dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
Otsing›Astangu Kutserehabilitatsiooni Keskus
Väljaminev kiriAvalik

kiri välja Koeru Hooldekeskuse auditi raport Brüsselisse

Astangu Kutserehabilitatsiooni Keskus · 11. jaanuar 2016
Viit
6-9/21-1
Registreeritud
11. jaanuar 2016
Dokumendi liik
Väljaminev kiri
Funktsioon
6 Arendustegevus
Sari
6-9 Euroopa Sotsiaalfondi projektide toimikud
Toimik
6-9/2016
Vastutaja
Kristi Viisimaa

Failid

  • 📎Additional Information Form _SA Koeru Hooldekeskus 1.pdf345 KB
  • 📎Asutuse külastuse ettevalmistuse vorm- Koeru HK.pdf356 KB
  • 📎EQ-ASS_AUD_Audit Report-Koeru HK.pdf373 KB
  • 📎EQUASS taotluvorm_SA Koeru Hooldekeskus-1.xlsx
  • 📎kiri välja_Koeru Hooldekeskus auditi raport Brüsse.pdf37 KB

Sisu (failidest)

EQUASS ASSURANCE ASUTUSE KÜLASTUSE ETTEVALMISTAMISE VORM Asutuse külastus: 15-16. detsember 2015 SA Koeru Hooldekeskus Audiitor: Epp Sillaste © 2012 by European Quality for Social Services (EQUASS) Kõik õigused kaitstud. Antud dokumendi elemente ei tohi paljundada, kopeerida ega muul elektroonilisel moel salvestada ilma EQUASS kirjaliku loata. Asutuse külastuse ettevalmistamise küsimused EQ U AS S As s ur a n c e t ao t lus v or m i le j a a nt ud l is ai nf orm ats i oo n i l e p õh i n ed es pa l um e te i l e tt e va lm is t us ek s v as t at a j är g ne v at e l e s e l gi t us t n õ ud v at e l e k üs i m us tel e : Üldised teemad (max. 10 küsimust) 1. M i d a o le t e v i im as e 2 a as t a j o ok s ul e tt e v õt n ud , e t s uu re nd a da k l ie nt i d e, k lie n ti d e l äh e d as t e r a hu l o lu t ee n us t e k v a l it ee d i ga ? 2. Mi d a o l et e vi im as e 2 a as ta j ook s u l e tt e v õ tn u d, e t t õ hus ta d a k oos t ö öd om a k oos t öö p ar t n er i t eg a j a s u ur en d ad a n e nd e ra hu l o lu ? 3. K as k li e nt i de I nd i v i du a als e tes te g e vus p la a ni d es o n f ik s e er i tu d m õõ de ta v a d s pe ts i if i l is e d e es m är g i d j a k as ut at a v ad m eet od i d/s ek k um is ed? 4. K u id as t o im ub k lie n ti d e in d i v id u aa ls et e t e ge v us pl a a ni d e ees m ärk id e ja tu l em us te m õõtm i ne ? 5. Ku i das on t e en us e os u t am is e k ä i gus k ai ts tu d k l i en d i õ i gus e d? 6. K u i das o l e te l ä h en e nu d e e lm is e a ud it i 6- l e p are n dus e tt e pa n ek ul e - p a lu n nä i d ak e. 7. K as ol e te v i im as e 2 aas t a j o ok s ul t u vas t a nu d tak is tus i , m is e i v õ im al da s uj u v a l t te e nus t os ut ad a j a k as o n n ä it e id , k us o l et e s e ll ek s m id ag i e tt e v õ t nu d ? 8. P a lu n k ir j e ld a ge lü h i da l t om a or g an is ats i o on i i g a - aas tas t te g e vu s te p l an e er im is e j a aru a n dl us e pr ots es s i. 9. Pa l un t o o ge n ä i de /p aar nä i d et i n no v a ts i o o n is t t e ie or g a nis a ts i o o n is . 10 . Mi l l is e id p ar e nd us i om a t ee n us t es o l et e v i im as e k a h e aas t a j ook s u l e ll u vi i n ud ? Version 1.0 2 1. Kvaliteedi põhimõtetele ja EQ U ASS Assurance kriteeriumitele vastavuse küsimused / teemad: Te en us e s a aj a d Kv al i te e d i ju ht J uh t/ dir ek tor Huv i gr up i d P ers o n a l Juht im in e 1. K u id as l o od i or g a nis ats i oo n i m is s i oo n j a v is io o n n in g m i l vi is i l ta g at i s e l l e x k om m unik a ts i o on k õ ig i l e o lu l is t e l e os a p oo l te l e ? 2. P a lu n t ut v us t a ge j a nä i d ak e, k u id as to im ub t e ie org a ni s a ts i oo n is te g e vus t e p la n eer im in e , t öö s s e rak en d am ine , x tu l em us te h i n dam i ne j a p are n dus t e te g em in e ehk PD C A ts ük k el. 3. K u id as k o g ut e er i ne v at e lt hu v i gr up p i de l t ta g as is i de t j a k as o l et e x x x s e ll es t tu l en e v a lt om a te g e vus tes m id a gi m uutn u d? P er so na l 1 K u id as h i nn a tak s e t e ie or g a n is a ts io o n is pe rs o na l i l e s ea t ud x x tö öt i n gim us i? 2 K u id as h i nd a te p ers on a l i k om pe te nts e ? x x 3 K u id as t ag a te t ur v al i s e tö ök es k k onna n in g k u i das t o im ub t öö k es k k onna x h in d am in e? Version 1.0 3 4 K as j a k u i das t o im ub t e ie or g a n is a ts io o n is pe rs o na l i x x tu n nus tam i ne ? 5 K as j a k u i das h i n da t e p ers o n a li x x k ool i tus te ef ek ti i vs us t ? Õ igu se d 1. Ku i das t o im ub k li e n ti d e i nf or m eer im in e tem a õ i gus tes t j a x x k ohus tus tes t ? 2. Ku i das on t a ga t ud p ers o n a l i te a dl ik k us x k lie n d i õ ig us t es t j a k o hus t us t es t ? 3. K u id as o l et e a v a ld a nu d k li e nt i de l e to et us t ne n de is e x x ots us t am is e / en es em äära t lus e os as ? 4. Ku i das t o im ib t e ie k ae b us t e m enet l em is e pr o ts es s , k as t e i l on pr es e nt e er id a m õ ni k o nk ree tn e x x j uh tum /n ä i de /n ä it e i d k ae b us t e m enet l em is e j a l a h en d am is e k o ht a ? 4. Kas h i n da t e i ga- a as tas e lt k oos te e nus e s a aj a te g a om a k ä it um is t x x x te e nus e s a aj a te e n es em äär am is õ ig us es t l ug u pi d am is e os as ? E et i k a 1. Ku i das (m i l v i is il) o n tö ö taj ad i nf or m eer it u d or ga n is a ts i o on i e e tik a po l i it ik as t ni n g k ä it um i s e x põ h i pr in ts ii p i des t j a v ä ärt us t es t te e nus e os u t am is e l? 2. K as te i l o n t uu a m õn i n ä id e ed us am m udes t tu r va l i s us e j a x ter v is ek ai ts e t a g am is e l t ee n us e os u t am is e as uk oh as ? Version 1.0 4 3. K u id as t ag a tak s e t e en us e s a aj a te k onf id e nts i aa ls us j a is ik ua n dm ete x x k aits e? 4. K u id as h i nd a te om a k äit um is e/ t eg e v us t e ef ek ti i vs us t t ee n us e x s aaj at e f üüs i l is e, va im s e v õ i f in a nts i l is e är ak as ut am is e e n n et a m is el ? 5. Koo st öö suh t ed 1. K u id as t o im ub k oos t öö s ots i aa l p art n eri t e n in g ra h as t aj a t eg a x x x te e nus e s a aj a te l e t ee n us t e os ut am is e ees m är gi l ? 2. K u id as t o im ub k oos t öö t e en us te x x x x ar e n d am is e l? 3. M i l l is t e k ri t eer i um it e a lus e l h i nd at e x x k oos t öös u he tes t t ul e n e va t l is a n d vä är tus t ? O s al em in e 1. K as o n k ok k u l ep i tu d j a k õi g il e x x os a p oo l te l e t ea d a, k ui das t e en us e s aaj a d os a l e v ad t e en u s te v ä lj a tö öt am is e l j a k va l it e ed i /t u lem us t e h in d am is e l? 2. K u id as o n t ee n us e s aaj a id j õ us ta tu d ? x x 4. K u id as a n al ü üs it e te en us e s a aj a te võ i x x x ne n de es i n daj a te / lä h e das t e os a l em is e g a /k aas am is eg a s e ot u d te g e vus i j a pr o ts e d uur e ( n en d e Version 1.0 5 ef ek ti i vs us t) ? Is ik uk e sk su s 1. K u id as o l et e k i n dl ak s t e in u d x po t en ts ia a ls e t e te e nus e s a aj a te v aj a d us e d ? 2. P a lu n k irj e ld a g e j a n ä id ak e, k ui das x x o le te t o im in u d, k ui t ee nus e s a aj a o luk or d j a v aj a d us e d o n m uu tu n u d n in g es ia l gs e l t k o os t at u d p l aa n e i o l e e nam v aj a d us t e le vas t a v. 3. M i l v i is i l t e et e k in d la k s ol u lis t e x x hu v i gr up p i de vaj a dus e d? 4. Kas o l et e t e in u d m u ud a tus i om a x x x te e nus tes ( v õ i l oo n ud uus i t e en us ei d) l äh tu v a lt t e en us e s a aj at e v aj ad us t es t, ne i l t s aa d ud t a gas is i d es t ? P a lu n t o og e nä i d e/ nä i te i d. Lai ah a ar de li su s 1. K u id as m õ õd at e k li e nd i e l uk v al i te e t i x par e n da v at e t eg e v us t e ef ek t i i vs us t? 2. K u id as t ag a te , et t e en us e x os u t am is e ga s e o tu d p eam is ed pr o ts es s i d o n vas ta v u s es te e nus e os tj at e j a r a h as t aj a te po o lt t e ht u d et te p an ek ut e/m ärk us t e ga ? 3. M i ll is e i d m ee tm ei d o m a x or g a n is a ts io o n is r ak en da t e, e t ta g ad a k lie n ti d e le n e n de vaj a dus t el e vas ta v k atk em atu t e e nus ? Version 1.0 6 4. K u id as a i ta te pers o n a li l ar e n da d a X x om a os k us i j a k om pe t en ts e te e nus e s aaj at e e l uk va l i te e d i t õs tm is ek s ? T ulemu st el e 1. Ku i das o le te k om m un ik eer i nu d om a x x x ori en t e e rit u s te g e vus te t ul em us t e a rua n d ed o l u l is t e le hu v i gr up p i de l e? 2. K u id as m õ õd at e t ee nus e s a aj a t e x x x x r ah u l o lu j a m il l is ed o n t u lem us e d ? 3. K as o le t e r a hu l p os it s i oo n ig a ra h u lo l u x s k aal a l? 4. 5. Pi dev a r eng 1. P a lu n pr es en te er i ge üh e võ i k ah e x nä i te ab i l P DC A ts ük l i to im i vus t te i e or g a n is a ts io o n is 2. P a lu n t oo g e n äi d e i n no v a at i l is es t x tö öm eet o d is t . 3. P a lu n t oo g e ük s ar e nd us pr oj ek ti x nä i d e. 4. 5. Version 1.0 7 3. Nõutav dokumentat sioon EQ U AS S As s ur anc e ta ot l us es s e m ärg i tu d i nf o le j a lis a de l e p õh i n ed es pa l um e v aa t lus ek s e tt e v a lm is ta d a j är g n e v d ok um ent ats i oo n : 1. T ege v us p la a n j a i gak u i ne h i n dam i ne 2. K l ie nt i d e k o os o l ek ut e pr o t ok ol l i d 3. P ers o n a li p o l ii t ik a 4. Ris k i a na l üüs 5. Ar en g u ves t lus t e k ok k uv õt e 6. Am et ij u h en d 7. T een i n dus s ta n da r d i d 8. K oo l it us p la a n 9. Str uk tu ur i ük s us t e j uh t i de k oos o lek u pr o tok o l l i d 10 . Is ik u an dm et e tö ö tl em i s e k or d 11 . R eh a b il i ta ts io o n ip l a a n 12 . T ag as is i d e le h t k oo l i tu s te k oh ta 13 . K ae b us t e l a he n dam is e k or d 14 . Nõ uk og u k o os o l ek u pr ot ok ol l 15 . V an em ho o ld aj at e k o os o lek u pr ot ok o ll Version 1.0 8 4. Personali, teenuse saajate ja teiste oluliste huvi gruppide intervjueerimine EQ U AS S As s ur anc e t ao t lus es an tu d v as t us te l e j a t õ en d it e l e p õh i ne d es p a lum e k orral d ad a i n ter vj u ud j är gm is te in im es t eg a (f unk ts io o n j a k es t v us ) : Juhtkond Kestvus 1. O rg an is ats i o on i j u ht 30m i n 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Personal Kestvus 1. P ers on a l igr u pp nr 1 - k un i 5 t ö öt aj a t 45m i n 2. P ers on a l igr u pp nr 2 - k un i 5 t ö öt aj a t 45m i n 4. 5 6. Teenuse saajad Kestvus 1. K l i en d i gr u p p 1, 2 - m õlem as k u ni 5 45m i n +4 5m in k lie n ti ( er in e v at e te e n us e k l ie n di d) . Version 1.0 9 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Teised huvigrupid Kestvus 1. Ra h as t aj a es i n d aj a 30m i n 2. P eam is e k oos tö ö p ar t n er i es i n daj a d 45m i n (s o o vi t a va l t k or rag a) ( v äh em al t 2) 3. K l ie nt i d e l äh e das e d ( v äh em al t 3 ) 45 m in (s o o v it a v a lt k orra ga) 4. 5. 6. 5. Asutuse kül astuse ajakava formaat 9.15-10.00 Auditi protsessi tutvustus , põgus tutvum ine Koer u HK -ga 10.00-13.00 Tutvumine dokumentatsiooniga 13.00-13.30 Lõunapaus 13.45-14.15 Inter vjuu peamiste koostööpartneritega*** 14.15-15.30 Auditi dokumentatsiooni koostamine 15.30-16.15 Inter vjuu personaligrupiga nr 1 * Version 1.0 10 16.15-17.00 Kohtumine kliendigrupiga nr 1** 17.00-.17. 30 Audit i dokumentatsiooni koostamine 2 P ÄEV 9.00-9.45 Inter vjuu personaligrupiga nr 2* 10.00-10.45 Kohtumine kliendig rupiga nr 2** 12.00-12.30 Inter vjuu rahastajaga 12.30-13.00 Lõuna 13.15-14.00 Inter vjuu klient ide lähedastega **** 14.00-14.30 Inter vjuu juhatajaga 14.30-16.30 Auditi dokumentatsiooni koostamine 16.30- Auditi lõpetamine ja tagasiside andm ine *Personaligruppidesse 1, 2 võiks kuuluda erinevaid vahetult klientidega kokku puutuvaid spetsi aliste (v.a juhid), ühes grupis 3 kuni 5 töötajat. ** Kliendigruppidesse 1, 2 palun kutsuda samuti 3 kuni 5 klienti ühes grupis. *** Peamise koost ööpartneri intervjuul oleks soov kohtuda vähemalt 2 teie organisatsiooni koostööpart neriga, kellega on teil kõige enam kokkupuudet. **** Klientide lähedaste gruppi võiks kuuluda kuni 3 inimest. Version 1.0 11 EQU ASS ASSU R ANCE AU DIT REPORT Site visi t: 15-16.12.2015 Koeru Hoo ldek eskus SA Epp Si llaste © 2012 by European Quality for Social Services (EQUASS) All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the EQUASS. 1. Information of t he socia l se rvice provider Name of the s ocial service p rovider Koeru Ho oldek eskus SA Add re ss : Ida 2, Koeru, 73001 Jä rvamaa Post bo x: Person res ponsi ble rynno.lass @ko eruhk.ee (CE O): Contact pe rs on: Monika N ee msalu, pe rsonnel and commu nic ation specialist Phone : +372 38 39210 Fax : +372 38 3 920 5 E-mail: rynno.lass @ko eruhk.ee Web site : w ww.koeruhk.e e Name of Auditor: Epp Sillast e Dates of a udit : 15-16.12.2015 Cli ents: Num ber of person served: 215 As of (date): per ye ar (16.12.20 15) Staff: Num ber of Full t ime staff : 107 Num ber of Part tim e staff : 7 Num ber of C ontracte d staff : Num ber of volunteer s (if applicable ) 2 Servic es : 24 hour c areta king w ith reinforc ed supe rvision 3 2. Aud it program DAY 1 9.15-10.00 Aud iti protses s i tut vust us, põg us tutvum in e Koeru HK-ga 10.00-13.00 Tutv um ine dok um ent atsi ooniga 13.00-13.30 Lõuna paus 13.45-14.15 Intervjuu peam iste k oostööpartneritega* ** 14.15-15.30 Audit i doku m ent atsiooni koos tam ine 15.30-16.15 Intervjuu person al igr up iga nr 1* 16.15-17.00 Kohtum ine kliendigrupi ga nr 1** 17.00-.17.30 Audit i doku m ent atsiooni koos tam ine DAY 2 9.00-9.45 Int ervjuu perso nal igrupiga nr 2 * 10.00-10.45 Kohtum ine kliendigrupig a nr 2** 12.00-12.30 Intervjuu rahastaja ga 12.30-13.00 Lõuna 13.15-14.00 Intervjuu klient ide lä hedaste ga**** 14.00-14.30 Intervjuu juhatajag a 14.30-16.30 Audit i doku m ent atsiooni koos tam ine 16.30- Audit i lõ peta m ine ja tagasisi de andm in e 4 3. Detai led feedback on pe rfo rmance 1. The social ser vice provid er def ines d ocum ents and im plem ents its vis ion and m ission v alues on s er vic e pro vis ion. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru Hooldek es kus def in es, docum ents, and im plem ents its vis ion an d m ission on servic e provision c lea rl y and precis el y. During the interv iew s was va li date d that em ployees and externa l custom ers are aware of the vision, m ission a nd corporat e values. 2. The social servic e provider def in es , docum ents, and im plement s its qua lit y po lic y b y determ inin g long term qualit y goa ls, and its comm i tment to conti nuous im provem ent. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 5 Koeru H oo ldek eskus def ines its qua lit y policy and princ iples in Deve lopm ent Plan ( Strategy, longer period) an d Qua lit y Prom otion and Leadership Ac tion Plan ( yearl y) , and has im plem e nted its qua lit y po lic y by determ inin g long term qualit y goals, qua lit y obj ectiv es a nd its com mi tm ent to conti nuo us im provem ent. Staff m emb ers consi der all the qua lit y p olicies and procedures an d other docum ents that r egulat e the servic e del iver y a s gu idelines on their work . 3. Person s served, f am ily m em bers and service us er orga nis ati ons ar e abl e t o give f ee db ac k on their ind iv idual and collect ive exper ience of programm e s and ser vice s. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 6 There are se veral possibil it ies f or giv in g and c ol lec tin g f eedback- organ izat ions hom epage (satisf action wit h servic es, com plaints), satisf action su rve ys, m eetings for clients and s pecialists. Colle cting f eedback f rom f under and m ain co-partners is organized m ostly through m eetings or e-m ail. During the interv iew s was va li dated that the stak ehol ders have opportunit y to give f eedba ck . 4. The social ser vice provider inf orm s all stak ehol ders a bout the off ered programm es and serv ices ava ilable. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru Hoo ldek eskus inf orm s its stakeholders about programm es and servic es ava ilable m ostl y t hrough hom epage and on the lobby wal l. Bes ides wr itten distrib ut ion of inf orm ation , there was a lso oral inf orm ation that is distributed to diff erent part ies t hrough different m eetings . Also m eeting prot ocol s were presente d as proof that all relev ant inf orm ation was pr esented to al l interest ed part ies. 7 5. The social ser vice pro vi der m anagem ent establish es and docum ents an annual planning and rev ie w proces s. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents The annu al plann ing and the rev ie w process is doc um ented in the Qua lit y Prom otion a nd Le adership Act io n Plan. Ther e is c lea rl y define d ho w the process is co nd ucted. Ther e is als o proof of annu al pla nn ing and reviewing m eetings protocols. 6. The plan i ncludes: • annual outcom es / targets • the activit ies t o be u ndertaken in achievi ng the annua l t ar ge ts • m onitoring of the per f orm ance of the organisatio n i n m eeting its annual targets • tim e-scales and proc edures for re view an d revis io n. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 8 The a nnu al plann ing is he ld in th e docum ent “Qualit y Prom otion and Leadership Action Plan” . Th e docum ent inclu de d object ives , activ ities, m easurable results, d ates, perf orm ers. Docum ent is appr oved b y m a nager of the organiz ation. 7. The soc ial service provider dem onstr ates organisat ion’s success in satisf ying th e needs and ex pectat ions of the soc iet y. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru Hoold ek esk us co llects f eedback from clients , staff , f under and m ain co-partner s. The f eedback is g iven both in verbal an d written. There is proof of organisations success in sat isf ying the need s and expectat ions of the society. Fr om satisf action surve y we co uld f ind several im provem ent propos als an d during the au dit w e f ound proof on satisf ying th ese n ee ds and m eeting clients expecta tions. Koeru Hoo ldek eskus has a lso pub lished arti cl es. 9 8. The social ser vice provid er dem onstr ates organis at io n’s social responsibilit y through a ctiv ities contributing to the societ y. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents There was proof of organisation`s success in contribut ion to the soci et y. Koeru Hoold ek esk us has organized com munity ba sed events and activ ities (craf t f airs, concerts etc). They off er sauna serv ic e and caf eteria ser vices to lo ca l popula tion. 9. The socia l ser vic e pro vi der h as a staff recruitm ent and r etention polic y that prom otes the selecti on o f qualif ied p ersonnel b as ed on required k no wledge, sk ill s and com petenc es. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 10 Koeru Hooldek esk us has Pers onnel Polic y which consist procedures f or recruitm ent, training a nd retention. Staff is chosen based on their com petences, sk il ls and prev io us work exper ien ce th at are list ed in jo b descr ipt io ns. Re cruitm ent is base d on eq ual opportunitie s and non- discrim ination. 10. The social ser vice pro vi der operat es in com pliance with m andator y natio na l legislat ion, providi ng appropriat e work ing condition s, adequate and agreed staff level and st aff ratio, and ap propriat e rewarding f or staff and v ol unte er s. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 11 Koeru Hoold ek esk us has reviewed its docum entation and work proced ures and assures that it work s in com pliance with nat ional legislati on. There have been audits an d c hecks carrie d o ut int ernall y and b y ext ern al bod ies to ver if y nece ssary com pliance . The social serv ice pro vider has pol ic y f or showin g recognition to staff. Staff members are recogn is ed in m any ways- t hroug h off ered tr ain ing poss ibili ties, s taff engagem ent days and events. Ever y year th e organ izat ion recog nize s on e of their staff m em ber b y choosi ng “W orker of the year”. Work place risk asse ssm ent s ystem is in place a nd rev iewed p eriodicall y. Staff m embers sign t he risk assessm ent docum ent s to sho w th eir understa nd ing of it . 11. The so cial s er vice t rains all st aff based on a pl an f or l eaning and developm ent and ev aluates the eff ectiveness of the train ing. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 12 There is a Tra ining Plan that inclu des There is a sp ecial f orm deve loped to all the nece ssar y t rainings duri ng eva luate th e eff ectiveness of each one yea r period. There are also train ing but there wa s no overa ll intern al train ings f or the staff anal ys is m ade. Auditors suggestion m em bers to be able to prom ote the is t o m a ke t he analysis an d princ ip les set to the service conclus io ns wh ic h m ak es it eas ier to provision. plan eff ective tra inings i n the f uture. Tra in ing act ivit ies are ev aluated, Töötaj ad täid avad küll s pets iaa ls e Staff gives f eedbac k af ter trainings k oolitu se tagasis id e vorm i, k uid with spec ia l f orm s. k ok kuvõte või anal üü s tagas isi dest puud ub. Audiit ori so ovit us on teha analüüsist jä reldusi (personal itöötaja l), mis oleks alusek s edaspi dis te k oolituste planeerim i se l. 12. The soc ia l servi ce pro vider applies requirem ents f or com petenc e in the ident if ied roles and f unction s of staff and evaluates them on annual basis. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 13 Al l the spec ial is ts in Koeru Person ne l Policy d ec lares that Hoo ld ek esk us have a job desc ription developm ent di scuss ions with s taff that cons ist of requirem ents f or are cond ucted ever y ye ar. Fr om work ing in that p articul ar po sition. interv iews with stuff auditor foun d out that m any dev el opm ent Com pete nces of staff are discus sed discuss ions tak e pla ce once aft er 2 and ev al uat ed in staff supervision years. Au ditors suggestion is to m eetings and al so monthly thr ough f ollow the po lic y or change it perf om anc e based rem uneration accor dance with re al life. s ystem . Person al i poliitikas on sätes tatud, et During th e interv ie ws was vali dated töötaj ate arenguvestlus ed viiak se that staff is f amiliar with the läbi k ord aastas. Int ervjuude käigus requirem ents fo r competences and sel gus, et osade tööt ajatega o n als o with t he evaluat ion process. vestlu sed k ord kahe aasta jooksul. Aud iitori ettepan ek on viia personalip oli itik a k ooskõlla tegeliku eluga. Pers onali k om petentsusnõudeid tuleb hinnata iga- aastase lt. Te ie v alik on, ka s te teete seda läbi aren guvestluste v õi m uul viisil (nä itek s l äbi tulem ustasustam ise süsteem i). 13. The soc ia l serv ic e pro vi der recognise s the s taff as a resource f or f eedback on organisatio na l perf orm ance, service development and staff developm ent Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 14 Involv em ent of staff member s in organ isat ions pl anning and m onitoring p roces s is reg ulated b y the Personne l Pol icy. Staff m embers give t heir input to annual p la nn ing, m onitor ing an d review process through spec ia l m eetings but also t hro ugh staff superv ision m eeting s an d satisf action (f eedback ) surve y. 14. The social s ervic e pro vi de r has m echanism s in plac e to enhanc e satisfaction and m otivation of staff Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Staff Satis faction Survey is carr ie d out to get f eedback f rom staff about their sat isf action and m otivation. Staff m emb ers are recogn is ed a lso through offer ed tra in ing poss ib ilit ies, staff engagem ent days a nd ev ent s. Also m onetary re co gnit ion f or specia l and intensive work results . Em ployees who ha ve done d uring the ye ar m ore than is required in job descr ipt io n are rewa rded each year. 15 15. The soc ial ser vice provider assures the right s of persons served outline d in a Charter of Rights which is based on t he EU Charter of Fundam ental R ights, the Eur op ean Convention f or the Pr ote ct ion of Hum an Rights a nd Fundam ental Freedom s of t he Co uncil of Europ e and othe r i nternat io nal hum an rights co nvent ions, es peci all y thos e ela borated und er the United Nat ions. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & develo pm ents Koeru Hooldek esk us has a Charter of Rights and Res pons ibi lities a s part of their Rules of Proc edure and i n the lob by wall and in their hom epag e (f or ever ybo dy to see). Charter of Righ ts an d Resp ons ibilit ies and Equal Opp ortunities Poli cy ref ers to relev ant inter national and Europea n regulations. During the interv iews it was a ls o valid ated that staff is aware of the charter of right s. 16. The soc ia l s ervic e provider inf orm s t he person serv ed a bout his/ he r rights and dut ies es pec ially to eq ual tre atm ent on groun ds of age, dis ab ility, gender, race, rel igion or beli ef and sexual or ie ntat ion before receiving the servic e s. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program 16 Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK inf orm s service users about their rights and duties durin g the f irst evaluat ion and pla nnin g m eeting. Rig hts and duties are also part of Rules and Procedures f or Clients, wh ic h is ava ilable f or all the clients. During the interv iews it was valid at ed that ser vice users are we ll aware of their rights an d dut ie s. 17. The social ser vic e pro vider has a cc essib le c omplaint m anagem ent s ystem which r egiste rs f eedback o n perf orm an ce f rom persons served, purchasers and othe r relevant stak eho ld er s. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Com plaints and inadequac y`s ar e recorded in s pec ial form s. Stakehol ders ar e aware of the right to subm it a c la im in case of a need but servic e users m ostly pref er solv ing problem s through discussion as the y f ind the c om m unication with servic e prov ider eas ier. 17 18. The social service provid er respects t he fu ndam ental right to self - determ inatio n of the person serve d. The y f reel y determi ne t heir pol it ical status and freel y purs ue their econ om ic, social and cultural developm ent. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Right to self- determ ination is regulated with Ch arter of Rights and Resp ons ibilit ies, Com plai nt m anagem ent s ystem . Right to self -deter m ination is al so disc ussed when client is enter ing the servic e- dur in g the evaluation process. Eva luat ion on se lf - determ ination is carrie d out throu gh Se rv ice User Satisf actio n Surv ey, m eeti ngs with clients and supp ort persons and m onitoring of com plaints. 19. The socia l ser vice provid er f acilit ates the person s erved in choos in g and hav ing access to advocat es and/o r supporting persons. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 18 Right to self -determ inati on is disc ussed when cl ient is enter in g the servic e- during the eva luat ion process but also in r egular m eetings with cl ients. Eva luat ion of the perf orm ance in f acilit atin g persons served in hav ing access to support ing persons is organ ized by speci al m eetings. Protocols of these m eeting s were presente d. 20. The social ser vice pro vider defines and d oc um ents its poli cy o n ethics that respects and as sures the dignit y of the persons serv ed, protects them from undue risk and prom otes soci al j ust ice Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Polic y on Ethics is part of Ser vic e Prov isi on Stand ar d (f or staff ) and is gui deline on et hics in th e organ isat ion s ervice prov is i on. Protocols of me etin gs where this pol ic y is pres ented to staff and disc ussed wer e shown. 21. The soc ia l service pro vi der op erates m echanism s which preve nt the phys ical, m ental an d f inancial a buse of users. 19 Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK has doc um ented pol ic ies and proc edu re s t o prevent ph ysical, m enta l and financia l abus e of persons s erved in their Serv ice Prov isi on Sta ndar d and in their intern al work procedur es (a lso clients m oney m anagem ent proced ure). Internal work procedure s are m andator y to all staff m em bers. All staff mem bers sign co nt racts, wh ich conf irm s that they respect am ong other things these pr ocedur es. Koeru HK e va luates th e eff ective ness of its policy to preve nt physic al, m ental and financ ia l abuse of persons serv ed through spec ia l m eetings (once a year). 22. Th e socia l s er vic e provid er provides services in a saf e system of work ing within a safe env ironm ent to ensure the phys ical sec urit y of persons s erved, their f am ilies and caretak ers. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 20 There exists Workplace Risk Assessm ent s yst em . Staff tr ai ning plan c onsist s of trainings f or securi ng He alth and Saf et y at work as prescri bed b y nationa l law (ever y year the y organ ize f ire dr ill). The risk assessm ent also includes a m easures concer ning health an d saf ety iss ues a nd for ensuring saf e env ironm ent and ph ysica l s ecur it y of staff and persons served. 23. The soc ia l ser vice provi der def ines , docum ents, m onit ors an d eva luates a set of principle s, values and proc edures that govern behav io ur in s ervic e del iv er y conta in ing asp ects of conf identia lit y, accurac y, priv acy an d in tegrit y. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru Hool dek eskus has defined, docum ented and is cont inuous ly evaluat ing t he principle s an d proced ures to ensure the servic e del iv er y, wh ich is based on conf ident ialit y, acc ura cy, integrit y and pr ivac y. Protocols of meetings where all th e relev ant topic s were introduced and disc ussed wer e pres ented. 21 24. The soc ia l ser vice provi der def ines , docum ents , m onit ors an d eva luates proced ures f or assuring co nf identia lit y of data regardin g the persons s erved and t he service provided t o them . Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK has doc um ented its Data Protection and Proc essing Polic y. During the interv iew s was va li date d that service users are we ll awar e of their righ t f or con fidentia lit y of dat a. Serv ice u sers k no w ab out their person al f olders and how to access them . Polic ie s are reviewed with staff m em bers and clients regularl y. 25. The soc ial servic e pro vider def ines th e role s a nd responsi bilit ies, author itie s and the i nterrelatio n of all p ersonnel who m anage , design, deliv er, suppor t and eva luate the s erv ice provis ion to per son serv ed. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 22 Koeru Hooldek eskus has def ined the roles and resp onsibiliti es of m anagem ent and a lso the role s an d responsibilitie s and author itie s f or al l staff who are f ocusi ng on clie nt servic e prov iding process. Roles and r espons ibiliti es of spec ialists who c om municate direct ly with c lie nts are doc um ented in job descr ipt io ns and intr od uce d to clients in th eir f irst m eeting with the spec ialist. 26. The social service provid er work s in par tners hip with ot her organ isat ions in the provision of services . Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 23 Koeru H K is working in partners hi p with 1. soci al partners, m ostl y loca l Cultural C entre an d paris h, but a ls o schools, f am ily m embers, guardi ans. 2. Fundin g Age nc y- The Soc ial Insurance Boa rd . Th e c oo-operation is m ostly wit h loca l departm ent. Adde d val ue of its partnersh ip is evaluate d a nnual ly an d developm ents are disc ussed a lso while reviewing the Dev elopm ent Strategy a nd Qua lit y Prom otion and Leadership Actio n P lan ( yearl y) . 27. The socia l service pro vi der work s in partners h ip with pers ons served, purch as ers and other stak eho ld ers in the de ve lop m en t of servic es. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 24 Partnership with pe rsons served in the developm ent on serv ices is organ ized throu gh s pec ial f eedback quest ion naires but also dis c ussed i n clients m eetings. Partnership with f under s in that topic is m ain ly done t hrough special f eedback f orm s. Involv em ent to need s asse ssm ent of persons served i s organised b y clie nt assessm ent m eeting s. 28. The soc ia l service provider inc lud es persons serv ed as act ive partic ip ants in pl anning and ha ve set up appraisal m ad e up of on- goi ng of an on-going structured dialogue process in the m anagem ent of the service, inc lu ding the def initi on of the needs, the def init ion of the services, as well as of the eva luat ion of qualit y. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 25 Persons served partic ipat e in assessm ent of indiv id ua l needs through c lie nt-spec ial ists m eetings. During that m eeting they dis cuss and agree f urther plans and actions an d com pile needs-assessm ent docum ent (Action Pl an). Eva luat ion of rece ived servi ce s is organ ised the sam e way as pl annin g (through m eetings) and Actio n P la n is im pr oved duri ng t hat process. Persons served c an also g ive f eedback of received servic es by Satisf actio n Surv ey. 29. The soc ia l ser vice provider institutes an an nual evaluat ion of partic ip atio n of per sons se rved bot h o n individua l an d/or g ro up basis. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & develo pm ents 26 In int ernal house rules f or persons served th ere is a p rocess f or inv olvem ent of service users. That process is m onitored and evalu ated regularl y on in divi dua l and group lev el. Serv ice U ser Sat isf actio n Surv ey is carrie d out to evaluate the lev el of satisf action with participat ion and inv olvem ent and fam ilies/s upp ort persons ar e involved in that i n case of need. Satisf actio n with inv olvem ent is also disc ussed in cl ients m eetings (individual and co lle ctive level ). 30. The social servic e provider o perates s pec if ic ins trum ents f or users to im prove their per sonal em powerm ent and personal situati on and. that of their comm unity Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 27 Serv ice Pro vi sio n Proce dures and staff tra inings gi ve fram ework f or em powerm ent of service u sers. Exam ples of tangible re sults on em powerm ent were presente d through success stories, clie nt interv ie ws (f or exam ple f orm ation of clients si ng ing gro up , m ore and m ore clients tak e par t of events, clients are helping in everyday work etc). Deve lopm ents of clie nts are st ated in clients ind ividual plans. 31. The soc ia l service pro vi der oper ates spec if ic m echanism s f or estab lishing a n em power ing e nv ironm ent. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 28 Prin ci ples of em powe rm ent are regulated in internal work docum ents. As em powerm ent in m ost cases is som ething very indiv i dua l then spec if ic m easures are put in place to m eet all the specif ic needs of service users. Usua lly through indiv idual pla nning and ev aluat ion pr ocess. The m ost im portant way of em powering clie nts is to find f or each client appropria te ever yd ay work /activ it y, so the y ca n f ee l needf ul and e xp erie nce suc cess. Staff m embers are t rained to support the em po we rm ent of service users. 32. The social service provider se lects pr ogramm es which are based on a needs assessm ent at the location wh ich is m ost conveni ent f or the person served, f amily and care take rs Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 29 Needs of cur rent service users ar e stated i n Individua l Plans . Needs of potential persons serve d are id ent if ied through cooperat ion with partners, Open Da y` s Events and based on an al ys is of each ind iv i dual p lan (con tinu it y needs of servic es). 33. The soc ia l ser vic e provi der offers programm es c ons is tent with the identif ied n eeds of its c ustom ers and o bj ectives f or the program m e. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Funder`s needs are dis cussed and agreed while m akin g service agreem ents. Everyda y c oo peration is organ ised m ostly wit h Funders lo ca l departm ent . Cooperati on with Funders he ad off ice is m ostl y with e- m ails. Reac hing the obje cti ves and m eeting the needs of the persons served is conducted wit h c li ents indiv idual action pla ns. They eva luate t he qua lit y of partne rship with clients (repre sentatives, f am il y), partners and staff periodically. 30 34. The s oc ia l ser vic e pro vi der operates ind ividual pr oces ses that ar e drive n b y the n eeds of the person s erved . Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Needs of persons served are disc ussed a nd agreed from the m om ent clients ar e enter ing th e servic e. Serv ice users have Individ ual Pl ans (action p lan s). Th ese p lans co ntain client´s s pecif ic goals (de sired situ ations , overall goal s, spec if ic m easurable objecti ves, m et hods). Actio n Pl ans are overv iewed and disc ussed with cli ent s perio dica ll y. Clients sign the ir Indiv idual Pl ans. 35. The soci al ser vice pro vider docum ents the pl anning of servic es based on the id ent ificat ion of ind iv idual needs an d ex pectations of persons s erved i n a n Indiv idual Pla n. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 31 Al l ser vic e us er s ha ve an In dividua l Plan. Ind iv idual plans contain t he des ired s ituat ion of t he persons served, goals, m easurabl e obj ectives, int ervent i ons. Each In dividua l Plan is agreed by t he person served or h is /her guardia n. 36. The soc ia l service provid er iden tif ie s, docum ents, and m aintains the ke y serv ic e de liv ery proc es ses to the persons serv ed in li ne with its vision, m issio n statem ent and qua lit y polic y. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents The k ey serv ic e de livery processes are i dent if ied and describe d in Serv ice Pro visio n Pr ocedur es. Process es are revie wed (in terna l aud its) on regular b asis. Ext er na l aud its are organi sed by Soc ial Insurance Board (t he f under). Integration of m ission and qua lit y pol ic y int o t he service del iv er y is evident and staff mem bers are wel l a ware of the qual it y prin ci ple s. 37. The s ocial ser vice provider revie ws this d elivery proc ess an d m aintains c ontro l over the delivery of the servic e. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program 32 Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK m onitors t he perf orm ance of the key serv ice deliver y pr ocess es through i nternal audits (reg ularl y). They hav e conne cte d it with their perf om anc e based rem uneration s ystem, which m eans that they exam ine their s er vice prov ision m onth ly. Reports were m ade availab le f or aud itor. 38. The social service provid er ensures that the pe rs on serv ed can access a c ontinuum of ser vices that span f rom early interv ention to support a nd respond to changin g requi re ments over tim e. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Eva luat ion of continu ing serv ice del iv er y is carr ie d out through perf om anc e based rem uneration s ystem (m onthly) and b y revis io n of ind iv i dual plans. The n a ls o continuity of servic es is d is cussed. Resu lts are als o doc um ented . Koeru HK off ers 10 diff erent service s f or their clients to get the he lp and support the y need. 33 39. The socia l ser vice pro vi der develops a s eam less continu um of servic es and r ed uc es barr iers in a m ulti-disc ip li nar y or m ult i-agenc y setting. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & develo pm ents Koeru H K off ers servic es by differ ent Spec ia lis ts ensuring t hat m ultidis cipl inary appro ach cou ld be app lied. Risk s are eva luated, rep or ted and ana lysed. Barriers are reported in annual reports 40. The soci al service provider operat es service s from a h olist ic approach base d on the ne eds and exp ec tatio ns of the perso n s erve d with th e a im of im proving the qu al it y of life for the person serv ed. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Qua lit y of Lif e and m easures of enhanci ng Qua lit y of Lif e of service users are inte grat ed into person centred planning. Indiv idual plans activ ities are m easured on regular bas is thr ou gh develo pm ent disc uss ion s and als o docum ented. Individua l pla ns are m onitored, result s assess ed a nd reported 34 41. The social ser vi ce pro vi der ident if ies t he needed com petence s, sk ill s and support f or staff to enhance the qual it y of l if e f or person served. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Sk il ls a nd com petencies of staff to enhance qu alit y of lif e of persons served are docum ented in Personne l Polic y and j ob descript ions. Com pete nces of staff are discussed in staff supervi sion m eetings. Tra in ing syst em giv es an oppo rt unit y to be m ore skilled and h ave hi gher com petences in ord er to be able to support and em p ower service users. Koeru HK a lso support s the ir spec ialists t o appl y for prof essiona l certificate i n the ir f iel d of work . 42. The soc ial ser vice provid er identifies its business res ul ts and provides f orm al peri odic and indep endent revie w and proce dures to achieve t he targeted results. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 35 Koeru HK h as annu al plan where they s et the ye ars objectives and activ ities and strateg y docum ent f or lon ger per iod. They m ea sure their perf orm ances aga inst busi ness ob jectives once a ye ar and com pile speci al report. This report is m ade available for all stakeholders. External audits are carried out to m easure the p er f ormance and results (by Fun ders , Env ironm ental Inspectorat e, Veteri nar y an d Food Board). T he y also ha ve to repor t t heir result s to their Board. 43. The social ser vi ce provider iden tif ie s and registers the outcom es and be nef its f or perso n serv ed of the rec eive serv ices on indi vi dual and collective basis. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents W ithin ind iv id ual pl anning proce ss each in di vi dual’s outc om es and benef its are measured. The achieved resul ts and ben ef its of the received serv ic es o n collectiv e bas is are als o m easured (satisf action su rve ys) and docum ented. 36 44. The social servic e provider eva luat es its bu s iness results in or der to determ i ne b es t value f or purc hasers and f unde rs (‘best value ’ can als o be expressed in relat ion to t he incre ased qualit y of lif e off ered to the person being se rved). Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Annu al Re ports and Satisf action Surve ys Repo rts ref lect added valu e of the servic es. These r epo rts are presente d to all re le vant stakeholders. Clients Indiv id ua l plans wi th obj ectives an d be nef its are regular ly evaluate d which ens ures that adde d value of t he serv ices f or qualit y of lif e is m onitored. 45. The socia l ser vic e provi der eva luat es the individual and collect ive satisfaction of persons served a nd oth er stak eholders by intern al and/or externa l eval uation . Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 37 To co lle ct f eedback and m eas ur e the satisf action of persons served, f unding bod ies and co-partn er s is one part of organi sations Qua lit y Polic y. Satisf actio n Surv ey of persons served and partn er s is carried out af ter 2 years. There are spec ia l f eedback f orm s and i ntervie ws organ ised f or that matter. Clients can give f eedback relatio n to satisf action al so t h rough regu lar m eetings . Funders f eedback related to satisf action is asked once a year an d als o docum ented. 46. The social service provider prov ides acc ess ible and easil y understa ndable rec ords on outcom e, inc luding p ersona l perce ption and ac hi evem ents Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 38 Al l the relevant report s- annua l pla ns, annu al repo rts, sa tisf action surve y re port are ava ilable in organ isat ions webpage and on s ite. The conte nt of the se docum ents are disc ussed in regu lar client and s taff m eetings . The docum ents co ntain also person al percept ions and achi evem ents. 47. The social ser vice provider activel y dis sem inates o rgan isation perf orm ance am ong its staff , servi ce users and extern al stakeho lders. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 39 Inf orm ation about organ isat ions perf om anc e, results and even ts are avail able on organ is ation s webp age, Inf o stands. The y provi de inf orm ation als o b y e-m ails. Annu al re ports wit h annual results, achievem ents and p ersonal percept ions are provided to diff erent stakeholders onc e a ye ar. Resu lts are dis cuss ed in m eetings with Board m embers, staff and ind iv i dual achi ev em ents and percept ions of service us ers are disc ussed on individual b ases. Al l r elevant protoc o ls of m entioned m eetings were pre sented and interv ie ws confirm ed th eir occurren ce. 48. Th e soc ia l s er vic e provider has a standard procedure f or conti nuous im provem ent on the ba si s of an im provem e nt cycle. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents 40 Organi satio n compiles Qu alit y Prom otion and Le adership Act ion Plan for one year and Deve lopm ent Plan f or longer per iod. Perf orm ance in dicators are m easured at the e nd of the year (Qualit y Prom ot ion an d L eadership Actio n Plan, Annu al Report). Ther e exists a PDC A cyc le in annua l pla nning an d it`s re vie wing process. Qua lit y im provem ent proj ects were docum ented. 49 The s oc ia l s er vice provider iden tif ie s perform ance indic ato rs f or m easuring the results of the im provem e nt ac tions. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK has perf orm ance ind icators f or m easuring t he results of all th eir im provem ent proj ects in their annua l pla n. Im provement projects obj ectives are def ined and res ults m easured. 50. The ser vice provid er intr oduc es an d m anages innovati ve wa ys of work ing t hat have be en ident if ied bas ed on the nee ds of stak eholders. Rem ark from the audit or: The servi ces of the soc ial se rv ic e providers m eet this criterion of the EQUASS Ass uran ce cer tif ication program 41 Strengths Im provem ent & developm ents Koeru HK m anages innovat ive wa ys of work ing th at have been id entif ied based on the needs of stak eholders. For exam pl e ne w action and p lay ground f or their clients, ne w activ ities and a lso openi ng ne w corpus in t heir build ing to off er servic es in better c ondit ions f or their clients. They ar e dev el op ing their s ervices and f inding ways to us e i nno vatio n i n their work with client s. Innovat ion projects are docum ented in the ir Annua l P la n and R epor ts. 42 4. Agreed a ddi tional deve lopment / imp rove ments Target Activities Date Continuous improvement of • Building new corpus for clients with 12.2017 physical environment in mixed disability order to increase the quality • Repair works at dining hall, terrace, C of service provision corpus, B corpus. Elaboration of marketing • Developing cooperation with new 12.2017 strategy in order to partners in international and internal promote services to level different stakeholders • Experimentation and introduction of (clients, partners) new and different media and marketing channels Deve lopm ent of Job • Monitoring of current system and 12.2017 perf om anc e identifying „bottlenecks“ m anagem ent and • Collecting feedback from staff perf om anc e based • Making improvements to current rem unerat io n s yst em system Eesmärk Tegevus Tähtaeg Füüsilise keskkonna • Uue korpuse ehitamine liitpuudega 12.2017 parandamine klientidele peahoonest eemal suurendamaks teenuse • C osakonna soojustamine ja osutamise kvaliteeti renoveerimine • Toitlustuskorpuse terrassi remont ja haljastuse uuendamine • Söögisaali remont • B osakonna siseuste vahetamine Hooldekeskuse • Koostöö arendamine nii siseriiklike kui 12.2017 turundustegevuse välja välispartneritega töötamine uutele • Erinevate meediakanalite kaasamine sihtgruppidele ning keskuse turundustegevusse olemasolevate tegevuste edasiarendamine Töösoorituse juhtimise ja • Olemasoleva süsteemi monitooring 12.2017 tulemustasustamise • Personali tagasiside olemasolevale süsteemi edasiarendamine süsteemile • Süsteemi parendamine 43 5. Closi ng remarks Koeru Hooldek esk us ce lebrated in 2015 their 65. birthday a nd is the o ldest and biggest we lf are inst itutio ns in Jär vam aa. Toda y Koeru H ool deke skus off ers 10 different types of services. They ha ve expanded their services duri ng the la st ye ars bas ed on soc iet y n eeds. Koeru Hoold ek esk us applies EQU ASS qual if icat ion f or 1 service- 24 hour caretak ing with reinf orced superv is io n. The y are off er ing servi ces for 215 clients, from whic h 97 are in 24 hour caretak ing with reinf or ced superv ision servic e. Th eir o ldest cl ient is 93 ye ars old and youngest 19. At the m om ent there are 109 em plo yees working in the organ izat ion. Staff turnover over the last 3 years has de creased f rom 18,7% in 201 3 to 11% in 2015 and i nterv ie ws with staff showed satisf action wit h work and wor king conditions. Every year they org anis e diff erent events to involve t heir client s, partners and staff to various act i vities. The y h av e s om e traditional eve nts, f or ex am ple every ye ar they visit different plac es (excurs ions ), harvest par ty in autum n and at christm as tim e they celebr ate and ha ve eve nt s with all t heir c lients and staff. The y acknowledge good wo rk and d evel opme nt of their s taff , every yea r they prom ote one of their staff m ember by c hoos ing the best em plo yee of the yea r. Audit lasted 2 days. Al l the intervi ews took place in tim e. Intervie ws with staff gave confirm ation of comm itm ent and m otivation towar ds their work. Interviews with partners gave overview of organisat ions c ontribution and com m itment towards cooperation. Meeti ng with c lients s ho wed s atisf action with s ervices, people and environm ent. 44 The criteri a f or developm ent a nd im provement fr om the auditors point of vie w, based on 2-days au dit are the f ollowing: Criter ia 11: There is a s pecial form deve loped to eva lua te t he eff ectiv enes s of each traini ng but there was no ov erall anal ys is m ade. Audit ors suggest ion is t o ma ke t he anal ysis and conclusions wh ich m akes it ea sier t o plan eff ective trai nings in the f uture. Criter ia 12: Personnel Pol ic y d ec lares th at developm ent discussi ons wi th staff are conducted ever y year. From interv iews wi th stuff audit or f ound out that m an y deve lopm ent dis cuss ions tak e place onc e af ter 2 years. Auditors sugge stion is to fol low the po lic y or chan ge it accorda nce wit h real lif e. Koeru Hooldek esk us in th e sc ope of th is audit f ully m eet the criter ia of EQUASS Assuranc e. Evi denc e gi ven and intervie ws carrie d out were suff ici ent to prove the com plia nce to EQUASS principles. Kokkuvõte Koeru Hooldek esk us tähista s 20 15. aastal om a 65. sünnipäeva olles Järvam aa van im aid ja suurim aid hoolek andeas ut usi . Keskus on v iim astel aastatel om a teenuste v al ik ut jõud salt la iendanu d pak kudes täna kümm et erinevat teen ust. Koeru Ho oldek esk us taotleb Equass sertif ik aati vaid ühele teenu sele - ööpäevarings ele eri hoold usteenusele. Täna pak utak se teenust 215- le k lie nd ile aastas, k ell est 97 klienti on ööpäevaringsel erihoolduteenus el. Kesk use vanim k lient on 93 aastane ning noorim 19. Koeru Hoold ek esk uses töötab 109 töötaj at. Person al i vo olavus on v iim ase 3 aastaga k ahanenud 18,7%- t 2013. aasta l 11%-le 201 5. aastal. Audit i aja l läb i viidud inter vj uud k innitasid personali rah ulo lu töö j a töötingim ustega. Keskus org anise erib igal aastal erinev ai d üritu si om a k lienti dele, partnerite le ning t öötaj atele. Tradits ioo niks on saa nu d lõik us pidu süg is el, ek s kursioon id erinevatess e paik adesse ning tradits ioon ilis ed ürit used ja k ontsert id jõuluajal. Igal a astal valib keskus om a parim a töötaja, k es saab väärilise tunnustuse . Audit k estis 2 päeva. Kõik int ervjuud leids id as et k okk ulepitud aegad el. Intervj uud personaliga andsid k inn it ust töötaj ate püh endum usest ja 45 m otivatsioo ni st om a töö vastu. Intervjuud k oostööpartneritega k innitasid, et Koeru Hoold ek esk us panustab k oostöösse ning hindab seda. Intervjuud k lient ide ga ands id ülevaate, et ollak se rahul nii teen use k ui ka spetsialist ide ning k eskk onnaga. Are ndusettepanekud, mis põhinev ad 2- päevasel auditil on järg mis ed: Kriteer ium 11: Töötajad täid avad k üll spets ia al se k oolituse t agas is ide vorm i, k uid kokk uvõte või ana lüüs tag asisidest puudub. Audiitor i soov itus on t eha ana lüü sist järeldusi (personalitöötaja l), m is olek s alusek s edaspidist e k oolitu ste pl aneerim isel. Kriteer ium 12: Persona lip oli itik as o n sät e statud, et tööt ajate a renguv estlu sed viiak se läbi kord aastas. Intervj uu de k äigus se lgus, et osade töötajatega on vestlu sed kord k ahe aast a j ooksul. Au diitori et tepanek on vi ia personalip ol iitik a k ooskõlla te ge lik u e luga. Per sona li k om petentsus nõude id tuleb hinnat a ig a-aastaselt. Te ie v alik on, k as te t eete seda läbi arenguvestl uste või m uul vii si l (näitek s l äbi tulem ustasu stam ise sü steem i). Auditi v aatluse a ll ol nud teenus te osas v ast ab Koeru H oo lde keskus täiel ik ult Equass As surance k riteerium itele, vaad eldud dok umendid j a i ntervjuud ands id k innitu st vastavusest Equas s Assuranc e p õhim õte tele. Epp Sillaste Tallinn, dets em ber 201 5 46 47 EQUASS ASSURANCE APPLICATION ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 1. Short information about the organisation in the nati ve language 215 kohalise multifunktsionaalse asutusena pakub hooldekeskus erinevatele kliendigruppidele järgmisi teenuseid:  täisealiste ööpäevaringne hooldusteenus – 86 kliendile;  Alzheimeri ja dementsuse diagnoosiga klientidele eraldi teenus – 30 kliendile  ööpäevaringne erihooldusteenus – 83 kliendile;  ööpäevaringne erihooldusteenus sügav a liitpuudega isikutele – 15 kliendile;  hooldusravi teenus – 12 voodit (170 ravijuhtu);  koduõendus-hooldusteenus (16 juhtu);  rehabilitatsiooniteenused; ning ajutise hooldamise teenuseid. Suurus ja klientide arv annab võimaluse ja eelise erinevate teenuste pakkumiseks. Meie eesmärgiks elanike eest hoolitsemisel on  edendada isiku lugupidamist, väärikust ja autonoomsust;  arendada tema võimeid, elukvaliteeti ja sotsiaalset integreerumist;  saata inimest ühiskonna elust osavõtmisel. Meie missiooniks on t oetada oma keskuses inimeste sotsiaalset ja tervislikku toimetulekut. 2. Short information about the organisation in English (acti vities, clients, etc.) The Health and Social Care Centre as a multifunctio nal organisation housing 215 people provides the following services for different clientele groups:  around the clock adult care services: 86 clients;  special services for clients diagnosed with Alzheimer and dementia: 30 clients  around the clock special care services: 83 clients;  around the clock services for clients with severe multiple disabilities: 15 clients;  care treatment services: 12 beds (170 treatment cases);  home nursing care services: 16 cases;  rehabilitation services; and temporary care servic es. 1 It is our mission to support people’s ability for social and healthy coping in our centre. 3. Name of the organisation as you w ould w ant it to appear on the EQU ASS Assurance certificate Sihtasutus Koeru Hooldekeskus 4. Name of services / department s of the organisation i n the scope of the application as you w ould w ant it to appear on the EQU ASS Assurance certificate: Ööpäevaringne erihooldusteenus 5. Organisation’s logo Information to be published on EQUASS website: Name of the organi sation : The Foundation of Koeru Health and Social Care Centre Post address: Ida 2, Koeru vald, 73001, Järva maakond, Estonia Director: Mr Rünno Lass Contact person: Mr Rünno Lass Email: rynno.lass@ koeruhk.ee Web: http://w ww.koeruhk.ee 2 Maarika Aro Saatja: Maarika Aro Saatmisaeg: 4. jaanuar 2016. a. 12:54 Adressaat: 'Guus van Beek'; Marie Dubost Koopia: Keiu Talve Teema: Koeru Hooldekeskus audit report Manused: EQ-ASS_AUD_Audit Report-Koeru HK.pdf; EQUASS taotluvorm_SA Koeru Hooldekeskus-1.xlsx; Additional Information Form _SA Koeru Hooldekeskus.docx; Asutuse külastuse ettevalmistuse vorm- Koeru HK.docx Dear Marie, Dear Guus, Attached you’ll find an audit report and other documents of Koeru Hooldekeskus EE2015-028. Please let Keiu to know in case there are some comments about the report. Best, Maarika 1
Allikas: Astangu Kutserehabilitatsiooni Keskus dokumendiregister →
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel