Pöördumine

Questionnaire – Collecting promising practice in independent living / deinstitutionalisation processes Context The Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030 (S trategy) aims to ensure the full participation in society of persons with disabilities, on an equal basis with others, in line with the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, which establish equality and non-discrimination as cornerstones of EU policies. The Strategy supports the implementation of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), to which the EU and all 27 Member States are individual parties. As a flagship action of t he Strategy, the European Commission is preparing guidance recommending to Member States improvements on independent living and inclusion in the community, in order to enable persons with disabilities to live in accessible, supported housing in the community, or to continue living at home (including personal assistance schemes). With t his guidance , the Commission seeks to support the joint commitment of the EU and its Member States towards implementing the right to independent living and inclusion in the community, i n line with article 19 of the UNCRPD . T ak ing a practical approach, the guidance will seek to illustrate examples of Member States ’ experiences in developing the conditions for independent living and carrying out deinstitutionalisation processes, with a particular focus on how EU funds can be used to accelerate progress in these areas. This questionnaire is addressed to public authorities and bodies, at the relevant level of governance (national, regional or local), and to stakeholders in Member States ( e.g. private and public service providers, civil society organisations, organisations representing persons with disabilities ) involved in projects , investments , or the implementation of measures for advancing deinstitutionalisation processes and developing community support for persons with disabilities . While the focus is on the use of EU funds, examples of relevant measures with support from other funding sources are also welcome. Objective : T o c ollect promising /positive practices and measures , or promising elements of a practice, underway in EU Member States that implement the principles for independent living for persons with disabilities and / or advance with deinstitutionalisation processes , in line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) , with a particular focus on how EU funds can be used to support investments that support these processes . To i dentify funding sources, transferability aspects and sustainability of promising projects /interventions , and to u nderstand how positive practice is assessed. To collect promising practice from non-EU countries addressing similar challenges than EU Member States and with transferable elements that can inspire similar interventions in EU Member States. Acknowledging that all EU Member States are on a pathway towards making independent living a reality for all persons with disabilities, some of the examples of practices may illustrate intermediate steps in a transition. it will be important to see them in the context of the national /regional/local plans and strategies to finali s e the transition to independent living in line with UNCRPD . In addition, t he perspective of diverse target groups of persons with disabilities ( e.g. children with disabilities, older persons with disabilities, persons with intellectual disabilities, women/girls with disabilities, etc.) is important and examples of interventions or services targeting their specific needs are welcome . It is important to note that other persons without disabilities, such as children deprived of parental care, might also live in institutions ( e.g. orphanages). While these groups are not the focus of th is guidance on independent living, and not a target group of this exercise, they may benefit from establishing synergies. Use of results : T he examples collected will contribute to deliver the Guidance on independent living, a flagship of the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030, and will help to share experience from national contexts in tackling the challenges and in advancing community living and deinstitutionali s ation processes, notably through the use of EU funds. An i mportant aspect in this exercise is thus to i dentify transferable elements to inspire similar measures in other M ember S tates . We aim also to i dentify upscalable pilot projects showing objective evidence of positive results . Target group - who will use the results? P olicy makers, managing authorit ies , public and private service providers, and organisations representing persons with a disability. Level/scale of intervention : N ational , regional or municipal level, from pilot project to large-scale intervention within broader reform s . In practical terms, practice s will be collected around the relevant areas of the forthcoming guidance , listed below. Under each heading some examples of relevant types of interventions are provided . Themes and examples of types of intervention (examples of interventions provided are not exhaustive) : Developing support and services in the community (including prevention of institutionalisation , inclusive mainstream services and accessible housing and environments ) and transitions to independent living in the community - perspective of different groups: Prevention: early childhood intervention services to prevent the institutionalisation of children with disabilities ; crisis interventions to avoid institutionalisation of persons with disabilities, including e.g. women/girls with disabilities , persons with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities. Support for older person who acquire disabilities to remain living in their homes receiving the services they need. S upport systems and networks : support systems and informal community support structures are composed of peers, family members, friends, neighbours or other trusted persons , like volunteers, who provide the support that a person with disabilities requires for decision-making or daily activities, in order that the person can exercise the right to live independently and to be included in the community. Support systems are key for some persons with disabilities, in particular for persons with intellectual disabilities and persons requiring intensive support, in navigating and determining the support services that they may require. ( e.g. users’ cooperatives ). Supported decision making : support that enables persons with disabilities to exercise their legal capacity in choosing, managing , initiating and terminating the provision of community-based support , and including financial decisions . Support in exercising legal capacity can be provided as a service funded by the State or through the individual’s s upport systems and networks . Individuali s ed community services : personal assistance, home support and care services , including mobile units that support persons with disabilities in their own homes . L iving arrangements : accessible (social) housing; adapted housing (smart homes adapted to respond to needs of people with disabilities, remote monitoring or alert systems etc.), foster care . Accessible and i nclusive mainstream services in the community : inclusive early childhood education and care services for children , other education, employment, social and health care services, ensuring accessibility of infrastructures and services in the community. New models of governance and o rganisation of services around the user ( integrated, person- centered models ) , including taking into account the family. Use of assistive technology and technological aids to support independent living ( e.g. digital services). Alternative funding models and budgets : P ersonal budgets . F inancial support to persons with disabilities and their families , including for housing . Development and capacity building of care, support and services workforce and of responsible administrative levels : R ecruitment and c apacity building for case handlers, personal assistants, care providers, staff involved in deinstitutionalisation processes , or staff delivering community - based services from public authorities, public social services staff, private and third sector service providers. Capacity building for support systems ( training/coaching of famil ies , informal carers, peers, volunteers, advocacy organisations , friends , etc.) . Building capacity on the responsible administrative levels for assessment of needs and selection of providers . S upport for self-sufficiency and empowerment of persons with disabilities . Partnership and consultation: Co-production or participation of persons with disabilities and/or organisations that represent them in the design, implementation and/or monitoring of interventions , including in the development of the new service offer as expert by experience. Consultation with p eer s and family . Innovative elements in national strategies and action plans to operationalize the principles of independent living: Implementing the principle of choice and control over one’s life. Models for individual needs assessment. Improving data ( e.g. on persons with disabilities living in institutions and the situation in which they live , on use of personal assistance schemes , etc. ) and monitoring systems. Outreach to service users : how persons with disabilities and their families are informed about and offered the new service or change of practice . Public a wareness campaigns , changing mindsets for inclusion in the community . P rocess for selecting practices to be included in the guidelines: 1. Identification and selection . Questionnaires will be processed on a rolling basis as received by the European Commission. Based on the relevance and completeness of the answer, the practices will be shortlisted for possible inclusion in the guidance . T he contact point may be contacted to gather further information about the practice by telephone or e-mail. 2 . Consultation . The draft guidance with example s will be shared with the Disability Platform for consultation. 3 . Publication . After consultation, t he European Commission will publish the guideline s . Questions Introductory remarks: Building on your expertise, we are kindly asking you to complete the questionnaire with the requested information for each practice or project example . Please f eel free to send more than one example per country/organisation – in this case, please complete a separate questionnaire for each practice or project example . Please also share the questionnaire with relevant organisations or bodies owning inspiring practice/projects. The questionnaire collects detailed information about interventions/measures to understand their implementation , how they are assessed and to be able to identify transferable elements. In some cases, a follow up exchange, either through phone or email, might be required during the review process to delve deeper into the points highlighted in examples provided. See detailed steps of the process for collecting promising practice under section 3 . Please note that not all boxes may be relevant to all practices, please indicate “non-applicable” where needed. While the geographical focus of the exercise is on EU Member States and implementation of EU-funded programmes, examples from other national contexts with transferable elements to EU countries are also welcome. In case of questions, please contact: [email protected] Please submit the questionnaire by 15th of September 2023 to: [email protected] Contact Information Organisation N ame : Ministry of Social Affairs, Republic of Estonia Department (if applicable): Department of Social Welfare City: Tallinn Country : Estonia E-mail : [email protected] Telephone: 626 9301 Individual contact details Name: Preimann First Name: Elen Job Title: c ounselor Email: [email protected] Telephone: - T ype of organisation : ☒ National/federal government ☐ Regional government ☐ Local /Municipal government ☐ National EU funds m anaging authority ☐ Regional EU funds managing authority ☐ M onitoring body of EU funds ☐ Implementing body of EU funds ☐ Public soc ial service ☐ Not-for-profit social service ☐ Private service provider ☐ Disabled Persons Organisation / Advocacy ☐ Other, please describe: Could the person listed as contact point be contacted by a contractor of DG EMPL for a follow-up interview? ☒ YES ☐ NO Description of the action Name of the intervention in English and in original language Service model of person-centered special care in local government Isikukeskse erihoolekande teenusmudel kohalikus omavalitsuses Service model of person-centered special care in local government Isikukeskse erihoolekande teenusmudel kohalikus omavalitsuses Classification : To which theme and type of intervention does your example of practice belong ? Themes : you may select up to three answers , please rank the themes according to relevance, from 1 – most relevant , to 3 – le a s t relevant. __ 1 __ Innovative elements in national strategies and action plans to operationalize the principles of independent living _ 2 __ Developing support and services in the community (including prevention of institutionalisation and inclusive mainstream services and housing ) and transitions to independent living in the community _ 3__ Alternative funding models and budgets ____ Development and capacity building of care, support and services workforce ____ Support for self-sufficiency of persons with disabilities ____ Partnership and consultation ____ Outreach to service users ____ Public a wareness (changing mindsets and fighting discrimination) ____ Other: Reply Reply Types of intervention : multiple answers are possible, please rank in order of relevance, with 1 – most relevant. If your example of practice i s not in the list below , please add under “other”. ____ Implementing the principle of cho ice and control over one’s life __ 3 _ Models for individual needs assessment ____ Improving data collection/monitoring systems __ 1 _ Prevention of institutionalisation __ 6 _ Personal assistance __ 7 _ Home support , including mobile units ____ Supported decision making ____ Centres for Independent Living , users’ cooperatives ____ Developing s upport systems and networks ( e.g. peer support ) ____ Living arrangements _ 4 __ Inclusive mains tream services in the community _ 2 __ New models of governance and organisation of services around the user ____ Use of assistive technology and technological aids to support independent living _ 5 __ Personal budgets ____ Financial support to persons with disabilities and their families ____ Recruitment and capacity building of workforce for services _ 8 __ Coaching and training of support systems and networks ____ Coaching and training for self-sufficien cy of persons with disabilities ____ Organi s ing the consultation and participation of persons with disabilities and/or organisations that rep resent them ____ Reaching out and accessible i nformation for service users, including d igital solutions ____ Awareness-raising activities targeting the public, persons with disabilities, family members, policymakers and service providers , changing mindsets for inclusion in the community. ____ Other: Reply Reply Target group of the action (it is possible to mark more than one target group) ☐ Children with physical disabilities ☐ Children with intellectual, psychosocial or developmental disabilities ☐ Adults with physical disabilities ☒ Adults with intellectual, psychosocial or developmental disabilities ☐ Women/girls with disabilities ☐ Persons with disabilities who are homeless ☒ Older persons with disabilities Workforce : ☐ Care providers ☐ Case handlers ☐ Social services providers ☐ Personal assistants ☐ Other (please specify) Reply Reply ☒ Family / informal carers ☐ Peer support networks ☐ Other (please specify) Reply Reply Policy framework : Is your example of intervention embedded in a broader national/regional/local policy or action plan? If so, please provide the title of the legal act, policy document, strategy or plan that the intervention implements. ☒ YES ☐ NO If yes, title in English and in national language : Intention to develop a law amending the Social Welfare Act (updating the organization and funding of special welfare services) Sotsiaalhoolekande seaduse muutmise seaduse väljatöötamise kavatsus ( erihoolekandeteenuste korralduse ja rahastuse ajakohastamine ) The implementation plan of the welfare development plan 2016–2023 Heaolu arengukava 2016–2023 rakendusplaan The welfare development plan 2023-2030 Heaolu arengukava 2023–2030 I mplementation program of cohesion policy funds for the period 2021-2027 Ühtekuuluvuspoliitika fondide rakenduskava perioodiks 2021-2027 Strategy "Estonia 2035" Strateegia "Eesti 2035" If yes, title in English and in national language : Intention to develop a law amending the Social Welfare Act (updating the organization and funding of special welfare services) Sotsiaalhoolekande seaduse muutmise seaduse väljatöötamise kavatsus ( erihoolekandeteenuste korralduse ja rahastuse ajakohastamine ) The implementation plan of the welfare development plan 2016–2023 Heaolu arengukava 2016–2023 rakendusplaan The welfare development plan 2023-2030 Heaolu arengukava 2023–2030 I mplementation program of cohesion policy funds for the period 2021-2027 Ühtekuuluvuspoliitika fondide rakenduskava perioodiks 2021-2027 Strategy "Estonia 2035" Strateegia "Eesti 2035" Timeframe : what is the operational timeframe of the example provided – Please indicate the starting and finishing year for the intervention. ESF funded pilot project f rom 2017 until the end of 2025 , then we hope to implement the model in to national law and budget. ESF funded pilot project f rom 2017 until the end of 2025 , then we hope to implement the model in to national law and budget. What is/was the level of implementation of your example of intervention ? ( it is possible to mark more than one answer) ☐ Cross-EU ☒ National ☐ Regional ☒ Local (municipality level) ☐ Other (please specify – e.g. non-EU country ) Reply Reply Funding : Please indicate the financing source(s) for the intervention and related investments , several choices are allowed . Where possible , p lease indicate the name of the relevant fund/programme and what measures were funded (complementarity of funds ) . ☒ EU funds Name of programme/fund and measures financed: The project is financed from ESF funds : 2020 -2027 ’’ conditions for granting support “Access to social protection and long-term care” sub-activity “Testing of an integrated, person-centered and flexible system of special care services ” Name of programme/fund and measures financed: The project is financed from ESF funds : 2020 -2027 ’’ conditions for granting support “Access to social protection and long-term care” sub-activity “Testing of an integrated, person-centered and flexible system of special care services ” ☐ National/federal budget Name of programme/fund and measures financed: Name of programme/fund and measures financed: ☐ Regional programme Name of programme/fund and measures financed: Name of programme/fund and measures financed: ☐ Municipal /Local budget Name of programme/fund and measures financed: Name of programme/fund and measures financed: ☐ Private funding/foundation or other resources Name of programme/fund and measures financed: Name of programme/fund and measures financed: A mount of investment (in EUR) : What is the overall budget of the intervention ? D ifferent options possible , depending on scale and timeframe ( e.g. one - off investment, permanent intervention) ____ _____ per year _ Years 2017-2022 cost was 7 million EUR, for the next EU period (2023-2025) we have allocated approximately 12 million EUR in total . If applicable , amount or share from EU funds (amount in EUR/share in %): Reply Reply Problem description : Please describe the main challenge(s ) in your national /regional/local context , which the practice seeks to address . Use data where available . (100 words) The current system of special care services is service-centric, not people-centric. The service system is fragmented for its users, it is difficult to understand their rights and opportunities. People in need of help are not noticed in time, intervention is carried out too late. Support offered to caretakers is not sufficient, families have a heavy burden of care. Regardless of what services large service providers introduce in the community, if local governments do not participate, the services will not become part of the local support network. Local governments are ready and motivated to develop services for the people of the region, but they currently lack the money, knowledge and manpower to do so. We aim to make the supporting system for adults with intellectual, psychosocial or developmental disabilities more person centered. Also, in order to ensure equal access to services, a financing model for services provided to people with special mental needs in the community must be developed, which would work and be sustainable. The current system of special care services is service-centric, not people-centric. The service system is fragmented for its users, it is difficult to understand their rights and opportunities. People in need of help are not noticed in time, intervention is carried out too late. Support offered to caretakers is not sufficient, families have a heavy burden of care. Regardless of what services large service providers introduce in the community, if local governments do not participate, the services will not become part of the local support network. Local governments are ready and motivated to develop services for the people of the region, but they currently lack the money, knowledge and manpower to do so. We aim to make the supporting system for adults with intellectual, psychosocial or developmental disabilities more person centered. Also, in order to ensure equal access to services, a financing model for services provided to people with special mental needs in the community must be developed, which would work and be sustainable. Summary : Please describe your practice . What elements are particularly promising to advance the right to independent living? In your specific national/regional/local context, wh at is the advantage of the practice compared to the previous situation ? Please refer to the criteria for your assessment , including independent criteria ( e.g. implementing recommendation s from UN , national human rights bodies , or an external evaluation, implementing a recognised model, etc. ), and to the principles for independent living. Use data where available , and please disaggregate by gender if possible. Please include data on number of persons with disabilities supported by the project and also number of persons who were included in the implementation ( e.g. number of personal assistants, or number of persons providing support to persons with disabilities ) . ( 40 0 words ) In the model, the provision of assistance to a person is viewed as one comprehensive service necessary for a person to cope, where all necessary activities for a person are guaranteed, which have been provided so far as various municipal, rehabilitation or special care services. According to the model, the municipality assesses in which areas of life a person needs help (primary support for a person). After the assessment, permanent help and support for the person is organized by one service provider (basic support for the person). If necessary, the person is provided with other supportive or restorative activities necessary for coping (additional support is offered). The purpose of the model is to make comprehensive help available to a person and their caretakers easily and quickly, close to their own home and with the support of the community. We proceed from the principles of deinstitutionalization . W hile special welfare services and social rehabilitation services are currently organized by the state, according to the new model, it is done by the local government. Ensuring the availability of services and managing pooled resources remains the responsibility of the local government. The task of the municipality is to identify the service needs of its region and develop services and/or create a favorable environment for service providers that would ensure the availability of services. According to the new model, the service is formed from the activities that are now part of the special care and social rehabilitation services necessary to support a specific person, i.e. the (additional support) service components. The model has 26 service components covering seven areas of life. In addition, there are activities to support the family and basic support: consistent personal case management, which includes the creation of an action plan and monitoring of its implementation. The case manager who prepares the comprehensive assistance package is an employee of the local government. The maximum amount of the budget per person in need of assistance depends on the level of the support need of the person in need of assistance. As with piloting, so also with implementation, we consider it necessary for local discretion to cover the case management fee. In total , number of persons with disabilities supported by the project , is 1 955 . In the model, the provision of assistance to a person is viewed as one comprehensive service necessary for a person to cope, where all necessary activities for a person are guaranteed, which have been provided so far as various municipal, rehabilitation or special care services. According to the model, the municipality assesses in which areas of life a person needs help (primary support for a person). After the assessment, permanent help and support for the person is organized by one service provider (basic support for the person). If necessary, the person is provided with other supportive or restorative activities necessary for coping (additional support is offered). The purpose of the model is to make comprehensive help available to a person and their caretakers easily and quickly, close to their own home and with the support of the community. We proceed from the principles of deinstitutionalization . W hile special welfare services and social rehabilitation services are currently organized by the state, according to the new model, it is done by the local government. Ensuring the availability of services and managing pooled resources remains the responsibility of the local government. The task of the municipality is to identify the service needs of its region and develop services and/or create a favorable environment for service providers that would ensure the availability of services. According to the new model, the service is formed from the activities that are now part of the special care and social rehabilitation services necessary to support a specific person, i.e. the (additional support) service components. The model has 26 service components covering seven areas of life. In addition, there are activities to support the family and basic support: consistent personal case management, which includes the creation of an action plan and monitoring of its implementation. The case manager who prepares the comprehensive assistance package is an employee of the local government. The maximum amount of the budget per person in need of assistance depends on the level of the support need of the person in need of assistance. As with piloting, so also with implementation, we consider it necessary for local discretion to cover the case management fee. In total , number of persons with disabilities supported by the project , is 1 955 . Stakeholders : w hich of these stakeholders were involved in the development and implementation of the action (it is possible to mark more than one group of stakeholders) ☐ International organisation ☒ National/federal government ☐ Regional government ☒ Local/Municipal government ☐ National EU funds managing authority ☐ Regional EU funds managing authority ☐ Monitoring body of EU funds ☐ Implementing body of EU funds ☐ Public social service ☐ Not-for-profit social service ☒ Private service provider ☒ Disabled Persons Organisation ☐ Other, please specify : In 2017, a prototype of the person- centered model was completed in cooperation between Ministry o f Social Affairs and private joint adventure Trinidad Wiseman. The prototype was developed together with people with special care needs, their relatives, service providers, representative organizations and The Social Insurance Board. In 2017, a prototype of the person- centered model was completed in cooperation between Ministry o f Social Affairs and private joint adventure Trinidad Wiseman. The prototype was developed together with people with special care needs, their relatives, service providers, representative organizations and The Social Insurance Board. Partnership and consultation : if relevant to the action, please describe how were persons with disabilities/organisations representing them involved or consulted in the design, implementation and/or monitoring/supervision of the intervention. ( 2 00 words) Reply Reply Evaluation : was the practice evaluated? ☐ YES, internally ☒ YES, by a body/organisation not affiliated with its implementation ☐ N O , it was not evaluated Outreach : How was the target group inform ed about , and/or offered , the new service or new practice ? ( it is possible to mark more than one reach out channel) ☒ Referrals through public social services ☒ Referrals through NGOs ☒ Referrals through private service providers ☐ Broadcast media (television or radio) ☒ Printed media (newspapers and magazines) ☐ Social media (Twitter, Facebook, Linked-in, Instagram, S napchat, WhatsApp) ☒ Website o r E-mail ☒ C onferences with stakeholders ☐ Other (please add) Reply Reply Awareness raising campaigns : which channels were used to raise awareness and communicate on the new service/practice to the general public and relevant public authorities? ☐ Television ☐ Radio ☒ Newspapers and magazines ☐ Billboards o Brochures/leaflets/items ☐ Social media (Twitter, Facebook, Linked-in, Instagram, Snapchat, WhatsApp) ☒ Website o E-mail ☒ Meetings/conferences with experts/colleagues/stakeholders ☒ Guidelines from authorities to local social services ☐ Scientific publications ☐ Other (please add) Reply Reply What quality standards and monitoring/control mechanisms are put in place, if any? Monthly participant monitoring report s; Twice a year i nterim report on project implementation . Monthly participant monitoring report s; Twice a year i nterim report on project implementation . Saatja: [email protected] Saaja: "SM Info", "Elen Preimann" Teema: Picture request - independent living practice (EE) Kuupäev: 2024-08-08 14:47 Dear Sir/Madam, Thank you very much for providing an example of a promising practice to support independent living for persons with disabilities, responding to our call for promising practice for the Commission Guidance last year. We are now shortlisting the practices to feature in the brochure with examples accompanying the Guidance, and on this occasion, we would like to kindly enquire if you could help us obtain one or two pictures or illustrations from the practice submitted “Service model of person-centred special care in local government” (questionnaire attached for easier reference), that we can use in the publication for a more qualitative presentation? To this end, and in line with the regulations on copy rights and data protection, please find attached: * 2 forms for the transfer of copyright for the use of the images, in Estonian and in English, as preferred. * 2 forms for authorisation in case people are included in the photos (same languages as above). Technical aspects for the pictures: * The resolution of the images should be at least 300 d.p.i. (dots per inch) * It is preferred to provide bigger photos than smaller ones, to ensure good quality in case resizing is needed for the layout of the document. * Page-size photos should be in portrait-format. We would be very grateful to receive the images and filled-in forms (in the preferred language) by September 4 to the functional mailbox of the Unit ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ), where you can also address any questions you might have. Please note that at this stage we are not able to guarantee the inclusion of the practices in the brochure. Thank you very much in advance, 2019300 -368300 0 0 Litsentsileping Nimi : Aadress: keda esindab käesolevale lepingule alla kirjutama volitatud esindajana [hr/pr] [nimi, ameti-/kutsenimetus], edaspidi „ litsentsiandja “, ühelt poolt ning Euroopa Liit, keda esindab Euroopa Komisjon, asukohaga 200, Rue de la Loi, 1049 Brüssel, Belgia (edaspidi „ litsentsisaaja “), teiselt poolt, edaspidi koos „lepinguosalised“. Arvestades et litsentsiandja on allpool kirjeldatud teose (edaspidi „teos“) omanik või tal on seaduslik õigus anda käesolev litsents selle kasutamiseks, lepivad pooled kokku järgmises: Joonise/illustratsiooni/pildi pealkiri ja lühikirjeldus Autori(te)/fotograafi(de) nimi/nimed: Teose loomise aasta(d) Litsentsiandja annab litsentsisaajale teose kasutamiseks litsentsitasuta, üleandmis- ja all-litsentsimisõigusega ülemaailmse lihtlitsentsi. Teose kasutamise õigus hõlmab peamiselt õigust teost taasesitada, salvestada, jagada, muuta, avaldada, kuvada, avalikustada, luua tuletatud teoseid, levitada, üldsusele edastada või muul viisil üldsusele kättesaadavaks teha mis tahes vormis, andmekandjal ja keeles, sealhulgas Euroopa Liidu veebisaitidel ja ametlikes sotsiaalmeediakanalites või kolmandate isikute veebis aitidel ja televisioonis. Kahtluste vältimiseks on litsentsisaajal lubatud: lisada teosele heli või uusi elemente (lõike, pealkirju, juhtlõike, esiletõsteid, legende, sisukordi, kokkuvõtteid, illustratsioone ja subtiitreid kõigis ELi ametlikes keeltes), koostada teost sisaldavaid esitlusi, animatsioone, piktogramme ja slaidiesitlusi, teha teosest väljavõtteid või jagada see osadeks, arhiveerida teos või lisada see Euroopa Komisjoni andmebaasidesse, sealhulgas üldsusele tasuta kättesaadavatesse elektroonilistesse andmebaasidesse, ning kasutada seda mis tahes muul eesmärgil, mis on vajalik Euroopa Liidu ülesannete täitmiseks. Litsentsisaaja võib lubada oma töötajatel või alltöövõtjatel enda nimel kasutada eespool nimetatud õigusi, mille litsentsiandja on talle andnud. Ei kohaldata . Litsents antakse kogu autoriõiguse ja vajaduse korral sellega kaasnevate õiguste kehtivusajaks. Kõik teosega seotud autoriõigused ja muud intellektuaalomandiõigused jäävad litsentsiandja omandiks ja litsentsisaaja ei omanda nende suhtes mingeid omandiõigusi. Tuletatud teosed hõlmavad litsentsisaaja või tema alltöövõtjate loodud originaalteoseid, mille loomisel on teost kasutatud. Ilma et see piiraks eelöeldut, kuuluvad tuletatud teosed litsentsisaajale. Litsentsisaajale antud õiguste teostamise korral peab litsentsisaaja viitama litsentsiandjale ja teose autorile järgmise märkega: [Litsentsiandja autoriõiguse märge – näide: © Litsentsiandja, aasta] Ei kohaldata . Litsentsiandja tagab, et tal on kõik vajalikud load, et litsentsida eespool nimetatud õigusi, ning kinnitab, et ta on saanud autoriõiguse ja sellega kaasnevate õiguste ning teosega seotud muude intellektuaalomandiõiguste omanikelt nõuetekohased load, ning vajaduse korral teosel kujutatud isikute kirjaliku loa. Litsentsiandja kinnitab, et käesoleva lepinguga litsentsisaajale litsentsitud intellektuaalomandiõiguste kasutamine ei kahjusta kolmandate isikute õigusi ei nüüd ega edaspidi. Muu hulgas kinnitab litsentsiandja eelkõige, et teos ei kahjusta kolmandate isikute autoriõigusi ega sellega kaasnevaid õigusi või kujutise kasutusõigusi. Litsentsiandja kohustub litsentsisaajale hüvitama tekkiva kahju, kaitsma teda nõuete, nõudmiste ja hagide eest, vabastama ta nendega seotud vastutusest ning korvama kulud, sealhulgas õigusabikulud, mis on seotud käesoleva lepingu kohaselt litsentsitud intellektuaalomandiõiguste kasutamisest tulenevaid kohustusi käsitlevate kohtuotsuste ja -menetlustega (st juhul, kui kolmas isik esitab Euroopa Komisjonile teose kasutamise eest nõudeid). Käesolevaga annab litsentsiandja nõusoleku isikuandmete töötlemiseks ulatuses, mis on vajalik eespool kirjeldatud eesmärkide saavutamiseks. Litsentsisaaja tagab, et isikuandmeid töödeldakse määruses (EL) 2018/1725 sätestatud eeskirjade kohaselt. Litsentsisaaja võib andmeid arhiveerida. Andmesubjektina on litsentsiandjal õigus tutvuda oma isikuandmetega, saada teavet andmetöötluse toimumise ja ulatuse kohta ning parandada ebaõigeid isikuandmeid. Nende õiguste kasutamiseks võib litsentsiandja võtta ühendust: [lisada isiku andmed, kellele sellised taotlused tuleb esitada] Käesoleva lepinguga antud õiguste kasutamist reguleeritakse ja seda tõlgendatakse kooskõlas Euroopa Liidu õigusega, mida vajaduse korral täiendab Belgia materiaalõigus. Kui litsentsiandja ja litsentsisaaja vahel ei suudeta käesolevast lepingust tulenevaid või sellega seotud vaidlusi, erimeelsusi või nõudeid rahumeelselt lahendada, esitatakse need lahendamiseks Brüsselis asuvale kohtule. Litsentsiandja nimel Koht ja kuupäev: Allkiri: [Hr/Pr] [Nimi] [Vajaduse korral ametikoht/-nimetus]