Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Selgitustaotlus
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon · 1. detsember 2025
- Viit
- 2.2-9/25/3925-1
- Registreeritud
- 1. detsember 2025
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Adressaat
- Estonian B2B SaaS
- Saabumis/saatmisviis
- e-post
- Funktsioon
- 2.2 Loa- ja teavitamismenetlused
- Sari
- 2.2-9 Selgitustaotlused
- Toimik
- 2.2-9/2025
- Vastutaja
- Liina Kroonberg (Andmekaitse Inspektsioon, Koostöö valdkond, Koolitus- ja ennetustiim)
- Lahendamise tähtaeg
- 8. detsember 2025
Failid
Sisu (failidest)
Saatja: "Oleh Konko" <[email protected]>
Saaja: "info - AKI" <[email protected]>
Teema: GDPR clarification for Estonian B2B SaaS (business contacts only)
Kuupäev: 2025-11-30 19:39
Tähelepanu! Tegemist on välisvõrgust saabunud kirjaga.
Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada.
Hello,
We operate a small B2B SaaS infrastructure tool under the 1seal project,
via Mudria OÜ (Estonia).
Our service processes only business email addresses and basic contact
details of institutional clients (no consumer data, no special categories,
no profiling).
I would like to kindly ask for clarification on the minimal GDPR
expectations for such a micro-enterprise:
1.
How should records of processing activities under Article 30 be
handled for a very small controller in this situation?
2.
In a B2B-only context (business contacts of client organisations),
when would a DPO appointment become necessary, if at all?
3.
Are there any recommended retention periods or best practices for
business contact information used only for service provision and
invoicing?
Use case: offline-verifiable transaction receipts for institutional
clients – only business contact details, no private individuals.
This is a request for non-binding compliance guidance, not a complaint.
Thank you in advance for any pointers or links to existing materials.
Best regards,
Oleh Konko
[email protected]