5868670 428625 0 0 -3810 9839325 Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Rg-kood 74000323 Tel 620 2002 E-post
[email protected] www.taltech.ee 0 0 Ehitajate tee 5 19086 Tallinn Rg-kood 74000323 Tel 620 2002 E-post
[email protected] www.taltech.ee -3810 428625 0 0 SA Eesti Teadusagentuur Soola 8 02 .0 4 .2025 nr 11-10/ 351-6 5 1004 Tartu Ettevalmistustoetuse taotlemine Käesolevaga taotleb Tallinna Tehnikaülikool ( reg nr 74000323, ak EE201010052037382001 ) ettevalmistustoetust p rojekti de le : 1. Public Administration Doctoral Network in Digital and Green Transitions – PANDORIS ( 101227619 , HORIZON-MSCA-2024-DN-01-01 ) , vastutav täitja professor Veiko Lember , Ragnar Nurkse Innovatsiooni ja valitsemise instituut ; 2. European Doctoral Network for Holistic Maritime Safety and Cybersecurity of Automated Vessels – HOL-MSAC ( 101227681 , HORIZON-MSCA-2024-DN-01-01 ), vastutav täitja p rofessor Pentti Jouko Sakari Kujala , Eesti Mereakadeemia . Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Marika Lunden Teadusosakond Lisa: ESR id left 284480 Riina Vilgats 620 3536
[email protected] 0 0 Riina Vilgats 620 3536
[email protected]
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2155770 - 17/03/2025
Proposal Evaluation Form
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation Summary
Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON) Report - Doctoral
Networks
Call: HORIZON-MSCA-2024-DN-01
Type of action: HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-DN
Proposal number: 101227619
Proposal acronym: PANDORIS
Duration (months): 48
Proposal title: Public Administration Doctoral Network in Digital and Green Transitions
Activity: SOC
N. Proposer name Country Total % Grant %
eligible Requested
costs
1 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL EE 834,005.16 21.31% 834,005.16 21.31%
2 UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON UK 1,046,214.36 26.73% 1,046,214.36 26.73%
3 KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN BE 577,080 14.75% 577,080 14.75%
4 UNIVERSITEIT UTRECHT NL 610,571.52 15.60% 610,571.52 15.60%
5 UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA IT 563,510.16 14.40% 563,510.16 14.40%
6 UNIVERSIDAD DE VIGO ES 282,188.16 7.21% 282,188.16 7.21%
7 UNITED NATIONS ORGANISATION US 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
8 Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Center SA EE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
9 OPEN IMPACT SRL IT 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
10 SRL SCIENCE BUSINESS PUBLISHING INTERNATIONAL BE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
11 Welement AS EE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Total: 3,913,569.36 3,913,569.36
Abstract:
PANDORIS establishes an innovative doctoral training network dedicated to equipping Doctoral Candidates (DCs) with cutting-edge expertise in
transformative governance for the twin digital-green transitions. The program addresses a critical knowledge gap by training DCs to navigate and
manage the complexities inherent in digital and sustainable transformations, producing specialists skilled in political, societal, and economic facets of
twin transition governance. This interdisciplinary, intersectoral network provides robust research, mentorship, and mobility opportunities, ensuring
DCs gain versatile skills applicable across academia, public, and private sectors. The project fosters international cooperation among consortium
partners, enhancing research capacity and knowledge exchange to build a cohesive approach to public administration and sustainability. By generating
evidence-based insights and solutions, PANDORIS aims to influence policy, enrich existing doctoral programs, and extend best practices beyond
academia. With a specific focus on the integration of public and private sector innovations, this program advances a comprehensive framework for
transformative governance, paving the way for resilient, sustainable public administrations capable of leading Europe’s twin transition.
Evaluation Summary Report
Evaluation Result
Total score: 94.80 % (Threshold: 70 /100.00)
Criterion 1 - Excellence
Score: 4.60 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 50.00% )
101227619/PANDORIS-17/03/2025-12:46:20 1/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2155770 - 17/03/2025
• Quality and pertinence of the project’s research and innovation objectives (and the extent to which they are ambitious, and go beyond the state of
the art).
• Soundness of the proposed methodology (including interdisciplinary approaches, consideration of the gender dimension and other diversity
aspects if relevant for the research project, and the quality and appropriateness of open science practices).
• Quality and credibility of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, inter-sectoral and gender as well as other
diversity aspects).
• Quality of the supervision (including mandatory joint supervision for industrial and joint doctorate projects).
The proposal is highly relevant, focusing on the critical challenge posed by the twin transitions of digitalization and sustainability for the capacity of public
administrations across Europe. Its aim is timely and well aligned with European priorities and initiatives and the broader agenda of transformative science and
innovation policies. Research and training objectives are clearly explained, their achievability is well supported by credible KPIs and by the consortium excellent
expertise. Along with a comprehensive literature review, research and training gaps are appropriately identified. It is ambitious and promising. Although it brings
about breakthrough innovations, it does not clearly benchmark them against the current state of the art, identifying specific areas where it transcends existing
solutions, which is a minor shortcoming. Overall, the contribution of the individual research projects (IRP) is convincingly explained, with a well-balanced mix of
theoretical and empirical approaches, ensuring that the IRPs address critical sub-questions and contribute coherently to shared objectives. This approach will
facilitate cross-project learning and collaboration. However, mechanisms for integration to ensure that IRP's contribute to the overall programme are not fully
described.
The scientific methodology is clear, sound, and well suited enabling the network to deliver its objectives. Methodological challenges are effectively addressed, the
interdisciplinary approach is coherent and effectively addresses the complexities of the twin transitions as well as enhancing the robustness of research outcomes.
Nevertheless, the proposal does not fully clarify how a cohesive theoretical foundation will be established by connecting disciplines and integrating methods across
the IRPs, which is a minor shortcoming. The gender dimension and other diversity aspects are well addressed and properly integrated into the research and training
activities. Dedicated modules on gender equality, diversity management, and research ethics highlight the commitment to inclusive and responsible research
practices. Open science practices are thoroughly addressed and implemented as an integral part of the methodology. A strong commitment to FAIR principles in
research data management is presented.
The network-wide training events are meaningful and well-aligned with research objectives and tailored to individual needs. The training program is ambitious and
includes a significant focus on transferable skills and specialized skills, as well as interdisciplinary and inter-sectoral experience. Activities are well suited to support
the DCs development, enhancing their career prospects and capacity to address complex global challenges. However, their development is not presented fully
clearly, as some professional competencies are not appropriately differentiated, which is a minor shortcoming. The multidisciplinary and intersectoral training is
well integrated and thoughtfully designed to complement the programs offered locally at the participating organisations.
The qualifications, skills, and supervision experience of the academic supervisors are highly relevant. The supervisors are internationally recognized researchers
with strong track records in PhD supervision and expertise. Overall, their level of participation in international research projects, supervision, and training is
exceptional. The quality of supervision is strong, with a well balanced mix of experienced researchers with extensive supervisory backgrounds and less experienced
ones. The supervision arrangements are well structured and effectively support the DCs throughout their doctoral training.
Criterion 2 - Impact
Score: 4.80 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 30.00% )
• Contribution to structuring doctoral training at the European level and to strengthening European innovation capacity, including the potential
for:
a) meaningful contribution of the non-academic sector to the doctoral training, as appropriate to the implementation mode and research field
b) developing sustainable elements of doctoral programmes.
• Credibility of the measures to enhance the career perspectives and employability of researchers and contribution to their skills development.
• Suitability and quality of the measures to maximise expected outcomes and impacts, as set out in the dissemination and exploitation plan,
including communication activities.
• The magnitude and importance of the project’s contribution to the expected scientific, societal and economic impacts.
The contribution of the non-academic sector to doctoral training is robust and promising in providing valuable opportunities for DCs through collaborations with
leading international organisations and private sector partners. The consortium includes supervisors with hold advisory roles in public and private sector institutions
and which actively contribute to real-world policy and innovation initiatives. Additionally, the structured and measurable approach ensures impactful career
preparation aligned with MSCA benchmarks. The plans for developing sustainable elements of the program beyond the funding period are comprehensive and
overall convincing and contribute to the lasting impact of the proposal on doctoral training at the European level. Robust measures to enhance the career prospects
and employability of the DCs across sectors are credible and convincing. A key strength is the international and intersectoral exposure, along with participation in
global and EU networks, offering significant opportunities for career advancement.
The proposal carefully details the significant contribution of the research and training program to the development of a wide variety of competencies and skills,
which align with the needs of potential employers in some sectors, and position DCs to become leading change agents. However, the proposal does not convincingly
elaborate on how the activities would prepare the DCs for entrepreneurship and self-employment, which would limit DCs ability to thrive in emerging job roles.
The dissemination, exploitation, and communication measures are suitable and of high quality. They are convincingly described and include well chosen channels,
audiences and measurement indicators. They have clear objectives aimed at maximizing outcomes and impacts across different target groups, which are explicitly
identified, and strategies are tailored to effectively engage each audience. The strategy for the management of intellectual property is properly outlined and suitable
to support the exploitation of results. Potential complexities in intersectoral collaboration are addressed particularly well. The exploitation plan is clear, well
articulated, and convincing, as it effectively addresses academic and non-academic partners, public administrations, and broader policy networks. However, it does
not fully demonstrate ambition in establishing long-lasting collaborations with public institutions, such as ministries, municipalities, and regional development
agencies involved in the planning and implementation of policies related to transformative governance.
The expected scientific impact is credible and significant in advancing transformative governance research and enhancing our understanding of twin transitions
and making important contributions to raising public awareness. Its potential to influence policy design, public administration, and corporate responsibility from a
transformative perspective is significant. The expected economic and technological impacts are credible: highly skilled DCs contribute to the EU's competitiveness,
technological sovereignty, strategic autonomy. The expected societal impact is convincing, enhancing governance practices, promoting sustainable policies, and
fostering socially-just transitions. The proposal benefits society by supporting sustainability, inclusivity, and resilience.
Criterion 3 - implementation
Score: 5.00 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 20.00% )
101227619/PANDORIS-17/03/2025-12:46:20 2/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2155770 - 17/03/2025
• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, assessment of risks and appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages.
• Quality, capacity and role of each participant, including hosting arrangements and extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the
necessary expertise.
The work plan is highly detailed and effectively structured and aligns seamlessly with the overall objectives and methodology. Work packages, tasks, deliverables,
and milestones are coherent and properly defined to track progress. The IRPs and their secondment plans are appropriately integrated within the work plan. The
distribution of effort assigned to work packages is appropriate. Critical managerial, scientific, and technical risks are identified and well addressed, risk mitigation
measures proposed are appropriate, risks such as delays in recruitment, partner coordination challenges, and data access issues are well addressed with specific
strategies to mitigate them. However, the proposal does not clearly discuss scientific misconduct as a risk.
Beneficiaries and associated partners are fully equipped with the appropriate infrastructure and operational capacity to enable the proposal's aims, ensuring
adequate hosting and support for the activities of DCs. Robust facilities, resources, and support systems guarantee high-quality research and training. The
consortium brings together complementary expertise across public administration, digital transformation, innovation studies, and sustainability, which is effectively
exploited and fosters interdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge exchange, while the roles and contributions of beneficiaries and associated partners are very
well-defined and coherent. The consortium excels in areas such as sustainability transitions, digital innovation, public administration, and collaborative governance.
Associated partners fully contribute to research and training activities. They offer practical experience through secondments, mentorship, and specialized training,
enhancing the proposal's relevance and impact. Their commitment is clearly articulated, and their involvement strengthens the consortium's capacity.
Scope of the proposal
Status: Yes
Comments (in case the proposal is out of scope)
Not provided
Exceptional funding
A third country participant/international organisation not listed in the General Annex to the Main Work Programme may exceptionally receive funding if
their participation is essential for carrying out the project (for instance due to outstanding expertise, access to unique know-how, access to research
infrastructure, access to particular geographical environments, possibility to involve key partners in emerging markets, access to data, etc.). (For more
information, see the HE programme guide )
Please list the concerned applicants and requested grant amount and explain the reasons why.
Based on the information provided, the following participants should receive exceptional funding:
Not provided
Based on the information provided, the following participants should NOT receive exceptional funding:
Not provided
Use of human embryonic stem cells (hESC)
Status: No
If YES, please state whether the use of hESC is, or is not, in your opinion, necessary to achieve the scientific objectives of the proposal and the
reasons why. Alternatively, please state if it cannot be assessed whether the use of hESC is necessary or not because of a lack of information.
Not provided
Use of human embryos
Status: No
If YES, please state how the human embryos will be used in the project.
Not provided
Activities excluded from funding
Status: No
If YES, please explain.
Not provided
101227619/PANDORIS-17/03/2025-12:46:20 3/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2155770 - 17/03/2025
Do no significant harm principle
Status: Yes
If Partially/No/Cannot be assessed please explain
Not provided
Exclusive focus on civil applications
Status: Yes
If NO, please explain.
Not provided
Artificial Intelligence
Status: No
If YES, the technical robustness of the proposed system must be evaluated under the appropriate (excellence?) criterion.
Overall comments
Not provided
101227619/PANDORIS-17/03/2025-12:46:20 4/4
Digitally sealed by the European Commission
Date: 2025.03.17 13:36:36 CET
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
sealed.
This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity.
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
symbol.
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
Portal.
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2162850 - 17/03/2025
Proposal Evaluation Form
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Evaluation Summary
Horizon Europe Framework Programme (HORIZON) Report - Doctoral
Networks
Call: HORIZON-MSCA-2024-DN-01
Type of action: HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-DN
Proposal number: 101227681
Proposal acronym: HOL-MSAC
Duration (months): 48
Proposal title: European Doctoral Network for Holistic Maritime Safety and Cybersecurity of Automated Vessels
Activity: ENG
N. Proposer name Country Total % Grant %
eligible Requested
costs
1 TALLINNA TEHNIKAÜLIKOOL EE 1,112,006.88 25.20% 1,112,006.88 25.20%
2 TURUN YLIOPISTO FI 314,524.8 7.13% 314,524.8 7.13%
3 TURUN AMMATTIKORKEAKOULU OY FI 314,524.8 7.13% 314,524.8 7.13%
4 CHALMERS TEKNISKA HOGSKOLA AB SE 973,890 22.07% 973,890 22.07%
5 POLITECHNIKA GDANSKA PL 753,452.28 17.08% 753,452.28 17.08%
6 ABO AKADEMI FI 314,524.8 7.13% 314,524.8 7.13%
7 AALTO KORKEAKOULUSAATIO SR FI 629,049.6 14.26% 629,049.6 14.26%
8 PROEKSPERT AS EE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
9 Riigilaevastik EE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
10 MINDCHIP EE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
11 AKTIEBOLAGET VOLVO PENTA SE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
12 Clavister AB SE 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
13 NavSim Polska Sp. z o.o. PL 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
14 Brighthouse Intelligence Ltd FI 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
15 Metalliteollisuuden Standardisointiyhdistys ry FI 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
16 MEYER TURKU OY FI 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
Total: 4,411,973.16 4,411,973.16
Abstract:
101227681/HOL-MSAC-17/03/2025-13:25:21 1/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2162850 - 17/03/2025
The MSCA Doctoral Networks project HOL-MSAC, aims to address the critical challenges faced by the maritime sector in its digital transformation.
The project focuses on enhancing maritime safety and cybersecurity. The maritime industry, which is vital for global trade, is undergoing significant
changes due to digitalization, automation, and new environmental demands. These changes bring both opportunities and risks, including cybersecurity
threats and the need for new safety protocols.
HOL-MSAC proposes a holistic approach to maritime safety, integrating automation and cybersecurity to develop resilient systems in maritime. The
project will enroll 15 PhD students across several universities, combining expertise in marine traffic safety, ship navigation, computer science, and
cybersecurity. To enrich the research with Industry experience, the consortium includes nine industrial partners.
Key research areas of the PhD projects include developing new risk and safety management strategies, improving the resilience of autonomous
vessels, and enhancing cybersecurity situational awareness. The project will also focus on attack detection and prevention, adapting methodologies to
the unique characteristics of the maritime environment. Additionally, HOL-MSAC aims to develop smart containers using blockchain technology to
improve supply chain management.
The project emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, integrating insights from social sciences to address human factors in safety and cybersecurity.
It also promotes gender equality, open science practices, and responsible use of AI.
HOL-MSAC's expected impacts are significant, including advancements in new market products for risk assessment, and improved cybersecurity
measures for maritime operations. The project aims to enhance the career prospects for new generation of researchers, foster innovation, and
contribute to the economic and societal well-being by ensuring safer and more secure maritime transport.
Evaluation Summary Report
Evaluation Result
Total score: 86.60 % (Threshold: 70 /100.00)
Criterion 1 - Excellence
Score: 4.10 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 50.00% )
• Quality and pertinence of the project’s research and innovation objectives (and the extent to which they are ambitious, and go beyond the state of
the art).
• Soundness of the proposed methodology (including interdisciplinary approaches, consideration of the gender dimension and other diversity
aspects if relevant for the research project, and the quality and appropriateness of open science practices).
• Quality and credibility of the training programme (including transferable skills, inter/multidisciplinary, inter-sectoral and gender as well as other
diversity aspects).
• Quality of the supervision (including mandatory joint supervision for industrial and joint doctorate projects).
The overall topic and concept of the proposed project is relevant and timely. The objectives are clear and ambitious. However, the measurability and verifiability of
achieving the goals is insufficiently defined. This is shortcoming.
The level of description of objectives differs and for some of them it is unclear if and to what extent the work goes beyond the state of the art. This is shortcoming.
The proposal presents the bigger picture of the research and presents very convincingly how the individual research projects are integrated into the overall research
programme; it is also clear how the individual projects will support each other.
The methodology is presented with very limited details and with a different level of detail for each group of the research topics. The AI based systems to be
developed in the proposed project, for example trustworthy AI for ship navigation, or use of Generative AI for maritime automation software safety, are not
presented with a sufficient level of detail to assess the technical robustness. This is minor shortcoming.
The interdisciplinarity aspects of the research are clearly described and the need for specialists from various fields is well justified. The proposal presents a very
well-defined training programme with a clear focus on transferable skills and multidisciplinary approach. The network-wide training is complementary to the local
programmes and the secondments. The secondments are well chosen and justified.
The open science practices to be implemented as well as the access to data is inadequately elaborated and explained. The research data management is not clearly
defined and appropriately linked to the data needs of the project. This is a shortcoming.
The distinction between what training will be made available locally versus at the network-wide training events is very well described. It is also mentioned that the
training program will include transferable skills useful for future careers, as well as considerations for gender and diversity.
The processes for supervision are good and follow the latest MSCA Guidelines on Supervision. Fellows' secondments are relevant and aligned with individual
research objectives. By closely monitoring the research and training progress through regular meetings, a smooth progress of the research tasks will be ensured. For
the individual researcher projects, a two-level progress monitoring strategy to evaluate their progress at both the local Doctoral School/ Beneficiary level and the
Doctoral Network level will be used.
The qualifications, skills, and supervision experience of both academic and non-academic supervisors are appropriately described.
Criterion 2 - Impact
Score: 4.40 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 30.00% )
101227681/HOL-MSAC-17/03/2025-13:25:21 2/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2162850 - 17/03/2025
• Contribution to structuring doctoral training at the European level and to strengthening European innovation capacity, including the potential
for:
a) meaningful contribution of the non-academic sector to the doctoral training, as appropriate to the implementation mode and research field
b) developing sustainable elements of doctoral programmes.
• Credibility of the measures to enhance the career perspectives and employability of researchers and contribution to their skills development.
• Suitability and quality of the measures to maximise expected outcomes and impacts, as set out in the dissemination and exploitation plan,
including communication activities.
• The magnitude and importance of the project’s contribution to the expected scientific, societal and economic impacts.
The contribution of the non-academic partners to the research and training activities is clearly presented and well-justified. The proposal explains that the projects
are tailored to create a future cooperation.
However, the development of sustainable elements of the doctoral programs is only briefly mentioned. This is a minor shortcoming.
The measures to contribute to the researchers' skills development is fully credible, with a proposed combination of technical expertise, practical experience, and
transferable skills.
The proposal does not provide a sufficient level of detail on how the project and training will improve the employability of the DCs. This is a minor shortcoming.
Communication, dissemination and exploitation measures are broadly outlined. However, the target groups are not identified in sufficient detail. This is a minor
shortcoming.
The strategy for the management of intellectual property is broadly outlined and protection measures to enable future exploitation of results are appropriately
addressed.
The proposal clearly presents credible and convincing scientific, economic and societal impacts of the research and activities.
Criterion 3 - implementation
Score: 4.80 (Threshold: 3 / 5.00 , Weight: 20.00% )
• Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, assessment of risks and appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages.
• Quality, capacity and role of each participant, including hosting arrangements and extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the
necessary expertise.
The work plan is detailed, coherent, and well structured around the relevant work packages. The deliverables list and specified due dates and milestones are well
planned and appropriate providing a solid base to measure the progress of the project. The allocation of tasks and resources is fully in line with the research
objectives. The individual research projects are well detailed and integrated into the relevant work packages.
The description of risks and mitigation measures are very well elaborated and convincingly presented. However scientific misconduct is inadequately considered.
This is minor shortcoming.
The participating organizations demonstrate the capacity, excellent complementarity and infrastructures to execute their planned tasks.
The associated partners are very important for the project and it is clearly presented that they are contributing important knowledge, technology and experience to
the projects.
Scope of the proposal
Status: Yes
Comments (in case the proposal is out of scope)
Not provided
Exceptional funding
A third country participant/international organisation not listed in the General Annex to the Main Work Programme may exceptionally receive funding if
their participation is essential for carrying out the project (for instance due to outstanding expertise, access to unique know-how, access to research
infrastructure, access to particular geographical environments, possibility to involve key partners in emerging markets, access to data, etc.). (For more
information, see the HE programme guide )
Please list the concerned applicants and requested grant amount and explain the reasons why.
Based on the information provided, the following participants should receive exceptional funding:
Not provided
Based on the information provided, the following participants should NOT receive exceptional funding:
Not provided
Use of human embryonic stem cells (hESC)
Status: No
101227681/HOL-MSAC-17/03/2025-13:25:21 3/4
Associated with document Ref. Ares(2025)2162850 - 17/03/2025
If YES, please state whether the use of hESC is, or is not, in your opinion, necessary to achieve the scientific objectives of the proposal and the
reasons why. Alternatively, please state if it cannot be assessed whether the use of hESC is necessary or not because of a lack of information.
Not provided
Use of human embryos
Status: No
If YES, please state how the human embryos will be used in the project.
Not provided
Activities excluded from funding
Status: No
If YES, please explain.
Not provided
Do no significant harm principle
Status: Yes
If Partially/No/Cannot be assessed please explain
Not provided
Exclusive focus on civil applications
Status: Yes
If NO, please explain.
Not provided
Artificial Intelligence
Status: Yes
If YES, the technical robustness of the proposed system must be evaluated under the appropriate (excellence?) criterion.
Overall comments
Not provided
101227681/HOL-MSAC-17/03/2025-13:25:21 4/4
Digitally sealed by the European Commission
Date: 2025.03.17 15:35:31 CET
This electronic receipt is a digitally signed version of the document submitted by your
organisation. Both the content of the document and a set of metadata have been digitally
sealed.
This digital signature mechanism, using a public-private key pair mechanism, uniquely
binds this eReceipt to the modules of the Funding & Tenders Portal of the European
Commission, to the transaction for which it was generated and ensures its full integrity.
Therefore a complete digitally signed trail of the transaction is available both for your
organisation and for the issuer of the eReceipt.
Any attempt to modify the content will lead to a break of the integrity of the electronic
signature, which can be verified at any time by clicking on the eReceipt validation
symbol.
More info about eReceipts can be found in the FAQ page of the Funding & Tenders
Portal.
(https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/support/faq)
Commission européenne/Europese Commissie, 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel, BELGIQUE/BELGIË - Tel. +32 22991111