Framework agreement

Annex 1 ……….01.2025 to Framework agreement No 2-2/25/………. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION 1. General requirements 1.1. The objective of the public procurement “Air traffic control service”, reference number 281646, is to ensure the service of flight checking for the Estonian Defence Forces at Ämari airfield. 1.2. For the proper operation of airfield (EEEI), periodic (or also extraordinary) flight checks need to be performed on the navigation and landing aids to prove their conformity with the established standards in order to provide a top-quality air navigation service. 1.3. Tenderers must be ready to provide all requested flight-checking services. NB! The list of services mentioned in the procurement documents and its annexes may change (e.g., be additions) if the contracting authority deems it necessary. 1.4. Tenderers undertake to provide the service at Estonia. 2. Requirements for the service – minimum requirements 2.1. The systems that require flight checks are: 2.1.1. TACAN (tactical air navigation system); 2.1.2. NBD (radio beacon) – two systems; 2.1.3. HRDF (High Resolution Direction Finder) – the VHF and UHF range; 2.1.4. ALS (approach lighting system) – two runway directions; 2.1.5. ILS (instrument landing system) – two runway directions; 2.1.6. One runway direction of ILS has three systems: 2.1.6.1. the localiser; 2.1.6.2. the glide-path beacon; 2.1.6.3. the distance measuring equipment. 2.1.7. PAR (precision approach radar) – two runway directions; 2.1.8. SSR (secondary surveillance radar); 2.1.9. PSR (primary surveillance radar of the airfield); 2.1.10. PAPI (precision approach path indicator) – two runway directions; 2.1.11. DVOR (Doppler VHF omnidirectional range radio beacon). 2.2. Flight checks are performed with an aircraft that is equipped with the respective control mechanisms. 2.3. The contracting authority is entitled to order the service for one, several or all systems that require flight checking. 2.4. The contracting authority is also entitled to order unscheduled extraordinary flight checks for one or several devices. 2.5. The flight check procedures must meet the requirements of ICAO Doc 8071 and STANAG 3374 (AEtP-1(E)). 2.6. The tenderer must provide all necessary means and staff for the performance of flight checks. 2.7. The tenderer must forward a report on the completed works to the procurement contract contact person’s e-mail within five business days after the completion of flight checks. No separate fees are paid for the drafting of such reports and the expenses thereof must be calculated as part of the expenses of providing the service. 1/2 2.8. The volume and time of flight check services will be specified before the performance of each particular flight check. 2.9. The tenderer must be capable of performing flight checks in accordance with the schedule set by the contracting authority. 2.10. In case the contracting authority orders the service of flight checking for all devices requiring flight checks, the checks of all devices must not exceed five (5) days. 2/2 Company Capability V1.9_291024  Company Capability Table of Content 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................... 3 2 ACCREDITATION AND COMPLIANCE ................................................................................................. 4 3 FLIGHT INSPECTION PLATFORM........................................................................................................ 4 3.1 AIRCRAFT ......................................................................................................................................................................................4 3.2 COCKPIT ........................................................................................................................................................................................7 3.3 FLIGHT INSPECTION INDUSTRY LESSONS LEARNED .....................................................................................................................7 3.4 COMPLIANCE WITH ICAO 8071 FLIGHT INSPECTION AIRCRAFT REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................8 4 MAINTENANCE CAPABILITIES ........................................................................................................... 9 5 FLIGHT INSPECTION SYSTEM .......................................................................................................... 10 5.1 AUTOMATIC CERTIFICATION, REPORTS AND NOTIFICATIONS.................................................................................................. 11 6 TYPES OF FLIGHT INSPECTION ........................................................................................................ 12 6.1 FLIGHT INSPECTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 6.2 FLIGHT VALIDATION OF PROCEDURES ...................................................................................................................................... 13 7 OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING ................................................................................ 14 8 FPL SUPPORT .................................................................................................................................. 14 9 GROUND / AIR / GROUND COMMUNICATIONS .............................................................................. 14 10 KEY BENEFITS ................................................................................................................................. 14 11 FLIGHT PRECISION LTD INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE..................................................................... 15 FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 2 OF 18  Company Capability 1. Executive Summary Flight Precision Ltd. (FPL) is incorporated in the United Kingdom and is 100% privately owned, flight inspection company. FPL is also registered with ICAO as a flight inspection service provider. FPL can rely on three aircraft to deliver flight inspection services; two Beech King Air 350s (2-FPLF and YU-BTC) as primary aircraft and to an additional EASA-certified flight inspection aircraft a Cessna Citation (PH-LAB) to further bolster FPL’s capability. FPL has considerable international experience of delivering high-quality flight inspections in Europe, the Middle East, South East Asia and Africa to both military and civilian Customers. Furthermore, with 1050 shaft horsepower per side the King Air offers guaranteed climb performance in case of a propeller bird strike or engine failure even with full fuel onboard, crew and FIS equipment payload. King Air speeds and aircraft configuration are consistent with a wide range of normal IFR traffic and therefore it makes it an acceptable tool for procedures flyability assessment such as pilot workload assessment, climb/descend performance, bank angle limits and others (refer to ICAO 9906 & UK CAA CAP 785). As a consequence, an increasing number of Aviation Authorities and Airports are stipulating the use of aircraft of a similar size and complexity to the King Airs. All FPL’s aircraft are equipped with fully integrated dedicated Flight Inspection Systems with EASA STC. The Flight Inspection Systems are manufactured by Aerodata AG, the world ́s leading Flight Inspection System (AFIS) manufacturer based in Braunschweig, Germany. FPL flight inspectors, pilots and engineers have a multi-year experience in international flight inspection aircraft operations and will bring this international experience to bear in tailoring flight inspection solutions to individual requirements. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 3 OF 18  Company Capability 2. Accreditation and Compliance Flight Precision Ltd fully complies with and is accredited by the following: • UK CAA CAP 670 requirements. • Approved by the UK CAA for Flight Inspection Service • International Committee for Airspace Standards and Calibration (ICASC) Approved Flight Inspection Service Provider • EASA Part SPO • ICAO Annex 10 & ICAO Document 8071 • 2-Reg approved QMS and ISO 9001 • Registered with ICAO as a flight inspection service provider 3. Flight Inspection Platform 3.1 Aircraft Flight Precision Ltd uses the Beech King Air flight inspection aircraft; the preferred platform for all major flight inspection service providers. In thousands of hours of Special Missions flying, the aircraft has earned a reputation for reliability, operating in the harshest of conditions including extremes of weather. The King Air 350 stands out from its counterparts due to its sheer size. With a 58 ft wingspan, the King Air 350 handles turbulence better than other aircraft in its class. This makes it ideal for flight inspection at busy international airports such as Zayed International Airport where it can fit into surrounding air traffic, with minimal impact on the commercial traffic. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 4 OF 18  Company Capability Key features of the King Air include: 1. Sheer size and weight in comparison with smaller flight inspection aircraft. This makes the aircraft more resilient to turbulence; this is a major safety consideration for flight inspection aircraft on approaches to busy airports, with the ability to fly terminal and approach speeds the same as commercial jet traffic. 2. The King Air’s PT6A turboprop engines generate over a 1000 hp each; more than 5 times the thrust generated by smaller flight inspection aircraft; again, this helps improve resilience to turbulence and offers far superior climb performance in case of an engine failure. This is safety critical for low- level flying e.g. down to ILS point E in a hot weather environment. 3. FPL operates later model of King Air aircraft with factory installed Voice and Data recorders; this safety feature is now being specified by an increasing number of CAAs around the world. 4. With cruising speeds in excess of 300 knots, aircraft can transit from Europe to the Middle East in a few hours allowing FPL to respond quickly with aircraft and Crew to any flight check emergencies. 5. Wide range of downwind and approach speeds 140-210kts makes the King Air 350 both fast and manoeuvrable capable of flying flight inspection profiles and keeping up with the commercial jets air traffic flow. 6. Enabling precision evaluations, FPL’s flight inspection aircraft are outfitted with high-tech capabilities and equipment, such as autopilot coupling and calibrated 3D antennas necessary for measuring field strength within stringent International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) tolerance limits. Features include: a. A Rockwell Collins Pro Line 21 Integrated Avionics System, FMS-3000 Flight Management System and ADS-B solution as well as Honeywell’s EGPWS Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System. b. Autopilot coupling with the flight inspection system. This minimises pilot errors, reduces pilot workload and allows repeatability. In conclusion, the King Air Series aircraft with the PT6A engines has established a well-deserved reputation for reliability over thousands of hours special missions flying in extremes of temperature and weather. The King Air has the reputation of being able to operate in the hottest climates encountered in the Middle East or the coldest climates encountered in Northern Europe. The above reasons, together with increased payloads (allowing for up to 6 passengers) are the reasons why this aircraft is the platform of choice for over 90% of the world’s flight inspection organisations including Germany, France, USA, Australia and others top Tier providers. Furthermore, many Civil Aviation Authorities across the world e.g. Norway incl. Military, Netherlands, Spain, Bangladesh, and Luxembourg are now only accepting ICAO 8071 compliant platforms such as King Air for their flight inspection service requirements. Flight Precision Ltd can rely on three flight inspection aircraft (two Beech King Air 350s (2-FPLF and YU-BTC) and one Cessna Citation (PH-LAB) to deliver flight inspection services worldwide. Details of the three aircraft are given in the following pages: FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 5 OF 18 Company Capability FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 6 OF 18  Company Capability 3.2 Cockpit The Rockwell Collins Proline 21 cockpit is equipped with FMS and a fully capable autopilot system which has the ability to auto-couple to the Flight Inspection System cockpit In-flight guidance is given to the pilots directly through a repeater screen that mimics the flight inspectors own screen. This gives the pilots the ability to position onto calibration runs in the minimum amount of time (seen here to the right of the central display). 3.3 Flight Inspection Industry Lessons Learned In 2019, the FCSL DA-62 (G-MDME) crashed whilst on a flight check mission at Dubai International Airport. In the subsequent report, the GCAA AAIB criticised the Company’s Safety Management System and Crew Training and highlighted the fact that smaller aircraft such as the DA-62, with a max take off weight of 2300 kgs, are more susceptible to turbulence. Soon after the crash, the GCAA issued the following Prompt Safety Report (PSR01/2019): PSR01/2019 The General Civil Aviation Authority issue a safety alert to all air navigation service providers in the United Arab Emirates and to all operators of light aircraft, to enhance awareness among pilots and air traffic controllers of their separation procedures, particularly under visual flight rules. Light aircraft are generally defined as aircraft with a MTOW of up to 5,670 kg. The FPL King Air 350s have a MTOW of approximately 6,800 kg. Needless to say, the FPL pilots are also fully trained to ensure minimum separation at all times. In the final Air Accident Investigation report AAIS Case No AIFN/0007/2019, one of the recommendations from the AAIB was that the aircraft be fitted with airborne image and audio recording systems. FPL aircraft are classed as complex aircraft which means the safety requirements are similar to those found with larger passenger jets and flight data recorder and voice recorder are factory fitted. Light aircraft such as DA-62 have significant payload and space restrictions and fall in a different commercial category and therefore are not equipped to the standards that ICAO 8071 and GCAA AAIB stipulate. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 7 OF 18  Company Capability 3.4 Compliance with ICAO 8071 Flight Inspection Aircraft Requirements The table below summarises how the King Air is fully compliant in accordance with the ICAO 8071 and STANAG 3374 (AEtP-1(E)) requirements. ICAO 8071 Recommendation Smaller King Air Notes (Attachment A to Chapter 1) Aircraft Multi-engine turbine ✓ X Including engine thrust reverse to supplement braking, in hot or cold conditions and short runways. Pressurised ✓ X Air conditioned ✓ Limited Air conditioning in smaller aircraft are limited; they do not cope well with high outside ambient temperatures (in excess of 40˚C). Critical parameter for FIS receivers performance. Avionic Matches Airspace ✓ X Smaller aircraft and previous Requirements generation aircraft are not fitted with Cockpit Voice Recorder or Flight Data Recorder Certified for IFR operations ✓ ✓ Sufficient carrying capacity ✓ Limited Carrying capacity is a well known limitation for smaller aircrafts Sufficient Range and Endurance ✓ Limited King Air 350 has a far more superior range and endurance capabilities than smaller and lighter aircraft Aerodynamically stable ✓ Limited King Air 350 MTOW of 6,800kg Low noise and vibration ✓ ✓ Low electrical noise e.g. propeller ✓ X 4 blades on King Air 350 vs 3 blades modulation (four blade propeller) on lighter aircraft Stable electrical system ✓ ✓ Wide speed and altitude range ✓ X King Air 350 is a High-Performance Complex Aeroplane Suitable for future modifications ✓ Limited Significant payload and space restrictions Autopilot equipped ✓ Limited None of the budget and smaller aircraft offer FIS coupled with an aircraft autopilot FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 8 OF 18  Company Capability 4. Maintenance Capabilities Flight Precision main based is in Bournemouth, UK airport where base maintenance is available. Serbia, Belgrade is the satellite base where line maintenance is available and where one flight inspection aircraft is permanently based. In case of line maintenance requirements and AOG situation, a team of in-house type rated engineers will be deployed to resolve the technical issue(s) onsite. AFIS nearest maintenance facilities: Aerodata AG, Brunswick, Germany. In the unlikely event that the aircraft will need to make a base maintenance station visit during the mission, the aircraft will be flown to an EASA Part 145 base maintenance facility. For the King Air family of aircraft, there are a number available around the world. In case of a problem with the flight inspection system, Flight Precision FIS engineer will attempt to resolve the issue onsite/remotely and if required the design Authority Aerodata AG will provide the necessary technical support. There are over 100 Aerodata Flight Inspection Systems operated globally, and AerodataAG has a full stock of spares available in their German headquarters, ready to ship globally. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 9 OF 18  Company Capability 5. Flight Inspection System Flight Precision Ltd uses the third-party Aerodata’s Automatic Flight Inspection System (AFIS). This is a state-of-the-art, fully automatic flight inspection system for the calibration of landing aids at airports and ground-based radio navigation systems. The system uses dual frequency differential GPS to determine the aircraft’s position in space relative to a known point in 4 dimensions. The aircraft position is provided with dynamic position accuracy better than few centimeters. The internal time base of the AFIS is automatically synchronised to precision real-time stamping. The AFIS fully complies with the applicable issues of the ICAO requirements ICAO Annex 10 and Annex 14 and ICAO Document 8071. Operating a third party flight inspection system guarantees the integrity of the flight inspection data and ensures that there is no opportunity for the raw flight inspection data to be adjusted / modified by the flight inspection organisation e.g. manually override receivers ambient temperature limitation or smooth out raw data to fit a required profile. There is a growing concern within ANSPs of this risk, to the extent that at least one ANSP has specified in a recent tender that the flight inspection organisation cannot be the manufacturer of the flight inspection system. Key features of the FPL AFIS include: 1. Modified air transport category Honeywell RNZ-850 receivers 2. highest accuracy and integrity leading to reliable flight inspection results 3. full mission preparation and post flight analysis on ground 4. simultaneous multiple facility calibration, thus minimising flight times 5. autopliot coupling and AFIS flight guidance; this minimises pilot errors, reduces pilot workload and ensures accurate repeatability (where required) 6. automatic flight inspection report generation in flight eliminating human errors and manual data manipulation 7. proven reliability and availability demonstrated by over 100 systems operating worldwide. The AFIS installation within the FPL aircraft are fully certified by EASA Supplemental Type Certificates (STCs). This ensures that the AFIS, its antennae and its installation have been reviewed and approved by EASA for compatibility with the aircraft avionics and impact on aircraft performance. This is not necessarily the case with all Flight Inspection organisations; some still install the flight inspection system as ‘carry on’ equipment, without the disciplines of an EASA STC process and with all the risks that entails. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 10 OF 18  Company Capability 5.1 Automatic Certification, Reports and Notifications The AFIS provides real time measurements that can be immediately evaluated and fed back to the ground crew for any necessary adjustments. The automatic reporting/certification system delivers: ● Reduced risk of operator error; ● Increased standardisation; ● Earlier report delivery; ● Increased accuracy; ● Reduced workload for flight inspector; ● Guaranteed data preservation; ● Eliminate the risk of manual data manipulation, leading to false reports. Flight Precision Ltd provides a preliminary inspection report to the on-site technicians/engineers with and will demonstrate the recorded data via a graphical display on the dedicated flight inspection computer. Final certificates, reports and graphs will then be manually checked at the base and delivered to Client in line with the Scope of Work requirements. FPL reports meet ICAO 8071 and UK CAA requirements, if required reports layout and content can be tailored to meet Customer specific requirements. Flight Inspection data is saved in an individual project folder located on the company cloud drive and the Customer will be given an access to the project folder where all the data is stored. The data saved on the cloud drive is encrypted using SSL and is continuously backed up. Periodic Flight Inspection Reports and data required to generate Flight Inspection Reports is retained for at least 5 years. Commissioning Flight Inspection Reports and data required to generate Flight Inspection Reports is retained for the lifetime of the facility. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 11 OF 18  Company Capability 6. Types of Flight Inspection 6.1 Flight Inspection Flight Precision Limited provides the full spectrum of flight inspection services including: Nav Aids: • Instrument Landing System (ILS) Category I, II and III • VHF Omni directional Radio Range (VOR) • Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) • Non-Directional Beacon (NDB) • ILS Markers and FAN Markers • GBAS Landing System (GLS) • Transponder Landing Systems (TLS) Airfield Ground Lighting and Visual Glideslope Indicator: • Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) • Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) • Airfield Lighting Systems (ALS) Procedures Validation: • GPS Precision and Non Precision Approaches • Area Navigation Procedures RNAV • Instrument Approach Procedures RNP, including LNAV/VNAV, LP and LPV based on GNSS with SBAS/WAAS, GBAS or DME/DME • Instrument Flight Procedures validation (SID, STAR, SIAP) • GNSS with SBAS/WAAS evaluation • Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS/LAAS) VHF / UHF: • VHF Communications • VHF Direction finding (VDF) • UHF Communication • UHF Direction Finding (UDF) Radar: • Surveillance Radar Element (SRE) • Precision Approach Radar (PAR) • Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) • Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR/ MSSR) with dedicated Flight Inspection Transponder Mode A, C and S • Multilateration Systems (MLAT) / Wide Area Multilateration (WAM) • Precision Runway Monitor System (PRM) • Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) Military: • Military facilities Tactical Air Navigation (TACAN) • Scan DME/TACAN with up to 10 facilities • Oscilloscope/Digital Spectrum Analyzer for DME/TACAN FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 12 OF 18  Company Capability 6.2 Flight Validation of Procedures Flight Precision Ltd specialises in the provision of Flight evaluation and validation services of all types of instrument flight procedures RNAV and RNP including LNAV/VNAV, LP and LPV based on GNSS with SBAS/WAAS, GBAS or DME/DME. The flight validation service is delivered in accordance with ICAO Document 9906 Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design, Vol 5 – Validation of Instrument Flight Procedures. FPL provides all the elements required for successful validation of new or revised procedures: • Fully qualified and authorised Flight validation pilots. • Modern and complex aircraft Beechcraft B350i with dual set of flight management systems (FMS). • Onboard Aerodata AD-AFIS Automatic Flight Inspection System for recording all the parameters required for final evaluation. • 3D desktop simulation using designed and post-flight recorded flight profiles. • Obstacle assessment and pilot workload evaluation. • Pre-production database development and testing. • Full-flight simulator. • Final report includes all essential details, recorded parameters and operational assessment to declare that IFP is usable. • Start to end project oversight management for early error detection, schedule, and cost control. • Validate airspace with all types of procedures from takeoff to landing. Flight Precision Ltd works with several independent Flight Procedure Design companies to provide customers with comprehensive services that cover not only the Flight Validation, but the entire cycle including Flight Procedure Design, Simulation, Independent review, Pre-production database development, and Flight Validation. Key features and advantages include: • Design of flight procedures according to ICAO PANS-OPS (Doc 8168), ICAO Doc 4444 (PANS-ATM), ICAO Doc 9613 and ICAO Doc 9905. • Certified Flight Procedure Design experts. • Fast Time Simulation for different flight scenario trials. • Obstacle assessment as per regulatory requirements (ICAO Doc 9906 Vol. 5, Appendix A and Annex 14, Ch. 4). • Independent review of the design procedure and quality check. • Comprehensive design process to minimize the amount of flight validation hours. • Human factor errors' assessment and reduction (ICAO Doc 9906 Vol. 5, Appendix B). • ARINC-424 and FMS coded database validation. • Assessment of the airport ATM workload with potential improvement towards overall airport performance. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 13 OF 18  Company Capability 7. Operations Management and Planning FPL shall appoint a dedicated Operations Manager who will be the single point of contact for ADAC. The Operations Manager will be backed up by FPL Senior Management to cover absences. The Operation Manager is responsible for: • Planning the flight inspection schedule as per Customer requirements • Distributing flight inspection schedule with all the relevant authorities • Responding to on-demand and emergency flight inspections • KPI monitoring • Issuance of preliminary and final reports • Occasional and as required on-site attendance to oversee the flight inspection missions and direct liaison with the Customer. • And other relevant duties as listed in the service agreement 8. FPL Support Flight Precision also provides continuous technical support to its customers, with the flight inspection engineer being always available to consult on and troubleshoot issues that the Customer may encounter with its NavAids, and the next flight inspection programme is tailored to address any specific areas of concern. 9. Ground / Air / Ground Communications Flight Precision Ltd uses VHF/UHF frequency assignments to facilitate data communication between the ground based and airborne flight inspection equipment: • 118.0000-136.9750 Mhz with 25 kHz spaced channels. • VHF COM Transceiver 8.33kHz / 25 kHz channel spacing. To aid communications with the ground engineer, during flight inspections, Flight Precision Ltd carries VHF transceiver with antennas to be used by the Customers ground team for air-ground communication during the flight inspection. 10. Key Benefits The combination of an aircraft renowned worldwide for its special missions capability with a state of the art automatic flight inspection system, provides Customers with the following: 1. An aircraft able to reliably operate in extremes of temperature that can be expected in operations worldwide. 2. An aircraft more resilient to turbulence, able to operate safely in air traffic, thus reducing impact on airport operations. By flying at low traffic density and harmonising the flight inspection flights with the regular air traffic there is no longer a requirement to severely curtail normal traffic or, in the worst case, require runway or airport closures. 3. An aircraft with a cruising speed in excess of 300 knots; allowing it to respond faster to Customer emergencies than smaller aircraft with cruise speeds in the 150 knot range. 4. An aircraft with a range of 1200 nautical miles, allowing it to travel long distances in one hop; smaller aircraft would take a minimum of 3 hops for a similar range. 5. An aircraft with a payload capability of 15,000 lbs, allowing the aircraft to carry a full suite of FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 14 OF 18 Company Capability avionics, 2 pilots, a flight inspector, a project manager and up to 4 Customer Representatives. 6. The flight inspection system is coupled to the autopilot of the aircraft. Only this feature ensures that all procedures are flown with the highest accuracy and repeatability at all times. This in turn guarantees that all results of one facility are exactly comparable. 7. The flight inspection systems consist of dedicated and specially manufactured flight inspection receivers with higher accuracies than available from off-the-shelf commercially available receivers. 8. The flight inspection receivers and the complete systems including the antenna cabling are calibrated in regular intervals by certified personnel. This ensures the highest possible accuracy at all times. FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 15 OF 18 Company Capability 11. Flight Precision Ltd International Experience Netherland/Thales – Major Military contract Luxembourg – CAT III periodic x 5 TCN and x 13 ILS checks and special checks incl. Out of Phase checks Moldova – Continuous Support even during the nearby military Spain – Madrid CAT III one of activities the world’s busiest airport Oman – Muscat southern runaway x2 ILS/DME refurbishment, Emergency maintenance Support Lebanon/ICAO – Support even during the nearby military operation and GPS jamming Saudi – x 38 Airports over 500 flight hours per year SA – x 40 Airports 600 flight Seychelles – remote location hours over 1.5 years of (950nm to the mainland), steep Emergency Support approach with 1000m runway Flight Precision Projects FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 16 OF 18  Company Capability EASA / EUROCONTROL: 1. Netherlands (Civil & MILl) incl. Amsterdam (Schiphol) ILS CAT III. 2. Spain (Civil) incl. Madrid ILS CAT III 3. Luxembourg ILS CAT III 4. Lithuania (Civil & MIL) 5. United Kingdom (Civil & MIL) commissioning flight checks 6. Cyprus commissioning flight checks 7. Moldova periodic and commissioning flight checks 8. Romania Flight Precision operational experience includes both civil and military sectors in Europe, Africa, CIS, the Middle East and the Far East. Below is the summary table of recent and current international contracts. Country of Period of Client Types of Activities Undertaken Assignment activity x 5 TACAN Commissioning and x 13 ILS Netherlands Thales Italia Spa 2023 - 2025 Commissioning Azerbaijan AZAL 2024 CAT II ILS/VOR/DME/PAPI National Aerospace Laboratory Gilze Rijen, Woensdrecht, Maastricht Netherlands (NLR) / Netherlands Ministry of 2023 - ongoing Aachen, Rotterdam, Schiphol: Defence / LVNL TACAN/VOR/DME/ILS CAT III/PAP/AGL Georgia Saraeronavigation 2024 - ongoing CAT II ILS/VOR/DME/PAPI, validation Armenia ARMATS 2020-ongoing CAT II ILS/VOR/DME/PAPI Spain ENAIRE/Aerodata AG 2023 - ongoing CAT III/ DVOR/DME/ALS/ NDB/ PAPI Le Government Du Grand-Duché Luxembourg 2023 - ongoing CAT III ILS/VOR/DME/PAPI De Luxembourg Seychelles Seychelles Civil Aviation 2021 - 2024 VOR/DME/ILS CAT II, PAPI, AGL Lithuania Lithuanian Air Force 2023-2025 TACAN/VOR/DME/ILS CAT II, PAPI, AGL Muscat, Oman Galfar engineering 2023-2024 x2 ILS/DME refurbishment States of Guernsey Guernsey 2023 NDB commissioning ILS and DVOR\DME commissioning in Libya AviNeering AS 2024 Benghazi DME/NDB commissioning and periodic, ADS-B Tadjikistan SUE "Tajikaeronavigatsiya" 2023 - ongoing South Africa & Zambia, South Africa Civil Authority / VOR/DME/ILS CAT III & CAT II, PAPI, AGL, 2020-2021 Botswana & Tamfield NDB (38 airports) Namibia Ethiopia Ethiopian CAA 2022 VOR/DME/ILS CAT III & CAT II, PAPI, AGL VOR/DME/ILS CAT II, PAPI, procedure Bangladesh CAAB 2023 - 2025 validation, commissioning and periodic Tanzania TCAA 2022 VOR/DME/ILS CAT II, PAPI periodic FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 17 OF 18  Company Capability Country of Period of Client Types of Activities Undertaken Assignment activity Cyprus Cyprus DCA 2022 ILS/DME, commissioning, VOR, PAPI Moldova Moldatsa 2019 - 2023 VOR/DME/ILS/PAPI, validation VOR/DME/ILS CAT III & CAT II, PAPI, AGL, Romania Romanian CAA 2019 NDB periodic VOR/DME/ILS CAT III & CAT II, PAPI, AGL, Saudi Arabia SANS / SAMANA 2018-2020 NDB commissioning and periodic Morocco Indra / Radiola 2017 Radars trials, VOR/DME commissioning Saudia Arabia Aviation Consulting Services 2015-2017 VOR/DME/ILS commissioning FLIGHT PRECISION LTD. PAGE 18 OF 18 Annex 4 …….01.2025 to Framework agreement No 2-2/25/……….. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS The location of the public procurement object is in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces and due to that, the contracting party is notified of the following conditions: 1. Purpose of giving notice of security conditions The purpose of giving the contracting party notice is to explain to the contracting party the relations, rights and obligations of the parties in adhering to security requirements in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces. 2. Definitions 2.1. Giving notice, the following definitions shall apply: 2.1.1. Person to be checked – employee of the contractor or subcontractor who is subject to a background check, having given his or her prior written consent when applying for the right to enter to the restricted military area of the Defence Forces. 2.1.2. Background check – inspection of the circumstances provided for in § 413 of the Estonian Defence Forces Organisation Act with the purpose of ensuring the security of the Defence Forces and to decide on allowing the person to be checked to enter the restricted military area of the Defence Forces. 2.1.3. Structural unit of the Defence Forces – in the meaning of § 12 and § 13 of the Estonian Defence Forces Organisation Act. 2.1.4. Restricted military area of the Defence Forces – in the meaning of § 50 of the Estonian Defence Forces Organisation Act. 2.1.5. Subject-matter of the public procurement – the area of work located in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces intended for performing the contract. 2.1.6. Security requirements – the general security requirements specified in this document, incl. the requirements related to conducting background checks and the requirements established to ensure the security of the Defence Forces arising from other legal acts. 2.1.7. Access application – document, that the contractor’s responsible person is obligated to submit in order to initiate a background check of the person to be checked and for that person to obtain a right to access the site. Access application can be submitted using the attached sample or by sending a free-form e-mail to the e-mail address: [email protected]. Completed background check consent forms shall be attached to the application. 2.1.8. Consent form – document form accompanying the access application that the person to be checked is required to complete. 2.1.9. Right of access – the right to be present at the site in connection to performing the contract. One of the prerequisites for obtaining the right of access is to pass a background check. 2.1.10. Person with the right of access – employee of the contractor or subcontractor who has passed the background check and who has the right to enter and stay at the site unaccompanied in connection with performing the contract. Person with the right of access shall be admitted to the object under the conditions established by the specific structural unit of the Defence Forces. 2.1.11. Person with a special right of access – person with the right of access who, only in exceptional cases and with the prior approval of the responsible person of the Defence Forces, has the right to enter and stay at the site with an escort of the contractor in connection with performing the contract.  2.1.12. Responsible person of the Defence Forces – person appointed by the Defence Forces who is responsible for compliance with the security requirements at a site in a specific restricted military area of the Defence Forces. 2.1.13. Responsible person of the Estonian Centre for Defence Investments – contractual contact person, through whom the performance of contractual obligations and the forwarding of the notices, requirements and other documents prescribed in the contract is organized. 2.1.14. Responsible person of the contractor – person appointed by the contractor responsible for compliance with security requirements. 2.1.15. Responsible person at the site – person appointed by the contractor responsible for compliance with security requirements at the site located in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces. Person referred to in clauses 2.1.14 and 2.1.15 may be the same person. 3. Rights and obligations of the contractor 3.1. Contractor has the right to: 3.1.1. receive from the responsible person of the Defence Forces information necessary for fulfilling security requirements; 3.1.2. receive information on obtaining a right of access from the responsible person of the Defence Forces, dependent on the results of the background check. 3.2. Contractor is obligated to: 3.2.1. ensure the provision of the service agreed upon in the contract only by a person with a right of access; 3.2.2. ensure the compliance of the person with a right of access, incl. a person with a special right of access, with the conditions established in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces and to ensure the compliance of the subcontractor as well; 3.2.3. not to make a plan whereby the service would be provided by a person: 3.2.3.1. to whom a right of access has not been granted; 3.2.3.2. who has not undergone a background check; or 3.2.3.3. who has a special right of access but the right of access has not been coordinated; 3.2.4. submit the following documents to the e-mail address [email protected], that are required to be presented in order to obtain a right of access and initiate the background check as soon as possible, ad not later than seven (7) working days before the commencement of the work agreed upon in the contract, of the physical person providing a service at the site 3.2.4.1. access application (see example), and 3.2.4.2. completed and handwritten (scanned) or digitally signed consent of the person to be checked; 3.2.5. forward the original documents of the consents indicated in the aforementioned clause to the postal address: Defence Forces, Magasini 31A, 10138, Tallinn; 3.2.6. indicate in the free-form access application: 3.2.6.1. the forename and surname, personal identification code of the natural person providing the service and the name of the contractor and / or subcontractor; 3.2.6.2. justification for obtaining the right of access, i.e. description of the service or work to be performed at the specific site; 3.2.6.3. reference to the contract concluded and the term of the contract; 3.2.6.4. information on the vehicle (make/model and registration number) with which the restricted military area of the Defence Forces would be accessed; 3.2.6.5. contact details of the contractor’s representative (e-mail address, phone number);  3.2.6.6. signed consent of the person to be checked; attach it to the applicatio 3.2.7. add the following to the application for gaining right of access and initiating a background check for an alien: copy of the picture page of the identity document, incl. a visa or other document confirming the legal basis for staying in Estonia; 3.2.8. confirmation and certification of granting, possessing and extending the legal basis for the employment of an alien in Estonia (Aliens Act § 19 and § 20); 3.2.9. submit a new access application together with the person’s consent, if, as a result of the background check of the person being checked, a right of access has not been obtained; 3.2.10. maintain an up-to-date list of persons with a right of access, and to update, at the end of each calendar year, the list of employees who will continue to provide the service during the new calendar year, to this end an up-to-date list shall be sent to the e-mail address [email protected]; 3.2.11. notify without delay of a person with a right of access no longer needing access to the site, by sending an e-mail to [email protected]; 3.2.12. notify without delay the responsible person of the Defence Forces of any security requirement violations or suspicions of violations at the site. 4. Rights and obligations of the Defence Forces 4.1. The Defence Forces have the right to: 4.1.1. conduct a background check on the person to be checked, this is generally done within seven (7) working days of receiving a proper access application and consent; 4.1.2. conduct a new background check if the conditions specified in clause 3.2.9 are met, following the deadlines set forth in clause 4.1.1; 4.1.3. in other justified cases, extend the deadline for a background check by up to seven (7) working days, giving notice of this to the responsible person of the Contractor in a form that can be reproduced in writing; 4.1.4. establish security requirements, notifying the responsible person of the Contractor of these without delay; 4.1.5. grant a right of access to the person being checked or restrict that person’s right of access or grant the right of access to that person with a special condition on the basis of circumstances revealed in the background check; 4.1.6. refuse to grant a right of access for security reasons, incl. to a person who has not been a subject of a background check or to a person who cannot be subjected to a background check, but also to refuse to coordinate the right of access of a person with a special right of access; 4.1.7. restrict access to military restricted areas for stateless persons or persons with foreign citizenship, adhering to right of access to state secrets, the need to know and other requirements provided for in the State Secrets and Classified Foreign Information Act; 4.1.8. prohibit the person checked from entering the site if no consent was submitted or if it was submitted incorrectly; 4.1.9. check the observance of security requirements established at the site with regard to a person with a right of access and / or to a person with a special right of access; 4.1.10. prohibit the person referred to in clauses 2.1.10 and 2.1.11 from staying in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces in the event of non-compliance with or violation of security requirements. 4.2. The Defence Forces undertakes to: 4.2.1. notify, in a form reproducible in writing, the responsible person of the Contractor in writing of a person checked being given a right of access, incl. the relevant restrictions at the site; 4.2.2. notify the responsible person of the Contractor of determining a violation of the security requirements by a person with a right of access or a special right of access, which excludes him or her from acquiring a further right of access to the site;  4.2.3. introduce the security requirements established at the site or amendments thereto to the person with a right of access, incl. person with a special right of access. 4.3. The contacts of the responsible person of the Defence Forces (clause 2.1.12), the responsible person of the Centre for Defence Investment (clause 2.1.13), the responsible person of the contractor (2.1.14), the responsible person at the site (clause 2.1.15) shall be determined upon concluding the contract. 5. Final provisions 5.1. A party shall notify the other party in writing of a change of responsible persons in a format which can be reproduced in writing. 5.2. During the processing of personal data, the requirements of the applicable legislation are adhered to. 5.3. The Defence Forces have the right to make extraordinary proposals to the Estonian Centre for Defence Investments to terminate the contract regardless of the period for giving notice, if the contractor violates the obligations specified in clauses 3.2.1. – 3.2.4, the confidentiality requirement provided in the contract is not observed or the contractor’s or subcontractor’s employees do not comply with the requirements established in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces.  ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Restrictions on access apply as of the date the form is completed and as long as required but no longer than 75 years. Legal grounds: Public Information Act clause 35 (1) 12) APPLICATION FOR GAINING ACCESS TO THE RESTRICTED MILITARY AREA OF THE DEFENCE FORCES ACCESS APPLICATION [Registration number] [………..……] date With this application, I confirm that [company name] has concluded a contract with [name of the institution] and has a need to gain access to the restricted military area of the Defence Forces in connection with Contract No. [Contract No.]. The Contract shall remain in force from [start date of the contract] to [end date of the contract]. [Name of the company] performs in the restricted military area of the Defence Forces [purpose of the contract, nature of the works] and applies for a right of access to the following sites: 1. Name of the site: [name of the site] Address: [address] Responsible person at the site: [forename and surname], [phone number], [e-mail address] Responsible person of the Defence Forces: [forename and surname] 2. etc. With regard to need to access the aforementioned sites of the Defence Forces, the contractor [company name] requests that a background check be initiated on the following person(s) as employees of the contractor [company name] [and name of the subcontractor], based on the consent of the persons (signed consent forms attached to the application) and vehicles noted in the access application. Employees of the main contractor [company name]: 1. [forename and surname, personal identification code] 2. etc. Employees of the subcontractor [company name]: 1. [forename and surname, personal identification code] 2. etc. Vehicles: 1. Registration numberMake / model 2. etc. The contractor is aware that, depending on the result of the background check, the Defence Forces has the right to restrict the access of persons to the restricted military area of the Defence Forces and that successfully passing the background check does not guarantee automatic access to the restricted military area of the Defence Forces. [Signature] [forename and surname] [Position]  ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Restrictions on access apply as of the date the form is completed and as long as required but no longer than 75 years. Legal grounds: Public Information Act clause 35 (1) 12) AUTHORISATION FOR CONDUCTING A PERSONAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION ON A NATURAL PERSON FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING CLEARANCE TO ACCESS RESTRICTED MILITARY AREAS OF THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SERVICES TO THE ESTONIAN DEFENCE FORCES (First Name and Last Name) Personal identification code: I hereby authorise the Estonian Defence Forces to process my personal data in the manner provided for in § 41⁵ of the Estonian Defence Forces Organisation Act (hereinafter: EDFOA) in order to obtain clearance to access restricted military areas for the duration of the validity of the service provision contract but no longer than five years as of receiving this authorisation. By giving this Authorisation I acknowledge the following: 1. I have the right to refuse to give my authorisation (clause 416 (2) 1) of EDFOA); 2. I have the right to refuse to provide any information that may result in offence proceedings being brought against me or people close to me or my domestic partner (clause 416 (2) 2) of EDFOA ); 3. I have the right to request the termination of any data collection or queries concerning me (clause § 416 (2) 3) of EDFOA ); 4. I have the right to provide explanations for the information collected about me (clause 416 (2) 4) of EDFOA); 5. if I should refuse to authorise a background investigation or request to terminate data collection or inquiries, it may constitute grounds for refusal to grant me clearance to access restricted military areas of the Estonian Defence Forces (subsection 41³ (4) of EDFOA); 6. I have the right to protect my rights by having recourse to the courts, the Chancellor of Justice or the Data Protection Inspectorate to challenge any decisions made on the basis of information collected in accordance with section 41⁶ of EDFOA in order to ascertain whether the Estonian Defence Forces have safeguarded my basic rights and liberties and followed good administrative practice (clause 416 (2) 5) of EDFOA); 7. the Estonian Defence Forces retain the right to restrict my rights with regard to the personal data being processed (subsections 41¹⁰ (3) and (4) of EDFOA). (day, month, year) [ signed digitally ]1 1 handwritten signature also allowed Annex 2. Cost form Annex 2 to Framework agreement ……….2025 No 2-2/25/……… Pakkuja nimi/ Name of the Tenderer: Flight Precision Ltd Pakkuja registrikood/ Registry code of Tenderer: 8977861 Pakkumuse koostamise kuupäev/ Date: 29.10.2024 Pakkumuse jõusoleku aeg kalendripäevades/ Validity of the tender in days: 120 Rida/ Row Nimetus/ Namer Maksumus km-ta/ Price without VAT Ühik/ Unit Lennukontrolli meeskonna väljasõit Ämari lennubaasi. Kulud peavad sisaldama kõiki kulusid, mis tekivad lennukontrollide meeskonnal ning mis on seotud õhusõiduki ja selle seadmetega. 19550,00 EUR A call-out of a flight-checking team to Ämari Air Base. The cost must include all expenses 1 that are incurred by the flight-checking team and in relation to the aircraft and its devices. TACAN – süsteemi lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 8200,00 EUR 2 TACAN – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time TACAN – süsteemi lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 (ühe) lisatunni maksumus 4100,00 EUR/h 3 TACAN – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- Internal NDB – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus 3075,00 EUR 4 Internal NDB – cost of a flight check of the device – 1 time Internal NDB – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus Internal NDB – cost of a flight check of the device – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing 4100,00 EUR/h 5 flight-checking External NDB – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 5125,00 EUR 6 External NDB – cost of a flight check of the device – 1 time External NDB – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus External NDB – cost of a flight check of the device – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing 4100,00 EUR/h 7 flight-checking HRDF VHF – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 3075,00 EUR 8 HRDF VHF – cost of a flight check of the device – 1 time HRDF VHF – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus HRDF VHF – cost of a flight check of the device – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing 4100,00 EUR/h 9 flight-checking HRDF UHF – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 3075,00 EUR 10 HRDF UHF – cost of a flight check of the device – 1 time HRDF UHF – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus HRDF UHF – cost of a flight check of the device – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing 4100,00 EUR/h 11 flight-checking ALS 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 1025,00 EUR 12 ALS 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time ALS 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus ALS 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 13 checking ALS 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 1025,00 EUR 14 ALS 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time ALS24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus ALS 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 15 checking ILS 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 10250,00 EUR 16 ILS 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time ILS 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus ILS 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 17 checking ILS 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 10250,00 EUR 18 ILS 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time ILS 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus ILS 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 19 checking PAR 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 2050,00 EUR 20 PAR 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time PAR06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus PAR 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 21 checking PAR 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 2050,00 EUR 22 PAR 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time PAR 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus PAR 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 23 checking PSR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 5125,00 EUR 24 PSR – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time PSR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus PSR – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 25 checking SSR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 6150,00 EUR 26 SSR – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time SSR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus SSR – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 27 checking PAPI 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 1025,00 EUR 28 PAPI 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time  PAPI 06 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus PAPI 06 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 29 checking PAPI 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 1025,00 EUR 30 PAPI 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time PAPI 24 – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus PAPI 24 – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 31 checking DVOR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 kord 8200,00 EUR 32 DVOR – cost of a flight check of the system – 1 time DVOR – seadme lennukontrolli maksumus – 1 lisatunni maksumus DVOR – cost of a flight check of the system – the cost of 1 extra hour for performing flight- 4100,00 EUR/h 33 checking Positsioonide koondkulud/Aggregated cost of positions 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32 90275,00 EUR (eRHRi sisestatav lahter/ cell to be entered into the procurement register)