breach of obligations, by applying an individual reduction rate to their accepted EU contribution. 28.2 Procedure If the grant reduction does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the reduction, the amount to be reduced and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the reduction (payment review procedure). If the grant reduction leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22. 55 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 28.3 Effects If the granting authority reduces the grant, it will deduct the reduction and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22). SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION 29.1 Conditions The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend the payment deadline if a payment cannot be processed because: (a) the required report (see Article 21) has not been submitted or is not complete or additional information is needed (b) there are doubts about the amount to be paid (e.g. ongoing audit extension procedure, queries about eligibility, need for a grant reduction, etc.) and additional checks, reviews, audits or investigations are necessary, or (c) there are other issues affecting the EU financial interests. 29.2 Procedure The granting authority will formally notify the coordinator of the suspension and the reasons why. The suspension will take effect the day the notification is sent. If the conditions for suspending the payment deadline are no longer met, the suspension will be lifted — and the remaining time to pay (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) will resume. If the suspension exceeds two months, the coordinator may request the granting authority to confirm if the suspension will continue. If the payment deadline has been suspended due to the non-compliance of the report and the revised report is not submitted (or was submitted but is also rejected), the granting authority may also terminate the grant or the participation of the coordinator (see Article 32). ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION 30.1 Conditions The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend payments, in whole or in part for one or more beneficiaries, if: (a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or 56 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant. If payments are suspended for one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will make partial payment(s) for the part(s) not suspended. If suspension concerns the final payment, the payment (or recovery) of the remaining amount after suspension is lifted will be considered to be the payment that closes the action. 30.2 Procedure Before suspending payments, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to suspend payments and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. At the end of the suspension procedure, the granting authority will also inform the coordinator. The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent. If the conditions for resuming payments are met, the suspension will be lifted. The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned (and the coordinator) and set the suspension end date. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid to the beneficiaries concerned. For interim payments, the periodic reports for all reporting periods except the last one (see Article 21) must not contain any financial statements from the beneficiary concerned (or its affiliated entities). The coordinator must include them in the next periodic report after the suspension is lifted or — if suspension is not lifted before the end of the action — in the last periodic report. ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION 31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension 31.1.1 Conditions and procedure The beneficiaries may request the suspension of the grant or any part of it, if exceptional circumstances — in particular force majeure (see Article 35) — make implementation impossible or excessively difficult. 57 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the date the suspension takes effect; this date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request and - the expected date of resumption. The suspension will take effect on the day specified in the amendment. Once circumstances allow for implementation to resume, the coordinator must immediately request another amendment of the Agreement to set the suspension end date, the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the amendment. This date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3). 31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension 31.2.1 Conditions The granting authority may suspend the grant or any part of it, if: (a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (c) other: (i) linked action issues: not applicable (ii) the action has lost its scientific or technological relevance, for EIC Accelerator actions: the action has lost its economic relevance, for challenge-based EIC Pathfinder actions and Horizon Europe Missions: the action has lost its relevance as part of the Portfolio for which it has been initially selected 31.2.2 Procedure 58 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Before suspending the grant, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator: - formally notifying the intention to suspend the grant and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification). Once the conditions for resuming implementation of the action are met, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator a lifting of suspension letter, in which it will set the suspension end date and invite the coordinator to request an amendment of the Agreement to set the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the lifting of suspension letter. This date may be before the date on which the letter is sent. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3). The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to suspension by the granting authority (see Article 33). Grant suspension does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant or a beneficiary (see Article 32) or reduce the grant (see Article 28). ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION 32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination 32.1.1 Conditions and procedure The beneficiaries may request the termination of the grant. The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the date the consortium ends work on the action (‘end of work date’) and - the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request. The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment. If no reasons are given or if the granting authority considers the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the grant terminated improperly. 32.1.2 Effects 59 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the open reporting period until termination). The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible. If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). Improper termination may lead to a grant reduction (see Article 28). After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. 32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination 32.2.1 Conditions and procedure The coordinator may request the termination of the participation of one or more beneficiaries, on request of the beneficiary concerned or on behalf of the other beneficiaries. The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the opinion of the beneficiary concerned (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing) - the date the beneficiary ends work on the action (‘end of work date’) - the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request. If the termination concerns the coordinator and is done without its agreement, the amendment request must be submitted by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the consortium). The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment. If no information is given or if the granting authority considers that the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the beneficiary to have been terminated improperly. 32.2.2 Effects The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit: (i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned (ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until 60 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) (iii) a second request for amendment (see Article 39) with other amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.). The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible. The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21). If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that: - the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that - the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator. If the second request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39). If the second request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32). Improper termination may lead to a reduction of the grant (see Article 31) or grant termination (see Article 32). After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. 32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination 32.3.1 Conditions The granting authority may terminate the grant or the participation of one or more beneficiaries, if: (a) one or more beneficiaries do not accede to the Agreement (see Article 40) (b) a change to the action or the legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation of a beneficiary is likely to substantially affect the implementation of the action or calls into 61 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 question the decision to award the grant (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour) (c) following termination of one or more beneficiaries, the necessary changes to the Agreement (and their impact on the action) would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants (d) implementation of the action has become impossible or the changes necessary for its continuation would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants (e) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is subject to bankruptcy proceedings or similar (including insolvency, winding-up, administration by a liquidator or court, arrangement with creditors, suspension of business activities, etc.) (f) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is in breach of social security or tax obligations (g) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has been found guilty of grave professional misconduct (h) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed fraud, corruption, or is involved in a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorism-related crimes (including terrorism financing), child labour or human trafficking (i) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) was created under a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or other legal obligations in the country of origin (or created another entity with this purpose) (j) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.) (k) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (extension of findings from other grants to this grant; see Article 25) (l) despite a specific request by the granting authority, a beneficiary does not request — through the coordinator — an amendment to the Agreement to end the participation of one of its affiliated entities or associated partners that is in one of the situations under points (d), (f), (e), (g), (h), (i) or (j) and to reallocate its tasks, or 62 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 (m) other: (i) linked action issues: not applicable (ii) the action has lost its scientific or technological relevance, for EIC Accelerator actions: the action has lost its economic relevance, for challenge-based EIC Pathfinder actions and Horizon Europe Missions: the action has lost its relevance as part of the Portfolio for which it has been initially selected 32.3.2 Procedure Before terminating the grant or participation of one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to terminate and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the termination and the date it will take effect (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. For beneficiary terminations, the granting authority will — at the end of the procedure — also inform the coordinator. The termination will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification; ‘termination date’). 32.3.3 Effects (a) for GA termination: The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the last open reporting period until termination). The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible. If the grant is terminated for breach of the obligation to submit reports, the coordinator may not submit any report after termination. If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). Termination does not affect the granting authority’s right to reduce the grant (see Article 28) or to impose administrative sanctions (see Article 34). The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to termination by the granting authority (see Article 33). 63 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. (b) for beneficiary termination: The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit: (i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned (ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) (iii) a request for amendment (see Article 39) with any amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.). The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible. The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21). If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that: - the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that - the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator. If the request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39). If the request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32). After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. 64 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES 33.1 Liability of the granting authority The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused to the beneficiaries or to third parties as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement, including for gross negligence. The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused by any of the beneficiaries or other participants involved in the action, as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement. 33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries The beneficiaries must compensate the granting authority for any damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement, provided that it was caused by gross negligence or wilful act. The liability does not extend to indirect or consequential losses or similar damage (such as loss of profit, loss of revenue or loss of contracts), provided such damage was not caused by wilful act or by a breach of confidentiality. ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES Nothing in this Agreement may be construed as preventing the adoption of administrative sanctions (i.e. exclusion from EU award procedures and/or financial penalties) or other public law measures, in addition or as an alternative to the contractual measures provided under this Agreement (see, for instance, Articles 135 to 145 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046 and Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation 2988/9521). SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE A party prevented by force majeure from fulfilling its obligations under the Agreement cannot be considered in breach of them. ‘Force majeure’ means any situation or event that: - prevents either party from fulfilling their obligations under the Agreement, - was unforeseeable, exceptional situation and beyond the parties’ control, - was not due to error or negligence on their part (or on the part of other participants involved in the action), and - proves to be inevitable in spite of exercising all due diligence. 21 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 65 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 Any situation constituting force majeure must be formally notified to the other party without delay, stating the nature, likely duration and foreseeable effects. The parties must immediately take all the necessary steps to limit any damage due to force majeure and do their best to resume implementation of the action as soon as possible. CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES 36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management EU grants are managed fully electronically through the EU Funding & Tenders Portal (‘Portal’). All communications must be made electronically through the Portal, in accordance with the Portal Terms and Conditions and using the forms and templates provided there (except if explicitly instructed otherwise by the granting authority). Communications must be made in writing and clearly identify the grant agreement (project number and acronym). Communications must be made by persons authorised according to the Portal Terms and Conditions. For naming the authorised persons, each beneficiary must have designated — before the signature of this Agreement — a ‘legal entity appointed representative (LEAR)’. The role and tasks of the LEAR are stipulated in their appointment letter (see Portal Terms and Conditions). If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, instructions will be given on the Portal. 36.2 Date of communication The sending date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time of sending, as indicated by the time logs. The receiving date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time the communication is accessed, as indicated by the time logs. Formal notifications that have not been accessed within 10 days after sending, will be considered to have been accessed (see Portal Terms and Conditions). If a communication is exceptionally made on paper (by e-mail or postal service), general principles apply (i.e. date of sending/receipt). Formal notifications by registered post with proof of delivery will be considered to have been received either on the delivery date registered by the postal service or the deadline for collection at the post office. If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, the sending party cannot be considered in breach of its obligation to send a communication within a specified deadline. 36.3 Addresses for communication The Portal can be accessed via the Europa website. 66 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 The address for paper communications to the granting authority (if exceptionally allowed) is the official mailing address indicated on its website. For beneficiaries, it is the legal address specified in the Portal Participant Register. ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT The provisions in the Data Sheet take precedence over the rest of the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement. Annex 5 takes precedence over the Terms and Conditions; the Terms and Conditions take precedence over the Annexes other than Annex 5. Annex 2 takes precedence over Annex 1. ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES In accordance with Regulation No 1182/7122, periods expressed in days, months or years are calculated from the moment the triggering event occurs. The day during which that event occurs is not considered as falling within the period. ‘Days’ means calendar days, not working days. ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS 39.1 Conditions The Agreement may be amended, unless the amendment entails changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants. Amendments may be requested by any of the parties. 39.2 Procedure The party requesting an amendment must submit a request for amendment signed directly in the Portal Amendment tool. The coordinator submits and receives requests for amendment on behalf of the beneficiaries (see Annex 3). If a change of coordinator is requested without its agreement, the submission must be done by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the other beneficiaries). The request for amendment must include: - the reasons why - the appropriate supporting documents and 22 Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits (OJ L 124, 8/6/1971, p. 1). 67 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - for a change of coordinator without its agreement: the opinion of the coordinator (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing). The granting authority may request additional information. If the party receiving the request agrees, it must sign the amendment in the tool within 45 days of receiving notification (or any additional information the granting authority has requested). If it does not agree, it must formally notify its disagreement within the same deadline. The deadline may be extended, if necessary for the assessment of the request. If no notification is received within the deadline, the request is considered to have been rejected. An amendment enters into force on the day of the signature of the receiving party. An amendment takes effect on the date of entry into force or other date specified in the amendment. ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES 40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble The beneficiaries which are not coordinator must accede to the grant by signing the accession form (see Annex 3) directly in the Portal Grant Preparation tool, within 30 days after the entry into force of the Agreement (see Article 44). They will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of its entry into force (see Article 44). If a beneficiary does not accede to the grant within the above deadline, the coordinator must — within 30 days — request an amendment (see Article 39) to terminate the beneficiary and make any changes necessary to ensure proper implementation of the action. This does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant (see Article 32). 40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries In justified cases, the beneficiaries may request the addition of a new beneficiary. For this purpose, the coordinator must submit a request for amendment in accordance with Article 39. It must include an accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool. New beneficiaries will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of their accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3). Additions are also possible in mono-beneficiary grants. ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT In justified cases, the beneficiary of a mono-beneficiary grant may request the transfer of the grant to a new beneficiary, provided that this would not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants. The beneficiary must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with 68 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 - the reasons why - the accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool and - additional supporting documents (if required by the granting authority). The new beneficiary will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3). ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY The beneficiaries may not assign any of their claims for payment against the granting authority to any third party, except if expressly approved in writing by the granting authority on the basis of a reasoned, written request by the coordinator (on behalf of the beneficiary concerned). If the granting authority has not accepted the assignment or if the terms of it are not observed, the assignment will have no effect on it. In no circumstances will an assignment release the beneficiaries from their obligations towards the granting authority. ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES 43.1 Applicable law The Agreement is governed by the applicable EU law, supplemented if necessary by the law of Belgium. Special rules may apply for beneficiaries which are international organisations (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5). 43.2 Dispute settlement If a dispute concerns the interpretation, application or validity of the Agreement, the parties must bring action before the EU General Court — or, on appeal, the EU Court of Justice — under Article 272 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). For non-EU beneficiaries (if any), such disputes must be brought before the courts of Brussels, Belgium — unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements. For beneficiaries with arbitration as special dispute settlement forum (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5), the dispute will — in the absence of an amicable settlement — be settled in accordance with the Rules for Arbitration published on the Portal. If a dispute concerns administrative sanctions, offsetting or an enforceable decision under Article 299 TFEU (see Articles 22 and 34), the beneficiaries must bring action before the General Court — or, on appeal, the Court of Justice — under Article 263 TFEU. For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency (see Preamble), actions against 69 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 offsetting and enforceable decisions must be brought against the European Commission (not against the granting authority; see also Article 22). ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE The Agreement will enter into force on the day of signature by the granting authority or the coordinator, depending on which is later. SIGNATURES For the coordinator For the granting authority [--TGSMark#signature-902077691_75_210--] Santiago Cuesta López with ECAS id n002k7eg signed in the [--TGSMark#signature-service_75_210--] Signed by Natascia LAI with ECAS id lainata as an authorised Participant Portal on 20/09/2024 at 16:18:17 (transaction id SigId- representative on 20-09-2024 17:00:52 (transaction id SigId-68818- 68212-zGiFdjgxiS6BL4odHAu2yYzdUGXOkv0s2YZmdC8cqElMGzOROk jAWCqddnHzgAa9TXx307Tzhj5N0jkiX0BWOIeKCY217nmsrbjd1IFkI yXaQ2zNPlvTcMU6gzT1VxUGFXwoDw1payHJfa- DqgNbNWORMBhFivWhSijzebV02q0Y780- rS0vSrmBGYCcxSNg4ep5za-RSNFjMFadG5iaQKU2uWKMbK5NlwALUr rS0vSrmBGYCcxSNg4ep5za-JDqWL47XfSTMkf0tRYbSHXXJg7KLGVpj U99JY11GywYxPVbu29IwbvCfztxtGjUiyKNEQs8nqCWDW2E4SFqCEZi). VWAHOsqASlllrZ7RdaYys0P0oaRKzvElzzjPl5Ndh02r4RJFAm2cYNm) Timestamp by third party at 2024.09.20 17:00:55 CEST 2024.09.20 16:18:23 CEST 70  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 1 Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Description of the action (DoA) Part A Part B Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION (PART A) COVER PAGE Part A of the Description of the Action (DoA) must be completed directly on the Portal Grant Preparation screens. PROJECT Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Enter the info. Project number: 101178897 Project name: Recognizing European potential for hosting deep land primary CRM by combining new mineral models and advanced exploration and visualization techniques Project acronym: DEXPLORE Call: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Topic: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-01 Type of action: HORIZON-RIA Service: HADEA/B/03 Project starting date: fixed date: 1 October 2024 Project duration: 36 months TABLE OF CONTENTS Project summary ......................................................................................................................................................3 List of participants .................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of work packages .............................................................................................................................................5 Staff effort ............................................................................................................................................................. 16 List of deliverables ................................................................................................................................................17 List of milestones (outputs/outcomes) .................................................................................................................. 27 List of critical risks ............................................................................................................................................... 28 Project reviews ...................................................................................................................................................... 31 2 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 PROJECT SUMMARY Project summary Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Provide an overall description of your project (including context and overall objectives, planned activities and main achievements, and expected results and impacts (on target groups, change procedures, capacities, innovation etc)). This summary should give readers a clear idea of what your project is about. Use the project summary from your proposal. DEXPLORE seeks to revolutionize mineral exploration in Europe by developing innovative approaches to counter declining ore deposit discovery rates, focusing on deep-seated deposits critical for the economy's decarbonization. The project emphasizes engaging the general public and stakeholders, combining innovation at various levels, and utilizing cutting-edge tools and technologies. Targeting essential materials across extensive geological terrains, DEXPLORE proposes a holistic innovation package, integrating UAV-assisted in-field mineral detection, advanced Earth Observation methods, and novel deep-land geophysics techniques to reach at least 600 m depth. The initiative outlines the development of updated ore models, improving exploration technologies, and providing a visualization platform. This platform will integrate geological, remote sensing, and geophysical data to enhance access to information about EU potential in critical raw materials, while increasing public awareness. DEXPLORE also aims to strengthen cooperation with strategic partner countries, establishing a robust Advisory Board and fostering collaboration with other EU initiatives for joint activities and result sharing. In summary, DEXPLORE represents a collaborative effort to advance mineral exploration, contribute to sustainable sourcing of critical raw materials, and ensure EU's open strategic autonomy. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info. Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC 1 COO ISMC CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y ES 902077691 SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER 1.1 AE ICAMCYL FUNDACION ICAMCYL ES 911063674 2 BEN ICCS EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO EL 999654356 SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON 2.1 AE CogniSensus CogniSensus IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUCHIKI EL 877176918 ETAIREIA 3 BEN UNICA UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI IT 999841663 4 BEN CORE IC CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS AMKE EL 891712756 5 BEN TalTech TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL EE 999842536 6 BEN MNLT MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE EL 902617787 7 BEN Terradat TERRADAT GEOPHYSICS SL ES 879574855 8 BEN XCALIBUR XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL ES 885111518 9 BEN EGT EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS EE 907275533 3 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 PARTICIPANTS Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info. Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC 10 BEN ATALAYA ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL ES 915360192 MINING 11 BEN MINER SA MINERALES Y PRODUCTOS DERIVADOS SA ES 913325326 4 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 LIST OF WORK PACKAGES Work packages Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info. Work Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort Start End Deliverables Package No (Person- Month Month Months) WP1 Project coordination and management 1 - ISMC 41.00 1 36 D1.1 – Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) I D1.2 – Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) II D1.3 – IPR inventory of original and protectable results I D1.4 – IPR inventory of original and protectable results II WP2 Level 1: Development of mineral/ore models for 5 - TalTech 68.50 1 24 D2.1 – Systemic Estonian geochemical and the Estonian crystalline Precambrian basement petrophysical database D2.2 – Drill scanning database D2.3 – Early Estonian ore model at different scales D2.4 – Early Estonian ore model with comparative analysis WP3 Level 2: Remote Sensing for surface exploration 2 - ICCS 54.50 1 20 D3.1 – Remote field mineral detection Prototype D3.2 – Spectral library D3.3 – ML/DL based mineral exploration methods with remote sensing data D3.4 – ML/DL methods used by the field mineral detector WP4 Level 3: Geophysical techniques for deep land 7 - Terradat 95.10 1 22 D4.1 – UAV with gravimetry technology exploration WP5 Level 4: Visualization and interaction platform 4 - CORE IC 97.50 1 32 D5.1 – Advancement on the visualization and interaction platform 5 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Work packages Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info. Work Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort Start End Deliverables Package No (Person- Month Month Months) D5.2 – 3D Geological Modeling and Extended Reality tools WP6 Final in-field technology validation 9 - EGT 133.20 23 36 D6.1 – Final mineral remote sensing exploration maps D6.2 – UAV exploration with gravimeter sensor flights D6.3 – Passive seismic survey D6.4 – Estonian ore models and Resource assessment WP7 LCA & Environmental Assessment 6 - MNLT 53.50 5 36 D7.1 – Life Cycle, Life Cycle Cost and Social Life Cycle Assessments WP8 Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and 1 - ISMC 99.00 1 36 D8.1 – DEC Plan and execution I Clustering D8.2 – DEC Plan and execution II D8.3 – DEC Plan and execution III D8.4 – Joint clustering activity plan D8.5 – Joint clustering activity report D8.6 – Techno-economic analysis and Business Plan D8.7 – Report on the International workshop and Roadmap of common actions 6 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Work package WP1 – Project coordination and management Work Package Number WP1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Work Package Name Project coordination and management Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives a) To meet general objectives and individual WPs’ objectives by comparing estimated baseline against actual performance. b) To control costs expenditure within authorized budgets for each period by Task/WP. c) To manage risks identified in Table "List of critical risks" and monitor for new potential risks. d) To manage legal and contractual aspects and both internal and external communication to ensure optimal information flow among key stakeholders. Description Task 1.1: Definition of consortium operating procedures, quality and equity assurance (M1-M36); Leader: ISMC; Participants: All. ISMC as project coordinator will define the consortium operating procedures to ensure smooth project management to achieve the objectives. This includes procedures for financial reporting, presentation standards for deliverables and EC reports, measures to ensure timely reporting, payment procedures and plan, work packages calendar, consortium decision making process, ethical aspects follow-up, among others. Task 1.2: Monitoring of work advancement and financial management (M1-M36); Leader: ISMC; Participants: All. ISMC will regularly monitor progression of work activities ensuring that both the general project objectives and the individual work package objectives are met by comparing the estimated baseline against actual performance. The Milestones table will be used to check the broad status of the project via the defined means of verification, while the Gantt will be used for an in-depth assessment of project progress (WP and task-levels) considering deliverables and milestones as key indicators of achievement of project results. Task 1.3: Risk, IPR and data management. (M1-M36) Leader: ISMC; Participants: ICAMCyL, MNLT, All. ISMC will set up a technical/commercial/financial risk watch during the project execution. Any deviation from planned activities will be reported and decisions will be made to implement contingency plan(s) and evaluate potential impacts on future tasks. Moreover, during the regular meetings we will confirm if project assumptions are still valid to update project risk assessment if necessary. The Data Management Plan (DMP) will outline the conditions for publication, data preservation and adherence to FAIR and ‘as open as possible, as closed as necessary’ principles. The DMP will provide distinct guidelines for open access data and sensitive/confidential information. An IPR inventory of original and protectable results will be created and updated, aiming to guarantee that dissemination activities and middle/long-term commercial exploitation are consistent with the protection of confidential information and assets. Task 1.4: Communication within the consortium and with EC (M1-M36); Leader: ISMC; Participants: All. Regular meetings (alternating F2F and online every 6 months) and appropriate channels of communication (emails, presentations, shared files) will be used to ensure optimal information flow among partners, always trying to lower the carbon footprint of the project. The project online workspace will facilitate collaborative work, minimizing security breaches and facilitating GDPR compliance. ISMC will be the contact with the EC Project Officer, ensuring timely submission of the deliverables, periodic reports, financial statements, and official documents. For this purpose, Activity Reports, including Expenditure information from all Consortium partners will be generated every 6 months. ISMC will also manage the legal and contractual issues (like GA amendments) and ensure all administrative aspects are undertaken and delivered according to EC requirements. Task 1.5: Gender dimension and gender balance supervision (M1-M36); Leader: ISMC; Participants: All. A common Equality Policy will be approved at the kick-off meeting which will be based on the Athena Swan Principles. Clear measures to support work-life balance and empower female team members to lead teams and take responsibility will be agreed and apply to the project duration (e.g. flexible, home-working, childcare positive). This policy will be supervised and subject to a formal review every two steering committees/executive board meetings. 7 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Work package WP2 – Level 1: Development of mineral/ore models for the Estonian crystalline Precambrian basement Work Package Number WP2 Lead Beneficiary 5 - TalTech Work Package Name Level 1: Development of mineral/ore models for the Estonian crystalline Precambrian basement Start Month 1 End Month 24 Objectives a) Increase the knowledge about the occurrence of primary deep-seated CRM/SRM by identifying anomalies and targeting promising mineralization by using advanced laboratory methods and data analytics to examine large, multi- element datasets. b) Define mineral systems for DEXPLORE targeted minerals and geological settings. c) Compare the primary CRM/SRM potential of the Estonian Precambrian basement with the Swedish and Finnish basements to increase the knowledge about the occurrence of deep CRM/SRM in crystalline rocks, well extended in Europe. Description Task 2.1: Integration of (pre)existing geological information (M1- M12); Leader: GSE; Participants: TalTech. In Estonia, GSE with the support of TalTech, will initially compile and assess the current knowledge and available materials for petrology investigations in NE Estonia. Also, the TalTech will advance on the comparison of geochemical and petrophysics data coming from metamorphic formations in Sweden and Finland with the aim for properly map the potential of the primary targeted CRM in this promising area. Task 2.2: Geochemical analysis (M1 - M12); Leader: TalTech; Participants: GSE, ATM, MINERSA. In Estonia, systematic mineral characterization and quantification studies (XRF, XRD, SEM-EDS/EPMA, ICPMS if needed) will be carried out on existing samples from Alutaguse gneisses after an inventory (>100 samples); and available drill cores profiles at TalTech and GSE will be scanned by portable XRF spectrometers (or also hyperspectral analyses) for the targeted elements. The final aim will be to provide a systematic dataset, with proper resolution for ore modeling. In Spain, new geochemical and petrophysical data will be collected - if needed - points of the calibration pilot areas (WP4). Task 2.3: XRF, infrared and magnetic susceptibility multiscanning of drill cores (M1 - M18); Leader: GSE; Participants: TalTech, ATM, MINERSA. At least 50 existing drill cores from relevant project sites in Eastern Estonia will be analyzed by Geotek core scanning instrument. The received data will be validated, systematized and stored in the database (D2.2). Deep drills planned before DEXPLORE in ATM and MINERSA sites will provide cores to be analyzed, and if needed, other relevant drill cores of the Estonian basement. The obtained massive geochemical, mineralogical, and magnetic data will be used for analysing potential ore systems (WP6). Task 2.4: Petrophysical analysis (M3 - M12); Leader: TerraDat; Participants: GSE. The petrophysical characterization will include seismic velocity, electrical chargeability and resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, electromagnetic conductivity, and density. The analysis will be carried out on existing and new core samples from boreholes and outcrops. The final aim is the creation of a petrophysical database for the optimization of geophysical surveys and to construct accurate mining models. Task 2.5: Integrated mineral models for targeted settings/minerals (M8 – M24); Leader: TalTech; Participants: GSE. In Estonia, this task is looking for the implementation of acquired data to existing models and development of ore models for new areas. In particular, TalTech team will develop ore models for the Estonian crystalline basement, running also a comparative study to Bergslagen complex of Sweden. Moreover, TalTech will run LA-ICP-MS analyses in collaboration with Trinity College. The results of these analysis will be used by TalTech to define petrogenetic and mineral enrichment stages. This method will provide new information for ore understanding and resource distribution, and will be applied to geothermobarometer minerals, such as garnets. Early ore models will be built during the 1st two years of DEXPLORE considering existing data and new geochemical and petrophysical databases (T2.1, T2.2), to also assess potential gaps. After counting on the pilot results (WP6), the models will be properly updated (T6.2). In Spain, since ATM and MINERSA - under exploitation stage - already count on proved mineral models, there is not expected a significant workload. 8 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Work package WP3 – Level 2: Remote Sensing for surface exploration Work Package Number WP3 Lead Beneficiary 2 - ICCS Work Package Name Level 2: Remote Sensing for surface exploration Start Month 1 End Month 20 Objectives a) Establish an advanced spectral analysis approach for mapping and analysis of minerals from remote sensing data through direct field sample identification. b) Develop a novel prototype based on Raman and Laser Induced Breakdown spectroscopy towards the remote detection of the targeted minerals. c) Implement ML/DL methods for rapid and accurate mineral discovery and interpretation. d) Enable combination of spectroscopy data with satellite hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data towards upscaling surface mineral exploration mapping to a wider extent. Description Task 3.1: Mineral exploration with remote sensing data - Copernicus (M1-M18); Leader: ICCS. Development of remote sensing-based approaches for regional and local mineral exploration with high spatial resolution multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing data (e.g. Sentinel-2, PRISMA, EnMAP). Spectral analysis approaches will be employed to identify spectrally homogeneous regions and identify target CRM/SRM by sensor-related and knowledge-based fitting approaches. The development and validation of results will be based on ground spectra recorded in the VNIR–SWIR range (400–2500 nm) of the detected CRM in the final pilot zone (from WP2). Task 3.2: Field mineral detection prototype and lab validation (M1 – M18); Leader: UNICA; Participants: ICCS. Development of a Remote Raman+LIBS+Fluorescence prototype designed to adjust excitation energy, ensuring a Raman signal with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), minimal power consumption, and reduced risk of damaging the target with high-energy pulses. The design will prioritize weight and dimensions, making it compatible for drones’ integration enabling remote and in-situ applications. Operating optimally at a working distance of 3 to 5 meters from the samples, the prototype will function under daylight conditions with acquisition times of a few seconds. This prototype will be demonstrated for the detection of DEXPLORE targeted minerals. Several parameters will be tested and optimized (i.e., Excitation Source; Optical Setup; Detector as described in Methodology). Task 3.3: Hyperspectral signatures of unknown materials (M13-M18); Leader: ICCS; Participants: CogniSensus. The objective is to create a pipeline that can accurately create and validate the hyperspectral signatures of both known and unknown materials with various purity compositions. Composites and specific ores based on the use cases. This will be achieved by utilizing in-situ measurements obtained from a hyperspectral station that operates within the wavelength range of 400nm to 5000nm. The development of multi-modal deep learning models will be based on the distinctive physical and chemical properties of minerals under specific conditions, while these models will be used to identify mineral signatures by utilizing data from both the hyperspectral station and the Raman+LIBS+Fluorescence prototype (T3.2). Finally, an in-situ hyperspectral library based on the purity of materials and associated signatures will be developed. Task 3.4: Data interpretation and resource assessment (M15 – M20); Leader: ICCS; Participants: UNICA. Data collected with remote sensing sensors will be utilized for creating a robust spectral library with reference spectral signatures from target minerals. This library will be used as a reference for identifying the spectra collected at the testing sites. The in-situ hyperspectral library (T3.3) will be further enriched and fine-tuned allowing the efficient consolidation of novel data provided by remote data sensors. Lightweight ML/DL methods will be also developed for rapid and accurate identification and quantification of mineral samples using the prototype (T3.2). These methods will require minimum computational resources to be able to execute as a component of the prototype or online and provide accurate and real- time results. Work package WP4 – Level 3: Geophysical techniques for deep land exploration Work Package Number WP4 Lead Beneficiary 7 - Terradat 9 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Work Package Name Level 3: Geophysical techniques for deep land exploration Start Month 1 End Month 22 Objectives a) Develop new efficient and non-invasive geophysical technologies for deep-seated mineral exploration including metallic and non-metallic deposits. b) Initial calibration of the developed geophysical methods to check that the set KPIs are reached. Description Task 4.1: Optimization of unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry (M1 – M18). Leader: Xcalibur. Xcalibur will work on the optimization of an advanced system based on UAV with gravimetry technology for exploration of deep land CRM/SRM deposits. The aim is to develop a UAV scalar gravity system capable of measuring 1mGal at wavelength of 500m. The main challenges to be faced, in order to achieve the desired resolution, include (1) coupling the sensor and the UAV, considering the lever-arm effect of the relative positioning of the GNSS and the IMU, (2) flying: small line spacing at low speeds, and (3) data processing: filtering, down-sampling IMU raw data considering coning and sculling, and adapting a direct approach (from i-frame to n-frame) or/and an indirect-approach (using kalman filters to fuse IMU and GNSS data). Developing the navigation system and obtaining permits to fly UAVs BVLOS (beyond the visual line of sight) will also be a challenge. Xcalibur will also oversee data processing, analysis, navigation, surveying, guidance, and stabilization. Task 4.2: Land-based technique – innovative seismic method (M1 – M12); Leader: TerraDat. TerraDat will advance on its innovative seismic survey methodology based on seismic nodes and seismic passive acquisitions. For this purpose, specific software will be used to model critical aspects related with the acquisition and processing of the passive surveys in several geological contexts: a) the optimization of the geometry of the seismic nodes to reach the target depth, with enough resolution to identify the mineralization and/or geological structures that generate it. In this case different sensor spacings will be analyzed to evaluate the minimum resolution to characterize the mineralization and geological features. The maximum length of the seismic line, critical aspect to reach the target depth in each work area (at least up to 700m), will also be analyzed. b) the optimization of the seismic recording time necessary to obtain reliable results. One of the key factors that influence the quality of passive seismic surveys is evaluating the optimal recording time. This time depends on several factors, such as the type of seismic noise in each area, or the investigation depth. In this case, it is proposed to evaluate seismic acquisitions during 5 to 20 days, to identify the optimal time window necessary to obtain high-resolution seismic models of the terrain. c) data processing and inversion is another critical aspect that influences the detection capacity of the method. TerraDat will test various types of processing and inversion parameters to obtain reliable terrain models. Task 4.3: Calibration pilots (M12 – M22); Participants: Xcalibur, TerraDat, ATM, MINERSA. The calibration pilots correspond to two small and significant mining areas (ca. 10-20 km2) to obtain reliable geophysical data up at least 600 m depth and comprising metallic and non-metallic minerals. Two areas have been selected in Spain with specific mineralization features allowing for calibrating the geophysical techs developed in 4.1 and 4.2 and guarantee the achievement of the set KPIs: dissemination of Cu (SRM), Ni (SRM), and Zn (Zn) at ATM mine, and mineralization along planar structures – Fluorite at MINERSA mine. The selected mines count on well-structured geochemical, petrophysical, core drilling information, and a developed ore model, being the perfect scenario for running initial validation tests. In both pilots TerraDat (M12 – M22) and Xcalibur (M19 – M22) aim to run surveys focused on the identification of mineralization while evaluating main geological units and structures. The surveys will include a seismic line and a UAV gravity flight, where several aspects related with the acquisition and processing will be evaluated for optimizing the seismic exploration. Results will be compared with the geological and geophysical available data. Work package WP5 – Level 4: Visualization and interaction platform Work Package Number WP5 Lead Beneficiary 4 - CORE IC Work Package Name Level 4: Visualization and interaction platform Start Month 1 End Month 32 10 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Objectives a) To integrate and manage large-scale, diverse datasets efficiently, ensuring real-time data processing. b) To develop an intuitive and interactive user interface, utilizing modern web technologies for enhanced data visualization and user engagement. c) Integrate 3D visualization capabilities to support the immersive experience of the exploration activities. Description Task 5.1: Analysis of datasets and platform specifications (M1 – M8); Task leader: CORE; Participants: UNICA, ICCS, TalTech, GSE, Xcalibur, TerraDat. This task entails a thorough evaluation of available datasets relevant to the project, focusing on understanding their format, scale, and applicability. It also includes determining technical specifications for the software platform to ensure compatibility with diverse data types and sources. Essential aspects like data ingestion protocols, storage solutions, and security measures will be outlined. This phase is critical in setting a foundational framework for the platform, with an emphasis on scalability, interoperability, and performance criteria. Task 5.2: Development of the DEXPLORE platform (M9 – M24); Task leader: CORE; Participants: ICCS. In this task, the DEXPLORE platform will be developed, incorporating advanced data handling and processing capabilities. The platform will utilize data transformed into suitable formats like JSON, which will be transmitted to a middleware supporting real-time or near real-time data pipelines. A cloud-based infrastructure will be established, featuring a data warehouse designed around Big Data principles, using cutting-edge tools like NoSQL databases (MongoDB, Cassandra, Influx DB). CORE's role will be to design and implement a robust and secure infrastructure for on-demand data distribution, utilizing established industry tools and frameworks (HTTP/S, RESTful, SOAP). The platform will facilitate seamless integration of large data volumes from various devices and components, employing adapters and interfaces compatible with distributed ledger technology, without compromising security. This includes developing clients and adapters for Kafka, deployable libraries for gateway nodes, etc., ensuring secure and efficient data flow from source to blockchain. Task 5.3: Development of the smart visualization dashboard and UI (M9 – M24); Task leader: CORE; Participants: ICCS. For this task, the focus will be on creating a front-end that leverages modern web technologies like HTML5, TypeScript, and Material UI, aiming for an intuitive, responsive, and visually appealing user interface. Server-side rendering with React.js will be employed for faster loading times, coupled with Redux for advanced state management. This will enable efficient handling of complex user interfaces and scalability. Rest API technology, integrated with Axios and JWT authentication, will ensure robust and safe data exchange, enhancing user experience. To facilitate rapid prototyping and parallel development of the front-end while the back end is under construction, tools like MSW will be used. The web app will also incorporate advanced visualization techniques, like 3D accelerated maps using MapboxGL, and graphs and charts with ChartJS and Plotly. These features will provide an interactive interface for data exploration and analysis. The integration of these technologies ensures that the platform is not only powerful in processing and displaying data but also user-friendly and accessible, catering to diverse user needs and preferences. This approach will streamline the user's interaction with complex data, making it easier to derive insights and make informed decisions. Task 5.4: 3D Geological Modeling (M8 – M32); Task leader: Xcalibur. Participants: TerraDat. The objective of the integration of 3D Geological Modeling within the Visualization and Interaction Platform is to create a comprehensive model for deep land deposits as part of the exploration strategy of primary CRM of our DEXPLORE project. This 3D model will serve as a foundational element, providing a detailed representation of subsurface features, mineralogy, and critical raw material distribution. The initial step involves collecting and compiling existing geological data, including borehole logs, geophysical surveys, and relevant maps from WP2. Data pre- processing follows, ensuring consistency and accuracy, while addressing any gaps or inconsistencies. A conceptual model is then developed based on geological theories and existing knowledge, defining geological units, structures, and potential mineralization zones. The actual 3D modeling employs specialized software, integrating borehole data, cross-sections, and geophysical information. Mineral resource estimation is conducted, considering factors like grade distribution and tonnage. Model validation against independent data sets and field observations is performed, and any discrepancies are addressed. The model is then integrated into the Visualization and Interaction Platform, ensuring compatibility and seamless interaction with other project components. Detailed documentation, including methodology and assumptions, is provided, accompanied by comprehensive reports outlining results and interpretations. Quality assurance and control processes are implemented to validate the accuracy and reliability of the 3D geological model. Task 5.5: Extended Reality tools (M12 - M32); Leader: ICCS; Participants: CORE. Development of an Extended Reality (VR or AR/MR) application for the visualization of the 3D geological models to 11 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 support the immersive experience of the exploration activities. Coupling XR with models of the whole mineral systems related to critical raw materials, 3D geological models, as well as other relevant geophysical data or data received from the UAV explorations, enabling end-users to improve their awareness of the whole formation. When needed, object recognition algorithms will improve the interaction and positioning of the 3D content. Head Mounted devices will be exploited for the deployment of the application, based on the needs of the end-users and the curation of the available immersive content (e.g. 3D geological models or other geophysical data). All content provided by tasks 5.4 and WP4 will be optimized to support XR functionalities. Work package WP6 – Final in-field technology validation Work Package Number WP6 Lead Beneficiary 9 - EGT Work Package Name Final in-field technology validation Start Month 23 End Month 36 Objectives a) DEXPLORE final technology validation in-field to reach TRL5. b) Testing of characterization capabilities making use of all earlier research efforts for combined demonstration purposes. c) Ensuring local stakeholders' validation and social license to operate Description Task 6.1: Data collection during the final in-field pilot across the Estonian Precambrian crystalline basement (M19 – M29); Leader: GSE; Participants: TalTech (J. Solano, S.Graul, T. Hand), UNICA, ICCS, Terradat, Xcalibur. - Sub-task 6.1.1 Remote sensing analysis (M19 – M23). Participants: UNICA, ICCS: The location of the detected mineral occurrences using the Field mineral detection prototype (T3.2) will be used as reference data for the spectral analysis of hyperspectral and multispectral (spaceborne or airborne) remote sensing data. For this in-field validation of the mineral detection prototype, ICCS will provide the UAV for the conduction of targeted data collection surveys. To do so, the UAV will be selected according to the prototype dimensions and weight. This task includes the data pre-processing of the raw remote sensing data to enhance their quality and remove any noise or artifacts. This may involve radiometric and geometric corrections, atmospheric correction, and spectral calibration to ensure accurate interpretation of the Raman features. - Sub-task 6.1.2 Geophysical surveys (M24 – M29). Participants: Xcalibur, TerraDat: After getting permission from local authorities and counting on the pre-processing remote sensing results, airborne and ground-based geophysical data acquisition will be planned and conducted. Initially, Xcalibur will oversee UAV with scalar gravity technology, providing high-resolution and high-quality gravity solutions for mapping and target detection in Eastern Europe at least up to 600 m depth (Estonia) (M24-25). The land surveys will follow being focused on targets defined by the airborne and in areas with exploration interest (M27-28) expecting to reach even deeper details. The survey will include a seismic line, where several acquisition parameters will be tested, to define accurately the mineral and geological characteristics. The subsequent processing, inversion and data interpretation will be based on petrophysical and geological preliminary info (WP2). It is expected that the seismic model obtained provides a crucial evaluation about the geological units and structures, where the mineralization is developed. Task 6.2: Final Estonian mineral model - Data interpretation and resource assessment (M25 – M36). Leader: GSE; Participants: TalTech (J. Solano, S.Graul, T. Hand), UNICA, ICCS, Terradat, Xcalibur. After running T6.1, the partners will work together on the integration of geophysical, petrophysical and mineral information to create an advanced geological and mineral model for the Estonian Precambrian Basement, including the mineralization, and the most important geological structures and units that could have given rise to the mineralization. In detail, Raman features within the remote sensing data will be extracted using the specialized algorithms designed in T3.3 to identify spectral signatures characteristic of different minerals or geological materials. These features may include peak wavelengths, intensity ratios, and spectral shape parameters associated with Raman spectrum of defined minerals. Later extracted Raman features are analyzed to interpret the composition, distribution, and abundance of minerals within the study area. This involves comparing the spectral signatures observed in the remote sensing data with reference libraries (developed in WP3) containing known Raman spectra of minerals. ML and pattern recognition techniques may be employed to classify and map different mineralogical units based on their Raman features. The interpreted results of remote sensing data are validated against ground truth data and geological knowledge to assess their 12 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 accuracy and reliability. Calibration exercises may be conducted to refine spectral libraries and improve the performance of classification algorithms. On the other hand, the interpretation and resource assessment of data collected by the UAV equipped with a gravimeter sensor for detecting anomaly concentrations of CRM will involve several key steps. Firstly, processing to eliminate noise, and enhancing signals related to subsurface density variations. The identification of density anomalies in the processed data is crucial for indicating potential mineral deposits, including copper (Cu), magnetite for iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and molybdenum (Mo). The next step will involve integrating gravimetric data with existing geological maps and information (WP2), enabling a correlation between density anomalies, and known geological features. Particularly, the correlation between high lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) concentrations and the presence of graphitic gneisses is explored. Cross-verification with data from other geophysical methods, such as the TerraDat seismic passive method as well as the geophysical pre-exiting information coming from WP2 (e.g. magnetic or electromagnetic surveys), will be employed to refine interpretations and enhance the accuracy of mineral mapping. Additionally, recent public investigations into carbon (C) concentrations are taken into consideration. The findings from these investigations will be integrated into the analysis to assess how carbon concentrations correlate with or influence the identified density anomalies and mineralization patterns. This comprehensive approach will help to build a more nuanced understanding of the geological context and potential mineral resources. In addition, resource estimation will be conducted, considering factors such as depth, volume, and grade of the mineral deposits. Gravimetric data is crucial in estimating the size and potential economic viability of the mineral resources. Environmental considerations are also paramount, evaluating the potential impact of mining activities in the identified areas, with specific attention to recent investigations into carbon concentrations and other environmental concerns. Task 6.3: XR platform validation and Social License to Operate: Educational/acceptability activities involving general public. (M24 - M36); Task leader: ICCS; Participants: CORE; ISMC, ICAMCYL, TalTech, GSE, ATM, MINERSA. The current task includes the design, development and use of an Augmented Reality (AR) application to improve the awareness of the general public towards exploration activities and educate them through immersive visualizations of the 3D geological models. Content prepared and optimized in T5.1 and 5.2, respectively, will be supported by gamification and educational functionalities, aiming to support engagement and improve the self-efficacy of the immersed audience. Immersive campaigns will be aiming at: i) assessing the knowledge and understanding of the importance of responsibly sourced supply of raw materials, ii) showcasing 3D models and other data, iii) fostering awareness and engagement towards the successful transition to a climate-neutral and digitized economy and society. To ensure social participation and engagement, the AR tool will be part of the open days in pilot areas and will also assess the general public understanding to increase awareness using inputs from T7.3. To secure the success of the platform validation. MINERSA, ATM, and TalTech as leader of each 3 pilot (6.1.1; 6.1.2; 6.2 respectively) will engage with community groups and general public located around the pilot areas. This flow of information to relevant stakeholders, regulatory authorities, and the public, will increase transparency and trust, addressing environmental and social considerations in the decision- making process surrounding potential mining activities. Task 6.4: Finetuning of the technology (M30 – M36); Participants: UNICA, ICCS, Xcalibur, TerraDat, CORE. Based on the final test results and using data from WP7 and WP8 the technical partners will run the last tech optimization. Work package WP7 – LCA & Environmental Assessment Work Package Number WP7 Lead Beneficiary 6 - MNLT Work Package Name LCA & Environmental Assessment Start Month 5 End Month 36 Objectives a) Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of the different technologies and their parameters. Ensure the complete, timely, and secure process for data sharing with the involvement of all relevant consortium partners. b) Define and structure scenarios. Develop relevant and aligned scenarios for the upscaled technology for LCA-LCC- SLCA. c) Benchmark LCA of conventional technologies. Perform a baseline LCA for the existing current technology and value chain based on recent literature and on project partners’ input. d) Value chain assessment and LCA integration. Perform a flowsheet simulation with the project upscaled technology and integrate LCA indices for direct environmental monitoring of operating the technology, with provisional suggestions on improvement of the environmental performance. 13 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Description Task 7.1: Data compilation and scenarios (M5 - 36); Leader: MNLT; Participants: UNICA, ICCS, CORE, TalTech, GSE, Xcalibur, TerraDat. This task goal is the data compilation for the execution of the respective activities on LCA-LCC-SLCA (WP7) -TEA (WP8) sustainability assessment overall. Since data sharing and reliability is of high importance for the successful implementation of this WP, a structured methodology and activities will take place for the uniform data collection from the technological WPs (WP2 to WP6) and respective partners and for defining scenarios that will be the basis for the Sustainability assessment of the upscaled technology for exploration of deep land deposits. MNLT will organize online workshops in critical parts of the project duration to a) set the frame and familiarize the partners with the main principles of this WP objectives, and b) to structure the data compilation process from the involved partners as an ongoing activity. Task 7.2: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost (M12 – M36); Leader: MNLT; Participants: UNICA, ICCS, CORE, TalTech, GSE, Xcalibur, TerraDat. The main part of this task is focused on LCA, LCC of the upscaled technology from the lab till the TRL5 pilot scale phase. MNLT will perform several LCAs and LCCs to incorporate the environmental results in the post-project upscaling technology process. A benchmark LCA of the conventional technologies will be performed as a baseline LCA for the existing current technology and value chain for comparison purposes. Task 7.3: Social Life Cycle Assessment (M12 – M36); Leader: MNLT; Participants: UNICA, ICCS, CORE, TalTech, GSE, Xcalibur, TerraDat. MNLT will assess the technology's social and sociological aspects of DEXPLORE technology, their actual and potential positive and negative impacts along the life cycle (time horizon for 5,25 and 30 years). This looks at the exploration, extraction and processing of raw materials, manufacturing, distribution, use, reuse, maintenance, recycling, and final disposal. It will make use of generic and site-specific data generated through the project but also based on literature on societal trends and status. Societal impact in several indices will be examined, complementing the environmental LCA and LCC. In particular, the societal impact of stronger CRM supply chains and the associated increase in EU resources and resource-autonomy will be showcased. Work package WP8 – Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and Clustering Work Package Number WP8 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Work Package Name Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and Clustering Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives a) Design and execute our communication and dissemination plan and activities. b) Develop a comprehensive exploitation strategy, including techno-economic analysis and business case. c) Attract stakeholders to activate synergies, cocreate joint initiatives and ensure multi-level local to international outreach. d) Clustering activities with selected relevant projects. e) Ensure collaboration of Advisory Board, industrial platforms and public authorities towards mirroring and replication actions in regions within and outside Europe Description Task 8.1: Dissemination and communication plan, activities and events (M1 – M36); Leader: ISMC; Participants: all. A detailed Dissemination and Communication Plan will be produced at M4 in collaboration with all the consortium, outlining audiences, key messages, communication channels and procedures. Communication Activities will include a) project logo and templates for presentations and reporting; b) development and launching of the project website (M4); c) social media and project newsletter once a year, d) professional videos (M6 – summary, M35 – key results), e) leaflets and posters. All the partners will contribute to the updating of the website and publicizing news related to the project. Project partners will organize communication activities within the project events and will ensure that the project is present at external exhibitions, conferences, or events. Dissemination Activities will bring results to the scientific community as well as to relevant policymakers and standardization bodies. On a scientific level, dissemination activities 14 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 will pay particular attention to publication in international scientific, peer-reviewed high impact journals and open access repositories. Task 8.2: Exploitation planning and Technoeconomic analysis (TEA) (M1 - M36); Leader: MNLT; Participants: ISMC, ICAMCyL, UNICA, CORE, ICCS, Xcalibur, TerraDat. Considering that the TRL at the end of the project is 5, a preliminary exploitation strategy will be developed by MNLT and integrated/synchronized with the D&C Plan by ISMC (M4), and then will evolve through the project up to M34. Technoeconomic analyses will delve into the competitiveness of the solutions using the results from the LCC (WP7), specifications from the technical WPs (WP2-WP5), and the technology validation and testing (WP6). A desk-based market analysis (including target clients) will be done by MNLT with the project's WP leaders and industrial partners, feeding with data an initial business plan focused on the most valuable Key Exploitable Results (Sect. 2) and including the evaluation of the CAPEX/OPEX (as defined by LCC), as well as cost considerations for recycling. Such a business plan will comprise a SWOT analysis, Business Model Canvas, and a Financial Plan. The payback period and ROI will be calculated to determine financial sustainability. In this task ICAMCyL with the collaboration of ISMC will organise clustering activities aimed at developing links with other relevant projects operating under HE, EIT Raw Materials, and other initiatives. The objective is to foster alliances among organisations and stakeholders to support the exploitation of project results and exchange knowledge on common issues and solutions. The Clustering activities will include: - Organization of 3 international clustering events that will bring together relevant projects, initiatives and organizations to broaden the reach of the project. Two events will take place in partners’ regions, to be selected by the Advisory Board, a third event will take place during in Brussels, towards the end of the project. - Elaboration and implementation of a joint clustering activity plan that will promote synergies and common actions in the following areas: policies, regulations, standards, and data dissemination. The plan will provide the basis for activities beyond the lifetime of the project. Other joint clustering activities will include: development of joint scientific communications, recommendations supporting the development of future policy around mining exploration, and joint participation in scientific conferences and business tradeshows. All partners and coordinators of other projects will be invited to contribute to the sessions organized together with the DEXPLORE project. The clustering events and the clustering plan will take into consideration the results and recommendations outlined in the exploitation plan of T8.2, contributing to the actual implementation of the market uptake and exploitation activities of this task. The clustering activities will also align to the work and recommendations of the Advisory board (T8.4) Task 8.4: International integration and multi–stakeholder engagement – Advisory Board (M6 - M36); Leader: ICAMCyL; Participants: ISMC, GSE, TalTech. This task will bring consortium partners together with relevant EU and non-EU regional, national and international stakeholders following the guidance from the Advisory Board (AB) preferentially from countries signing strategic partnerships on raw materials with the EU. Interaction and mutual reinforcement will be ensured with the S3P-Industry platform “Mining Industry” and EIT-RM, where some project partners are active members. Events and diverse engagement actions will aim the establishment of strong links between these actors, not only at the industrial and scientific level, but also institutionally and between authorities for guaranteeing the scalability and adoption of the project results. Further, a mirroring strategy will be applied to identify regions and industrial players interested in the KERs and/or in replicating best practices from the project case-studies, potentially aligning the Smart Specialization Strategies of the participant regions and fostering transnational and interregional innovation and business opportunities. An International Workshop is planned (ICAMCyL, ISMC), involving the AB, inviting key representatives from the relevant industry actors and stakeholders, ensuring participation of companies, policy makers and end users across and beyond the EU. Following this workshop, a series of recommendations and findings will be summarized and drafted with the involvement and guidance of the AB. The needs and challenges of these actors will be carefully analyzed in order to establish a roadmap of common actions, facilitating common inter-regional research, innovation and business activities lasting over time. This task will facilitate the work of the AB, including setting up meetings and an online workspace. Task 8.5: Training and knowledge-transfer program (M18 – M36); Leader: TalTech; Participants: all. To facilitate the further integration of DEXPLORE solutions and technology across the EU and partner countries, a suite of outreach, knowledge-transfer and e-learning activities will be employed. The list of methods includes short training videos, webinars, guidelines, and summary documents to be combined in a MOOC to support outreach, remote learning and capacity building based on the results. The results from previous Tasks will help to identify specific training needs of key stakeholders. 15 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 STAFF EFFORT Staff effort per participant Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info. Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 WP7 WP8 Total Person-Months 1 - ISMC 29.00 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 6.00 0.50 28.00 65.50 1.1 - ICAMCYL 1.00 6.00 25.00 32.00 2 - ICCS 1.00 24.00 15.00 15.00 3.00 1.00 59.00 2.1 - CogniSensus 1.00 10.00 11.00 3 - UNICA 1.00 20.00 1.00 10.00 2.00 4.00 38.00 4 - CORE IC 1.00 47.00 8.00 4.00 6.00 66.00 5 - TalTech 1.00 30.00 3.00 20.00 2.00 15.00 71.00 6 - MNLT 1.00 36.00 6.00 43.00 7 - Terradat 1.00 6.00 45.60 10.00 19.20 3.00 4.00 88.80 8 - XCALIBUR 1.00 42.00 18.00 12.00 1.00 2.00 76.00 9 - EGT 1.00 25.00 3.00 30.00 2.00 5.00 66.00 10 - ATALAYA MINING 1.00 3.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 14.00 11 - MINER SA 1.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 12.00 Total Person-Months 41.00 68.50 54.50 95.10 97.50 133.20 53.50 99.00 642.30 16 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 LIST OF DELIVERABLES Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No D1.1 Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data WP1 1 - ISMC DMP — Data PU - Public 6 management plans (DMP) I Management Plan D1.2 Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data WP1 1 - ISMC DMP — Data PU - Public 36 management plans (DMP) II Management Plan D1.3 IPR inventory of original and protectable WP1 1 - ISMC R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 8 results I D1.4 IPR inventory of original and protectable WP1 1 - ISMC R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 32 results II D2.1 Systemic Estonian geochemical and WP2 5 - TalTech DATA — data sets, SEN - Sensitive 14 petrophysical database microdata, etc D2.2 Drill scanning database WP2 9 - EGT DATA — data sets, SEN - Sensitive 18 microdata, etc D2.3 Early Estonian ore model at different scales WP2 5 - TalTech R — Document, report PU - Public 12 D2.4 Early Estonian ore model with comparative WP2 5 - TalTech R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 24 analysis D3.1 Remote field mineral detection Prototype WP3 3 - UNICA DEM — Demonstrator, SEN - Sensitive 18 pilot, prototype D3.2 Spectral library WP3 2 - ICCS R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 18 17 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No D3.3 ML/DL based mineral exploration methods WP3 2 - ICCS R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 20 with remote sensing data D3.4 ML/DL methods used by the field mineral WP3 3 - UNICA R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 20 detector D4.1 UAV with gravimetry technology WP4 8 - XCALIBUR DEM — Demonstrator, SEN - Sensitive 18 pilot, prototype D5.1 Advancement on the visualization and WP5 4 - CORE IC R — Document, report PU - Public 24 interaction platform D5.2 3D Geological Modeling and Extended WP5 8 - XCALIBUR R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 32 Reality tools D6.1 Final mineral remote sensing exploration WP6 2 - ICCS R — Document, report PU - Public 23 maps D6.2 UAV exploration with gravimeter sensor WP6 8 - XCALIBUR R — Document, report PU - Public 29 flights D6.3 Passive seismic survey WP6 7 - Terradat R — Document, report PU - Public 29 D6.4 Estonian ore models and Resource WP6 5 - TalTech R — Document, report PU - Public 36 assessment D7.1 Life Cycle, Life Cycle Cost and Social Life WP7 6 - MNLT R — Document, report PU - Public 36 Cycle Assessments D8.1 DEC Plan and execution I WP8 1 - ISMC R — Document, report PU - Public 4 18 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No D8.2 DEC Plan and execution II WP8 1 - ISMC R — Document, report PU - Public 20 D8.3 DEC Plan and execution III WP8 1 - ISMC R — Document, report PU - Public 36 D8.4 Joint clustering activity plan WP8 1.1 - ICAMCYL R — Document, report PU - Public 8 D8.5 Joint clustering activity report WP8 1.1 - ICAMCYL R — Document, report PU - Public 36 D8.6 Techno-economic analysis and Business WP8 6 - MNLT R — Document, report SEN - Sensitive 36 Plan D8.7 Report on the International workshop and WP8 1.1 - ICAMCYL R — Document, report PU - Public 36 Roadmap of common actions 19 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D1.1 – Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) I Deliverable Number D1.1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) I Type DMP — Data Management Dissemination Level PU - Public Plan Due Date (month) 6 Work Package No WP1 Description Report with risk assessment and plan/actions to manage data under FAIR principles Deliverable D1.2 – Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) II Deliverable Number D1.2 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name Quality Assurance (QAP), and risks and data management plans (DMP) II Type DMP — Data Management Dissemination Level PU - Public Plan Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP1 Description Report on implementation of risk assessment and plan/actions to manage data under FAIR principles Deliverable D1.3 – IPR inventory of original and protectable results I Deliverable Number D1.3 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name IPR inventory of original and protectable results I Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 8 Work Package No WP1 Description List of innovations and protection measures to use for exploitation Deliverable D1.4 – IPR inventory of original and protectable results II Deliverable Number D1.4 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name IPR inventory of original and protectable results II Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 32 Work Package No WP1 Description Updated list of innovations and protection measures to use for exploitation 20 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D2.1 – Systemic Estonian geochemical and petrophysical database Deliverable Number D2.1 Lead Beneficiary 5 - TalTech Deliverable Name Systemic Estonian geochemical and petrophysical database Type DATA — data sets, Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive microdata, etc Due Date (month) 14 Work Package No WP2 Description Report with existing and new data, including statistical models. Deliverable D2.2 – Drill scanning database Deliverable Number D2.2 Lead Beneficiary 9 - EGT Deliverable Name Drill scanning database Type DATA — data sets, Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive microdata, etc Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP2 Description Collection drill cores XRF, infrared, magnetic susceptibility multiscanning measurements. Deliverable D2.3 – Early Estonian ore model at different scales Deliverable Number D2.3 Lead Beneficiary 5 - TalTech Deliverable Name Early Estonian ore model at different scales Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP2 Description Report with early model based on the available databases. Deliverable D2.4 – Early Estonian ore model with comparative analysis Deliverable Number D2.4 Lead Beneficiary 5 - TalTech Deliverable Name Early Estonian ore model with comparative analysis Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP2 Description Report expanding and updating the early ore model, including comparison with Bergslagen, Sweden and considering data from Sub-task 6.1.1 Remote sensing analysis. 21 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D3.1 – Remote field mineral detection Prototype Deliverable Number D3.1 Lead Beneficiary 3 - UNICA Deliverable Name Remote field mineral detection Prototype Type DEM — Demonstrator, Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive pilot, prototype Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP3 Description Device for the remote identification of CRM/SRM Deliverable D3.2 – Spectral library Deliverable Number D3.2 Lead Beneficiary 2 - ICCS Deliverable Name Spectral library Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP3 Description Report with spectral sample collection process, design/ development of the database for data storage and retrieval. Deliverable D3.3 – ML/DL based mineral exploration methods with remote sensing data Deliverable Number D3.3 Lead Beneficiary 2 - ICCS Deliverable Name ML/DL based mineral exploration methods with remote sensing data Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 20 Work Package No WP3 Description Report with ML/DL methods for target minerals detection with remote sensing data. Deliverable D3.4 – ML/DL methods used by the field mineral detector Deliverable Number D3.4 Lead Beneficiary 3 - UNICA Deliverable Name ML/DL methods used by the field mineral detector Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 20 Work Package No WP3 Description Report with the ML/DL methods for identification/quantification of samples using D3.1. 22 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D4.1 – UAV with gravimetry technology Deliverable Number D4.1 Lead Beneficiary 8 - XCALIBUR Deliverable Name UAV with gravimetry technology Type DEM — Demonstrator, Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive pilot, prototype Due Date (month) 18 Work Package No WP4 Description UAV Gravimetric airborne prototype Deliverable D5.1 – Advancement on the visualization and interaction platform Deliverable Number D5.1 Lead Beneficiary 4 - CORE IC Deliverable Name Advancement on the visualization and interaction platform Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP5 Description Summary with the platform specifications, smart visualization dashboard and UI. Deliverable D5.2 – 3D Geological Modeling and Extended Reality tools Deliverable Number D5.2 Lead Beneficiary 8 - XCALIBUR Deliverable Name 3D Geological Modeling and Extended Reality tools Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 32 Work Package No WP5 Description Report with a summary of the 3D and XR platform features Deliverable D6.1 – Final mineral remote sensing exploration maps Deliverable Number D6.1 Lead Beneficiary 2 - ICCS Deliverable Name Final mineral remote sensing exploration maps Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 23 Work Package No WP6 Description Mineral exploration mapping process with remote sensing data via direct field sample identification. 23 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D6.2 – UAV exploration with gravimeter sensor flights Deliverable Number D6.2 Lead Beneficiary 8 - XCALIBUR Deliverable Name UAV exploration with gravimeter sensor flights Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 29 Work Package No WP6 Description Geophysical maps and cross-sections (inc. geological), analysis, interpretation, and resource assessment reaching at least 600 m depth, considering results from WP2 and D6.1 Deliverable D6.3 – Passive seismic survey Deliverable Number D6.3 Lead Beneficiary 7 - Terradat Deliverable Name Passive seismic survey Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 29 Work Package No WP6 Description Geophysical maps, geological and seismic velocity cross-sections, analysis, interpretation, and resource assessment reaching at least 600 m depth, considering results from WP2 and D6.1 Deliverable D6.4 – Estonian ore models and Resource assessment Deliverable Number D6.4 Lead Beneficiary 5 - TalTech Deliverable Name Estonian ore models and Resource assessment Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP6 Description Advanced geological and mineral model for the Estonian Precambrian Basement. Deliverable D7.1 – Life Cycle, Life Cycle Cost and Social Life Cycle Assessments Deliverable Number D7.1 Lead Beneficiary 6 - MNLT Deliverable Name Life Cycle, Life Cycle Cost and Social Life Cycle Assessments Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP7 Description Comprehensive report with the results, findings, recommendations 24 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D8.1 – DEC Plan and execution I Deliverable Number D8.1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name DEC Plan and execution I Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 4 Work Package No WP8 Description Coinciding with the Reports delivery for providing a complete overview of the project implementation Deliverable D8.2 – DEC Plan and execution II Deliverable Number D8.2 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name DEC Plan and execution II Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 20 Work Package No WP8 Description Update version of dissemination, exploitation and communication activities Deliverable D8.3 – DEC Plan and execution III Deliverable Number D8.3 Lead Beneficiary 1 - ISMC Deliverable Name DEC Plan and execution III Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP8 Description Final report of the dissemination, exploitation and communication activities Deliverable D8.4 – Joint clustering activity plan Deliverable Number D8.4 Lead Beneficiary 1.1 - ICAMCYL Deliverable Name Joint clustering activity plan Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 8 Work Package No WP8 Description Elaboration and implementation of a joint clustering activity plan 25 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Deliverable D8.5 – Joint clustering activity report Deliverable Number D8.5 Lead Beneficiary 1.1 - ICAMCYL Deliverable Name Joint clustering activity report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP8 Description Update and report on implementation of elaboration and implementation of the joint clustering activity plan Deliverable D8.6 – Techno-economic analysis and Business Plan Deliverable Number D8.6 Lead Beneficiary 6 - MNLT Deliverable Name Techno-economic analysis and Business Plan Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level SEN - Sensitive Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP8 Description Techno-economic analysis and Business Plan Deliverable D8.7 – Report on the International workshop and Roadmap of common actions Deliverable Number D8.7 Lead Beneficiary 1.1 - ICAMCYL Deliverable Name Report on the International workshop and Roadmap of common actions Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP8 Description Comprehensive report with the results, findings, recommendations 26 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 LIST OF MILESTONES Milestones Grant Preparation (Milestones screen) — Enter the info. Milestone Milestone Name Work Package No Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Due Date No (month) 1 DEXPLORE project successfully launched WP1 1 - ISMC Celebration of the kick of meeting lead by ISMC 1 and counting on the participation of all partners. 2 Dissemination and Communication plan WP8 1 - ISMC D8.1 - DEC Plan submitted 4 delivery 3 Early Estonian ore models at different scales WP4 5 - TalTech D2.3 - Report with early model based on 12 the databases + comparison with Bergslagen, Sweden. 4 Finetuned land-based seismic passive WP4 7 - Terradat D4.2 - Modelling results for optimizing 12 methodology acquisition parameters, processing, and inversion data. 5 Remote field mineral detection Prototype WP3 3 - UNICA D3.1 - Device for the remote identification of 18 CRM/SRM in field 6 UAV with gravimetry technology WP3 1 - ISMC D4.1 - UAV Gravimetric airborne prototype 18 7 2 Calibration pilots targeting metallic WP4 7 - Terradat D4.3 - Gravimetry and passive seismic results 22 and nonmetallic minerals with different (acquisition, processing, and inversion) in two configurations (dissemination, along planar calibration pilots guaranteeing that at least 600 m structures) completed depth are reached. 8 Initial version of the advanced GIS/XR WP5 4 - CORE IC D5.1 - Summary with the platform specifications, 24 visualization and interaction platform smart visualization dashboard and UI 9 Final validation pilot for remote sensing WP6 9 - EGT T6.1 dedicated to the data collection using 29 and geophysical exploration technology the technology developed in DEXPLORE about completed remote sensing and geophysical survey is successfully completed. 27 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Milestones Grant Preparation (Milestones screen) — Enter the info. Milestone Milestone Name Work Package No Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Due Date No (month) 10 XR platform validation and Social License to WP6 2 - ICCS First results of its validation and Social License 33 Operate to Operate (T6.3) 11 International workshop WP8 1.1 - ICAMCYL International workshop counting on the 34 participation of stakeholders and AB members 12 Estonian ore models and Resource assessment WP6 9 - EGT D6.4 - Advanced geological and mineral model 36 for the Estonian Precambrian Basement targeting Cu (SRM), Ni (SRM), Mn (SRM/CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM), Zn, Pb, Mo. 13 Guarantee the reduced environmental WP7 6 - MNLT Final LCA, LCC, S-LCA reports 36 impact offered by the implementation of DEXPLORE technologies 14 Techno-economic analysis and Business Plan WP8 6 - MNLT D8.3 – Results of the comprehensive assessment 36 LIST OF CRITICAL RISKS Critical risks & risk management strategy Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info. Risk Description Work Package Proposed Mitigation Measures number No(s) 1 Lack of time and/or budget to fulfil the goals of the WP4, WP1, WP3, The lack of time and budget is a problem that can occur in any project. However, the strong project. L/H WP5, WP2, WP8, experience of the coordinator, the administrative manager, and all partners in European or WP6, WP7 national projects tends to minimize this risk. Moreover, the project is done over three full years to ensure that the time needed to implement each task properly will be taken. The budget 28 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Critical risks & risk management strategy Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info. Risk Description Work Package Proposed Mitigation Measures number No(s) has been carefully made to consider all costs that will occur during the project. Correction actions will be taken if needed during the consortium meetings. 2 Non-collaborative partner L/M WP4, WP1, WP3, The risk depends on which partner is failing. The risk is not critical since there are some WP5, WP2, WP8, overlaps among the participant’s expertise and involvement. This will ensure a technical WP6, WP7 solution to any kind of problem. The Consortium Agreement will have a provision for this situation. In case one of those partners fails, then it might be necessary to replace the partner and to reallocate the tasks to another partner. Within the consortium there is enough expertise available to overcome this case. Improved instructions for handling the necessary documentation will be supplied. 3 Difficulties in collecting data concerning the LA- WP2 The proposed measure would be to conduct the same LA-ICP-MS analyses in another ICP-MS. L/M institution with the required standards, to guarantee the analysis and set data post-treatment. 4 Difficulty in integrating Raman, LIBS, and WP3 To avoid this risk early prototyping and testing to identify technical issues before they become fluorescence spectroscopy into a compact design M/ critical will be done. Also, UNICA can consider a modular design approach where each L spectroscopy technique (Raman, LIBS, fluorescence) is developed as a separate module. This allows for easier integration, testing, and potential upgrades or replacements of individual components without redesigning the entire system. 5 Not adequate data available for the ML/AI models WP3 The consortium will list the datasets needed at the beginning of the project, collecting all L/H the data needed during the first period. Alternative data sources will be identified in order to mitigate the risk of not having the data available in time and/or in the appropriate structure. In case of data aggregation delay due to force majeure the deliverable scheduling will be accordingly and justifiably adjusted. 6 Passive seismic data acquisition harmed by the theft WP4 TerraDat will propose a) the use a dense network of seismic nodes, which makes it possible or damage of seismic nodes (these remain buried for to compensate potential nodes losses, b) hide the sensors as much as possible, c) and monitor several days). the sensor network to replace those that do not work. 7 Gravity data may not be adequate to reduce the size WP4 To mitigate the risk, Xcalibur have planned several test flights (2 calibration pilots and a final of the gravimeter sensor for UAV when compared to Estonian pilot) which allow for calibrating the sensor enough and work in a similar range of traditional gravimeters. M/M reliability while reaching the set KPIs. 8 Challenges in integrating geophysical, WP5 The establishment of standardized data formats and metadata schemas will facilitate seamless 29 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Critical risks & risk management strategy Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info. Risk Description Work Package Proposed Mitigation Measures number No(s) petrophysical, and mineralogical data from disparate integration of multi-modal data. Also, the development of interoperable data processing sources may hinder a comprehensive geological and pipelines and workflows will automate data integration tasks and ensure consistency. Foster mineral model. M/H collaboration and communication among interdisciplinary teams to address integration challenges effectively. 9 Variability in data quality and consistency due WP6 The technical partners will implement rigorous quality control measures during data to factors such as sensor noise, atmospheric collection and pre-processing stages. Regular calibration checks will be conducted and interference, or variations in instrument calibration standardized processing techniques to minimize variability will be used. Also, validation of H/L data consistency will be done via cross-validation with ground truth data and independent verification methods. 10 Difficulties in collecting data for all parameters and WP7 Data collection, in collaboration with the technical partners and their international networks, scenarios required for the LCA, S-LCA and LCC will begin in early stages of the project. A comprehensive literature review will also be studies L/M conducted to support the data collection. 30 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 PROJECT REVIEWS Project Reviews Grant Preparation (Reviews screen) — Enter the info. Review Timing Location Comments No (month) RV1 20 to be determined RV2 36 to be determined 31  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 RECOGNIZING EUROPEAN POTENTIAL FOR HOSTING DEEP LAND PRIMARY CRM BY COMBINING NEW MINERAL MODELS AND ADVANCED EXPLORATION AND VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES TABLE OF HISTORY OF CHANGES Version (date) Changes V.1 (18/06/2024) Annex 1 Part A - List of partners: The ICCS Affiliated Entity “Cibos” is deleted and the new Affiliated Entity “CogniSensus” (PIC number 877176918) is added, still under ICSS. CogniSensus is a spin-off company of ICSS dedicated specifically to the area of work of DEXPLORE, which improves the quality of the delivery of the project and is more suited for the tasks planned in the project, i.e. “T3.3 Hyperspectral signatures of unknown materials”. The budget, staff effort and any other activity that was related to “CIBOS” is directly taken over by “CogniSensus”. - WP1 Objectives: deleted reference to “Table 3.1e” and added reference to “Table “List of critical risks””. - WP1, T1.2: deleted reference to “defined in Section 1.x” as the section does not appear in the DoA. - WP1, T1.2: deleted reference to “Table 3.1d” as it does not appear in the DoA; changed to “Milestones table”. - WP3: changed the end date to “M20” to bring it in line with due dates of the deliverables in the WP3. - WP8: Updated the description of T8.3 on clustering activities to address evaluation comments. - D1.1: split the deliverable into two (D1.1 & D1.2) to allow two different iterations: plan (M6) and update (M36) of QAP and DAP; updated the description to reflect the changes. - D2.3: split the deliverable into two (D2.3 & D2.4) to allow two different iterations: early report (M12) and comparative analysis (M24); updated the description to reflect the changes. - D8.1: split the deliverable into three (D8.1, D8.2, & D8.3) to reflect preparation (M4), update (M20) and reporting (M36), of DEC activities and align them with project reporting requirements; updated the description to reflect the changes. - D8.2: Joint clustering activity plan: split the deliverable into two (D8.4, & D8.5) to allow two iterations: planning (M8) and reporting (M36), of clustering activities; updated the description to reflect the changes. - D8.6: Technoeconomic analysis and Business plan: the dissemination level is changed to SEN to reflect the nature of the document and information produced. - Deliverables – as a consequence of the above changes the total number of deliverables has increased from 23 to 27; the numbering has been updated accordingly. - Changed staff effort for UNICA, as suggested by the ESR: moved 1 Person Month (PM) from WP3 to WP5 to ensure there is enough capacity allocated for T5.1 for this partner. V.1 (18/06/2024) Annex 1 Part B 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 1  - We have reduced the KPIs to 17Associated withdocument across the document Ref. asAres(2024)6673353 suggested by the- 20/09/2024 ESR. At least one KPI per WP is retained. Hower, we have kept the specific KPIs listed in “Table 6. DEXPLORE Dissemination activities”. - Added scientific references to “Table 2. Summary of how DEXPLORE innovations surpass the state-of-the-art” to address ESR comment. - Section 1.2.6. Open Science – added reference to relevant repositories to address ESR comment on Criterion 1. - Added section 4: Ethics self-assessment. - Added mention of possible travel costs outside the EU, especially in relation to clustering and Advisory Board activities. V.2 (05/07/2024) Annex 1 Part B - Amended numbering of beneficiaries in section 3.2 and table 3.1g and 3.1 h to match list in Annex 1 DoA. - Provided details for travel costs for ISMC and ICAMCyL in table 31.h “purchase costs” items, insofar as practical. - Provided details in table 3.1h on costs and depreciation for “equipment” for beneficiaries N.7 TerraDat and N.8 Xcalibur. For the latter minor adjustment of total amount of “equipment” costs to reflect depreciation; no change in overall budget allocated. - Added details in Table 3.1h of CFS for partners: N.1; N.5; N.8, insofar as practical. - Added information on the role of Affiliated Entity N. 2.1 CogniSensus, and relationship with ICCS. V.3 (31/07/2024) Annex 1 Part A - Modified budget of beneficiary 6 (MNLT): transferred around 50% of personnel costs from Category A1 Employees to Category A4 SME owner, to reflect more accurately participation of staff according to contractual situation. Overall allocations of budget and staff effort remain unchanged. Annex 1 Part B - Added justification for preselection of contractor by TalTech in table 3.1g. Contents 1. Excellence .............................................................................................................................................................3 2. Impact .................................................................................................................................................................22 2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact ...........................................................................................................22 2.2 Measures to maximize impact: Dissemination, exploitation and communication. ...................................28 2.3 Summary ...........................................................................................................................................................31 Quality and efficiency of the implementation............................................................................................................31 3.1 Work plan and resources ............................................................................................................................31 3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole..................................................................................35 4. Ethic self-assessment..........................................................................................................................................40 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 2  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Part B: technical description RECOGNIZING EUROPEAN POTENTIAL FOR HOSTING DEEP LAND PRIMARY CRM BY COMBINING NEW MINERAL MODELS AND ADVANCED EXPLORATION AND VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES 1. Excellence Critical and Strategic Raw Materials (CRM and SRM, respectively) are essential in the development of new “environmental technologies” that improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For instance, electric vehicles and other clean energy technologies are vital elements of the world’s efforts to combat climate change, and these will demand many times more critical minerals than today. In this context, in Europe, the Raw Material Initiative - a plan for addressing the problem of secure access to sustainable raw materials for the EU - was approved by the Commission in 2008 (COM, 2008). In general, the EU Industrial Policy Strategy reaffirmed the raw materials policy, which recognizes raw materials as critical components of industrial value chains (COM, 2017). To achieve resource security, actions must be taken to diversify supply from primary and secondary sources and enhance resource independence, efficiency, and circularity, including sustainable product design. Indeed, currently, the EU domestic supply of primary CRMs is below 3% for many important commodities. This is true for all raw materials, including basic metals, industrial minerals, aggregates, and biological materials (COM, 2020; EC, 2019). A significant supply risk exists in Europe for certain metals and as such it is an urgent task to increase the CRM and SRM supply detecting also deep-seated mineral deposits. Maintaining value chains and the well-being of the European economy requires reliable access to metallic and non-metallic key resources. This issue is not only affecting the European countries. According to the International Energy Agency (Bouckaert et al., 2021) the world’s critical minerals demand will increase > 400% from now to 2050. It is then an urgent need to properly detect mineral deposits, including both CRM and SRM, following sustainable and cost-efficient practices and increasing exploration projects across Europe, to later continue strengthening the strategic alliances in terms of key mineral supply, extrapolating and scaling technology, practices and procedures. 1.1 Ambition and objectives Despite exploration technological advances, the discovery rate of ore deposits has kept declining over the past 30 years. Indeed, finding new mineral deposits is becoming more challenging as we increasingly exhaust the supply of shallow deposits and are forced to explore deeper underground. Under these circumstances, conceptual geological prediction of mineralization in greenfield exploration -new ore models - based on sophisticated deep-land exploration techniques, analysis, and interpretation of large datasets, are becoming increasingly important. DEXPLORE ambition is then to a) potentiate the knowledge and discovery of deep-seated deposits and increase the sustainable and low-risk internal sourcing of CRMs and SRMs, needed to decarbonize the European and global economy. All of these while b) working on the involvement of the general public and specific stakeholders (e.g. community close to the pilot areas, countries included in the strategic partnerships on CRM, geological services, mining industry) across the project advancement for increasing the acceptability of mining projects starting by the exploration process and ensure the replicability and scalability of DEXPLORE results. Reaching DEXPLORE ambition will be possible by combining innovation at different levels starting at the Earth surface to subsurface (up to at least 600 m depth) together with advanced visualization tools required to efficiently develop accurate new ore models for deep-seated CRM/SRM while increasing the awareness of the general public. Thus, DEXPLORE will propose mineral models for geological terrains well extended across Europe, such as crystalline and metamorphic rocks, and disseminated mineralization or along planar structures, targeting CRM and SRM at least up to 600 m depth: Fluorite (Fluorspar – CRM), Copper (SRM), Nickel (SRM), Manganese (SRM and CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM) as well as Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), and Molybdenum (Mo). 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 3 It is essential to recognize that geophysical techniques are just oneAssociated piece of with the document puzzle inRef. Ares(2024)6673353 mineral - 20/09/2024 exploration, albeit an integral one. Once the general context is defined, other detailed techniques are required to refine the model and precisely detect and map the mineral of interest. This is the reason why DEXPLORE is proposing a complete package of innovations from surface to subsurface to arrive at a complete visualization and exploration tool for mapping the potential of deep-seated primary CRM/SRM across the EU by focusing on widespread geological terrains with promising possibilities for hosting these materials (Fig. 1). DEXPLORE information levels and proposed innovations are: Combination of a) well-structured existing information (e.g., geochemistry, A) geophysics, petrophysics) with b) new data acquired with modern techniques. Advanced a) hyperspectral and multispectral EO approach, b) novel remote field mineral detector combining advanced optical techniques (Raman, LIBS, and fluorescence spectroscopy); both involving ML/DL methods for detection of target minerals with remote sensing data. a) Airborne-based survey based on an innovative unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry, and b) Land-based survey based on an avant-garde and standard seismic methodology for complex geological settings based on seismic nodes and seismic passive acquisition (potential up to 1,500 m depth). a) Databases integration and 3D geological models (GIS) combined with b) Extended reality (XR) visualization advanced technologies for bring closer the geological information to both the general public and the technical community. B) Fig. 1. A) DEXPLORE complete innovation package from surface to subsurface; B) Use of Level 4 - Visualization and interaction platform based on GIS and XR to enhance general public and stakeholders’ acceptability and awareness about CRM/SRM. With the aim of reaching DEXPLORE ambition, we have set the next project objectives: 1.1.1. General and specific objectives General objectives: a) Develop new and updated ore models for targeted critical and strategic raw materials for well extended geological domains across Europe such as crystalline and metamorphic rocks with metallic and non-metallic mineralization. b) Improve exploration technologies allowing for highly efficient and sustainable exploration for reaching at least 600 m depth, including: i) UAV assisted and remote mineral exploration and identification. ii) Hyperspectral analysis using Earth Observation (EO) data (Copernicus databases). iii) Innovative geophysics exploration tools for deep land deposits including airborne and field-based methods. c) Increase access to information about the EU potential in primary and critical raw materials for EU industrial value chains and strategic sectors by providing a visualization platform combining different levels of information (geological data, remote sensing, geophysical data, etc). Gamification using this platform will support the delivery of some key messages and improve the awareness of the general public across EU about: • The importance of CRM for a successful transition to a climate-neutral and digitized economy and society. • The ensuing need for a secure, sustainable, and responsibly sourced supply of raw materials, including from domestic sources to strengthen EU open strategic autonomy and reduce over-dependence on third countries. d) Bost the cooperation between Europe and the countries involved in the strategic partnerships for a resilient and 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 4  Associatedcontacts sustainable supply of raw materials by strengthening the outstanding with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 of DEXPLORE partners- setting 20/09/2024 up a robust Advisory Board (AB) joining EU and non-EU geological services, mining schools, clusters and associations of exploration and mining, and stakeholders of the critical raw materials sectors. e) Clustering activities with other EU initiatives and relevant selected projects for cross-projects co-operation, consultations and joint activities on cross-cutting issues and share of results as well as participating in joint meetings and communication events. Specific objectives (Table 1): Table 1. DEXPLORE specific objectives including KPIs. Specific objective including KPIs Level 1 - Mineral systems approach (WP2) Ore models for crystalline and metamorphic basement. (TalTech, GSE) • Development of a comprehensive database for petrological, geochemical and geophysical research of the Estonian Precambrian Basement (Jöhvi and Alutaguse zones). KPI 1: sample analysis volume: at least 100 samples analyzed from each zone, with a focus on high-C graphite gneisses and sulphide and related mineralization. Create two distinct mineral, geochemical, and pre-existing GSE’s information (geochemistry, limited petrophysical data, magnetometric and gravimetrical maps, drilled materials and historical logs, as well as raw material) datasets, one for Jöhvi and another for Alutaguse. Develop a geothermobarometer model based on garnet measurements. Establish distribution profiles for targeted elements (C, Zn, Pb, Cu, Ni, Mo) and minerals (sulphides, garnets, graphite). Conduct textural analyses using SEM, EPMA, and LA-ICP-MS on sulphides and selected complementary minerals, such as garnets and zircons. • Early geological and ore modeling of NE Estonian Basement - Jöhvi and Alutaguse zones for CRM/SRM at least up to 600 m depth. Tracking the completion and depth of statistical analyses based on three categories: rock types, minerals, and targeted deep-seated CRM/SRM (Cu (SRM), Ni (SRM), Mn (SRM, CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM), Zn, Pb, Mo). It measures the comprehensiveness of the data analysis per category. KPI 2: measures the progress and efficiency in incorporating hyperspectral, XRF core scanning, and petrophysical measurements from drill cores into the project. Assess the extent to which historical data is successfully integrated with new findings. Development of Jöhvi Ore Model. Development of Alutaguse Ore Model. Multispectral and hyperspectral analysis. (ICCS) Level 2 - Remote Sensing for surface • Implementation of EO based approaches for regional and local mineral surface exploration using multispectral and hyperspectral sensors of a wide range of spatial resolutions. EO pipelines for processing multispectral data from Sentinel-2 mission (10m, 20m and 60m spatial resolution) and hyperspectral data from EnMAP and PRISMA (30m of spatial exploration (WP3) resolution); drone data exploitation. • To formulate a raw materials spectral library convolved to selected hyperspectral sensors. KPI 3: Formulation of spectral library consisting of at least 4 materials. Novel remote field mineral detector combining advanced optical techniques. (UNICA) • Design and build a prototype for remote mineral detection (Raman+LIBs+fluorescence spectroscopy) with dimension and weight compatible with drone integration (20x8x8 cm in size; weight of ca. 300-400 g). • Achieve a target Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of 10 for Raman signals to ensure reliable and accurate mineral detection. It will be calculated from the acquired spectra under various testing conditions. • Confirm the prototype's ability to operate optimally at a set working distance. Optimal working distance 3 to 5 meters, confirmed by assessing the performance and data quality. • KPI 4: ensure stability <5% in the optical setup to maintain a consistent Signal/Noise ratio. Innovative unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry. (Xcalibur) • Optimization of a UAV scalar gravity system capable of measuring KPI 5:1mGal at wavelength of 500m. Level 3 - Geophysical techniques for • Navigation system optimization for reaching small line spacing at low speeds. • Data processing: filtering, down-sampling IMU raw data considering coning and sculling, adapting a direct approach (from deep land exploration (WP4) i-frame to n-frame) or/and an indirect-approach (using kalman filters to fuse IMU and GNSS data). Avant-garde land-based survey methodology using seismic nodes and seismic passive acquisitions (TerraDat) The goal is to create a general methodology and guidelines for successfully seismic noise surveys for deep-seated CRM/SRM exploration (i.e., metallic, and non-metallic) with potential up to 1,500 m depth, considering the geological context, the local noise characteristics, and the depth of investigation. To do so, TerraDat will advance with: • Analysis of both different sensor spacings and maximum seismic line length to evaluate the minimum resolution to locate and characterize the mineralization and geological features. KPI 6: initial target depth up to 600 m, enough resolution to locate and define mineralization geometry and related geological features. • Optimization of the time window acquisition needed to obtain reliable results considering the geological context, investigation depth, and the local seismic noise features. KPI 7: between 5 to 15 days. • Test of various types of processing methods to obtain reliable seismic cross-sections. KPI 8: at least two inversion methods will be validated. • Run 2 calibration pilots in well-explored mining sites for verifying that the set KPIs for both the innovative unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry and the avant-garde land-based survey using seismic nodes are reached before proceeding with the final validation in Estonia. KPI 9: 2 calibration pilots, one at Masa Valverde mine (Metallic CRM/SRM, ATM) and other at MINERSA Fluorite mine (non-metallic CRM, MINERSA). and exploitation platform (WP5) Visualization and exploitation platform. (CORE) Visualization • Develop an innovative platform serving as a reliable communication platform among heterogeneous levels of information Level 4 - (e.g. different data sources and applications) while facilitating seamless interactions among entities with different interfaces, operating systems, and architectures. Modular approach built on a common IT infrastructure layer and integrating a diverse range of data sources, including AI models, individual components, and Decision Support Systems (DSS). • Address complexities of data-driven decision-making landscapes regarding interoperability, process time, scalability, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 5  efficiency, and cost. Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 • Meet stringent regulatory requirements also considering data privacy and security. Ensuring compliance with evolving protocols and safeguarding sensitive information. 3D Geological modeling. (Xcalibur) • Enhance the understanding and management of underground deposits by achieving an accurate and detailed geographical representation of deposits geometry and distribution in the subsurface (GIS). KPI 10: optimal metric precision of at least 90% by evaluating the agreement between the generated models and in-situ exploration data. • Attain greater efficiency in identifying zones with high mineral concentration levels directly translated into increased accuracy in extraction planning and resource optimization. Basic model's ability to highlight areas of interest, assessed by comparing model predictions with drilling and sampling test results. • Integrate model's capacity to anticipate variability in mineral properties throughout the deposit. Spatial variability and heterogeneity of mineral characteristics directly impact the efficiency of extraction and processing processes. Model's ability to accurately predict variations in mineral properties. Extended Reality (XR) Capabilities promoting interaction with scientific and geological information. (ICCS) • To facilitate the visualization of 3D geological models, ensure data and knowledge exchange to further improve the decision- making process. Development of 1 XR application (in VR or AR/MR) for the visualization of 3D geological models and other data used by >30 stakeholders. • To improve the awareness of the general public about the importance of raw materials for a successful transition to a climate- neutral and digitized economy and society. KPI 11: development of 1 XR application (in VR or AR/MR) used by >30 end- users from the pilots, to ensure understanding and acceptance towards the importance of raw materials >80% assessed through evaluation forms distributed through the application. Develop a mobile AR application for educational and acceptability activities, while fostering a collaborative approach to sustainable exploration practices. • Running the final validation of the DEXPLORE technology developed for surface and deep-land CRM/SRM exploration up to 600m. Exploration Accuracy and Precision: Assesses the precision of DEXPLORE exploration techniques in delineating deep-seated ore deposits by comparing predicted geological models (based on integrated survey data) with actual findings from Estonian drilling or sampling. Surface exploration: Remote sensing • To facilitate CRM/SRM exploration including EO approach for mapping of geological features that could be indicators for defining areas with possible mineralization and thus ideal for exploration at local scale and detection of ore deposits (ICCS) maps of geological features validated in the final pilot – WP6. • To validate in-field the accuracy and effectiveness of the field mineral detector for spectral analysis of hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data (UNICA). >90% of detected mineral occurrences accurately confirmed through spectral Final in-field technology validation (WP6) analysis compared to ground truth data. Subsurface exploration: Deep-land geophysical survey. • Obtention of permits to fly UAVs BVLOS (beyond the visual line of sight) (Xcalibur) • Validate the results of the UAVs standard gravity survey by contrasting them with the expected density contrast and other available data. • Validate the methodology and guidelines defined for the seismic noise survey for deep-seated CRM/SRM exploration – metallic and non-metallic (TerraDat). Provide a seismic velocity cross-section (obtained from the passive seismic survey) to interpret geological and mineral features up to 700 m depth. Final Estonian mineral model - Data interpretation and resource assessment. • Integration of geophysical, petrological, and mineral data to create an advanced geological and mineral model for the Estonian metamorphic Precambrian basement, including mineralization, most important geological structures and units given rise to the mineralization. Efficiency: Evaluates the efficiency of integrating new seismic and gravity data with existing GSE data (WP2). Tracks the time and resources required for merging and analyzing data from multiple sources to create a comprehensive geological model. Anomaly Detection Rate: Measure the success rate of identifying significant geophysical anomalies (such as gravity and magnetic) using satellite, airborne, and GSE pre-existing data. KPI 12: Final ore models for the Estonian crystalline and metamorphic basement by advanced data interpretation (coming from all information levels) and resource assessment. • Comparison of the final mineralization model with known ore areas in Southern Finland and Bergslagen area in Sweden. Extend the knowledge about East-European Craton (Baltic States). Social License to Operate (SLO): Educational/acceptability activities involving general public. • KPI 13: Introducing the Estonian model (WP6) and calibration pilots (WP4) to the 3 geological surveys of Finland, Sweden and Lithuania, respectively - and to the Advisory Board. • Results of demonstration activities, including validation and SLO. Involve the general public and stakeholders around the Estonian and Spanish pilot areas in educational and engagement activities. • Promote DEXPLORE technology designed and developed under sustainability and circularity principles. To do so, MNLT Assessment & LCA will identify and prioritize requirements for monitoring environmental and social impacts to be implemented in a transparent, (WP7) (MNLT) Environmental timely and cost-effective manner. Estimate environmental and socio-economic impacts brought by the implementation of the DEXPLORE technologies, considering the need for key resources, as well as geographical, geological and other constraints. 35% reduction in overall environmental footprint, including considerable decreases in energy consumption. • Demonstrate the overall impact of DEXPLORE technologies as cutting-edge advancements allowing for enhancing the EU exploration of deep-seated CRM/SRM. KPI 14: Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) including data for other novel exploration technologies, where applicable, to facilitate the environmental performance evaluation, in the form of the Life Cycle and Social Life Cycle Assessments. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 6  • Planning a comprehensive strategy for dissemination, exploitation,Associated with document and communication Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 (DEC) activities, including- 20/09/2024 as key Communication and Clustering (WP8) target to fortify awareness and acceptance of the European public about emerging exploration technologies (DEC plan delivered at M4 – ISMC, MNLT) Dissemination, Exploitation, • Potentiate connections and synergies between relevant R&I projects in the EU (KPI 15: 3 clustering events and a joint clustering activity plan in collaboration with relevant projects and organizations – ICAMCyL, ISMC). • Active involvement of key stakeholders (strengthening of the Advisory Board consolidating the connections with the countries included in the European strategic partnerships on raw materials. Organization of an international workshop and report with recommendations and findings pointing to the formulation of a roadmap for common actions that addresses the evolving landscape of exploration technologies). • Development of comprehensive training activities to promote knowledge-sharing and skill development about DEXPLORE solutions for exploration of raw materials (KPI 16: at least 50 registrations to the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) including short training videos, documents, and quizzes). • Exploitation and techno-economic analysis (MNLT) (preliminary exploitation strategy (M4); market analysis including the identification of target clients; KPI 17: 1 for Terradat, 1 for Xcalibur, and 1 comprehensive one for a modular solution integrating project techniques; business plan highlighting the most valuable Key Exploitable Results). 1.1.2. DEXPLORE surpassing the state-of-the-art. Conducting mineral exploration in the modern context has led to numerous innovative approaches and new techniques (geophysical tools, geological mapping, and sampling), allowing fast and reliable mapping and predictive numerical modelling of resource probability and potential. Among these, a wide range of methods and technologies are used to advance towards the exploration and exploitation of deep land deposits and mineral resources. However, some of them still present some challenges for the detection of deep-seated deposits, and even more when complex geological context, such as the promising crystalline and metamorphic rocks, are targeted. With DEXPLORE innovations, our consortium is going further the state-of-the-art across the required different levels of information to arrive at the discovery of potential exploitable deep-seated resources of CRM/SRM at least up to 600 m (with potential for reaching 1,500 m depth in geophysical exploration) across well extended EU geological terrains such as the metamorphic basement considering both metallic and non-metallic materials (Table 2). Table 2. Summary of how DEXPLORE innovations surpass the state-of-the-art. State of the art technology Proposed DEXPLORE innovation DEXPLORE benefits Level 1 – Mineral models approach for deep-land exploitation of primary CRM * Geological data * Quantified and calibrated ore models * Updated methodology for developing ore * Conventional geochemical and using a combination of geophysical and mineral models mineralogical sampling and analysis techniques calibrated against * Rapidly and quantifiably assessment of characterization of samples recovered mineral resources over a range of scales by targeted drilling (TalTech, GSE)1. (100m2 to km2) * Be sufficiently accurate to yield a reliable assessment of grade and tonnage. * Increase cost effectiveness (x10) over the current state-of-the-art. Level 2 – Surface exploration – Remote sensing * Raman systems tested only in Development and demonstration of a * Remote application – drone compatibility, laboratory due to the large dimension novel remote field mineral detector as well as in-situ application with acquisition and weight of the prototypes2. combining advanced optical techniques times of a few seconds. These systems require spectrograph to (Raman, LIBS and fluorescence * Simultaneous acquisition of Laser-Induced assure high resolution and to permit to measurements) Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) spectra, span over a wide spectral range, based on filters and photodiode. Raman spectra, and luminescence data. resulting in large dimension and/or high (UNICA). * Raman signal with a high signal-to-noise costs. ratio (SNR) Also, the dispersion system is coupled * Minimal power consumption with CCD that often requires cooling to * Reduced risk of damaging the target increase efficiency decreasing the minerals with high-energy pulses thermal background. * Customized filters that permit to map only the selected mineral thanks to Raman spectrum (fingerprint of a material/mineral) Conventional hyperspectral and Advanced techniques for implementing * Application enabling large scale monitoring multispectral analysis using EO data EO based approaches for regional and and supporting the uptake of detailed spectral local mineral surface exploration information for mineral identification (ICCS)3. * Facilitates cost-effective mapping of resources of interest. Level 3 – Sub-surface exploration – Deep land geophysical exploration 1 Bidgood, Anna, and Murray Hitzman. New models to aid the discovery of critical raw material deposits for the Green Stone Age. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 526.1 (2023): 183-191. 2 Jill D. Pasteris, J.D., &Beyssac, O. (2020). Raman Spectroscopy in Earth and Planetary Sciences. April 2020 - Volume 16, Number 2 3 Peyghambari, S., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Hyperspectral remote sensing in lithological mapping, mineral exploration, and environmental geology: an updated review. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 031501 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 7  Gravity measurements are done today Novel geophysical drone-based Associated gravity *with Fastdocument Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 measurements using airplane or helicopter to ensure the measurement and the adjacent software * Increase precision: drone can fly lower and needed data precision and resolution. solutions (Xcalibur). explore more difficult areas However, this requirement regarding * Environmentally friendly surveys: Drone sensors transport increases the cost of can survey areas with significantly smaller the exploration campaigns and need a environmental impact and without using complex logistics. fossil fuels. * Cost effective: consume less tine and fuel. Active seismic acquisition is usually Avant-garde and standard seismic * Potential to provide very deep models applied to non-complex geological passive acquisition methodologies for depending on the geological configuration settings (e.g. sedimentary or slightly complex geological settings (up to 1,500m depth) with better logistics deformed rocks) by using seismic (metamorphic rocks, coexistence of [footprint (60% less), cost (up to 40% less), sources making the survey logistics metallic and nonmetallic targeted staff and equipment requirements (30% less)] intricate (high costs, environmental materials) based on the acquisition and compared to active surveys, since passive footprint) or even impossible4,5. Passive processing of ambient noise with a seismic acquisition does not require seismic surveys recently appeared. wireless seismic nodal system mobilization of big seismic sources. These do not include yet a global (TerraDat). * Seismic nodes can be deployed in difficult methodology for its usage under diverse access areas to increase the seismic data geological context nor for locating deep coverage (+45%). mineralization in complex terrains. Level 4 – GIS/VR platform visualization and exploitation 3D visualization methods are accessible XR application (in VR or AR/MR) will * Immersion and active participation via 2D interfaces6 potentially hindering ensure an intuitive platform enabling for * Social engagement and empowerment big data processing, visualization, and all stakeholders to immerse into the 3D * Stakeholder participation interaction. Few efforts have been done formations while sharing knowledge to offer visualization based on and data in real time as they collaborate, immersive technologies, however these navigate, and review all the 3D are still explored under theoretical components. Also, the development of a frameworks7. Engagement tools often mobile AR application will contribute to use methods that are nor inclusive the educational and acceptability neither accessible, nor do not support activities, while fostering a the long-run engagement of all citizens collaborative approach to sustainable with their heterogeneities8. exploration practices (ICCS). Level 1 – Mineral or ore models approach for deep-land exploitation of primary CRM The models provide a conceptual/exploration framework for how a particular type of deposit forms. Such models, which mirror a petroleum model approach9, focus on the sources of metals, their mobilization and transport, and their trapping at a specific location. Although there are a number of well-established ore deposit models, few have been developed for CRMs, since considered today as secondary or by-products from the production of metals such as aluminum, copper or nickel10. There has been even less research devoted to understanding if stand-alone CRM deposits may exist. Thus, the development of useful new ore deposit models requires cognizance of a broad range of geological processes as well as an understanding of the geochemistry of compositionally diverse dissolved metals at a wide range of temperature and pressure11. Geochemical data is critical in identifying anomalies of certain minerals associated with specific types of deposits and can indicate the presence of hidden mineralization beneath the surface. DEXPLORE innovation: With DEXPLORE project, we will conduct mineral systems research in Estonia (TalTech, GSE) to generate updated and new ore models for crystalline polymetallic formations that can be extrapolated and scaled to other localities and countries, pointing to increase the knowledge of the EU potential reserves of primary deep-seated CRM/SRM on this well-extended geological context across Europe. Also, the mineral systems of ATM and MINERSA mines will be updated using pre-existing information and the new data collected in Level 1 (WP2). Deep-seated crystalline and metamorphic polymetallic formations are a challenge for ore characterization and understanding: host rocks are highly deformed, and the mineralization is spread as dense and disseminated associations. The proper recording of resource distribution requires mechanical separation and multiple geochemical 4 Okada, K. (2020). A Historical Overview of the Past Three Decades of Mineral Exploration Technology. Natural Resources Research, 30(4), 2839–2860. 5 R., A., Zhostkov., D., A., Presnov., Andrey, S., Shurup., Andrey, S., Shurup., A., L., Sobisevich. (2017). Comparative study of deep structures by means of passive microseismic sounding and seismic tomography. Bulletin of The Russian Academy of Sciences: Physics, 81(1):64-67 6 Andersen, T. R., Poulsen, S. E., Pagola, M. A., & Medhus, A. B. (2020). Geophysical mapping and 3D geological modelling to support urban planning: A case study from Vejle, Denmark. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 180, 104130. 7 Wang, X., Guo, C., Yuen, D. A., & Luo, G. (2020). GeoVReality: A computational interactive virtual reality visualization framework and workflow for geophysical research. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 298, 106312. 8 Katika, Tina, et al. "Augmented reality (AR) supporting citizen engagement in circular economy." Circular Economy and Sustainability 2.3 (2022): 1077-1104. 9 Demaison, G., & Huizinga, B. J. (1991). Genetic classification of petroleum systems. AAPG bulletin, 75(10), 1626-1643. 10 Verplanck, P. L., & Hitzman, M. W. (2016). Rare earth and critical elements in ore deposits. Society of Economic Geologists. 11 Bidgood, Anna, and Murray Hitzman. New models to aid the discovery of critical raw material deposits for the Green Stone Age. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 526.1 (2023): 183-191. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 8  Associated analyses. In-situ techniques, such as EPMA, do not allow representative with document Ref. quantification, andAres(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 automated mineralogy involves the development of systematic databases to be functional. To meet these challenges, a novel image-based LA-ICP-MS technique applied to sulphides and garnets will be used for petrographic studies and quantification resources (TalTech). The method enables mineral species identification and clustering by integrating semi- quantification data via the stepwise and representative distribution of elements and will be applied to answer petrology and resources objectives (Fig. 2). When applying this technique, TalTech is facing a challenge: the scale. It will be necessary to define a sufficient number of samples to be analyzed and the limits of the conclusions obtained at the model scale (e.g. implement the data on the geophysical models). Fig. 2. Novel image-based LA-ICP-MS technique used for petrographic studies and quantification resources (TalTech). Thus, the development of a methodology for developing quantified and calibrated ore models using a combination of geophysical techniques calibrated against characterization of samples recovered by targeted drilling will be considered a breakthrough since it will allow for: a) rapidly and quantifiably assess mineral resources over a range of scales from hundreds of m2 to several km2; b) be sufficiently accurate to yield a reliable assessment of grade and tonnage; and c) be efficient and cost effective ca. ten times over the current state-of-the-art. Moreover, the GSE is making available the Geotek instrument that features an XRF (X-ray fluorescence) sensor, an infrared spectrophotometer, a camera, and a magnetic susceptibility sensor. This system allows for simultaneously capture of high-quality images of drill cores, analyze the chemical composition and magnetic susceptibility of rocks, and partially identify the minerals present. The resulting scans generate a substantial amount of data, which requires assessment against CRM mineralizing systematics. The data evaluation process involves a form of big data analysis, incorporating AI. This approach is innovative globally, and the extensive data GSE gathers provides a solid foundation for deep-seated ore body and ore occurrence exploration research. Level 2 – Surface exploration – Remote sensing In mineral exploration, remote sensing techniques are employed to identification, and assessment of mineral deposits at the surface and near-surface. The common remote sensing techniques utilized in mineral exploration range from satellite imagery, aerial photography, hyperspectral imaging, LIDAR, and thermal infrared imaging. Indeed, multispectral satellite sensors have been widely used for mineral exploration involving monitoring of important structural features or alterations that may be indicative of ore at depth. Band ratioing (BR) techniques, decorrelation stretching, saturation enhancement, and principal component analysis (PCA) are popular techniques. A major issue of broadband multispectral sensors is their insufficient spectral resolution to map minerals. Small bandwidths distinguish hyperspectral sensors, acquiring images containing hundreds of narrow contiguous spectral bands that provide near laboratory-quality spectra for every image pixel. Currently, knowledge-based methods, relying on spectral libraries to form the knowledge base for the characterization and mapping of materials are still widely used, although several Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) algorithms have been developed. Recent advances in hyperspectral sensing (e.g. EnMAP and PRISMA) can provide data with 30m spatial resolution and developments in drone technology indicate that UAVs can facilitate improved spatial resolution. On the other hand, the use of optical techniques like Raman LIBS and fluorescence are gaining increasing attention. Recent progress on compact and high-quality pulsed laser permitted the development of portable Raman systems able to work at long distance and in daylight. However, the actual technology has been tested only in laboratory due to the large dimension and weight of the prototypes. These systems require spectrographs to assure high resolution and to permit to span over a wide spectral range, resulting in large dimension and/or high costs. The dispersion system is coupled with CCD that often requires cooling accessories to increase efficiency decreasing the thermal background. DEXPLORE innovation: ICCS is bringing advanced techniques for boosting the implementation of EO based approaches for regional and local mineral surface exploration by applying multisensory data processing as well as the uptake of novel methods that will allow, though the spectral library, the efficient identification of minerals. The mapping of target CRM/SRM will be performed with knowledge-based and data-driven approaches and supported by DEXPLORE’s raw material spectral library. High spatial resolution multispectral data from Sentinel-2 mission, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 9  Associated with hyperspectral data from EnMAP and PRISMA missions, and hyperspectral document images Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 spectroscopy - 20/09/2024 data acquired by drones will be used for multiscale mineral exploration. Moreover, UNICA is proposing the development and demonstration of a novel optical system for remote detection of targeted minerals in-field by combining Raman, LIBS and Fluorescence designed to adjust excitation energy, ensuring a Raman signal with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), minimal power consumption, and reduced risk of damaging the target minerals (i.e., Fluorite (Fluorspar – CRM), Copper (SRM), Nickel (SRM), Manganese (SRM and CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM), Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), and Molybdenum (Mo)) with high-energy pulses. Further, since Raman spectrum represents the vibrational fingerprint of a mineral, the innovative idea can replace the spectrograph and large area CCD with customized filters that permit to map only the selected mineral. This approach will permit to decrease the weight and the dimension of the new device and to increase the measure sensitivity. The design of the prototype, prioritizing weight and dimension, will ensure its compatibility with drone integration enabling remote and in-situ applications. The system will simultaneously acquire Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBS) spectra, Raman spectra, and luminescence data. Operating at a working distance of 3 to 5 meters from the samples, the prototype will function under daylight conditions with acquisition times of a few seconds. Level 3 – Sub-surface exploration – Deep land geophysical exploration Geophysical exploration plays a crucial role in providing valuable information about what lies beneath the Earth’s surface without the need for drilling or excavation. By employing a range of methods that analyze the physical properties of rocks and minerals, a detailed picture of the subsurface can be obtained. This, in turn, guides decision- making throughout the exploration process, from selecting potential exploration sites to defining targets for drilling. Gravimetry surveys and seismic imaging present major applications when identifying and characterizing potential deep land mineral deposits due to their penetration depth. However, these methods still present drawbacks related not only to logistics and cost, but also to their application methodologies when it comes to exploration of deep-seated metallic and non-metallic deposits. Airborne survey: Gravimetry. Gravity measurements can help identify subsurface anomalies and geological structures related to denser mineral deposits. The depth of investigation in gravity surveys depends on the density contrasts in the subsurface. Stronger density anomalies (contrasts) lead to greater depths of detection. In ideal conditions, gravity surveys can detect variations at depths ranging from a few meters to several kilometers below the surface. The lateral resolution of gravity surveys can vary from tens of meters to several hundred meters (e.g. 12 ), depending on factors like survey equipment, station spacing, and the magnitude of the density contrasts. Vertical resolution is coarser than lateral resolution, varying from tens of meters to hundreds of meters, depending on the survey design and the depth of the source of density anomalies. Recent advancements in gravimetry includes: • Gradiometry surveys: Gradiometry involves measuring variations in the gradient of gravity. This technique is valuable for identifying subtle subsurface anomalies and can be especially useful in mineral exploration. • High-density grid surveys: Survey grids with closely spaced measurement points have become common, enabling the collection of detailed gravity data to identify smaller, deeper, or undiscovered mineral deposits. • Processing techniques: to delineate the edge position and to estimate the depth of a buried ore body. Gravimetry has been primarily used to find dense mineral deposits, such as lead or gold, and to map the subsurface geological structure, which might control the location of mineral deposits. However, it commonly requires the use of planes and helicopters for mounting heavy sensors, increasing logistics burden, costs, and environmental footprint. DEXPLORE innovation: Xcalibur is working on the development of an advanced unmanned aerial vehicle UAV airborne gravimetry. Affordable, high performance inertial navigation systems, their integration with GPS, and modern high performance airborne vertical sensors make UAV gravimetry an attractive and less expensive alternative to other methods for obtaining gravity data without losing data quality. In detail, Xcalibur UAV airborne scalar gravimeter system comprises an inertial measurement unit (with high resolution gyros and accelerometers) that acquires gravity data, under turbulent conditions, without requiring a stabilization platform. It is aimed at providing high-resolution (~1mGal at 500m) gravity data while a) reducing the data collection campaign costs in comparison to field and helicopter usage (<50%), b) offer a minimal environmental footprint reducing fuel spill risks, c) more energy efficiency, d) full-coverage of areas of interest including otherwise inaccessible areas, e) streamlined data collection, and f) adaptability to different environments. Careful planning, adherence to regulations, and considering potential environmental impacts are also essential for responsible and sustainable Xcalibur-guided exploration. Land- based survey: Seismic surveys: Active seismic, as seismic reflection, relies on the principle that different rock and mineral have distinct seismic properties (e.g. density, elastic characteristics). Active seismic involves the generation and transmission of sound waves (e.g. explosives, vibrators) into the subsurface where it is then refracted or reflected at the interface between rocks with different physical properties. The energy returning is recorded (i.e., geophones) and processed to create an acoustic image of the subsurface including composition, structure, and depth. 12 Elmas, A. (2019). Edge position detection and depth estimation from gravity data with application to mineral exploration. Carbonates and Evaporites, 34 . 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 10 The depth of penetration depends on the energy source used, the Associated frequencywith document content ofRef. theAres(2024)6673353 seismic waves, -and 20/09/2024 the velocity of the subsurface materials. Seismic reflection in oil and gas exploration have reached depths of 10 km or more. Deeper imaging often requires more powerful energy sources and low-frequency seismic waves, making the survey logistics a costly cumbersome process. Despite all the active seismic imaging advantages, this is most effective in areas with relatively straightforward geology (geological units showing low dips). In complex geological settings (high dips, deformed rocks), interpretation can be challenging, and the probability of target misidentification is high. The depth and resolution of the method are also limited, and it may not be suitable for identifying all types of mineral deposits. Moreover, logistics is an issue in remote areas or with dense vegetation (impossibility to mobilize big seismic sources). On the other side, passive seismic surges as a novel methodology which results depends on several factors such as the geological configuration (units or mineralization depth and thickness) and the seismic noise features of each area (frequency of the seismic signal, seismic waves propagation). Passive seismic includes the use of dozens of seismic nodes buried at similar spacing along lines or mesh, for acquiring noise during several hours or days. Despite of its advantages over the active seismic (e.g., less logistics complexity and cost), currently passive seismic does not include a global methodology for its usage in diverse geological contexts (including complex ones) and for locating deep-seated mineralization. Data collected in the presence of excessive noise (cultural noise or other) may result in sub-standard results due to low signal to noise ratios. This is the reason why, differently from oil and gas exploration, seismic surveys have not been commonly used in mineral exploration despite its ability to identifying deep- seated structures, especially in the case of small veins such as epithermal gold mineralization13,14,15. DEXPLORE innovation: TerraDat is developing an avant-garde passive seismic methodology that will be optimized for exploring deep-land metallic and non-metallic CRM/SRM deposits hosted in complex geological settings such as crystalline and metamorphic rocks and faulted or deformed units. Using a wireless seismic nodal system, TerraDat passive seismic survey will allow for reducing the logistics and the staff requirements in field, while minimizing costs and environmental footprint of the deep-seated mineral exploration. TerraDat’s seismic innovation will provide seismic models potentially up to 1500 m depth allowing for the identification of targeted mineralization (direct method), and/or characterize the main geological units and structures along which the mineralization can be found (indirect method). Terradat will then develop a standard seismic methodology optimized for the characterization of the different geological and mining environments set in DEXPLORE: non-metallic Fluorite mineralization along the planar contact of 2 different units and fault planes (MINERSA calibration pilot), metallic CRN/SRM materials disseminated across metamorphic rocks (ATM calibration and final Estonian pilots). This will be done by modeling critical aspects related to the acquisition and processing of the passive surveys in several geological contexts (i.e., sensor spacing, maximum seismic line length to evaluate the minimum resolution to locate and characterize the mineralization and geological features, time window acquisition to obtain reliable results considering the geological context, investigation depth, local seismic noise features, type of processing methods to obtain reliable seismic cross-sections). The final passive seismic methodology will be a guide for the seismic exploration of deep mineralization along the European territory. Level 4 – GIS/XR platform for data visualization and exploitation In the evolving landscape of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), the development of a robust system for managing a wide variety of connected devices, associated applications as well as a big amount of data is of paramount importance. Recent years have witnessed a growing recognition of the significance of modular systems, particularly in the context of process integration for various applications. While the literature has predominantly focused on specific areas like engineering design and industrial processes, there is an increasing need for a holistic approach that encompasses complex software modules, standards, and state-of-the-art methodologies16. Also, there is a need for implementation of a robust cloud middleware that serves as a reliable communication platform among heterogeneous components, data sources, and applications, facilitating seamless interactions among entities with even different interfaces, and operating systems17. In addition, this is supported by the fact that cloud computing not only provides a platform for storing, processing, and managing the IoT data but also enables IoT devices, connected factories, and data to be accessed, monitored, and managed remotely. The lack of a unified platform that can seamlessly integrate key industrial services, facilitate communication across all instances, and provide user-friendly access for analyzing and visualizing large datasets from a multitude of sources poses a significant challenge. This fragmentation impedes the widespread adoption of project solutions across industries, limiting their utility to isolated issues rather than being integral components of integrated interventions in the broader context of industrial processes and digital transformation. 13 Okada, K. (2021). A historical overview of the past three decades of mineral exploration technology. Natural Resources Research, 30, 2839-2860. 14 Maries, G., et. al.., 2017. Reflection seismic imaging of iron-oxide deposits: an example from Bergslagen mining district of Sweden. Near Surface Geoscience. 15 Markovic, M., et. Al., 2018. Deep targeting iron-oxide mineralization using reflection seismic method: A case study from the Ludvika Mines of Sweden. 16 2023: Cloud-Based Architecture for Production Information Exchange in European Micro-Factory Context 17 Cloud Computing Market Research Report … Global market for Cloud Computing from 2017-2022 with Market Forecasts From 2023-2030 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 11  Associated via with document 1 Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 On the other hand, current methods for 3D visualizations are accessible 2D interfaces that still pose- 20/09/2024 a few limitations that hinder the geophysical big data processing, visualization and interaction, as they require frequent insolvencies, and pose low satisfaction. A few efforts have been made to offer visualization frameworks based on immersive technologies. Preliminary investigation has demonstrated decrease in task complexity, lower user disruption, and ability to process more dimensional data, however, these efforts still explore the theoretical frameworks2. At the same time, engagement tools often use methods that are nor inclusive neither accessible, nor support the long-run engagement of all citizens with their heterogeneities3. DEXPLORE innovation: CORE will be focused on the development of an advanced cloud middleware infrastructure with a robust data warehouse to meet DEXPLORE project’s demands while going beyond the state of-the-art in addressing the complexities of nowadays data-driven decision-making landscapes. This solution is designed to efficiently manage, and process vast and diverse datasets generated during the associated mineral exploration processes. The technology drivers of CORE's solution include a range of high-performance hardware components and state-of-the-art technologies including e.g., Kubernetes, Docker Swarm. These components collectively create a scalable, reliable, and efficient cloud environment, capable of handling the complexities of big data. By including advanced data integration tools and implementing data governance frameworks, CORE's innovation enables the seamless aggregation, storage, and retrieval of diverse data types. This technology is a response to the pressing need for a secure infrastructure that can support data-intensive industries and facilitate data- driven decision-making. CORE's solution prioritizes data privacy and security, ensuring compliance with relevant regulations and industry standards to protect sensitive information. While building upon existing technologies, their application in the context of CRM/SRM exploration data management represents a novel approach. Furthermore, Xcalibur is adding innovation to the platform by incorporating 3D geological modeling, laying on its ability to enhance the understanding and management of underground minerals (T5.4). Primarily, the integration of a highly accurate and detailed 3D geological models into the platform will represent a significant leap forward in terms of spatial representation and understanding of subsurface structures. This innovation will go beyond the state- of-the-art by offering an unprecedented level of precision in depicting the complex geometries and distributions of mineral deposits in 3D while enabling a more realistic and comprehensive visualization, allowing a) stakeholders to make informed decisions based on a deeper understanding of the subsurface dynamics and b) a better understanding of complex technical information for the general public. Furthermore, the 3D modeling will extend the platform innovation by allowing for predicting and highlighting areas of interest with high degree of accuracy. By leveraging advanced algorithms, the model could analyze vast datasets and identify subtle patterns indicative of rich mineral concentrations. This predictive capability will go beyond conventional methods, enabling more targeted and efficient exploration strategies, ultimately optimizing resource utilization. In addition, ICCS is bringing Extended Reality (XR) for 3D visualizations (T5.5) and social engagement (T6.3). An XR application (in VR or AR/MR) will ensure an intuitive platform enabling for all stakeholders to immerse into the 3D formations while they share knowledge and data in real time as they collaborate, navigate and review all the 3D components in real time. In addition, the development of a mobile AR application will contribute to educational and acceptability activities, while fostering a collaborative approach to sustainable exploration practices. 1.1.3. TRL description - Idea to Application This section is focused on the technology development across DEXPLORE project which is basically concentrated at Level 2 devoted to Remote sensing techniques, Level 3 Sub-surface exploration – Deep land geophysical exploration, and Level 4 – GIS/VR platform for data visualization and exploitation. Level 2 – Surface exploration – Remote sensing UNICA research group has outstanding experience in optical spectroscopy and Raman, as proved by ca. 200 scientific publications (see Part A). Within the project Raman4Cov (funded by Sardegna Ricerche), UNICA has developed an initial portable prototype able to selectively identify viruses by using a set of filters tailored on the specific Raman spectrum. The prototype works at few cm with continuous laser as excitation source (TRL4, Fig. 3). Apart of the medical and pharmaceutical fields, this advanced optical system has potential application in new in-situ mineral exploration techniques, Fig. 3. Initial prototype of the novel forensic (identification of illegal drugs and explosives), among others. For remote field mineral detector combining DEXPLORE application in the exploration of CRM/SRM, UNICA should advanced optical techniques: Raman, define a new suitable optical setup (telescope based), vary the excitation LIBS, and fluorescence measurements. mode (from continuous to pulsed), expand the prototype application to few meters and work under normal daylight, and tailor the specific Raman spectrum to the targeted CRM/SRM (i.e., Fluorite (Fluorspar – CRM), Cu (SRM), Nil (SRM), Mn (SRM and CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM), Zn, Pb, and 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 12 Mo). Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 On the other hand, ICCS is specialized in designing EO based services for mineral exploration and CRM spectral library. Today, they count on a solution that utilizes EO data and ML based techniques for resource mapping and identification. In the context of DEXLORE, ICCS will implement a service reaching TRL5 while exploiting knowledge-based and data-driven approaches and supported by the project’s raw material spectral library. Level 3 – Sub-surface exploration – Deep land geophysical exploration Developing UAVs with gravimeter sensors is an area of ongoing research and innovation at Xcalibur. From the sensor point of view, Xcalibur engineers are working on developing smaller and more lightweight gravimeter sensors suitable for drone applications (TRL3). This is crucial for integrating the sensor with drone platforms, which also involves addressing issues related to power consumption, data transmission, and sensor calibration. In this context, Xcalibur is using advancements in real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS and other positioning technologies to contribute to improved accuracy. From the data processing and analysis point of view, the data collected by the gravimeter sensor have required the processing and analysis to extract meaningful information. This involves sophisticated algorithms and software tools to filter out noise, correct drone movements, and interpret gravity variations (TRL3). In summary, Xcalibur’s development of gravimeter-equipped drones is focused on improving power constraints, precision and sensitivity of the gravimeter, and data integration with other geospatial information. Regarding the land-based geophysical exploration, TerraDat as leading geophysical company with experience in seismic methods, has been working in collaboration with the universities of Oviedo (Spain) and Potsdam (Germany) on the developed of seismic noise survey methodologies at two scales: i) near surface applied to commercial projects (up to 80 m depth), and ii) in crustal structure studies (up to 20 km depth18). Today, Terradat has the knowledge and the resources to apply the seismic noise method to deep mineral exploration up to 1,500 m depth (TRL4, Fig. 4). It is still needed to calibrate and optimize the method to provide high quality deep-land exploration, capable of locating DEXPLORE target mineralizations and key geological features. Fig. 4. Examples of 1) seismic velocity slices at several depths, and 2) seismic velocity cross-sections Teradata’s researchers will check and adjust the processing and obtained when using the seismic noise methodology inversion algorithms used at other scales to define the best under developed at TerraDat. methodology for the deep mining study set in DEXPLORE. Level 4 – GIS/VR platform for data visualization and exploitation During the last 2 years, CORE has been working on the development of a scalable cloud middleware with data warehouse management for their expert solutions to the industry. Today, having a general architecture design and a clear idea about the configuration and parameters to be included in the middleware, it is at TRL3. Different European projects such as MASTERMINE, TERRAVISION, CARDIMED, have allowed the current development. CORE's platform/cloud middleware transcends data fragmentation by providing a unified architecture capable of harmonizing disparate datasets (sensor data, log files, time series, semi-structured data like XML and JSON, ML data, etc.) from multiple projects, in-situ measurements, and other sources. It offers integrated services across various backends, enabling seamless communication between systems and simplifying the visualization of complex services through customizable dashboards. Moreover, it will actively monitor associated operations, measure and store data, control processes based on predefined criteria, and support optimization to continually improve system performance. Flexibility and interoperability (HTTP/HTTPS, REST, MQTT, OPC-UA, etc.) are central to the platform/middleware, for accommodating heterogeneous nature of the IoT and IIoT. Maintenance practices like update, monitoring, alerting, and backup is another critical aspect, with well-defined procedures and infrastructure in place to respond swiftly to failures, ensuring system reliability and resilience. Security remains crucial within CORE's platform, with comprehensive measures addressing confidentiality and integrity. Through these advanced capabilities, CORE's platform/solution stands at the forefront of modern middleware and data warehouse management, poised to revolutionize data-driven decision-making in the digital age. ICCS has been working on improving the public’s awareness of and engagement with sustainable practices as a key factor for the transition towards a circular economy (CE) by investigating the ability of augmented reality (AR) to improve awareness of CE practices and to engage citizens. Specifically, ICCS report on the development of a novel AR engagement tool under the frame of two studies using this tool to assess the reliability and validity of engagement practice3. The first study focuses on the citizens of a municipality in Greece, and the second on the general public outside the municipality boundaries. Attributes related to user engagement, such as novelty, aesthetics, perceived 18 Acevedo, Jorge, et al. "Ambient noise tomography of the southern sector of the Cantabrian Mountains, NW Spain." Geophysical Journal International 219.1 (2019): 479-495. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 13  Associatedand usability, endurability, focused attention, self-efficacy, perceived learning, withinterest documentinRef. theAres(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 topic, were assessed, as were factors affecting these attributes related to the participants’ knowledge of CE principles and exposure to similar technologies. The two studies indicate that the AR engagement tool increased social inclusion and community cohesion and was able to successfully bring CE principles and benefits to the public’s attention. Moreover, ICCS also is exploiting Extended and Mixed Reality (X -MR) applications for immersive visualizations as well as fostering engagement of stakeholders in different industrial settings19. Mixed Reality (MR) applications allow the execution of context-aware applications with advanced interaction interfaces improving decision making, data gathering, interoperability with other services, accessibility, and real-time data sharing. When doing so, an MR enabler has been designed and developed to collect data from various sources of such ecosystems. At the same time, the MR enabler allows the visualization of BIM models, their digital representations and data, as well as the submission of reports. In the construction site application, for instance, the main objectives are to identify workers in large construction sites and their medical and training records, get real-time information regarding their stress and health levels, and alert when dangerous activity is being performed, or a worker reaches an unauthorized location. 1.2 Methodology Our DEXPLORE consortium will arrive to a complete package of innovations from surface to subsurface level to arrive at a versatile visualization and exploration tool for advancing on mapping the European potential of primary CRM/SRM at least up to 600 m depth, by focusing on wide extended geological terrains with promising possibilities for hosting these materials. This will be done through eight work packages (see Sect. 3.1) as follow: (WP2) Level 1 - Mineral/ ore system approach to boost the exploration of primary CRM. The CRM/SRM research will include analysis of historical geological data as well as new experimental work to better constrain the geochemical behavior of CRMs across a range of physio-chemical conditions. The abundance of metamorphic rocks (Fig. 5) and the relative lack of knowledge of the behavior of CRMs in these environments suggests that it may be a fruitful topic of study. It is important to note that recent compilations of data on mineral occurrences and historic mines, such as the GeoERA and Mintell4EU projects completed by European Geological Surveys, do provide a firm foundation for the potential development of new ore deposit models in areas such as metamorphic terranes. Fig. 5. Global lithological map database (GLiM) (Hartmann and Moosdorf 2012) with the distribution of metamorphic rocks exposed at the Earth's surface, including shales to gneisses and amphibolites to quartzites. This does not include weakly metamorphosed or foliated rocks, greenstone belts or ophiolites which are instead classified by their parent lithologies as described in Hartmann and Moosdorf (2012). Major mineral deposits of the world are plotted as circles with metamorphic deposits plotted as green triangles. Metamorphic deposits are classified in this database as rocks that are subjected to higher T and P and are distinct from hydrothermal deposits, regardless of the P–T conditions experienced during hydrothermal activity. For example, orogenic gold deposits are classified as hydrothermal. The distribution and occurrence of metamorphic rocks and deposits shown on this figure are therefore underrepresented and considered as a minimum. During the DEXPLORE project our attention regarding new ore and mineral models for deep-land CRM and SRM deposits will then be focused on Eastern Europe. Across the Estonian Precambrian basement there is a promising geological context for deep-seated primary CRM/SRM –metamorphic basement with abundant sulphides (pyrite, pyrrhotite, sphalerite, galena and others) covered by a 100 m to 780 m -thick sedimentary sequence (TalTech, GSE). 19 Exploiting Mixed Reality in a Next-Generation IoT ecosystem of a construction site, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST); https://doi.org/10.1109/IST55454.2022.9827726 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 14 In detail, at the NE of Estonia there is the Precambrian basement,Associated with document an extension Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 of the Fennoscandian - 20/09/2024 Shield's rock complexes mirroring the geological structures and metallogenic features in Southern Finland and South-Central Sweden. In this area of Estonia, two significant basement complexes with prominent metalliferous anomalies have been discerned, the Alutaguse and Jõhvi Fig. 6. NE Estonia showing the location complexes (Fig. 6). According to recent and of the Alutaguse and Jõhvi complexes. exhaustive geochemical surveys supported by historical geological and geophysical studies, the Alutaguse and Jõhvi zones have shown high anomaly concentrations of CRM, particularly Cu, Zn and magnetite for Fe resources. Additionally, Mn and Mo are present in relatively significant concentrations. High Cu- Pb-Zn concentrations are often related to gneisses that contain graphite. Notably, recent public investigations into carbon (C) concentrations in this area are lacking, indicating a potential area for further research. These formations resemble to the deposits in the Bergslagen ore provinces of Sweden and potentially, those in the Orijärvi region of Southern Finland. Preliminary data indicates that the concentrations of rare earth elements (REEs) in Alutaguse's metavolcanics and metasediments are higher than those in the Southern Finland. Nevertheless, Rapakivi intrusions, particularly the Marjamaa body, could also be an interesting zone for CRM. The latter area has not been properly studied yet, presenting a promising opportunity for further exploration of deep-seated primary CMR. Fortunately, there is highly valuable pre-existing geological information acquired by the GSE about the Precambrian basement of NE Estonia, particularly on the targeted Alutaguse and Jõhvi complexes. There is a significant number of available drill cores (ca. 50), including two new (2019-2020) drill cores reaching several iron and sulphide mineralization. Also, data regarding geochemistry, limited petrophysics, geophysical surveys such as magnetometric and gravimetrical maps, as well as raw material are available. The further exploration and geological characterization of the Estonian Precambrian basement will start with the collection and integration of all available information to assess the state of knowledge and its potential gaps (T2.1). This will lead to the conception of the first systematic geochemical and petrophysical dataset and complementary analyses for the Estonian Basement. To fill the lack of systematic data, drill core profiles will be scanned by GeoTek core scanner, portable XRF where needed or Hyperspectral instrument for the targeted CRM and SRM (GSE, T2.3). The data will be integrated into the dataset that later will feed the visualization platform (WP5). Moreover, the Estonian basement characterization will include a) geophysical data, including previous magnetic and gravimetric analyses, b) XRF, XRD, and ICP-MS data, d) in-situ SEM and LA-ICP-MS analyses. The second part of this work will concern the characterization of minerals themselves. In-situ textural analysis will be conducted to identify elemental distribution (EPMA, EDS, LA- ICP-MS), related trends and metamorphic systems evolution. With the aim of further advance on the recognition of the European potential for hosting deep-seated CRM/SRM up to 600m depth, the ore system approach will be extended towards Swedish and Finnish metamorphic formations carrying out a comparison of geochemical and petrophysics data from Estonia and the Nordics countries. Development of models will enable the understanding of enriched models and the deposits characteristics. Clustering based on localities, metamorphic formations and petrology will then be employed to build statistical models. Objectives will focus on quantification and to deliver mineral models for targeted settings/minerals. TalTech will finally arrive at an early ore model by M24 (T2.5), which will be subsequently updated once counting on the data coming from the validation pilot (WP6) with the support of GSE and the other partners proving new data by using DEXPLORE technology development for remote sensing, geophysical surveys, and data processing. (WP3) Level 2 - Remote Sensing for surface exploration: Implementation of EO based approaches for regional and local mineral surface exploration will be done by using multispectral and hyperspectral sensors of a wide range of spatial resolutions (ICCS, T3.1). The mapping of the target CRM/SRM will be performed with knowledge- based and data-driven approaches and supported by the project’s raw material spectral library. The EO analysis will exploit the latest improvements in the spatial resolution of multispectral and hyperspectral satellite sensors in regional mineral exploitation. Specifically, Sentinel-2 multispectral sensor provides data with spatial resolutions of 10, 20 and 60 m and multiple bands in the 0.4-2.4 μm wavelength region, and a higher temporal frequency (at least once per 5 days for a large part of the global land surface) which enables regular monitoring of regions of interest. A higher spectral resolution, which is beneficial for most mineral exploration applications, can be obtained from the newly launched hyperspectral sensors EnMAP and PRISMA, which provide data at 30m spatial resolution. To overcome limited spatial resolution, the PRISMA mission has been designed to simultaneously acquire hyperspectral and panchromatic images, which are then used to create pansharpened hyperspectral images with a spatial resolution of 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 15 5 meters. The areas identified as potential mineralization areas willAssociated with document be surveyed Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 with drones - 20/09/2024 carrying hyperspectral cameras to define target locations for further exploration. Additionally, a robust spectral library with reference spectral signatures from target minerals will be developed (T3.3) and used as a reference for the identification of the spectra collected at the testing sites with the Raman-LBIS- fluorescence-prototype (UNICA) and remote sensing sensors. Improvements in the realization of spectral signatures will be facilitated by using hyperspectral cameras deployed in-situ. Novel deep learning architectures will be employed, enabling accurate identification and quantification of minerals. In parallel, UNICA will work on the development of the novel remote field mineral detector combining RAMAN Spectroscopy, LIBS and fluorescence techniques mounted in a UAV (T3.2). This prototype aims to strongly increase remote mineral detection by offering improved efficiency, selectivity, and adaptability. Several parameters will be optimized and tested during DEXPLORE, including: • Excitation Source: A Q-switched Nd-Laser will be employed for time-resolved measurements. Two different excitations will be tested: IR excitation (1064 nm) to minimize luminescence signals and visible source (532 nm) to increase the cross-section of scattered light. • Optical Setup: Optimization will focus on achieving a high Signal/Noise ratio, large working distance, and stability. A telescope with a large diameter coupled with a sizable optical bundle will capture the signal. The geometry of the collected signal, utilizing backscattering and tilted configurations, will be analyzed for S/N signal optimization. • Detector: A compact spectrograph coupled to an intensified CCD will enable the acquisition of entire spectra over a wide range (100 – 4000 cm-1). As an alternative, a set of customized filters will replace the spectrograph, and a photodiode will substitute the CCD array, capturing only the typical bands of selected minerals (e.g. sulfide, pyrite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite). This approach will significantly increase the Signal-to-Noise Ratio, and the use of a fast photodiode will allow operation in the nanosecond time domain to capture Raman features. For doing so, UNICA will divide the technical development into different step across WP3 and 6: a. Acquisition of pulsed Raman spectra of target samples at different working distances ranging from 1 to 3 meters in laboratory. b. Definition of the optical set-up for a compact system c. Building of the prototype and test in laboratory (TRL 4) d. Test of the optical technique and set up outside the labs on selected minerals (TRL 5 at WP6) (WP4) Level 3: Geophysical techniques for deep land exploration: The geophysical techniques and tools that will be developed and optimized during DEXPLORE are targeting deep-land deposits located at least up to 600 m depth. To reach such as deep in an efficient and sustainable manner, two innovative geophysical methods are considered: Xcalibur will advance on the development of the first European unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry (T4.1) by optimizing a UAV scalar gravity system capable of measuring 1mGal at wavelength sof 500m. The main challenges to be faced, in order to achieve the desired resolution, include (1) coupling the sensor and the UAV, considering the lever-arm effect of the relative positioning of the GNSS and the IMU, (2) flying: small line spacing at low speeds, and (3) data processing: filtering, down-sampling IMU raw data considering coning and sculling, and adapting a direct approach (from i-frame to n-frame) or/and an indirect-approach (using kalman filters to fuse IMU and GNSS data). Data processing, analysis, navigation, surveying, guidance, and stabilization will be also considered. After advancing on the technical development, the next step will be the calibration of the UAV gravity system in two different geological settings represented by the two calibration pilots described below. In turn, TerraDat will optimize its passive seismic methodology based on the use of seismic noise for modeling deep-seated CRM/SRM deposits (T4.2). The first step includes the modeling related to the acquisition parameters in the different contexts set at DEXPLORE pilots (WP4 and WP6). The second step includes the calibration of the seismic method in two different geological settings represented by the two calibration pilots described below. In both pilots TerraDat is proposing a) the optimization of the geometry of the seismic nodes to reach the target depth with enough resolution to identify the mineralization and/or geological structures that generate it. In this case, different sensor spacing will be analyzed to evaluate the minimum resolution to characterize the mineralization and geological features. The maximum seismic line length, critical aspect to reach the target depth. b) the optimization of the seismic recording time needed to obtain reliable results. This time depends on several factors, such as the type of seismic noise in each area, or the investigation depth. In this case, it is proposed to evaluate seismic acquisitions during 5 to 20 days, to identify the optimal time window necessary to obtain high-resolution seismic models of the terrain. c) data processing and inversion is another critical aspect that influences the detection capacity of the method. TerraDat will test various types of processing and at least two inversion algorithms to obtain reliable terrain models. All the information obtained from the modeling and pilots will be implemented in a global methodology which will include guidelines for successfully passive surveys in different geological contexts. Regarding the calibration pilots, these correspond to two small mining areas (ca. 10-20 km2), still significant to obtain 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 16  reliable geophysical data for the targeted depth of up to 600 m inAssociated Westernwith document Europe Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 comprising - 20/09/2024 metallic and non- metallic minerals with different mineralization configuration, to guarantee that the geophysical innovations reach the set KPIs. Since not all remote sensing and geophysical methods are equally effective in all geological settings, we have selected two interesting areas in Spain with specific mineralization features that will allow us to calibrate the geophysical technologies: dissemination – Cu and associated minerals ATM, and along planar structures – Fluorite MINERSA. The selected mines count on well-structured geochemical, petrophysical, core drilling information, and even a developed ore model (e.g. MINERSA counts on >500 borehole logs providing detailed stratigraphic and structural knowledge of the Permo-Jurassic Asturias Basin; >1000 geochemical analyses on core samples from drill holes and mine allowing for mapping the distribution of mineralization elements in the different deposits), so they are the perfect scenario for running initial validation tests of the airborne and land-based techniques optimized into the frame of DEXPLORE, before to jump into the final validation along the NE of Estonia where new areas or areas with outdated mineral models will be studied. a) Cu (SRM), Nickel (SRM), Zinc (Zn) mine (South of Spain): 0 Located on the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Devonian), Masa Valverde 300 deposit up to 900 m depth (ATM, Fig. 7) is embedded in 600 900 volcanic- and sediment-hosted massive sulphide (VSHMS) - Fig. 7. Masa Valverde mining (ATM) - pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena and cassiterite. calibration pilot. Localization and cross-section. Mineralization occurs as dissemination of metallic minerals. Recently, 3 main geophysical surveys have been completed by ATM (airborne VTEM, FLEM-Squid and airborne gravity AGG) leading to the discovery and delineation of a new massive sulphide orebody, the Majadales deposit, 1km east to Masa Valverde. ATM foresees to find continuity between both deposits at depth, however, the difficulty and highly expensive drilling methods to approach these targets in depth is a key challenge in mineral exploration. DEXPLORE new technological exploration methods will confirm ATM’s suspect about the mineral expansion while making an improvement in the knowledge at regional and deposit scales. b) Fluorite (Fluorspar - CRM) mine (North of Spain) Fig. 8: Asturian fluorite deposits are located within the Mesozoic basin, and the strata bound mineralisation occurs as open-space fillings and as replacement of the limestone host rock, 3-15 m thick, in the proximity of the base of the Triassic succession (mainly marls, shales and siltstones), ca. 250-300 m thick. Extensional faults feed the host rock. The deposits are a good example of epigenetic Mississippi Valley type MVT. Conventional geophysical exploration is not applicable as common base metals of MVT deposits are absent. However, since the mineralisation is fracture-related (up to 50-70 m from the faults) and also occurs in the vicinity of the basin margins, the use of geophysical techniques for the detection of these structures (impossible to identify at the surface due to the absence of outcrops) is of key importance in the exploration of these deposits at depths >500 m, providing support for a rational planning of future drilling. Over the last two decades, MINERSA has carried out an intensive prospection by drilling boreholes on the stratigraphic succession. It is possible to obtain both geophysical and geochemical parameters of the whole sequence, which allow the measurement of density, conductivity, etc. prior to the application of indirect prospective methods. 0 In both pilots TerraDat and Xcalibur aim to run surveys focused on the identification of mineralization while evaluating main geological 250 units and structures. The surveys will include a seismic line and a 500 UAV gravity flight, where several aspects related to the acquisition Fig. 8. Asturian fluorite deposits (MINERSA) - and processing will be evaluated for optimizing the seismic calibration pilot. Localization and cross-section. exploration. (WP5) Level 4: GIS Platform for data visualization, 3D geological modeling and technical/society interaction thanks to XR capabilities. This platform (CORE), with powerful 3D graphics (Xcalibur) and extended reality (XR) capabilities (ICCS), will integrate the different information levels allowing for data exploitation and integration. The end-users will have access to an XR application retrieving information from the platform and visualizing 3D models and other relevant data. Using XR the end-users will be immersed into the content, where manipulation mechanisms and object detection algorithms will improve positional awareness of the visualization process. With its cloud middleware, CORE will transcend data fragmentation by providing a unified architecture capable of harmonizing datasets (e.g. sensor data, log files, time series, semi-structured data like XML and JSON, ML data) 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 17 from multiple information levels, in-situ measurements, and other Associated sourceswith document (T5.1 Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 to T5.3). - 20/09/2024 Notably, the technical partners will be actively engaged from the requirements phase (T5.1), shaping together the platform's user interface (React JS, Figma, etc.) and interaction paradigms. CORE will also add integrated services to the platform across various backends, enabling seamless communication between systems and simplifying the visualization of complex geological information through customizable dashboards. Moreover, CORE will work on actively monitor associated operations, measure and store data, control processes based on predefined criteria, and support optimization to continually improve the system performance. Flexibility and interoperability (HTTP/HTTPS, REST, MQTT, OPC- UA, etc.) are central to the middleware, for accommodating heterogeneous nature of the IoT and IIoT. Maintenance practices like update, monitoring, alerting, and backup is another critical aspect, with well-defined procedures and infrastructure in place to respond swiftly to failures, ensuring system reliability and resilience. Security remains crucial within the platform, with comprehensive measures addressing confidentiality and integrity. XCalibur – T5.4. GIS analysis and Integration of data and derived products aid exploration studies by supplying plenty of information that supports fieldwork and the subsequent mineral exploration and exploitation steps. The modeling process involves clear objective definition, comprehensive data acquisition, interpretation, and conceptualization, followed by software selection and model construction. Through iterative refinement and validation, the model’s accuracy will be ensured, enabling visualization and analysis for valuable insights. ICCS – T5.5. Moreover, the incorporation of XR for directing the platform to improving the awareness of the general public and stakeholders across the EU about the importance of raw materials for a successful transition to a climate- neutral and the need for a secure, sustainable, and responsibly sourced supply of raw materials will be key. While XR offers geoscientists incredible options to enrich their ability to visualize the nuances of rock formations, it also presents excellent possibilities to bring closer geological and complex information to the general public. To do so, ICCS will use recent advances in XR headset technology (e.g. Hololens 2, Apple vision pro) and specialized software such as depth sensors and tracking functionalities to make it easier to capture, visualize, and interact with geology in 3D. The application will support visualization of large structures and near real-time data exchange, and will be coupled with algorithms to achieve complex dataset monitoring and enable object recognition to provide the user with situational awareness. Also, an XR application will be designed and developed for the visualization of the 3D geological models. The application will be made available in Head Mounted Devices for selected stakeholders and the possibility of extending the capabilities to a lighter version for smartphone devices will also be explored. The mobile AR application will be designed to be utilized by all pilot stakeholders. The end-users will get access to this application offering virtual interaction approaches as well as educational and gamification features to enhance their engagement and understanding on the matters that DEXPLORE deals. Finally, evaluation functionalities will be implemented to assess the performance and user adoption to optimize social engagement practices. (WP6) Final in-field technology validation. For confirming that the technology developed through DEXPLORE project is optimal for running initial exploration stages, we planned a final validation pilot in NE Estonia led by GSE. This WP6 starts with the collection on the interest area (T6.1) defined in base of information coming from WP2 (boreholes, petrophysical and available geophysics) and will be focused on the identification of the target deep-seated mineralization - Copper (SRM), Nickel (SRM), Manganese (SRM and CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM) as well as Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), and Molybdenum (Mo) - and or geological features critical for the development of high grade mineralization. Firstly, comprehensive remote sensing exploration (ICCS, UNICA) will take place to direct the geophysical exploration over the most promising area. After that UAV gravimetric data will be collected over the target area and processed to eliminate noise, enhancing signals related to subsurface density variations (Xcalibur). The preliminary results of the gravimetric survey will guide the seismic noise survey towards key areas needing detailed exploration where a study line will be deployed (TerraDat). Each remote sensing and geophysical dataset will be interpreted to identify mineralization, or geological features critical in the development of mineralized areas (T6.2). The identification of density anomalies in the processed UAV gravimetry data is crucial for indicating potential mineral deposits, including copper (Cu), magnetite for iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), and molybdenum (Mo). The next step will involve integrating gravimetric data with existing geological maps and information, enabling a correlation between density anomalies, and known geological features. Particularly, the correlation between high lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), and copper (Cu) concentrations and the presence of graphitic gneisses will be explored. Cross- verification with data from other geophysical methods, such as magnetic or electromagnetic surveys, will be employed to refine interpretations and enhance the accuracy of mineral mapping. Additionally, recent public investigations into carbon (C) concentrations are taken into consideration. The findings from these investigations will be integrated into the analysis to assess how carbon concentrations correlate with or influence the identified density anomalies and mineralization patterns. This comprehensive approach will help to build a more nuanced understanding of the geological context and potential mineral resources. Following the identification of anomalies, resource estimation will be conducted, considering factors such as depth, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 18 volume, and grade of the mineral deposits. The gravimetric and passive Associated with document seismic data willRef. be Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 crucial in estimating the size and potential economic viability of mineral resources below 600 m depth. Environmental considerations are also paramount, evaluating the potential impact of mining activities in the identified areas, with specific attention to recent investigations into carbon concentrations and other environmental concerns. Interpretation results will be compiled into a comprehensive report that includes maps, cross-sections, resource estimates, and a detailed interpretation of the findings. Finally, all the information and interpretation will be integrated into the Visualization and Exploitation platform to enrich the resource assessment, and to arrive at a reliable geological and mining model for the Precambrian metamorphic basement of NE Estonia with the leadership of TalTech and the GSE, in collaboration with the technical partners involved in the exploration stage. Comparison of the finalized mineralization model with known ore areas in Southern Finland and Bergslagen in Sweden will expand the knowledge about the potential of deep-seated CRM/SRM for advancing toward the green transition. Using the results of the data collection and interpretation campaigns, a finetuning stage of DEXPLORE technology will be developed (T6.4). In addition, this work package includes the validation of the Visualization and Exploitation platform to pursue the Social License to Operate. To do so, educational and acceptability activities involving the general public and relevant stakeholders such as other geological services (e.g. Geological surveys of Finland, Sweden, Lithuania) and regulatory authorities are planned (T6.3). (WP7) LCA & Environmental Assessment: DEXPLORE will follow a robust methodology for the multidisciplinary assessment of the technologies developed within the project, leading to a comprehensive evaluation of their impact on the environment as whole, as well as the local communities affected. This includes Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC) studies, using the most up-to-date data with regards to current state-of-the-art exploration technologies as a benchmark and presenting the benefits offered by the DEXPLORE technologies. A thorough data collection step is required prior to the analyses, which will aid in defining their framework. In particular, the goal and scope of the assessments will be clearly defined, including the system(s) to be studied, alternative scenarios and/or configurations, system boundaries, time horizon for assessment of the investigated technology, functional unit(s) per system, most relevant indicators and life cycle impact assessment methods to be applied, and the development of the LCI template for data compilation. The LCA will be performed using the SimaPro and GaBi software packages and will consider all the phases of the lifecycle (i.e., from the cradle to the grave), following the guidelines of ISO 14040 and 14044 standards. The LCI will be prepared, collecting information on various inputs and outputs of each technology, in direct collaboration with the technical partners developing said technology. These will be processes with updated Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) methods to quantify the absolute impact of each DEXPLORE technology and identify potential environmental hotspots, considering a comprehensive list of environmental indicators (e.g. carbon and water footprint, particular matter formation, cumulative energy demand). Results compared to the baseline LCA, to demonstrate the substantial improvements DEXPLORE offers over the current state of the art. Through the LCC analysis, the economic implications and opportunities will be addressed, providing valuable information to guide the development of an economically viable exploration suite. Thus, it will lead to a descriptive report including capital expenses, operational and end-of-life costs, based on bill of quantities, equipment lists, and operational parameters, along with suggestions for optimization, where relevant. As such, it will allow the early quantification of the potential large-scale environmental and financial impacts of DEXPLORE, along with the exploitation activities. In the S-LCA, the social and sociological impacts of DEXPLORE will be evaluated, analyzing the actual and potential positive and negative impacts along the life cycle of each technology (using a time horizon of 5, 25 and 30) years. Using both generic and site-specific data from the pilot regions, found in the literature or generated through the project, societal impacts will be examined, including the societal impact a stronger, more resilient and autonomous CRM supply chain can affect, in particular by safeguard the European Industrial sector. In order to achieve this, elements such as the exploration, extraction and processing of raw materials, the manufacturing and distribution of end products, their life cycle and opportunities for re-use or recycling will be painstakingly considered. (WP8) Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and Clustering: ISMC, in collaboration with all consortium members, will spearhead the management of WP8, focusing on stakeholder involvement through comprehensive dissemination and communication activities, clustering initiatives, and a robust training and knowledge program. Recognizing the societal importance of raw materials and the imperative to enhance acceptance of sustainable raw materials production in the EU, the dissemination strategy of DEXPLORE will gain paramount significance. One of DEXPLORE's primary objectives is to fortify the connection between exploration activities and society, educating the public about emerging exploration technologies and the potential benefits for EU regions. WP8 will also serve to amplify the project's outcomes among potential users and key stakeholders, generating a multiplier effect. To achieve this, three clustering events will be organized by ICAMCyL and ISMC in collaboration with relevant 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 19 projects and organizations. These events aim to foster synergies andAssociated with document initiatives across Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 various - 20/09/2024 domains, including policies, regulations, standards, and data dissemination. DEXPLORE Advisory Board (AB) (T8.4), based on relevant connection of the consortium partners and directed to increase the EU resilience in raw materials supply chains while reducing the serious risks to the Union’s strategic assets, economic and societal interests, autonomy, and security associated with the current EU reliance on a few third countries for CRM. DEXPLORE AB includes relevant stakeholders from Europe, Africa and Latin America, ensuring presence of countries signing strategic partnerships on raw materials with the EU (Fig. 9). Interaction and mutual reinforcement will be ensured with the S3P-Industry platform “Mining Industry”, where project partners have leadership roles. To do so, ISMC and ICAMCyL will set up meetings and an online workspace. Further, a mirroring strategy will be applied in order to identify regions and industrial players interested in the KERs and/or in replicating best practices from the project case-studies, potentially aligning the Smart Specialization Strategies of the participant regions and fostering transnational and Fig. 9. DEXPLORE Advisory Board. interregional innovation and business opportunities. An international workshop, also involving key stakeholders, will be organised and followed by a compilation of recommendations and findings, portraying the identified needs and challenges. The aim is to formulate a roadmap for common actions that addresses the evolving landscape of exploration technologies. Moreover, DEXPLORE is committed to developing comprehensive training activities. These will encompass short training videos, webinars, and guidelines, all integrated into a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) to facilitate remote learning and capacity building. This multifaceted approach ensures that DEXPLORE not only disseminates its findings effectively but also contributes to knowledge-sharing and skill development in the realm of sustainable raw-materials production. MNLT will assume a leadership role in the exploitation and techno-economic analysis task (T8.2) with a primary goal of delving into the financial viability and market potential of the proposed solutions. Collaborating closely with industrial partners, MNLT will conduct a market analysis, encompassing the identification of target clients, and formulate a comprehensive business plan. The emphasis will be on the most valuable Key Exploitable Results, ensuring a thorough examination and assessment of their potential for improvement and market viability. 1.2.1. Compliance with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle. Our methodology complies with the ‘do no significant harm’ principle, as per Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, nor significantly involve harm any of the six environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy Regulation. Additionally, our consortium commitment with the environment and sustainability has been set on WP7 devoted to the Environmental Assessment of all the technological package that will be developed and optimized through the project. 1.2.2. Artificial Intelligence DEXPLORE will exploit AI algorithms at two points: a) The potential role of AI in new lightweight optical methods for rapid and accurate identification and quantification of minerals in-field using UNICA’s prototype (WP3) could be multifaceted and critical in enhancing the capabilities of the system. Here some potential roles of this AI: • Mineral Identification and Classification: AI algorithms, particularly ML and deep learning models, can be trained to recognize specific spectral signatures associated with different minerals. By analyzing the optical data captured by the prototype device, AI can accurately identify and classify mineral samples in real-time or post-processing. • Quantification and Estimation: AI can aid in quantifying the abundance or concentration of minerals within samples by analyzing the optical characteristics and correlating them with known mineral compositions. This capability enables rapid and accurate estimation of mineral content without the need for extensive laboratory analysis. • Spectral Analysis Enhancement: AI techniques can enhance the spectral analysis capabilities of the prototype device by identifying subtle spectral features or patterns that may not be easily discernible to human observers. This can improve the accuracy and reliability of mineral identification and quantification, especially in complex geological environments. • Data Fusion and Integration: AI can facilitate the integration of optical data from the prototype device with other types of data, such as geological maps, satellite imagery, or geochemical data. By leveraging AI-based data fusion techniques, researchers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the geological context and spatial distribution of mineral resources. • Real-time Decision Support: AI-powered algorithms can provide real-time decision support by rapidly analyzing 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 20  Associated optical data from the prototype device and providing actionable insights with document to field Ref. operators orAres(2024)6673353 geologists. This -enables 20/09/2024 on-site decision-making regarding mineral exploration, resource assessment, and sampling strategies. It is important to mention that the ML and algorithms involved in the data processing of UNICA’s remote field- mineral detector are not involving any personal data thus avoiding any data protection issue and preventing unacceptable harm and safeguarding the physical and mental integrity of humans. The scope of AI integration is exclusively focused on providing reliable and accurate mineral information. b) The development of the XR applications (WP5), always following the strictest rules regarding AI defined by the EC. The algorithms will be used for detecting objects in the surroundings of the end-users utilizing the applications scanning functionalities for positional awareness. AI will not be involved in any activity considered critical (i.e., medical, official education, employment, credit scoring, legal, law, migration or democratic issues). 1.2.3. Other collaborations TalTech will be collaborating with the Trinity College (Ireland) under the upcoming post-doctoral HEARTNET (starting at 2025) - Image mapping LA-ICP-MS technique providing insight of garnet REE and U-Pb system - to apply the developed by the last entity. This collaboration is targeting the analyses of Finnish and Estonian basement samples with the LA-ICP-MS innovative technique developed by the Trinity College and that allows for mineral species identification and discrimination by integrating semi-quantification data through the stepwise distribution of elements or isotopes. This method will provide new information for ore understanding and resource distribution, and will be applied to geothermobarometer minerals, such as garnets. Indeed, TalTech has already sent initial garnets samples from Alutaguse and Finland (Kopparnass) in 2023 (5 samples in total), and once the project starts, at least 10 additional samples will be sent, both for garnets and sulphides investigations. Afterwards, the metamorphic ore model will be developed exclusively by TalTech team under the context of DEXPLORE. GSE is cooperating with Nordic geological surveys on several topics related to exploration of Earth resources. GSE is presently leading an EU funded EGT-TWINN project, which is dedicated to developing advanced geological, geochemical, and geophysical survey skills, data management workflows, and subsurface modeling capability for exploration and geological resource assessment of European critical raw materials and geothermal energy - the future potential green energy source for Estonia. Ther project runs jointly with the Geological Survey of Finland, the British Geological Survey, the Geological Survey of Denmark, and the University of Oulu Mining School. Thus, the advanced skills acquired by the GSE during the mentioned project will be applied to DEXPLORE. 1.2.4. Interdisciplinarity DEXPLORE is a highly interdisciplinary project (Table 3), as it combines different scientific areas form cutting edge geochemistry, mineral system approach, spectral and hyperspectral analysis, optical techniques, geophysics, data interpretation and modeling, computing sciences including Artificial Intelligence, and Virtual and Augmented Reality joined with well-recognized mining companies and geological services. Involving both, academic and industrial partners, the project will propose mineral models for geological terrains well extended across Europe, such as metamorphic rocks and mineralization along planar structures (TalTech, GSE, ATM, MINERSA, TerraDat), targeting critical and strategic raw materials: Fluorite (Fluorspar – CRM), Copper (SRM), Nickel (SRM), Manganese (SRM and CRM), Natural Graphite (CRM) as well as Zinc (Zn), Lead (Pb), and Molybdenum (Mo). This is to increase the knowledge of the European potential of hosting primary CRM and guarantee the scalability and applicability of the developed and optimized techniques beyond the project duration. Table 3. DXPLORE interdisciplinarity. iResearch & Technology Development partner; ii Industrial Partner Geochemistry Spectral - Data Computing Mining LCA – Key Mineral Optics hyperspectral Geophysics interpretation sciences Ai, exploration/ environmental stakeholders’ models analysis and modeling VR, AR exploitation assessment attraction i ii i ii ii TalTech i i Xcalibur CORE i ATM ii ISMC i UNICA ICCS ii ii CORE ii MNLT i GSE TerraDat Xcalibur MINERSA ICAMCyL Additionally, a set of innovative exploration techniques – surface and subsurface (UNICA, ICCS, Xcalibur, TerraDat) – together with visualization innovations (ICCS, CORE, Xcalibur) will be developed allowing for refined and precise identification of deep-seated primary CRM deposits while increasing the awareness of the general public (ISMC; ICAMCyL) about the importance of RM for a successful transition to a climate-neutral and digitised economy and society, and the need for a secure, sustainable, and responsibly-sourced supply of RM to strengthen autonomy and reduce over-dependence on third countries. The output innovations will be validated under small pilots in real areas, to guarantee i) that the innovations reach the set KPIs (calibration pilots – ATM, MINERSA) and ii) are optimal for running initial exploration stages (final validation pilot in Estonia – TalTech, GSE). 1.2.5. Gender Dimension DEXPLORE is committed to comprehensively addressing gender dimensions within its scope. The integration of gender considerations as a key parameter in the systemic analysis, will be led by ISMC in T1.5. DEXPLORE will actively work towards the structural incorporation of a gender dimension in various aspects, including project 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 21 management, dissemination, and exploitation, specifically focusingAssociated with document on raw materials, Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 industry, and mining. In- 20/09/2024 order to advance gender equality, several initiatives will be implemented within the DEXPLORE project, establishing an Equality Policy plan at the beginning of the project, that will be supervised by the steering committee. Special measures will be taken to support women scientists. Additionally, efforts will be made to enhance the visibility of articles and activities by promoting their publication and citation, with a particular focus on acknowledging the contributions of women. DEXPLORE project is committed to actively integrating a gender dimension, especially in social impact studies conducted within WP7 (T7.3). This involves a thorough examination of the social and sociological aspects associated with DEXPLORE technologies. The evaluation will specifically consider the social acceptability of these technologies and explore their positive impacts on society. By incorporating a gender-sensitive approach, the project aims to contribute to a more equitable and inclusive environment in the field of science and technology. 1.2.6. Open Science DEXPLORE partners are dedicated to fostering openness in scientific research by actively engaging with open scientific repositories and publications (e.g. ORE https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/ and ZENODO https://zenodo.org/), including open-access journals or the open access model within subscription-based journals (e.g. each academic partner will engage with the relevant journals), always ensuring alignment with the legitimate interests of the owners of exploitable or patentable results, which will be appropriately managed and protected. The project is committed to incorporating open access considerations at every stage of publication, adhering to the open access policy of higher education (HE), and embracing the FAIR principles of open data. In line with these principles, DEXPLORE will extend open access not only to scientific publications, but also to the metadata that uniquely identifies the deposited publications. Furthermore, the project is aligned with UNESCO Recommendations on Open Science, actively encouraging the voluntary involvement of citizens and relevant stakeholders. This approach reflects the project's commitment to transparency, accessibility, and inclusivity in scientific research. 1.2.7. Research and Data Management Plan All partners will adhere to the FAIR Guidelines on Data Management in Horizon Europe, including archiving all research data generated for ten years. Experimental data will be made freely available to all project partners. With the support of the IP Manager, the generated information will be split as susceptible of IPR or publishable data. Lasting open access to all publications resulting from the project will be ensured by choosing appropriate open access journals and covering the associated publication costs (gold open access). To facilitate prompt open access, before a paper is published, we will exercise the policy of self-archiving in repositories such as arXiv.org or ResearchGate (green open access). If eligible, the project will participate in the OpenAIRE action on Open Research Data. All data arising from the project will be entered in a database accessible via the project website with three access levels, with data available for: (i) the Consortium; (ii) the scientific community; and (iii) public data. 2. Impact 2.1 Project’s pathways towards impact DEXPLORE has developed a comprehensive strategy that encompasses short-term, medium-term, and long-term objectives. In the short term, our immediate focus is on achieving tangible outcomes, referred to as DEXPLORE Outcomes (DEO). Our primary goal is to generate fresh insights into the technologies employed, aiming to create an exploration platform with a successful development of ore models that enhances our understanding of EU reserves of primary CRMs (DEO1). To maximize the impact of the project, both during and after its duration, DEXPLORE is committed to developing a robust plan for Dissemination, Communication, and Exploitation of the results. In the medium term, DEXPLORE will concentrate on enhancing exploration technologies, emphasizing efficiency and sustainability. This includes the development of an Integrated EO and Optics System for Efficient Mineral Surface Exploration and Advanced Gravity and Navigation System Optimization for Airborne and Land-Based Surveys (DEO3). The objective is to identify deep-seated mineral deposits of Critical Raw Materials (CRMs). Looking ahead to the long term, DEXPLORE aims to promote EU exploration projects leveraging the new technologies developed during this initiative (DEO4). Simultaneously, the project aspires to fortify the responsible supply of CRMs, thereby contributing to the transition towards a more sustainable future (DEO5 and DEO6). Our commitment is not only to technological advancement but also to ethical and sustainable practices in the critical raw materials sector to raise public awareness (DEO2). Through this strategic framework, DEXPLORE endeavors to make meaningful contributions to the sustainable development and responsible resourcing of CRMs in the European Union. 2.1.1 Unique contribution towards the topic outcomes EO1: Develop innovative technologies for exploration of critical raw materials in deep land deposits in the EU and non-EU countries. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 22 DEXPLORE is committed to pioneering innovative technologies for Associated with document the exploration of Ref. CRMs Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 through the creation of a comprehensive platform that integrates multiple layers of information, with an ore model based on geophysical, geochemical and petrology data. The methodology involves a systematic approach in two distinct regions, Eastern Europe (Estonia) and Western Europe (Spain). Mineral System Approach: The initial phase entails adopting a mineral system approach, focusing on CRM exploration in deep land deposits. This involves conducting metallogenic studies and analyzing mineral models, leveraging preexisting databases to inform the framework. To investigate ore genesis and mineral CRM distribution, an innovative LA-ICP-MS technique developed by Drost et al. (2018) allows mineral species identification and discrimination by integrating semi-quantification data through the stepwise distribution of elements or isotopes. The image-based LA-ICP-MS offers the advantage of measuring in-situ concentrations, cluster element distribution between carriers and mineral phase varieties, and representative measurements as a first approach to semi-quantifying concentrations (Chew et al., 2021). Remote Sensing Techniques: The next step involves the application of carefully selected remote sensing techniques to recognize and characterize the study areas. This includes using multispectral and hyperspectral images and optical techniques. Innovative Exploration Techniques: DEXPLORE will employ state-of-the-art techniques for deep land exploration. This comprises electromagnetic surveys, magnetotelluric methods, gravimetry, and seismic surveys, providing a comprehensive understanding of the subsurface. GIS Platform and 3D Geological Modeling: Once the requisite information is gathered, the project will progress to the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) platform and 3D geological modeling. This crucial step involves integrating all layers of data, facilitating effective exploitation and analysis. The new technologies will improve in 40% the exploration success rate. DEXPLORE will reduce by 30% the exploration costs. Scale: 2 pilots in 2 different countries and replication 3 years after the project Significance: DEXPLORE aims to create a robust technological framework for CRM exploration in deep land deposits, contributing significantly to advancements in resource exploration within both EU and non-EU countries Target groups: Promoters and Essential Agents, related to the mining industry, research sector and local communities that will support the adoption, implementation, and positive impact of the innovative technologies developed. EO2: Increase the resources and reserves of various primary critical raw materials within the EU and non- EU countries. DEXPLORE is committed to substantially increasing the resources and reserves of CRMs in both EU and non-EU countries. This ambitious objective will be achieved by improving exploration and exploitation methods specifically designed for deep-land deposits. The project concurrently seeks to deepen our understanding of the European basement in Estonia and the broader Baltic region, with a particular focus on investigating potential similarities to the basement in South Sweden and Finland. Given the limited study of the Estonian crystalline basement and its poorly understood mineral potential, the project will significantly advance knowledge of the Estonian Precambrian and the East-European Craton. By applying innovative geophysical methods, the project aims to greatly enhance geological insights into the southern margin of the Fennoscandian Shield. This dual-pronged approach ultimately aims to improve resource availability and contribute to the sustainable development of critical raw materials. New Deposit Models: DEXPLORE will pioneer the development of new deposit models, meticulously considering geological processes and geochemistry within the targeted areas. By comprehensively understanding the subsurface dynamics, the project aims to identify and characterize primary CRMs more efficiently. Remote Sensing Technologies: Leveraging advanced Remote Sensing technologies, tailored to the specific characteristics of each study area, will play a pivotal role in this initiative. These technologies are designed to identify minerals beneath the earth's surface without resorting to drilling, offering a non-invasive and resource-efficient approach to exploration. Method Selection and Analysis: The project will carefully select exploration methods, taking advantage of the opportunity to analyze the properties of rocks and minerals. This analytical approach will provide a nuanced understanding of subsurface resources, contributing to more accurate assessments of primary CRMs. 30% increase on CRMs identified with these new technologies. 25% improvement in resource extraction efficiency. Scale: Development of new exploration methods that will increase in 20% the possible resources of primary CRMs Significance: DEXPLORE aims to make substantial contributions to increasing the resources and reserves of primary CRMs. This not only enhances the availability of these critical materials but also promotes sustainable and efficient practices in their extraction and utilization. Target groups: Promoters and Essential agents like mining companies, research organizations, investors and industry, environmental organizations, and local communities that will foster collaboration, responsible resource management, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 23  Associated and sustainable practices to increase the availability of primary critical with document raw materials Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 within - 20/09/2024 the EU and beyond. EO3: Accelerate development of EU domestic critical raw materials exploration projects integrating innovative technologies. DEXPLORE is committed to expediting the development of exploration projects for EU domestic CRMs by seamlessly integrating cutting-edge technologies. This initiative is designed to foster advancements in resource exploration within the European Union. DEXPLORE will strategically accelerate the development of exploration projects focused on EU domestic CRMs. This entails a comprehensive approach that integrates innovative technologies to streamline and expedite the exploration process. The project will actively incorporate state-of-the-art technologies into every phase of exploration, from initial surveys to advanced geological modeling. This integration aims to enhance the efficiency, accuracy, and sustainability of CRM exploration projects within the EU. DEXPLORE recognizes the importance of collaborative partnerships with relevant stakeholders, including governmental bodies, research institutions, and industry players. These collaborations will facilitate the sharing of expertise, resources, and technological advancements, fostering a collective effort towards accelerated project development. As a part of accelerating CRM exploration projects, DEXPLORE is committed to facilitating knowledge transfer within the EU. This includes disseminating best practices, innovative methodologies, and technological insights to empower stakeholders and contribute to the overall growth of the CRM exploration ecosystem. This project aims to catalyze the development of EU domestic CRM exploration projects. At least 15 joint initiatives/research projects reached. Scale: Promotion of the new exploration techniques throughout the main stakeholders, this will favor the reduction of the impact during exploration in 40%. Significance: This project will contribute to the strategic positioning of the European Union in securing a sustainable and diversified supply of Critical Raw Materials. Target groups: Framework setters and Promoters such as mining companies, governments, policy makers and investors that will promote responsible exploration practices, leading to the accelerated development of domestic CRMs exploration projects within the European Union. EO4: Strengthen EU autonomy and ethical sourcing of raw materials by developing socially and environmentally acceptable means of discovery of primary raw materials. DEXPLORE is dedicated to reinforcing the autonomy of the European Union (EU) and promoting ethical sourcing of raw materials. This involves the development of socially and environmentally acceptable methods for the discovery of primary raw materials. DEXPLORE places a strong emphasis on adopting ethical practices in the discovery of primary raw materials. This commitment is reflected in the company's exploration methodologies, which prioritize environmental sustainability, community well-being, and adherence to ethical labor practices. DEXPLORE recognizes the importance of minimizing drillings that not only escalate costs and lead to delays but also have adverse effects on the environment. By strategically reducing drilling activities, the company not only achieves cost savings but also contributes to a noteworthy decrease in CO2 emissions. The project actively integrates social responsibility considerations into every stage of raw material exploration. This involves engaging with local communities, respecting cultural diversity, and implementing measures that enhance the overall social and economic well-being of the regions involved in exploration activities. DEXPLORE is committed to employing environmentally friendly exploration practices, minimizing the ecological footprint associated with raw material detection. This includes leveraging technologies and methodologies that prioritize biodiversity conservation, responsible land use, and sustainable resource extraction. Furthermore, the project is aligned with and goes beyond international ethical and environmental standards, demonstrating a commitment to responsible sourcing. In case of East Estonian, the project will ensure the transition from the oil-shale industry to other CRM production, protecting local economy and values by ensuring awareness of Estonian basement potential. Substantial reduction of 40-45% in CO2 emissions, accomplished through the strategic implementation of cutting- edge technologies that eliminate the need for traditional drilling methods for CRM exploration. At least 40% of the local community reached through the engagement efforts and satisfied with the positive impact on social and economic well-being, of the new technologies developed. Scale: DEXPLORE will develop new exploration and exploitation methods that will increase by 35% the EU autonomy of RM. Significance: DEXPLORE aims to set a benchmark for ethical exploration practices within the EU, in this line, this project advocates for transparency in the raw material supply chain, ensuring that the journey from discovery to extraction adheres to ethical principles. This commitment enhances accountability and provides stakeholders with clear visibility into the sourcing process. Target groups: Framework setters and Essential Agents, related to Government agencies and regulators, research and environmental organizations, and local communities that will promote ethical sourcing of raw materials through socially and environmentally acceptable means of discovery. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 24  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 EO5: Improve responsible supply of raw materials to the EU in line with the EU principles for sustainable raw materials, which are a non-regulatory set of principles based on the EU acquis. They set out requirements for sustainable raw materials and extraction and processing in Europe in terms of social, environmental and economic performance. DEXPLORE is dedicated to improving the responsible supply of raw materials to the European Union (EU) by aligning with the EU principles for sustainable raw materials. These principles form a non-regulatory framework based on the EU acquis, outlining requirements for sustainable raw materials, as well as extraction and processing practices in Europe. This commitment encompasses social, environmental, and economic performance considerations. DEXPLORE will prioritize strict adherence to the EU principles for sustainable raw materials. This involves integrating these principles into every facet of the supply chain, from exploration to extraction, ensuring that social, environmental, and economic considerations are consistently met. Furthermore, the incorporation of virtual reality in the platform will be aligned with the “do not significant harm” principle, making easier and affordable the exploration methods. The project will incorporate comprehensive performance metrics in line with EU principles. These metrics assess the social impact on communities, the environmental footprint of exploration and extraction activities, and the economic sustainability of the entire raw material supply chain. In this line, DEXPLORE will actively engage with stakeholders, including local communities, industry partners, and regulatory bodies, to ensure that the responsible supply of raw materials aligns with their needs and expectations. This collaborative approach fosters transparency and inclusivity throughout the supply chain. DEXPLORE will reduce the impact of exploration by 45% by enabling access to new deep mineral deposits without additional drilling and incorporating data integration, AI and virtual reality tools. 10 Scientific communications in international congress or reference journals about the social, economic and environmental impacts of the new exploration methods. Scale: DEXPLORE will increase social acceptance of mining exploration in the affected communities by 40%. Significance: DEXPLORE will facilitate knowledge transfer within the EU raw material supply chain. By sharing insights, best practices, and technological advancements, the project will contribute to the overall improvement of responsible sourcing practices across the industry, favoring the continuous improvement and ensuring that the project remains at the forefront of responsible supply chain management. Target groups: Promoters, Framework setters and Essential Agents such us mining companies, EU regulatory bodies, industry, investors, environmental and research organizations, and local communities, that will create a collaborative and inclusive approach to improving the responsible supply of raw materials to the EU in line with the EU principles for sustainable raw materials. EO6: Promote the utilization of UNFC (United Nations Framework Classification for Resources) and UNRMS (United Nations Resource Management System) in the raw materials sector. DEXPLORE will promote the adoption of the United Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC) and the United Nations Resource Management System (UNRMS) within the raw materials sector. The project will actively encourage the integration of UNFC within the raw materials sector. By promoting the use of UNFC, the project will seek to standardize and harmonize the classification of resources, facilitating better communication, understanding, and decision-making across the industry. DEXPLORE will actively collaborate with industry stakeholders, governmental bodies, and international organizations to create awareness about the benefits of adopting UNFC and UNRMS. Collaborative efforts aim to establish a unified approach to resource classification and management, fostering a more transparent and globally aligned raw materials sector. incrementing in at least 15% the use of UNFC within the raw materials sector, engaging organizations and projects to successfully implement the framework. Scale: DEXPLORE will engage at least 20 entities related with the raw material sectors promoting the use of UNFC Significance: By promoting transparency and alignment on a global scale, DEXPLORE aims to contribute significantly to the evolution of a more cohesive and well-coordinated raw materials sector. Target groups: Framework setters and Essential Agents related to governments, international organizations, research organizations, academic institutions, and environmental organizations that will promote a global and standardized approach to resource classification and management within the raw materials sector through the adoption of UNFC and UNRMS principles. 2.1.2 Unique contribution towards the destination impacts KSO C, ‘Making Europe the first digitally-enabled circular, climate-neutral and sustainable economy through the transformation of its mobility, energy, construction and production systems’ DEXPLORE will contribute promoting the adoption of circular economy principles within the raw materials sector, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 25 ensuring that resource exploration and exploitation are optimized,Associated and waste withisdocument Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 minimized by implementing- 20/09/2024 a new platform based on remote sensing data information. Encouraging sustainable and circular practices in resource extraction DEXPLORE can contribute to reducing the environmental footprint of production systems with these non- invasive methods, decreasing the environmental footprint of production systems by 35%, evaluating factors such as reduced carbon emissions, land disturbance, and water usage. KSO A, ‘Promoting an open strategic autonomy by leading the development of key digital, enabling and emerging technologies, sectors and value chains to accelerate and steer the digital and green transitions through human-centred technologies and innovations’ DEXPLORE will contribute to the creation of innovative solutions that enhance efficiency, sustainability, and reduce the environmental impact of raw materials exploration and extraction. The integration of digital tools for resource monitoring will develop the enabling technologies that facilitate more sustainable practices in the raw materials sector. By prioritizing the human aspect, DEXPLORE will contribute to the creation of technologies that are widely accepted, accessible, and beneficial to both industry and society, and will assess this impact by quantifying improvements in resource utilization, reduction in environmental footprint, and adherence to ethical and social considerations in D7.2. KSO D, ‘Creating a more resilient, inclusive and democratic European society, prepared and responsive to threats and disasters, addressing inequalities and providing high-quality health care, and empowering all citizens to act in the green and digital transitions. The project will concentrate on devising solutions that enhance the efficiency of disaster response, optimize resource exploration management, and streamline exploitation efforts. This focus aims to contribute to building a more prepared and resilient society. The project's emphasis on developing non-invasive techniques for exploring EU resources is designed not only to minimize the occurrence of disasters but also to empower citizens. By promoting awareness and providing tools for active participation, the project seeks to ensure that communities benefit from and contribute to the ongoing transitions in a sustainable manner, increasing in 25% the participation of the citizens through green and digital tools. Raw Materials for EU open strategic autonomy and successful transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy In pursuit of the European Union's objective of achieving open strategic autonomy and a seamless transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy, DEXPLORE will concentrate on discovering untapped reservoirs of raw materials within the EU. The project is dedicated to adopting eco-friendly exploration techniques aimed at mitigating environmental impact. This involves the creation of an advanced platform that integrates multiple layers of information, facilitating a comprehensive exploration approach. Moreover, DEXPLORE is resolutely committed to addressing the challenge of ensuring a consistent supply of critical raw materials. Recognizing the potential disruptions posed by geopolitical uncertainties, the project aims to establish strategic stockpiles of these essential materials. By doing so, DEXPLORE seeks to fortify the EU's resilience against supply chain disruptions in at least 35% and contribute to the realization of open strategic autonomy. Green deal impact DEXPLORE is strategically positioned to align with the European Union's ambitious climate targets for 2030 and the overarching goal of achieving climate neutrality by 2050, as outlined in its Green Deal. The project plays a pivotal role by facilitating enhanced access to the identification, classification, and mapping of CRMs in Europe. Undoubtedly, Europe harbors abundant and widespread non-exploited mineral resources, particularly in Eastern EU regions. The project recognizes the immense opportunities for exploration, particularly in CRMs. Addressing the imperative to reduce dependence on imports, DEXPLORE seeks to comprehensively evaluate the untapped potential of deep land mineral deposits, with a specific focus on unexplored terrains in Eastern Europe, but also promoting collaboration with strategic partner countries outside in other continents. In concert with the Green Deal's objectives, DEXPLORE places a significant emphasis on aligning with the "EU principles for sustainable raw materials." By doing so, the project becomes a catalyst for harmonizing social, environmental, and techno-economic considerations in the realm of raw materials exploration. The commitment to sustainability is evident in the project's approach, which seeks to balance the economic benefits of exploration with the imperative to safeguard the environment and uphold social well-being. By adopting this holistic approach, DEXPLORE positions itself as a key contributor to the Green Deal Industry Plan, the implementation of the Critical Raw Materials Action Plan, the EU's new Industry Strategy, Net Zero Industry Act and Critical Raw Material Act. The project recognizes the multifaceted nature of stakeholders involved in the raw materials ecosystem and strives to foster collaboration and coherence in achieving shared social, environmental and economic sustainability goals. Strengthen Competitiveness and Growth of EU Companies DEXPLORE is set to elevate the competitiveness and growth of EU companies through an exhaustive mineral 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 26  Associated systems research initiative in Spain and Estonia. By employing modern withsustainable and document Ref.exploration Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 methods, the project not only aligns with the EU's sustainability objectives but also positions European companies as leaders in responsible resource development, thereby enhancing their global reputation. The implementation of advanced data visualization techniques is a key facet of DEXPLORE's approach. This will not only enhance data management but also empower companies with clearer insights. These insights are instrumental in facilitating more informed decision- making throughout the exploration and resource extraction processes. By leveraging cutting-edge technologies for visualizing complex data layers, DEXPLORE aims to equip EU companies with a strategic advantage in optimizing their mineral exploration endeavors. Furthermore, DEXPLORE's emphasis on exploring untapped potential in mineral-rich regions opens novel avenues for EU companies. This strategic focus creates opportunities for companies to tap into valuable raw materials domestically, thereby diminishing reliance on imports. This shift not only enhances the security of the EU's resource supply but also stimulates the growth and self-sufficiency of European industries, reducing the dependence of imported raw materials in 30% New Market Opportunities and innovation DEXPLORE is set to create fresh market opportunities by establishing a comprehensive value chain dedicated to exploration technologies. Through this initiative, the project aims to cultivate economic growth and elevate the competitiveness of EU companies by introducing cutting-edge solutions. DEXPLORE will evaluate the techno- economic added value and the market analysis results in D8.3, preparing an initial business plan based on the KERs. Societal impact DEXPLORE is poised to make a meaningful societal impact by spearheading the development of innovative solutions aimed at enhancing the overall quality of life for the general public. The positive environmental footprint of the project will further extend its benefits to local communities. By generating green jobs, fortifying security measures, and revitalizing regions through the sustainable development of CRMs, the proposal is designed to contribute significantly to the well-being of citizens. In addressing the pressing demand for CRMs, DEXPLORE not only addresses resource needs but also actively promotes sustainable practices that uplift communities and foster environmental stewardship, increasing in 20% the overall quality of life for citizens in areas influenced by DEXPLORE, considering factors such as economic prosperity, community well-being, and environmental conditions. Synergies with other Research Destination and Clusters DEXPLORE's initiatives exhibit synergies with energy-intensive industries, particularly in the realm of circularity. Additionally, the project aligns strategically with innovation markets propelled by advanced materials, creating noteworthy complementarities with concurrent actions within Cluster 5. By fostering cross-collaboration, DEXPLORE acts as a catalyst, amplifying the overall efficacy of EU research initiatives concentrated on raw materials and environmental sustainability. DEXPLORE is committed to reaching at least 20 initiatives related to the project outcomes. This interconnected approach ensures a more robust and comprehensive impact on advancing sustainable practices and resource management within the European Union. 2.1.3 Barriers and Obstacles Table 4. DEXPLORE barriers and obstacles. Barrier/Obstacles Preventive measure / contingency plan Technical barrier: Technical and Conducting periodic reviews of project operations and fostering close collaboration technological inconsistency in pilot with the partners overseeing pilot operations are integral to facilitating swift feedback operation loops. This approach ensures that innovations remain pertinent and aligned with the project's objectives. Societal barrier: Low social DEXPLORE will provide comprehensive information to various stakeholders through acceptability, social concerns about a coherent plan aimed at enhancing early warning systems for mining impacts on the the impact of mining environment and health. The communication and dissemination strategy will raise awareness among the general public about these technologies and underscore how accessing deeper deposits can decrease the impacts of CRM extraction. Visualization using 3D model will help to reach all publics conveying additional messages about the minimization of costly or hazardous in-situ activities. Economical barrier: Lack of DEXPLORE will assess the feasibility of the technologies developed under the project, market acceptability taking into account economic, social, and environmental considerations. A business case will be grounded in price projections and market studies to facilitate eventual market rollout of the upscaled solutions. Legal barrier: Uncertain DEXPLORE expert partners on mineral exploration and remote sensing have extensive regulations regarding remote experience on all legal aspects to be considered and will help in analyzing and tackling sensing technologies any legal concerns. MNLT will interact with these experts to incorporate regulatory recommendations and relevant legislation within its set of assessments from the early stages of the project. The project will anticipate potential obstacles to the future maturation and market uptake of its key enabling technologies. This proactive 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 27  Associated approach includes active participation with document in relevant eventsRef. Ares(2024)6673353 to stay - 20/09/2024 informed and address any potential blocking situations effectively. Environmental barrier: Stringent Assessing the potential of diverse technologies across various geological areas, environmental protection regulation DEXPLORE aims to tailor exploration solutions to physico-chemical or geological and geological constraints challenges at the pilot areas. 2.2 Measures to maximize impact: Dissemination, exploitation and communication. The DEXPLORE exploitation, communication and dissemination actions are adequately designed considering the different scales of the project as activities for maximizing DEXPLORE’s impact, expecting to deliver all of project’s innovations to the current market. This way, dissemination and exploitation measures will focus on DEXPLORE transference of knowledge, to ensure the readiness of use of the results, while the communication activities aim to inform and promote project content and its results to place them at society disposal. 2.2.1 Plan for the dissemination and exploitation including communication activities. To enhance the effectiveness of the project's outcomes both during and after its completion, the DEXPLORE project will create a comprehensive Dissemination and Communication of Results (D&C) Plan. This document will be collaboratively developed with input from all consortium partners, detailing the project's target audiences, core messages, and preferred communication channels. An exploitation strategy and business case will evolve from an initial exploitation plan developed by MNLT and integrated/synchronized with the updates of the D&C Plan. Using the results from the LCC and specifications from the technical WPs, as well as the results of the demonstration of the technology, a business case will be created for the validated technology, the outputs and application cases, with the aim of exploring the financial sustainability and marketability of the proposed solutions. Target Groups. An exhaustive dissemination and communication plan requires appropriate knowledge of the sectors involved, regions and value chains covered in the project, which is guaranteed given the background and expertise of the DEXPLORE consortium. Partners’ existing contact networks of relevant stakeholders will be the pillar for addressing target groups (Fig. 10), in order to adjust tools, instruments and measures for the effective implication of these groups and for properly targeting the communication and dissemination activities. • Promoters (Prom). They are directly concerned with DEXPLORE, and do have an economic interest, and the power to influence and contribute to the exploration of deep-land mineral deposits. Their engagement can provide proof of the project’s advantages and benefits. DEXPLORE’s Prom include: Mineral exploration providers & suppliers, mining sector, technological applications companies, geophysics industry, geological surveys, other public & private investors. • Framework Setters (FraSe). They have the Fig. 10. DEXPLORE stakeholders’ groups. possibility to change structures, standards, policies, regulations and framework conditions. DEXPLORE planned engagement (2.2.3) with this group is key to achieving a long-term impact of the project outcomes. DEXPLORE FraSe include policy makers at local, regional and EU levels, but also authorities from EU-associated countries, OECD countries, African Union Member States, MERCOSUR, CARIFORUM, Andean Community and countries with which the EU has concluded strategic partnerships on raw materials, as well as professional networks and platforms. • Essential Agents (EsAg). They do not have a direct economic interest in the project outputs, but they are highly relevant in the social, educational and academic contexts. Their endorsement means public support and reputation, social acceptance (key in the multi approach concept of DEXPLORE) and the build-up of social and knowledge structures. DEXPLORE EsAg involves academics and researchers, NGOs and local communities. Communication Activities (Table 5). Communication efforts throughout the DEXPLORE project will be centered on promoting the project and disseminating its outcomes, with the objective of actively involve key stakeholders and the media in both activities. DEXPLORE will leverage mass media channels to effectively share pertinent information about the project with a broader audience and the public at large. Lack of social acceptance can hinder the development of mining exploration. That is why some key messages for the European population are embedded in the project general objectives (1.1.1). Further, DEXPLORE will show to citizens how our solutions promote new skills and new job opportunities enabling to tap the benefits of a greener, fairer, and more digital-based future. To ensure optimal engagement and capture the attention of the target audience, communication activities will undergo thorough analysis and customization. WP8 Communication and Dissemination (D&C) activities will be conducted with the collaborative support of all work packages, particularly WP6 and WP7. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 28 The comprehensive D&C strategy, slated for development at Associated with document the project's Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 inception, will meticulously - 20/09/2024 plan communication actions. This strategy can be adapted as the project progresses and the D&C Plan that contains it is updated, aligning with the evolving needs and interests of stakeholders. The communication will incorporate specific channels designed to reach a broad audience. The subsequent table provides an overview of the channels and activities presented for utilization in the project. Table 5. DEXPLORE Communication activities. Comm. activities Main objective & Key messages Target group Results Project website The website will facilitate interaction between the project and General public * Project website development and external stakeholders, the press, and the public. The dedicated and all with >2000 Newsletters website will furnish comprehensive details about the project, stakeholders visitors/annum consortium, and outcomes. An informative newsletter, * ≥1 newsletters highlighting the project's activities, will be produced released per year annually, and made accessible on the website for reference. Social media Updates and news will be disseminated through pertinent General public Social media tools social media platforms, including Twitter/X, Youtube, and and all with >2000 LinkedIn. stakeholders visitors/yr Professional intro An initial short, animated video and a final longer video on General public >500 total views and and impact results/impact, together with short videos and animations, and all impressions videos, video will be essential to capture the attention of audiences not stakeholders (YouTube, LinkedIn, capsules familiar with the thematic X, Website) Presentations, Inform about the project at key events (e.g FEM, RMW, General public >50 new entities info-desk and f2f GEODAYS, MMH, PDAC) and all engaged or interested meetings at stakeholders in project activities international Contact potential collaborators. exhibitions and conferences Influence relevant stakeholders Press releases and Raise awareness about the project objectives and relevance at General public 1 press release/yr/ interviews of regional level and in local languages and all country represented project partners stakeholders in the consortium Dissemination Activities (Table 6). The dissemination strategy for project results will prioritize close collaboration with all consortium members and engagement with the Advisory Board for international cooperation. Industrial and academic stakeholders will receive targeted information highlighting the progress and the prospective utilization of DEXPLORE outcomes. Information directed toward local and international civil society groups and policymakers will provide a general overview of the project's benefits. ISMC commits to ensuring the availability of non-sensitive outputs to interested parties for at least 5 years after the project ends. Outlined below is a preliminary dissemination plan that comprehensively addresses potential users and applications, encompassing research, industrial standards, skills, and relevant educational training. Table 6. DEXPLORE Dissemination activities. Dissem. activities Main objective & Key messages Target group KPIs DEXPLORE Different consortium priorities will be addressed Academia, Participation of EC and workshops in workshops opened to external participants, Authorities, public authorities including the International Workshop. Industry ≥10 RTOs attending Guided visits at Help visualizing not only the excellence science, Stakeholders and 1 Open Day per pilot site research facilities but also the relevance in terms of economic general public and Open days at regional development, social and environmental pilot sites sustainability Participation in Geology and exploration technical events (e.g. Academia, Participation in at least 10 scientific events FEM, Goldschmidt, EGU, UNECE) will be a Authorities, international scientific- priority to exchange knowledge with geologists Industry technical events and mining actors Publications Emphasize the industrial potential and the Academia, Publishing >5 scientific advantages associated with deep-land CRMs Industry publications. exploration and producing a better understanding Publishing >3 popular of the new technologies applied ensuring science publications. academic recognition of the project’s outputs. Clustering activities Organization of clustering events; elaboration of Academia, ≥3 clustering events. joint clustering activity plan focused on policies, Authorities, >10 relevant EU projects regulations, and standards; data; dissemination. Industry engaged DEXPLORE MOOC to support outreach, remote learning and Students, industry >50 MOOC registrations Academy capacity building based on the results professionals 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 29 Exploitation and IP Strategies (Table 7). The consortium partners Associated with document Ref. will development an Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 initial exploitation plan (M4), subject to continuous updates throughout DEXPLORE duration, which will include potential exploitation scenarios. The final Exploitation Plan will encompass individual result exploitation strategies from each partner, ensuring the protection, enhancement, and effective utilization of knowledge derived from the project. As such, even though this is a R&I Action, DEXPLORE will also function as the foundation for the successful commercialization of the technologies developed within the project. The Consortium Agreement will provide background information as the base for a continuous screening and management of new innovations and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) from project's outset. IPR information will consistently inform the Exploitation Strategy. The Exploitation Strategy will be structured into five sequential steps. In Step 1, the focus will be on identifying all Key Exploitable Results (KERs). Initial market, legal and regulatory analyses for KERs exploitation, including IPR protection options, will be included in a preliminary exploitation strategy (M4). Step 2 will involve a comprehensive market assessment, understanding regulatory framework drivers and barriers on both the demand and supply sides, and evaluating the competition landscape, identifying key entry points for the technologies. Moving to Step 3, the development of individual exploitation strategies will be undertaken using data from the LCC, technoeconomic analyses and meetings with technical partners. Step 4 entails designing a joint business and exploitation plan to support the widespread adoption of DEXPLORE solutions, considering their influence on markets and value chains. Finally, Step 5 will concentrate on crafting an investment plan and financial projections for market growth, aiming to mobilize and attract funds to advance with the technical development up to TRL 9 and plan the go-to-market strategy. Tools such as SWOT analysis, Business Model Canvas, and Financial Sustainability Indicators (NPV, IRR, payback period, CBR, etc.) will be employed in this process. Table 7. Preliminary exploitation and IP protection strategy for DEXPLORE new technologies for deep-land exploration. Exploitable Result Owner Protection measure Measure to support exploitation New CRM/SRM deep-land TalTech, Database rights (creation and Database rights can allow a hybrid deposit models GSE arrangement of data) exploitation model, where free access could be allowed to potentiate mining for EU and allied countries, and limited access. Advanced Gravity and Xcalibur Patents for novel sensor Establish strategic partnerships with Navigation System designs and securing trade industry players for collaborative research Optimization for Airborne and secrets related to proprietary and development, while also leveraging Land-Based Surveys algorithms and integration licensing agreements to enable broader techniques. market Novel seismic noise surveys TerraDat Non-disclosure agreements Establish strategic partnerships with methodology for deep-land Trade secret industry players for collaborative research CRM/SRM exploration with and development potential up to 1,500m depth EO approach and data ICCS Copyright Tier based licensing processing for efficient mineral surface detection Novel remote field mineral UNICA Patents (technical invention) Establish strategic partnerships with detector combining advanced industry players for collaborative research optical techniques (Raman, and development LIBS, and fluorescence spectroscopy) Advanced cloud middleware CORE Trade secret and Design rights Expand the knowledge and capabilities of infrastructure with a robust data (appearance) CORE’s platform to support future product warehouse development XR application for 3D model ICCS Copyright Licensing visualization and social engagement 2.2.2. DEXPLORE clustering plan. DEXPLORE cross-projects collaboration plan is based on clustering projects network, develop joint activities, and future collaboration planning. A network of projects with similar aims and synergies will be identified, including the other 3 projects funded under the same call, other European projects and national and regional projects. DEXPLORE will promote and encourage collaboration activities with the different projects identified in Section 1 (mainly with the sister projects). These activities include: regular meetings, invitations to project meetings and events to generate collaborative ideas and joint participation and attendance to webinars or local events (organized by projects), active participation in projects social media sites (X/Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.), development of joint scientific communications, recommendations supporting the development of future policy around mining exploration and joint participation in scientific conferences and business tradeshows. Engagement with Horizon Results Booster will be sought in order to potentiate synergies with Horizon funded projects. A clustering plan and 3 clustering events will ensure development of research and innovation ideas between the projects. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 30  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 2.2.3. Feedback to policy measures and standardization. Successful exploitation will only occur if the end-users are receptive to the solutions developed in the project and standards are a critical part of a functioning marketplace. Considering existing standards for the development of DEXPLORE solutions will guarantee that the results respect established practices, enhance interoperability and reach a better market application. DEXPLORE will seek interaction with HSbooster.eu, Standardization Development Organizations or Technical Committees/Working Groups relevant to the project's objectives to ensure contribution of DEXPLORE technical partners to relevant standards and policies (T8.1, T8.3). Roundtables and meetings will be organized with FraSe stakeholders (e.g. regulators and public authorities) to discuss our exploration activities from a technical and economic perspective (e.g. EISMEA, DG GROW, ERRIN, CoR). Using their feedback, DEXPLORE will analyze how our methods, technologies, and results fit with existing policies and will participate in any needed policy changes. This could include writing policy briefs, speaking at policy forums and working on policy initiatives (T8.1, T8.4). 2.3 Summary Fig. 11 presents DEXPLORE summary. Quality and efficiency of the implementation 3.1 Work plan and resources DEXPLORE is structured in 6 technical and scientific WPs (WP2 to WP7) supported by 2 additional WPs: Project Coordination and Management (ISMC - WP1) and Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and Clustering (ISMC - WP8) (Figs. 12 and 13). WP2 (TalTech) is devoted to the development of new mineral and ore models adapted to the target minerals and geological formations. WP3 (ICCS) will be focused on the combination of spectroscopy data with satellite hyperspectral and multispectral remote sensing data towards upscaling surface mineral exploration mapping to a wider extent. In WP4 (TerraDat) the partners will optimize Fig. 12: Pert diagram innovative primary and secondary deep land mineral exploration techniques directed to obtain accurate results for depths up to 600 m (with potential up to 1,500 m depth) while being cost efficient. This WP includes two calibration pilots at actual mining sites (ATM, MINERSA) to verify that the set KPIs for the UAV gravity sensor and the passive seismic methodologies are achieve before to go to the final validation. WP5 (CORE) is directed to create an advanced visualization and interaction platform, that via an intuitive and interactive user interface and 3D & XR visualization capabilities will be able to integrate and manage large-scale, diverse datasets efficiently, ensuring real-time data processing while bringing close geological and scientific datasets to the general public. After the technical development expected in the previous WPs, WP6 (GSE) will deal with the validation of the different technological approaches via the final validation pilot across the Precambrian crystalline and metamorphic basement. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 31  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Fig. 11. DEXPLORE summary – Section 2.3 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 32 Moreover, this WP includes the validation of the GIS/XR visualization Associated with documentplatform. and interaction Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 In WP7 (MNLT) a Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of the different technologies and their parameters will be performed to arrive at both relevant and aligned scenarios for the upscaled technology for LCA-LCC-SLCA, and to provisional suggestions on improvement of the environmental performance. Finally, WP8 (ISMC) will cover the design and execution of the communication and dissemination plan and activities targeting the quadruple helix players. Further, it will develop a comprehensive exploitation strategy, and attract stakeholders to activate synergies, ensure multi-level local to international outreach. This will be done through clustering activities with selected relevant projects and via the strengthening of an international Advisory Board pointing towards mirroring and replication actions in regions within and outside Europe. Year 1 Ye ar 1 Year 2 Year 3 Ye ar 2 Le ade r WP Task Leader WP Task Start End Le ade Start End r 112 3 24 5 637 849 10511 12613 714 15816 1791810 Leader 19 20 2111 22 2312 24 25 261327 2814 29 30 15 31 32 3316 34 3517 36 18 19 20 21 Definition of consortium operating procedures, quality Definitionand of consortium operating procedures, quality and 1 36 1ISMC 36 ISMC 1.1 equity assurance 1.1 equity assurance WP1 - Project WP1 - Project 1.2 Monitoring of work advancement and financial management 1 management 1.2 Monitoring of work advancement and financial 36 ISMC 1 36 ISMC ISMC coordination and ISMC coordination and 1.3 Risk, IPR and data management 1 36 ISMC 1 36 ISMC management management 1.3 Risk, IPR and data management 1.4 Communication within the consortium and with EC 1 with EC 36 1.4 Communication within the consortium and ISMC 1 36 ISMC 1.5 Gender dimension and gender balance supervision 1 1.5 Gender dimension and gender balance supervision 36 ISMC 1 36 ISMC 2.1 Integration of (pre)existing geological information2.1 Integration of (pre)existing geological information 1 12 1 GSE 12 GSE WP2 - Level 1 - 2.2 Geochemical analysis WP2 - Level 1 - 2.2 Geochemical analysis 1 12 TalTech 1 12 TalTech TalTech Mineral systems 2.3 TalTech XRF, infrared, magnetic susceptability Mineral systems 2.3 XRF,of multiscanning drill infrared, cores magnetic 1 susceptability multiscanning18 of drill cores 1 GSE 18 GSE approach 2.4 Petrophysical analysis approach 2.4 Petrophysical analysis 3 12 TerraDat 3 12 TerraDat 2.5 Integrated mineral models for targeted settings/minerals 8 24 2.5 Integrated mineral models for targeted settings/minerals TalTech 8 24 TalTech WP3 - Level 2 - 3.1 Mineral exploration with remote sensing data - 3.1 Mineral exploration with remote sensing1data - Copernicus WP3 - Level- 2Copernicus 18 1 ICCS 18 ICCS Remote Sensing 3.2 Field mineral detection prototype and lab Remote Sensing 3.2 Field mineral detection prototype and lab1validation 18 validation UNICA 1 18 UNICA ICCS ICCS for surface 3.3 for surface 3.3 Hyperspectral signatures of unknown13 Hyperspectral signatures of unknown materials materials 18 13ICCS 18 ICCS exploration 3.4 Data interpretation and resource assessment exploration 3.4 Data interpretation and resource assessment 15 20 15ICCS 20 ICCS WP4 - Level 3: Optimization and finetuning of the first European WP4 - Level 3: unmanned Optimization and finetuning of the first European unmanned 1 18 Xcalibur 1 18 Xcalibur Geophysical 4.1 aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry Geophysical 4.1 aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry TerraDat techniques for TerraDat techniques for 1 method 12 TerraDat 4.2 Land-based technique – innovative seismic method 4.2 Land-based technique – innovative seismic 1 12 TerraDat deep land deep land exploration 4.3 2 calibration pilots at actual mining sites exploration 12 4.3 2 calibration pilots at actual mining sites 22 TerraDat 12 22 TerraDat Analysis of datasets and platform specifications 5.1 Analysis of datasets and platform specifications 5.1 1 8 1CORE8 CORE WP5 - Level 4: Development of the DEXPLORE platform WP5 - Level 4: 5.2 Development of the DEXPLORE platform9 24 9CORE 24 CORE 5.2 Visualization and Visualization and CORE 5.3 Development of the smart visualisation COREdashboard 5.3 and UIof the smart visualisation9dashboard and24 Development UI 9CORE 24 CORE interaction interaction platform 5.4 3D Geological Modelling platform 5.4 3D Geological Modelling 8 32 Xcalibur 8 32 Xcalibur 5.5 Extended Reality tools 5.5 Extended Reality tools 12 32 12ICCS 32 ICCS Data collection during the final in-field pilot across the Estonian Data collection during the final in-field pilot across the Estonian 19 29 19 GSE 29 GSE 6.1 metamorphic basement 6.1 metamorphic basement 6.1.1 Remote sensing anlysis 6.1.1 Remote sensing anlysis 19 23 19ICCS 23 ICCS WP6 - Final in- 6.1.2 Geophysical suvery WP6 - Final in- 6.1.2 Geophysical suvery 24 29 TerraDat 24 29 TerraDat GSE field technology GSE field technology and Final Estonian mineral model - Data interpretation resource Final Estonian mineral model - Data interpretation 25 and36 resource 25 GSE 36 GSE validation 6.2 assessment validation 6.2 assessment XR platform validation and Social License to Operate:XR platform validation and Social License 24to Operate:36 24ICCS 36 ICCS 6.3 Educational/acceptability activities involving general public activities involving general public 6.3 Educational/acceptability 6.4 Finetuning of DEXPLORE technology 6.4 Finetuning of DEXPLORE technology30 36 30 36 5 36 MNLT 5 36 MNLT 7.1 Data compilation and scenarios 7.1 Data compilation and scenarios WP7 - LCA & WP7 - LCA & MNLT Environmental 12 36 MNLT 7.2 Life Cycle Assessment and Life CycleMNLT Environmental Cost 7.2 Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost 12 36 MNLT Assessment Assessment 12 36 MNLT 12 36 MNLT 7.3 Social Life Cycle Assessment 7.3 Social Life Cycle Assessment 8.1 Dissemination and communication plan, activities8.1and events Dissemination and communication plan,1activities and36 events ISMC 1 36 ISMC WP8 - WP8 - 1 36 MNLT 1 36 MNLT Dissemination, 8.2 Exploitation planning and Technoeconomic analysis Dissemination, (TEA) 8.2 Exploitation planning and Technoeconomic analysis (TEA) ISMC Exploitation, 8.3 Clustering activitites ISMC Exploitation, 8.3 Clustering activitites 1 36 ICAMCyL1 36 ICAMCyL Communication International integration and multi–stakeholder Communicationengagement – and multi–stakeholder engagement – International integration and Clustering 8.4 6 36 ICAMCyL6 36 ICAMCyL Advisory Board and Clustering 8.4 Advisory Board 8.5 Training and knowledge-transfer program 8.5 Training and knowledge-transfer program 18 36 TalTech 18 36 TalTech Fig. 13: DEXPLORE Gantt Chart. Operational risks will be managed by the solid management structure lead by ISMC (T1.1), a clear delineation of tasks and a CA to be signed in the first 6 months. Our technical risks related to innovation are best countered by collaborative expertise and development – validation sequence. Table 3.1g: ‘Subcontracting costs’ items 5- TalTech Cost (€) Description of tasks and justification LA-ICP-MS measurements 11,000 LA-ICP-MS analyses conducted with Trinity College Dublin. 450€/day (ca. 3 acquisitions). The goal is to analyse 50 zone for Estonian materials, and 20 from Spanish sulphides. Tal Tech has preselected the Trinity College Dublin for the analysis because of the unique technology developed and the efficiency provided by their method. The technique proposed for the mineral investigations in the project is an LA-ICP-MS method based on the ablation of rasters combined into maps developed by the Department of Geology of Trinity College Dublin (Drost et al., 2018). The image-based LA-ICP-MS technique is an accurate and cost-effective tool for determining geochemical signatures (Chew et al., 2021). In this project, the technique will be applied to economic minerals of the Estonian Precambrian basement and offers the advantage of measuring the in-situ concentration of multiple components in a single sample. Moreover, Trinity owns an LA-ICP-MS 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 33  Associated dedicated to sulphide analysis, major with minerals economic documentinRef. theAres(2024)6673353 DEXPLORE project.- 20/09/2024 This facility will ensure the accuracy of datation and geochemical assays. Table 3.1h: ‘Purchase costs’ items (travel and subsistence, equipment, and other goods, works and services) This table has been addressed for those DEXPLORE partners which Purchase costs are higher than 15% of its staff cost. 1- ISMC Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 28,000 WP1–10k€ 4 project meetings (2 people at least x (KoM+M12+M24+M36)), WP6– 3k€ attendance to all pilot open days WP8– 15K€ 2 people attendance to workshops/events/pilot open days. It can include travel outside the EU and from outside the EU and for AB members. Other goods, works, services 126,000 WP1, WP8– 85k€ [organization of KoM+RV1+ Final meeting/event, 1 clustering workshop, D&C events], WP8– 20k€ (T8.1 videos), 2k€ (conference fees), 4k€ (D&C material/printing),7k€ (Website), WP1– 8k€ Certificate Financial Statement (CFS). Remaining purchase costs 1,000 Total 155,000 1.1- ICAMCyL Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 15,000 WP1– 5k€ 4 project meetings (2 people x (KoM+M12+M24+M36)), WP8– 10k€ 2 people x 4 events. It can include travel outside the EU and from outside the EU and for AB members. Other goods, works, services 50,000 WP8– 25k€ (Organization of 1 clustering workshop), 25k€ (International workshop). Remaining purchase costs 5,000 Total 70,000 2.1- CogniSensus Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 10,000 WP1– 4k€ (1 person x 4 project meetings), WP6– 6k€ (2 persons x 2 visits to Estonian pilot for data collection) Remaining purchase costs 2,000 Total 12,000 3- UNICA Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 27,000 WP1– 8k€ (2 people x 4 project meetings), WP6– 17k€ (3 people for data acquisition x 1 Final pilot: Estonia), WP8– 2k€ (2 people x 1 dissemination event) Other goods, works, services 18,000 WP3– 12k€ (consumable and optical components for building the prototype D3.1), 3k€ (general expenses for equipment maintenance). WP6– 3k€ (logistics costs). Remaining purchase costs 10,000 Total 55,000 5- TALTECH Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 12,000 WP1– 5k€ (2 person x 4 project meetings), WP6- 3k€ (2 people x 6 visits to Estonian pilot zone), WP8- 4k (2 people x 4 trips for attendance to events) Other goods, works, services 43,400 WP1– 10k€ Certificate on Financial Statement (CFS), WP2– 12k€ Lab consumables (XRF and ICP-MS Flux, thick and thin section materials, gas tanks); WP2 - WP6: 1.9k€ Oasis licenses, WP8– 12k€ publishing costs (e.g., Tectonophysics 3k€, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 3.5k€, Mineralium Deposita 2.9k€); 6k€ for registration in 4 events (3 researchers*0.5k€ per event); 0.5k€ posters edition; 1k€ communication material for C&D events. Remaining purchase costs 30,450 Total 85,850 7- TerraDat Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 49,000 WP1– 4k€ (1 person x 4 project meetings); WP4 - WP6– 40k€ (4 people and up to 30 days for data acquisition x 3 pilots for geophysical survey – calibration: ATM, MINERASA; Final: Estonia), WP8– 5k€ (2 people x 2 conference attendance). Equipment 5,000 WP4 - WP6– Amortization of 7 months of use in the project of the geophysical equipment needed for the passive seismic survey: seismic nodes and petrophysical equipment. - nodal equipment, tot. cost 37.957€, deprec. 60m @ 632€/m * 7m = 4.428€ - GNSS RTK system, tot. cost 7.840€, deprec. 96m @ 81€/m * 7m = 571€ Remaining purchase costs 2,000 Total 56,000 8- Xcalibur Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 42,530 WP1– 4k€ (2 people x 4 project meetings), WP4 - WP 6– 35k€ (6 people x 3 pilots for geophysical survey – calibration: ATM, MINERSA; final: Estonia), WP8– 3.53k€ (2 people x 2 conference attendance). Equipment 141,000 WP4 - WP6– UAV 25k (1 year life total, no depreciation) and sensor components 116k€ (320k€ total cost / 3 years depreciation = 12 months use in the project approx.). 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 34  Other goods, works, services 16,000 Associated WP1– Certificate on Financial Statementwith(CFS) document 6k. Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 WP4-WP6– - 20/09/2024 Operational costs 10k€ (technical modifications of the drone -HW and SW). Remaining purchase costs 23,000 Total 222,530 10 - ATM Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 4,000 WP1– 4k€ (project meetings, 1 person x 4 meetings). Other goods, works, services 4,000 WP6– Co-organization of meetings and open pilot day with general public. Remaining purchase costs 4,000 Total 12,000 11- MINERSA Cost (€) Justification Travel and subsistence 8,000 WP1– 4k€ (project meetings, 1 person x 4 meetings), WP3– 3k€ ((1 person x 3 technical meetings), WP8– 1k€ (attendance to conferences and workshop). Other goods, works, services 9,000 WP6– 3k€ Co-organization of meetings and open pilot day with community and general public, WP2– 6k€ (30-element chemical analyses*50samples) Remaining purchase costs 4,000 Total 21,000 Table 3.1i: ‘Other costs categories’ items (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) 13- MINERSA Cost (€) Justification Internally invoiced goods 8,700 WP2– Internal CIM (Minersa Centro Investigación Metalúrgica) for analyses and services beyond capacities of site labs 3.2 Capacity of participants and consortium as a whole DEXPLORE gathers 12 partners from 4 nations – Spain, Greece, Estonia, and Italy. Each partner represents the top- notch expertise in its field, playing a distinctly role in the project reflecting its multidisciplinary scope (Sect. 1.2.4), and has experience of past or ongoing bi-lateral collaboration with other DEXPLORE partners. Furthermore, to increase the change of replicability and scalability of DEXPLORE results, the consortium will work during the project for strengthening the Advisory Board (AB) with members of the EU strategic partnerships for a resilient and sustainable supply of raw materials, joining EU and non-EU (Morocco, Colombia, Chile, Argentina) stakeholders. The AB is then directed to advance on reducing the serious risks to the Union’s strategic assets, economic and societal interests, autonomy, and security associated with the current EU reliance on a few third countries for CRM (see Methodology). (1) - (ISMC) – Spain. The Iberian Sustainable Mining Cluster (ISMC), in collaboration with (2) the International Center in Advanced Materials and raw materials for CyL (ICAMCYL) – Affiliated Entity - possesses robust technical and managerial expertise demonstrated through their active participation and coordination of various European projects. Dr. S. Cuesta-López, the project coordinator, plays a pivotal role in representing Spain within the high-level Operation Group responsible for formulating the EU plan on raw materials. Comprising more than 80 companies and organisations, ISMC is generating a strong ecosystem in the Spanish mining sector and its associated services to accelerate the transition from the traditional mining industry to an innovative, sustainable one, with the ability to secure the raw materials that will shape the technologies of the future. ISMC currently leads the coordination or communication activities of a dozen EU-funded R&I collaborative projects. DEXPLORE role: a) ISMC will take the lead in coordinating the project by establishing a dedicated coordination team characterized by robust technical skills and extensive experience in EU projects (WP1). ISMC brings valuable expertise in sustainable mining exploration and CRM sectors. Furthermore, ISMC will spearhead the efforts in the Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication, and Clustering Work Package (WP8). Leveraging its extensive networks, ISMC is well- positioned to excel in stakeholder engagement. The organization is committed to effectively disseminating project outcomes, exploiting results for practical applications, communicating project advancements, and fostering collaborative clustering activities. Through these initiatives, ISMC aims to enhance DEXPLORE's impact and promote sustainable practices within the mining exploration and CRM sectors. Additionally, leveraging its extensive network, ICAMCYL will take on the responsibility of leading clustering activities enabling and promoting EU and global replicability of the project results and overseeing international integration and multi-stakeholder engagement (T8.3, T8.4). With a strong emphasis on collaboration and inclusivity, ICAMCYL is well-equipped to foster connections and engagement with various stakeholders on an international scale and multi–stakeholder engagement with relevant EU projects, European clusters and S3P mining regions, and will manage connection with the Raw Materials Information System (RMIS). This strategic role ensures effective coordination among diverse entities, promoting synergies, and facilitating a holistic approach to the project's objectives. ICAMCYL's broad network positions them as a key contributor to building partnerships and promoting collaborative efforts that align with the project's overarching goals. (2) EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON (ICCS) – Greece. The Institute of Communication and Computer Systems (ICCS) of the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) of the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) was founded in 1992 following a roadmap to support the performance of top-quality research, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 35  Associated development and the provision of scientific service to private and public bodies.with document Ref.progress ICCS/NTUA Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 in disciplines of electrical and computer engineering, has led to successfully achieve its set goals and grow to a competent research institute in Greece and Europe. Also, ICCS has outstanding expertise in smart systems, data science, mobility, software engineering, and extended reality in various sectors such as construction and mine industries as well as fostering engagement through immersive technologies. In addition, in line with DEXPLORE project, ICCS is experienced in ΕΟ services for mining and the exploration of deep deposits. ICCS is very active in programs financed by the European Commission with substantial participation in competitive research programs. Up to date ICCS has participated in more than 230 projects (FP6, FP7), 76 projects of Horizon 2020 (e.g. TERRAVISION, MASTERMINE, THEROS) and in more than 500 national projects (ESPA, etc). DEXPLORE role: ICCS, with a highly balanced team, will lead the WP3 devoted to the development of Level 2 - Remote Sensing for surface exploration. Specifically, ICCS will oversee mineral exploration using remote sensing data (Copernicus) deploying EO solutions for the mining industry targeting deep land CRM and SRM (T3.1). Moreover, ICCS will play a key role for developing the Level 4: Visualization and interaction platform (WP5) by adding the XR tools considering the GIS platform specifications and architecture. During the establishment of spectral signatures of the targeted CRM/SRM being supported via the deployment of hyperspectral cameras in-situ (T3.3), ICCS will participate with its Affiliated Entity COGNISENSUS. CogniSensus is a spin-off company of ICCS that focuses on the development of services and products in relation to sensing, data transfer, data driven modelling, actuation and decision facilitation. CogniSensus is active in the areas of Smart Manufacturing, developing products related to mechanical separation and sorting with a focus on custom solutions from sensing to mechanical design. CogniSensus will support ICCS to tasks related to WP3 based on IPR owned by the company in hyperspectral imaging and related datasets. (3) (UNICA) – Italy. UNICA (Italy) The University of Cagliari (UNICA) - established in 1606 - is a public state University with about 36,000 enrolled students, over 1,200 teaching staff and about 1,300 technical-administrative staff. Boasting internationally acclaimed results in various fields and numerous agreements with prestigious universities around the world, UNICA pursues a policy aimed at enhancing local academic excellence and it is one of the largest enterprises in Sardinia. UNICA has high-tech interdisciplinary laboratories equipped with cutting-edge equipment and top-level scientific skills offering facilities ranging from optical microscopy to X-ray diffraction, analytical chemistry, ultrafast spectroscopies and materials characterization. UNICA possesses a wide research program in collaboration with different international organizations, most of them financed by EU grants. UNICA is supported for the administrative management by the administrative staff of the European Project Office and by the central Liaison Office. At the moment, UNICA participates in 38 EU projects, among them 8 in the thematic area of physics, chemistry and engineering. UNICA is strongly active and involved in gender equality policies, in particular UNICA is beneficiary of the H2020 Project (Supera - Supporting the promotion of equality in research and academia) - H2020-Swafs-2017. The main mission is to elaborate and circulate the knowledge, to participate to the development culture, society and economy by means of research activity, high level teaching and knowledge transfer. DEXPLORE role: UNICA is involved in the actions dedicated to surface exploration and particularly on the development of new techniques and optical devices leading T3.2 and actively participates in T3.3. Also, UNICA will support coordination (WP1) and communication and dissemination (WP8) activities. The research group is constituted by 3 full staff people of the Physics Department of the University of Cagliari and share its laboratories at the Department of Physics and the large-scale facilities at CESAR (UNICA): Pier Carlo Ricci (Associate professor), Stefania Porcu (Assistant professor) and Chiara Olla (Assistant professor) - performing activities related to the experimental, theoretical, and modeling study of mechanochemical kinetics and to the training and supervision of recruited researchers. (4) CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS MAKE (CORE IC) – Greece. CORE Innovation Centre is a fast-growing private R&D organisation focusing on delivering Industry 4.0 technological solutions to empower industrial operations with next-generation solutions - deep learning, IoT, edge computing, cloud computing -, sustainable practices and a human-centric approach. As a meeting point between industry and academia, CORE facilitates collaboration between industry leaders and research institutions by focusing in co- creating and developing Industry 4.0 solutions. In an era where data serves as the main driver of industrial processes, CORE's strategic response to this paradigm is the implementation of cloud middleware, synergized with a data warehouse, utilizing cutting-edge equipment and state-of- the-art infrastructure. To efficiently manage the big data volumes from industrial processes, CORE deploys high- performance servers, storage, and data processing units while leveraging key technologies (e.g. Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, Ceph, ROCE, KVM, OpenZFS). These technological components aim to serve the cloud environment with scalability and reliability. Furthermore, the cloud middleware and data warehouse will be hosted on secure cloud infrastructure, leveraging cloud service providers renowned for their security protocols and high availability. This infrastructure will encompass a network of data centers strategically distributed to ensure data redundancy, minimize latency, and recovery capabilities. CORE will employ advanced data integration tools, data governance frameworks to ensure the seamless aggregation, storage, and retrieval of extensive and diverse datasets, so that project stakeholders can harness the full potential of big data and hence enable them to extract valuable insights, identify emerging trends, 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 36 and facilitate data-driven decision-making. In essence, CORE's pivotalAssociated with document Ref. role in implementing theAres(2024)6673353 cloud middleware - 20/09/2024 with data warehouse services is relying on a forward-looking approach that not only meets the immediate needs of data- intensive industries but also lays the foundation for a data ecosystem for efficient, scalable, and secure data and application utilization. In addition, CORE has extensive expertise in EU-projects, participating in >40 projects focused on process industry, manufacturing and mining. DEXPLORE role: CORE, with a high-level female team, will be leading the development of the Visualization and interaction platform (WP5) working alongside the different information levels’ working groups (WP2 to WP4) to define an optimal UX and user interface including VR capabilities by collaborating with ICCS. CORE will also collaborate on the integration of the different agents and the platform with the front-end system. Furthermore, during the final in-field validation (WP6) CORE will actively participate in the validation of the platform and the Social License to Operate as well as the last finetuning of the platform according to the validation results (T6.3, T6.4). CORE support during the Dissemination, Exploitation, Communication and Clustering activities is also included (WP8) (5) TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY (TalTech) – Estonia. Founded in 1918, is the sole technological university in Estonia and the most international too with 11% of the nearly 10,000 enrolled students, coming from >100 different countries across the globe. TalTech is a research-based university offering Bachelor’s, Master’s and Doctorate degrees in engineering, natural sciences, IT, business and maritime studies. As a leader in science, technology, and innovation, the school maintains constant interaction with universities around the world, bringing together scientists, students, and entrepreneurs. TalTech’s mission is to be a promoter of science, technology, and innovation and a leading provider of engineering and economic education in Estonia. DEXPLORE role: In the DEXPLORE project, the Department of Geology with its Division of Mining and Mineral Technology is leading WP2 (Level 1 - Mineral system approach for deep-land exploration of primary CRM) with Dr. Tony Hand (Sustainable Mining Project Manager) leading the team. Moreover, the researchers Sophie Graul with key expertise in metallogeny and Juan Solano expert in Geophysics and Geochemistry complete TalTech team. In WP6, TalTech is also having a key role for arriving at the final Estonian mineral model. On the other hand, TalTech connections with Nordics mining schools as the ones at Oulu and Helsinki universities, and the Trinity College in Dublin, will bring valuable contributions during the strengthening of the Advisory Board (WP8). (6) MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE (MNLT) – Greece. MNLT is dedicated to cultivating robust and sustainable businesses, focusing on transforming innovative ideas into valuable and marketable offerings, subsequently commercializing them in specific market sectors. MNLT Innovations I.K.E. specializes in various domains, including the exploitation of Earth's mineral resources (raw materials) and by-products (natural and industrial residues, end-of-life products), the development of catalyst-based emission control devices for automotive, marine, and industrial sectors, recycling of end-of-life materials (e.g. catalysts and permanent magnets), and the formulation of eco-friendly construction materials. The comprehensive set of services includes i) product development consultation; ii) Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) services ensuring the sustainability of a company's entire life cycle operation, encompassing economic, environmental, and societal aspects; iii) securing intellectual property (IP); and iv) establishing prospective companies, developing business plans for innovative offerings, conducting market and competition analyses, and segmenting and engaging stakeholders. DEXPLORE role: MNLT is leading the Environmental assessment / Life Cycle (LCA) (WP7) as well the exploitation planning and techno-economic analysis (T8.2) of DEXPLORE to ensure the technology resulting from the project is pursuing a sustainable supply of CRM while guaranteeing the exploitation of the project results. (7) Terradat Geophysics S.L. (TerraDat) – Spain. TerraDat is a leading geophysical company established to address the need for exploration and monitoring of the subsurface. Terradata’s innovative geophysical methods are applied across a wide range of sectors, including mineral exploration, civil and geotechnical engineering, environmental monitoring, renewable energy, and the water industry. Terradata’s success lies in innovative technology, and in the training and professional development of our experts. TerraDat is led by scientists, who continue to work with research centers to expand the company’s technological capabilities. TerraDat ensure the best quality surveys thanks to a highly qualified staff, which is composed by experienced geophysicists. TerraDat is on-going research interests in conjunction with Earth Science departments at several European universities with the intention of bringing newly ideas to the market, including the developments of passive seismic surveys for deep exploration. DEXPLORE role: TerraDat is leading the WP4 dedicated to Level 3 – Subsurface exploration (deep land) – Geophysical exploration, bringing innovation with its land-based “passive seismic method” based on using seismic noise (T4.3). Moreover, TerraDat brings expertise in Petrophysics, which is a key asset in the initial stages of a geophysical exploration (WP2). In WP5, TerraDat will be supporting Xcalibur with the 3D geological modeling while in WP6 is having a significant role during the geophysical campaign in Estonia and the passive seismic data collection and interpretation. Its participation in dissemination and communication activities is also included (WP8). (8) XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL (Xcalibur) – Spain. Xcalibur Smart Mapping is the global leader in airborne and mapping geophysics industry. With solid experience and a track record of exponential growth, XCALIBUR offers a wide range of advanced services and technologies for the exploration and evaluation of mineral, energy, and environmental resources. Owning a fleet of more than forty 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 37 aircraft equipped with geophysical systems, XCALIBUR maps countries Associated with document and lands Ref.the to identify Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 properties of the sub- and above-surface, and discover potential areas of natural resources, such as critical minerals, hydrogen, or geothermal. Its multidisciplinary and highly qualified team of experts (>300 highly qualified employees) employs cutting-edge technologies, including gravimetry, magnetometry or radiometry, to interpret this smart data and generate detailed reports and accurate recommendations. XCALIBUR operates in 6 continents where >1,400 projects have been executed. All this with the firm purpose of accelerating a just energy transition for a more sustainable economy, making us the partner of reference in natural capital mapping. DEXPLORE role: Xcalibur will work on Level 3 – Subsurface exploration (deep land) – Geophysical exploration (WP4) by optimizing and testing its novel unmanned aerial vehicle airborne gravimetry (T4.1, T4.2). Moreover, Xcalibur will lead the important task of adding the 3D Modeling into the Visualization and interaction platform (WP5) with the support of TerraDat. Additionally, in WP6 devoted to the technology final validation in Estonia, Xcalibur is having a significant role during the geophysical campaign and the UAV gravity data collection and interpretation. Its participation in dissemination and communication activities is also included (WP8). (9) EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS (GSE) – Estonia. The Geological Survey of Estonia, GSE (state agency) started operating on January 1st, 2018. From July 1, 2023, GSE operates under the administration of the Ministry of Climate. GSE operates in the areas of a) geological mapping and surveys, b) ensuring access and preservation to geological information, c) government authorities advise, d) public information about concerning earth’s crust topics. Given GSE comprehensive research in ore geology, including recent deep exploration drillings in NE Estonia, N Estonia, and Central Estonia, GSE has acquired new geological material including new drill hole geophysical logging. GSE latest technological advancement involves an extensive crystalline rock drill core scanning - Geotek. Moreover, GSE has experience as an EU project coordinator, with the EGT-TWINN project (Horizon Europe funding program) dedicated to develop advanced geological, geochemical, and geophysical survey skills, data management workflows, and subsurface modeling capability for exploration and geological resource assessment of European critical raw materials and geothermal energy - the future potential green energy source for Estonia. On the other hand, GSE is working closely with experts from leading international research institutions such as the Geological Survey of Finland, the British Geological Survey, the Geological Survey of Denmark, and the University of Oulu Mining School. DEXPLORE role: GSE is actively participating in Level 1 - Mineral system approach for deep-land exploration of primary CRM, collaborating with TalTech with the integration of existing Estonian geological information and running XRF, infrared and magnetic susceptibility multiscanning of drill cores (T2.1, T2.3). Importantly, the GSE is making available for DEXPLORE the Arbavere Field Research Station (ca. 70 km from Tallinn) containing all drill cores historically drilled in Estonia, basic field research equipment, drill core study facilities and a small conference center (up to 50 people) as well as advanced equipment as the Geotek MSCL-XYZ Workstation, high resolution line-scan camera with ASD spectrometer, Geotek XRF instrument and magnetic susceptibility sensor. In addition, GSE is leading the critical WP6 dedicated to the final validation of DEXPLORE technology leading also the Final Estonian mineral model - Data interpretation and resource assessment. On the other hand, DEXPLORE foresee the GSE active participation in the liaison with other Geological Surveys (EU and non-EU) for promoting the project results and their scalability ( in line with the goals of the topic - Increase the resources and reserves; Accelerate development of EU domestic exploration projects integrating innovative technologies; Strengthen EU autonomy and ethical sourcing by developing socially and environmentally acceptable means of discovery of primary RM; Improve responsible supply to the EU in line with the EU principles for sustainable RM (WP8). (10) ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL (ATM) – Spain. ATM is a fast-growing AIM and TSX-listed mining and development company which produces copper concentrates and silver as by-product. ATM’s main operation is Riotinto, which started in 2015 with an approach adapted to the most demanding standards in terms of sustainability and efficiency, reaching today a mine that processes approximately 15 million tons of ore/year to produce 250k tons of concentrate (55k tons of copper). This mine has become a driving force for the region, which has led to the socio-economic revitalization of the Riotinto Mining Basin. ATM is also exploring the nearby ore bodies, where it is possible to add value through breakthrough technologies such as the E-LIX system (owned by Lain Technologies) that would maximize the value of complex sulphides in the Riotinto District and the Pyrite Belt. The evaluation of high-grade brownfield ore bodies increases options and mine life. Moreover, ATM’s current operations include the Cerro Colorado open pit mine and a modern 15Mtpa processing plant, which has the potential to become a processing hub for owned regional projects and other external mines in the Andalusia region. ATM is also evaluating external opportunities that leverage core capabilities such as the new prospects in Pyrite Belt as Masa Valverde and other safe mining jurisdictions. ATM strives to become a leading multi-asset copper producer in Europe, maximizing the potential value of its current low-cost, low- risk assets and further exploring new opportunities. DEXPLORE role: ATM role is based on its active participation during WP4 and specifically in the calibration pilot at AMT’s Masa Valverde Mine (Iberian Pyrite Belt – Devonian volcanic and sediment-hosted massive sulphide (VSHMS) - pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena and cassiterite. Disseminated Cu, Zn, Pb), providing also existing geological information about petrophysics, geochemistry, mineral characterization, and ore models. Furthermore, ATM will also 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 38  Associated participate in the activities leading to increase the awareness of the general with document public about theRef. Ares(2024)6673353 importance - 20/09/2024 of the CRM in the European Energy Transition (T6.3 and WP8). (11) (MINERSA) – Spain. MINERSA is an international group of companies - 9 in total - that produce industrial minerals, chemical products, construction products, natural absorbents, and bleaching clays. Companies producing more than 1M tons/y of minerals and chemical products. Specifically, the fluorspar has been the backbone of MINERSA production activities since its early days, >70 years ago in Spain, continuously producing from a significant number of fluorite mines, today combining production in Spain and South Africa, standing as the World 2nd largest producer of acid grade fluorspar. MINERSA has a dedicated metallurgical research lab (CIM) to profit from, and to increase its unique wealth of experience in fluorspar mining and processing. Thanks to all the above and the daily work of the on-site production teams, MINERSA has earned a reputation as one of the most reliable and solid fluorspar producers in the world. In the commercial side, MINERSA treasures the largest customer base in acid grade fluorspar with customers located around the globe and in all market niches. DEXPLORE role: MINERSA role is based on its active participation during WP4 and specifically in the calibration pilot at MINERSA’s Fluorite Mine (Limestone between 500–600m and probably deeper along the contact between the limestone and the coverage) generating new geochemical data as needed and mainly providing existing geological information about petrophysics, geochemistry, mineral characterization, and ore models thanks to MINERSA strong dataset (i.e. >500 borehole logs e providing detailed stratigraphic and structural knowledge of the Permo-Jurassic Asturias Basin; >1000 geochemical analyses on core samples from drill holes and mine allowing for mapping the distribution of mineralization elements in the different deposits). Furthermore, MINERSA will also participate in the activities leading to increase the awareness of the general public about the importance of the CRM in the European energy transition (T6.3 and WP8). 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 39  4. Ethic self-assessment Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Ethical dimension of the objectives, methodology and likely impact DEXPLORE will exploit Al algorithms at two points: a) The potential role of Al in new lightweight optical methods for rapid and accurate identification and quantification of minerals in- field using UNICA's prototype (WP3) could be multifaceted and critical in enhancing the capabilities of the system. It is important to mention that the ML and algorithms involved in the data processing of UNICA's remote field- mineral detector are not involving any personal data thus avoiding any data protection issue and preventing unacceptable harm and safeguarding the physical and mental integrity of humans. The scope of Al integration is exclusively focused on providing reliable and accurate mineral information. b) The development of the XR applications (WPS), always following the strictest rules regarding Al defined by the EC. The algorithms will be used for detecting objects in the surroundings of the end-users utilizing the applications scanning functionalities for positional awareness. Al will not be involved in any activity considered critical (i.e., medical, official education, employment, credit scoring, legal, law, migration or democratic issues). METHODOLOGY To ensure that unintentional harm is prevented when using Al-based solutions, we will follow ethical recommendations defined by the Al High-Level Expert Group (HLEG), i.e. the Assessment List for Trustworthy Al (ALTAI). Thus, the design of Digital Twins and their simulations and predictions will follow the HLEG's Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, to address any ethical and Al technical robustness concerns. LIKELY IMPACT The project aims to generate Social, Ecological and Technological (SET) opportunities. To achieve this, the DEXPLORE team plans to strengthen its Advisory Board by including entities from allied countries of the EU, which will create cross-cultural collaborative opportunities. Moreover, DEXPLORE is fully committed to creating environmental benefits, and to this end, it implements advanced technological solutions - emission intelligence for manufacturing. The project will also consider ethical considerations and submit them for ethical agreements. The ethical guidelines will be communicated to the project partners and relevant stakeholders. Compliance with ethical principles and relevant legislation DEXPLORE prioritizes safety, accuracy, reliability, and privacy in its Al platform and Al-based technologies to improve exploration outcomes. We comply with EU directives related to Al, including Europe's Al Act, which reached a provisional agreement on harmonized rules on artificial intelligence in December 2023. The proposed Product Liability Directive (PLD) aims to establish rules for Al-driven products and services within the EU, which we will follow. To ensure that our Al platform and Al-enhanced technological solutions are aligned and robust, we will implement several measures. Firstly, we will prioritize technical robustness through rigorous testing, continuous monitoring, and error detection algorithms. This approach will allow us to identify and rectify any potential failures or inaccuracies. We will also prioritize user data privacy and security, and ensure transparency and accountability in Al development and usage. Additionally, we will apply quality assurance measures, including regular updates and bug fixes, to ensure accuracy and reproducibility. Secondly, we will consider cultural, ethical, and legal aspects of the context and environment to achieve social robustness. Exploration experts will train the Al language models by providing relevant text datasets and annotating them to indicate specific features. These experts will also fine-tune the model's performance by providing feedback and adjusting parameters. We will engage with regulators and the community to understand the social implications and incorporate 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 40  Associated feedback. To address biases and ensure fairness, transparency, andwith document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 accountability, we will conduct - 20/09/2024 an impact assessment. Thirdly, we will prioritize reliability and functionality by implementing fail-safe mechanisms and redundancies to minimize harm. We will adhere to industry best practices and security standards to protect user integrity. Regular audits and risk assessments will be conducted to identify vulnerabilities and ensure intended functionalities. Finally, we will use interpretable Al models to offer clear explanations for decision-making processes. Transparent algorithms and visualizations will enable users to understand and trust the system, while user-friendly interfaces and educational initiatives will improve awareness and understanding of the Al module's impact. 101178897 DEXPLORE – Part B – Page | 41  Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 HE Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)6673353 — Multi & Mono:-v1.2 20/09/2024 ANNEX 2 ESTIMATED BUDGET FOR THE ACTION Estimated eligible1 costs (per budget category) Estimated EU contribution2 Direct costs Indirect costs EU contribution to eligible costs Maximum B. Total costs Maximum EU D. Other cost Requested EU grant amount6 A. Personnel costs Subcontracting C. Purchase costs E. Indirect costs 3 Funding rate %4 categories contribution5 contribution costs A.1 Employees (or equivalent) A.4 SME owners A.6 Personnel unit B. Subcontracting C.1 Travel and C.2 Equipment C.3 Other goods, D.2 Internally E. Indirect costs and natural person cost subsistence works and invoiced goods A.2 Natural persons under direct beneficiaries services and services contract A.3 Seconded persons Unit costs (usual Unit costs (usual Forms of funding Actual costs accounting Unit costs7 Unit costs7 Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs accounting Flat-rate costs8 practices) practices) e = 0,25 * (a1 a1 a2 a3 a5 b c1 c2 c3 d2 + a2 + a3 + a5 f = a+b+c+d+e U g = f * U% h m + c1 + c2 + c3) 1 - ISMC 263 310.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28 000.00 0.00 127 000.00 0.00 104 577.50 522 887.50 100 522 887.50 522 887.50 522 887.50 1.1 - ICAMCYL 128 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20 000.00 0.00 50 000.00 0.00 49 500.00 247 500.00 100 247 500.00 247 500.00 247 500.00 2 - ICCS 348 100.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 000.00 0.00 13 000.00 0.00 93 275.00 466 375.00 100 466 375.00 466 375.00 466 375.00 2.1 - CogniSensus 55 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10 000.00 0.00 2 000.00 0.00 16 750.00 83 750.00 100 83 750.00 83 750.00 83 750.00 3 - UNICA 247 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 000.00 0.00 25 000.00 0.00 75 500.00 377 500.00 100 377 500.00 377 500.00 377 500.00 4 - CORE IC 297 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12 000.00 4 000.00 8 000.00 0.00 80 250.00 401 250.00 100 401 250.00 401 250.00 401 250.00 5 - TalTech 319 113.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 000.00 12 000.00 8 000.00 65 850.00 0.00 101 240.75 517 203.75 100 517 203.75 517 203.75 517 203.75 6 - MNLT 99 000.00 0.00 94 500.00 0.00 0.00 15 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 125.00 260 625.00 100 260 625.00 260 625.00 260 625.00 7 - Terradat 269 280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 49 000.00 5 000.00 2 000.00 0.00 81 320.00 406 600.00 100 406 600.00 406 600.00 406 600.00 8 - XCALIBUR 386 080.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42 530.00 120 000.00 60 000.00 0.00 152 152.50 760 762.50 100 760 762.50 760 762.50 760 762.50 9 - EGT 304 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11 000.00 0.00 14 500.00 0.00 82 375.00 411 875.00 100 411 875.00 411 875.00 411 875.00 10 - ATALAYA MINING 68 600.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 000.00 0.00 4 000.00 0.00 20 150.00 100 750.00 100 100 750.00 100 750.00 100 750.00 11 - MINER SA 61 920.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8 000.00 2 000.00 11 000.00 8 700.00 20 730.00 112 350.00 100 112 350.00 112 350.00 112 350.00 Total consortium 2 846 403.00 0.00 94 500.00 0.00 11 000.00 257 530.00 139 000.00 382 350.00 8 700.00 929 945.75 4 669 428.75 4 669 428.75 4 669 428.75 4 669 428.75 1 See Article 6 for the eligibility conditions. All amounts must be expressed in EUR (see Article 21 for the conversion rules). 2 The consortium remains free to decide on a different internal distribution of the EU funding (via the consortium agreement; see Article 7). 3 Indirect costs already covered by an operating grant (received under any EU funding programme) are ineligible (see Article 6.3). Therefore, a beneficiary/affiliated entity that receives an operating grant during the action duration cannot declare indirect costs for the year(s)/reporting period(s) covered by the operating grant, unless they can demonstrate that the operating grant does not cover any costs of the action. This requires specific accounting tools. Please immediately contact us via the EU Funding & Tenders Portal for details. 4 See Data Sheet for the funding rate(s). 5 This is the theoretical amount of the EU contribution to costs, if the reimbursement rate is applied to all the budgeted costs. This theoretical amount is then capped by the 'maximum grant amount'. 6 The 'maximum grant amount' is the maximum grant amount decided by the EU. It normally corresponds to the requested grant, but may be lower. 7 See Annex 2a 'Additional information on the estimated budget' for the details (units, cost per unit). 8 See Data Sheet for the flat-rate. Page 1 of 1  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 2a ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON UNIT COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary See Additional information on unit costs and contributions (Annex 2a and 2b) HE and Euratom personnel unit cost See Additional information on unit costs and contributions (Annex 2a and 2b) HE and Euratom Research Infrastructure actions See Additional information on unit costs and contributions (Annex 2a and 2b) Euratom staff mobility costs See Additional information on unit costs and contributions (Annex 2a and 2b) 1 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES EREVNITIKO PANEPISTIMIAKO INSTITOUTO SYSTIMATON EPIKOINONION KAI YPOLOGISTON (ICCS), PIC 999654356, established in PATISION 42, ATHINA 106 82, Greece, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-999654356_75_210--] Ioannis Psarras with ECAS id n008mjcu signed in the Participant Portal on 20/09/2024 at 18:22:32 (transaction id SigId-69495-9KDnP7 WCMt03mT1VL7xQD0NYqTORW0xS7Xud90BCyzkyosqCUhH2ajMYU WvCfN0KufLulwcBy53Z8gzxvt0yyu-rS0vSrmBGYCcxSNg4ep5za-zMIc Y546bIe35RdFGu7UoEBrbxUzOccaaegyFDmA73QzuvjtbgmfiZgzhpsv EIcAWUSLx3QMogwozMUwAlW1Ope). Timestamp by third party at 2024.09.20 18:22:36 CEST 1 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI CAGLIARI (UNICA), PIC 999841663, established in VIA UNIVERSITA 40, CAGLIARI 09124, Italy, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-999841663_75_210--] 2 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES CORE KENTRO KAINOTOMIAS AMKE (CORE IC), PIC 891712756, established in DELAGRAMMATIKA 5, HALKIDA 341 00, Greece, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-891712756_75_210--] 3 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL (TalTech), PIC 999842536, established in EHITAJATE TEE 5, TALLINN 19086, Estonia, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-999842536_75_210--] 4 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES MNLT INNOVATIONS IKE (MNLT), PIC 902617787, established in KIFISSIAS 125-127, ATHENS 11524, Greece, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-902617787_75_210--] 5 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES TERRADAT GEOPHYSICS SL (Terradat), PIC 879574855, established in AV. CRISTO DE LAS CADENAS, 113, 1A, OVIEDO 33006, Spain, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-879574855_75_210--] 6 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES XCALIBUR MPH SPAIN SL (XCALIBUR), PIC 885111518, established in AVDA PARTENON 10, MADRID 28042, Spain, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-885111518_75_210--] 7 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES EESTI GEOLOOGIATEENISTUS (EGT), PIC 907275533, established in KREUTZWALDI TN 5, RAKVERE 44314, Estonia, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-907275533_75_210--] Sirli Sipp Kulli with ECAS id n007yysf signed in the Participant Portal on 22/09/2024 at 16:35:40 (transaction id SigId-70842-qlRDBaddhD AOsL0NHKYxmqgwZFAwHRNU0o6Hvp0zrrjuv8HZoWzZyFMjt9inqJD YzHjt58pRZg7A5um407lp2nm-rS0vSrmBGYCcxSNg4ep5za-yapOPpR eJv1fMU65Iqg1NEVMnxfXEPHe6ZEDlnG7KsPiWfIUj9GWLLfO3GO41 U4daqhdm81LwZyOsaskQPXPeW). Timestamp by third party at 2024.09.22 16:35:45 CEST 8 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES ATALAYA RIOTINTO MINERA SL (ATALAYA MINING), PIC 915360192, established in CALLE LA DEHESA S/N, MINAS DE RIOTINTO 21660, Spain, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-915360192_75_210--] 9 Grant Agreement number: 101178897 — DEXPLORE — HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 3 ACCESSION FORM FOR BENEFICIARIES MINERALES Y PRODUCTOS DERIVADOS SA (MINER SA), PIC 913325326, established in AVENIDA ALGORTA 16, GETXO 48992, Spain, hereby agrees to become beneficiary in Agreement No 101178897 — DEXPLORE (‘the Agreement’) between CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER (ISMC) and the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and mandates the coordinator to submit and sign in its name and on its behalf any amendments to the Agreement, in accordance with Article 39. By signing this accession form, the beneficiary accepts the grant and agrees to implement it in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. SIGNATURE For the beneficiary [--TGSMark#signature-913325326_75_210--] 10  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 4 HORIZON EUROPE MGA — MULTI + MONO FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR [PARTICIPANT NAME] FOR REPORTING PERIOD [NUMBER] 1 2 Eligible costs (per budget category) EU contribution Revenues Direct costs Indirect costs EU contribution to eligible costs Total requested EU Income generated by the Total costs contribution action 2 3 4 Requested EU A. Personnel costs B. Subcontracting costs C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories E. Indirect costs Funding rate % Maximum EU contribution contribution [OPTION for HE ERC [ D.3 Transnational [OPTION for Euratom A.4 SME owners and [ D.4 Virtual access to [OPTION for HE [OPTION for HE ERC Grants: D.8 ERC additional C.3 Other goods, works and [ D.1 Financial support to D.2 Internally invoiced access to research Programme Cofund Actions: A.1 Employees (or equivalent) natural person A.6 Personnel unit cost B. Subcontracting C.1 Travel and subsistence C.2 Equipment research infrastructure PCP/PPI: D.5 PCP/PPI Grants: D.7 ERC additional funding (subcontracting, FSTP E. Indirect costs services third parties] goods and services infrastructure unit costs D.6 Euratom Cofund staff beneficiaries unit costs ] procurement costs] funding] and internally invoiced goods ] mobility costs] and services)] A.2 Natural persons under direct contract A.3 Seconded persons Unit costs (usual 5 5 Unit costs (usual 5 5 5 6 Forms of funding Actual costs accounting Unit costs Unit costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs Actual costs [ Actual costs] [ Unit costs ] [ Unit costs ] [ Actual costs] [ Unit costs ] [ Actual costs] [ Actual costs] Flat-rate costs accounting practices) practices) e= 0,25 * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b + f= a1 a2 a3 a5 b c1 c2 c3 [ d1a] d2 [ d3] [ d4] [ d5] [ d6] [ d7] [ d8] U g = f*U% h m (i) n c1 +c2 + c3 + d1a + d2 + d3 + d4 a+b+c+d+e [ + d5][+ d6] [ +d7] [+ d8] ) XX – [short name beneficiary/affiliated entity] The beneficiary/affiliated entity hereby confirms that: The information provided is complete, reliable and true. The costs and contributions declared are eligible (see Article 6). The costs and contributions can be substantiated by adequate records and supporting documentation that will be produced upon request or in the context of checks, reviews, audits and investigations (see Articles 19, 20 and 25). For the last reporting period: that all the revenues have been declared (see Article 22). i Please declare all eligible costs and contributions, even if they exceed the amounts indicated in the estimated budget (see Annex 2). Only amounts that were declared in your individual financial statements can be taken into account lateron, in order to replace costs/contributions that are found to be ineligible. 1 See Article 6 for the eligibility conditions. All amounts must be expressed in EUR (see Article 21 for the conversion rules). 2 If you have also received an EU operating grant during this reporting period, you cannot claim indirect costs - unless you can demonstrate that the operating grant does not cover any costs of the action. This requires specific accounting tools. Please contact us immediately via the Funding & Tenders Portal for details. 3 See Data Sheet for the reimbursement rate(s). 4 This is the theoretical amount of EU contribution to costs that the system calculates automatically (by multiplying the reimbursement rates by the costs declared). The amount you request (in the column 'requested EU contribution') may be less. 5 See Annex 2a 'Additional information on the estimated budget' for the details (units, cost per unit). 6 See Data Sheet for the flat-rate.  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 ANNEX 5 SPECIFIC RULES CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY (— ARTICLE 13) Sensitive information with security recommendation Sensitive information with a security recommendation must comply with the additional requirements imposed by the granting authority. Before starting the action tasks concerned, the beneficiaries must have obtained all approvals or other mandatory documents needed for implementing the task. The documents must be kept on file and be submitted upon request by the coordinator to the granting authority. If they are not in English, they must be submitted together with an English summary. For requirements restricting disclosure or dissemination, the information must be handled in accordance with the recommendation and may be disclosed or disseminated only after written approval from the granting authority. EU classified information If EU classified information is used or generated by the action, it must be treated in accordance with the security classification guide (SCG) and security aspect letter (SAL) set out in Annex 1 and Decision 2015/4441 and its implementing rules — until it is declassified. Deliverables which contain EU classified information must be submitted according to special procedures agreed with the granting authority. Action tasks involving EU classified information may be subcontracted only with prior explicit written approval from the granting authority and only to entities established in an EU Member State or in a non-EU country with a security of information agreement with the EU (or an administrative arrangement with the Commission). EU classified information may not be disclosed to any third party (including participants involved in the action implementation) without prior explicit written approval from the granting authority. ETHICS (— ARTICLE 14) Ethics and research integrity The beneficiaries must carry out the action in compliance with: - ethical principles (including the highest standards of research integrity) 1 Commission Decision 2015/444/EC, Euratom of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 53). 1  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 and - applicable EU, international and national law, including the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and its Supplementary Protocols. No funding can be granted, within or outside the EU, for activities that are prohibited in all Member States. No funding can be granted in a Member State for an activity which is forbidden in that Member State. The beneficiaries must pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality, the right to privacy, the right to the protection of personal data, the right to the physical and mental integrity of persons, the right to non-discrimination, the need to ensure protection of the environment and high levels of human health protection. The beneficiaries must ensure that the activities under the action have an exclusive focus on civil applications. The beneficiaries must ensure that the activities under the action do not: - aim at human cloning for reproductive purposes - intend to modify the genetic heritage of human beings which could make such modifications heritable (with the exception of research relating to cancer treatment of the gonads, which may be financed) - intend to create human embryos solely for the purpose of research or for the purpose of stem cell procurement, including by means of somatic cell nuclear transfer, or - lead to the destruction of human embryos (for example, for obtaining stem cells). Activities involving research on human embryos or human embryonic stem cells may be carried out only if: - they are set out in Annex 1 or - the coordinator has obtained explicit approval (in writing) from the granting authority. In addition, the beneficiaries must respect the fundamental principle of research integrity — 2 as set out in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity . This implies compliance with the following principles: - reliability in ensuring the quality of research reflected in the design, the methodology, the analysis and the use of resources - honesty in developing, undertaking, reviewing, reporting and communicating research in a transparent, fair and unbiased way - respect for colleagues, research participants, society, ecosystems, cultural heritage and the environment 2 European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity of ALLEA (All European Academies). 2  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 - accountability for the research from idea to publication, for its management and organisation, for training, supervision and mentoring, and for its wider impacts and means that beneficiaries must ensure that persons carrying out research tasks follow the good research practices including ensuring, where possible, openness, reproducibility and traceability and refrain from the research integrity violations described in the Code. Activities raising ethical issues must comply with the additional requirements formulated by the ethics panels (including after checks, reviews or audits; see Article 25). Before starting an action task raising ethical issues, the beneficiaries must have obtained all approvals or other mandatory documents needed for implementing the task, notably from any (national or local) ethics committee or other bodies such as data protection authorities. The documents must be kept on file and be submitted upon request by the coordinator to the granting authority. If they are not in English, they must be submitted together with an English summary, which shows that the documents cover the action tasks in question and includes the conclusions of the committee or authority concerned (if any). VALUES (— ARTICLE 14) Gender mainstreaming The beneficiaries must take all measures to promote equal opportunities between men and women in the implementation of the action and, where applicable, in line with the gender equality plan. They must aim, to the extent possible, for a gender balance at all levels of personnel assigned to the action, including at supervisory and managerial level. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS — ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE (— ARTICLE 16) Definitions Access rights — Rights to use results or background. Dissemination — The public disclosure of the results by appropriate means, other than resulting from protecting or exploiting the results, including by scientific publications in any medium. Exploit(ation) — The use of results in further research and innovation activities other than those covered by the action concerned, including among other things, commercial exploitation such as developing, creating, manufacturing and marketing a product or process, creating and providing a service, or in standardisation activities. Fair and reasonable conditions — Appropriate conditions, including possible financial terms or royalty-free conditions, taking into account the specific circumstances of the request for access, for example the actual or potential value of the results or background to which access is requested and/or the scope, duration or other characteristics of the exploitation envisaged. FAIR principles — ‘findability’, ‘accessibility’, ‘interoperability’ and ‘reusability’. Open access — Online access to research outputs provided free of charge to the end-user. 3  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Open science — An approach to the scientific process based on open cooperative work, tools and diffusing knowledge. Research data management — The process within the research lifecycle that includes the organisation, storage, preservation, security, quality assurance, allocation of persistent identifiers (PIDs) and rules and procedures for sharing of data including licensing. Research outputs — Results to which access can be given in the form of scientific publications, data or other engineered results and processes such as software, algorithms, protocols, models, workflows and electronic notebooks. Scope of the obligations For this section, references to ‘beneficiary’ or ‘beneficiaries’ do not include affiliated entities (if any). Agreement on background — Background free from restrictions The beneficiaries must identify in a written agreement the background as needed for implementing the action or for exploiting its results. Where the call conditions restrict control due to strategic interests reasons, background that is subject to control or other restrictions by a country (or entity from a country) which is not one of the eligible countries or target countries set out in the call conditions and that impact the exploitation of the results (i.e. would make the exploitation of the results subject to control or restrictions) must not be used and must be explicitly excluded in the agreement on background — unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority. Results free from restrictions Where the call conditions restrict control due to strategic interests reasons, the beneficiaries must ensure that the results of the action are not subject to control or other restrictions by a country (or entity from a country) which is not one of the eligible countries or target countries set out in the call conditions — unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority. Ownership of results Results are owned by the beneficiaries that generate them. However, two or more beneficiaries own results jointly if: - they have jointly generated them and - it is not possible to: - establish the respective contribution of each beneficiary, or - separate them for the purpose of applying for, obtaining or maintaining their protection. The joint owners must agree — in writing — on the allocation and terms of exercise of their joint ownership (‘joint ownership agreement’), to ensure compliance with their obligations under this Agreement. 4  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Unless otherwise agreed in the joint ownership agreement or consortium agreement, each joint owner may grant non-exclusive licences to third parties to exploit the jointly-owned results (without any right to sub-license), if the other joint owners are given: - at least 45 days advance notice and - fair and reasonable compensation. The joint owners may agree — in writing — to apply another regime than joint ownership. If third parties (including employees and other personnel) may claim rights to the results, the beneficiary concerned must ensure that those rights can be exercised in a manner compatible with its obligations under the Agreement. The beneficiaries must indicate the owner(s) of the results (results ownership list) in the final periodic report. Protection of results Beneficiaries which have received funding under the grant must adequately protect their results — for an appropriate period and with appropriate territorial coverage — if protection is possible and justified, taking into account all relevant considerations, including the prospects for commercial exploitation, the legitimate interests of the other beneficiaries and any other legitimate interests. Exploitation of results Beneficiaries which have received funding under the grant must — up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1) — use their best efforts to exploit their results directly or to have them exploited indirectly by another entity, in particular through transfer or licensing. If, despite a beneficiary’s best efforts, the results are not exploited within one year after the end of the action, the beneficiaries must (unless otherwise agreed in writing with the granting authority) use the Horizon Results Platform to find interested parties to exploit the results. If results are incorporated in a standard, the beneficiaries must (unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority or unless it is impossible) ask the standardisation body to include the funding statement (see Article 17) in (information related to) the standard. Additional exploitation obligations Where the call conditions impose additional exploitation obligations (including obligations linked to the restriction of participation or control due to strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security reasons), the beneficiaries must comply with them — up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1). Where the call conditions impose additional exploitation obligations in case of a public emergency, the beneficiaries must (if requested by the granting authority) grant for a limited period of time specified in the request, non-exclusive licences — under fair and reasonable conditions — to their results to legal entities that need the results to address the public emergency and commit to rapidly and broadly exploit the resulting products and services at fair and reasonable conditions. This provision applies up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1). 5  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Additional information obligation relating to standards Where the call conditions impose additional information obligations relating to possible standardisation, the beneficiaries must — up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1) — inform the granting authority, if the results could reasonably be expected to contribute to European or international standards. Transfer and licensing of results Transfer of ownership The beneficiaries may transfer ownership of their results, provided this does not affect compliance with their obligations under the Agreement. The beneficiaries must ensure that their obligations under the Agreement regarding their results are passed on to the new owner and that this new owner has the obligation to pass them on in any subsequent transfer. Moreover, they must inform the other beneficiaries with access rights of the transfer at least 45 days in advance (or less if agreed in writing), unless agreed otherwise in writing for specifically identified third parties including affiliated entities or unless impossible under the applicable law. This notification must include sufficient information on the new owner to enable the beneficiaries concerned to assess the effects on their access rights. The beneficiaries may object within 30 days of receiving notification (or less if agreed in writing), if they can show that the transfer would adversely affect their access rights. In this case, the transfer may not take place until agreement has been reached between the beneficiaries concerned. Granting licences The beneficiaries may grant licences to their results (or otherwise give the right to exploit them), including on an exclusive basis, provided this does not affect compliance with their obligations. Exclusive licences for results may be granted only if all the other beneficiaries concerned have waived their access rights. Granting authority right to object to transfers or licensing — Horizon Europe actions Where the call conditions in Horizon Europe actions provide for the right to object to transfers or licensing, the granting authority may — up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1) — object to a transfer of ownership or the exclusive licensing of results, if: - the beneficiaries which generated the results have received funding under the grant - it is to a legal entity established in a non-EU country not associated with Horizon Europe, and - the granting authority considers that the transfer or licence is not in line with EU interests. Beneficiaries that intend to transfer ownership or grant an exclusive licence must formally notify the granting authority before the intended transfer or licensing takes place and: 6  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 - identify the specific results concerned - describe in detail the new owner or licensee and the planned or potential exploitation of the results, and - include a reasoned assessment of the likely impact of the transfer or licence on EU interests, in particular regarding competitiveness as well as consistency with ethical principles and security considerations. The granting authority may request additional information. If the granting authority decides to object to a transfer or exclusive licence, it must formally notify the beneficiary concerned within 60 days of receiving notification (or any additional information it has requested). No transfer or licensing may take place in the following cases: - pending the granting authority decision, within the period set out above - if the granting authority objects - until the conditions are complied with, if the granting authority objection comes with conditions. A beneficiary may formally notify a request to waive the right to object regarding intended transfers or grants to a specifically identified third party, if measures safeguarding EU interests are in place. If the granting authority agrees, it will formally notify the beneficiary concerned within 60 days of receiving notification (or any additional information requested). Granting authority right to object to transfers or licensing — Euratom actions Where the call conditions in Euratom actions provide for the right to object to transfers or licensing, the granting authority may — up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1) — object to a transfer of ownership or the exclusive or non-exclusive licensing of results, if: - the beneficiaries which generated the results have received funding under the grant - it is to a legal entity established in a non-EU country not associated to the Euratom Research and Training Programme 2021-2025 and - the granting authority considers that the transfer or licence is not in line with the EU interests. Beneficiaries that intend to transfer ownership or grant a licence must formally notify the granting authority before the intended transfer or licensing takes place and: - identify the specific results concerned - describe in detail the results, the new owner or licensee and the planned or potential exploitation of the results, and - include a reasoned assessment of the likely impact of the transfer or licence on EU interests, in particular regarding competitiveness as well as consistency with ethical principles and security considerations (including the defence interests of the EU Member States under Article 24 of the Euratom Treaty). 7  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 The granting authority may request additional information. If the granting authority decides to object to a transfer or licence, it will formally notify the beneficiary concerned within 60 days of receiving notification (or any additional information requested). No transfer or licensing may take place in the following cases: - pending the granting authority decision, within the period set out above - if the granting authority objects - until the conditions are complied with, if the granting authority objection comes with conditions. A beneficiary may formally notify a request to waive the right to object regarding intended transfers or grants to a specifically identified third party, if measures safeguarding EU interests are in place. If the granting authority agrees, it will formally notify the beneficiary concerned within 60 days of receiving notification (or any additional information requested). Limitations to transfers and licensing due to strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security reasons of the EU and its Member States Where the call conditions restrict participation or control due to strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security reasons, the beneficiaries may not transfer ownership of their results or grant licences to third parties which are established in countries which are not eligible countries or target countries set out in the call conditions (or, if applicable, are controlled by such countries or entities from such countries) — unless they have requested and received prior approval by the granting authority. The request must: - identify the specific results concerned - describe in detail the new owner or licensee and the planned or potential exploitation of the results, and - include a reasoned assessment of the likely impact of the transfer or license on the strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security of the EU and its Member States. The granting authority may request additional information. Access rights to results and background Exercise of access rights — Waiving of access rights — No sub-licensing Requests to exercise access rights and the waiver of access rights must be in writing. Unless agreed otherwise in writing with the beneficiary granting access, access rights do not include the right to sub-license. If a beneficiary is no longer involved in the action, this does not affect its obligations to grant access. If a beneficiary defaults on its obligations, the beneficiaries may agree that that beneficiary no longer has access rights. 8  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Access rights for implementing the action The beneficiaries must grant each other access — on a royalty-free basis — to background needed to implement their own tasks under the action, unless the beneficiary that holds the background has — before acceding to the Agreement —: - informed the other beneficiaries that access to its background is subject to restrictions, or - agreed with the other beneficiaries that access would not be on a royalty-free basis. The beneficiaries must grant each other access — on a royalty-free basis — to results needed for implementing their own tasks under the action. Access rights for exploiting the results The beneficiaries must grant each other access — under fair and reasonable conditions — to results needed for exploiting their results. The beneficiaries must grant each other access — under fair and reasonable conditions — to background needed for exploiting their results, unless the beneficiary that holds the background has — before acceding to the Agreement — informed the other beneficiaries that access to its background is subject to restrictions. Requests for access must be made — unless agreed otherwise in writing — up to one year after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1). Access rights for entities under the same control Unless agreed otherwise in writing by the beneficiaries, access to results and, subject to the restrictions referred to above (if any), background must also be granted — under fair and reasonable conditions — to entities that: - are established in an EU Member State or Horizon Europe associated country - are under the direct or indirect control of another beneficiary, or under the same direct or indirect control as that beneficiary, or directly or indirectly controlling that beneficiary and - need the access to exploit the results of that beneficiary. Unless agreed otherwise in writing, such requests for access must be made by the entity directly to the beneficiary concerned. Requests for access must be made — unless agreed otherwise in writing — up to one year after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1). Access rights for the granting authority, EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies and national authorities to results for policy purposes — Horizon Europe actions In Horizon Europe actions, the beneficiaries which have received funding under the grant must grant access to their results — on a royalty-free basis — to the granting authority, EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies for developing, implementing and monitoring EU policies or programmes. Such access rights do not extend to beneficiaries’ background. Such access rights are limited to non-commercial and non-competitive use. 9  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 For actions under the cluster ‘Civil Security for Society’, such access rights also extend to national authorities of EU Member States for developing, implementing and monitoring their policies or programmes in this area. In this case, access is subject to a bilateral agreement to define specific conditions ensuring that: - the access rights will be used only for the intended purpose and - appropriate confidentiality obligations are in place. Moreover, the requesting national authority or EU institution, body, office or agency (including the granting authority) must inform all other national authorities of such a request. Access rights for the granting authority, Euratom institutions, funding bodies or the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy — Euratom actions In Euratom actions, the beneficiaries which have received funding under the grant must grant access to their results — on a royalty-free basis — to the granting authority, Euratom institutions, funding bodies or the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy for developing, implementing and monitoring Euratom policies and programmes or for compliance with obligations assumed through international cooperation with non-EU countries and international organisations. Such access rights include the right to authorise third parties to use the results in public procurement and the right to sub-license and are limited to non-commercial and non- competitive use. Additional access rights Where the call conditions impose additional access rights, the beneficiaries must comply with them. COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION, OPEN SCIENCE AND VISIBILITY (— ARTICLE 17) Dissemination Dissemination of results The beneficiaries must disseminate their results as soon as feasible, in a publicly available format, subject to any restrictions due to the protection of intellectual property, security rules or legitimate interests. A beneficiary that intends to disseminate its results must give at least 15 days advance notice to the other beneficiaries (unless agreed otherwise), together with sufficient information on the results it will disseminate. Any other beneficiary may object within (unless agreed otherwise) 15 days of receiving notification, if it can show that its legitimate interests in relation to the results or background would be significantly harmed. In such cases, the results may not be disseminated unless appropriate steps are taken to safeguard those interests. Additional dissemination obligations Where the call conditions impose additional dissemination obligations, the beneficiaries must also comply with those. 10  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 Open Science Open science: open access to scientific publications The beneficiaries must ensure open access to peer-reviewed scientific publications relating to their results. In particular, they must ensure that: - at the latest at the time of publication, a machine-readable electronic copy of the published version or the final peer-reviewed manuscript accepted for publication, is deposited in a trusted repository for scientific publications - immediate open access is provided to the deposited publication via the repository, under the latest available version of the Creative Commons Attribution International Public Licence (CC BY) or a licence with equivalent rights; for monographs and other long-text formats, the licence may exclude commercial uses and derivative works (e.g. CC BY-NC, CC BY-ND) and - information is given via the repository about any research output or any other tools and instruments needed to validate the conclusions of the scientific publication. Beneficiaries (or authors) must retain sufficient intellectual property rights to comply with the open access requirements. Metadata of deposited publications must be open under a Creative Common Public Domain Dedication (CC 0) or equivalent, in line with the FAIR principles (in particular machine- actionable) and provide information at least about the following: publication (author(s), title, date of publication, publication venue); Horizon Europe or Euratom funding; grant project name, acronym and number; licensing terms; persistent identifiers for the publication, the authors involved in the action and, if possible, for their organisations and the grant. Where applicable, the metadata must include persistent identifiers for any research output or any other tools and instruments needed to validate the conclusions of the publication. Only publication fees in full open access venues for scientific publications are eligible for reimbursement. Open science: research data management The beneficiaries must manage the digital research data generated in the action (‘data’) responsibly, in line with the FAIR principles and by taking all of the following actions: - establish a data management plan (‘DMP’) (and regularly update it) - as soon as possible and within the deadlines set out in the DMP, deposit the data in a trusted repository; if required in the call conditions, this repository must be federated in the EOSC in compliance with EOSC requirements - as soon as possible and within the deadlines set out in the DMP, ensure open access — via the repository — to the deposited data, under the latest available version of the Creative Commons Attribution International Public License (CC BY) or Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication (CC 0) or a licence/dedication with equivalent rights, following the principle ‘as open as possible as closed as necessary’, unless providing open access would in particular: - be against the beneficiary’s legitimate interests, including regarding commercial exploitation, or 11  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 - be contrary to any other constraints, in particular the EU competitive interests or the beneficiary’s obligations under this Agreement; if open access is not provided (to some or all data), this must be justified in the DMP - provide information via the repository about any research output or any other tools and instruments needed to re-use or validate the data. Metadata of deposited data must be open under a Creative Common Public Domain Dedication (CC 0) or equivalent (to the extent legitimate interests or constraints are safeguarded), in line with the FAIR principles (in particular machine-actionable) and provide information at least about the following: datasets (description, date of deposit, author(s) and embargo); Horizon Europe or Euratom funding; grant project name, acronym and number; licensing terms; persistent identifiers for the dataset, the authors involved in the action, and, if possible, for their organisations and the grant. Where applicable, the metadata must include persistent identifiers for related publications and other research outputs. Open science: additional practices Where the call conditions impose additional obligations regarding open science practices, the beneficiaries must also comply with those. Where the call conditions impose additional obligations regarding the validation of scientific publications, the beneficiaries must provide (digital or physical) access to data or other results needed for validation of the conclusions of scientific publications, to the extent that their legitimate interests or constraints are safeguarded (and unless they already provided (open) access at publication). Where the call conditions impose additional open science obligations in case of a public emergency, the beneficiaries must (if requested by the granting authority) immediately deposit any research output in a trusted repository and provide open access to it under a CC BY licence, a Public Domain Dedication (CC 0) or equivalent. As an exception, if the access would be against the beneficiaries’ legitimate interests, the beneficiaries must grant non- exclusive licenses — under fair and reasonable conditions — to legal entities that need the research output to address the public emergency and commit to rapidly and broadly exploit the resulting products and services at fair and reasonable conditions. This provision applies up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1). Plan for the exploitation and dissemination of results including communication activities Unless excluded by the call conditions, the beneficiaries must provide and regularly update a plan for the exploitation and dissemination of results including communication activities. SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION (— ARTICLE 18) Implementation in case of restrictions due to strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security of the EU and its Member States Where the call conditions restrict participation or control due to strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security, the beneficiaries must ensure that none of the entities that participate as affiliated entities, associated partners, third parties giving in-kind contributions, subcontractors or recipients of financial support to third parties are established in countries which are not eligible countries or target countries set out in the call conditions (or, if applicable, are controlled by such countries or entities from such countries) — unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority. 12  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 The beneficiaries must moreover ensure that any cooperation with entities established in countries which are not eligible countries or target countries set out in the call conditions (or, if applicable, are controlled by such countries or entities from such countries) does not affect the strategic assets, interests, autonomy or security of the EU and its Member States. Recruitment and working conditions for researchers The beneficiaries must take all measures to implement the principles set out in Annex II to the Council Recommendation on a European framework to attract and retain research, innovation and entrepreneurial talents in Europe3 (‘the European Charter for Researchers’), in particular regarding: - working conditions - transparent recruitment processes based on merit, and - career development. The beneficiaries must ensure that researchers and all participants involved in the action are aware of them. Specific rules for access to research infrastructure activities Definitions Research Infrastructures — Facilities that provide resources and services for the research communities to conduct research and foster innovation in their fields. This definition includes the associated human resources, and it covers major equipment or sets of instruments; knowledge-related facilities such as collections, archives or scientific data infrastructures; computing systems, communication networks, and any other infrastructure, of a unique nature and open to external users, essential to achieve excellence in research and innovation. Where relevant, they may be used beyond research, for example for education or public services, and they may be ‘single-sited’, ‘virtual’ or ‘distributed’4: When implementing access to research infrastructure activities, the beneficiaries must respect the following conditions: - for transnational access: - access which must be provided: The access must be free of charge, transnational access to research infrastructure or installations for selected user-groups. The access must include the logistical, technological and scientific support and the specific training that is usually provided to external researchers using the 3 Council Recommendation C/2023/1640 of 18 December 2023 on a European framework to attract and retain research, innovation and entrepreneurial talents in Europe, Annex II (OJ C, C/2023/1640, 29.12.2023). 4 See Article 2(1) of the Horizon Europe Framework Programme Regulation 2021/695. 13  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 infrastructure. Transnational access can be either in person (hands-on), provided to selected users that visit the installation to make use of it, or remote, through the provision to selected user-groups of remote scientific services (e.g. provision of reference materials or samples, remote access to a high-performance computing facility). - categories of users that may have access: Transnational access must be provided to selected user-groups, i.e. teams of one or more researchers (users). The majority of the users must work in a country other than the country(ies) where the installation is located (unless access is provided by an international organisation, the Joint Research Centre (JRC), an ERIC or similar legal entity). Only user groups that are allowed to disseminate the results they have generated under the action may benefit from the access (unless the users are working for SMEs). Access for user groups with a majority of users not working in a EU Member State or Horizon Europe associated country is limited to 20% of the total amount of units of access provided under the grant (unless a higher percentage is foreseen in Annex 1). - procedure and criteria for selecting user groups: The user groups must request access by submitting (in writing) a description of the work that they wish to carry out and the names, nationalities and home institutions of the users. The user groups must be selected by (one or more) selection panels set up by the consortium. The selection panels must be composed of international experts in the field, at least half of them independent from the consortium (unless otherwise specified in Annex 1). The selection panels must assess all proposals received and recommend a short- list of the user groups that should benefit from access. The selection panels must base their selection on scientific merit, taking into account that priority should be given to user groups composed of users who: - have not previously used the installation and - are working in countries where no equivalent research infrastructure exist. It will apply the principles of transparency, fairness and impartiality. Where the call conditions impose additional rules for the selection of user groups, the beneficiaries must also comply with those. - other conditions: 14  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 The beneficiaries must request written approval from the granting authority for the selection of user groups requiring visits to the installations exceeding 3 months (unless such visits are foreseen in Annex 1). In addition, the beneficiaries must: - advertise widely, including on a their websites, the access offered under the Agreement - promote equal opportunities in advertising the access and take into account the gender dimension when defining the support provided to users - ensure that users comply with the terms and conditions of the Agreement - ensure that its obligations under Articles 12, 13, 17 and 33 also apply to the users - keep records of the names, nationalities, and home institutions of users, as well as the nature and quantity of access provided to them - for virtual access: - access which must be provided: The access must be free of charge, virtual access to research infrastructure or installations. ‘Virtual access’ means open and free access through communication networks to digital resources and services needed for research, without selecting the users to whom access is provided. The access must include the support that is usually provided to external users. Where allowed by the call conditions, beneficiaries may in justified cases define objective eligibility criteria (e.g. affiliation to a research or academic institution) for specific users. - other conditions: The beneficiaries must have the virtual access services assessed periodically by a board composed of international experts in the field, at least half of whom must be independent from the consortium (unless otherwise specified in Annex 1). For this purpose, information and statistics on the users and the nature and quantity of the access provided, must be made available to the board. The beneficiaries must advertise widely, including on a dedicated website, the access offered under the grant and the eligibility criteria, if any. 15  Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)6673353 - 20/09/2024 5 Where the call conditions impose additional traceability obligations, information on the traceability of the users and the nature and quantity of access must be provided by the beneficiaries. These obligations apply regardless of the form of funding or budget categories used to declare the costs (unit costs or actual costs or a combination of the two). 5 According to the definition given in ISO 9000, i.e.: “Traceability is the ability to trace the history, application, use and location of an item or its characteristics through recorded identification data.” The users can be traced, for example, by authentication and/or by authorization or by other means that allows for analysis of the type of users and the nature and quantity of access provided. 16  Digitally sealed by the European Commission Date: 2024.09.20 15:26:22 CEST This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally sealed. This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity. Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt. Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation symbol. More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders Portal. (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq) Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111 Ref. Ares(2024)3661464 - 22/05/2024 EUROPEAN HEALTH AND DIGITAL EXECUTIVE AGENCY (HADEA) HADEA.B – Digital, Industry and Space B.3 – Industry Santiago CUESTA LÓPEZ CLUSTER PARA LA MINERIA SOSTENIBLE Y SERVICIOS ASOCIADOS DE LA PENINSULA IBERICA - IBERIAN SUSTAINABLE MINING CLUSTER C/JULIA MORROS S/N OFICINA 107 PARQUE TECNOLOGICO ARMUNIA 24009 LEON SPAIN Subject: Horizon Europe (HORIZON) Call: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Project: 101178897 — DEXPLORE GAP invitation letter Dear Applicant, I am writing in connection with your proposal for the above-mentioned call. Having completed the evaluation, we are pleased to inform you that your proposal has passed this phase and that we would now like to start grant preparation. Please find enclosed the evaluation summary report (ESR) for your proposal. Invitation to grant preparation Grant preparation will be based on the following: 1. Project: Project number and name: 101178897 — DEXPLORE Topic: HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-01 — Exploration of critical raw materials in deep land deposits (RIA) Type of action: HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions Requested grant amount (proposal): 4 669 428.75 EUR Maximum grant amount (after evaluation): 4 669 428.75 EUR Project duration: 36 months 2. Timetable and deadlines: Preparation of grant data and annexes: 4 weeks after receiving this letter 1 European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA), B-1049 Brussels, Belgium  Declaration of honour (DoH): 6 weeks after receiving this letter Signature: within 3 months after receiving this letter (planned date) The grant agreement data and annexes (description of the action, estimated budget, etc.) must be based on the proposal you submitted and the clarifications we requested (if any). You may normally NOT make changes to the project/project budget/consortium composition (except if required by us). Please immediately inform your project officer if you need to make a change (e.g. bankruptcy, etc.). Once we have checked the information you have encoded, you will have 2 weeks to submit your final version — to bring it in line with our comments. 3. Participant Register All partners participating as beneficiaries or affiliated entities must be registered and validated in the Participant Register. Please note that some of your legal and financial data in this Register is read-only and can be updated only by a LEAR (via the Portal My Organisation(s) page). If you do not already have one, we will contact you soon for their nomination. 4. How to contact us Project officer: Floriana LA MARCA Grant preparation and grant signature will be done exclusively through the Funding & Tenders Portal (login via your Portal account). The Portal allows you to upload documents, send Messages and Formal Notifications. Avoid contacting us via other means (email, letter, etc.); this will allow us to keep the full project file all in the same place. Please note that affiliated entities cannot directly access the Portal Grant Management System; grant preparation will therefore have to be done by their beneficiaries for them. 5. Other For more information on grant preparation, see the Online Manual. Please note that this letter does NOT constitute a formal commitment for funding. The final decision on your project (including the grant amount to be awarded) can be taken only later, when we have finalised grant preparation and the checks that still need to be done (LEAR appointment, legal entity validation, financial capacity assessment, non-exclusion check, ethics review, security review, etc.). We will try to proceed as swiftly as possible, but we rely on your good cooperation. If you do not reply to our requests or repeatedly miss grant preparation deadlines, we will consider that you are no longer interested in our grant (and reject your proposal). As described in the General Annexes, successful applicants established in a country in the process of associating to Horizon Europe will not be treated as established in an associated country if the association agreement does not apply by the time of the signature of the grant agreement. We would like to reiterate that having a gender equality plan is an eligibility criterion for Public bodies, Higher education establishments and Research organisations from Member States and Associated Countries. Therefore, if this was not confirmed at proposal submission stage, we remind you that it must be done during the Grant Agreement preparation phase. Failing to do so will prevent you from signing the Grant Agreement. 2 European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA), B-1049 Brussels, Belgium In addition, REA (the Research Executive Agency) and the financial officer assigned to your proposal would also communicate directly to you or the other participants regarding validation, administrative and legal issues. May we remind you that the Grant Agreement Preparation process is running in parallel to the process of Legal Entities validation. Concerning the appointment of the extended mandate LEAR (emLEAR), whilst there is only one emLEAR, for reasons of business continuity, we strongly recommend appointing also one or more Account administrators (AcAd) who can act as LEAR backups for the entity. In the coming days your Project Officer will communicate to you by email/ posting on the Participant Portal further comments, targeted at clarifying the Evaluation Summary Report and other issues to facilitate the transfer of your proposal into a Horizon Europe Grant Agreement. To ease the Grant Agreement Preparation process, the history of changes in Part B should be updated each time the Annexes are amended. For projects funded under this call, a Consortium Agreement is mandatory. It must be signed by all beneficiaries before your signature of the grant agreement. Templates are available (e.g. DESCA or MCARd or others). The Commission is not party to the Consortium Agreement. Based on the legal requirement and our own experience, we underline the essential role of a Consortium Agreement, at least to establish decision making bodies and voting rules, proxy arrangements, Intellectual Property Rights for fore- and background, etc. More information on the evaluation of the call is published in a topic update in the Funding & Tenders Portal. I would be grateful if you could inform everyone involved in your proposal of this letter. For any questions, please contact us via your Funding & Tenders Portal account > My Project(s) > Actions > Manage Project > Process communications. Yours faithfully, Victoria PETROVA Head of Unit Enclosure: Evaluation summary report (ESR) 3 European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA), B-1049 Brussels, Belgium Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)3730889 - 24/05/2024 Ethics Summary Report Call Reference HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01 Proposal Number 101178897 Acronym DEXPLORE Ethics Issues Humans Yes Personal data Yes Environment, health and safety Yes Artificial intelligence Yes Ethics Opinion Ethics clearance (the proposal is 'ethics ready') General requirement applicable to all grants The beneficiaries must ensure that all ethics issues related to activities in the grant are addressed in compliance with ethical principles, the applicable international and national law, and the provisions set out in the Grant Agreement. This includes the ethics issues identified in this report and any additional ethics issues that may emerge in the course of the grant. In case any substantial new ethics issues arise, beneficiaries should inform the granting authority. For each ethics issue applicable, beneficiaries must follow the guidance provided in the How to complete your ethics self-assessment. 101178897/DEXPLORE - 24/05/2024-09:50:21 1 /1  Digitally sealed by the European Commission Date: 2024.05.24 09:56:00 CEST This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally sealed. This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity. Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt. Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation symbol. More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders Portal. (https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq) Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111