dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
Otsing›Sotsiaalministeerium
Muu lepingAvalik

Grandileping

Sotsiaalministeerium · 6. august 2024
Viit
2-2.1/2474-1
Registreeritud
6. august 2024
Dokumendi liik
Muu leping
Funktsioon
2 Välisabi ja struktuuritoetuste rakendamine
Sari
2-2.1 Välisabi vahenditest rahastatavate projektide lepingud koos aktidega
Toimik
2-2.1
Vastutaja
Minni Timberg (Sotsiaalministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Terviseala asekantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Vaimse tervise osakond)

Failid

  • 📎2-2.12474-1 06.08.2024 Muu leping.asice10257 KB

Sisu (failidest)

Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 EUROPEAN HEALTH AND DIGITAL EXECUTIVE AGENCY (HADEA) Director GRANT AGREEMENT Project 101162928 — MENTOR PREAMBLE This Agreement (‘the Agreement’) is between the following parties: on the one part, the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HADEA) (‘EU executive agency’ or ‘granting authority’), under the powers delegated by the European Commission (‘European Commission’), and on the other part, 1. ‘the coordinator’: VALSTS SIA RIGAS PSIHIATRIJAS UN NARKOLOGIJAS CENTRS (RPNC), PIC 881163036, established in TVAIKA STR 2, RIGA 1005, Latvia, and the following other beneficiaries, if they sign their ‘accession form’ (see Annex 3 and Article 40): 2. ORGANISMOS KRATIKON YPIRESION YGEIAS (SHSO-MHS), PIC 891074787, established in PRODROMOU 1 AND CHILONOS 17, NICOSIA 1448, Cyprus, 3. REGION SYDDANMARK (RSD), PIC 999602073, established in DAMHAVEN 12, VEJLE 7100, Denmark, 4. SOTSIAALMINISTEERIUM (MOSA), PIC 998429731, established in Suur-Ameerika 1, TALLINN 10122, Estonia, 5. TERVEYDEN JA HYVINVOINNIN LAITOS (THL), PIC 996697893, established in MANNERHEIMINTIE 166, HELSINKI 00271, Finland, 6. MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA PREVENTION (FR-MOH), PIC 998887377, established in AVENUE DUQUESNE 14, PARIS CEDEX 75350, France, 7. BUNDESZENTRALE FUR GESUNDHEITLICHE AUFKLARUNG (BzGA), PIC 998190723, established in MAARWEG 149-161, KOLN 50825, Germany, 8. NEMZETI NEPEGESZSEGUGYI ES GYOGYSZERESZETI KOZPONT (NNGYK), PIC 998706957, established in ALBERT FLORIAN UT 2-6, BUDAPEST 1097, Hungary, 1 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 9. LANDLAEKNIS EMBAETTID (DOHI), PIC 955430213, established in KATRINARTUNI 2, REYKJAVIK 105, Iceland, 10. ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA (ISS), PIC 999978821, established in Viale Regina Elena 299, ROMA 00161, Italy, 11. LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SVEIKATOS APSAUGOS MINISTERIJA (SAM LT), PIC 933839468, established in VILNIAUS G 33, VILNIUS LT 01506, Lithuania, 12. RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID EN MILIEU (RIVM), PIC 999991431, established in Antonie Van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9, BILTHOVEN 3721 MA, Netherlands, 13. FOLKEHELSEINSTITUTTET (NIPH), PIC 999478883, established in LOVISENBERGGATA 8, OSLO 0456, Norway, 14. NARODOWY FUNDUSZ ZDROWIA (NHF), PIC 998161332, established in UL.RAKOWIECKA 26/30, WARSZAWA 02-528, Poland, 15. CENTRUL NATIONAL DE SANATATE MINTALA SI LUPTA ANTODROG (NCMHFAD), PIC 933059685, established in PITAR MOS 7 15 SECTOR 1, BUCURESTI 010451, Romania, 16. NACIONALNI INSTITUT ZA JAVNO ZDRAVJE (NIJZ), PIC 948891346, established in TRUBARJEVA CESTA 2, LJUBLJANA 1000, Slovenia, 17. ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD- BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK), PIC 955006420, established in RONDA DE AZKUE 1 TORRE DEL BILBAO EXHIBITION CENTRE, BARAKALDO 48902, Spain, 18. FOLKHALSOMYNDIGHETEN (PHAS), PIC 949789954, established in NOBELS VAG 18, SOLNA 171 82, Sweden, 19. STATE INSTITUTION PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE (PHC), PIC 906650465, established in 41 YAROSLAVSKA STR, KYIV 04071, Ukraine, Unless otherwise specified, references to ‘beneficiary’ or ‘beneficiaries’ include the coordinator and affiliated entities (if any). If only one beneficiary signs the grant agreement (‘mono-beneficiary grant’), all provisions referring to the ‘coordinator’ or the ‘beneficiaries’ will be considered — mutatis mutandis — as referring to the beneficiary. The parties referred to above have agreed to enter into the Agreement. By signing the Agreement and the accession forms, the beneficiaries accept the grant and agree to implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with the Agreement, with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. 2 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The Agreement is composed of: Preamble Terms and Conditions (including Data Sheet) Annex 1 Description of the action1 Annex 2 Estimated budget for the action Annex 2a Additional information on unit costs and contributions (if applicable) Annex 3 Accession forms (if applicable)2 Annex 3a Declaration on joint and several liability of affiliated entities (if applicable)3 Annex 4 Model for the financial statements Annex 5 Specific rules (if applicable) 1 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 2 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 3 Template published on Portal Reference Documents. 3 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 TERMS AND CONDITIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS GRANT AGREEMENT.................................................................................................................................................... 1 PREAMBLE........................................................................................................................................................................1 TERMS AND CONDITIONS...........................................................................................................................................4 DATASHEET...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL..............................................................................................................................................16 ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT ..................................................................................... 16 ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS........................................................................................................................16 CHAPTER 2 ACTION................................................................................................................................................. 17 ARTICLE 3 — ACTION................................................................................................................................. 17 ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE...................................................................................17 CHAPTER 3 GRANT...................................................................................................................................................17 ARTICLE 5 — GRANT...................................................................................................................................17 5.1 Form of grant......................................................................................................................................17 5.2 Maximum grant amount..................................................................................................................... 18 5.3 Funding rate........................................................................................................................................18 5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding.............................................................. 18 5.5 Budget flexibility................................................................................................................................18 ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS......................................19 6.1 General eligibility conditions............................................................................................................. 19 6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category................................................................... 20 6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions...................................................................................................... 24 6.4 Consequences of non-compliance...................................................................................................... 25 CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................................................ 25 SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS........................................................................................................................................ 25 ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES................................................................................................................... 25 ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES....................................................................................................... 27 ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION................................................... 29 9.1 Associated partners.............................................................................................................................29 9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action.................................................................... 30 9.3 Subcontractors.....................................................................................................................................30 4 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties..................................................................................30 ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS....................................................................... 30 10.1 Non-EU participants......................................................................................................................... 30 10.2 Participants which are international organisations...........................................................................31 10.3 Pillar-assessed participants............................................................................................................... 31 SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION...........................................................................33 ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION............................................................ 33 11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action................................................................................... 34 11.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 34 ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS.............................................................................................. 34 12.1 Conflict of interests.......................................................................................................................... 34 12.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 34 ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY............................................................................ 34 13.1 Sensitive information........................................................................................................................34 13.2 Classified information...................................................................................................................... 35 13.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 35 ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES...................................................................................................... 35 14.1 Ethics.................................................................................................................................................35 14.2 Values................................................................................................................................................ 36 14.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 36 ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION.......................................................................................................... 36 15.1 Data processing by the granting authority....................................................................................... 36 15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries............................................................................................... 36 15.3 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 37 ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS — ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE................................................................................ 37 16.1 Background and access rights to background..................................................................................37 16.2 Ownership of results.........................................................................................................................37 16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes...................................37 16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background................................................................................ 38 16.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 39 ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY............................................ 39 17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action........................................................... 39 17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement......................................................................... 39 17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer..............................................................................................40 5 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules............................................................40 17.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 40 ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION............................................... 40 18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action........................................................................................ 40 18.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 40 SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION......................................................................................................... 40 ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS.................................................................... 40 19.1 Information requests......................................................................................................................... 40 19.2 Participant Register data updates..................................................................................................... 41 19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action............................................41 19.4 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 41 ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING............................................................................................................ 41 20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents.................................................................................... 41 20.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 42 ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING........................................................................................................................ 43 21.1 Continuous reporting........................................................................................................................ 43 21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements....................................................... 43 21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros..........................................................44 21.4 Reporting language...........................................................................................................................44 21.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 44 ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE................. 44 22.1 Payments and payment arrangements.............................................................................................. 44 22.2 Recoveries.........................................................................................................................................45 22.3 Amounts due.....................................................................................................................................45 22.4 Enforced recovery.............................................................................................................................50 22.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 51 ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES....................................................................................................................51 23.1 Prefinancing guarantee..................................................................................................................... 51 23.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 52 ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES................................................................................................................... 52 24.1 Operational verification report (OVR).............................................................................................52 24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS).................................................................................. 52 24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC).................................. 52 24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA).....................................................................................................53 24.5 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 53 6 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS..................................................................................................................................... 53 25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits................................................................................ 53 25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities..............54 25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding.......................................................... 55 25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations........................................................................... 55 25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations.................................................................................................................... 55 25.6 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 56 ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS................................................................................................... 57 26.1 Impact evaluation............................................................................................................................. 57 26.2 Consequences of non-compliance.................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE.................................................................................. 57 SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION.................................................................................57 ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS...........................................................57 27.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 57 27.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 57 27.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 57 ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION........................................................................................................ 58 28.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 58 28.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 58 28.3 Effects............................................................................................................................................... 58 SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION............................................................................................58 ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION............................................................................. 58 29.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 58 29.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 59 ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION...................................................................................................59 30.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 59 30.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 60 ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION..............................................................................60 31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension............................................................................................. 60 31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension.............................................................................................................61 ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION......................................... 62 32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination............................................................................................ 62 32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination................................................................................ 63 32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination.................................................................................... 64 7 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS............... 67 ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES...........................................................................................................................67 33.1 Liability of the granting authority....................................................................................................67 33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries............................................................................................................ 68 ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES....................................... 68 SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE.......................................................................................................................... 68 ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE.............................................................................................................. 68 CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS...........................................................................................................................68 ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES...............................................................68 36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management................................................... 68 36.2 Date of communication.................................................................................................................... 69 36.3 Addresses for communication.......................................................................................................... 69 ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT.....................................................................69 ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES..........................................................70 ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS.................................................................................................................. 70 39.1 Conditions......................................................................................................................................... 70 39.2 Procedure.......................................................................................................................................... 70 ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES........................................... 71 40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble............................................................. 71 40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries.......................................................................................................... 71 ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT................................................................................. 71 ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY.................................................................................................................................71 ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES.............................................. 72 43.1 Applicable law..................................................................................................................................72 43.2 Dispute settlement............................................................................................................................ 72 ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE.........................................................................................................72 8 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 DATA SHEET 1. General data Project summary: Project summary Following the EU Communication on a Comprehensive Approach to mental health, MENTOR contributes to reduce the burden of mental ill-health and promote good mental health and well-being, planning activities addressed both to the general population and to people suffering from mental issues to have an impact at the policy and practice level in Europe in several ways. Thus, MENTOR aims at promoting mental health by sharing experiences from the political to the clinical professional sphere, incorporating evidence-based best practices and adapting initiatives to achieve long-term sustainability of promoting mental health and well-being both at personal and population level. MENTOR works at addressing needs like equitable access to care for people with mental health conditions, reduction of stigma, recovery and inclusion by implementing shared guidelines for consideration of mental health in all policies, identifying evidence- based guidelines for promotion and prevention interventions targeted to young people and vulnerable groups in general population, supporting recovery-oriented and inclusive practice in the care of people with a mental health condition, and implementing personalized and comprehensive approaches to mental health. MENTOR will deliver specific activities focused on people in need (displaced citizens from Ukraine, PLE, youths with adverse living conditions), for instance developing the methodologic frame and standard for inclusive mental health policy and then creating best practise examples in different communities, the activities is planned to be wide spectrum from seminars and lectures which are taking place in real life setting in community to PLE training groups and digital solutions. In response to the urgent need to validate ethical, effective, safe, sustainable, trustworthy digital tools, MENTORS aims to endorse a set of standards for monitoring mental health and wellbeing and implement preventative and promotion actions by digital solutions. MENTOR is fully aligned with and complements public health strategies as well as other on-going investments and capacity building initiatives. Planned activities have potential to exert a substantial impact and results are efficiency oriented on several key mental health issues across member states and should attract interest from many countries as mental health is a priority in global action scope. Keywords: – Mental health, promotion and prevention, mental health in all policies, people with lived experience, social inclusion, tackling stigma and discrimination, digital tools, web-based solutions Project number: 101162928 Project name: Mental Health Together Project acronym: MENTOR Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Topic: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA-04 Type of action: EU4H Project Grants Granting authority: European Health and Digital Executive Agency Grant managed through EU Funding & Tenders Portal: Yes (eGrants) Project starting date: fixed date: 1 September 2024 Project end date: 31 August 2027 Project duration: 36 months Consortium agreement: Yes 2. Participants List of participants: Total Max grant N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC eligible costs amount (BEN and AE) 1 COO RPNC VALSTS SIA RIGAS PSIHIATRIJAS UN LV 881163036 780 396.10 624 316.87 NARKOLOGIJAS CENTRS 9 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Total Max grant N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC eligible costs amount (BEN and AE) 2 BEN SHSO-MHS ORGANISMOS KRATIKON YPIRESION YGEIAS CY 891074787 240 628.45 192 502.75 3 BEN RSD REGION SYDDANMARK DK 999602073 77 363.14 61 890.50 4 BEN MOSA SOTSIAALMINISTEERIUM EE 998429731 125 093.70 100 074.95 5 BEN THL TERVEYDEN JA HYVINVOINNIN LAITOS FI 996697893 222 264.47 177 811.56 6 BEN FR-MOH MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA PREVENTION FR 998887377 112 767.30 90 213.83 7 BEN BzGA BUNDESZENTRALE FUR GESUNDHEITLICHE DE 998190723 312 081.50 249 665.19 AUFKLARUNG 7.1 AE ULEI UNIVERSITAET LEIPZIG DE 999854564 86 061.17 68 848.93 7.2 AE SB FREIE HANSESTADT BREMEN DE 998928796 193 773.96 155 019.16 8 BEN NNGYK NEMZETI NEPEGESZSEGUGYI ES HU 998706957 86 237.72 68 990.17 GYOGYSZERESZETI KOZPONT 8.1 AE OKFŐ ORSZAGOS KORHAZI FOIGAZGATOSAG HU 891516331 625 750.98 500 600.77 8.2 AE BCH MAGYARORSZAGI REFORMATUS EGYHAZ HU 918286488 97 992.74 78 394.18 BETHESDA GYERMEKKORHAZA 9 BEN DOHI LANDLAEKNIS EMBAETTID IS 955430213 627 810.73 502 248.57 9.1 AE PHCI HEILSUGAESLA HOFUDBORGARSVAEDISINS IS 917819724 78 794.27 63 035.40 9.2 AE NUHI LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IS 999821390 35 367.78 28 294.21 10 BEN ISS ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA IT 999978821 707 265.08 565 812.05 10.1 AE PROMIS AZIENDA ULSS 4 VENETO ORIENTALE IT 953342870 106 867.32 85 493.85 10.2 AE ASL TORINO AZIENDA SANITARIA LOCALE CITTA DI TORINO IT 899690036 15 344.87 12 275.89 10.3 AE UniMiBI UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA IT 999923531 21 397.86 17 118.28 11 BEN SAM LT LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SVEIKATOS APSAUGOS LT 933839468 45 828.10 36 662.47 MINISTERIJA 12 BEN RIVM RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID EN NL 999991431 194 033.86 155 227.08 MILIEU 12.1 AE TRIMBOS STICHTING TRIMBOS- INSTITUUT, NETHERLANDS NL 998923073 85 887.26 68 709.80 INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION 13 BEN NIPH FOLKEHELSEINSTITUTTET NO 999478883 660 343.01 528 274.39 13.1 AE SSB STATISTISK SENTRALBYRAA NO 999456379 150 000.00 119 999.99 14 BEN NHF NARODOWY FUNDUSZ ZDROWIA PL 998161332 388 063.32 310 450.65 15 BEN NCMHFAD CENTRUL NATIONAL DE SANATATE MINTALA SI RO 933059685 99 242.77 79 394.20 LUPTA ANTODROG 16 BEN NIJZ NACIONALNI INSTITUT ZA JAVNO ZDRAVJE SI 948891346 386 031.86 308 825.48 17 BEN BIOSISTEMAK ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN ES 955006420 202 364.82 161 891.85 SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK 17.1 AE GENCAT DEPARTAMENT DE SALUT - GENERALITAT DE ES 999826919 45 406.10 36 324.87 CATALUNYA 17.2 AE FRCB-IDIBAPS FUNDACIO DE RECERCA CLINIC BARCELONA- ES 999477525 38 127.95 30 502.35 INSTITUT D INVESTIGACIONS BIOMEDIQUES AUGUST PI I SUNYER 17.3 AE ICO INSTITUT CATALA D'ONCOLOGIA ES 998420031 27 541.80 22 033.43 17.4 AE IDIVAL FUNDACION INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION ES 946556944 44 586.90 35 669.51 MARQUES DE VALDECILLA 17.5 AE FFIS FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E ES 962632463 89 154.11 71 323.28 INVESTIGACION SANITARIAS DE LA REGION DE MURCIA 17.6 AE SMS SERVICIO MURCIANO DE SALUD ES 934953804 59 489.33 47 591.45 17.7 AE SAS SERVICIO ANDALUZ DE SALUD ES 998853621 75 691.80 60 553.43 17.8 AE FUNDESALUD FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E ES 932288729 31 549.25 25 239.38 INVESTIGACION DE LOS PROFESIONALES DE LASALUD DE EXTREMADURA FUNDESALUD 10 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Total Max grant N° Role Short name Legal name Ctry PIC eligible costs amount (BEN and AE) 18 BEN PHAS FOLKHALSOMYNDIGHETEN SE 949789954 169 204.45 135 363.55 19 BEN PHC STATE INSTITUTION PUBLIC HEALTH CENTER OF UA 906650465 154 115.21 123 292.15 THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE 20 AP DISA MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA SECURITE LU 998888153 0.00 0.00 SOCIALE 21 AP MHB MEDIZINISCHE HOCHSCHULE BRANDENBURG DE 898913260 0.00 0.00 CAMPUS GMBH 22 AP LOMBARDIA REGIONE LOMBARDIA IT 999654065 0.00 0.00 23 AP HDIR HELSEDIREKTORATET NO 974772304 0.00 0.00 24 AP SES SERVICIO EXTREMENO DE SALUD ES 893253116 0.00 0.00 Total 7 499 921.04 5 999 936.42 Coordinator: – VALSTS SIA RIGAS PSIHIATRIJAS UN NARKOLOGIJAS CENTRS (RPNC) 3. Grant Maximum grant amount, total estimated eligible costs and contributions and funding rate: Total eligible costs Funding rate Maximum grant amount Maximum grant amount (BEN and AE) (%) (Annex 2) (award decision) 7 499 921.04 80 5 999 936.42 5 999 936.42 Grant form: Budget-based Grant mode: Action grant Budget categories/activity types: - A. Personnel costs - A.1 Employees, A.2 Natural persons under direct contract, A.3 Seconded persons - A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries - B. Subcontracting costs - C. Purchase costs - C.1 Travel and subsistence - C.2 Equipment - C.3 Other goods, works and services - D. Other cost categories - D.1 Financial support to third parties - E. Indirect costs Cost eligibility options: - Standard supplementary payments - Limitation for subcontracting - Travel and subsistence: - Travel: Unit or Actual costs 11 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - Accommodation: Unit or Actual costs - Subsistence: Unit or Actual costs - Equipment: depreciation only - Costs for providing financial support to third parties (actual cost; max amount for each recipient: EUR 0.00) - Indirect cost flat-rate: 7% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs and exempted specific cost categories, if any) - VAT: Yes - Other ineligible costs Budget flexibility: Yes (no flexibility cap) 4. Reporting, payments and recoveries 4.1 Continuous reporting (art 21) Deliverables: see Funding & Tenders Portal Continuous Reporting tool 4.2 Periodic reporting and payments Reporting and payment schedule (art 21, 22): Reporting Payments Deadline Reporting periods Type Deadline Type (time to pay) RP No Month from Month to 30 days from entry into force/10 days before starting date/ Initial prefinancing financial guarantee (if required) – whichever is the latest 1 1 18 Periodic report 60 days after end Interim payment 90 days from of reporting period receiving periodic report 2 19 36 Periodic report 60 days after end Final payment 90 days from of reporting period receiving periodic report Prefinancing payments and guarantees: Prefinancing payment Prefinancing guarantee Guarantee Type Amount Division per participant amount Prefinancing 1 (initial) 2 999 968.21 n/a 1 - RPNC n/a 2 - SHSO-MHS n/a 3 - RSD n/a 4 - MOSA n/a 5 - THL n/a 6 - FR-MOH n/a 7 - BzGA n/a 7.1 - ULEI n/a 12 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Prefinancing payment Prefinancing guarantee Guarantee Type Amount Division per participant amount 7.2 - SB n/a 8 - NNGYK n/a 8.1 - OKFŐ n/a 8.2 - BCH n/a 9 - DOHI n/a 9.1 - PHCI n/a 9.2 - NUHI n/a 10 - ISS n/a 10.1 - PROMIS n/a 10.2 - ASL TORINO n/a 10.3 - UniMiBI n/a 11 - SAM LT n/a 12 - RIVM n/a 12.1 - TRIMBOS n/a 13 - NIPH n/a 13.1 - SSB n/a 14 - NHF n/a 15 - NCMHFAD n/a 16 - NIJZ n/a 17 - BIOSISTEMAK n/a 17.1 - GENCAT n/a 17.2 - FRCB-IDIBAPS n/a 17.3 - ICO n/a 17.4 - IDIVAL n/a 17.5 - FFIS n/a 17.6 - SMS n/a 17.7 - SAS n/a 17.8 - FUNDESALUD n/a 18 - PHAS n/a 19 - PHC n/a Reporting and payment modalities (art 21, 22): Mutual Insurance Mechanism (MIM): No Restrictions on distribution of initial prefinancing: The prefinancing may be distributed only if the minimum number of beneficiaries set out in the call condititions (if any) have acceded to the Agreement and only to beneficiaries that have acceded. Interim payment ceiling (if any): 90% of the maximum grant amount No-profit rule: Yes Late payment interest: ECB + 3.5% Bank account for payments: 13 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 LV18UNLA0055004224125 Conversion into euros: Double conversion Reporting language: Language of the Agreement 4.3 Certificates (art 24): Certificates on the financial statements (CFS): Conditions: Schedule: interim/final payment, if threshold is reached Standard threshold (beneficiary-level): - financial statement: requested EU contribution to costs ≥ EUR 325 000.00 4.4 Recoveries (art 22) First-line liability for recoveries: Beneficiary termination: Beneficiary concerned Final payment: Coordinator After final payment: Beneficiary concerned Joint and several liability for enforced recoveries (in case of non-payment): Limited joint and several liability of other beneficiaries — up to the maximum grant amount of the beneficiary Joint and several liability of affiliated entities — n/a 5. Consequences of non-compliance, applicable law & dispute settlement forum Applicable law (art 43): Standard applicable law regime: EU law + law of Belgium Dispute settlement forum (art 43): Standard dispute settlement forum: EU beneficiaries: EU General Court + EU Court of Justice (on appeal) Non-EU beneficiaries: Courts of Brussels, Belgium (unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements) 6. Other Specific rules (Annex 5): Yes Standard time-limits after project end: Confidentiality (for X years after final payment): 5 Record-keeping (for X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) Reviews (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) 14 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Audits (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) Extension of findings from other grants to this grant (no later than X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) Impact evaluation (up to X years after final payment): 5 (or 3 for grants of not more than EUR 60 000) 15 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 CHAPTER 1 GENERAL ARTICLE 1 — SUBJECT OF THE AGREEMENT This Agreement sets out the rights and obligations and terms and conditions applicable to the grant awarded for the implementation of the action set out in Chapter 2. ARTICLE 2 — DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions apply: Actions — The project which is being funded in the context of this Agreement. Grant — The grant awarded in the context of this Agreement. EU grants — Grants awarded by EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies (including EU executive agencies, EU regulatory agencies, EDA, joint undertakings, etc.). Participants — Entities participating in the action as beneficiaries, affiliated entities, associated partners, third parties giving in-kind contributions, subcontractors or recipients of financial support to third parties. Beneficiaries (BEN) — The signatories of this Agreement (either directly or through an accession form). Affiliated entities (AE) — Entities affiliated to a beneficiary within the meaning of Article 187 of EU Financial Regulation 2018/10464 which participate in the action with similar rights and obligations as the beneficiaries (obligation to implement action tasks and right to charge costs and claim contributions). Associated partners (AP) — Entities which participate in the action, but without the right to charge costs or claim contributions. Purchases — Contracts for goods, works or services needed to carry out the action (e.g. equipment, consumables and supplies) but which are not part of the action tasks (see Annex 1). Subcontracting — Contracts for goods, works or services that are part of the action tasks (see Annex 1). In-kind contributions — In-kind contributions within the meaning of Article 2(36) of EU Financial 4 For the definition, see Article 187 Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (‘EU Financial Regulation’) (OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1): “affiliated entities [are]: (a) entities that form a sole beneficiary [(i.e. where an entity is formed of several entities that satisfy the criteria for being awarded a grant, including where the entity is specifically established for the purpose of implementing an action to be financed by a grant)]; (b) entities that satisfy the eligibility criteria and that do not fall within one of the situations referred to in Article 136(1) and 141(1) and that have a link with the beneficiary, in particular a legal or capital link, which is neither limited to the action nor established for the sole purpose of its implementation”. 16 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Regulation 2018/1046, i.e. non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties. Fraud — Fraud within the meaning of Article 3 of EU Directive 2017/13715 and Article 1 of the Convention on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, drawn up by the Council Act of 26 July 19956, as well as any other wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain. Irregularities — Any type of breach (regulatory or contractual) which could impact the EU financial interests, including irregularities within the meaning of Article 1(2) of EU Regulation 2988/957. Grave professional misconduct — Any type of unacceptable or improper behaviour in exercising one’s profession, especially by employees, including grave professional misconduct within the meaning of Article 136(1)(c) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. Applicable EU, international and national law — Any legal acts or other (binding or non-binding) rules and guidance in the area concerned. Portal — EU Funding & Tenders Portal; electronic portal and exchange system managed by the European Commission and used by itself and other EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies for the management of their funding programmes (grants, procurements, prizes, etc.). CHAPTER 2 ACTION ARTICLE 3 — ACTION The grant is awarded for the action 101162928 — MENTOR (‘action’), as described in Annex 1. ARTICLE 4 — DURATION AND STARTING DATE The duration and the starting date of the action are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 1). CHAPTER 3 GRANT ARTICLE 5 — GRANT 5.1 Form of grant The grant is an action grant8 which takes the form of a budget-based mixed actual cost grant (i.e. a 5 Directive (EU) 2017/1371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2017 on the fight against fraud to the Union’s financial interests by means of criminal law (OJ L 198, 28.7.2017, p. 29). 6 OJ C 316, 27.11.1995, p. 48. 7 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 8 For the definition, see Article 180(2)(a) EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: ‘action grant’ means an EU grant to finance “an action intended to help achieve a Union policy objective”. 17 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 grant based on actual costs incurred, but which may also include other forms of funding, such as unit costs or contributions, flat-rate costs or contributions, lump sum costs or contributions or financing not linked to costs). 5.2 Maximum grant amount The maximum grant amount is set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 3) and in the estimated budget (Annex 2). 5.3 Funding rate The funding rate for costs is 80% of the action’s eligible costs. Contributions are not subject to any funding rate. 5.4 Estimated budget, budget categories and forms of funding The estimated budget for the action is set out in Annex 2. It contains the estimated eligible costs and contributions for the action, broken down by participant and budget category. Annex 2 also shows the types of costs and contributions (forms of funding)9 to be used for each budget category. If unit costs or contributions are used, the details on the calculation will be explained in Annex 2a. 5.5 Budget flexibility The budget breakdown may be adjusted — without an amendment (see Article 39) — by transfers (between participants and budget categories), as long as this does not imply any substantive or important change to the description of the action in Annex 1. However: - changes to the budget category for volunteers (if used) always require an amendment - changes to budget categories with lump sums costs or contributions (if used; including financing not linked to costs) always require an amendment - changes to budget categories with higher funding rates or budget ceilings (if used) always require an amendment - addition of amounts for subcontracts not provided for in Annex 1 either require an amendment or simplified approval in accordance with Article 6.2 - other changes require an amendment or simplified approval, if specifically provided for in Article 6.2 - flexibility caps: not applicable. 9 See Article 125 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. 18 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 ARTICLE 6 — ELIGIBLE AND INELIGIBLE COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS In order to be eligible, costs and contributions must meet the eligibility conditions set out in this Article. 6.1 General eligibility conditions The general eligibility conditions are the following: (a) for actual costs: (i) they must be actually incurred by the beneficiary (ii) they must be incurred in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21) (iii) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (iv) they must be incurred in connection with the action as described in Annex 1 and necessary for its implementation (v) they must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular recorded in the beneficiary’s accounts in accordance with the accounting standards applicable in the country where the beneficiary is established and with the beneficiary’s usual cost accounting practices (vi) they must comply with the applicable national law on taxes, labour and social security and (vii) they must be reasonable, justified and must comply with the principle of sound financial management, in particular regarding economy and efficiency (b) for unit costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (ii) the units must: - be actually used or produced by the beneficiary in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of units relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be used or produced afterwards; see Article 21) - be necessary for the implementation of the action and (iii) the number of units must be identifiable and verifiable, in particular supported by records and documentation (see Article 20) (c) for flat-rate costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 19 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 (ii) the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied must: - be eligible - relate to the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of costs or contributions relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be incurred afterwards; see Article 21) (d) for lump sum costs or contributions (if any): (i) they must be declared under one of the budget categories set out in Article 6.2 and Annex 2 (ii) the work must be properly implemented by the beneficiary in accordance with Annex 1 (iii) the deliverables/outputs must be achieved in the period set out in Article 4 (with the exception of deliverables/outputs relating to the submission of the final periodic report, which may be achieved afterwards; see Article 21) (e) for unit, flat-rate or lump sum costs or contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any): (i) they must fulfil the general eligibility conditions for the type of cost concerned (ii) the cost accounting practices must be applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding (f) for financing not linked to costs (if any): the results must be achieved or the conditions must be fulfilled as described in Annex 1. In addition, for direct cost categories (e.g. personnel, travel & subsistence, subcontracting and other direct costs) only costs that are directly linked to the action implementation and can therefore be attributed to it directly are eligible. They must not include any indirect costs (i.e. costs that are only indirectly linked to the action, e.g. via cost drivers). 6.2 Specific eligibility conditions for each budget category For each budget category, the specific eligibility conditions are as follows: Direct costs A. Personnel costs A.1 Costs for employees (or equivalent) are eligible as personnel costs if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are related to personnel working for the beneficiary under an employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and assigned to the action. They must be limited to salaries, social security contributions, taxes and other costs linked to the remuneration, if they arise from national law or the employment contract (or equivalent appointing act) and be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, in accordance with the following method: 20 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 {daily rate for the person multiplied by number of day-equivalents worked on the action (rounded up or down to the nearest half-day)}. The daily rate must be calculated as: {annual personnel costs for the person divided by 215}. The number of day-equivalents declared for a person must be identifiable and verifiable (see Article 20). The total number of day-equivalents declared in EU grants, for a person for a year, cannot be higher than 215. The personnel costs may also include supplementary payments for personnel assigned to the action (including payments on the basis of supplementary contracts regardless of their nature), if: - it is part of the beneficiary’s usual remuneration practices and is paid in a consistent manner whenever the same kind of work or expertise is required - the criteria used to calculate the supplementary payments are objective and generally applied by the beneficiary, regardless of the source of funding used. A.2 and A.3 Costs for natural persons working under a direct contract other than an employment contract and costs for seconded persons by a third party against payment are also eligible as personnel costs, if they are assigned to the action, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and: (a) work under conditions similar to those of an employee (in particular regarding the way the work is organised, the tasks that are performed and the premises where they are performed) and (b) the result of the work belongs to the beneficiary (unless agreed otherwise). They must be calculated on the basis of a rate which corresponds to the costs actually incurred for the direct contract or secondment and must not be significantly different from those for personnel performing similar tasks under an employment contract with the beneficiary. A.4 The work of SME owners for the action (i.e. owners of beneficiaries that are small and medium- sized enterprises10 not receiving a salary) or natural person beneficiaries (i.e. beneficiaries that are natural persons not receiving a salary) may be declared as personnel costs, if they fulfil the general 10 For the definition, see Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC: micro, small or medium-sized enterprise (SME) are enterprises - engaged in an economic activity, irrespective of their legal form (including, in particular, self- employed persons and family businesses engaged in craft or other activities, and partnerships or associations regularly engaged in an economic activity) and - employing fewer than 250 persons (expressed in ‘annual working units’ as defined in Article 5 of the Recommendation) and which have an annual turnover not exceeding EUR 50 million, and/or an annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million. 21 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 eligibility conditions and are calculated as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a. B. Subcontracting costs Subcontracting costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges, such as non- deductible or non-refundable value added tax (VAT)) are eligible, if they are calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred, fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are awarded using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure subcontracts with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12). Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement. Subcontracting may cover only a limited part of the action. The tasks to be subcontracted and the estimated cost for each subcontract must be set out in Annex 1 and the total estimated costs of subcontracting per beneficiary must be set out in Annex 2 (or may be approved ex post in the periodic report, if the use of subcontracting does not entail changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants; ‘simplified approval procedure’). C. Purchase costs Purchase costs for the action (including related duties, taxes and charges, such as non-deductible or non-refundable value added tax (VAT)) are eligible if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions and are bought using the beneficiary’s usual purchasing practices — provided these ensure purchases with best value for money (or if appropriate the lowest price) and that there is no conflict of interests (see Article 12). Beneficiaries that are ‘contracting authorities/entities’ within the meaning of the EU Directives on public procurement must also comply with the applicable national law on public procurement. C.1 Travel and subsistence Purchases for travel, accommodation and subsistence must be calculated as follows: - travel: as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a if covered by Decision C(2021)3511 or otherwise as costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel - accommodation: as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a if covered by Decision C(2021)3512 or otherwise as costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel - subsistence: as unit costs in accordance with the method set out in Annex 2a if covered by 11 Commission Decision of 12 January 2021 authorising the use of unit costs for travel, accommodation and subsistence costs under an action or work programme under the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework (C(2021)35). 12 Commission Decision of 12 January 2021 authorising the use of unit costs for travel, accommodation and subsistence costs under an action or work programme under the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework (C(2021)35). 22 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Decision C(2021)3513 or otherwise as costs actually incurred and in line with the beneficiary’s usual practices on travel. C.2 Equipment Purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets used for the action must be declared as depreciation costs, calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred and written off in accordance with international accounting standards and the beneficiary’s usual accounting practices. Only the portion of the costs that corresponds to the rate of actual use for the action during the action duration can be taken into account. Costs for renting or leasing equipment, infrastructure or other assets are also eligible, if they do not exceed the depreciation costs of similar equipment, infrastructure or assets and do not include any financing fees. C.3 Other goods, works and services Purchases of other goods, works and services must be calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred. Such goods, works and services include, for instance, consumables and supplies, promotion, dissemination, protection of results, translations, publications, certificates and financial guarantees, if required under the Agreement. D. Other cost categories D.1 Financial support to third parties Costs for providing financial support to third parties (in the form of grants, prizes or similar forms of support; if any) are eligible, if and as declared eligible in the call conditions, if they fulfil the general eligibility conditions, are calculated on the basis of the costs actually incurred and the support is implemented in accordance with the conditions set out in Annex 1. These conditions must ensure objective and transparent selection procedures and include at least the following: (a) for grants (or similar): (i) the maximum amount of financial support for each third party (‘recipient’); this amount may not exceed the amount set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 3) or otherwise agreed with the granting authority (ii) the criteria for calculating the exact amount of the financial support (iii) the different types of activity that qualify for financial support, on the basis of a closed list (iv) the persons or categories of persons that will be supported and (v) the criteria and procedures for giving financial support 13 Commission Decision of 12 January 2021 authorising the use of unit costs for travel, accommodation and subsistence costs under an action or work programme under the 2021-2027 multi-annual financial framework (C(2021)35). 23 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 (b) for prizes (or similar): (i) the eligibility and award criteria (ii) the amount of the prize and (iii) the payment arrangements. Indirect costs E. Indirect costs Indirect costs will be reimbursed at the flat-rate of 7% of the eligible direct costs (categories A-D, except volunteers costs and exempted specific cost categories, if any). Contributions Not applicable 6.3 Ineligible costs and contributions The following costs or contributions are ineligible: (a) costs or contributions that do not comply with the conditions set out above (Article 6.1 and 6.2), in particular: (i) costs related to return on capital and dividends paid by a beneficiary (ii) debt and debt service charges (iii) provisions for future losses or debts (iv) interest owed (v) currency exchange losses (vi) bank costs charged by the beneficiary’s bank for transfers from the granting authority (vii) excessive or reckless expenditure (viii) deductible or refundable VAT (including VAT paid by public bodies acting as public authority) (ix) costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant agreement suspension (see Article 31) (x) in-kind contributions by third parties (b) costs or contributions declared under other EU grants (or grants awarded by an EU Member State, non-EU country or other body implementing the EU budget), except for the following cases: (i) Synergy actions: not applicable 24 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 (ii) if the action grant is combined with an operating grant14 running during the same period and the beneficiary can demonstrate that the operating grant does not cover any (direct or indirect) costs of the action grant (c) costs or contributions for staff of a national (or regional/local) administration, for activities that are part of the administration’s normal activities (i.e. not undertaken only because of the grant) (d) costs or contributions (especially travel and subsistence) for staff or representatives of EU institutions, bodies or agencies (e) other : (i) country restrictions for eligible costs: not applicable (ii) costs or contributions declared specifically ineligible in the call conditions. 6.4 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary declares costs or contributions that are ineligible, they will be rejected (see Article 27). This may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. CHAPTER 4 GRANT IMPLEMENTATION SECTION 1 CONSORTIUM: BENEFICIARIES, AFFILIATED ENTITIES AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS ARTICLE 7 — BENEFICIARIES The beneficiaries, as signatories of the Agreement, are fully responsible towards the granting authority for implementing it and for complying with all its obligations. They must implement the Agreement to their best abilities, in good faith and in accordance with all the obligations and terms and conditions it sets out. They must have the appropriate resources to implement the action and implement the action under their own responsibility and in accordance with Article 11. If they rely on affiliated entities or other participants (see Articles 8 and 9), they retain sole responsibility towards the granting authority and the other beneficiaries. They are jointly responsible for the technical implementation of the action. If one of the beneficiaries fails to implement their part of the action, the other beneficiaries must ensure that this part is implemented by someone else (without being entitled to an increase of the maximum grant amount and subject to an amendment; see Article 39). The financial responsibility of each beneficiary in case of recoveries is governed by Article 22. 14 For the definition, see Article 180(2)(b) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: ‘operating grant’ means an EU grant to finance “the functioning of a body which has an objective forming part of and supporting an EU policy”. 25 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The beneficiaries (and their action) must remain eligible under the EU programme funding the grant for the entire duration of the action. Costs and contributions will be eligible only as long as the beneficiary and the action are eligible. The internal roles and responsibilities of the beneficiaries are divided as follows: (a) Each beneficiary must: (i) keep information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date (see Article 19) (ii) inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) immediately of any events or circumstances likely to affect significantly or delay the implementation of the action (see Article 19) (iii) submit to the coordinator in good time: - the prefinancing guarantees (if required; see Article 23) - the financial statements and certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) - the contribution to the deliverables and technical reports (see Article 21) - any other documents or information required by the granting authority under the Agreement (iv) submit via the Portal data and information related to the participation of their affiliated entities. (b) The coordinator must: (i) monitor that the action is implemented properly (see Article 11) (ii) act as the intermediary for all communications between the consortium and the granting authority, unless the Agreement or granting authority specifies otherwise, and in particular: - submit the prefinancing guarantees to the granting authority (if any) - request and review any documents or information required and verify their quality and completeness before passing them on to the granting authority - submit the deliverables and reports to the granting authority - inform the granting authority about the payments made to the other beneficiaries (report on the distribution of payments; if required, see Articles 22 and 32) (iii) distribute the payments received from the granting authority to the other beneficiaries without unjustified delay (see Article 22). The coordinator may not delegate or subcontract the above-mentioned tasks to any other beneficiary or third party (including affiliated entities). 26 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 However, coordinators which are public bodies may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(ii) last indent and (iii) above to entities with ‘authorisation to administer’ which they have created or which are controlled by or affiliated to them. In this case, the coordinator retains sole responsibility for the payments and for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. Moreover, coordinators which are ‘sole beneficiaries’15 (or similar, such as European research infrastructure consortia (ERICs)) may delegate the tasks set out in Point (b)(i) to (iii) above to one of their members. The coordinator retains sole responsibility for compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. The beneficiaries must have internal arrangements regarding their operation and co-ordination, to ensure that the action is implemented properly. If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 1), these arrangements must be set out in a written consortium agreement between the beneficiaries, covering for instance: - the internal organisation of the consortium - the management of access to the Portal - different distribution keys for the payments and financial responsibilities in case of recoveries (if any) - additional rules on rights and obligations related to background and results (see Article 16) - settlement of internal disputes - liability, indemnification and confidentiality arrangements between the beneficiaries. The internal arrangements must not contain any provision contrary to this Agreement. ARTICLE 8 — AFFILIATED ENTITIES The following entities which are linked to a beneficiary will participate in the action as ‘affiliated entities’: - UNIVERSITAET LEIPZIG (ULEI), PIC 999854564, linked to BUNDESZENTRALE FUR GESUNDHEITLICHE AUFKLARUNG (BzGA) - FREIE HANSESTADT BREMEN (SB), PIC 998928796, linked to BUNDESZENTRALE FUR GESUNDHEITLICHE AUFKLARUNG (BzGA) - ORSZAGOS KORHAZI FOIGAZGATOSAG (OKFŐ), PIC 891516331, linked to NEMZETI NEPEGESZSEGUGYI ES GYOGYSZERESZETI KOZPONT (NNGYK) - MAGYARORSZAGI REFORMATUS EGYHAZ BETHESDA GYERMEKKORHAZA (BCH), PIC 918286488, linked to NEMZETI NEPEGESZSEGUGYI ES GYOGYSZERESZETI KOZPONT (NNGYK) 15 For the definition, see Article 187(2) EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046: “Where several entities satisfy the criteria for being awarded a grant and together form one entity, that entity may be treated as the sole beneficiary, including where it is specifically established for the purpose of implementing the action financed by the grant.” 27 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - HEILSUGAESLA HOFUDBORGARSVAEDISINS (PHCI), PIC 917819724, linked to LANDLAEKNIS EMBAETTID (DOHI) - LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (NUHI), PIC 999821390, linked to LANDLAEKNIS EMBAETTID (DOHI) - AZIENDA ULSS 4 VENETO ORIENTALE (PROMIS), PIC 953342870, linked to ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA (ISS) - AZIENDA SANITARIA LOCALE CITTA DI TORINO (ASL TORINO), PIC 899690036, linked to ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA (ISS) - UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO-BICOCCA (UniMiBI), PIC 999923531, linked to ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA (ISS) - STICHTING TRIMBOS- INSTITUUT, NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION (TRIMBOS), PIC 998923073, linked to RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID EN MILIEU (RIVM) - STATISTISK SENTRALBYRAA (SSB), PIC 999456379, linked to FOLKEHELSEINSTITUTTET (NIPH) - DEPARTAMENT DE SALUT - GENERALITAT DE CATALUNYA (GENCAT), PIC 999826919, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - FUNDACIO DE RECERCA CLINIC BARCELONA-INSTITUT D INVESTIGACIONS BIOMEDIQUES AUGUST PI I SUNYER (FRCB-IDIBAPS), PIC 999477525, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD- BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - INSTITUT CATALA D'ONCOLOGIA (ICO), PIC 998420031, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - FUNDACION INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION MARQUES DE VALDECILLA (IDIVAL), PIC 946556944, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E INVESTIGACION SANITARIAS DE LA REGION DE MURCIA (FFIS), PIC 962632463, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - SERVICIO MURCIANO DE SALUD (SMS), PIC 934953804, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - SERVICIO ANDALUZ DE SALUD (SAS), PIC 998853621, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) - FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E INVESTIGACION DE LOS 28 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 PROFESIONALES DE LASALUD DE EXTREMADURA FUNDESALUD (FUNDESALUD), PIC 932288729, linked to ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK (BIOSISTEMAK) Affiliated entities can charge costs and contributions to the action under the same conditions as the beneficiaries and must implement the action tasks attributed to them in Annex 1 in accordance with Article 11. Their costs and contributions will be included in Annex 2 and will be taken into account for the calculation of the grant. The beneficiaries must ensure that all their obligations under this Agreement also apply to their affiliated entities. The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the affiliated entities. Breaches by affiliated entities will be handled in the same manner as breaches by beneficiaries. Recovery of undue amounts will be handled through the beneficiaries. If the granting authority requires joint and several liability of affiliated entities (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4), they must sign the declaration set out in Annex 3a and may be held liable in case of enforced recoveries against their beneficiaries (see Article 22.2 and 22.4). ARTICLE 9 — OTHER PARTICIPANTS INVOLVED IN THE ACTION 9.1 Associated partners The following entities which cooperate with a beneficiary will participate in the action as ‘associated partners’: - MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE (DISA), PIC 998888153 - MEDIZINISCHE HOCHSCHULE BRANDENBURG CAMPUS GMBH (MHB), PIC 898913260 - REGIONE LOMBARDIA (LOMBARDIA), PIC 999654065 - HELSEDIREKTORATET (HDIR), PIC 974772304 - SERVICIO EXTREMENO DE SALUD (SES), PIC 893253116 Associated partners must implement the action tasks attributed to them in Annex 1 in accordance with Article 11. They may not charge costs or contributions to the action and the costs for their tasks are not eligible. The tasks must be set out in Annex 1. The beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 11 (proper implementation), 12 (conflict of interests), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping) also apply to the associated partners. 29 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the associated partners. 9.2 Third parties giving in-kind contributions to the action Other third parties may give in-kind contributions to the action (i.e. personnel, equipment, other goods, works and services, etc. which are free-of-charge), if necessary for the implementation. Third parties giving in-kind contributions do not implement any action tasks. They may not charge costs or contributions to the action and the costs for the in-kind contributions are not eligible. The third parties and their in-kind contributions should be set out in Annex 1. 9.3 Subcontractors Subcontractors may participate in the action, if necessary for the implementation. Subcontractors must implement their action tasks in accordance with Article 11. The costs for the subcontracted tasks (invoiced price from the subcontractor) are eligible and may be charged by the beneficiaries, under the conditions set out in Article 6. The costs will be included in Annex 2 as part of the beneficiaries’ costs. The beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 11 (proper implementation), 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping) also apply to the subcontractors. The beneficiaries must ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the subcontractors. 9.4 Recipients of financial support to third parties If the action includes providing financial support to third parties (e.g. grants, prizes or similar forms of support), the beneficiaries must ensure that their contractual obligations under Articles 12 (conflict of interest), 13 (confidentiality and security), 14 (ethics), 17.2 (visibility), 18 (specific rules for carrying out action), 19 (information) and 20 (record-keeping)also apply to the third parties receiving the support (recipients). The beneficiaries must also ensure that the bodies mentioned in Article 25 (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.) can exercise their rights also towards the recipients. ARTICLE 10 — PARTICIPANTS WITH SPECIAL STATUS 10.1 Non-EU participants Participants which are established in a non-EU country (if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and: - to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data) 30 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use qualified external auditors which are independent and comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC16 - for the controls under Article 25: to allow for checks, reviews, audits and investigations (including on-the-spot checks, visits and inspections) by the bodies mentioned in that Article (e.g. granting authority, OLAF, Court of Auditors (ECA), etc.). Special rules on dispute settlement apply (see Data Sheet, Point 5). 10.2 Participants which are international organisations Participants which are international organisations (IOs; if any) undertake to comply with their obligations under the Agreement and: - to respect general principles (including fundamental rights, values and ethical principles, environmental and labour standards, rules on classified information, intellectual property rights, visibility of funding and protection of personal data) - for the submission of certificates under Article 24: to use either independent public officers or external auditors which comply with comparable standards as those set out in EU Directive 2006/43/EC - for the controls under Article 25: to allow for the checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the bodies mentioned in that Article, taking into account the specific agreements concluded by them and the EU (if any). For such participants, nothing in the Agreement will be interpreted as a waiver of their privileges or immunities, as accorded by their constituent documents or international law. Special rules on applicable law and dispute settlement apply (see Article 43 and Data Sheet, Point 5). 10.3 Pillar-assessed participants Pillar-assessed participants (if any) may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in so far as they have been positively assessed and do not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries. ‘Pillar-assessment’ means a review by the European Commission on the systems, rules and procedures which participants use for managing EU grants (in particular internal control system, accounting system, external audits, financing of third parties, rules on recovery and exclusion, information on recipients and protection of personal data; see Article 154 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046). Participants with a positive pillar assessment may rely on their own systems, rules and procedures, in particular for: - record-keeping (Article 20): may be done in accordance with internal standards, rules and procedures 16 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts or similar national regulations (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87). 31 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - currency conversion for financial statements (Article 21): may be done in accordance with usual accounting practices - guarantees (Article 23): for public law bodies, prefinancing guarantees are not needed - certificates (Article 24): - certificates on the financial statements (CFS): may be provided by their regular internal or external auditors and in accordance with their internal financial regulations and procedures - certificates on usual accounting practices (CoMUC): are not needed if those practices are covered by an ex-ante assessment and use the following specific rules, for: - recoveries (Article 22): in case of financial support to third parties, there will be no recovery if the participant has done everything possible to retrieve the undue amounts from the third party receiving the support (including legal proceedings) and non-recovery is not due to an error or negligence on its part - checks, reviews, audits and investigations by the EU (Article 25): will be conducted taking into account the rules and procedures specifically agreed between them and the framework agreement (if any) - impact evaluation (Article 26): will be conducted in accordance with the participant’s internal rules and procedures and the framework agreement (if any) - grant agreement suspension (Article 31): certain costs incurred during grant suspension are eligible (notably, minimum costs necessary for a possible resumption of the action and costs relating to contracts which were entered into before the pre-information letter was received and which could not reasonably be suspended, reallocated or terminated on legal grounds) - grant agreement termination (Article 32): the final grant amount and final payment will be calculated taking into account also costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination takes effect, if the contract was entered into before the pre-information letter was received and could not reasonably be terminated on legal grounds - liability for damages (Article 33.2): the granting authority must be compensated for damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement only if the damage is due to an infringement of the participant’s internal rules and procedures or due to a violation of third parties’ rights by the participant or one of its employees or individual for whom the employees are responsible. Participants whose pillar assessment covers procurement and granting procedures may also do purchases, subcontracting and financial support to third parties (Article 6.2) in accordance with their internal rules and procedures for purchases, subcontracting and financial support. Participants whose pillar assessment covers data protection rules may rely on their internal standards, rules and procedures for data protection (Article 15). 32 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The participants may however not rely on provisions which would breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries or call into question the decision awarding the grant, such as in particular: - eligibility (Article 6) - consortium roles and set-up (Articles 7-9) - security and ethics (Articles 13, 14) - IPR (including background and results, access rights and rights of use), communication, dissemination and visibility (Articles 16 and 17) - information obligation (Article 19) - payment, reporting and amendments (Articles 21, 22 and 39) - rejections, reductions, suspensions and terminations (Articles 27, 28, 29-32) If the pillar assessment was subject to remedial measures, reliance on the internal systems, rules and procedures is subject to compliance with those remedial measures. Participants whose assessment has not yet been updated to cover (the new rules on) data protection may rely on their internal systems, rules and procedures, provided that they ensure that personal data is: - processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subject - collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes - adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed - accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date - kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data is processed and - processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the personal data. Participants must inform the coordinator without delay of any changes to the systems, rules and procedures that were part of the pillar assessment. The coordinator must immediately inform the granting authority. Pillar-assessed participants that have also concluded a framework agreement with the EU, may moreover — under the same conditions as those above (i.e. not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants or beneficiaries) — rely on the provisions set out in that framework agreement. SECTION 2 RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION ARTICLE 11 — PROPER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ACTION 33 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 11.1 Obligation to properly implement the action The beneficiaries must implement the action as described in Annex 1 and in compliance with the provisions of the Agreement, the call conditions and all legal obligations under applicable EU, international and national law. 11.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 12 — CONFLICT OF INTERESTS 12.1 Conflict of interests The beneficiaries must take all measures to prevent any situation where the impartial and objective implementation of the Agreement could be compromised for reasons involving family, emotional life, political or national affinity, economic interest or any other direct or indirect interest (‘conflict of interests’). They must formally notify the granting authority without delay of any situation constituting or likely to lead to a conflict of interests and immediately take all the necessary steps to rectify this situation. The granting authority may verify that the measures taken are appropriate and may require additional measures to be taken by a specified deadline. 12.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the beneficiary may be terminated (see Article 32). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 13 — CONFIDENTIALITY AND SECURITY 13.1 Sensitive information The parties must keep confidential any data, documents or other material (in any form) that is identified as sensitive in writing (‘sensitive information’) — during the implementation of the action and for at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). If a beneficiary requests, the granting authority may agree to keep such information confidential for a longer period. Unless otherwise agreed between the parties, they may use sensitive information only to implement the Agreement. The beneficiaries may disclose sensitive information to their personnel or other participants involved in the action only if they: 34 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 (a) need to know it in order to implement the Agreement and (b) are bound by an obligation of confidentiality. The granting authority may disclose sensitive information to its staff and to other EU institutions and bodies. It may moreover disclose sensitive information to third parties, if: (a) this is necessary to implement the Agreement or safeguard the EU financial interests and (b) the recipients of the information are bound by an obligation of confidentiality. The confidentiality obligations no longer apply if: (a) the disclosing party agrees to release the other party (b) the information becomes publicly available, without breaching any confidentiality obligation (c) the disclosure of the sensitive information is required by EU, international or national law. Specific confidentiality rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 13.2 Classified information The parties must handle classified information in accordance with the applicable EU, international or national law on classified information (in particular, Decision 2015/44417 and its implementing rules). Deliverables which contain classified information must be submitted according to special procedures agreed with the granting authority. Action tasks involving classified information may be subcontracted only after explicit approval (in writing) from the granting authority. Classified information may not be disclosed to any third party (including participants involved in the action implementation) without prior explicit written approval from the granting authority. Specific security rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 13.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 14 — ETHICS AND VALUES 14.1 Ethics 17 Commission Decision 2015/444/EC, Euratom of 13 March 2015 on the security rules for protecting EU classified information (OJ L 72, 17.3.2015, p. 53). 35 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The action must be carried out in line with the highest ethical standards and the applicable EU, international and national law on ethical principles. Specific ethics rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 14.2 Values The beneficiaries must commit to and ensure the respect of basic EU values (such as respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the rule of law and human rights, including the rights of minorities). Specific rules on values (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 14.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 15 — DATA PROTECTION 15.1 Data processing by the granting authority Any personal data under the Agreement will be processed under the responsibility of the data controller of the granting authority in accordance with and for the purposes set out in the Portal Privacy Statement. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission, an EU regulatory or executive agency, joint undertaking or other EU body, the processing will be subject to Regulation 2018/172518. 15.2 Data processing by the beneficiaries The beneficiaries must process personal data under the Agreement in compliance with the applicable EU, international and national law on data protection (in particular, Regulation 2016/67919). They must ensure that personal data is: - processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner in relation to the data subjects - collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes and not further processed in a manner that is incompatible with those purposes 18 Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39). 19 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (‘GDPR’) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). 36 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed - accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date - kept in a form which permits identification of data subjects for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the data is processed and - processed in a manner that ensures appropriate security of the data. The beneficiaries may grant their personnel access to personal data only if it is strictly necessary for implementing, managing and monitoring the Agreement. The beneficiaries must ensure that the personnel is under a confidentiality obligation. The beneficiaries must inform the persons whose data are transferred to the granting authority and provide them with the Portal Privacy Statement. 15.3 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 16 — INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) — BACKGROUND AND RESULTS —ACCESS RIGHTS AND RIGHTS OF USE 16.1 Background and access rights to background The beneficiaries must give each other and the other participants access to the background identified as needed for implementing the action, subject to any specific rules in Annex 5. ‘Background’ means any data, know-how or information — whatever its form or nature (tangible or intangible), including any rights such as intellectual property rights — that is: (a) held by the beneficiaries before they acceded to the Agreement and (b) needed to implement the action or exploit the results. If background is subject to rights of a third party, the beneficiary concerned must ensure that it is able to comply with its obligations under the Agreement. 16.2 Ownership of results The granting authority does not obtain ownership of the results produced under the action. ‘Results’ means any tangible or intangible effect of the action, such as data, know-how or information, whatever its form or nature, whether or not it can be protected, as well as any rights attached to it, including intellectual property rights. 16.3 Rights of use of the granting authority on materials, documents and information received for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes 37 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The granting authority has the right to use non-sensitive information relating to the action and materials and documents received from the beneficiaries (notably summaries for publication, deliverables, as well as any other material, such as pictures or audio-visual material, in paper or electronic form) for policy, information, communication, dissemination and publicity purposes — during the action or afterwards. The right to use the beneficiaries’ materials, documents and information is granted in the form of a royalty-free, non-exclusive and irrevocable licence, which includes the following rights: (a) use for its own purposes (in particular, making them available to persons working for the granting authority or any other EU service (including institutions, bodies, offices, agencies, etc.) or EU Member State institution or body; copying or reproducing them in whole or in part, in unlimited numbers; and communication through press information services) (b) distribution to the public (in particular, publication as hard copies and in electronic or digital format, publication on the internet, as a downloadable or non-downloadable file, broadcasting by any channel, public display or presentation, communicating through press information services, or inclusion in widely accessible databases or indexes) (c) editing or redrafting (including shortening, summarising, inserting other elements (e.g. meta-data, legends, other graphic, visual, audio or text elements), extracting parts (e.g. audio or video files), dividing into parts, use in a compilation) (d) translation (e) storage in paper, electronic or other form (f) archiving, in line with applicable document-management rules (g) the right to authorise third parties to act on its behalf or sub-license to third parties the modes of use set out in Points (b), (c), (d) and (f), if needed for the information, communication and publicity activity of the granting authority (h) processing, analysing, aggregating the materials, documents and information received and producing derivative works. The rights of use are granted for the whole duration of the industrial or intellectual property rights concerned. If materials or documents are subject to moral rights or third party rights (including intellectual property rights or rights of natural persons on their image and voice), the beneficiaries must ensure that they comply with their obligations under this Agreement (in particular, by obtaining the necessary licences and authorisations from the rights holders concerned). Where applicable, the granting authority will insert the following information: “© – [year] – [name of the copyright owner]. All rights reserved. Licensed to the [name of granting authority] under conditions.” 16.4 Specific rules on IPR, results and background Specific rules regarding intellectual property rights, results and background (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 38 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 16.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 17 — COMMUNICATION, DISSEMINATION AND VISIBILITY 17.1 Communication — Dissemination — Promoting the action Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, the beneficiaries must promote the action and its results by providing targeted information to multiple audiences (including the media and the public), in accordance with Annex 1 and in a strategic, coherent and effective manner. Before engaging in a communication or dissemination activity expected to have a major media impact, the beneficiaries must inform the granting authority. 17.2 Visibility — European flag and funding statement Unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority, communication activities of the beneficiaries related to the action (including media relations, conferences, seminars, information material, such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations, etc., in electronic form, via traditional or social media, etc.), dissemination activities and any infrastructure, equipment, vehicles, supplies or major result funded by the grant must acknowledge EU support and display the European flag (emblem) and funding statement (translated into local languages, where appropriate): The emblem must remain distinct and separate and cannot be modified by adding other visual marks, brands or text. 39 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Apart from the emblem, no other visual identity or logo may be used to highlight the EU support. When displayed in association with other logos (e.g. of beneficiaries or sponsors), the emblem must be displayed at least as prominently and visibly as the other logos. For the purposes of their obligations under this Article, the beneficiaries may use the emblem without first obtaining approval from the granting authority. This does not, however, give them the right to exclusive use. Moreover, they may not appropriate the emblem or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means. 17.3 Quality of information — Disclaimer Any communication or dissemination activity related to the action must use factually accurate information. Moreover, it must indicate the following disclaimer (translated into local languages where appropriate): “Funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or [name of the granting authority]. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.” 17.4 Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules Specific communication, dissemination and visibility rules (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 17.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 18 — SPECIFIC RULES FOR CARRYING OUT THE ACTION 18.1 Specific rules for carrying out the action Specific rules for implementing the action (if any) are set out in Annex 5. 18.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such a breach may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. SECTION 3 GRANT ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE 19 — GENERAL INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS 19.1 Information requests 40 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The beneficiaries must provide — during the action or afterwards and in accordance with Article 7 — any information requested in order to verify eligibility of the costs or contributions declared, proper implementation of the action and compliance with the other obligations under the Agreement. The information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. 19.2 Participant Register data updates The beneficiaries must keep — at all times, during the action or afterwards — their information stored in the Portal Participant Register up to date, in particular, their name, address, legal representatives, legal form and organisation type. 19.3 Information about events and circumstances which impact the action The beneficiaries must immediately inform the granting authority (and the other beneficiaries) of any of the following: (a) events which are likely to affect or delay the implementation of the action or affect the EU’s financial interests, in particular: (i) changes in their legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour signed before grant signature) (ii) linked action information: not applicable (b) circumstances affecting: (i) the decision to award the grant or (ii) compliance with requirements under the Agreement. 19.4 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 20 — RECORD-KEEPING 20.1 Keeping records and supporting documents The beneficiaries must — at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6) — keep records and other supporting documents to prove the proper implementation of the action in line with the accepted standards in the respective field (if any). In addition, the beneficiaries must — for the same period — keep the following to justify the amounts declared: (a) for actual costs: adequate records and supporting documents to prove the costs declared (such 41 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 as contracts, subcontracts, invoices and accounting records); in addition, the beneficiaries’ usual accounting and internal control procedures must enable direct reconciliation between the amounts declared, the amounts recorded in their accounts and the amounts stated in the supporting documents (b) for flat-rate costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the eligibility of the costs or contributions to which the flat-rate is applied (c) for the following simplified costs and contributions: the beneficiaries do not need to keep specific records on the actual costs incurred, but must keep: (i) for unit costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the number of units declared (ii) for lump sum costs and contributions (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove proper implementation of the work as described in Annex 1 (iii) for financing not linked to costs (if any): adequate records and supporting documents to prove the achievement of the results or the fulfilment of the conditions as described in Annex 1 (d) for unit, flat-rate and lump sum costs and contributions according to usual cost accounting practices (if any): the beneficiaries must keep any adequate records and supporting documents to prove that their cost accounting practices have been applied in a consistent manner, based on objective criteria, regardless of the source of funding, and that they comply with the eligibility conditions set out in Articles 6.1 and 6.2. Moreover, the following is needed for specific budget categories: (e) for personnel costs: time worked for the beneficiary under the action must be supported by declarations signed monthly by the person and their supervisor, unless another reliable time-record system is in place; the granting authority may accept alternative evidence supporting the time worked for the action declared, if it considers that it offers an adequate level of assurance (f) additional record-keeping rules: not applicable The records and supporting documents must be made available upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25). If there are on-going checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims under the Agreement (including the extension of findings; see Article 25), the beneficiaries must keep these records and other supporting documentation until the end of these procedures. The beneficiaries must keep the original documents. Digital and digitalised documents are considered originals if they are authorised by the applicable national law. The granting authority may accept non-original documents if they offer a comparable level of assurance. 20.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently 42 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 21 — REPORTING 21.1 Continuous reporting The beneficiaries must continuously report on the progress of the action (e.g. deliverables, milestones, outputs/outcomes, critical risks, indicators, etc; if any), in the Portal Continuous Reporting tool and in accordance with the timing and conditions it sets out (as agreed with the granting authority). Standardised deliverables (e.g. progress reports not linked to payments, reports on cumulative expenditure, special reports, etc; if any) must be submitted using the templates published on the Portal. 21.2 Periodic reporting: Technical reports and financial statements In addition, the beneficiaries must provide reports to request payments, in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2): - for additional prefinancings (if any): an additional prefinancing report - for interim payments (if any) and the final payment: a periodic report. The prefinancing and periodic reports include a technical and financial part. The technical part includes an overview of the action implementation. It must be prepared using the template available in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool. The financial part of the additional prefinancing report includes a statement on the use of the previous prefinancing payment. The financial part of the periodic report includes: - the financial statements (individual and consolidated; for all beneficiaries/affiliated entities) - the explanation on the use of resources (or detailed cost reporting table, if required) - the certificates on the financial statements (CFS) (if required; see Article 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3). The financial statements must detail the eligible costs and contributions for each budget category and, for the final payment, also the revenues for the action (see Articles 6 and 22). All eligible costs and contributions incurred should be declared, even if they exceed the amounts indicated in the estimated budget (see Annex 2). Amounts that are not declared in the individual financial statements will not be taken into account by the granting authority. By signing the financial statements (directly in the Portal Periodic Reporting tool), the beneficiaries confirm that: 43 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - the information provided is complete, reliable and true - the costs and contributions declared are eligible (see Article 6) - the costs and contributions can be substantiated by adequate records and supporting documents (see Article 20) that will be produced upon request (see Article 19) or in the context of checks, reviews, audits and investigations (see Article 25) - for the final periodic report: all the revenues have been declared (if required; see Article 22). Beneficiaries will have to submit also the financial statements of their affiliated entities (if any). In case of recoveries (see Article 22), beneficiaries will be held responsible also for the financial statements of their affiliated entities. 21.3 Currency for financial statements and conversion into euros The financial statements must be drafted in euro. Beneficiaries with general accounts established in a currency other than the euro must convert the costs recorded in their accounts into euro, at the average of the daily exchange rates published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union (ECB website), calculated over the corresponding reporting period. If no daily euro exchange rate is published in the Official Journal for the currency in question, they must be converted at the average of the monthly accounting exchange rates published on the European Commission website (InforEuro), calculated over the corresponding reporting period. Beneficiaries with general accounts in euro must convert costs incurred in another currency into euro according to their usual accounting practices. 21.4 Reporting language The reporting must be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 21.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a report submitted does not comply with this Article, the granting authority may suspend the payment deadline (see Article 29) and apply other measures described in Chapter 5. If the coordinator breaches its reporting obligations, the granting authority may terminate the grant or the coordinator’s participation (see Article 32) or apply other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 22 — PAYMENTS AND RECOVERIES — CALCULATION OF AMOUNTS DUE 22.1 Payments and payment arrangements Payments will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). They will be made in euro to the bank account indicated by the coordinator (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) 44 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 and must be distributed without unjustified delay (restrictions may apply to distribution of the initial prefinancing payment; see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). Payments to this bank account will discharge the granting authority from its payment obligation. The cost of payment transfers will be borne as follows: - the granting authority bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank - the beneficiary bears the cost of transfers charged by its bank - the party causing a repetition of a transfer bears all costs of the repeated transfer. Payments by the granting authority will be considered to have been carried out on the date when they are debited to its account. 22.2 Recoveries Recoveries will be made, if — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — it turns out that the granting authority has paid too much and needs to recover the amounts undue. The general liability regime for recoveries (first-line liability) is as follows: At final payment, the coordinator will be fully liable for recoveries, even if it has not been the final recipient of the undue amounts. At beneficiary termination or after final payment, recoveries will be made directly against the beneficiaries concerned. Beneficiaries will be fully liable for repaying the debts of their affiliated entities. In case of enforced recoveries (see Article 22.4): - the beneficiaries will be jointly and severally liable for repaying debts of another beneficiary under the Agreement (including late-payment interest), if required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4) - affiliated entities will be held liable for repaying debts of their beneficiaries under the Agreement (including late-payment interest), if required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.4). 22.3 Amounts due 22.3.1 Prefinancing payments The aim of the prefinancing is to provide the beneficiaries with a float. It remains the property of the EU until the final payment. For initial prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). For additional prefinancings (if any), the amount due, schedule and modalities are also set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). However, if the statement on the use of the previous prefinancing payment shows that less than 70% was used, the amount set out in the Data Sheet will be reduced by the difference between the 70% threshold and the amount used. 45 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Prefinancing payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). 22.3.2 Amount due at beneficiary termination — Recovery In case of beneficiary termination, the granting authority will determine the provisional amount due for the beneficiary concerned. Payments (if any) will be made with the next interim or final payment. The amount due will be calculated in the following step: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of the beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary. The balance is then calculated by deducting the payments received (if any; see report on the distribution of payments in Article 32), from the total accepted EU contribution: {total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary minus {prefinancing and interim payments received (if any)}}. If the balance is positive, the amount will be included in the next interim or final payment to the consortium. If the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount due, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered and ask this amount to be paid to the coordinator (confirmation letter). 46 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The amounts will later on also be taken into account for the next interim or final payment. 22.3.3 Interim payments Interim payments reimburse the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action during the reporting periods (if any). Interim payments (if any) will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). Payment is subject to the approval of the periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content. The interim payment will be calculated by the granting authority in the following steps: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for the reporting period, by first calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs, and CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions from beneficiary termination (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’. Step 2 — Limit to the interim payment ceiling The resulting amount is then capped to ensure that the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments (if any) does not exceed the interim payment ceiling set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). Interim payments (or parts of them) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). 22.3.4 Final payment — Final grant amount — Revenues and Profit — Recovery The final payment (payment of the balance) reimburses the remaining part of the eligible costs and contributions claimed for the implementation of the action (if any). The final payment will be made in accordance with the schedule and modalities set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2). 47 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Payment is subject to the approval of the final periodic report. Its approval does not imply recognition of compliance, authenticity, completeness or correctness of its content. The final grant amount for the action will be calculated in the following steps: Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule Step 1 — Calculation of the total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘accepted EU contribution’ for the action for all reporting periods, by calculating the ‘maximum EU contribution to costs’ (applying the funding rate to the total accepted costs of each beneficiary), taking into account requests for a lower contribution to costs, CFS threshold cappings (if any; see Article 24.5) and adding the contributions (accepted unit, flat-rate or lump sum contributions and financing not linked to costs, if any). After that, the granting authority will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting amount is the ‘total accepted EU contribution’. Step 2 — Limit to the maximum grant amount If the resulting amount is higher than the maximum grant amount set out in Article 5.2, it will be limited to the latter. Step 3 — Reduction due to the no-profit rule If the no-profit rule is provided for in the Data Sheet (see Point 4.2), the grant must not produce a profit (i.e. surplus of the amount obtained following Step 2 plus the action’s revenues, over the eligible costs and contributions approved by the granting authority). ‘Revenue’ is all income generated by the action, during its duration (see Article 4), for beneficiaries that are profit legal entities. If there is a profit, it will be deducted in proportion to the final rate of reimbursement of the eligible costs approved by the granting authority (as compared to the amount calculated following Steps 1 and 2 minus the contributions). The balance (final payment) is then calculated by deducting the total amount of prefinancing and interim payments already made (if any), from the final grant amount: {final grant amount minus {prefinancing and interim payments made (if any)}}. If the balance is positive, it will be paid to the coordinator. The final payment (or part of it) may be offset (without the beneficiaries’ consent) against amounts owed by a beneficiary to the granting authority — up to the amount due to that beneficiary. 48 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, offsetting may also be done against amounts owed to other Commission services or executive agencies. Payments will not be made if the payment deadline or payments are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30). If the balance is negative, it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator: - formally notifying the intention to recover, the final grant amount, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered (confirmation letter), together with a debit note with the terms and date for payment. If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4. 22.3.5 Audit implementation after final payment — Revised final grant amount — Recovery If — after the final payment (in particular, after checks, reviews, audits or investigations; see Article 25) — the granting authority rejects costs or contributions (see Article 27) or reduces the grant (see Article 28), it will calculate the revised final grant amount for the beneficiary concerned. The beneficiary revised final grant amount will be calculated in the following step: Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution Step 1 — Calculation of the revised total accepted EU contribution The granting authority will first calculate the ‘revised accepted EU contribution’ for the beneficiary, by calculating the ‘revised accepted costs’ and ‘revised accepted contributions’. After that, it will take into account grant reductions (if any). The resulting ‘revised total accepted EU contribution’ is the beneficiary revised final grant amount. If the revised final grant amount is lower than the beneficiary’s final grant amount (i.e. its share in the final grant amount for the action), it will be recovered in accordance with the following procedure: The beneficiary final grant amount (i.e. share in the final grant amount for the action) is calculated as follows: {{total accepted EU contribution for the beneficiary divided by total accepted EU contribution for the action} multiplied by 49 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 final grant amount for the action}. The granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to recover, the amount to be recovered and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If no observations are submitted (or the granting authority decides to pursue recovery despite the observations it has received), it will confirm the amount to be recovered (confirmation letter), together with a debit note with the terms and the date for payment. Recoveries against affiliated entities (if any) will be handled through their beneficiaries. If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the granting authority will enforce recovery in accordance with Article 22.4. 22.4 Enforced recovery If payment is not made by the date specified in the debit note, the amount due will be recovered: (a) by offsetting the amount — without the coordinator or beneficiary’s consent — against any amounts owed to the coordinator or beneficiary by the granting authority. In exceptional circumstances, to safeguard the EU financial interests, the amount may be offset before the payment date specified in the debit note. For grants where the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, debts may also be offset against amounts owed by other Commission services or executive agencies. (b) by drawing on the financial guarantee(s) (if any) (c) by holding other beneficiaries jointly and severally liable (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 4.4) (d) by holding affiliated entities jointly and severally liable (if any, see Data Sheet, Point 4.4) (e) by taking legal action (see Article 43) or, provided that the granting authority is the European Commission or an EU executive agency, by adopting an enforceable decision under Article 299 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 100(2) of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. The amount to be recovered will be increased by late-payment interest at the rate set out in Article 22.5, from the day following the payment date in the debit note, up to and including the date the full payment is received. Partial payments will be first credited against expenses, charges and late-payment interest and then against the principal. Bank charges incurred in the recovery process will be borne by the beneficiary, unless Directive 2015/236620 applies. 20 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment 50 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency, enforced recovery by offsetting or enforceable decision will be done by the services of the European Commission (see also Article 43). 22.5 Consequences of non-compliance 22.5.1 If the granting authority does not pay within the payment deadlines (see above), the beneficiaries are entitled to late-payment interest at the rate applied by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations in euros (‘reference rate’), plus the rate specified in the Data Sheet (Point 4.2). The reference rate is the rate in force on the first day of the month in which the payment deadline expires, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the European Union. If the late-payment interest is lower than or equal to EUR 200, it will be paid to the coordinator only on request submitted within two months of receiving the late payment. Late-payment interest is not due if all beneficiaries are EU Member States (including regional and local government authorities or other public bodies acting on behalf of a Member State for the purpose of this Agreement). If payments or the payment deadline are suspended (see Articles 29 and 30), payment will not be considered as late. Late-payment interest covers the period running from the day following the due date for payment (see above), up to and including the date of payment. Late-payment interest is not considered for the purposes of calculating the final grant amount. 22.5.2 If the coordinator breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 28) and the grant or the coordinator may be terminated (see Article 32). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 23 — GUARANTEES 23.1 Prefinancing guarantee If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2), the beneficiaries must provide (one or more) prefinancing guarantee(s) in accordance with the timing and the amounts set out in the Data Sheet. The coordinator must submit them to the granting authority in due time before the prefinancing they are linked to. The guarantees must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal and fulfil the following conditions: (a) be provided by a bank or approved financial institution established in the EU or — if requested by the coordinator and accepted by the granting authority — by a third party or a bank or financial institution established outside the EU offering equivalent security services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (OJ L 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35). 51 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 (b) the guarantor stands as first-call guarantor and does not require the granting authority to first have recourse against the principal debtor (i.e. the beneficiary concerned) and (c) remain explicitly in force until the final payment and, if the final payment takes the form of a recovery, until five months after the debit note is notified to a beneficiary. They will be released within the following month. 23.2 Consequences of non-compliance If the beneficiaries breach their obligation to provide the prefinancing guarantee, the prefinancing will not be paid. Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 24 — CERTIFICATES 24.1 Operational verification report (OVR) Not applicable 24.2 Certificate on the financial statements (CFS) If required by the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.3), the beneficiaries must provide certificates on their financial statements (CFS), in accordance with the schedule, threshold and conditions set out in the Data Sheet. The coordinator must submit them as part of the periodic report (see Article 21). The certificates must be drawn up using the template published on the Portal, cover the costs declared on the basis of actual costs and costs according to usual cost accounting practices (if any), and fulfil the following conditions: (a) be provided by a qualified approved external auditor which is independent and complies with Directive 2006/43/EC21 (or for public bodies: by a competent independent public officer) (b) the verification must be carried out according to the highest professional standards to ensure that the financial statements comply with the provisions under the Agreement and that the costs declared are eligible. The certificates will not affect the granting authority's right to carry out its own checks, reviews or audits, nor preclude the European Court of Auditors (ECA), the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) or the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) from using their prerogatives for audits and investigations under the Agreement (see Article 25). If the costs (or a part of them) were already audited by the granting authority, these costs do not need to be covered by the certificate and will not be counted for calculating the threshold (if any). 24.3 Certificate on the compliance of usual cost accounting practices (CoMUC) 21 Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts or similar national regulations (OJ L 157, 9.6.2006, p. 87). 52 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Not applicable 24.4 Systems and process audit (SPA) Not applicable 24.5 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary does not submit a certificate on the financial statements (CFS) or the certificate is rejected, the accepted EU contribution to costs will be capped to reflect the CFS threshold. If a beneficiary breaches any of its other obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5. ARTICLE 25 — CHECKS, REVIEWS, AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS — EXTENSION OF FINDINGS 25.1 Granting authority checks, reviews and audits 25.1.1 Internal checks The granting authority may — during the action or afterwards — check the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement, including assessing costs and contributions, deliverables and reports. 25.1.2 Project reviews The granting authority may carry out reviews on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement (general project reviews or specific issues reviews). Such project reviews may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent, outside experts. If it uses outside experts, the coordinator or beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information and data in addition to deliverables and reports already submitted (including information on the use of resources). The granting authority may request beneficiaries to provide such information to it directly. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may be requested to participate in meetings, including with the outside experts. For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including to the outside experts) and must ensure that information requested is readily available. 53 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. On the basis of the review findings, a project review report will be drawn up. The granting authority will formally notify the project review report to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations. Project reviews (including project review reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 25.1.3 Audits The granting authority may carry out audits on the proper implementation of the action and compliance with the obligations under the Agreement. Such audits may be started during the implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the beneficiary concerned and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. The granting authority may use its own audit service, delegate audits to a centralised service or use external audit firms. If it uses an external firm, the beneficiary concerned will be informed and have the right to object on grounds of commercial confidentiality or conflict of interest. The beneficiary concerned must cooperate diligently and provide — within the deadline requested — any information (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data) to verify compliance with the Agreement. Sensitive information and documents will be treated in accordance with Article 13. For on-the-spot visits, the beneficiary concerned must allow access to sites and premises (including for the external audit firm) and must ensure that information requested is readily available. Information provided must be accurate, precise and complete and in the format requested, including electronic format. On the basis of the audit findings, a draft audit report will be drawn up. The auditors will formally notify the draft audit report to the beneficiary concerned, which has 30 days from receiving notification to make observations (contradictory audit procedure). The final audit report will take into account observations by the beneficiary concerned and will be formally notified to them. Audits (including audit reports) will be in the language of the Agreement, unless otherwise agreed with the granting authority (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2). 25.2 European Commission checks, reviews and audits in grants of other granting authorities Where the granting authority is not the European Commission, the latter has the same rights of checks, reviews and audits as the granting authority. 54 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 25.3 Access to records for assessing simplified forms of funding The beneficiaries must give the European Commission access to their statutory records for the periodic assessment of simplified forms of funding which are used in EU programmes. 25.4 OLAF, EPPO and ECA audits and investigations The following bodies may also carry out checks, reviews, audits and investigations — during the action or afterwards: - the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) under Regulations No 883/201322 and No 2185/9623 - the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) under Regulation 2017/1939 - the European Court of Auditors (ECA) under Article 287 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU) and Article 257 of EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046. If requested by these bodies, the beneficiary concerned must provide full, accurate and complete information in the format requested (including complete accounts, individual salary statements or other personal data, including in electronic format) and allow access to sites and premises for on-the-spot visits or inspections — as provided for under these Regulations. To this end, the beneficiary concerned must keep all relevant information relating to the action, at least until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (Point 6) and, in any case, until any ongoing checks, reviews, audits, investigations, litigation or other pursuits of claims have been concluded. 25.5 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations — Extension of results of reviews, audits or investigations 25.5.1 Consequences of checks, reviews, audits and investigations in this grant Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations carried out in the context of this grant may lead to rejections (see Article 27), grant reduction (see Article 28) or other measures described in Chapter 5. Rejections or grant reductions after the final payment will lead to a revised final grant amount (see Article 22). Findings in checks, reviews, audits or investigations during the action implementation may lead to a request for amendment (see Article 39), to change the description of the action set out in Annex 1. Checks, reviews, audits or investigations that find systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations in any EU grant may also lead to consequences in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions (‘extension to other grants’). 22 Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 September 2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (Euratom) No 1074/1999 (OJ L 248, 18/09/2013, p. 1). 23 Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11 November 1996 concerning on-the-spot checks and inspections carried out by the Commission in order to protect the European Communities' financial interests against fraud and other irregularities (OJ L 292, 15/11/1996, p. 2). 55 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Moreover, findings arising from an OLAF or EPPO investigation may lead to criminal prosecution under national law. 25.5.2 Extension from other grants Results of checks, reviews, audits or investigations in other grants may be extended to this grant, if: (a) the beneficiary concerned is found, in other EU grants awarded under similar conditions, to have committed systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant and (b) those findings are formally notified to the beneficiary concerned — together with the list of grants affected by the findings — within the time-limit for audits set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned of the intention to extend the findings and the list of grants affected. If the extension concerns rejections of costs or contributions: the notification will include: (a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings (b) the request to submit revised financial statements for all grants affected (c) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors, to calculate the amounts to be rejected, if the beneficiary concerned: (i) considers that the submission of revised financial statements is not possible or practicable or (ii) does not submit revised financial statements. If the extension concerns grant reductions: the notification will include: (a) an invitation to submit observations on the list of grants affected by the findings and (b) the correction rate for extrapolation, established on the basis of the systemic or recurrent errors and the principle of proportionality. The beneficiary concerned has 60 days from receiving notification to submit observations, revised financial statements or to propose a duly substantiated alternative correction method/rate. On the basis of this, the granting authority will analyse the impact and decide on the implementation (i.e. start rejection or grant reduction procedures, either on the basis of the revised financial statements or the announced/alternative method/rate or a mix of those; see Articles 27 and 28). 25.6 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, costs or contributions insufficiently substantiated will be ineligible (see Article 6) and will be rejected (see Article 27), and the grant may be reduced (see Article 28). Such breaches may also lead to other measures described in Chapter 5. 56 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 ARTICLE 26 — IMPACT EVALUATIONS 26.1 Impact evaluation The granting authority may carry out impact evaluations of the action, measured against the objectives and indicators of the EU programme funding the grant. Such evaluations may be started during implementation of the action and until the time-limit set out in the Data Sheet (see Point 6). They will be formally notified to the coordinator or beneficiaries and will be considered to start on the date of the notification. If needed, the granting authority may be assisted by independent outside experts. The coordinator or beneficiaries must provide any information relevant to evaluate the impact of the action, including information in electronic format. 26.2 Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the granting authority may apply the measures described in Chapter 5. CHAPTER 5 CONSEQUENCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE SECTION 1 REJECTIONS AND GRANT REDUCTION ARTICLE 27 — REJECTION OF COSTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS 27.1 Conditions The granting authority will — at beneficiary termination, interim payment, final payment or afterwards — reject any costs or contributions which are ineligible (see Article 6), in particular following checks, reviews, audits or investigations (see Article 25). The rejection may also be based on the extension of findings from other grants to this grant (see Article 25). Ineligible costs or contributions will be rejected. 27.2 Procedure If the rejection does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the rejection, the amounts and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the rejection (payment review procedure). If the rejection leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22. 27.3 Effects 57 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 If the granting authority rejects costs or contributions, it will deduct them from the costs or contributions declared and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22). ARTICLE 28 — GRANT REDUCTION 28.1 Conditions The granting authority may — at beneficiary termination, final payment or afterwards — reduce the grant for a beneficiary, if: (a) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) the beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (see Article 25). The amount of the reduction will be calculated for each beneficiary concerned and proportionate to the seriousness and the duration of the errors, irregularities or fraud or breach of obligations, by applying an individual reduction rate to their accepted EU contribution. 28.2 Procedure If the grant reduction does not lead to a recovery, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator or beneficiary concerned of the reduction, the amount to be reduced and the reasons why. The coordinator or beneficiary concerned may — within 30 days of receiving notification — submit observations if it disagrees with the reduction (payment review procedure). If the grant reduction leads to a recovery, the granting authority will follow the contradictory procedure with pre-information letter set out in Article 22. 28.3 Effects If the granting authority reduces the grant, it will deduct the reduction and then calculate the amount due (and, if needed, make a recovery; see Article 22). SECTION 2 SUSPENSION AND TERMINATION ARTICLE 29 — PAYMENT DEADLINE SUSPENSION 29.1 Conditions 58 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend the payment deadline if a payment cannot be processed because: (a) the required report (see Article 21) has not been submitted or is not complete or additional information is needed (b) there are doubts about the amount to be paid (e.g. ongoing audit extension procedure, queries about eligibility, need for a grant reduction, etc.) and additional checks, reviews, audits or investigations are necessary, or (c) there are other issues affecting the EU financial interests. 29.2 Procedure The granting authority will formally notify the coordinator of the suspension and the reasons why. The suspension will take effect the day the notification is sent. If the conditions for suspending the payment deadline are no longer met, the suspension will be lifted — and the remaining time to pay (see Data Sheet, Point 4.2) will resume. If the suspension exceeds two months, the coordinator may request the granting authority to confirm if the suspension will continue. If the payment deadline has been suspended due to the non-compliance of the report and the revised report is not submitted (or was submitted but is also rejected), the granting authority may also terminate the grant or the participation of the coordinator (see Article 32). ARTICLE 30 — PAYMENT SUSPENSION 30.1 Conditions The granting authority may — at any moment — suspend payments, in whole or in part for one or more beneficiaries, if: (a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant. If payments are suspended for one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will make partial 59 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 payment(s) for the part(s) not suspended. If suspension concerns the final payment, the payment (or recovery) of the remaining amount after suspension is lifted will be considered to be the payment that closes the action. 30.2 Procedure Before suspending payments, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the beneficiary concerned: - formally notifying the intention to suspend payments and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. At the end of the suspension procedure, the granting authority will also inform the coordinator. The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent. If the conditions for resuming payments are met, the suspension will be lifted. The granting authority will formally notify the beneficiary concerned (and the coordinator) and set the suspension end date. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid to the beneficiaries concerned. For interim payments, the periodic reports for all reporting periods except the last one (see Article 21) must not contain any financial statements from the beneficiary concerned (or its affiliated entities). The coordinator must include them in the next periodic report after the suspension is lifted or — if suspension is not lifted before the end of the action — in the last periodic report. ARTICLE 31 — GRANT AGREEMENT SUSPENSION 31.1 Consortium-requested GA suspension 31.1.1 Conditions and procedure The beneficiaries may request the suspension of the grant or any part of it, if exceptional circumstances — in particular force majeure (see Article 35) — make implementation impossible or excessively difficult. The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the date the suspension takes effect; this date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request and - the expected date of resumption. The suspension will take effect on the day specified in the amendment. Once circumstances allow for implementation to resume, the coordinator must immediately request 60 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 another amendment of the Agreement to set the suspension end date, the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the amendment. This date may be before the date of the submission of the amendment request. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during grant suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3). 31.2 EU-initiated GA suspension 31.2.1 Conditions The granting authority may suspend the grant or any part of it, if: (a) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed or is suspected of having committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.), or (b) a beneficiary (or a person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (c) other: (i) linked action issues: not applicable (ii) additional GA suspension grounds: not applicable. 31.2.2 Procedure Before suspending the grant, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator: - formally notifying the intention to suspend the grant and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the suspension (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. The suspension will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification). 61 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Once the conditions for resuming implementation of the action are met, the granting authority will formally notify the coordinator a lifting of suspension letter, in which it will set the suspension end date and invite the coordinator to request an amendment of the Agreement to set the resumption date (one day after suspension end date), extend the duration and make other changes necessary to adapt the action to the new situation (see Article 39) — unless the grant has been terminated (see Article 32). The suspension will be lifted with effect from the suspension end date set out in the lifting of suspension letter. This date may be before the date on which the letter is sent. During the suspension, no prefinancing will be paid. Costs incurred or contributions for activities implemented during suspension are not eligible (see Article 6.3). The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to suspension by the granting authority (see Article 33). Grant suspension does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant or a beneficiary (see Article 32) or reduce the grant (see Article 28). ARTICLE 32 — GRANT AGREEMENT OR BENEFICIARY TERMINATION 32.1 Consortium-requested GA termination 32.1.1 Conditions and procedure The beneficiaries may request the termination of the grant. The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the date the consortium ends work on the action (‘end of work date’) and - the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request. The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment. If no reasons are given or if the granting authority considers the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the grant terminated improperly. 32.1.2 Effects The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the open reporting period until termination). The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible. If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). 62 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 Improper termination may lead to a grant reduction (see Article 28). After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. 32.2 Consortium-requested beneficiary termination 32.2.1 Conditions and procedure The coordinator may request the termination of the participation of one or more beneficiaries, on request of the beneficiary concerned or on behalf of the other beneficiaries. The coordinator must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with: - the reasons why - the opinion of the beneficiary concerned (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing) - the date the beneficiary ends work on the action (‘end of work date’) - the date the termination takes effect (‘termination date’); this date must be after the date of the submission of the amendment request. If the termination concerns the coordinator and is done without its agreement, the amendment request must be submitted by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the consortium). The termination will take effect on the termination date specified in the amendment. If no information is given or if the granting authority considers that the reasons do not justify termination, it may consider the beneficiary to have been terminated improperly. 32.2.2 Effects The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit: (i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned (ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) (iii) a second request for amendment (see Article 39) with other amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.). The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before the end of work date (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after the end of work are not eligible. 63 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21). If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that: - the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that - the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator. If the second request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39). If the second request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32). Improper termination may lead to a reduction of the grant (see Article 31) or grant termination (see Article 32). After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. 32.3 EU-initiated GA or beneficiary termination 32.3.1 Conditions The granting authority may terminate the grant or the participation of one or more beneficiaries, if: (a) one or more beneficiaries do not accede to the Agreement (see Article 40) (b) a change to the action or the legal, financial, technical, organisational or ownership situation of a beneficiary is likely to substantially affect the implementation of the action or calls into question the decision to award the grant (including changes linked to one of the exclusion grounds listed in the declaration of honour) (c) following termination of one or more beneficiaries, the necessary changes to the Agreement (and their impact on the action) would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants (d) implementation of the action has become impossible or the changes necessary for its continuation would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants (e) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is subject to bankruptcy 64 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 proceedings or similar (including insolvency, winding-up, administration by a liquidator or court, arrangement with creditors, suspension of business activities, etc.) (f) a beneficiary (or person with unlimited liability for its debts) is in breach of social security or tax obligations (g) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has been found guilty of grave professional misconduct (h) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed fraud, corruption, or is involved in a criminal organisation, money laundering, terrorism-related crimes (including terrorism financing), child labour or human trafficking (i) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) was created under a different jurisdiction with the intent to circumvent fiscal, social or other legal obligations in the country of origin (or created another entity with this purpose) (j) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed: (i) substantial errors, irregularities or fraud or (ii) serious breach of obligations under this Agreement or during its award (including improper implementation of the action, non-compliance with the call conditions, submission of false information, failure to provide required information, breach of ethics or security rules (if applicable), etc.) (k) a beneficiary (or person having powers of representation, decision-making or control, or person essential for the award/implementation of the grant) has committed — in other EU grants awarded to it under similar conditions — systemic or recurrent errors, irregularities, fraud or serious breach of obligations that have a material impact on this grant (extension of findings from other grants to this grant; see Article 25) (l) despite a specific request by the granting authority, a beneficiary does not request — through the coordinator — an amendment to the Agreement to end the participation of one of its affiliated entities or associated partners that is in one of the situations under points (d), (f), (e), (g), (h), (i) or (j) and to reallocate its tasks, or (m) other: (i) linked action issues: not applicable (ii) additional GA termination grounds: not applicable. 32.3.2 Procedure Before terminating the grant or participation of one or more beneficiaries, the granting authority will send a pre-information letter to the coordinator or beneficiary concerned: 65 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 - formally notifying the intention to terminate and the reasons why and - requesting observations within 30 days of receiving notification. If the granting authority does not receive observations or decides to pursue the procedure despite the observations it has received, it will confirm the termination and the date it will take effect (confirmation letter). Otherwise, it will formally notify that the procedure is discontinued. For beneficiary terminations, the granting authority will — at the end of the procedure — also inform the coordinator. The termination will take effect the day after the confirmation notification is sent (or on a later date specified in the notification; ‘termination date’). 32.3.3 Effects (a) for GA termination: The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit a periodic report (for the last open reporting period until termination). The granting authority will calculate the final grant amount and final payment on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible. If the grant is terminated for breach of the obligation to submit reports, the coordinator may not submit any report after termination. If the granting authority does not receive the report within the deadline, only costs and contributions which are included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). Termination does not affect the granting authority’s right to reduce the grant (see Article 28) or to impose administrative sanctions (see Article 34). The beneficiaries may not claim damages due to termination by the granting authority (see Article 33). After termination, the beneficiaries’ obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. (b) for beneficiary termination: The coordinator must — within 60 days from when termination takes effect — submit: (i) a report on the distribution of payments to the beneficiary concerned (ii) a termination report from the beneficiary concerned, for the open reporting period until termination, containing an overview of the progress of the work, the financial 66 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 statement, the explanation on the use of resources, and, if applicable, the certificate on the financial statement (CFS; see Articles 21 and 24.2 and Data Sheet, Point 4.3) (iii) a request for amendment (see Article 39) with any amendments needed (e.g. reallocation of the tasks and the estimated budget of the terminated beneficiary; addition of a new beneficiary to replace the terminated beneficiary; change of coordinator, etc.). The granting authority will calculate the amount due to the beneficiary on the basis of the report submitted and taking into account the costs incurred and contributions for activities implemented before termination takes effect (see Article 22). Costs relating to contracts due for execution only after termination are not eligible. The information in the termination report must also be included in the periodic report for the next reporting period (see Article 21). If the granting authority does not receive the termination report within the deadline, only costs and contributions included in an approved periodic report will be taken into account (no costs/ contributions if no periodic report was ever approved). If the granting authority does not receive the report on the distribution of payments within the deadline, it will consider that: - the coordinator did not distribute any payment to the beneficiary concerned and that - the beneficiary concerned must not repay any amount to the coordinator. If the request for amendment is accepted by the granting authority, the Agreement is amended to introduce the necessary changes (see Article 39). If the request for amendment is rejected by the granting authority (because it calls into question the decision awarding the grant or breaches the principle of equal treatment of applicants), the grant may be terminated (see Article 32). After termination, the concerned beneficiary’s obligations (in particular Articles 13 (confidentiality and security), 16 (IPR), 17 (communication, dissemination and visibility), 21 (reporting), 25 (checks, reviews, audits and investigations), 26 (impact evaluation), 27 (rejections), 28 (grant reduction) and 42 (assignment of claims)) continue to apply. SECTION 3 OTHER CONSEQUENCES: DAMAGES AND ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS ARTICLE 33 — DAMAGES 33.1 Liability of the granting authority The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused to the beneficiaries or to third parties as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement, including for gross negligence. The granting authority cannot be held liable for any damage caused by any of the beneficiaries or other participants involved in the action, as a consequence of the implementation of the Agreement. 67 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 33.2 Liability of the beneficiaries The beneficiaries must compensate the granting authority for any damage it sustains as a result of the implementation of the action or because the action was not implemented in full compliance with the Agreement, provided that it was caused by gross negligence or wilful act. The liability does not extend to indirect or consequential losses or similar damage (such as loss of profit, loss of revenue or loss of contracts), provided such damage was not caused by wilful act or by a breach of confidentiality. ARTICLE 34 — ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS AND OTHER MEASURES Nothing in this Agreement may be construed as preventing the adoption of administrative sanctions (i.e. exclusion from EU award procedures and/or financial penalties) or other public law measures, in addition or as an alternative to the contractual measures provided under this Agreement (see, for instance, Articles 135 to 145 EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046 and Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation 2988/9524). SECTION 4 FORCE MAJEURE ARTICLE 35 — FORCE MAJEURE A party prevented by force majeure from fulfilling its obligations under the Agreement cannot be considered in breach of them. ‘Force majeure’ means any situation or event that: - prevents either party from fulfilling their obligations under the Agreement, - was unforeseeable, exceptional situation and beyond the parties’ control, - was not due to error or negligence on their part (or on the part of other participants involved in the action), and - proves to be inevitable in spite of exercising all due diligence. Any situation constituting force majeure must be formally notified to the other party without delay, stating the nature, likely duration and foreseeable effects. The parties must immediately take all the necessary steps to limit any damage due to force majeure and do their best to resume implementation of the action as soon as possible. CHAPTER 6 FINAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE 36 — COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES 36.1 Forms and means of communication — Electronic management 24 Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities financial interests (OJ L 312, 23.12.1995, p. 1). 68 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 EU grants are managed fully electronically through the EU Funding & Tenders Portal (‘Portal’). All communications must be made electronically through the Portal, in accordance with the Portal Terms and Conditions and using the forms and templates provided there (except if explicitly instructed otherwise by the granting authority). Communications must be made in writing and clearly identify the grant agreement (project number and acronym). Communications must be made by persons authorised according to the Portal Terms and Conditions. For naming the authorised persons, each beneficiary must have designated — before the signature of this Agreement — a ‘legal entity appointed representative (LEAR)’. The role and tasks of the LEAR are stipulated in their appointment letter (see Portal Terms and Conditions). If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, instructions will be given on the Portal. 36.2 Date of communication The sending date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time of sending, as indicated by the time logs. The receiving date for communications made through the Portal will be the date and time the communication is accessed, as indicated by the time logs. Formal notifications that have not been accessed within 10 days after sending, will be considered to have been accessed (see Portal Terms and Conditions). If a communication is exceptionally made on paper (by e-mail or postal service), general principles apply (i.e. date of sending/receipt). Formal notifications by registered post with proof of delivery will be considered to have been received either on the delivery date registered by the postal service or the deadline for collection at the post office. If the electronic exchange system is temporarily unavailable, the sending party cannot be considered in breach of its obligation to send a communication within a specified deadline. 36.3 Addresses for communication The Portal can be accessed via the Europa website. The address for paper communications to the granting authority (if exceptionally allowed) is the official mailing address indicated on its website. For beneficiaries, it is the legal address specified in the Portal Participant Register. ARTICLE 37 — INTERPRETATION OF THE AGREEMENT The provisions in the Data Sheet take precedence over the rest of the Terms and Conditions of the Agreement. Annex 5 takes precedence over the Terms and Conditions; the Terms and Conditions take precedence over the Annexes other than Annex 5. Annex 2 takes precedence over Annex 1. 69 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 ARTICLE 38 — CALCULATION OF PERIODS AND DEADLINES In accordance with Regulation No 1182/7125, periods expressed in days, months or years are calculated from the moment the triggering event occurs. The day during which that event occurs is not considered as falling within the period. ‘Days’ means calendar days, not working days. ARTICLE 39 — AMENDMENTS 39.1 Conditions The Agreement may be amended, unless the amendment entails changes to the Agreement which would call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants. Amendments may be requested by any of the parties. 39.2 Procedure The party requesting an amendment must submit a request for amendment signed directly in the Portal Amendment tool. The coordinator submits and receives requests for amendment on behalf of the beneficiaries (see Annex 3). If a change of coordinator is requested without its agreement, the submission must be done by another beneficiary (acting on behalf of the other beneficiaries). The request for amendment must include: - the reasons why - the appropriate supporting documents and - for a change of coordinator without its agreement: the opinion of the coordinator (or proof that this opinion has been requested in writing). The granting authority may request additional information. If the party receiving the request agrees, it must sign the amendment in the tool within 45 days of receiving notification (or any additional information the granting authority has requested). If it does not agree, it must formally notify its disagreement within the same deadline. The deadline may be extended, if necessary for the assessment of the request. If no notification is received within the deadline, the request is considered to have been rejected. An amendment enters into force on the day of the signature of the receiving party. An amendment takes effect on the date of entry into force or other date specified in the amendment. 25 Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time-limits (OJ L 124, 8/6/1971, p. 1). 70 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 ARTICLE 40 — ACCESSION AND ADDITION OF NEW BENEFICIARIES 40.1 Accession of the beneficiaries mentioned in the Preamble The beneficiaries which are not coordinator must accede to the grant by signing the accession form (see Annex 3) directly in the Portal Grant Preparation tool, within 30 days after the entry into force of the Agreement (see Article 44). They will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of its entry into force (see Article 44). If a beneficiary does not accede to the grant within the above deadline, the coordinator must — within 30 days — request an amendment (see Article 39) to terminate the beneficiary and make any changes necessary to ensure proper implementation of the action. This does not affect the granting authority’s right to terminate the grant (see Article 32). 40.2 Addition of new beneficiaries In justified cases, the beneficiaries may request the addition of a new beneficiary. For this purpose, the coordinator must submit a request for amendment in accordance with Article 39. It must include an accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool. New beneficiaries will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of their accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3). Additions are also possible in mono-beneficiary grants. ARTICLE 41 — TRANSFER OF THE AGREEMENT In justified cases, the beneficiary of a mono-beneficiary grant may request the transfer of the grant to a new beneficiary, provided that this would not call into question the decision awarding the grant or breach the principle of equal treatment of applicants. The beneficiary must submit a request for amendment (see Article 39), with - the reasons why - the accession form (see Annex 3) signed by the new beneficiary directly in the Portal Amendment tool and - additional supporting documents (if required by the granting authority). The new beneficiary will assume the rights and obligations under the Agreement with effect from the date of accession specified in the accession form (see Annex 3). ARTICLE 42 — ASSIGNMENTS OF CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT AGAINST THE GRANTING AUTHORITY The beneficiaries may not assign any of their claims for payment against the granting authority to 71 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 any third party, except if expressly approved in writing by the granting authority on the basis of a reasoned, written request by the coordinator (on behalf of the beneficiary concerned). If the granting authority has not accepted the assignment or if the terms of it are not observed, the assignment will have no effect on it. In no circumstances will an assignment release the beneficiaries from their obligations towards the granting authority. ARTICLE 43 — APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES 43.1 Applicable law The Agreement is governed by the applicable EU law, supplemented if necessary by the law of Belgium. Special rules may apply for beneficiaries which are international organisations (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5). 43.2 Dispute settlement If a dispute concerns the interpretation, application or validity of the Agreement, the parties must bring action before the EU General Court — or, on appeal, the EU Court of Justice — under Article 272 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU). For non-EU beneficiaries (if any), such disputes must be brought before the courts of Brussels, Belgium — unless an international agreement provides for the enforceability of EU court judgements. For beneficiaries with arbitration as special dispute settlement forum (if any; see Data Sheet, Point 5), the dispute will — in the absence of an amicable settlement — be settled in accordance with the Rules for Arbitration published on the Portal. If a dispute concerns administrative sanctions, offsetting or an enforceable decision under Article 299 TFEU (see Articles 22 and 34), the beneficiaries must bring action before the General Court — or, on appeal, the Court of Justice — under Article 263 TFEU. For grants where the granting authority is an EU executive agency (see Preamble), actions against offsetting and enforceable decisions must be brought against the European Commission (not against the granting authority; see also Article 22). ARTICLE 44 — ENTRY INTO FORCE The Agreement will enter into force on the day of signature by the granting authority or the coordinator, depending on which is later. 72 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA EU4H Ref. Associated with document MGAAres(2024)5119241 — Multi & Mono:-v1.1 15/07/2024 SIGNATURES For the coordinator For the granting authority [--TGSMark#signature-881163036_75_210--] [--TGSMark#signature-service_75_210--] Sandra Pūce with ECAS id n00g24tc signed in the Participant Portal Signed by Florina TELEA with ECAS id teleafa as an authorised on 16/07/2024 at 09:40:25 (transaction id SigId-4023-V4erK3AJ7YN representative on 16-07-2024 10:28:56 (transaction id SigId-5193-N XrtAXmipXoMI33svjdhxpNOBCB5zp0VJfhIahzgBG2fnkBjhNd3wzfIe zI3LtrduKSuSNWBIZEfI2dYYfx4zSTqSd0TjcvaffmUiM3ZLYzxvev1WK uy8mUdXcHRWPFE9IBTS0-rS0vSrmBGYCMjDQyPL1qIq-zV6PQqjJm WOdQwCvymslVKvTZKWby75rU1H8tG-rS0vSrmBGYCMjDQyPL1qIq- 77kXLZ9mqxEBgrPOGq7BzGevU31k09lRlbiMXYumpgx15n81g4zHa ygK0zLVIQjzuZkMfERwztK8b67HKr8sRplqTWAitFUXOPVCwMNdi3Tu 4aWO153nH80b1EyzG9T9Sdn8i). Timestamp by third party at cNlI8OEWxnAuzTRxVezwt8NDTguVml7r) 2024.07.16 09:40:32 CEST 2024.07.16 10:29:03 CEST 73 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 ANNEX 1 EU4Health Programme (EU4H) Description of the action (DoA) Part A Part B Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION (PART A) COVER PAGE Part A of the Description of the Action (DoA) must be completed directly on the Portal Grant Preparation screens. PROJECT Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Enter the info. Project number: 101162928 Project name: Mental Health Together Project acronym: MENTOR Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Topic: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA-04 Type of action: EU4H-PJG Service: HADEA/A/01 Project starting date: fixed date: 1 September 2024 Project duration: 36 months TABLE OF CONTENTS Project summary ......................................................................................................................................................3 List of participants .................................................................................................................................................. 3 List of work packages .............................................................................................................................................6 Staff effort ............................................................................................................................................................. 14 List of deliverables ................................................................................................................................................16 List of milestones (outputs/outcomes) .................................................................................................................. 31 List of critical risks ............................................................................................................................................... 34 2 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 PROJECT SUMMARY Project summary Grant Preparation (General Information screen) — Provide an overall description of your project (including context and overall objectives, planned activities and main achievements, and expected results and impacts (on target groups, change procedures, capacities, innovation etc)). This summary should give readers a clear idea of what your project is about. Use the project summary from your proposal. Following the EU Communication on a Comprehensive Approach to mental health, MENTOR contributes to reduce the burden of mental ill-health and promote good mental health and well-being, planning activities addressed both to the general population and to people suffering from mental issues to have an impact at the policy and practice level in Europe in several ways. Thus, MENTOR aims at promoting mental health by sharing experiences from the political to the clinical professional sphere, incorporating evidence-based best practices and adapting initiatives to achieve long- term sustainability of promoting mental health and well-being both at personal and population level. MENTOR works at addressing needs like equitable access to care for people with mental health conditions, reduction of stigma, recovery and inclusion by implementing shared guidelines for consideration of mental health in all policies, identifying evidence-based guidelines for promotion and prevention interventions targeted to young people and vulnerable groups in general population, supporting recovery-oriented and inclusive practice in the care of people with a mental health condition, and implementing personalized and comprehensive approaches to mental health. MENTOR will deliver specific activities focused on people in need (displaced citizens from Ukraine, PLE, youths with adverse living conditions), for instance developing the methodologic frame and standard for inclusive mental health policy and then creating best practise examples in different communities, the activities is planned to be wide spectrum from seminars and lectures which are taking place in real life setting in community to PLE training groups and digital solutions. In response to the urgent need to validate ethical, effective, safe, sustainable, trustworthy digital tools, MENTORS aims to endorse a set of standards for monitoring mental health and wellbeing and implement preventative and promotion actions by digital solutions. MENTOR is fully aligned with and complements public health strategies as well as other on-going investments and capacity building initiatives. Planned activities have potential to exert a substantial impact and results are efficiency oriented on several key mental health issues across member states and should attract interest from many countries as mental health is a priority in global action scope. LIST OF PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANTS Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info. Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC 1 COO RPNC VALSTS SIA RIGAS PSIHIATRIJAS UN LV 881163036 NARKOLOGIJAS CENTRS 2 BEN SHSO-MHS ORGANISMOS KRATIKON YPIRESION YGEIAS CY 891074787 3 BEN RSD REGION SYDDANMARK DK 999602073 4 BEN MOSA SOTSIAALMINISTEERIUM EE 998429731 5 BEN THL TERVEYDEN JA HYVINVOINNIN LAITOS FI 996697893 6 BEN FR-MOH MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA FR 998887377 PREVENTION 7 BEN BzGA BUNDESZENTRALE FUR GESUNDHEITLICHE DE 998190723 AUFKLARUNG 7.1 AE ULEI UNIVERSITAET LEIPZIG DE 999854564 3 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 PARTICIPANTS Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info. Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC 7.2 AE SB FREIE HANSESTADT BREMEN DE 998928796 8 BEN NNGYK NEMZETI NEPEGESZSEGUGYI ES HU 998706957 GYOGYSZERESZETI KOZPONT 8.1 AE OKFŐ ORSZAGOS KORHAZI FOIGAZGATOSAG HU 891516331 8.2 AE BCH MAGYARORSZAGI REFORMATUS EGYHAZ HU 918286488 BETHESDA GYERMEKKORHAZA 9 BEN DOHI LANDLAEKNIS EMBAETTID IS 955430213 9.1 AE PHCI HEILSUGAESLA HOFUDBORGARSVAEDISINS IS 917819724 9.2 AE NUHI LANDSPITALI UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL IS 999821390 10 BEN ISS ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITA IT 999978821 10.1 AE PROMIS AZIENDA ULSS 4 VENETO ORIENTALE IT 953342870 10.2 AE ASL TORINO AZIENDA SANITARIA LOCALE CITTA DI IT 899690036 TORINO 10.3 AE UniMiBI UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO- IT 999923531 BICOCCA 11 BEN SAM LT LIETUVOS RESPUBLIKOS SVEIKATOS LT 933839468 APSAUGOS MINISTERIJA 12 BEN RIVM RIJKSINSTITUUT VOOR VOLKSGEZONDHEID NL 999991431 EN MILIEU 12.1 AE TRIMBOS STICHTING TRIMBOS- INSTITUUT, NL 998923073 NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION 13 BEN NIPH FOLKEHELSEINSTITUTTET NO 999478883 13.1 AE SSB STATISTISK SENTRALBYRAA NO 999456379 14 BEN NHF NARODOWY FUNDUSZ ZDROWIA PL 998161332 15 BEN NCMHFAD CENTRUL NATIONAL DE SANATATE RO 933059685 MINTALA SI LUPTA ANTODROG 16 BEN NIJZ NACIONALNI INSTITUT ZA JAVNO ZDRAVJE SI 948891346 17 BEN BIOSISTEMAK ASOCIACIÓN INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACIÓN ES 955006420 EN SISTEMAS DE SALUD-BIOSISTEMAK 17.1 AE GENCAT DEPARTAMENT DE SALUT - GENERALITAT DE ES 999826919 CATALUNYA 17.2 AE FRCB-IDIBAPS FUNDACIO DE RECERCA CLINIC ES 999477525 BARCELONA-INSTITUT D INVESTIGACIONS BIOMEDIQUES AUGUST PI I SUNYER 17.3 AE ICO INSTITUT CATALA D'ONCOLOGIA ES 998420031 17.4 AE IDIVAL FUNDACION INSTITUTO DE INVESTIGACION ES 946556944 MARQUES DE VALDECILLA 17.5 AE FFIS FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E ES 962632463 4 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 PARTICIPANTS Grant Preparation (Beneficiaries screen) — Enter the info. Number Role Short name Legal name Country PIC INVESTIGACION SANITARIAS DE LA REGION DE MURCIA 17.6 AE SMS SERVICIO MURCIANO DE SALUD ES 934953804 17.7 AE SAS SERVICIO ANDALUZ DE SALUD ES 998853621 17.8 AE FUNDESALUD FUNDACION PARA LA FORMACION E ES 932288729 INVESTIGACION DE LOS PROFESIONALES DE LASALUD DE EXTREMADURA FUNDESALUD 18 BEN PHAS FOLKHALSOMYNDIGHETEN SE 949789954 19 BEN PHC STATE INSTITUTION PUBLIC HEALTH UA 906650465 CENTER OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE 20 AP DISA MINISTERE DE LA SANTE ET DE LA LU 998888153 SECURITE SOCIALE 21 AP MHB MEDIZINISCHE HOCHSCHULE DE 898913260 BRANDENBURG CAMPUS GMBH 22 AP LOMBARDIA REGIONE LOMBARDIA IT 999654065 23 AP HDIR HELSEDIREKTORATET NO 974772304 24 AP SES SERVICIO EXTREMENO DE SALUD ES 893253116 5 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 LIST OF WORK PACKAGES Work packages Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info. Work Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort Start End Deliverables Package No (Person- Month Month Months) WP1 Project management and coordination 1 - RPNC 165.22 1 36 D1.1 – Project handbook D1.2 – D1.5.1 Overview of foreseen activities to develop synergies with the JA D1.3 – D1.5.2 Report on first period of activities to build and strengthen synergies with the JA D1.4 – D1.5.3 Final report on synergies/ sustainability with the JA WP2 Dissemination 14 - NHF 70.16 1 36 D2.1 – D2.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis report D2.2 – D2.2.1 Dissemination and communication plan D2.3 – D2.3.1 Final report on Dissemination and communication activities in JA MENTOR WP3 Evaluation 17 - BIOSISTEMAK 57.55 1 36 D3.1 – D3.1.1 Evaluation framework and Impact assessment plan D3.2 – D3.2.1 Final evaluation report WP4 Sustainability 8.1 - OKFŐ 90.00 1 36 D4.1 – D4.1.1 Final Sustainability Report WP5 Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive 10 - ISS 424.82 1 36 D5.1 – D5.1.1 Report on state-of-the-art Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions knowledge on methodology, evaluation and implementation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) cycles in Europe, at national, regional and local level, including draft guidance/blueprint to support countries and regions/l D5.2 – D5.1.2 Piloting of MHIAP guidance 6 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Work packages Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info. Work Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort Start End Deliverables Package No (Person- Month Month Months) at local/regional and national level (policy action) D5.3 – D5.1.3 Report on shared learnings and identified synergies with and between MENTOR and other EU-supported initiatives, notably on how integrated policies may best support action as regards the promotion of equitable mental health/ well-being, also by inclu D5.4 – D5.2.1 Mapping of existing evidence-based guidelines personalized prevention/ promotion interventions targeted to young people D5.5 – D5.2.2 Community program inventory report D5.6 – D5.2.3 Developing advocacy communication materials and setting a digital advocacy strategy D5.7 – D5.2.4 Design of training and supervision initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings D5.8 – D5.3.1 Valorizing current good practices of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings D5.9 – D5.3.2 Development of models of training and peer support tools and development of evaluation tools D5.10 – D5.3.3 Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy at National level 7 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Work packages Grant Preparation (Work Packages screen) — Enter the info. Work Work Package name Lead Beneficiary Effort Start End Deliverables Package No (Person- Month Month Months) D5.11 – D5.4.1 Knowledge exchange report D5.12 – D5.4.2 Definition of an integrated care pathway shared among EU Members state D5.13 – D5.4.3 Assessment report on effectiveness and outcomes of implemented intervention D5.14 – D5.4.4 Advocacy Report on Community-Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization in EU Member States WP6 Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental 13 - NIPH 332.80 1 36 D6.1 – D6.1.1 Web resource for best Health across Europe practice methods D6.2 – D6.1.2 Recommendations for action on early problematic digital technology use (PDTU) prevention D6.3 – D6.2.1 Guidelines/checklists for an online platfom for mental health promotion in the community: schools, workplaces and municipalities D6.4 – D6.2.2 Evaluation of the pilot of Happ app D6.5 – D6.3.1 Validated version of the CIDI D6.6 – D6.3.2 Online solution for self- report of mental health in adolescence D6.7 – D6.3.3 Scalable digital self- administered clinical assessment tools of well-being and threats to mental health 8 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Work package WP1 – Project management and coordination Work Package Number WP1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - RPNC Work Package Name Project management and coordination Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives To create and coordinate a structure that would ensure project’s smooth and goal-oriented implementation. To develop consortium agreement, coordinate administrative and financial issues, communicate and report to HaDEA and DG Sante. Support WP collaboration and interactions. Ensure stakeholder involvement and maintain contacts. Description To ensure the project implementation of high quality and completed in time, JA Coordinator will provide project management plans and tools, planning, organizing and controlling the implementation process at regular intervals, both to ensure task execution according to expected results and within budget in order to achieve JA MENTOR goals and improve the population mental health. Work package WP2 – Dissemination Work Package Number WP2 Lead Beneficiary 14 - NHF Work Package Name Dissemination Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives Developing and implementing a comprehensive communication and dissemination plan to raise awareness about the project, its activities and its achievements based on clearly identified and segmented target audiences. Providing an internal/external web-based platform which will allow the MENTOR participants to access, upload/ download key documents, keeping them up to date about the different activities of each WP and encouraging cooperation on common activities. Setting-up and manage the appropriate communication tools (e.g., MENTOR website, social media accounts, flyers, posters, videos, etc.) in order to keep the project’s partners and stakeholders informed about the goals, activities and major achievements of the MENTOR. Maintaining and enforcing a dialogue between the members of the JA and stakeholders – e.g.; other JAs funded by EU4Health, TEI representatives, other DGs of the EC, national ministries, international organisations, the general public, etc. Disseminating project results to the key audiences in specific events and forums. Description The purpose of WP2 in MENTOR is to facilitate and improve effective, and sustainable external and internal communication and to ensure that its objectives, activities, results and deliverables are known to the project partners and all other stakeholders and can be transferred and/or scaled-up. The strategy is implying an equal contribution of all involved partners, under the coordination of the WP2 leader. The objective is to set up, deploy and manage all available communication channels and tools (website, social media, videos, flyers, posters and publications, etc.) to increase the visibility of the MENTOR among key stakeholders depending on clearly identified targets (e. g. ministries, the EC 9 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 services and agencies, international organisations, vulnerable groups, general public). The above-mentioned channels and tools will be used also to optimize the use of resources for supporting its establishment and sustainability Work package WP3 – Evaluation Work Package Number WP3 Lead Beneficiary 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Work Package Name Evaluation Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives The specific objectives of WP3 are: Design the Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) to guide the Joint Action progress study by defining the scope, methodology framework, and data collection and monitoring methods. Analyse the project activities and report the results in a timely manner during the whole project. Develop the assessment approach, including research methodology, indicators, measurement tools, and time-points, to facilitate the study of the MENTOR impact. Description The main objectives of the WP3 are: Monitor the quality and compliance of the MENTOR process and stakeholders´ views inclusion and satisfaction, ensuring the project progresses adequately according to the work plan. Assess the relevance and pertinence of the outcomes according to the needs and expectations of the target groups identified. Perform a structured and systematic appraisal of the impact of the JA in Europe regarding dimensions related to Sustainability, Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions (Advancing mental health in all policies, Supporting prevention / promotion actions targeted to young people, Involvement of people with lived experience (PLE) in mental health policies and Integrating care pathway for promoting social inclusion and quality of life) and Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe (Overview of effective and efficient strategies for Mental health promotion and PDTU; Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental health and Innovative, best practice solutions to assessing and monitoring the mental health status across Europe ). Work package WP4 – Sustainability Work Package Number WP4 Lead Beneficiary 8.1 - OKFŐ Work Package Name Sustainability Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives The main objective of the WP4 is to enable and support the uptake, uphold, reinforcement and scale-up of pilot implementations, outputs and results of the project in addressing mental health challenges in participating countries and beyond. MENTOR standardized methodological framework for sustainability activities consists of 4 tasks that cover all phases of situation analysis, the sustainability of pilot implementations, and the development of final sustainability plan with planned activities for the time after MENTOR. The application of the standardized methodological framework, adjusted to the needs of the technical work packages (WP5, WP6), will be supported by a systematic stepwise capacity building approach. 10 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Description Two overarching principles are applied in MENTOR pilot implementation: (1) Equity and diversity perspective, with and aim to design and implement targeted interventions specifically tailored to address the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable population groups. This includes initiatives focusing on migrants, refugees, Roma people, people displaced from Ukraine, children, adolescents, and youth within these communities. These interventions will aim to reduce disparities in mental health outcomes and ensure equitable access to support services and resources. (2) Sustainability principle, that in all steps of design, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and reporting include essential elements, that will increase the ability of MENTOR pilots to have sustainable impact after MENTOR ends in the sense of further exploitation of the results. Elements of sustainability are policy environment, ownership of sustainability and culture of communication and consensus seeking. Work package WP5 – Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions Work Package Number WP5 Lead Beneficiary 10 - ISS Work Package Name Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives The specific outcomes of the WP5 are: Developed/encouraged collaboration among different policies in mental health issues. Supported national and regional policy-makers in the design, implementation and innovation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) approaches by developing and piloting a flexible methodology to support implementation of MHIAP; Identified evidence-based and innovative best practices for the promotion and prevention interventions targeted to vulnerable groups and tackling stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems and addiction by sharing good practices, methods Empowered people with lived experience (PLE) and their inclusion in mental health policy and services. Provided care pathways to promote proactive and person-centered care for people with mental health disorders through the Personal Budget methodology. Description WP5 aims at contributing to furthering actions to address mental health in a more comprehensive way that spans across different policy domains. The building of a new comprehensive, prevention and promotion-oriented multilateral approach to mental health. WP5 activities are designed to meet the overall MENTOR goal of promoting mental health by sharing experiences from policy to clinical and from individual to population levels. WP5 addresses the needs of people with defined mental disorders but also intends to promote the mental health of European region population, recognizing the intrinsic value of positive mental health. In this framework, Project Partners will work on new approaches and actions throughout the EU, in line with the Healthier Together EU NCD initiative, which aims to promote mental health and prevent and address at the population-level mental health problems and mental disorders, and to set up ways to support people living with mental disorders. Work package WP6 – Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe Work Package Number WP6 Lead Beneficiary 13 - NIPH 11 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Work Package Name Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe Start Month 1 End Month 36 Objectives In sum WP 6 will create a digital repository for mental health promotion and assessment and support the dissemination of tested tools into member states. By achieving these goals, WP 6 will: Support mental health especially also in vulnerable groups, including migrants, refugees, young people and people with less education and less socio-economic resources. Contribute to better and earlier detection of individuals at risk of developing mental health problems. Improve access to evidence based and best practice innovative approaches and methods to promoting wellbeing and managing mental health conditions in different settings. throughout the life course, targeting diverse population groups across Europe, including vulnerable groups. Improve access and help to up-scale public health interventions in Member States. Identify, pilot, and evaluate innovative approaches to monitoring, preventing, and managing mental health problems. Description A multi-level approach is pivotal for promoting mental health within the framework of the MHIAP. This encompasses interventions on the international, national, regional, local, and individual levels. WP 5 adopts a comprehensive strategy aiming at developing and sharing plans, guidelines, and policy documents for health authorities at local, regional, and national levels rooted in evidence-based and best practice solutions. The individual level is crucial in mental health promotion due to the direct impact of mental health issues and resilience at the individual level, as well as the need for comprehensive monitoring of mental health within populations. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate individual- level interventions and assessments in mental health promotion initiatives. WP6 complements WP5 by promoting and delivering evidence based, effective and adaptable tools for promoting good mental health, assessing mental health in European Societies and thus also creating awareness for mental health problems. WP 6 will coordinate especially with task 5.2 to ensure consistent criteria for digital and non/digital instruments for early detection, prevention and treatment of mental health problems and to insure effective communication of the generated results. Interventions and assessments at the individual level can be cost-prohibitive and inaccessible for marginalized groups, especially if they rely on one-on-one interactions. Furthermore, language barriers often hinder access to these services for vulnerable groups such as migrants and refugees. Hence WP6 is dedicated to leveraging modern technology to facilitate the efficient development and deployment of innovative web-based tools for mental health promotion and assessment. These tools can be used by authorities on all levels helping the effectuation of plans and policies, essential for addressing the needs of vulnerable populations. WP6 identifies, pilots and evaluates innovative approaches to preventing and managing mental health problems. Through the development and promotion of these tools, WP6 aims to improve the ability to identify individuals at risk, enhance access to evidence-based innovative approaches and scale up affordable interventions. Ultimately, these efforts are directed towards improving the quality of life for patients and their families. The first task in WP 6 is to identify, collect, and share best and promising practices for web-based mental health interventions. All project participants will be invited to supply their best examples of effective preventive or promoting methods, in order to build a pool of methods and tools, which can be shared with other MS. The potential for upscaling and sharing to other Member States (MS) will be facilitated. The second task will be devoted to adapting and implementing promising digital tools for diverse target groups. We will focus on implementing 3 solutions: A platform to manage mental health at community level, a wellbeing app aimed at individuals focusing on young people and vulnerable groups and an online platform to facilitate physical exercise for people with mental health difficulties. The third group of tasks in WP 6 involves developing evidence based digital tools to assess mental health problems and related risk and protective factors through self-reports. After adapting the instrument for use in different MS and in particular also for use by marginalized and vulnerable communities, WP 6 will conduct a pilot study to map mental health, especially also persons displaced from Ukraine, in different MS. WP 6 will also prepare a digital self-administered version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). CIDI is developed and maintained by WHO, and it is a tool to assess the prevalence of mental disorders and the need for mental health care services in adults. The digital 12 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 self-administered version of CIDI will be validated against the interviewer administered version of CIDI in Norway. The digital, self-administered version of CIDI will be made available to MS in cooperation with the WHO. Finally, WP 6 will also adjust, translate and pilot a web-based screening tool designed for the assessment of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) and additional determinants that affect mental health in children and youth. 13 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 STAFF EFFORT Staff effort per participant Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info. Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total Person-Months 1 - RPNC 113.40 1.00 5.40 2.00 13.68 11.50 146.98 2 - SHSO-MHS 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.50 17.28 16.18 36.36 3 - RSD 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 10.00 4 - MOSA 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.50 21.67 24.77 5 - THL 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.50 20.52 23.42 6 - FR-MOH 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.50 13.46 16.36 7 - BzGA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.50 9.72 18.27 32.49 7.1 - ULEI 11.99 11.99 7.2 - SB 1.00 19.40 20.40 8 - NNGYK 1.00 0.60 1.00 1.00 16.00 13.00 32.60 8.1 - OKFŐ 4.00 1.00 7.15 48.00 27.44 21.37 108.96 8.2 - BCH 0.50 13.80 7.48 21.78 9 - DOHI 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 14.20 27.00 47.20 9.1 - PHCI 4.75 3.00 7.75 9.2 - NUHI 3.42 3.42 10 - ISS 9.00 3.00 6.00 6.00 60.00 10.00 94.00 10.1 - PROMIS 16.82 0.36 1.72 18.90 10.2 - ASL TORINO 1.00 0.68 1.68 10.3 - UniMiBI 7.50 7.50 14 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Staff effort per participant Grant Preparation (Work packages - Effort screen) — Enter the info. Participant WP1 WP2 WP3 WP4 WP5 WP6 Total Person-Months 11 - SAM LT 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.50 9.31 12.41 12 - RIVM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12.66 2.50 19.16 12.1 - TRIMBOS 8.42 4.00 12.42 13 - NIPH 1.00 1.00 2.30 2.00 59.03 65.33 13.1 - SSB 14.20 14.20 14 - NHF 3.00 52.56 5.40 1.00 2.00 3.87 67.83 15 - NCMHFAD 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.50 29.75 32.85 16 - NIJZ 1.00 1.00 1.30 18.00 31.32 32.16 84.78 17 - BIOSISTEMAK 3.00 1.00 14.00 2.00 5.26 3.00 28.26 17.1 - GENCAT 4.75 1.44 6.19 17.2 - FRCB-IDIBAPS 2.95 4.59 7.54 17.3 - ICO 3.96 3.96 17.4 - IDIVAL 4.57 5.48 10.05 17.5 - FFIS 7.50 7.50 17.6 - SMS 6.50 6.50 17.7 - SAS 7.70 5.37 13.07 17.8 - FUNDESALUD 4.57 1.52 6.09 18 - PHAS 1.00 0.40 1.00 0.50 13.68 16.58 19 - PHC 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.50 22.80 33.37 59.27 Total Person-Months 165.22 70.16 57.55 90.00 424.82 332.80 1140.55 15 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 LIST OF DELIVERABLES Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No D1.1 Project handbook WP1 1 - RPNC R — Document, report PU - Public 3 D1.2 D1.5.1 Overview of foreseen activities to WP1 1 - RPNC R — Document, report PU - Public 5 develop synergies with the JA D1.3 D1.5.2 Report on first period of activities to WP1 1 - RPNC R — Document, report PU - Public 15 build and strengthen synergies with the JA D1.4 D1.5.3 Final report on synergies/ WP1 1 - RPNC R — Document, report PU - Public 30 sustainability with the JA D2.1 D2.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis report WP2 14 - NHF R — Document, report PU - Public 7 D2.2 D2.2.1 Dissemination and communication WP2 14 - NHF R — Document, report PU - Public 7 plan D2.3 D2.3.1 Final report on Dissemination and WP2 14 - NHF R — Document, report PU - Public 36 communication activities in JA MENTOR D3.1 D3.1.1 Evaluation framework and Impact WP3 17 - BIOSISTEMAK R — Document, report PU - Public 12 assessment plan D3.2 D3.2.1 Final evaluation report WP3 17 - BIOSISTEMAK R — Document, report PU - Public 36 D4.1 D4.1.1 Final Sustainability Report WP4 8.1 - OKFŐ R — Document, report PU - Public 34 D5.1 D5.1.1 Report on state-of-the-art WP5 12 - RIVM R — Document, report PU - Public 10 16 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No knowledge on methodology, evaluation and implementation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) cycles in Europe, at national, regional and local level, including draft guidance/blueprint to support countries and regions/l D5.2 D5.1.2 Piloting of MHIAP guidance at local/ WP5 18 - PHAS R — Document, report PU - Public 30 regional and national level (policy action) D5.3 D5.1.3 Report on shared learnings WP5 12 - RIVM R — Document, report PU - Public 34 and identified synergies with and between MENTOR and other EU-supported initiatives, notably on how integrated policies may best support action as regards the promotion of equitable mental health/ well-being, also by inclu D5.4 D5.2.1 Mapping of existing evidence- WP5 8.1 - OKFŐ R — Document, report PU - Public 36 based guidelines personalized prevention/ promotion interventions targeted to young people D5.5 D5.2.2 Community program inventory WP5 8.1 - OKFŐ R — Document, report PU - Public 36 report D5.6 D5.2.3 Developing advocacy WP5 7.1 - ULEI R — Document, report PU - Public 24 17 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No communication materials and setting a digital advocacy strategy D5.7 D5.2.4 Design of training and supervision WP5 17.5 - FFIS R — Document, report PU - Public 33 initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings D5.8 D5.3.1 Valorizing current good practices WP5 7.2 - SB R — Document, report PU - Public 12 of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings D5.9 D5.3.2 Development of models of training WP5 10.2 - ASL TORINO R — Document, report PU - Public 24 and peer support tools and development of evaluation tools D5.10 D5.3.3 Guidelines and recommendations for WP5 7.2 - SB R — Document, report PU - Public 36 a destigmatization strategy at National level D5.11 D5.4.1 Knowledge exchange report WP5 10 - ISS R — Document, report PU - Public 12 D5.12 D5.4.2 Definition of an integrated care WP5 10 - ISS R — Document, report PU - Public 21 pathway shared among EU Members state D5.13 D5.4.3 Assessment report on effectiveness WP5 10 - ISS R — Document, report PU - Public 33 and outcomes of implemented intervention D5.14 D5.4.4 Advocacy Report on Community- WP5 10 - ISS R — Document, report PU - Public 36 18 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverables Grant Preparation (Deliverables screen) — Enter the info. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified —RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision 2015/444 Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Level Due Date No Package (month) No Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization in EU Member States D6.1 D6.1.1 Web resource for best practice WP6 9 - DOHI DEC —Websites, patent PU - Public 24 methods filings, videos, etc D6.2 D6.1.2 Recommendations for action on early WP6 16 - NIJZ R — Document, report PU - Public 32 problematic digital technology use (PDTU) prevention D6.3 D6.2.1 Guidelines/checklists for an online WP6 9 - DOHI R — Document, report PU - Public 30 platfom for mental health promotion in the community: schools, workplaces and municipalities D6.4 D6.2.2 Evaluation of the pilot of Happ app WP6 9 - DOHI R — Document, report PU - Public 32 D6.5 D6.3.1 Validated version of the CIDI WP6 13 - NIPH DEC —Websites, patent PU - Public 33 filings, videos, etc D6.6 D6.3.2 Online solution for self-report of WP6 13 - NIPH DEC —Websites, patent PU - Public 33 mental health in adolescence filings, videos, etc D6.7 D6.3.3 Scalable digital self-administered WP6 8.1 - OKFŐ DEC —Websites, patent PU - Public 27 clinical assessment tools of well-being and filings, videos, etc threats to mental health 19 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverable D1.1 – Project handbook Deliverable Number D1.1 Lead Beneficiary 1 - RPNC Deliverable Name Project handbook Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 3 Work Package No WP1 Description The Project Handbook is the basis for managing the project throughout its life cycle and is an important reference for all project members - it summarizes the project objectives and documents the selected approach for achieving the project goals. The Project Handbook documents the project’s roles and responsibilities, provides several project management plans for achieving the project goals and establishes the implementation strategy, as well as the management and monitoring framework. Project Handbook will be updated when necessary. Document, PDF, English. Deliverable D1.2 – D1.5.1 Overview of foreseen activities to develop synergies with the JA Deliverable Number D1.2 Lead Beneficiary 1 - RPNC Deliverable Name D1.5.1 Overview of foreseen activities to develop synergies with the JA Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 5 Work Package No WP1 Description Overview of foreseen activities to develop synergies with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. English PDF. Deliverable D1.3 – D1.5.2 Report on first period of activities to build and strengthen synergies with the JA Deliverable Number D1.3 Lead Beneficiary 1 - RPNC Deliverable Name D1.5.2 Report on first period of activities to build and strengthen synergies with the JA Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 15 Work Package No WP1 Description Report on first period of activities to build and strengthen synergies with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. English PDF. Deliverable D1.4 – D1.5.3 Final report on synergies/sustainability with the JA Deliverable Number D1.4 Lead Beneficiary 1 - RPNC Deliverable Name D1.5.3 Final report on synergies/sustainability with the JA Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP1 20 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Description Final report on activities and synergies with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. English PDF. Deliverable D2.1 – D2.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis report Deliverable Number D2.1 Lead Beneficiary 14 - NHF Deliverable Name D2.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 7 Work Package No WP2 Description Stakeholder analysis report – English, PDF Deliverable D2.2 – D2.2.1 Dissemination and communication plan Deliverable Number D2.2 Lead Beneficiary 14 - NHF Deliverable Name D2.2.1 Dissemination and communication plan Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 7 Work Package No WP2 Description Plan with the brand identity, target definition, website and social media and the way to disseminate all activities for partners which ensure that JA will be visible on all levels – English, PDF. Deliverable D2.3 – D2.3.1 Final report on Dissemination and communication activities in JA MENTOR Deliverable Number D2.3 Lead Beneficiary 14 - NHF Deliverable Name D2.3.1 Final report on Dissemination and communication activities in JA MENTOR Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP2 Description The report of all JA actions connected to communication and dissemination – English, PDF. Deliverable D3.1 – D3.1.1 Evaluation framework and Impact assessment plan Deliverable Number D3.1 Lead Beneficiary 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Deliverable Name D3.1.1 Evaluation framework and Impact assessment plan Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP3 21 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Description Document, planning the evaluation framework and the impact assessment measures - English PDF Deliverable D3.2 – D3.2.1 Final evaluation report Deliverable Number D3.2 Lead Beneficiary 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Deliverable Name D3.2.1 Final evaluation report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP3 Description The report summarizes all the evaluation activities implemented – English, PDF. Deliverable D4.1 – D4.1.1 Final Sustainability Report Deliverable Number D4.1 Lead Beneficiary 8.1 - OKFŐ Deliverable Name D4.1.1 Final Sustainability Report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 34 Work Package No WP4 Description Building upon the results gained from the evaluation of pilots towards sustainability, tailored sustainability action plans for each pilot site, a comprehensive sustainability report will be delivered, ensuring alignment and strategy integration for continued project impact. English, PDF. Deliverable D5.1 – D5.1.1 Report on state-of-the-art knowledge on methodology, evaluation and implementation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) cycles in Europe, at national, regional and local level, including draft guidance/blueprint to support countries and regions/l Deliverable Number D5.1 Lead Beneficiary 12 - RIVM Deliverable Name D5.1.1 Report on state-of-the-art knowledge on methodology, evaluation and implementation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) cycles in Europe, at national, regional and local level, including draft guidance/blueprint to support countries and regions/l Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 10 Work Package No WP5 Description Mapping review of: (a) existing knowledge of and experience with MHIAP methodology, also in combination with health equity (impact) assessments and (b) how countries and regions participating in this task have developed their MHIA policy cycle (development – implementation – evaluation – adaptation) and what lessons can be learned from this. Where possible, the equity lens applied in this work will zoom in on what specific MHIAP approaches may be of particular relevance 22 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 to specific vulnerable groups. It will also aspire to gather information on possible involvement of PLE in MHIA policy cycles. This mapping review will leverage existing reviews and position papers on MHIA, as well as additional analysis of academic and grey literature, policy documents, reports, and case studies from various countries and organizations that have implemented MHIAP approaches. The review will culminate with a translation of the lessons learned from countries and literature into a set of recommendations and guidance to support countries and/or regions in the use of MHIAP methodologies (also to the benefit of vulnerable groups), their potential impact, and their evaluation. Report in English. Deliverable D5.2 – D5.1.2 Piloting of MHIAP guidance at local/regional and national level (policy action) Deliverable Number D5.2 Lead Beneficiary 18 - PHAS Deliverable Name D5.1.2 Piloting of MHIAP guidance at local/regional and national level (policy action) Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP5 Description Four Member States (Estonia, Lithuania, Iceland and Slovenia) have already indicated they would like to pilot the MHIAP guidance. These four countries have the choice to pilot the guidance at a national policy level or a local/regional policy level. As such, these country pilots will operate as separate case studies, trying out the MHIAP guidance within the scope of their specific national/regional context. This will generate helpful feedback on barriers and enables as regards the applicability of the methodology in different real-life settings. (Task) partner countries that do not pilot the guidance themselves will be able to take on an observer role. To facilitate this, a learning lab will be established to enable cross- country learning as well as maximise efficient use of resources. This learning network lab will facilitate exchange of information and (initial) experience of how countries have implemented dapted the draft guidance (deliverable 5.1.1) for their local contexts, what tailoring was needed to make the approach work usable in the local context, discuss implementation experiences, and discuss next steps. It is envisaged that the countries participating in this learning network will have varying experience levels in using MHIAP methodologies (e.g., some more familiar with HIAP as a policy framing, use of health equity impact assessments, perhaps local examples of this). This learning lab will consist therefore of 4 pilot countries and 10 observer countries, who will come together online and in person (where budget and resources permit) to exchange experiences in implementing/adapting the guidance. This will enable 4 different case studies reflecting different contexts to be prepared for inclusion in the final methodology/guidance, which will help give the guidance a more practical focus. Deliverable D5.3 – D5.1.3 Report on shared learnings and identified synergies with and between MENTOR and other EU-supported initiatives, notably on how integrated policies may best support action as regards the promotion of equitable mental health/well-being, also by inclu Deliverable Number D5.3 Lead Beneficiary 12 - RIVM Deliverable Name D5.1.3 Report on shared learnings and identified synergies with and between MENTOR and other EU-supported initiatives, notably on how integrated policies may best support action as regards the promotion of equitable mental health/well-being, also by inclu Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 34 Work Package No WP5 Description 23 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Learnings that could be included here (depending on the time they become available) include JA PREVENT (task 9.2) outcomes, and insights and experiences gathered via the capacity-building work under Flagship 1 of the EU Communication on a Comprehensive Approach to Mental Health, implemented by WHO Europe. This will be channeled via a 'practice and policy dialogue’ event. Deliverable D5.4 – D5.2.1 Mapping of existing evidence-based guidelines personalized prevention/ promotion interventions targeted to young people Deliverable Number D5.4 Lead Beneficiary 8.1 - OKFŐ Deliverable Name D5.2.1 Mapping of existing evidence-based guidelines personalized prevention/ promotion interventions targeted to young people Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP5 Description This report will map good/best practices (hence already implemented, as well as present in the EC Best Practices Portal),, measures, and strategies with focus on Mental Health promotion and prevention at both national and local level focused on young people. The report will emphasize a strong focus on vulnerable populations, providing insights into effective strategies for addressing mental health challenges among this demographic. English, PDF Deliverable D5.5 – D5.2.2 Community program inventory report Deliverable Number D5.5 Lead Beneficiary 8.1 - OKFŐ Deliverable Name D5.2.2 Community program inventory report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP5 Description Based on a set of criteria developed by the partners, this report identifies best practices in community mental health promotion and prevention programs in various settings (municipalities, schools, kindergartens, social services, workplaces, local communities, etc.) for different target groups (e.g., teachers, social worker, childcare workers, health visitors, parents, carers). The inventory report will contain a set of programs (already implemented by some MS) that could be used by each Country to set community programs for young people addressing the mental health burden. In particular, we will identify and evaluate innovative approaches to preventing and managing mental health problems in various community settings e.g., use of social prescribing (arts, sports etc.) and use of a community-based social franchising approach. This report will include targeted measures and community programs focusing on equity, including specific actions to support vulnerable groups such as migrants, refugees, Roma, and displaced persons from Ukraine. It will also cover actions aimed at reducing health inequalities, particularly among socio-economically disadvantaged populations. Additionally, the report will highlight targeted actions addressing mental health challenges exacerbated by the pandemic.. English, PDF Deliverable D5.6 – D5.2.3 Developing advocacy communication materials and setting a digital advocacy strategy Deliverable Number D5.6 Lead Beneficiary 7.1 - ULEI Deliverable Name D5.2.3 Developing advocacy communication materials and setting a digital advocacy strategy 24 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP5 Description In this Report the results of a digital advocacy strategy will be described. This activity foresees a first co-design phase (including adaptation of the media guideline and developing a digital advocacy strategy), that includes PLE and the destigmatization of young people with problematic substance use. In synergy with D5.2.2 and D5.3.3, we will use the potential power of media as an instrument for preventing and combating all forms of stigmatization and for gaining support for public and societal policies to promote healthier environments, also adapting good practices such as FairMediaSUCHT. English, PDF Deliverable D5.7 – D5.2.4 Design of training and supervision initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings Deliverable Number D5.7 Lead Beneficiary 17.5 - FFIS Deliverable Name D5.2.4 Design of training and supervision initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 33 Work Package No WP5 Description In parallel, Partners will work on the design of a training path targeted to professionals/educators of different settings. In particular, in this subtask, partners will design a tailored initiative to train the trainers (professionals and educators) on how to manage vulnerable mental health of the young people, also using the communication tools previously developed. A focus will be done to foster the mental resilience of young populations in times of crisis, in order to prevent their negative impact on mental health, to improve populations’ ability to cope with (or the overcoming of) stress and anxiety: lessons learned from the Covid pandemic and other crisis, exploring how to prevent and mitigate their impact on the general population and on vulnerable groups, develop guidelines to disseminate in members states. English, PDF Deliverable D5.8 – D5.3.1 Valorizing current good practices of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings Deliverable Number D5.8 Lead Beneficiary 7.2 - SB Deliverable Name D5.3.1 Valorizing current good practices of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP5 Description Partners will implement the following steps: Collection of good practices / experiences in different countries Development of strategies for PLE involvement in mental health including prevention and health promotion Dissemination of current best practices on social inclusion for individuals with mental health conditions by leveraging studies conducted in this field as well as the experience gained from previous successful European projects. 25 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 A document of strategies for PLE involvement for countries on different levels of participation will be produced as expected outcome. English, PDF. Deliverable D5.9 – D5.3.2 Development of models of training and peer support tools and development of evaluation tools Deliverable Number D5.9 Lead Beneficiary 10.2 - ASL TORINO Deliverable Name D5.3.2 Development of models of training and peer support tools and development of evaluation tools Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP5 Description Country needs, capacity and starting conditions will inform the development of this deliverable which will be organised in the following steps: design of tailored trainings and support exchange tools, targeted to peer supporters (i.e., peer networks) Online „Train the Trainer“workshops, to build on country capacity to train PLE Delivery of trainings in countries who decided to actively implementing actions Evaluation of test phase outcomes by research activities Development of recommendations for improving MH services/strategies from lessons learned The meaningful involvement of PLE in the co-production, i.e., working together at any level of action, will be ensured during the entire project. English, PDF. Deliverable D5.10 – D5.3.3 Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy at National level Deliverable Number D5.10 Lead Beneficiary 7.2 - SB Deliverable Name D5.3.3 Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy at National level Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP5 Description Document to define a destigmatization strategy of MH issues to be implemented at National level. This guidelines will promote the exchange of experiences among MH professionals and PLEs regarding successful implementation processes and defining collaboration protocols and procedures. In synergy with the approach of the MHIAP , Partners will define recommendations for a strategy on: promotion and prevention of good MH and wellbeing, such as prevention of suicide and depression Reduction of stigma and promotion of social inclusion, especially supporting the transition from youth to adult care Improvement of mental health systems, supporting recovery-oriented services and to reduce stigma, through the inclusion of PLE voice, knowledge and practice 26 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverable D5.11 – D5.4.1 Knowledge exchange report Deliverable Number D5.11 Lead Beneficiary 10 - ISS Deliverable Name D5.4.1 Knowledge exchange report Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 12 Work Package No WP5 Description Assessment of local population’ needs, services and policies by a Panel of representatives from ministries, public agencies, mental health and social work professionals, municipalities and people with lived experiences. -Establishment of the panel with public and private organizations - Preparation and dissemination of a survey to collect: 1. needs, suggestions and critical issues observed by the population in each country; 2. information about Social and health services devoted to care of people with mental health disorders (MHDs); 3. country policies on integrated social-health pathway for people with MHDs. - Analysis of data collected by the survey and preparation of the Knowledge exchange report with information collected by the countries involved in the task. Deliverable D5.12 – D5.4.2 Definition of an integrated care pathway shared among EU Members state Deliverable Number D5.12 Lead Beneficiary 10 - ISS Deliverable Name D5.4.2 Definition of an integrated care pathway shared among EU Members state Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 21 Work Package No WP5 Description Definition and description of the key components of the integrated care pathway in MH through: 1. Identification of the key components of the integrated care pathway among countries (based on the information collected by D.5.4.1) for promoting social inclusion and quality of life of people with MHDs 2. Publication of the document through the JA website for the collection of comments and suggestions by the stakeholders (i.e., MH clinical centers, PLE, NGOs, Municipalities, etc.). All comments and notes will be shared within the Panel to make adjustments and the final document will be defined. 3.Translation of the final document in all the different European languages. Deliverable D5.13 – D5.4.3 Assessment report on effectiveness and outcomes of implemented intervention Deliverable Number D5.13 Lead Beneficiary 10 - ISS Deliverable Name D5.4.3 Assessment report on effectiveness and outcomes of implemented intervention Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 33 Work Package No WP5 Description 27 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway among EU Member States: Impact evaluations will be conducted to assess the effectiveness and outcomes of implemented interventions. - Development of guidelines for implementing the integrated care pathway among EU Member States (in the Social and health services). - Training of professionals - Implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway among a sample of people with MHDs. The care pathway will be assessed using the online tool for self-assessment of integrated care and standardized outcome measures and quality of life assessments to objectively track improvements in mental health and overall well-being. - Analyze data, gather feedback, and make improvements as needed to enhance the quality of care provided Deliverable D5.14 – D5.4.4 Advocacy Report on Community-Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization in EU Member States Deliverable Number D5.14 Lead Beneficiary 10 - ISS Deliverable Name D5.4.4 Advocacy Report on Community-Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization in EU Member States Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 36 Work Package No WP5 Description Partners will identify, collect and share best and promising practices on a comprehensive community-based approach to MH. They will advocate for policies that prioritize community-based MH care within EU Member States. The Panel will formulate distinct sets of tailor-made recommendations and their rollout for implementation for three distinct target audiences: 1.Social and Health Ministers: The Panel will provide specific policy guidance to Ministers responsible for healthcare and related sectors. These recommendations will be informed by evidence-based practices and aimed at promoting systemic improvements in mental health care delivery. 2.Professionals 3.General public Deliverable D6.1 – D6.1.1 Web resource for best practice methods Deliverable Number D6.1 Lead Beneficiary 9 - DOHI Deliverable Name D6.1.1 Web resource for best practice methods Type DEC —Websites, patent Dissemination Level PU - Public filings, videos, etc Due Date (month) 24 Work Package No WP6 Description The descriptions and links to the tools will be published online in English. The web resource will be available for all, building on experiences from Member States on how they gather information on digital solutions at present. E.g., in Norway, information on evaluated interventions and methods for young people, operational ratings, and data on evaluation and implementation are gathered on a site called Ungsinn.no. Deliverable D6.2 – D6.1.2 Recommendations for action on early problematic digital technology use (PDTU) prevention Deliverable Number D6.2 Lead Beneficiary 16 - NIJZ 28 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Deliverable Name D6.1.2 Recommendations for action on early problematic digital technology use (PDTU) prevention Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 32 Work Package No WP6 Description A set of recommendations for action, based on report on PDTU related policies, regulations and strategic documents, Stakeholder analysis report, report on workshops’ results and SWOT analysis report on early PDTU prevention. E-leaflet or infographics on recommendations for action, (optionally) translated in to participating MS languages. Deliverable D6.3 – D6.2.1 Guidelines/checklists for an online platfom for mental health promotion in the community: schools, workplaces and municipalities Deliverable Number D6.3 Lead Beneficiary 9 - DOHI Deliverable Name D6.2.1 Guidelines/checklists for an online platfom for mental health promotion in the community: schools, workplaces and municipalities Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 30 Work Package No WP6 Description The guidelines/checklists will be translated by each country, making sure that they are easily adaptable across the EU. The final product and all translations/adaptations will be available to all MS at no cost. Deliverable D6.4 – D6.2.2 Evaluation of the pilot of Happ app Deliverable Number D6.4 Lead Beneficiary 9 - DOHI Deliverable Name D6.2.2 Evaluation of the pilot of Happ app Type R — Document, report Dissemination Level PU - Public Due Date (month) 32 Work Package No WP6 Description This digital mental health tool will be adapted to meet the needs of young people and vulnerable groups and will be piloted in Iceland and participating countries. The pilot test will be evaluated for suitability and effectiveness based on previously determined objectives and criteria. Feedback and suggestions will be reviewed, and strengths as well as shortcomings and limitations identified. An online report on this will be published and shared with all participating countries. Deliverable D6.5 – D6.3.1 Validated version of the CIDI Deliverable Number D6.5 Lead Beneficiary 13 - NIPH Deliverable Name D6.3.1 Validated version of the CIDI Type DEC —Websites, patent Dissemination Level PU - Public filings, videos, etc Due Date (month) 33 Work Package No WP6 29 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Description A validated digital version of CIDI adapted for smartphones will be made available in several languages for MS in collaboration with WHO. Deliverable D6.6 – D6.3.2 Online solution for self-report of mental health in adolescence Deliverable Number D6.6 Lead Beneficiary 13 - NIPH Deliverable Name D6.3.2 Online solution for self-report of mental health in adolescence Type DEC —Websites, patent Dissemination Level PU - Public filings, videos, etc Due Date (month) 33 Work Package No WP6 Description An online assessment tool for mental health problems in adolescents available in multiple languages. The tool will have versions that facilitate participation of marginalized groups with low low-literacy. And support scaling up into MS by being hosted compliant with data protection laws in MS. Deliverable D6.7 – D6.3.3 Scalable digital self-administered clinical assessment tools of well- being and threats to mental health Deliverable Number D6.7 Lead Beneficiary 8.1 - OKFŐ Deliverable Name D6.3.3 Scalable digital self-administered clinical assessment tools of well-being and threats to mental health Type DEC —Websites, patent Dissemination Level PU - Public filings, videos, etc Due Date (month) 27 Work Package No WP6 Description digital screening instrument including items from the ACE-IQ (Adverse Childhood Experiences – International Questionnaire), with additional questions concerning wellbeing will be piloted in anonymous groups of youth recruited from high school. 30 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 LIST OF MILESTONES Milestones Grant Preparation (Milestones screen) — Enter the info. Milestone Milestone Name Work Package No Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Due Date No (month) 1 Project Management platform established WP1 1 - RPNC Platform in use 2 2 On-site kick off meeting of Consortium WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 2 Forum organized 3 1. Online synergy meeting with Action grants WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 3 on preventing NCDs in the area of Mental health 4 1. Online Feedback meeting completed WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes and recording 6 5 2. On-site Consortium Forum meeting WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 12 completed 6 2. Online synergy meeting with Action grants WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 12 on preventing NCDs in the area of Mental health 7 2. Online Feedback meeting completed WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes and recording 18 8 3. On-site Consortium Forum meeting WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 24 completed 9 3. Online synergy meeting with Action grants WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes 28 on preventing NCDs in the area of Mental health 10 3. Online Feedback meeting completed WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes and recording 30 11 Final on-site Consortium Forum meeting WP1 1 - RPNC Meeting minutes, approval to finish project 36 completed obtained. 12 Website WP2 14 - NHF Launching the website 3 31 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Milestones Grant Preparation (Milestones screen) — Enter the info. Milestone Milestone Name Work Package No Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Due Date No (month) 13 Stakeholder Analysis WP2 14 - NHF Stakeholder Analysis report 4 14 Establishment of Stakeholder Board WP2 14 - NHF Establishment of Stakeholder Board 7 15 Final Consortium Forum Conference WP2 14 - NHF Final Conference minutes 36 16 Final battery of indicators defined. WP3 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Meeting minutes on agreement from WPL 9 17 On-line tool for data collection available. WP3 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Access of WP leaders to the web platform 14 18 Inputs of the stakeholders. WP3 17 - BIOSISTEMAK Key stakeholders (experts in JA topics) contacted 24 and interviewed. 19 Methodology for Sustainability Situation WP4 8.1 - OKFŐ Document 6 Analysis and key stakeholders’ identification 20 Methodology for Sustainability Action Plan WP4 8.1 - OKFŐ Document 12 21 Training delivery WP4 16 - NIJZ Number of trained partners: maximum 50 persons 30 22 Training report WP4 16 - NIJZ Document 33 23 Mapping review on MHIAP WP5 12 - RIVM Report 10 24 Start pilots and learning network WP5 18 - PHAS Meetings of the network of MSs 15 25 Methodology for implementation of MHIAP WP5 12 - RIVM Report 36 for Member States finalized 26 Mapping of interventions/actions in MS WP5 8.1 - OKFŐ Report 18 27 Completion of the Actions guidelines WP5 8.1 - OKFŐ Report 30 28 Digital advocacy strategy on stigma designed WP5 7.1 - ULEI Meeting with professionals and stakeholders 12 29 Completion of interviews/questionnaires in WP5 10 - ISS Report 21 MSs on training programs 30 Engagement recommendations WP5 7.1 - ULEI Report 34 32 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Milestones Grant Preparation (Milestones screen) — Enter the info. Milestone Milestone Name Work Package No Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Due Date No (month) 31 Knowledge collection on integrated care WP5 10 - ISS Report 12 pathways in EU MSs 32 Developing an European/National Health WP5 10 - ISS Report 33 Strategy for Integrated Mental Health Care 33 Online platform and guidelines for mental WP6 9 - DOHI Confirmation and go-ahead from the lead 12 health promotion for municipalities, schools, beneficiaries, guidelines sent out to participants and workplaces are ready for testing in MS for translation. 34 Workshop on how to attract and engage WP6 9 - DOHI One or more workshops have been held for 24 communities to use the platform to their Member States. Timing will be decided after advantage. project has started. 35 Workshop on transferring parts of or whole WP6 13 - NIPH ne or more workshops have been held for Member 24 interventions to other participating countries States. Timing will be decided after project has started. 36 Selected digital tools ready for piloting WP6 13 - NIPH Confirmation by lead beneficiaries and 24 participating MS that preparation is completed and for go-ahead of pilot 33 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 LIST OF CRITICAL RISKS Critical risks & risk management strategy Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info. Risk Description Work Package Proposed Mitigation Measures number No(s) 1 Delay in implementation of activities and WP5, WP6, WP1, Efficient internal communication management plan and close work with the Coordinator to deliverable. This risk is not likely due to the wide WP2, WP4, WP3 understand the reasons and provide fast and effective solutions. experience of Project partners in participating in EU The Consortium Forum will mitigate this risk ensuring a redistribution of tasks and Projects High impact. responsibilities among project partners. 2 Interdependency between WPs and between WP5, WP6, WP1, Overlapping of start and end dates for WPs’ and tasks have been planned/foreseen as much partners within WPs in terms of (timely) WP2, WP4, WP3 as possible to decrease the risk of delays in other WPs or other tasks. Regular monitoring achievement of milestones and delivery of outputs. of progress (at least monthly or more frequently when feasible) supports the identification Possible impact on (quality of) outputs and timely of potential delays and difficulties at an early stage. Established project management tools delivery. This risk has a low likelihood because will support the early identification of risks and careful planning of activities, including the under WP1, Project partners will use tools to assure JA work plan, the common implementation strategy and the Project Handbook. Discussion the delivery on quality and on time. Medium impact. of issues in the Project Core Team to find best solutions in a timely matter. Review of the timetable of activities, deliverables and milestones. 3 Challenges in interactions with stakeholders and WP5, WP6, WP1, Involve all partners, personal contacts and their networks to expand the pool of experts decision makers, low response rate from external WP2, WP4, WP3 and stakeholders. Where required, adapt/revise the dissemination plan to ensure timely experts and stakeholders to requests/ questionnaires. information and communication on the JA before requesting input, involvement or This risk has a medium likelihood and the impact on collaboration and to ensure reach out to experts and stakeholders. the finalization of project activity could be serious. 4 Underspending. This risk has a medium likelihood WP5, WP6, WP1, Regular financial control - financial reporting every 6 months. Adherence to EU Financial and impact. WP2, WP4, WP3 Guidelines. 5 Staff turnover. This risk has a low likelihood because WP5, WP6, WP1, Project status meetings at WP level to identify issues. Concerned partners commit to provide the turnover of the Partner’s staff is low. Low WP2, WP4, WP3 replacement as soon as possible and to ensure appropriate briefing and guidance to the new impact. staff based on the main JA documents and tools (Grant Agreement, Project Handbook, task and work package descriptions etc.). 6 Partner withdraws from the project because of WP5, WP6, WP1, Tasks within the WPs are assigned to leaders and co-leaders who shall work together to reach management, financial, political or any other WP2, WP4, WP3 the defined objectives and results. In case one of leading partners have to drop out of a WP reasons. This risk has a medium likelihood because 34 Project: 101162928 — MENTOR — EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Critical risks & risk management strategy Grant Preparation (Critical Risks screen) — Enter the info. Risk Description Work Package Proposed Mitigation Measures number No(s) all Partners expressed their willingness to participate or a task, it would be taken over either by the co-leader or another WP partner who will be before the project start. High impact. allocated the associated financial resources. 7 Poor availability of policymakers due to constrained WP1, WP2, WP4 All countries after the start of the project will appoint Members for the Member State capacities. This risk has a low likelihood because Policy Committee, which will ensure the project outcomes are being met according to the all Partners have direct contact with National policymaker's needs. Difficulties encountered and potential solutions will be discussed in policymakers. Low impact. Project Core Team meetings. If needed, alternatives will be found to cover the areas of expertise. Identification of political representatives that could act as ambassadors for the MENTOR. 8 Constrained capacities and resources of regional or WP5, WP6, WP1, Scope of actions in MENTOR for mental health promotion and prevention interventions for local stakeholders for transfer, pilot implementation WP2 different target groups and different life phases across the life course is suitable for transfer and evaluation. This risk has a low likelihood in wide range of stakeholders. Digital technology for optimal sharing of best practices and because all Partners have influence on Regional/ multi-lateral piloting of innovative interventions and tools will be used. A careful selection local stakeholders. Medium impact. of resources, sites and types of practice to be implemented will be necessary. 9 IT Technologies risk, technical challenges, data WP5, WP6, WP1, Use data backups, especially backup copies of all key documents. Use anti-virus to secure protection, data sharing restriction. This risk has WP2, WP4, WP3 computers, servers and wireless networks. All partners must comply with the GDPR rules. a medium likelihood and the impact on the Technical challenges of different levels, e.g. issues using shared working platform, may delay finalization of project activity could be serious. the work. However, they are considered learning opportunities. The participating institutions have skilled staff that can address the challenges. New tools, digital tools are preferably built on existing platforms. 10 Conflicts among the partners. This risk has a WP5, WP6, WP1, All the partners involved in the project are respectable professionals in their field. In medium likelihood because disagreements are part WP2, WP4, WP3 management layer a “Project Core Team” structure has been created to address and mitigate of discussions. Medium impact. any conflict questions or situations that might arise. 35 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION (PART B) COVER PAGE Part B of the Application Form must be downloaded from the Portal Submission System, completed and then assembled and re-uploaded as PDF in the system. Page 1 with the grey IMPORTANT NOTICE box should be deleted before uploading. Note: Please read carefully the conditions set out in the Call document (for open calls: published on the Portal). Pay particular attention to the award criteria; they explain how the application will be evaluated. PROJECT Project name: Mental Health Together Project acronym: MENTOR Coordinator contact: Sibilla Neimane, Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Disorders, Latvia [email protected] A TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION (PART B)....................................................................................................................... 1 COVER PAGE ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 PROJECT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 2 1. RELEVANCE ........................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and general objectives .................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Needs analysis and specific objectives ............................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Complementarity with other actions and innovation — European added value .................................................... 7 2. QUALITY ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Concept and methodology .................................................................................................................................. 7 2.2 Consortium set-up............................................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Project teams, staff and experts ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.4 Consortium management and decision-making ................................................................................................. 18 2.5 Project management, quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation strategy .............................................. 20 2.6 Cost effectiveness and financial management .................................................................................................. 21 2.7 Risk management ............................................................................................................................................. 23 3. IMPACT ................................................................................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Impact and ambition .......................................................................................................................................... 25 3.2 Communication, dissemination and visibility ...................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Sustainability and continuation .......................................................................................................................... 27 4. WORKPLAN, WORK PACKAGES, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES AND TIMING ..................................................... 29 4.1 Work plan.......................................................................................................................................................... 29 4.2 Work packages, activities, resources and timing ............................................................................................... 30 Work Package 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 31 Work Package 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Work Package 3 ............................................................................................................................................... 39 Work Package 4 ............................................................................................................................................... 43 Work Package 5 ............................................................................................................................................... 50 Work Package 6 ............................................................................................................................................... 66 Subcontracting ................................................................................................................................................. 75 Timetable ......................................................................................................................................................... 76 5. OTHER................................................................................................................................................................... 82 5.1 Ethics ................................................................................................................................................................ 82 5.2 Security............................................................................................................................................................. 82 6. DECLARATIONS ................................................................................................................................................... 82 1 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 ANNEXES ..................................................................................................................................................................... 83 #@APP-FORM-EU4H@# #@PRJ-SUM-PS@# [This document is tagged. Do not delete the tags; they are needed for the processing.] PROJECT SUMMARY Project summary See Abstract (Application Form Part A). #§PRJ-SUM-PS§# #@REL-EVA-RE@# #@PRJ-OBJ-PO@# 1. RELEVANCE 1.1 Background and general objectives Background and general objectives Describe the background and rationale of the project. How is the project relevant to the scope of the call? How does the project address the general objectives of the call? What is the project’s contribution to the priorities of the call? Growing mental health challenges are a significant concern in the EU, contributing to morbidity and imposing substantial costs on social protection systems and the economy. The COVID-19 pandemic and the conflict resulting from Russia's aggression against Ukraine have further deteriorated mental health, particularly among vulnerable groups like refugees and displaced individuals from Ukraine. Before the pandemic, mental health issues affected roughly 84 million EU citizens, costing over € 600 billion. The pandemic has intensified these issues, with 10-20% of EU schoolchildren facing mental health problems, notably anxiety and depression, affecting educational outcomes. Mental well-being declined across all age groups since 2020, with young people, those in precarious jobs, and individuals with lower education or income being especially hard-hit. Adversities such as poverty, unemployment, and social isolation are known risk factors. Situations such as crises, pandemics, stigma, climate change make them all worse. Following the EU Communication on a Comprehensive Approach to mental health, MENTOR contributes to reduce the burden of mental ill-health and promote good mental health and well-being, planning activities addressed both to the general population and to people suffering from mental issues. Thus, MENTOR aims at promoting mental health by sharing experiences from the political to the clinical professional sphere, incorporating evidence-based best practices and adapting initiatives to achieve long-term sustainability of promoting mental health and well-being both at personal and population level. MENTOR will support the Member States (MS) in the implementation of comprehensive public health policies and policy mechanisms by: i) preparing the ground for well-being and mental health resilience, by developing a Mental Health in All Policies (MHIAP) methodology, which creates favorable conditions addressing environmental and social determinants; ii) promoting mental health and preventing mental disorders with emphasis on specific vulnerable groups of population (migrants, refugees, Roma people, people displaced from Ukraine) and in particular children, adolescents, and youth of these groups; iii) enabling people with mental disorders to live their lives as fully as possible by protecting rights, enhancing their social inclusion, and tackling stigma; iv) providing equitable and timely access to high-quality mental health services able to deliver innovative interventions to set people at the center of their care and meet their identified health- and wellbeing needs. In order to improve health interventions and health promotion in MS, MENTOR will work also on the use of digital technology (such as Platforms and Apps) to build mental health services and monitoring systems for the future and take steps to develop and endorse a set of standards and principles with the aim of ensuring that digital solutions to promoting and preventative mental health actions are clinically validated, ethical, efficacious, safe, sustainable, trustworthy, and usable in open access manner. Within this framework, MENTOR includes two technical WPs reaching following goals: 1. Supported policy makers at national and regional levels in the design, implementation, and improvement of mental health in all policies approaches; 2. Promoted mental health in communities with focus on vulnerable groups, and tackling stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems and addiction by sharing good practices, methods and online tools; 3. Empowered people with lived experience (PLE) and their inclusion in mental health policy and services; 2 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 4. Provided care pathways to promote proactive and person-centered care for people with mental disorders through the Personal Health Budget; 5. Prepared systems for monitoring mental health in the population, facilitating evaluation, and directing effective action and help to vulnerable groups. Within this framework, Project Partners will resume existing policies, approaches and actions throughout the EU, referring to Best Practices Portal and fostering collaboration with active EU mental health joint actions, such as JA UME, JA impleMENTAL, and JA preventNCD, as well as with TSI 2024 Flagship “Mental health: Fostering well-being and mental health”. 1.2 Needs analysis and specific objectives Needs analysis and specific objectives Describe how the objectives of the project are based on a sound needs analysis in line with the specific objectives of the call. What issue/challenge/gap does the project aim to address? The objectives should be clear, measureable, realistic and achievable within the duration of the project. For each objective, define appropriate indicators for measuring achievement (including a unit of measurement, baseline value and target value). Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the most prevalent mental health issues in EU were anxiety and depression, with substance abuse disorders, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia also being significant concerns. Anxiety disorders were estimated to affect 25 million individuals (5.4% of the EU's total population), with depressive disorders impacting 21 million people (4.5%), and substance abuse disorders affecting 11 million individuals (2.4%). The global mental health situation has deteriorated since the onset of the pandemic, according to the World Health Organization. A Eurobarometer survey carried out in June 2023 indicated that nearly half of the EU's population (46%) reported experiencing emotional or psychosocial difficulties, such as feelings of depression or anxiety, in the past year (Flash Eurobarometer on mental health, June 2023 - European Commission). It is time to re-orient European mental health services to a recovery-based approach. MENTOR wants to support mental health services in starting a transformative process towards a recovery-oriented practice. This means understanding that each person is different and should be supported to make their own choices, listened to and treated with dignity and respect. Each person is the expert of their own life and support should assist them to achieve their hopes, goals and aspirations. The principle of person-centeredness and empowerment is central to the recovery-oriented mental health system, while the principle of hope is also essential to embracing all the other principles. PLE who have accomplished their recovery are a powerful vehicle of hope for other service users. PLE are relevant actor in evaluating which methods, approaches, structures, conditions support recovery, and which do not. This is crucial knowledge for the improvement of MH services. In MENTOR, PLE will be invited to share their knowledge and experience and cooperate to this transformative process, together with family members, carers, mental health service providers, and other actors from voluntary and community sector. In parallel, MENTOR aims at addressing needs like equitable access to care for people with mental health conditions, reduction of stigma, recovery and inclusion by implementing shared guidelines for consideration of mental health in all policies, identifying evidence-based guidelines for promotion and prevention interventions targeted to young people and vulnerable groups in general population, supporting recovery-oriented and inclusive practice in the care of people with a mental health condition, and implementing personalized and comprehensive approaches to mental health. MENTOR will deliver specific activities focused on people in need (displaced citizens from Ukraine, PLE, youths with adverse living conditions), for instance developing the methodologic frame and standard for inclusive mental health policy and then creating best practise examples in different communities, the activities is planned to be wide spectrum from seminars and lectures which are taking place in real life setting in community to PLE training groups and digital solutions. In response to the urgent need to validate; ethical, effective, safe, sustainable, trustworthy digital tools, MENTORS aims to endorse a set of standards for monitoring mental health and wellbeing and implement preventative and promotion actions by digital solutions. In this framework, MENTOR grounds its roots in the expertise and experience of the consortium members, as well as capitalizing the main results of other Joint Action projects such as JA UME, JA impleMENTAL, JA preventNCD, and the TSI 2024 Flagship on Mental health. They pave the way for the aim of MENTOR of contributing to reduce the burden of mental health problems through sharing experiences of promoting good mental health, as well as preventing mental health problems and disorders in the population, especially vulnerable groups, according to their level of needs by incorporating open access, evidence- based best practices and adapting initiatives across the EU Member States and Associated countries effectively. Specific objectives: 1. SO1. Ensure efficient dissemination of MENTOR activities/outcomes. 2. SO2. Promote the sustainability and implementation of MENTOR outcomes through the different mental health care systems across the Europe region. 3 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 3. SO3. Strengthen the capacity of mental health literacy by developing policy recommendations and intervention tools targeted to vulnerable groups and fighting stigma. 4. SO4. Contribute to increasing access to evidence-based practices and innovative approaches of mental health monitoring, promotion and prevention to manage mental health conditions in communities. 5. SO5. Improve monitoring systems of mental health to heighten awareness for mental health problems and ensure earlier detection of individuals at risk and address data driven decisions. 6. SO6. Reduce social inequalities in population targeting people with mental health issues. 7. SO7. Fostering methods to evaluate and implement MHIAP approaches at national and regional levels. TABLE 1. Planned Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and related Specific Objectives. The achievements and reaching the KPIs will be reported in the Final Evaluation report (D3.2). RELATED OUTCOMES KEY TARGET MEASUREMENT SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES INDICATORS SO1. Ensure Disseminating Organized project’s 3 Reports of dissemination efficient current information conferences and activities (D2.2.1) dissemination of about the project, events MENTOR JA participants, best activities/outcomes practices organized for international JA Consortium SO1. Ensure Disseminating Establishment of 1 Launching the project efficient current information project website website (D2.2.1) dissemination of about the project, MENTOR JA participants, best activities/outcomes practices organized for international JA Consortium and wider public, including through activity on social media SO1. Ensure Dissemination of Number of 3 Reports of dissemination efficient MENTOR presentations at activities (D2.3.1) dissemination of results/outcomes to scientific MENTOR JA community, and policy activities/outcomes scientific community discussion events and policy makers SO2. Promote the Sustainability Methodology and Completion of 2 2 methodology document sustainability and report core elements for methodology (Methodology for implementation of sustainability document; all Sustainability Situation MENTOR defined; partners have Analysis and key outcomes through commitment from formally stakeholders’ the different mental all implementation acknowledged their identification, health systems partners secured; commitment to the Methodology for across the Europe Sustainability Action sustainability of the Sustainability Action region Plans developed; project through the Plan), Sustainability stakeholder network completion of Situation Analysis established and baseline document, percentage of operational; assessment and pilot projects that have participation in the SWOT analysis; at developed and Thematic least 70% of documented workshops; a completed pilot sustainability action sustainability projects submitted plans; number of coordination body sustainability action stakeholders engaged established; plans; a diverse and actively participating consortium stakeholder in the established members trained for network, at least network; percentage of policy engagement. 70% of consortium consortium members members attend participating in thematic and actively workshops; a dedicated contribute to sustainability 4 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 thematic coordination body within workshops, the project structure; sustainability percentage of consortium coordination body members who have is formally completed online courses established; at focused on policy least 70% of engagement (D4.1.1). consortium members have undergone online courses. focused on policy engagement. SO3. Strengthen Uptake of MENTOR Number of 7 Training of different the capacity of results/outcomes by guidelines and settings (D5.2.4), Models mental health professional other documents of training and peer literacy by communities and (e.g. support tools (D5.3.2), developing policy policy makers recommendations) Guidelines and recommendations developed recommendations for a and intervention destigmatization strategy tools targeted to (D5.3.3), Knowledge vulnerable groups exchange report (D5.4.1), and fighting stigma Assessment of integrated care pathways (D5.4.3), Community-Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization (D5.4.4), Early problematic digital technology use prevention: situation analysis and recommendations for action (D6.1.2) SO4. Contribute to Identification of Number of best At least 4 Personalized prevention/ increasing access best practices and practices identified promotion interventions to evidence-based selection of best for wider (D5.2.1), inventory report practices and practices that implementation (D5.2.2), PLE innovative would allow wide involvement (D5.3.1), approaches of implementation Web resource for best mental health practice methods promotion and (D6.1.1). prevention to manage mental health conditions in communities. SO4. Contribute to Improvement of Number of Member At least 6 Pilot implementation of increasing access national/subnationa States identified good/best to evidence-based l policies and implementing best practices (D5.2), media practices and actions practices guide (D5.2.3), integrated innovative care pathways (D5.4.3) approaches of and web resources mental health (D6.1.1, D6.2, D6.3) promotion and prevention to manage mental health conditions in communities. SO5. Improve Promoted access Number of 3 Definition of an integrated monitoring systems to applicable tools innovative care pathway (D5.4.2), of mental health to and methods both approaches Online platform for ensure earlier for prevention and mental health promotion 5 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 detection of promotion in identified for (D6.2.1), Happ app individuals at risk different settings piloting and testing (D6.2.2) and address data throughout the life driven decisions. course, targeting Number of Implementation of tools diverse population measurement tools 3 to assess mental health groups across implemented problems and risk factors Europe, including through self-report from vulnerable groups Number of adolescents and adults in languages a 5 multiple European measurement tools languages (D.6.3) are available in. Number of mental 1 health surveys conducted with vulnerable populations SO6.Reduce social Improve the scope Actions to raise 5 Advocacy inequalities in and approach to awareness and communications population mental health break stigma for materials, digital targeting people problems among people with mental advocacy strategy with mental health vulnerable groups, health issues (D5.2.3) issues. stakeholders among different involved, actions targeted audiences PLE involvement promoted (D5.3.1), Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy (D5.3.3), Knowledge exchange report (D5.4.1), Community-Based Mental Health Policy Prioritization (D5.4.4) Number of mental Implementation of online health mental health assessments 1 assessment for persons implemented displaced from Ukraine. among vulnerable (D6.3.3) groups SO7. Fostering Developed and Methodology to 1 Report on state-of-the-art methods to encouraged support knowledge on evaluate and collaboration at implementation of methodology, evaluation implement MHIAP policy level among MHIAP approaches and implementation of approaches at different sectors to at national and/or mental health in all policy national and improve policies in regional level is (MHIAP) cycles in regional levels mental health and available to Europe, at national, well-being issues Member States regional and local level (D5.1.1) Piloting of MHIAP guidance at local/regional and national level (policy action) (D5.1.2) Shared learnings and identified synergies on how integrated policies may best support the promotion of equitable mental health/well- being (D5.1.3) 6 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 #@COM-PLE-CP@# 1.3 Complementarity with other actions and innovation — European added value Complementarity with other actions and innovation Explain how the project builds on the results of past activities carried out in the field and describe its innovative aspects. Explain how the activities are complementary to other activities carried out by other organisations. Illustrate the European dimension of the activities: trans-national dimension of the project; impact/interest for a number of EU countries; possibility to use the results in other countries, potential to develop mutual trust/cross-border cooperation among EU countries, etc. Which countries will benefit from the project (directly and indirectly)? Where will the activities take place? MENTOR is fully aligned with and complements public health strategies as well as other on-going investments and capacity building initiatives. Most of the planned activities have potential to exert a substantial impact on several key mental health issue across Member States and should attract interest from many countries. Specifically, there is a great effort of the EC in supporting several multifaceted initiatives on mental health, in line with WHO Mental Health Action Plan recently extended to 2030 (https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/B144_REC1_EXT-RES-DEC- en.pdf?ua=1) and with the recent WHO Report “Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person- centred and rights-based approaches”. All these European major institutions promote a view of mental health care that relies on two pillars. First, a global, whole-of-society approach to mental health based on an integrated cross-sectoral response, including not only the health sector, but also education, research, welfare, housing, and labour market policies. Second, a strong focus on community mental health programs and integration with primary care clinics and community services, which are keys to reaching a larger portion of populations and to improve access to mental health care for people with disabilities, and for neglected and at-risk populations. These two pillars are fully considered in MENTOR, which includes several initiatives aimed at actually translating these principles into practice. Obstacles to good mental health cannot be overcome within the health system alone. Hence, the June 2023 ‘Commission Communication on a comprehensive approach to mental health’ underlines the need to integrate mental health across policies and adopt a ‘mental health in all policies’ (MHIAP) approach. Actions ‘supporting favorable conditions for mental health and increasing resilience, implementing Mental Health in All Policies’ were already identified as a priority in the context of the 2022 ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD Initiative. In the consultation process linked to this initiative, MHIAP topped the list of Member States’ preferred areas for action. MENTOR follows up on this by supporting policy makers at national and regional level in the design, implementation, and innovation of MHIAP. It will gather, exchange and transfer expertise on MHIAP. It will also develop and pilot a flexible methodology to evaluate MHIAP approaches. In doing so, MENTOR will take account of the Health Policy Platform’s 2023 Joint Statement for Mental Health in All Policies as well as the recommendations for action on MHIAP that resulted from the 2013-2016 Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being. MENTOR will also build on the work on mental health literacy and MHIAP that are proposed in the JA PREVENT (expected to commence in 2024). PREVENT’s mapping activities can inform MENTOR’s national level efforts. MENTOR will, however, also include regional/local and quality perspectives, and a focus on common shared solutions and sustainability. MENTOR will also explore potential synergies with other health related initiatives capitalizing other initiatives such as the EU4Health Joint Action (ImpleMENTAL, PREVENT-NCD), Horizon Europe Program (e.g. IMPROVA, Schools4Health), EU-PROMENS, the European Alliance against depression, the EU Public Health Best Practice Portal the Erasmus+ Program (projects HOORAY, SPHERE and EASMH), the 2023 Flagship TSI Youth First, the TSI 2024 Flagship “Mental health: Fostering well-being and mental health”, as well as other international initiatives (i.e., Australia) which aim to support the wellbeing, education, training, social protection, and labor prospects of children and youth. Finally, MENTOR will include in its activities some of the tools which are being developed by the ongoing JA ImpleMENTAL, such as the dashboard of mental health indicators to contribute to a better and more efficient use of data and information for the monitoring and evaluation of intersectoral, community-based mental health promotion and care services and prevention. In addition, from the Horizon 2020 project ImpleMentAll, MENTOR will make use of the ItFits-toolkit for streamlining implementation of interventions as basis for developing guidelines for up-scaling and implementing the digital mental health services into the wider EU. In addition, the leaders of the technical working packages will coordinate their activities and explore synergies with the just started JA PREVENT-NCD. Finally, MENTOR will also seek coordination with the WHO and EU JRC by considering members from these organisations for advisory roles. #§COM-PLE-CP§# #§PRJ-OBJ-PO§# #§REL-EVA-RE§# #@QUA-LIT-QL@# #@CON-MET-CM@# 2. QUALITY 2.1 Concept and methodology 7 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Concept and methodology Outline the approach and methodology behind the project. Explain why they are the most suitable for achieving the project’s objectives. The concept of MENTOR is linked to the general and specific objectives above-mentioned, supporting the policy objective of reducing the burden of mental health problems. Specifically, the scope of the MENTOR is to reduce the burden of mental ill health through monitoring, promoting good mental health as well as preventing effectively mental health problems and disorders across the EU. The JA MENTOR is structured based on six work packages, the four mandatory WPs: Coordination (WP1), Dissemination (WP2), Evaluation (WP3) and Sustainability (WP4), plus two technical WPs (WP5 “Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions” and WP6 “Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe”). The approach includes mapping evidence-based interventions/knowledge in MHIAP, promotion/prevention, PLE inclusion in mental health services and Personal Health Budget methodology, digital mental health promotion solutions and mental health monitoring systems. On this basis, piloting activities or informed discussion among MSs will be instrumental for identification and implementation where possible of an integrated prevention/promotion/care pathway in EU Member states. Further, the development of guidelines and selection of best practices will assure a substancial advancement in the key priorities addressed by the Healthier Together Mental Health initiative. In this perspective, we are aware that shortage of mental health professionals and inequality in healthcare access are challenges that many EU MS face, which can hamper the implementation of such integrated approach. These challenges were in many cases deepened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Simultaneously, COVID 19 and social distancing speed up advances in and adaptation of digital technologies. By utilizing the advantages of digital technologies, our aim is to offer effective, decentralized solutions to support mental health and wellbeing that can easily be upscaled in a comprehensive approach to mental health. A productive interaction between the two technical WPs, assured by the planned consortium meetings and WP leaders’ continuous horizontal coordination, will allow project partners to cooperate for the implementation of harmonized and sustainable results, addressed for a large number of EU MSs. A common methodology for the activities’ implementation will be set up in WP1, with a contingency plan as well as the possibility of variation based on WP specific needs. The methodology of MENTOR will be designed and structured for: 1. Enhancing mental well-being and mitigating mental health issues by adopting the most effective and promising strategies, practices, and actionable research findings. 2. Establishing a coordinated effort across various governmental departments and key stakeholders to integrate mental health considerations into all policies. 3. Developing resources and methods to improve mental health monitoring, awareness and literacy, including early identification of individuals at risk in community environments like schools and workplaces, with special attention to the needs of vulnerable populations. 4. Enhancing access to evidence-based, innovative, and personalized mental health management strategies and treatments, including community-centered care, self-help tools, and social prescriptions for improved outcomes. 5. Establishing supportive environments for patients, their families, and caregivers, both formal and informal, aiming to enhance their quality of life and combat stigma. 6. Reduce social inequalities in population targeting people with mental health issues 7. Capitalizing good practices and assuring the complementarity with other JA such as JA UME, JA impleMENTAL, and JA preventNCD, as well as with TSI 2024 Flagship on mental health To achieve JA MENTOR results, a project methodology will be built around 4 main types of activity, each of them will be accomplished in the manner and following unite quality standards that every activity can be replicated in any MS environment 1. Events for disseminating MENTOR results/involving people/raise awareness: The aim is on the one hand to present MENTOR results/outcomes to stakeholders, general population, scientific community and policy makers; on the other hand the aim is to involve specific goals (reached with the activities in target communities for instance for PLE, in the communities with refugees or other communities where is high proportion of vulnerable groups citizens) and to raise their awareness about the importance to reduce the burden of mental health problems. All the WPs will use common methodology to communicate, as well as the same visual identity to organize such events, identifying, for each activity, the best specification based on the concept of the event (WP2, awareness campaign, WP5, etc.) 2. Identification of good/best practices: the aim is to contribute to increasing access to evidence-based practices and innovative approaches of mental health monitoring, promotion and prevention to manage mental health conditions in different communities and settings. Technical WPs will conduct analysis and mapping studies on existing good/best practices, as well as surveys and questionnaires. These activities will be made using both CAWI (Computer-Assisted 8 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Web Interviewing) and CAPI (Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing) offering efficiency and accuracy. CAWI reaches a wide audience quickly and cost-effectively online. CAPI ensures data accuracy through in-person interviews. 3. Pilot/Best practice implementation: the aim is to contribute to increasing the number of MS implementing best practices. Focused Pilots will be implemented within WP5 and WP6. For those tasks concerned, task leaders will develop the methodology plan for Pilots development, providing guidance and timeline. Moreover, Project Partners will collect (qualitative and quantitative) data to monitor the pilot advancement in order to assess their outcomes. 4. Creation of Guidelines/recommendations: several tasks aim to strengthen the capacity for mental health literacy by developing policy recommendations and intervention tools targeted to vulnerable groups and fighting stigma. Technical WPs results will create innovative approaches to improve national/subnational policies and actions. For those tasks concerned, each Task leader will develop the methodology plan for this kind of report, providing guidance and timeline. FURTHER COMMON METHOLODGY: SUSTAINABILITY, ETHICS AND GDPR In WP4 a methodology for the sustainability of project results, final recommendations and future action plans will be developed for all Partners. Elements of sustainability foreseen policy environment, ownership of sustainability and culture of communication and consensus seeking. In all WPs Project partners will use data-storage solutions, compliant with data-protection laws in different countries and with GDP regulations. The ethical standards and principles will be rigorously applied. WP leaders will monitor legal compliance, as well as the coordination of the data with the EHDS. The management approach of the JA is based on the PM2 methodology of the European Commission, adapted to the context of the MENTOR to ensure smooth management and implementation. The management structure of JA has been designed to respond to the needs of a large-scale consortium that involves a broad range of Competent Authorities and Affiliated Entities at European level for the implementation and sustainability of the MENTOR activities. The Project Handbook is one of the main real-life products of the Joint Action. It summarizes the project objectives and documents, the selected approach for achieving the project goals. The Project Handbook will be based on the Grant Agreement, which includes the agreed project work plan and budget along with other important aspects of the project, as well as the Consortium Agreement. JA Coordinator will establish user friendly Project Handbook with many of the documents being integrated in the selected project management software tool. In this way all documentation will be kept online, ensuring accessibility and an effective controlling process. The Project Handbook/project management tool will be kept up to date by the coordinators. The Project Handbook will also contain the data management plan in which technical and legal requirements for data sharing and exchange will be detailed. #§CON-MET-CM§# #@CON-SOR-CS@# 2.2 Consortium set-up Consortium cooperation and division of roles (if applicable) Describe the participants (Beneficiaries, Affiliated Entities and Associated Partners, if any) and explain how they will work together to implement the project. How will they bring together the necessary expertise? How will they complement each other? In what way does each of the participants contribute to the project? Show that each has a valid role and adequate resources to fulfil that role. Note: When building your consortium you should think of organisations that can help you reach objectives and solve problems. The MENTOR consortium is large and has extensive geographical coverage across Europe: 43 institutions across 20 countries. Each participating institution brings relevant complementary expertise and experiences to the consortium. The consortium has the optimal know-how, qualifications and resources to successfully implement the project, and has demonstrated excellent collaboration during the preparation of the proposal. This action can be best carried out by this kind of consortium of the Member States and Associated countries authorities - public health authorities as they have the required legal and technical competences and responsibilities to implement the Union policies at national level. The consortium was built with focus on inclusiveness and considering the differences by country. The participating countries and their institutes are listed below. CYPRUS, State Health Services Organisation- Directorate of Mental Health Services (SHSO-MHS), Beneficiary The Mental Health Services Directorate is the largest mental health care provider in the Republic of Cyprus. It implements policies and develops actions and programmes that promote prevention, organises and operates services and structures according to the needs of the population. The key principles of the Directorate of Mental Health Services are the improvement in accessibility, the adequate efficiency and effectiveness of services and interventions, the equality in providing care based on the needs of patients and respect for human rights. DENMARK, Southern Region of Denmark (RSD), Beneficiary RSD is represented by the Centre for Digital Psychiatry in the Mental Health Services (CEDIP). CEDIP conducts research in as well as development and implementation of digital treatment offers for patients suffering from mental health disorders. Among other treatments, CEDIP offers guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) for 9 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 anxiety, depression, and binge eating disorder (BED), online self-help for BED, and blended internet-based and face- to-face treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD) in collaboration with Danish municipalities. ESTONIA, Ministry of Social Affairs (MOSA), Beneficiary The Ministry of Social Affairs (MOSA) is a governmental authority, which main function assigned by law or pursuant to law is to exercise executive power. The mission of MOSA is to develop a living environment, where everyone has equal chances to live in dignity. The Metal Health Department is responsible for planning mental health policy and organise its implementation. The department is also tasked with planning multisectoral developments and responsibilities, involving different ministries and levels of governance. FINLAND, Finnish Institute of Health and Welfare (THL), Beneficiary The Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) is an independent state-owned expert and research institute that promotes the welfare, health and safety of the population. THL’s duties are established in the Finnish legislation. The key duty is to carry out research and expert work to prevent illnesses and social problems, develop the welfare society, support the social welfare and health care system and the social security system. In addition, THL serves as a statistical authority and maintain statistics and registers in our field, provides social and health care services and forensic medicine services for which the state is responsible and steers the national information management in social welfare and health care services, including the development of systems aimed at processing the health and welfare data of the Finnish citizens. FRANCE, French Ministry of Health and Prevention – Directorate General for Health & Ministerial Delegation for mental health and Psychiatry (MoH FR - DGS), Beneficiary (Competent authority) The Directorate General for Health, within the Ministry of Health and Prevention (MoH), develops, implements and evaluates public health measures and policies with the aim of maintaining and improving the general health status of the population through health promotion and prevention. It proposes objectives and monitors mental health policies. The Ministerial Delegation for Mental Health and Psychiatry is in charge of the implementation of the French strategy for Mental Health and Psychiatry, ensuring that it is rolled out across the country, and helping to support changes in psychiatry in order to develop high quality, diversified, and personalised medical care that is accessible to the entire population. GERMANY, Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA), Beneficiary The Federal Centre for Health Education (BZgA) is a subordinate authority to the Ministry of Health (BMG). BZgA strengthens people’s knowledge, attitudes and abilities, enabling them to behave healthily, recognise and avoid risks, and thus assume responsibility for their own health and that of others. Preventive healthcare and health preservation are the two top-priority goals of BZgA’s work. Its measures and programmes contribute to reducing the incidence of new cases of disease in key fields of education (primary prevention) and to improving the early detection of disease (secondary prevention), as well as to generally strengthening health-related potentials (health promotion). GERMANY, Medical School of Brandenburg (MHB), Associated partner MHB is running a hospital with an associated community based mental health structure. In an Integrated Working Group Mental Health*, MHB implements theory-building, applied and method-reflexive research projects. All projects involve researchers with experiential expertise and are pooled within our IAG as the Mental Health Co-Lab*. This includes joint scientific projects, e.g. methodological research, but also other activities, e.g. networking within the IAG or beyond. In most of the projects, scientific staff members work who have experience with mental crises, impairments, illnesses, or deviations from the norm. GERMANY, Senate of Bremen (SB), Affiliated entity SB is the political and administrative structure in the German country Bremen (650.000 inhabitants). The Department of health is responsible for the administration, control, planning, evaluation and funding of health measures in Bremen. The sub-department of mental health and drug addiction is focused on transformation of hospital structures in community-based services and involvement of users of mental health services (so called experts by experience) in the planning, delivery and evaluation of mental health services. The head of the sub-department has developed a training fpr experts by experience which enhances their participation in different structures. GERMANY, Universitaet Leipzig (ULEI), Affiliated entity At ULEI, the Department of Psychiatry of Leipzig University Medical Centre provides psychiatric care for a catchment area of approximately 70 000 people in Leipzig. Its research department is internationally recognized for its work on the stigma of mental illness, time trends and changes in public attitudes, and the stigma of substance use disorders in particular. Funded by the German Ministry of Health, ULEI has developed a Media Guide to stigma-free reporting on substance use disorders ULEI has built strong links to user led research groups and employs peer researchers among its staff. 10 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 HUNGARY, National Centre for Public Health and Pharmacy (NNGYK), Beneficiary NNGYK functions as a central budgetary authority being a central agency under the direction of the Minister responsible for public health. NNGYK has national competence within its scope of activities. In order to fulfil the public health goals set out in the legislation, NNGYK performs managing, coordinating and supervising activities related to public health (especially environmental and settlement health, food and nutritional health, child and young health, radiohygiene and chemical safety), epidemiology, health development (health protection, health education, health promotion), and public health administration, as well as supervision of healthcare provision; furthermore on the basis of delegated competence NNGYK carries out tasks and duties relating to occupational health (workplace hygiene, occupational medicine), exercises and executes private law rights and duties in the field of occupational health. HUNGARY, National Directorate General for Hospitals (OKFŐ), Affiliated entity The National Directorate General for Hospitals (OKFŐ) serves as the national authority for healthcare in Hungary. It operates and oversees more than 100 state-owned hospitals, playing a crucial role in the coordination, development and quality assurance of healthcare provision and services. Monitors the operation of the healthcare system, facilitates strategic government decisions concerning the revision of the healthcare provision, and contributes to the establishment of a new, integrated, transparent national healthcare system. Furthermore, OKFŐ holds responsibility for the allocation of primary care praxis rights and plays a key role in shaping Hungary’s eHealth strategy. HUNGARY, Bethesda Children's Hospital (BCH), Affiliated entity The Bethesda Children's Hospital is the only church-run children's hospital in Central and Eastern Europe that provides comprehensive care for patients up to the age of 18. The quality of paediatric care is outstanding in all areas, although their commitment to neurology is particularly noteworthy. Within their Psychosomatic Ward, they offer specialised care for children facing challenges such as dysthymia, behavioural disorders, generalised anxiety disorders and learning difficulties. The Department of Paediatric Surgery offers a wide spectrum of medical services covering general paediatric surgery, traumatology, paediatric urology and orthopaedic surgery. ICELAND, Directorate of Health (Directorate of Health), Beneficiary The Directorate of Health is a government agency headed by the Director of Health. Its principal role is to promote high-quality and safe health care for the people of Iceland, health promotion, and effective disease prevention measures. Its activities are set out in the Medical Director of Health and Public Health Act, No. 41/2007, as well as in other provisions of law and regulations. Participation in JA MENTOR is managed by the Division of Public Health. The division coordinates health promotion approaches for municipalities, schools, and workplaces in creating an environment that promotes health and wellbeing, including mental health. The Directorate of health also regularly informs and participates in governmental policymaking, including mental health and wellbeing. ICELAND, Primary Healthcare of the Capital Area, Iceland (PHCI), Affiliated entity The Primary Health Care of the Capital Area in Iceland is a network of 15 health care centers located in the capital area. They provide comprehensive and coordinated health care services based on the expertise of various professionals and interdisciplinary collaboration accessible to all residents of the capital area. The centers offer a wide range of services such as sample collection, vaccinations, consultations with doctors and nurses, skill and health assessments, mental health centers, and more. The Children’s Mental Health Centre and the Development Centre for Primary Health Care also take part in MENTOR, they work on a national level and are a part of PHCI. ICELAND, Landspitali National University Hospital (NUHI), Affiliated entity The National University Hospital of Iceland is the leading hospital in Iceland and the largest workplace for employees in health care. It is funded by the Ministry of Welfare, supervised by the Directorate of Health and provides specialized and general care and has the capacity of approx. 700 beds. The main role of Landspítali is threefold; service to patients, teaching and training of clinical staff and scientific research. Its purpose is to supply health service of the highest quality, be competitive in worldwide respective and it emphasizes on compassion, progress, safety and professionalism.Two units within NUHI’s Mental Health Services will be participating in MENTOR. ITALY, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Beneficiary The Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) is the leading technical and scientific public body of the Italian National Health Service. Its activities include research, control, training and consultation in the interest of public health protection. The ISS conducts scientific research in a wide variety of fields and provides technical support for health-related environmental surveys and for investigations of epidemics and other public health problems at national, regional and local level. ISS does training activities to address the needs of the National Health Service, cooperates with the Ministry of Health, Italian Regions and SSN to accomplish health policies on the basis of scientific evidence in the field of prevention and health promotion. ITALY, The Azienda Unità Locale Socio Sanitaria n. 4 "Veneto Orientale" (ProMIS), Affiliated entity 11 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 ProMIS is a network which involves the Italian Ministry of Health, the 21 Italian Regions, Autonomous Provinces and the National Agency for Regional Health Services (AGENAS). Its mission is to strengthen regional/national cooperation by scaling-up regional health practices and policies at EU level. ProMIS promotes the dissemination of EU policies, best practices and funding opportunities in the framework of health, research, innovation and change management. ITALY, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Città di Torino (ASL of Turin), Affiliated entity The ASL of Turin is the local health agency, covering the territory of the city of Turin, in the Region of Piedmont, North- Western Italy. Local health agencies in Italy deliver health assistance to resident people. They receive financial resources by respective Regions and ensure primary care as well as hospital and community care. Together with health assistance they may also develop projects of public health interest. al local or national level. At present the ASL of Turin is coordinating a national project on peer support in mental health services, funded by the Italian Ministry of health. ITALY, Universita' Degli Studi Di Milano Bicocca (UNIMIBI), Affiliated entity The Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca was founded in 1998 with a very precise mission: to make research the strategic foundation of all institutional activity. Today, the University of Milan-Bicocca is a multidisciplinary university that trains professionals in various fields: economic-legal, scientific-technological, medical, sociological-statistical, psychological and pedagogical. In particular, the Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods contributes to the training of professionals and to the production of knowledge and evidence with particular reference to the areas of population and society, public health, welfare, finance, markets and the energy sector. ITALY, Lombardy Region, Associated partner Lombardy Region has a long-standing expertise in the area of health information systems and specifically of those related to mental health services. It is the Italian Competent Authority for the Joint Action ImpleMENTAL (2021-2024) developing a dashboard of mental health indicators to monitor the care delivery and to evaluate the quality of the mental health care provided by mental health services. LATVIA, Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Disorders (RPNC), Beneficiary RPNC is the largest psychiatric and addiction medicine institution in Latvia and the oldest in the Baltics, opened on 21 September 1824. Nearly 7 500 inpatients are treated annually, while the number of outpatient visits per year is more than 88 000. The RPNC provides all level clinical treatment in mental health care, forensic psychiatric, psychological and complex examinations, clinical research and education base for universities in Latvia as well as collaborate with social service providers and other institutions. RPNC is providing the methodological standard development, including the development of quality criteria of mental health care in Latvia. RPNC is in the close collaboration with Ministry of Health of Latvia in developing the national mental health policy documents and initiatives and assisting with supervision new service implementation in practise. Participation in JA MENTOR is managed by experienced team ensuring wide expertise both in project management and mental health. LITHUANIA, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Lithuania (SAM LT), Beneficiary Ministry of Health of The Republic of Lithuania is one of 14 ministries of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. Its mission is long and fulfilling healthy person’s life, and it is the main body responsible for policy making, coordination and organization in Lithuania. The main objectives are to increase the longevity of healthy life, to reduce regional and other disparities, improve happiness of the population in the field of mental health, the ministry ensures policymaking in the field of mental health promotion and prevention, mental health service provision, control of tobacco, alcohol, and drugs. LUXEMBOURG, Direction de la Santé (DISA), Associated Partner The directorate of health ("Direction de la santé") is the Luxembourgish public health authority and is linked to the Ministry of Health. We define public health objectives and contribute to the national health strategy. Our missions are to measure and promote good social, mental and physical health and wellbeing, to implement disease prevention measures and public health policy, to increase health and health care quality and to promote and execute scientific research on health-related topics. The directorate of health employs over 350 professionals, most of which have a medical or scientific background. NETHERLANDS, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Beneficiary The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (Dutch acronym: RIVM) is an agency of the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. As a governmental research and knowledge institute, RIVM aims to safeguard and promote public health and environmental quality by providing scientific and policy advice related to governmental bodies at (sub)national and international level. RIVM and its staff have a track record in providing expert advice to the EC and EU agencies to the WHO and OECD, and in participating in EU-funded research and actions. RIVM’s Public Health and Health Services Division holds responsibilities on, i.e., health monitoring and reporting (also linked to mental 12 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 health), effectiveness of policy and prevention interventions, and supporting professionals and local authorities on planned, evidence-informed health promotion. NETHERLANDS, Trimbos Institute (Trimbos), Affiliated entity The Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos Institute) is one of the largest Dutch knowledge institutes in the field, sitting at the intersection of policy, research, and practice. It has over 20 years of experience across themes like alcohol, drugs, tobacco control, public mental health, gambling, and digital balance. Trimbos has a long history as a WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health and collaborates closely with education and public health institutions, municipalities, national governments, mental health services, and service user organisations. Trimbos provides technical expertise to the EC, EU organisations and governments and is active in various mental health and substance use projects throughout Europe and beyond. NORWAY, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Beneficiary NIPH is a national competence institution under the Ministry of Health and Care Services. Its mission is to produce, summarize, and disseminate knowledge to support good public health efforts and healthcare services, to contribute to better health in Norway and worldwide. NIPH supports the Ministry of Health and Care Services, the Directorate of Health, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, the Norwegian Environment Agency and other national and local authorities and services with relevant knowledge. NIPH compiles and disseminates information about health-related topics for use in knowledge-based practice and public debate. NIPH operates and develops a modern infrastructure for knowledge, including health data and digitalization. NORWAY, Statistics Norway (SSB), Affiliated entity Statistics Norway is the national statistical institute of Norway and the main producer of official statistics. SSB is responsible for collecting, producing and communicating statistics related to the economy, population and society at national, regional and local levels. Statistics Norway also conducts extensive research and analysis activities. Statistics Norway reports to the Ministry of Finance and is subject to the provisions of the Statistics Act. However, Statistics Norway is a professionally autonomous organisation, which means it can determine what it publishes, as well as how and when the publishing takes place. Statistics Norway participates actively in the international statistical cooperation. NORWAY, The Norwegian Directorate of Health (HDIR), Associated Partner HDIR is an executive agency and professional authority under the Ministry of Health and Care Services. The directorate shall improve the health of the citizens and the community as a whole through targeted activities across services, sectors and administrative levels. The Directorate shall do so by virtue of its role as an executive agency, as a regulatory authority and as an implementing authority in areas of health policy. POLAND, National Health Fund (NHF), Beneficiary The National Health Fund (Narodowy Fundusz Zdrowia – NFZ) is a public payer in Polish health care system. NFZ is an institution placed directly under the Ministry of Health and is responsible for financing health services provided to holders of public health insurance, negotiating and signing contracts with health care providers and covering the costs of health care services provided in other EU Member States to Polish citizens. NFZ develops and implements health programs and policies and conducts health promotion and prevention. NFZ has participated in many health-related projects financed by the European Commission. ROMANIA, National Centre for Mental Health and the Fight Against Drugs (NCMHFAD), Beneficiary NCMHFAD is a public institution, under the coordination of Romanian Ministry of Health. It was founded in 2009 and its main activities consist in coordination, implementation and evaluation of mental health public policy in Romania. Our mission is to contribute to the development of a mental health system, by developing and implementing policies, programs and projects in the field of mental health, so that every person has access to quality healthcare. In the past years, the NCMHFAD has also acquired experience in implementing European projects with non-reimbursable funding and seeks to upgrade public policies in mental health for improvement of the population quality of life. SLOVENIA, National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ), Beneficiary NIJZ is the central Slovene institution for public health practice, research and education. Its academic staff work on epidemiology of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health promotion, health protection, health system research and coordination of preventive programmes in primary health care. NIJZ provides research in the field of health and protects and increases the level of health of the population by raising the awareness of population and carrying out other preventive measures. NIJZ currently participates in over 75 Slovene and EU-funded projects and has a coordinator’s role in 6 prominent EU-funded Joint Actions (EPAAC, PARENT CanCon, Best ReMaP, iPAAC and CraNE). SPAIN, Instituto de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud (Biosistemak), Beneficiary Biosistemak (former Kronikgune) is the Basque Institute for Health Systems Research. The institute aims to advance in evaluating health policies and services, developing intervention models, and disseminating and analysing health 13 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 systems change and implementation. Since its foundation in 2011, Biosistemak has participated, together with Osakidetza (the Basque Public Healthcare Provider), in more than 20 projects and actions financed by different programmes and calls of the European Commission. Together, they pursue the continuous adaptation and transformation of the health system to meet the challenges facing health systems, supporting their effectiveness, efficiency, safety and sustainability. SPAIN, Subdirección General de Adicciones, VIH, ETS y Hepatitis Víricas. Generalitat de Cataluña (GENCAT), Affiliated entity The Health Department of the Government of Catalonia (GENCAT) is the main governmental health institution in Catalonia (Spain). Responsibility on mental health promotion and prevention programs relay mostly at the General Sub-directorate for Addictions, HIV, STD and Viral Hepatitis (SGAVIH), which accumulates more than 20 years of experience implementing programs different health settings, as well as participation in numerous national and international research projects. SPAIN, Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS) and Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (HCB), Affiliated entity Fundació de Recerca Clínic Barcelona-Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (FRCB-IDIBAPS) provides infrastructural and managing and logistical support to the biomedical research activities of the research groups of the Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. The interdisciplinary addictions research team dedicated to the JA has a long- standing track record of designing, implementing and coordinating both large-scale EU-funded collaborative public health projects and nationally funded translational research projects. SPAIN, Institut Català d’Oncologia (ICO), Affiliated entity The Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO) is a public non-profit centre attached to the Catalan Health Service that works exclusively in the field of cancer. ICO is the reference cancer centre for nearly 50% of the adult population of Catalonia and its approach to the disease is comprehensive, combining prevention, patient care, training, and research. The ICO Psycho-oncology Service, aimed at promoting the mental health of cancer patients/carers, is working on the analysis and implementation of national recommendations regarding psychological care for patients/carers. This experience is relevant to WP5, which will explore MS approaches to developing/integrating mental health strategies and policies. SPAIN, Fundación Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Affiliated entity The IDIVAL Group Research in Mental Disorders consists of Professionals dedicated to investigating the causes of mental disorders, improving prevention and early intervention, and enhancing successful treatments for sustained mental health. It covers 6 main lines: Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders, Neurodevelopment and Child-Youth Population, Suicidal Behavior and Suicide Prevention, Psychological Treatments in the National Health System, Personality Disorders and Neuropsychology. The group collaborates in several national and international projects and consortia such as CIBERSAM, DISCOURSE, ENIGMA, PsychUp and Origen Digital. SPAIN, Fundación para la Formación e Investigación Sanitarias de la Región de Murcia (FFIS), Affiliated entity FFIS is a public nonprofit organization which depends on the Ministry of Health of the Region. It is responsible for managing the continuing education of 21,000 professionals of SMS, promotion, development, management and dissemination of biomedical research programs and management of regional research structures in Institutions and health centers. It also develops and implements new health innovation programs for all citizens at the Region of Murcia and the management body of the Institute for Biomedical Research of Murcia (IMIB). SPAIN, Servicio Murciano de Salud (SMS), Affiliated entity SMS is a public entity responsible for health care in the Region of Murcia, integrating a total number of 11 hospitals, with 3,651 beds and 508 outpatient appointments of primary care, and providing healthcare to 1.47 million inhabitants (about 3.09% of the whole Spanish population). In the exercise of its functions, the SMS provides services and undertake the following actions: Health Promotion; Prevention of the disease; Comprehensive Primary Health Care; Specialized Healthcare; Rehabilitation; Provision of therapeutic products necessary for the promotion, preservation and restoration of health and prevention of disease; any other service or activity that is related to health. SPAIN, Servicio Andaluz de Salud (SAS), Affiliated entity Servicio Andaluz de Salud (Andalusian Health Service, SAS) is a public body providing all healthcare services to the 8.4 million inhabitants in Andalusia through a network of integrated healthcare facilities (1,518 primary care centres and 49 hospitals). The Mental Health Unit at the Regional University Hospital of Malaga, is a consolidated research group in Basic, clinical and Epidemiological Research in Mental Health, belonging to the Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA) focus on the development, validation and evaluation of digital solutions for prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment in Mental Health. SPAIN, Fundación para la Formación e Investigación de los Profesionales de la Salud de Extremadura (FundeSalud), Affiliated entity 14 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 FUNDESALUD (FS) is the Public Foundation (non-profit) ascribed to the Regional Ministry of Health and Social Services at the Government of Extremadura. FS has been performed piloting and validation of health technology in different projects. FS manage the Research and Innovation in the entire healthcare service in Extremadura, which involves over 18,000 employees, including health professionals and other staff. SPAIN, Servicio Extremeño de Salud, The Extremadura Health Service (SES), Associated Partner SES is the body in charge of the public health care system in Extremadura. It belongs to the National Health System and was created in 1986. It is attached to the Regional Ministry of Health and Social Services, and has its legal personality and treasury and powers of treasury management for its purposes. SWEDEN, Public Health Agency of Sweden (PHAS), Beneficiary PHAS is a national government agency responsible for public health practice. The overall goal is to ensure good and equal health in the population to strengthen a positive development in society. The agency´s main tasks include monitoring of population health developments, health promotion and prevention and communicable disease control and operational support. UKRAINE, State institution "Public Health Centre of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine" (PHC), Beneficiary The Public Health Centre of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine is the leading expert institution in health care, specializing in disease control, promotion of a healthy lifestyle, and mental health support. The centre’s activities aim to improve mental well-being and support people facing mental challenges. The centre actively provides support, develops rehabilitation programs, and increases awareness of mental issues, promoting a healthy mental state in the community. 2.3 Project teams, staff and experts Project teams and staff Describe the project teams and how they will work together to implement the project. List the staff included in the project budget (budget category A) by function/profile (e.g. project manager, senior expert/, junior expert, trainers/teachers, technical personnel, administrative personnel etc. — use the same profiles as in the detailed budget table, if any) and describe briefly their tasks. Provide CVs of all key actors (if required). Name and Organisa Role/tasks/professional profile and expertise function tion (country) Sibilla Neimane RPNC Project manager, Lead of WP 1, Project manager with background in public health, (LV) particularly mental health, with extensive experience in managing European co- funded projects in both the public and private sectors. Liene Sīle RPNC Scientific officer, WP 1, Psychiatrist, PhD in clinical medicine, research field- early (LV) psychosis, head of research and education department in RPNC. Expertise in new service development, starting from service design, methodology, quality and feasibility assessment, as well as monitoring, assisting the service implementation in different mental health care institutions/treatment facilities in national level. Collaborates as a psychiatric expert with WHO and professional associations in all Europe region. Linda Barone RPNC Finance coordinator, WP 1, Finance coordinator with more than 10 years’ experience (LV) in data management, financial analysis and inter and external financial reporting, budget control and analysis in the public and private sectors. From 2022, experience in business analytics at the Riga Psychiatric and Narcology Centre. Anita Daiga Finance officer, WP 1, Finance manager with more than 20 years' experience in RPNC Priežkalna financial and budget planning and resource management, in both the public and (LV) private sectors. Extensive experience in financial management and auditing at Riga Psychiatric and Narcology Centre. Inese Minajeva RPNC Legal officer, WP 1, Extensive experience in the provision of legal advice to the (LV) management of the enterprises in order to facilitate the fulfilment of legal, corporate 15 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 and administrative obligations in compliance with National and EU legislation, with more than 10 years' experience in legal field at RPNC, Lisa Leonardini ProMIS WP 1 Co-leader, Psychologist with a master's degree in Drafting and Management of (IT) European Projects. Since 2010 she has been the Technical Coordinator of ProMIS and has over 20 years of experience in the management and implementation of EU projects on social and healthcare sector. Magdalena NHF (PL) WP 2 leader. Lawyer, Director of the Office of the President of the National Health Wojdowska Fund, Manager, Manager of EU and national projects. Participant in many government teams focused on building changes in the healthcare system. She has implemented or co-implemented digital transformation projects in the Polish healthcare system and implemented EU-funded infrastructure and soft skills projects. Ane Fullaondo Biosiste WP 3 leader, bachelor's degree in biology (UAM). PhD in Genetics and Molecular mak (ES) Biology (UPV-EHU). Master's degree in research methods and evaluation of health services health economics (UNED). Scientific Coordinator in BIOSISTEMAK, Institute for Health Systems Research. Dóra Tóth OKFŐ WP 4 leader, bachelor's degree in healthcare management, master's degree in (HU) management and leadership in healthcare (Semmelweis University). Since 2018 she has been junior project manager and from 2020 senior project manager at National Directorate General for Hospitals. Has a wide experience in EU projects on healthcare sector especially on the implementation of sustainability action plans and managing sustainability work packages Matej Vinko NJIZ (SI) WP 4 co-leader, is a public health specialist working at the NIJZ, experienced in collaborative international work. He is the Deputy Head of the National Mental Health Programme 2018-208 and Head of the Mental Health Centre at the NIJZ. Gemma ISS (IT) WP 5 Coordinator, Research Director at ISS, Head of the Center for Behavioral Calamandrei Sciences and Mental Health. She has wide experience in collaborative EU projects on environmental determinants of child mental health. Nicoline RIVM WP 5.1 task leader. Psychologist. EU health policy expert. Currently strategic advisor Tamsma (NL) at RIVM with special focus on mental health. Previously: policy officer at DG SANTE (including for mental health); leadership roles in wide range of EU-funded projects and studies, and within WHO Healthy Cities network; board responsibilities in European network organizations, including as EuroHealthNet President. Jenny Telander PHAS WP 5.1 task co-leader, bachelor's degree in behavioral sciences and a master's (SWE) degree in public health, has been working at the PHAS for 17 years and is currently Deputy Head of the Unit for Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Extensive professional experience in project management, coordination and implementation within public health, prevention and health promotion, including several EU-financed projects. Orsolya Becze OKFŐ WP 5.2 task leader, PhD in Sociology, experienced project manager with extensive (HU) professional experience in social inclusion programs and health development projects. Demonstrated proficiency in managing European co-funded projects across diverse sectors, encompassing both public and non-profit sectors. Joerg SB (DE) WP 5.3 task leader, head of department of mental health, health ministry Bremen. Utschakowski Here he puts a strong emphasis on the involvement of people with lived experience in planning, delivery and evaluation of mental health services. Before working at the ministry, he was the manager of a training and research company. Here he was the manager of the EU-Project EX-IN, to train people with lives experience to become a recovery guide. The training has been established in Poland, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Italy, Austria and Germany. There are more then 40 cities in Germany where the training is regularly delivered. 16 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Giuseppe ASL WP 5.3 task co-leader, Public Health Officer working at Italian Ministry of Health. He Salamina Turin (IT) has an important experience in coordinating National and EU projects on PLE involvement Maria Luisa ISS (IT) WP 5.4 task leader, Research Director at ISS, Coordinator of the National Network Scattoni for early detection of neurodevelopmental disorders and the Observatory on Autism Spectrum Disorders. She has extensive experience in collaborative EU projects and coordinating Italian Ministry of Health projects on personal health budgeting and child psychiatry. Guido Philipp NIPH (N) WP 6 Coordinator, Research Professor NIPH, Department for Child Mental Health Emmanuel Biele and Development. He has extensive experience with leading grant-funded projects on mental health, including international collaborations within Europe and with the US, since 2007. Dora Gudrun DOHI Gudmundsdottir (IS) WP 6.1 and 6.2 task leader, WP 6 co-leader Director of Public Health at the Directorate of Health in Iceland. She is trained clinical and organisational psychologist and holds a PhD in public health. She has served as a governmental expert on mental health for the EU and on Wellbeing Economy for WHO. She has an extensive experience in leading projects and work packages in European funded projects on mental health. Heidi Aase NIPH (N) Task 6.3 leader. Department director NIPH, Department for Child Mental Health and Development. Aase is a clinical psychologist with a PhD in neurodevelopmental psychology. She has extensive experience in leading grant funded and governmental initiated large-scale projects on mental health in children and youth. Anne Reneflot NIPH (N) Task 6.3 co-leader. NIPH, Department for Mental Health and Suicide. Reneflot has extensive experience leading major projects on adult mental health. She has also participated as a partner in several EU projects. Outside resources (subcontracting, seconded staff, etc) If you do not have all skills/resources in-house, describe how you intend to get them (contributions of members, partner organisations, subcontracting, etc.). If there is subcontracting, please also complete the table in section 4. WP4, task 4.2.: To bridge the gap between our project results and policymaking, our objective is to enhance the communication skills and knowledge brokerage capabilities of our consortium members. Effective communication with policymakers is fundamental for ensuring that our project's outcomes influence policy decisions. However, within the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ), we lack the internal expertise and specialized resources to conduct this training effectively. To address this gap, we will subcontract an external training provider who specializes in equipping professionals with the skills required for effective communication with policymakers. To ensure GENCAT's effective participation in WP6 Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe, in particular in Tasks T6.2 Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental health GENCAT will be advised and supported by professional experts in the field via through minor subcontracts. The subcontract requested by FFIS is related to the costs of the intervention to be performed in the framework of WP5 Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions, concretely in Task 5.2. Supporting prevention/promotion actions targeted to young people in community setting The intervention proposed by FFIS and SMS aims to evaluate and test an intervention through digital monitoring in actions in the area of mental health to promote quality of life and promote mental health in adults (30 to 65 years) Result: Community programme for prescribing physical exercise from mental health centres, Mental Health Centers and Psychiatric Hospitals as a non-pharmacological therapy. Patients are referred to develop a group physical exercise programme, integrating (multiple pathologies, including non-psychiatric ones, in order to be inclusive and also to work with the patients' mental health as well as destigmatisation), planned and structured, supervised by a physical exercise professional and carried out in municipal sports facilities. This intervention requests the support and performance of external staff (sport physical educators) to guarantee that the intervention is carried out properly. Subcontracting is not used for management or other core activities. 17 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Experts (if applicable) Explain if national and/or international experts will be nominated by national authorities to support the project implementation. Describe the specific professional and technical expertise and experience of each proposed expert and their contribution to the project implementation. Provide CVs (if required). Minimum requirements: • Qualification: A level of education which corresponds to a bachelor's degree. • Professional experience: At least 4 years of proven experience in XXX • Other skills: ability to work in English (minimum B2 level) No additional national or international experts have been nominated by national authorities. 2.4 Consortium management and decision-making Consortium management and decision-making (if applicable) Explain the management structures and decision-making mechanisms within the consortium. Describe how decisions will be taken and how regular and effective communication will be ensured. Describe methods to ensure planning and control. Note: The concept (including organisational structure and decision-making mechanisms) must be adapted to the complexity and scale of the project. Setting up, coordinating and managing the relevant governing, executive and advisory bodies will be necessary to ensure the relevance of the activities of the Consortium are in line with the chosen strategies and work plan. The coordinator will be responsible for developing and implementing the Consortium Agreement which describes the internal arrangements and agreements among beneficiaries and their affiliated entities, the consortium management procedures, settlement of internal disputes, and any other critical aspects such as liability and confidentiality. The Consortium Agreement will be signed by all competent authorities at the start of the project to specify the project governance, the internal organization of the consortium, the management of the project, and any other key aspects. The beneficiaries will be jointly and severally liable for the technical implementation of the action. RPNC, with the support of ProMIS, will define a set of processes that guide all the project management activities, including integration, scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, communications, risk, and stakeholders. This guidance will be defined in the Project Handbook, as well there will be defined the quality criteria for results of each activity assessment. Coordinators will assure collaboration, and a focus on delivering value and impact on time and with a certain quality. In order to ensure completion of activities on time, Coordinators will integrate PM2 with Agile practices, leading to the development of the PM2-Agile variant. This integration allows for flexibility and responsiveness in project management, combining the structured approach of PM2 with the adaptive nature of Agile methodologies. The primary forms of internal communication and exchange of documents among MENTOR partners will be e-mail, web or teleconferences, file sharing (e.g. MS Teams) and project management platform transfer and face-to-face meetings. The governance and organizational structure to ensure the close cooperation between the parties is reflected in the graph 1 presented below, which defines the bodies in the Steering, Directing, Managing and Performing layers, based on the PM² methodology. The PM² methodology considers the project team has roles both from the requestor’s side (HaDEA) and the provider’s side (MENTOR Consortium). Steering Layer The Steering Layer provides general project direction and guidance. It keeps the project focused on its objectives. It reports to the European Commission. The Consortium Forum is composed of the roles defined in the Directing and Management Layers. During the Consortium Forum each WP leader will present progress made and further development planned with greater focus on implementation of the technical WPs. Directing Layer The Directing Layer mobilizes the necessary resources and monitors the project’s performance in order to implement the project’s objectives. The Directing Layer comprises the roles of Project Owner, which in the MENTOR is assumed by HaDEA, and Solution Provider – which is assumed by the MENTOR Executive Board. Managing Layer The Managing Layer focuses on day-to-day project management. It organizes, monitors and controls work to reach the intended deliverables and implements them. Members of the Managing Layer report to the Directing Layer. Performing Layer 18 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 The Performing Layer carries out the project tasks. It produces the deliverables and implements them in the organization. Members of the Performing Layer report to the Managing Layer. The Performing Layer comprises the roles of the Project Core Team - which consists of WP leaders and co-leaders. It is of utmost importance for the success of the project that there is smooth and close cooperation and good communication between these roles. Graph 1 A Kick-off meeting (on-site in M2) will ensure that project participants and stakeholders are aware of the scope of the project, the project governance structure, the roles and responsibilities of the team members as well as the project rules. During project implementation the annual Consortium Forum meetings will take place. They will not only provide a review of the project progress, but also, facilitate knowledge transfer and exchange of processes, experiences and evidence in the course of the MENTOR implementation. The Consortium Forum meeting in M36 is also referred to as the Project Final Conference. The following directing, managing, performing layers constitute the organizational structure and advisory bodies of the Consortium: Consortium Forum: Chaired by the MENTOR Coordinator, the Consortium Forum is the steering, directing and major decision-making body of the consortium where MENTOR partners meet to discuss the progress and results of the JA, mobilizes the necessary resources and monitors the project’s performance. It represents the interests of those who design, manage and implement the project’s deliverables. It takes decisions on the strategic orientation and execution of the MENTOR and provides overall strategic guidance. It also takes major decisions about the implementation and revision of the work plan. Decisions are taken by means of majority votes. The European Commission, DG SANTE and HaDEA representatives participate as observers. The Consortium Forum shall consist of one representative of each Competent Authority. Affiliated Entities can participate but have no voting rights. The body meets once a year. These on-site meetings of the Consortium Forum will take place during M2 (kick-off meeting), M12, M24, M36 and are planned to be held in Latvia, Italy, Spain and Poland respectively. In order to ensure all participants are on board with the project implementation process, MENTOR Feedback meetings will be organized online in between Consortium Forum meetings. They will be held on M6, M18 and M30. Coordinator: is the legal entity that acts as the intermediary between the members of the Parties of the Consortium and HaDEA and DG Sante. The Coordinator shall perform tasks assigned to it as described in the WP1 as well as Consortium Agreement and Grant Agreement at a later stage. The Coordinator shall report to and be liable to the Consortium Forum. The role of the Coordinator is entrusted to the Riga Centre of Psychiatry and Addiction Medicine, Latvia (RPNC) which will be responsible for overall coordination and management of the MENTOR. Project Core Team: Chaired by the MENTOR Coordinator, it is composed of the Coordinator team – project manager, project manager assistant, scientific officers and all WP leaders and co-leaders. It is the project core team which comprises the specialist roles responsible for creating the project deliverables, collaborating on the work plan on a daily basis according to methods described in Project handbook. Task Leaders may be invited to attend the meetings of The Project Core Team. The Project Core Team meetings are planned to be held every month or when feasible, but not less than once a month. 19 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Project Core Team meet online and hold short teleconferences. These meetings allow the WP leaders to have oversight of the project’s current and future activities, established results and to discuss progress and difficulties encountered as well as provide potential solutions. Meetings scheduled M6, M12, M18, M24, M30 and M36 will not be held (only if previously expressed as necessary) due to the overlapping with the Consortium Forum meetings and Feedback meetings in those months. Decisions will be taken based on consensus whenever possible. In case no consensus can be reached, decisions will be taken by majority votes. Executive Board: Chaired by the Coordinator, it will consist of work package leaders (6 people) collaborating on executive decisions regarding project implementation (e.g. shifts in budget exceeding 15%, change of personnel, etc.) before introducing such changes to Consortium Forum. The Executive Board will meet online every 3 months or upon a request from members of the Board. Stakeholders Plays an advisory role in MENTOR, gets information on project results and may participate in the Consortium Forum meetings. Stakeholders will be selected in collaboration with participating entities – preferably selecting those with most valuable contribution to the joint action and leveraging existing resources e.g. by involving Joint Action on increasing the capacity of National Focal Points – NFP4Health, and to increase the technical and scientific content of the joint action, as well as its relevance for different users in Member States. Stakeholder inclusion will enable the relevant external stakeholders to follow and contribute to MENTOR progress and discuss with JA partners the topics linked to it, as well as ensure the evaluation, dissemination and sustainability of project outputs. Moreover, it allows the stakeholders to bring in their views, interests and expectations into the project implementation and advise on issues of practical relevance/importance for achieving the expected results. Stakeholders will be invited to participate in advisory structures. Collaborating stakeholders have no contractual relationship, nor do they receive any direct EU funding. Member State Policy Committee: The Member State Policy Committee has an advisory role of political relevance, also ensuring the project deliverables reach their expected impact. It is composed of representatives nominated from the political/governmental authorities at national/regional level in participating countries with the aim to extend the benefits and outcomes to participating Member States while ensuring deliverables are in line with expected outcomes. The Member States Policy Committee will ensure the engagement of National Ministries in the implementation of the tasks described in WP5 and WP6. The aim is to reach out to and engage policymakers to reflect on and assess the policy relevance and value of MENTOR achievements, and to explore integration of the project results into national/regional policies. It is important to involve them in the various steps during the project implementation progress - ministries will be informed on the implementation process in collaboration with WP5 and WP6 and on sustainability in close collaboration with WP4, as well as for dissemination and evaluation measures with WP2 and WP3. This will ensure keeping mental health issues at the forefront of the political agenda for health during and after the completion of the Joint Action. The members will be nominated after the start of the project. #§CON-SOR-CS§# #@PRJ-MGT-PM@# 2.5 Project management, quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation strategy Project management, quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation strategy Describe the measures planned to ensure that the project implementation is of high quality and completed in time. Describe the methods to ensure good quality, monitoring, planning and control. Describe the evaluation methods and indicators (quantitative and qualitative) to monitor and verify the outreach and coverage of the activities and results (including unit of measurement, baseline and target values). The indicators proposed to measure progress should be relevant, realistic and measurable. To ensure the project implementation of high quality and completed in time, MENTOR Coordinator will provide project management plans and tools, planning, organizing, motivating and controlling the implementation process at regular intervals, both to ensure task execution according to expected results and within budget. Project Core Team meetings will be held at least once a month, internal project budget control reports will be gathered every 6 months and brief interim monitoring reports from beneficiaries submitted every 6 months as well. All the data and documentation within Consortium will be shared online using MS Teams platform. Project plans will be developed, and daily task tracking will be ensured using project management tools, e.g., MS Teams, GanttPRO or similar. Overall to ensure effective project management, quality assurance and successful implementation, the MENTOR Coordinator will: − Coordinate the Project Core Team − Execute the project plans as approved by the Consortium Forum (please see Graph 1 in section 2.4). − Ensure the effective use of the allocated resources. 20 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 − Ensure that project objectives are achieved within the identified constraints, taking preventive or corrective measures where necessary. − Manage stakeholder expectations and involvement. − Oversee the development of all management artefacts, products and secures approval from the Project Owner – HaDEA.. − Ensure the controlled evolution of products delivered, through proper and timely change management. − Perform risk management activities for project-related risks. − Monitor project status and report to the Consortium Forum on project progress at regular intervals. − Ensure conflict resolution. Conflicts will be solved at the lowest level possible. If an agreement cannot be reached at the task or WP level, the Coordinator will mediate. When required, conflicts are discussed during Project Core Team meetings. If that is not satisfactory, it is the JA Coordinator responsibility to escalate unresolvable project issues to HaDEA and/or Consortium Forum for suggesting preferable solution and, if necessary, will ask for the authorization of the European Commission for any envisaged changes. − Liaise between the Directing and Performing Layers of the project. We will promote effective communication and cooperation between consortium members on issues relevant to the project. All evaluation steps and methodological actions will be described in MENTOR handbook and will be easily accessible for any involved participant. Regular meetings, workshops or specific communication channels can facilitate knowledge sharing and coordination, helping to manage financial resources efficiently. Transnational meetings and educational events during the project period are also necessary to maintain the quality of work and motivation in the partnership and to maintain team spirit. The evaluation strategy of MENTOR involves the Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) guiding the JA evaluation process, the analysis of the project activities ensuring the quality assessment and compliance of the project process and the study of MENTOR impact based on an Impact Assessment Plan (IAP). The PEP will guide the assessment of the level of the JA's performance and guarantee the project activities monitoring process. Progress monitoring will provide a systematic quality and compliance assessment of the project to verify its planned implementation, the achievement of the objectives and milestones and the submission of deliverables to the EC. A comprehensive approach will be employed to provide key information to the partners, to overcome the detected limitations and to strengthen the development of activities. WP3, in collaboration with WP Leaders (WPL), will support the quality assessment. The impact assessment consists of the assessment plan and the data collection. The former will be defined by (process, output, outcome and impact) indicators, target levels for the impact indicators, the information to be collected and the collection methods or sources. The latter will gather information according to the assessment plan, analyse data and report. The definition of indicators will be based on the objectives, expected results and activities of the different WPs. WP3, in collaboration with WPL, have identified an initial proposal of indicators (process, output, outcome and impact). This draft version will be the starting point on which to work. During the progress and achievement of the JA, WPL, in collaboration with the WP3 leaders, will redefine, adjust and specify the final indicators, targets and measuring instruments to be used as central elements of the IAP. WPL will provide the corresponding information included in the IAP via an online tool. WP3 will review and clean the collected data and adapt it to the appropriate quantitative and qualitative analysis format. In addition to WPL, MSs and Associated countries participating in MENTOR, represented by their CA, will play an active role in WP3, providing support in defining the evaluation framework and the impact assessment. #§PRJ-MGT-PM§# #@FIN-MGT-FM@# 2.6 Cost effectiveness and financial management Cost effectiveness and financial management Describe the measures adopted to ensure that the proposed results and objectives will be achieved in the most cost-effective way. Indicate the arrangements adopted for the financial management of the project and, in particular, how the financial resources will be allocated and managed within the consortium. Do NOT compare and justify the costs of each work package but summarize briefly why your budget is cost effective. To ensure that the objectives and results of the project are achieved in the most cost-effective way, a number of measures will be taken: 1. Budget planning. Detailed budgeting is essential for effective cost management. This will include the assessment of costs associated with the various project activities, including staff, equipment, materials and other relevant expenditure. Budgeting and estimates of financial expenditures are based on the most economically feasible planning. 21 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 1.1 The budget shall be prepared on a pro rata basis for all Project Partners, according to the responsibilities and activities foreseen in the Project. Responsibilities and tasks shall be distributed proportionally in order to involve all Project Partners in the implementation of the Project activities. 1.2 Budget calculations shall be based on the actual time required to carry out the planned activities and on the experience of the partner, using as little subcontracting as possible. 2. Clear project objectives and milestones are defined to achieve the desired results, allowing better planning, resource allocation and cost estimation. Coordinator along with WP leaders will ensure that expenditure incurred under the project is directly linked to the achievement of the project objectives and in line with the conditions for the use of the funds allocated for the implementation of the project. 3. Financial accounting. We will provide separate accounting records for each project expenditure, or an appropriate system of accounting codes for all project-related transactions. The utmost care will be exercised in the use of the funds granted. 4. Staff. Staff costs are not foreseen for maximum rates for all partners. Subcontracting is foreseen only for those aspects requiring quality and external expertise. 5. Optimisation of resources. Maximising the use of available resources is important for cost-effectiveness. This will be achieved through careful management and planning of the workforce, equipment and materials involved in the project. Efficient allocation and use of project resources will minimise costs. This includes identifying the essential resources needed for the project and optimising their allocation based on project needs and priorities. Maximum prudence will be exercised in the use of the allocated funds. 6. Risk management. Identifying and managing potential risks is essential for effective project implementation. We will identify and mitigate project risks that may lead to cost overruns or financial uncertainty. By proactively managing risks, we will minimise potential disruptions and control associated costs. 7. Competitive procurements. We will put in place competitive procurement processes to obtain goods and services at the best possible prices. This may include requesting multiple bids, negotiating with suppliers or holding open tenders to ensure cost competitiveness. 8. Monitoring and control. We will establish a robust monitoring and control mechanism to keep track of project costs, progress and results. Regular monitoring will allow indicating any deviations from the budget or planned targets to be detected in due time, thus allowing corrective actions to be taken immediately. 8.1. The project partners are responsible for their individual financial and administrative management as well as for the fulfilment of tasks and delivery of outputs described in the application. 8.2 Financial reports for internal purposes will be submitted every six months. 8.3 The WP Leader will make a presentation for the quarter of the current year on the work done during the quarter (upcoming actions, changes from plan, financial resources acquired, problems and their solutions). 9. Communication and cooperation. In order to find the best and most cost-effective solution, transnational project meetings are then complemented by public international events such as seminars and conferences. Regarding financial management of projects within the consortium, the following measures will be applied: 10. Consortium agreement. The consortium members will conclude a contract defining the financial responsibilities, rights and obligations of each party. This agreement will include provisions on financial contributions, reimbursement procedures and financial reporting requirements. 11. Budget breakdown. We have established a detailed budget that clearly indicates how the financial resources will be distributed among the consortium members. The budget considers the specific tasks, deliverables and milestones of each partner, ensuring an equitable distribution of financial resources. 12. Cost sharing and reimbursement. We will develop procedures for the sharing and reimbursement of costs between consortium members. We will clearly define eligible expenses, reimbursement rates and submission deadlines to ensure accurate and timely financial transactions. 13. Financial reporting. To ensure transparency and accountability within the consortium, we will introduce financial reporting, which will include periodic financial reports on expenditure and budget use. Clear reporting mechanisms will help to monitor the financial situation of the project and identify any deviations or problems immediately. 14. Audit and control. Periodic audits will be carried out to verify the proper use of financial resources and compliance with financial management policies. Audits ensure compliance and help identify any financial irregularities or inefficiencies. 14.1 Periodic audits will be carried out once a year by each WP Leader, providing assurance that financial resources have been used in accordance with the purpose of the project. The Beneficiary(ies) shall be solely responsible for ensuring that the financial information provided in the financial statements is correct and accurate. 22 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 14.2 For the final audit of the project, the services of a certified auditor should be engaged to provide a sworn audit opinion, the purpose of which is to verify the expenditure, as a task to carry out certain agreed procedures on the financial statement between the WP Leader and the "contracting authority" and the European Commission. 15. Financial control. We will put in place internal controls to manage and monitor financial transactions within the consortium. This will include the appointment of a financial manager responsible for overseeing financial operations, reviewing expenditure claims and ensuring compliance with financial policies and regulations. 16. Unexpected events. The budget is balanced, and financial resources are distributed in such a way that each partner has sufficient and appropriate resources for the planned work. When allocating the budget, national-level needs and the resources needed to meet them were considered, as well as partners' contributions to general work packages. Therefore, the budget is realistic and the possibility of carrying out work is ensured. The coordinator manages the project budget and ensures timely action and communication on all financial aspects of the project, and all partners are well versed in cost eligibility rules. By implementing these activities, project participants will improve cost-effectiveness, ensure adequate financial management and increase the likelihood of achieving the proposed results and objectives. #§FIN-MGT-FM§# #@RSK-MGT-RM@# 2.7 Risk management Critical risks and risk management strategy Describe critical risks, uncertainties or difficulties related to the implementation of your project, and your measures/strategy for addressing them. Indicate for each risk (in the description) the impact and the likelihood that the risk will materialise (high, medium, low), even after taking into account the mitigating measures. Note: Uncertainties and unexpected events occur in all organisations, even if very well-run. The risk analysis will help you to predict issues that could delay or hinder project activities. A good risk management strategy is essential for good project management. Risk Description Work Proposed risk-mitigation measures No package No 1 Delay in implementation of WP1, WP2, Efficient internal communication management plan and close activities and deliverable WP3, WP4, work with the Coordinator to understand the reasons and WP5, WP6 provide fast and effective solutions. This risk is not likely due to the wide experience of Project The Consortium Forum will mitigate this risk ensuring a partners in participating in EU redistribution of tasks and responsibilities among project Projects High impact. partners. 2 Interdependency between WPs WP1, WP2, Overlapping of start and end dates for WPs’ and tasks have and between partners within WP3, WP4, been planned/foreseen as much as possible to decrease the WPs in terms of (timely) WP5, WP6 risk of delays in other WPs or other tasks. Regular monitoring achievement of milestones and of progress (at least monthly or more frequently when delivery of outputs. Possible feasible) supports the identification of potential delays and impact on (quality of) outputs difficulties at an early stage. Established project management and timely delivery. tools will support the early identification of risks and careful planning of activities, including the JA work plan, the common This risk has a low likelihood implementation strategy and the Project Handbook. because under WP1, Project Discussion of issues in the Project Core Team to find best partners will use tools to assure solutions in a timely matter. Review of the timetable of the delivery on quality and on activities, deliverables and milestones. time. Medium impact. 3 Challenges in interactions with WP1, WP2, Involve all partners, personal contacts and their networks to stakeholders and decision WP3, WP4, expand the pool of experts and stakeholders. Where required, makers, low response rate from WP5, WP6 adapt/revise the dissemination plan to ensure timely external experts and information and communication on the JA before requesting stakeholders to requests/ input, involvement or collaboration and to ensure reach out to questionnaires experts and stakeholders. This risk has a medium likelihood and the impact on the 23 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 finalization of project activity could be serious. 4 Underspending WP1, WP2, Regular financial control - financial reporting every 6 months. WP3, WP4, Adherence to EU Financial Guidelines. This risk has a medium WP5, WP6 likelihood and impact. WP1, WP2, 5 Staff turnover WP3, WP4, Project status meetings at WP level to identify issues. Concerned partners commit to provide replacement as soon This risk has a low likelihood WP5, WP6 as possible and to ensure appropriate briefing and guidance because the turnover of the to the new staff based on the main JA documents and tools Partner’s staff is low. Low (Grant Agreement, Project Handbook, task and work package impact. descriptions etc.). WP1, WP2, 6 Partner withdraws from the WP3, WP4, Tasks within the WPs are assigned to leaders and co-leaders project because of WP5, WP6 who shall work together to reach the defined objectives and management, financial, political results. In case one of leading partners have to drop out of a or any other reasons. WP or a task, it would be taken over either by the co-leader or another WP partner who will be allocated the associated This risk has a medium financial resources. likelihood because all Partners expressed their willingness to participate before the project start. High impact. 7 Poor availability of policymakers WP1, W2, All countries after the start of the project will appoint Members due to constrained capacities WP4 for the Member State Policy Committee, which will ensure the project outcomes are being met according to the This risk has a low likelihood policymaker's needs. Difficulties encountered and potential because all Partners have direct solutions will be discussed in Project Core Team meetings. If contact with National needed, alternatives will be found to cover the areas of policymakers. Low impact. expertise. Identification of political representatives that could act as ambassadors for the MENTOR. 8 Constrained capacities and WP1, WP2, Scope of actions in MENTOR for mental health promotion and resources of regional or local WP5, WP6 prevention interventions for different target groups and stakeholders for transfer, pilot different life phases across the life course is suitable for implementation and evaluation transfer in wide range of stakeholders. Digital technology for optimal sharing of best practices and multi-lateral piloting of This risk has a low likelihood innovative interventions and tools will be used. A careful because all Partners have selection of resources, sites and types of practice to be influence on Regional/local implemented will be necessary. stakeholders. Medium impact. 9 IT Technologies risk, technical WP1, WP2, Use data backups, especially backup copies of all key challenges, data protection, WP3, WP4, documents. Use anti-virus to secure computers, servers and data sharing restriction WP5, WP6 wireless networks. All partners must comply with the GDPR rules. Technical challenges of different levels, e.g. issues This risk has a medium using shared working platform, may delay the work. However, likelihood and the impact on the they are considered learning opportunities. The participating finalization of project activity institutions have skilled staff that can address the challenges. could be serious. New tools, digital tools are preferably built on existing platforms. 10 Conflicts among the partners All the partners involved in the project are respectable WP1, WP2, professionals in their field. In management layer a “Project This risk has a medium WP3, WP4, Core Team” structure has been created to address and likelihood because WP5, WP6 mitigate any conflict questions or situations that might arise. disagreements are part of discussions. Medium impact. #§RSK-MGT-RM§# #§QUA-LIT-QL§# #@IMP-ACT-IA@# 24 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 3. IMPACT 3.1 Impact and ambition Impact and ambition — Progress beyond the state-of-the-art Define the short, medium and long-term effects of the project. Who are the target groups? How will the target groups benefit concretely from the project and what would change for them? Does the project aim to trigger change/innovation? If so, describe them and the degree of ambition (progress beyond the status quo/state- of-the-art). This Joint Action aims to have an impact at the policy and practice level in Europe in several ways. First, there is a global consensus that people with lived experience of mental health conditions must play a substantial role in shaping mental health policies and their implementation. They carry unique knowledge and expertise and are the ultimate beneficiaries of the actions within these policies. This Joint Action will pilot different organisational forms and activities that involve persons with lived experience in shaping mental health services and in decision making processes. Results will be used to generate recommendations for stakeholders on how to continue to (better) involve people with lived experience into policy and service design and different approaches that might work in different contexts in Europe. Second, there is clear recognition at the EU level of the benefits of a mental health for all policies approach, as underlined via the Commission’s own June 2023 Communication as well as the co-creation process of the Healthier Together Initiative. The existing body of knowledge as regards MHIAP is, however, not as well-developed as its ‘general’ counterpart (HIAP). MENTOR will bring the latest theoretical and practical insights together, maximize opportunities for cross-national learning between partner countries, and deliver a methodology ready for countries to use in order to improve their own integrated policy development and implementation. Third, internet-based technology has an increasing influence on mental health: On the one hand, problematic internet use can lead to mental health problems. On the other hand, internet-based technologies can reduce the cost of mental health related activities, facilitate transfer of tools between countries, and support scaling up activities. MENTOR will build the foundation for initiatives that counteract effects of problematic social media use, pilot evidence-based tools for mental health prevention and assessment and make such tools available for member states in multiple languages. Fourth, MENTOR foresees the sharing among MS of innovative practices to set people at the centre of their care and meet their identified health and wellbeing needs. The Personal Budget - which consists of the sum of human, technical, and economic resources allocated to an individual with the specific goal of meeting personal health and social needs - is one example. Although the adoption of Personal Budget for health and social care is a challenge for mental healthcare systems, implying a change from the traditional care model, participating MSs will learn in this JA from other MS where Personal Budget is being applied successfully in community settings. Overall, this Joint Action will consider a broad scope of actions and mental health promotion and prevention interventions for different target groups, especially vulnerable groups (youth, migrants, refugees, ROMA people and persons displaced from Ukraine), and different life phases across the life course and is not limited to one target group. An important approach to this is to capitalize on digital technology for optimal sharing of best practices and multi-lateral piloting of innovative interventions and tools followed by exchange of experience, thereby creating learning environments across MS. Finally, this JA will pilot digital solutions to assess as well as improve mental health across MS. This will provide health authorities across EU with tools for monitoring the effects of universal preventative and promoting initiatives, or the effect on the population’s mental health following societal events of great consequence. As such, this JA will contribute a broad set of lessons learned, knowledge and tools that can more broadly benefit policy actions at the MS and EU level in mental health. Short term impact: − Evidence from the evaluation of real practices piloting different organisational forms and activities that embed persons with lived experience in shaping mental health services and in decision making processes. − Sharing of latest theoretical and practical insights about promotion of mental health and preventative measures for cross-national learning between MS. − Methodology ready for countries to use to improve their own integrated policy development and implementation. − Application of personal budget in community settings. − Digital tools to promote mental health, adapted to different countries − Evidence based digital tools to assess mental health across Europe and mapping of mental health status of youths displaced from Ukraine Medium term impact: − Policy makers enhanced with knowledge of MHIAP at national and regional levels in the design, implementation and knowledge (policy makers) − Promoted mental health in communities with focus on vulnerable groups, and tackling stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems and addiction. 25 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 − Empowered people with lived experience (PLE) and their inclusion in mental health policy and services. − Recommendations for stakeholders on how to continue to (better) embed people with lived experience into policy and service design and different approaches that might work in different contexts in Europe. − Provided care pathways to promote proactive and person-centred care for people with mental disorders through the Personal Health Budget. − Increases accessibility of digital tools for mental health prevention on the individual and organizational level − Prepared systems for monitoring mental health in the population, facilitating evaluation, and directing effective action and help to vulnerable groups. Long term impact: − The involvement of PLE used widely in Europe shaping mental health policies. − Europe reduces the social inequalities in mental health. − Long-term implementation and sustainability in everyday work of mental health specialists of MENTOR outcomes (methodologies, best practices, clinical assessment tools). − Mental health improves across Europe. #§IMP-ACT-IA§# #@COM-DIS-VIS-CDV@# 3.2 Communication, dissemination and visibility Communication, dissemination and visibility of funding Describe the communication and dissemination activities which are planned in order to promote the activities/results and maximise the impact (to whom, which format, how many, etc.). Clarify how you will reach the target groups, relevant stakeholders, policymakers and the general public and explain the choice of the dissemination channels. Describe how the visibility of EU funding will be ensured. All JA MENTOR actions will be actively promoted on communication channels and on relevant regional, national or European events to maximise the impact of the project, to increase its visibility, and to ensure that project outputs reach a wide audience of relevant stakeholders. One of the project’s tasks is ‘building the brand’ that is recognised, so as part of visibility the logo and the project’s name will be created and promoted consistently during all activities. The MENTOR work plan entails a communication and dissemination activities aiming at designing and implementing internal and external communication and dissemination activity centred on the project itself and brand identity, the activities are e.g. identification of key stakeholders, stratification of actions to identified target groups, use of digital solutions, participation to key events, etc. In WP2, a detailed Communication and Dissemination Plan (CDP) will be developed. The project’s communication plan will include a section and web-based platform dedicated to the internal consortium communication, meant to set the ground rules necessary to ensure that all partners are well-informed about upcoming events, have access to all project documents, as well as to steering decisions, in a timely manner. Rules for handling confidential matter will be decided and a standardized dissemination release process will be implemented according to the rules stipulated in the Consortium Agreement. The consortium will have a shared platform for collaborative assembly. All public releases of information will be disseminated by each consortium members via its usual channel, as well as during other meetings. External communication activities will be organised through specific target groups. In fact, external communication will be designed, in the CDP, tailored on the specific target groups such as funding-, policy-, decision-makers, vulnerable group of people, regional/local authorities, and general public – especially people with lived experience and their families. All project participants will take part in the communication and dissemination activities under the coordination of NFZ (Poland) as leader of WP2. The communication plan will detail the actions carried out and the tools (public website, videos, social networks, etc.) deployed for properly informing about the MENTOR, its goals, activities and results. The communication actions in WP2 will have the following forms: − Public project updates via the project’s partners’ websites, the MENTOR website, email newsletter and social networks and other papers and/or press releases highlighting the project achievements. − The Knowledge Transfer and Capacity Building HUB will be available to JA partners during the JA and the public access will be open at the end of the JA. The HUB will contain indicators, strategies and other materials developed during the implementation of the project, available to all interested parties. The HUB will aim to strengthen external communication. JA will develop online tutorials and webinars to keep the hub operating on its own with minimal input from the JA consortium after the JA lifetime. − 3 consortium meetings. − Interaction with multiple stakeholders at the meetings, European and international conferences and other events. In particular cooperation with members of the consortium we will develop a cycle of 4 web-based information and consultation sessions informing the public (NGOs representing vulnerable groups, patient organisations, PLEs) about the project and its deliverables (e.g. the digital tool) to be carried out in countries participating in the project. Additional online information and consultation sessions (cycle of 2) will also be organised for health professionals and other people dealing with the implementation of mental healthcare on project results and deliverables (integrated care pathway, guidelines) in all the countries represented by the Consortium. 2 web- based conferences involving policy and decision makers, representatives of PLE and representatives of other 26 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 JA dealing with mental health will be organised in order to promote the project and its results as well as dialogue between different stakeholders. The final conference at European/international level will be organized by M36. All dissemination activities will be summarised in the Dissemination & Communication outcomes report. During all phases of the project the main aim will be to create awareness on the area of mental health and all partners will participate in communication and dissemination efforts to different degrees to create knowledge, solutions and good practices on the field of mental health. #§COM-DIS-VIS-CDV§# #@SUS-CON-SC@# 3.3 Sustainability and continuation Sustainability, long-term impact and continuation Describe the follow-up of the project after the EU funding ends. How will the project impact be ensured and sustained? What will need to be done? Which parts of the project should be continued or maintained? How will this be achieved? Which resources will be necessary to continue the project? How will the results be used? Are there any possible synergies/complementarities with other (EU funded) activities that can build on the project results? MENTOR will establish a sustainability methodology that defines the scale-up implementation and long-term adoption of the pilots after the JA ends. The project has dedicated an entire Work Package (WP4) to this task, to creating financial, societal, and environmental sustainability for MENTOR. Overall, the WP4 is based on the following approach: 1) facilitating the sustainability of pilot implementations beyond the conclusion of MENTOR 2) enhancing the competencies of MENTOR consortium members in efficient research-to-policy interactions and communications; 3) engaging and advocating relevant national and international stakeholders through thematic workshops and policy dialogues to enhance sustainability; 4) aligning and collaborating with other EU-funded projects involving mental health to explore potential synergies for high level policy sustainability. This approach ensures the continued impact of the project and maintains alignment with the overall strategy. Support of sustainability of MENTOR pilot implementations The MENTOR project endeavours to forge a sustainability framework for mental health initiatives at pilot sites, leveraging insights from prior Joint Actions and reports from esteemed entities such as OECD and the EU JRC. Central to this endeavour is conducting a Sustainability Situation Analysis to assess ongoing initiatives, which will include integrating baseline assessments and SWOT analyses, building upon the recent MS survey conducted by WHO in collaboration with the EU-commission, within the framework of DG SANTE's PHEG, mapping the mental health landscape. Additionally, the project entails evaluating pilot initiatives towards sustainability by incorporating actions into implementation plans and using measurement instruments from the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP). Moreover, the Sustainability Action Plan develops tailored strategies based on evaluation findings, while the Final Sustainability Report synthesises insights and recommendations poised to amplify pilot results and seamlessly integrate them into post-project policy endeavours. Bridging the Research-Policy Divide through Skill Development The MENTOR project aims to enhance the translation of pilot findings into sustainable policy changes at local, regional, and national levels by improving consortium members' and public health experts' competencies. This involves pre- and post-assessments of training to gauge shifts in participants' skills and perceptions through surveys, interviews, and focus groups. The training focuses on four key skill areas: engagement with policymakers and stakeholders, communication skills, interpersonal skills, and advising policymakers. Through interactive online courses, participants will develop proficiency in these areas to effectively convey project findings, foster collaboration, and provide evidence-informed policy advice. Enhanced communication will facilitate ongoing dialogue, ensuring project findings continue to influence mental health policy. Online courses, each lasting 2 days, will be provided to train maximum 50 individuals involved in pilot and project implementations. Strategic stakeholder engagement and advocacy through thematic workshops and policy dialogues to enhance sustainability The project aims to strategically engage stakeholders at national and international levels to enhance the sustainability of mental health initiatives. This task focuses on facilitating stakeholder understanding, empowerment, and advocacy through thematic workshops and policy dialogues. Stakeholders, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers, community leaders, advocacy groups, and individuals with lived experience, will be involved to ensure diverse perspectives. The methodology involves developing stakeholder networks, conducting preparatory work, and executing workshops aligned with key thematic areas identified in previous project phases. Post-workshop actions will include producing summary reports, developing action plans, and encouraging continued collaboration through partnerships and networks to advance shared goals in mental health system development. Collaboration between joint actions related to mental health to foster highlevel policy sustainability 27 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 The proposal aims to enhance collaboration among JA MENTOR, JA impleMENTAL, and JA preventNCD to bolster the sustainability of mental health policies across the EU. By capitalizing on synergies such as aligning messaging to policymakers, sharing tools, and co-hosting events, this task seeks to amplify the impact of collective efforts. The establishment of a sustainability coordination body comprising coordinators and WP4 leaders from each JA will facilitate annual online meetings to monitor progress, share best practices, and identify synergies. Through inclusive discussions, diverse perspectives will be incorporated, fostering collaborative solutions and ensuring widespread adoption of mental health approaches across the EU. In conclusion, MENTOR is poised to establish a robust sustainability methodology that ensures the scalability and enduring adoption of its pilot initiatives long after the project concludes. By facilitating the sustainability of pilot implementations, enhancing the competencies of consortium members, engaging relevant stakeholders, and aligning with other EU-funded mental health projects, MENTOR paves the way for continued impact and alignment with broader policy strategies. By bridging the research-policy gap through skill development initiatives, the project empowers participants to effectively translate findings into sustainable policy changes. Strategic stakeholder engagement and advocacy efforts further bolster sustainability by fostering understanding, empowerment, and collaboration at national and international levels. Additionally, collaboration between joint actions related to mental health strengthens high-level policy sustainability by capitalising on synergies and promoting collective efforts. Through these concerted efforts, MENTOR not only ensures the continuation of its pilot initiatives but also contributes to the broader landscape of mental health policy sustainability across the European Union. #§SUS-CON-SC§# 28 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 #@WRK-PLA-WP@# 4. WORKPLAN, WORK PACKAGES, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES AND TIMING 4.1 Work plan Work plan Provide a brief description of the overall structure of the work plan (list of work packages or graphical presentation (Pert chart or similar)). No. Work package name Task leader Task co-leader WP 1 Project management and coordination Latvia (RPNC) Italy (ProMIS) WP 2 Dissemination Poland (NHF) - WP 3 Evaluation Spain (Biosistemak) - WP 4 Sustainability Hungary (OKFŐ) Slovenia (NIJZ) WP 5 Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions Italy (ISS) - WP 5.1 Advancing mental health in all policies: methods to evaluate and implement MHIAP approaches at The Netherlands (RIVM) Sweden (PHAS) national and regional levels WP 5.2 Supporting prevention / promotion actions targeted to young people in community setting Hungary (OKFŐ) - WP 5.3 Involvement and joint ownership of people with lived experience (PLE) in the mental health policies Germany (SB) Italy (ASL Turin) WP 5.4 Integrated care pathway for promoting social inclusion and quality of life of people with Mental Health Italy (ISS) - disorders WP 6 Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe Iceland (Directorate of Norway (NIPH) Health) WP 6.1 Overview of existing effective and efficient strategies: Mental health promotion and PDTU Iceland (Directorate of - Health) 29 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 WP 6.2 Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental health Iceland (Directorate of Health) WP 6.3 Innovative, best practice solutions to assessing and monitoring the mental health status across Norway (NIPH) - Europe 4.2 Work packages, activities, resources and timing WORK PACKAGES Work packages This section concerns a detailed description of the project activities. Group your activities into work packages. A work package means a major sub-division of the project. For each work package, enter an objective (expected outcome) and list the activities, milestones and deliverables that belong to it. The grouping should be logical and guided by identifiable outputs. Projects should normally have a minimum of 2 work packages. WP1 should cover the management and coordination activities (meetings, coordination, project monitoring and evaluation, financial management, progress reports, etc) and all the activities which are cross-cutting and therefore difficult to assign to another specific work package (do not try splitting these activities across different work packages). WP2 and further WPs should be used for the other project activities. You can create as many work packages as needed by copying WP1. For very simple projects, it is possible to use a single work package for the entire project (WP1 with the project acronym as WP name). Work packages covering financial support to third parties ( only allowed if authorised in the Call document) must describe the conditions for implementing the support (for grants: max amounts per third party; criteria for calculating the exact amounts, types of activity that qualify (closed list), persons/categories of persons to be supported and criteria and procedures for giving support; for prizes: eligibility and award criteria, amount of the prize and payment arrangements). Enter each activity/milestone/output/outcome/deliverable only once (under one work package). Ensure consistence with the detailed budget table (if applicable). Objectives List the specific objectives to which the work package is linked. Activities and division of work (WP description) Provide a concise overview of the work (planned tasks). Be specific and give a short name and number for each task. Show who is participating in each task: Coordinator (COO), Beneficiaries (BEN), Affiliated Entities (AE), Associated Partners (AP), indicating in bold the task leader. Add information on other participants’ involvement in the project e.g. subcontractors, in-kind contributions. Note: In-kind contributions: In-kind contributions for free are cost-neutral, i.e. cannot be declared as cost. Please indicate the in-kind contributions that are provided in the context of the work package. 30 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 The Coordinator remains fully responsible for the coordination tasks, even if they are delegated to someone else. Coordinator tasks cannot be subcontracted. If there is subcontracting, please also complete the table below. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestones are control points in the project that help to chart progress (e.g. completion of a key deliverable allowing the next phase of the work to begin). Use them only for major outputs in complex projects, otherwise leave the section empty. Please limit the number of milestones by work package. Means of verification are how you intend to prove that a milestone has been reached. If appropriate, you can also refer to indicators. Deliverables are project outputs which are submitted to show project progress (any format). Refer only to major outputs. Do not include minor sub-items, internal working papers, meeting minutes, etc. Limit the number of deliverables to max 10-15 for the entire project. You may be asked to further reduce the number during grant preparation. For deliverables such as meetings, events, seminars, trainings, workshops, webinars, conferences, etc., enter each deliverable separately and provide the following in the 'Description' field: invitation, agenda, signed presence list, target group, number of estimated participants, duration of the event, report of the event, training material package, presentations, evaluation report, feedback questionnaire. For deliverables such as manuals, toolkits, guides, reports, leaflets, brochures, training materials etc., add in the ‘Description’ field: format (electronic or printed), language(s), approximate number of pages and estimated number of copies of publications (if any). For each deliverable you will have to indicate a due month by when you commit to upload it in the Portal. The due month of the deliverable cannot be outside the duration of the work package and must be in line with the timeline provided below. Month 1 marks the start of the project and all deadlines should be related to this starting date. The labels used mean: Public — fully open ( automatically posted online on the Project Results platforms) Sensitive — limited under the conditions of the Grant Agreement EU classified — RESTREINT-UE/EU-RESTRICTED, CONFIDENTIEL-UE/EU-CONFIDENTIAL, SECRET-UE/EU-SECRET under Decision HYPERLINK "https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32015D0444&qid=1586092489803" 2015/444. For items classified under other rules (e.g. national or international organisation), please select the equivalent EU classification level. Work Package 1 Work Package 1: Project management and coordination Duration: M1 – M36 Lead Beneficiary: Leader RPNC – LATVIA, Co-leader: ProMIS - ITALY Objectives 31 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 To ensure the project implementation of high quality and completed in time, JA Coordinator will provide project management plans and tools, planning, organizing and controlling the implementation process at regular intervals, both to ensure task execution according to expected results and within budget in order to achieve JA MENTOR goals and improve the population mental health. The main objectives of the WP1 are: 1. To create and coordinate a structure that would ensure project’s smooth and goal-oriented implementation. 2. To develop consortium agreement, coordinate administrative and financial issues, communicate and report to HaDEA and DG Sante. 3. Support WP collaboration and interactions. 4. Ensure stakeholder involvement and maintain contacts. 5. Collaborate and develop synergies on clustering activities with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. A Project Handbook will be developed to summarize the project objectives, the monitoring framework and management tools, the selected approach to achieve the goals, including the implementation strategy, key controlling process, communication management plan, conflict resolution, policies, rules and project mind-sets, standardized quality criteria for developing activity, adapting it and piloting if it is in a plan. The systematic monitoring of the activities will help to check whether they are implemented according to the plan, results, deliverables and milestones are delivered on time, detect any obstacles or difficulties which may prevent the project from delivering, and to assure the overall quality of the project implementation. Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Name Description Participants In-kind No Contr. Name Role & Subcon tr T1.1 Setting up Consortium's In the first task of the MENTOR, Partners will establish, maintain and manage the organizational Latvia COO No structures structure and the relevant directing, management, performing layers and advisory bodies of the (RPNC), Consortium. Task involves setting up, coordinating and managing the relevant governing management, performing and advisory bodies which will ensure the relevance of the activities of the Consortium in All participants BEN, line with the work plan and developed strategies. AE, AP Following the PM2 methodology, Project Partners will set up the structures to ensure project's smooth, efficient and objectives-oriented implementation of the project: Consortium Forum, Executive Board, Project Core Team, Project and Financial Managers. T1.2 Ensuring smooth management The task involves developing project management plans and tools, planning, organizing and controlling Latvia COO No and goal-oriented the implementation process at regular intervals to ensure task execution according to expected results (RPNC), implementation of the project BEN, as well as within the planned budget, putting in place procedures and tools to monitor the progress of All AE, AP WPs and oversee conformity with the Consortium rules. Coordinator will organize meetings on a regular participants basis to follow-up the progress of work and mitigate risks fast at minimal level. 32 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 T1.3 Ensuring project financial Partners will prepare internal financial expenditure reports every 6 months to ensure effective controlling Latvia COO No compliance of the budget, as well as to indicate any deviations from budget plan as soon as possible. Control of the (RPNC), supporting documents for the expenditure to ensure compliance with audit regulations. Consultations BEN, and close communication with HaDEA to maintain continuous compliance within financial framework. All AE, AP participants T1.4 Contribution to evaluation of Task involves evaluation of the content of interventions to ensure the scientific aspects of the Latvia COO No the interventions implemented MENTOR in order to ensure its quality assessment, scientific integrity, robust methodology, policy (RPNC) implications and deliverable acceptance. T1.5 Coordinating collaboration with Contacts and dialogue with key stakeholders are established and maintained. Stakeholder Latvia COO, No stakeholders organizations are asked to nominate representatives to follow MENTOR and participate in the (RPNC) Consortium Forum. Develop a stakeholder matrix and level of information to be communicated. BEN, Collaborate and develop synergies on clustering activities with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs All participants AE, AP in the area of mental health. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milest Milestone Name WP Lead Description Due Date Means of one No Benefici (month Verification No ary number) MS1 Project Management 1 RPNC Established project management platform to communicate, update daily tasks, 2 Platform in use platform established monitor progress, etc. MS2 On-site kick off meeting of 1 RPNC Organizing a first on-site meeting with all Beneficiaries and Affiliate entities to kick-off 2 Meeting minutes Consortium Forum organized the project. Project handbook will be presented during this meeting, introducing all JA participants with the project management strategy, tools and structures of everyday management on a deeper level. Online synergy meeting with Clustering activities with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of MS3 Action grants on preventing 1 RPNC mental health including actions supporting vulnerable population groups, such as 3 NCDs in the area of Mental Meeting minutes migrants, refugees, Roma people and displaced people from Ukraine. health MS4 Online Feedback meeting 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 6 Meeting minutes completed approved. and recording 33 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 MS5 On-site Consortium Forum 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 12 Meeting minutes meeting completed approved, authorisation to further implement the project. Online synergy meeting with Clustering activities with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of MS6 Action grants on preventing 1 mental health including actions supporting vulnerable population groups, such as 12 NCDs in the area of Mental RPNC Meeting minutes migrants, refugees, Roma people and displaced people from Ukraine. health MS7 Online Feedback meeting 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 18 Meeting minutes completed approved. and recording MS8 On-site Consortium Forum 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 24 Meeting minutes meeting completed approved, authorisation to further implement the project. Online synergy meeting with Clustering activities with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of MS9 Action grants on preventing 1 mental health including actions supporting vulnerable population groups, such as 28 NCDs in the area of Mental RPNC Meeting minutes migrants, refugees, Roma people and displaced people from Ukraine. health MS10 Online Feedback meeting 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 30 Meeting minutes completed approved. and recording MS11 Final on-site Consortium 1 RPNC Organized meeting, established agenda and documents prepared. Key decisions 36 Meeting minutes, Forum meeting completed approved, authorisation to finish the project. approval to finish project obtained. Deliverable WP Lead Dissemination Due Description Deliverable Name Type No No Beneficiary Level Date D1.1.1 Project handbook 1 RPNC R PU 3 The Project Handbook is the basis for managing the project throughout its life cycle and is an important reference for all project members - it summarizes the project objectives and documents the selected approach for achieving the project goals. The Project Handbook documents the project’s roles and responsibilities, provides several project management plans for achieving the project goals and establishes the implementation strategy, as well 34 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 as the management and monitoring framework. Project Handbook will be updated when necessary. Document, PDF, English. D1.5.1 1 RPNC R PU 5 Overview of foreseen activities to develop synergies with the Overview of foreseen activities to Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. develop synergies with the JA English PDF. D1.5.2 1 RPNC R PU 15 Report on first period of activities to build and strengthen synergies Report on first period of activities to with the Action grants on prevention of NCDs in the area of mental build and strengthen synergies with the health. English PDF. JA D1.5.3 1 RPNC R PU 30 Final report on activities and synergies with the Action grants on Final report on synergies/sustainability prevention of NCDs in the area of mental health. English PDF. with the JA Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Work Package 2 Work Package 2: Dissemination Duration: M1 - M36 Lead Beneficiary: NFZ - POLAND Objectives The purpose of WP2 in MENTOR is to facilitate and improve effective, and sustainable external and internal communication and to ensure that its objectives, activities, results and deliverables are known to the project partners and all other stakeholders and can be transferred and/or scaled-up. The strategy is implying an equal contribution of all involved partners, under the coordination of the WP2 leader. The objective is to set up, deploy and manage all available communication channels and tools (website, social media, videos, flyers, posters and publications, etc.) to increase the visibility of the MENTOR among key stakeholders depending on clearly identified targets (e. g. ministries, the EC services and agencies, international organisations, vulnerable groups, general public). The above-mentioned channels and tools will be used also to optimize the use of resources for supporting its establishment and sustainability. WP2 main objectives are: 35 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 1. Developing and implementing a comprehensive communication and dissemination plan to raise awareness about the project, its activities and its achievements based on clearly identified and segmented target audiences. 2. Providing an internal/external web-based platform which will allow the MENTOR participants to access, upload/download key documents, keeping them up to date about the different activities of each WP and encouraging cooperation on common activities. 3. Setting-up and manage the appropriate communication tools (e.g., MENTOR website, social media accounts, flyers, posters, videos, etc.) in order to keep the project’s partners and stakeholders informed about the goals, activities and major achievements of the MENTOR. 4. Maintaining and enforcing a dialogue between the members of the JA and stakeholders – e.g.; other JAs funded by EU4Health, TEI representatives, other DGs of the EC, national ministries, international organisations, the general public, etc. 5. Disseminating project results to the key audiences in specific events and forums. Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Name Description Participants In- No kind Name Role Contr. & Subc ontr. T2.1 Brand and identity WP2 Leader will create a strong brand identity for the MENTOR. All communication tools will be based on a standardised, Poland COO unique visual identity: logo, presentation templates, graphical charter for the website and other dissemination materials. (NFZ) Ensuring and managing of use of the co-funding logos and relevant disclaimers, including acknowledgment of the EC funding support, in any of the resulting products of the JA. T2.2 Dissemination NFZ will identify and map key stakeholders and their needs – task carried in collaboration with WP1, WP4 and the Poland COO targets technical work packages. They will also conduct the stakeholder analysis which will map, identify and target the (NFZ) stakeholders that can benefit from or contribute to the MENTOR at all levels in all participating countries, e.g. involvement of Joint Action on increasing the capacity of National Focal Points (NFPs) – NFP4Health. In our work we will take into the account Stake Holder Analysis carried out by DG Sante. The task will include preparation and distribution of a survey to the MENTOR participating countries to collect quantitative and qualitative data. The survey will be used to divide stakeholders into specific groups based on background and objectives and will be used in the dissemination and communication strategy work. The task will lead to establishing the Stakeholder Board chaired by WP 2 leader and will bring added value to the MENTOR by providing assessment of the project including recommendations for activities that should be undertaken to maximize the potential of the project results. Members of the board will be chosen throughout the stakeholder analysis process. To ensure that all rules are fully followed throughout the process there is a need of involving a legal expert. Jargon-free, easy-to-understand documents and other promotional materials will be produced. Following the stakeholder analysis, specific audiences will be identified, promotional materials will be adapted, and specific communication channels will be identified as appropriate. All digital promotional materials will be WCAG compliant. 36 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Special efforts will be made to reach out to vulnerable groups, for example through patient organisations, relevant NGOs (including not only those focused on mental health, but also those focused-on youth, disability or ethnic minorities), social workers, etc. Selected materials will be made available in languages spoken by displaced persons. T2.3 Website and The aim of the task is to establish a comprehensive web of the MENTOR, which will include a project website, a YouTube Poland COO social media for Channel and social media accounts, where project literature, infographics, articles or other content will be published and (NFZ) the project promoted. The website will be designed to be accessible to all audiences. The project website will contain information on, dissemination activities, findings, resources, and a restricted area which is intended as a repository for information pertaining to project's partners. T2.4 Communication Developing and implementing of comprehensive communication and dissemination strategy will be held in cooperation Poland COO, and dissemination with Project Core Team. This strategy will describe the activities that the WP2 leader and all partners will undertake to (NFZ); strategy ensure the visibility and communication of outcomes and results of the MENTOR. Latvia BEN, The strategy will base on internal work (stakeholder analysis) and via cooperation with all WP leaders. The document will (RPNC); provide a strategy for internal and external communication, stakeholder involvement, public information, and sustainability WP BEN/ of the JA results. Leaders AE The main purpose is to inform the MENTOR partners on how they will contribute to the JA’s activities, provide them with communication guidance related to their tasks and present how all stakeholders will get involved in the dissemination All BEN/ activities at national and international level. The document will include a dissemination work strategy for stakeholders in Participa AE order to achieve the most effective dissemination and promotion of the project results. The strategy will also include the nts most efficient use of the internal and external dissemination channels and tools related to the specific target groups. The dissemination and communication strategy will be updated regularly throughout the duration of the JA. T2.5 Dissemination Organisation of various dissemination and promotional events throughout the project life cycle linked to specific project Poland COO, events and final WPs and target groups. In cooperation with members of the consortium we will develop a cycle of 4 web-based (NFZ); conference information and consultation sessions informing the public (NGOs representing vulnerable groups, patient organisations, Latvia BEN, PLEs) about the project and its deliverables (e.g. the digital tool). These sessions should be implemented in every member (RPNC); country of the consortium. Additional online information and consultation sessions (cycle of 2) should also be organised WP BEN/ for health professionals and other people dealing with the implementation of mental healthcare on project results dealing Leaders AE with the integrated care pathway in all the countries represented by the Consortium. These sessions should be in part dedicated to presenting and developing local strategies for implementing guidelines and recommendations produced by All BEN/ the project and adapting them to the local context. In addition, 2 online conferences involving policy and decision makers, Participa AE representatives of PLE and representatives of other JA dealing with mental health will be organised in order to promote nts the project and its results as well as dialogue between different stakeholders. The final conference (Consortium Forum) at European/international level will be organized by M36. All events will be organized in cooperation with the WP leaders, WP1 and WP2. Promotion of the project and the project website and the Knowledge Transfer HUB through targeted online activities including online advertising. The main aim of the task is enhancing the visibility of the MENTOR outputs to stakeholders, including external policy makers. Regular organization of promotional webinars to disseminate JA activities. The webinars will be designed to introduce conducted actions and to inform on the status of the works in the technical WPs. The recordings will be available 37 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 on the MENTOR YouTube channel and will be promoted on all social media channels. The target audiences and main messages will be defined in accordance with dissemination strategy and adapted to the needs of all WPs. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestone Milestone Name Work Lead Description Due Date Means of Verification No Package Beneficiary (month No number) MS12 Website 2 NFZ JA MENTOR website for internal and M2/M3 Launching the website external users. MS 13 Stakeholder Analysis 2 NFZ Stakeholder analysis of the MENTOR M3/M4 Stakeholder Analysis report project MS 14 Establishment of Stakeholder 2 NFZ The Stakeholder board will provide M6/7 Establishment of Stakeholder Board Board assessment and recommendations in relation to dissemination activities. MS15 Final Consortium Forum 2 NFZ Final conference of JA MENTOR M34/M36 Final Conference minutes Conference Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Type Dissemination Level Due Date Description No Package Beneficiary No D2.1.1 Stakeholder Analysis report 2 NFZ R PU M7 Stakeholder analysis report – English, PDF D2.2.1 Dissemination and 2 NFZ R PU M7 Plan with the brand identity, target definition, communication plan website and social media and the way to disseminate all activities for partners which ensure that JA will be visible on all levels – English, PDF. 38 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 D2.3.1 Final report on Dissemination 2 NFZ R PU M36 The report of all JA actions connected to and communication activities communication and dissemination – English, in JA MENTOR PDF. Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Work Package 3 Work Package 3: Evaluation Duration: M1 - M36 Lead Beneficiary: Biosistemak - SPAIN Objectives The main objectives of the WP3 are: 1. Monitor the quality and compliance of the MENTOR process and stakeholders´ views inclusion and satisfaction, ensuring the project progresses adequately according to the work plan. 2. Assess the relevance and pertinence of the outcomes according to the needs and expectations of the target groups identified. 3. Perform a structured and systematic appraisal of the impact of the JA in Europe regarding dimensions related to Sustainability, Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions (Advancing mental health in all policies, Supporting prevention / promotion actions targeted to young people, Involvement of people with lived experience (PLE) in mental health policies and Integrating care pathway for promoting social inclusion and quality of life) and Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe (Overview of effective and efficient strategies for Mental health promotion and PDTU; Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental health and Innovative, best practice solutions to assessing and monitoring the mental health status across Europe ). The specific objectives of WP3 are: 1. Design the Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) to guide the Joint Action progress study by defining the scope, methodology framework, and data collection and monitoring methods. 2. Analyse the project activities and report the results in a timely manner during the whole project. 3. Develop the assessment approach, including research methodology, indicators, measurement tools, and time-points, to facilitate the study of the MENTOR impact. 39 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Name Description Participants In-kind No Contrib Name Role utions and Subcon tracting T3.1 Project Sub-task 3.1.1 Development of the Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) Spain COO No Evaluation This task is responsible for performing a systematic appraisal of the tasks and the quality of the products of the (Biosistemak) JA. The Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) will specify the evaluation activities, including indicators (quantitative and BEN qualitative), tools for data collection, responsibilities, time for completion, and type of analysis. Latvia (RPNC) BEN Specific and well-defined actions: Poland (NHF) 1. Assessment of the achievement of every single WP task and output AE 2. Meeting deadlines and delivery dates for WPs' activities and outputs Hungary (OFKO) BEN 3. Assessment of the correct development of general and technical meetings Slovenia (NIJZ) 4. Monitoring (support, early reaction, securing data) of the calendar of MENTOR milestones BEN/ 5. Engagement of every single WP Leader (WPL) and JA liaison who contribute to the development of WP3 Italy (ISS, ASL AE by providing evaluation information on their own activities, attended events, and deliverables TO) WP Leaders (WPLs) will be responsible for compiling the information defined in the PEP, so WP3 can perform the The Netherlands corresponding analysis. The data collection instruments will include online surveys and consultations with WPLs. BEN (RIVM) Particularly, the PEP has a strong link with the activities developed in WPs 1 and 4. Therefore, WP3 will maintain close contact with these WPs to be aware and participate in the meetings organized with the Member State Policy Germany (SB) AE Committee (WPs 1 and 4) and with representatives of Member states/ Associated countries at the political level in BEN Thematic workshops and Policy dialogues (WP4). Denmark (RSD) Norway (NIPH) BEN Sub-task 3.1.2 Deployment of the Project Evaluation Plan Iceland (DOHI) BEN The quality assessment activities for the monitoring of the project quality will be performed based on the PEP. There will be an ongoing sharing of assessment results and key information to WPLs. Key stakeholders (experts Germany (BZgA) BEN on the topics addressed in the MENTOR) will be approached to identify areas of improvement and design BEN appropriate strategies to improve project performance. The final report will include lessons learnt and Hungary recommendations. The recommendations will be disseminated among the members consortia, as long as they (NNGYK) are generated according to the progress of the project. Cyprus (SHSO- BEN MHS) Estonia (MOSA) BEN Finland (THL) BEN France (FR-MOH) BEN 40 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Lithuania (SAM BEN LT) Luxembourg (DISA) AP Romania (NCMHFAD) BEN Sweden (PHAS) BEN Ukraine (PHC) BEN Spain COO T3.2 Impact Sub-task 3.2.1 Development and dissemination of Impact Assessment Plan (IAP) (Biosistemak) No Evaluation BEN The impact of the project will be measured at two levels: a) the global JA level (including impact on external Latvia (RPNC) stakeholders) and b) the implementation of results concerning Dissemination, Sustainability, Building bricks for BEN integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions Advancing mental health in all policies, Poland (NHF) Supporting prevention / promotion actions targeted to young people, Involvement of people with lived experience AE (PLE) in mental health policies and Integrating care pathway for promoting social inclusion and quality of life) and Hungary (OFKO) BEN Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe (Overview of effective and efficient Slovenia (NIJZ) strategies for Mental health promotion and PDTU; Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental BEN/ health and Innovative, best practice solutions to assessing and monitoring the mental health status across Italy (ISS, ASL AE Europe). This activity will be aligned with WP4 Sustainability. TO) The IAP will include a set of qualitative and quantitative measures (process, output and outcome, impact The Netherlands (RIVM) BEN indicators). The description, measurement instrument, and collection time-point will be determined for each indicator. WPLs will support WP3 to define indicators, which will consider the objectives, expected results, and Germany (SB) AE activities of the different WPs. WP3 will provide an online tool (REDCap) for indicators collection to enable each Denmark (RSD) BEN WPL to provide the information agreed for the IAP. A preliminary list of indicators has been outlined for each WP in collaboration with WPLs. BEN Norway (NIPH) Sub-task 3.2.2 Impact assessment of MENTOR in Europe (MS and regional governments) BEN Iceland (DOHI) The MENTOR impact evaluation will be based on the IAP, with a regular collection of all indicators defined from BEN Germany (BZgA) each WP. WPLs will be in charge of providing the corresponding information included in the IAP. The information gained will be checked, cleaned, and refined by WP3 to assure their accuracy and will be translated into Hungary BEN appropriate format for analysis. Data analysis (content for qualitative approach and statistical for quantitative (NNGYK) information) will be carried out and results will be shared with the consortium and reported in the final evaluation report (D3.2.1) Cyprus (SHSO- BEN MHS) Estonia (MOSA) BEN Finland (THL) BEN 41 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 France (FR-MOH) BEN Lithuania (SAM BEN LT) Luxembourg (DISA) AP Romania (NCMHFAD) BEN Sweden (PHAS) BEN Ukraine (PHC) BEN Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestone No Milestone Name Work Lead Beneficiary Description Due Means of Verification Package No Date MS16 Final battery of indicators defined. 3 BIOSISTEMAK The PEP and IAP indicators definition M9 Meeting minutes on will be agreed with WPLs for all WP agreement from WPL and for the overall project. MS17 On-line tool for data collection 3 BIOSISTEMAK Set up of the on-line tools for data M14 Access of WP leaders to the available. collection. web platform MS18 Inputs of the stakeholders. 3 BIOSISTEMAK Needs detected and strategies proposed by the Identification of the M24 Key stakeholders (experts in stakeholders to detect needs and JA topics) contacted and design strategies. interviewed. Deliverable Deliverable Name Work Lead Beneficiary Type Dissemination Due Description No Package No Level Date D3.1.1 Evaluation framework and Impact 3 BIOSISTEMAK R PU M12 Document, planning the assessment plan evaluation framework and the impact assessment measures - English PDF, 42 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 D3.2.1 Final evaluation report 3 BIOSISTEMAK R PU M36 The report summarizes all the evaluation activities implemented – English, PDF. Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Work Package 4 Work Package 4: Sustainability Duration: M1 - M36 Lead Beneficiary: Leader: OKFŐ - HUNGARY Co-leader: NIJZ - SLOVENIA Objectives 43 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 The main objective of the WP4 is to enable and support the uptake, uphold, reinforcement and scale-up of pilot implementations, outputs and results of the project in addressing mental health challenges in participating countries and beyond. MENTOR standardized methodological framework for sustainability activities consists of 4 tasks that cover all phases of situation analysis, the sustainability of pilot implementations, and the development of final sustainability plan with planned activities for the time after MENTOR. The application of the standardized methodological framework, adjusted to the needs of the technical work packages (WP5, WP6), will be supported by a systematic stepwise capacity building approach. Two overarching principles are applied in MENTOR pilot implementation: (1) Equity and diversity perspective, with and aim to design and implement targeted interventions specifically tailored to address the needs of disadvantaged and vulnerable population groups. This includes initiatives focusing on migrants, refugees, Roma people, people displaced from Ukraine, children, adolescents, and youth within these communities. These interventions will aim to reduce disparities in mental health outcomes and ensure equitable access to support services and resources. (2) Sustainability principle, that in all steps of design, implementation, monitoring, evaluation and reporting include essential elements, that will increase the ability of MENTOR pilots to have sustainable impact after MENTOR ends in the sense of further exploitation of the results. Elements of sustainability are policy environment, ownership of sustainability and culture of communication and consensus seeking. The specific objectives of this task are: 1. Facilitate the sustainability of pilot implementations beyond the conclusion of MENTOR. 2. To pinpoint governance opportunities for sustained interventions by training consortium members in effective communication with policymakers. 3. Contribute to EU added value of MENTOR by building on the knowledge and skills within the MENTOR consortium concerning how sustainability is achieved in varied settings and circumstances 4. Integrate active EU mental health project processes and outcomes to ensure high-level policy sustainability through identifying and promote synergistic actions. Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Name Description Participants In-kind No Contrib Name Role utions and Subcon tracting T4.1 Support of Objective: To develop sustainability supporting methodology and facilitate its implementation at pilot sites. The task will Hungary COO No sustainability be aligned with and complements the methodology developed in WP5 (T5.3) and WP6 (T6.2, T6.3). The methodology (OKFŐ) BEN of MENTOR will be based on the experiences and results from earlier JAs (JA PREVENT, JA ImpleMENTAL,) and reports published Slovenia BEN/ pilot (NIJZ) AE 44 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 implementati by OECD (Guidebook on Best Practices), the EU JRC (Science for Policy Handbook) and the sustainability criteria All ons applied for reviewing best practices for the EC Best Practices Portal. participan ts 4.1.1 Sustainability Situation Analysis The Sustainability Situation Analysis task aims to comprehensively evaluate the sustainability of mental health initiatives within the MENTOR project. It integrates insights from the Baseline Assessment and Situation Analysis, focusing on understanding current mental health statuses and initiatives through a sustainability lens. The suggested methodology: Baseline Assessment: Conduct a detailed baseline assessment to gain insights into the current status and developments of mental health initiatives from a sustainability perspective. The assessment will be based on the recent MS survey made by WHO together with the EU-commission mapping the mental health area. This work was carried out within the framework of DG SANTE's PHEG, which will be involved in facilitating an exchange of views and insights. Collaboration with WP Leaders: Engage WP leaders in collaborative efforts to create a comprehensive Baseline Assessment questionnaire. This collaboration ensures that the questionnaire encompasses specific elements relevant to each WP, aligning with project objectives and addressing unique contextual factors. Identification of Key Stakeholders: Identify key stakeholders and authorities involved in mental health initiatives within MS/AC. This step facilitates stakeholder engagement and ensures that diverse perspectives are considered during the analysis process. Gathering stakeholder input: Gather input from stakeholders to ensure that the mapping tool encompasses specific elements relevant to each WP. SWOT analysis for pilot initiatives: Apply a SWOT analysis specifically focused on factors related to the sustainability of pilot initiatives. Utilise the MENTOR Sustainability framework to cover core elements, including the policy environment, ownership of sustainability, and culture of collaboration. Identification of enablers and barriers: Define positive (enablers) and negative (potential barriers) characteristics related to the topic of the pilot at national/regional levels and at the implementation site. This analysis provides valuable insights into current strengths and weaknesses, as well as potential future challenges. Integration of Baseline Assessment and SWOT findings: Merge the findings from the baseline assessment with the SWOT analysis to provide a holistic view of sustainability needs and expectations at the national level. This integration facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the sustainability landscape, guiding the development of targeted strategies. 4.1.2 Evaluating pilots towards sustainability based on the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP) The Sustainability Situation Analysis task aims at evaluating the sustainability of mental health initiatives through a comprehensive and systematic approach. The suggested methodology: Integration of sustainability actions in pilot implementation plans: Following the methodology outlined in WP5 and WP6, each pilot site is requested to incorporate at least one concrete action supporting sustainability into their Pilot Implementation Plan. These actions are designed to promote long-term viability and impact beyond the duration of the pilot initiatives. Compilation of potential sustainability measures: The inclusion of sustainability actions in the Pilot Implementation Plans results in a comprehensive list of potential sustainability measures across all pilot sites. Utilisation of measurement instruments from the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP): The evaluation of sustainability measures is 45 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 conducted using measurement instruments defined in the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP) (T3.2). Data collection and analysis: Data related to the implementation and outcomes of sustainability measures are collected systematically from each pilot site. This includes qualitative and quantitative data to provide a comprehensive understanding of the sustainability efforts and their impact. Evaluation criteria: Evaluation criteria outlined in the IAP are utilized to assess the success and effectiveness of sustainability measures. These criteria may include factors such as scalability, replicability, stakeholder engagement, policy alignment, and long-term impact. Cross-site comparison: Comparative analysis is conducted to identify common themes, challenges, and best practices across pilot sites. This comparative approach allows for the identification of overarching trends and insights regarding sustainability efforts within the mental health domain. 4.1.3 Sustainability Action Plan Building upon the results gleaned from the evaluation of pilots towards sustainability, as guided by the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP), this task focuses on the development of tailored action plans for each pilot site. The suggested methodology: Utilization of evaluation findings: The results obtained from the evaluation of pilots towards sustainability, in accordance with the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP), serve as the foundation for the development of Sustainability Action Plans. Integration of methodologies from previous tasks: The methodology described in previous tasks, particularly Task 4.1.2, is leveraged to guide the preparation of Sustainability Action Plans. Tailored strategies for sustainability: Each Sustainability Action Plan is customized to the specific needs and circumstances of the respective pilot site. Addressing contextual factors: Sustainability Action Plans are designed to address a diverse array of contextual factors that influence the potential impact of pilot initiatives on the targeted population. These factors may include health and social policies, levels of innovation, diversity and inclusiveness (e.g., gender, cultural aspects), economic dynamics, and epidemiological developments. Incorporation of stakeholder input, thematic workshop and policy dialogue results: Stakeholder input is solicited and integrated into the development of Sustainability Action Plans, ensuring alignment with the priorities and perspectives of key stakeholders involved in the pilot initiatives, as well as the results of the thematic workshop and policy dialogue. 4.1.4 Final Sustainability Report Based on the tailored Sustainability Action Plans for each pilot site a Final Sustainability Report will be elaborate covering a time period of 2 years after the end of MENTOR, that serves as a guiding document to support the scaling up of pilot results and the integration of knowledge generated from the Joint Action into policy and sustainability efforts post-project. This task also entails synthesizing insights, recommendations, and strategic plans from various WPs. It encompasses the following key elements: Core elements for sustainability: 46 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 - Assessment of the context/situation surrounding sustainability efforts. - Identification of pilots and practices to be replicated and sustained. - Support needed from stakeholders and communities, along with strategies for ensuring this support. Strategic financial planning and action plan: - Detailed description of strategic financial planning. - Development of action plans outlining activities for the next 2 years after the end of MENTOR to ensure sustainability. Assessment of long-term stability and flexibility: - Evaluation of the long-term stability and flexibility of sustainability holders. - Assessment of strategic partnerships and their role in sustaining project initiatives. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: - Guidance on selecting SMART indicators to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of sustained practices. T4.2 Bridging the Objective: To improve the consortium members and public health experts competencies in enhancing the translation of Hungary COO Research- the findings from the pilots into sustainable changes in policies and other actions at local, regional and national level. (OKFŐ) Policy Divide Slovenia through Skill BEN (NIJZ) Development 4.2.1 Pre-post assessment of the training All Pre-assessment: Prior to the onset of the training program, baseline data will be gathered to ascertain the prevailing participa BEN competencies and perceptions of MENTOR partners concerning research-to-policy interaction and communication skills. nts Post-assessment: Following the training, a subsequent assessment will be conducted to discern any discernible shifts /AE or enhancements in participants' competencies and perceptions. Employing a blend of quantitative and qualitative methodologies encompassing surveys, interviews, and focus groups, the assessment endeavors to procure comprehensive feedback from participants. 4.2.2 Training the MENTOR consortium members for strenghtening public health experts/researchers capacity for policy engagement Through an interactive online course, the training aims to cultivate proficiency in four key skill areas: Skill 1: Engagement with Policy-Makers and Stakeholders: - Enhance the ability to effectively engage with policymakers and stakeholders, fostering meaningful dialogue and collaboration. 47 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 - Facilitate the exchange of knowledge and insights to ensure project findings are informed by real-world needs and priorities. - Skill 2: Communication Skills: - Develop clear, strategic, and accessible communication skills to convey project findings in a manner that resonates with policymakers. - Overcome barriers posed by academic jargon, ensuring that policymakers have access to relevant and understandable information to inform evidence-informed decisions. - Skill 3: Interpersonal Skills: - Cultivate proficiency in social interaction, including the ability to send and receive verbal and non-verbal cues, essential for successful engagement with stakeholders and policymakers. - Foster effective collaboration and relationship-building to facilitate knowledge exchange and consensus-building. - Skill 4: Advising Policymakers: - Equip participants with the skills necessary to provide evidence-informed policy advice, drawing from their expertise while remaining objective and impartial. - Enable public health experts to identify policy options, assess their likely impact, and provide informed recommendations from an expert viewpoint. - Enhanced communication skills will foster ongoing dialogue between researchers and policymakers. This will support the development of impactful policy recommendations aligned with national needs, maximizing the project's influence and ensuring its findings continue to shape mental health policy. Online courses lasting 2 days will be provided, during which trainers will train a maximum of 50 persons involved in pilot and project implementations. T4.3 Strategic Objective: To strategically engage with stakeholders at both national and international levels, fostering empowerment Hungary COO No stakeholder and advocacy to enhance the sustainability of mental health initiatives within the project. (OKFŐ) engagement This task focuses on strategically engaging stakeholders and advocating for sustainability through thematic workshops Slovenia and BEN and policy dialogues. The suggested methodology. (NIJZ) advocacy through Facilitate stakeholder understanding and empowerment: Engage relevant stakeholders to ensure a comprehensive All thematic understanding of proposed changes and prepare them for implementation. Empower stakeholders by providing them participa BEN/ workshops with the necessary knowledge and tools to actively participate in mental health system development initiatives. Develop nts AE and policy stakeholder networks: Facilitate the development of a network focused on mental health system development, dialogues to fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange among stakeholders. Strengthen relationships between stakeholders enhance to promote sustainability and ongoing support for mental health initiatives. Stakeholders invited to participate will sustainability represent a diverse range of perspectives, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, researchers, community leaders, advocacy groups, and individuals with lived experience. They will be selected based on their expertise, influence, and relevance to the workshop's thematic focus. Involvement will be sought from stakeholders across different countries to ensure a comprehensive and inclusive representation of perspectives and experiences. Preparation and execution of workshops: Conduct preparatory work to design workshops and formulate strategies for their execution. Commence the delivery of workshops involving MSs and ACs once valuable lessons learned from the implementation 48 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 of WP5 and WP6 have been identified. Workshop topics will align with key thematic areas identified in WP5 and WP6, such as mental health promotion strategies, stigma reduction, access to services, and digital health solutions. Post- workshop actions: Following the workshops, a summary report will be produced to document key insights, outcomes, and action points arising from the discussions. Action plans will be developed to translate workshop findings into tangible initiatives and activities. Stakeholders will be encouraged to continue collaborating and sharing resources beyond the workshops, forming partnerships and networks to advance shared goals. Follow-up activities may include working groups, task forces, research projects, advocacy campaigns, or policy development initiatives based on workshop outcomes. T4.4 Collaboration Objective: To foster effective collaboration among JA MENTOR, JA impleMENTAL and JA preventNCD, leveraging their Hungary COO No between joint collective efforts for a more significant impact and high-level policy sustainability. By leveraging potential synergies, such (OKFŐ) actions as aligning messaging to policymakers, sharing tools and resources developed within each JA, and co-hosting events, Slovenia related to this task aims to maximize the impact and reach of mental health policies across the EU. BEN (NIJZ) mental health Establishment of a sustainability coordination body: Involves the establishment of a sustainability coordination body to foster high- All comprising coordinators and WP4 leaders from all participating joint actions. This coordination body will organise annual level policy participa BEN/ online meetings to monitor progress, identify synergies, and exchange best practices related to sustainability efforts sustainability nts AE within the various JAs. All participants will have opportunities to contribute to the discussion across JA projects, ensuring diverse perspectives and collaborative solutions. This collaboration can ensure the widespread adoption of the mental health approach across the EU. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestone Milestone Name WP Lead Description Due Date Means of No No Beneficia Verification ry MS19 Methodology for Sustainability 4 Hungary In close collaboration with all WP leaders methodology, guidance M6 Document Situation Analysis and key OKFŐ materials and templates for Sustainability Situation Analysis and stakeholders’ identification stakeholder identification will be developed to implementing partners MS20 Methodology for Sustainability 4 Hungary Methodology and templates for sustainability action plan will be M12 Document Action Plan OKFŐ developed to implementing partners MS21 4 Slovenia Training of MENTOR consortium members will be delivered to M22-M30 Number of trained Training delivery NIJZ strengthen public health experts/researchers capacity for policy partners: 49 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 engagement. The timing of the training will be accommodated to the maximum 50 pilot implementation phases. persons MS22 Training report 4 Slovenia Training reports will be prepared to provide a succinct summary of M33 Document NIJZ participant rate, training progress, participant feedback, and estimated impact. These reports will also serve to track and evaluate the effectiveness of the training initiatives. Deliverab Deliverable WP Lead Type Dissemination Due Description le No Name No Beneficiary Level Date D4.1.1 Final 4 Hungary R PU M34 Building upon the results gained from the evaluation of pilots towards sustainability, Sustainability OKFŐ tailored sustainability action plans for each pilot site, a comprehensive sustainability Report report will be delivered, ensuring alignment and strategy integration for continued project impact. English, PDF. Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Work Package 5 Work Package 5: Building bricks for integrated and comprehensive Mental Health and Wellbeing Actions Duration: M1 – M36 Lead Beneficiary: ISS - ITALY Objectives WP5 aims at contributing to furthering actions to address mental health in a more comprehensive way that spans across different policy domains. The building of a new comprehensive, prevention and promotion-oriented multilateral approach to mental health. WP5 activities are designed to meet the overall MENTOR goal of promoting mental health 50 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 by sharing experiences from policy to clinical and from individual to population levels. WP5 addresses the needs of people with defined mental disorders but also intends to promote the mental health of European region population, recognizing the intrinsic value of positive mental health. In this framework, Project Partners will work on new approaches and actions throughout the EU, in line with the Healthier Together EU NCD initiative, which aims to promote mental health and prevent and address at the population-level mental health problems and mental disorders, and to set up ways to support people living with mental disorders. WP5 capitalizes on this initiative and focuses on: − building capacity to better understand and develop an approach that integrates mental health in and for policies in different domains. − promoting mental health interventions in communities focusing on vulnerable groups (e.g., youth, migrants, refugees, ROMA people and persons displaced from Ukraine) and fighting stigma, − aligning with existing initiatives focused on capacity building at policy level in the EU (e.g. the work by the WHO Regional Office for Europe as funded via the EU4Health programme as a flagship initiative on mental health) − improve equal access to mental health care for people with mental health disorders highlighting the importance of People with lived experience (PLE) inclusion in mental health care service design, − enhancing social inclusion, tackling stigma and discrimination associated with mental health issues. Therefore, the specific objective of WP5 is to promote the creation of an ecosystem in which MS can work closely on different policies in mental health issues, mental health promotion and prevention interventions and best practices, promoting an integrated policy approach to mental health, as well as person-centered care pathways in mental health services and policies, also with the support of PLE. To do this, Partners structures WP5 into 4 tasks, representing the 4 bricks through which the partnership intends to establish and develop a common ground for the development of the global approach, described below. Firstly, the state of play with regards to the implementation of a Mental Health in All Policies (MHIAP) approach will be mapped, and a flexible methodology/process will be developed subsequently to support Member States. This is the starting point to showcase how mental health can be embedded in and for different policies to recognize the important contribution of other policies to mental health, capitalize on these and ensure flexible, well-informed policy and actions that consider contexts, available resources, and genuinely achievable results. The second task, another significant building brick, focuses on the topic of promotion/prevention, emphasizing its implementation in different community settings (school, workplaces, leisure time, etc.) with the contribution of other policies for the co-programming. Partners have specifically chosen to dedicate this task to vulnerable groups of population and in particular young people among those groups, in order to be more effective in terms of results, given the focus on personalized approach. The third brick focuses on the inclusion of PLE in the development and implementation of mental health policies, another crucial element in building the strategy. In this context, special attention is given to human resources (including PLE) as a key factor in policy development and implementation of mental health policies. The fourth and final task, which will integrate with the previous activities, aims to analyze the different policies and services, organization for Mental health in the Member States and to promote the definition and implementation of an integrated care pathway (policies, funds, services, human resources, etc.) targeted on the person’s needs and preferences and aimed at his/her recovery and inclusion in the community. The specific outcomes of the WP5 are: − Developed/encouraged collaboration among different policies in mental health issues. − Supported national and regional policy-makers in the design, implementation and innovation of mental health in all policy (MHIAP) approaches by developing and piloting a flexible methodology to support implementation of MHIAP; − Identified evidence-based and innovative best practices for the promotion and prevention interventions targeted to vulnerable groups and tackling stigma and discrimination associated with mental health problems and addiction by sharing good practices, methods − Empowered people with lived experience (PLE) and their inclusion in mental health policy and services. 51 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 − Provided care pathways to promote proactive and person-centered care for people with mental health disorders through the Personal Budget methodology. Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Name Description Participants In- No kind Name Role Contr. & Subco nt T5.1. Advancing mental As requested by DG SANTE, MENTOR is to deliver on the ‘development, piloting and possible The Netherlands COO No health in all policies: implementation of a methodology to ensure that mental health is integrated in relevant policies. The (RIVM, Trimbos); AE methods to evaluate purpose of this task, therefore, is to support policy makers at national and regional government levels in Sweden (PHAS) BEN and deliver at national the design, implementation, and improvement of mental health in all policies approaches. Such policy Denmark (RSD), BEN and regional levels makers can include civil servants within the health sector (i.e. responsible for health policy development France (FR-MOH), BEN or implementation at a Ministry of Health or municipal health directorate), but can also extend to their Finland (THL), BEN counterparts working in other policy sectors such as social affairs or education. More specifically, the Germany (BZgA), BEN current knowledge and experiences as regards Mental Health in All Policies (MHIAP) methodology will Iceland (DOHI), BEN be mapped and a flexible methodology will be developed to guide the implementation of MHIAP Italy (ISS, ASL of BEN approaches. This methodology is designed to support policy makers (at national and regional/local Turin, AE levels) to see the value of a MHIAP approach in their context and have the best available information Latvia (RPNC), BEN and tools at hand to implement a MHIAP approach to take a comprehensive approach to addressing Estonia (MOSA) BEN mental health (and its determinants) across domains within and beyond the health sector. The Slovenia (NIJZ), BEN methodology will contain answers to questions such as include ‘how does integrated policy making Lithuania (SAM BEN actually work’, ‘how can it be organized’, ‘how can it be sustained and developed further’? As of yet, the LT), existing body of knowledge as regards MHIAP (and its implementation) is not as well-developed as its Cyprus (SHSO- BEN ‘general’ counterpart (HIAP); a well-developed MHIAP approach is needed, that also takes into account MHS), specificities related to (public) mental health policymaking. This task thus aims to deliver on MHIAP Romania BEN methodology and implementation guidance that builds on practical and theoretical insights, also as (NCMHFAD), regards mental health equity and sensitivity to the needs of vulnerable groups, and supports the Ukraine (PHC) BEN implementation of best available interventions (across policy levels) The task also aims to maximise Spain opportunities for cross-national learning, incorporating the specific needs of participating countries into (BIOSISTEMAK, BEN account through piloting the implementation (as developed in the initial phase) in four select Member ICO, AE States. This will also be done through setting up a learning lab for partner countries piloting the IDIVAL, AE methodology, to come together several times a year to share experiences in implementing the FUNDESALUD, AE methodology, also with task partners that do not implement, The learning lab will also be instrumental in GENCAT, SMS, AE refining the methodology guidance further and improving its utility. FFIS, SAS) AE The task will build on learnings presented in the Commission's 'Healthier Together’ guidance document, AE the 2023 Joint Statement for Mental Health in All Policies developed via the Health Policy Platform, and AE 52 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 on the 2017 recommendations for action on Mental Health in All Policies developed following the 2013- 2016 Joint Action on Mental Health and Well-being. Furthermore, synergies will be explored with new work, such as early outcomes of MENTOR work on health promotion, the WHO Capacity Building Initiative (flagship 1 of the EU Communication) that will also address mental health across policies, and efforts as regards mental health promotion (notably on mapping) that is proposed within the context of the Joint Action PREVENT, Several partners that will work on this specific PREVENT task will also contribute to task 5.1. As such, the task will deliver on one of four key areas of action proposed in ‘Healthier Together’: supporting favourable conditions for mental health and increasing resilience, implementing Mental Health in All Policies, also the area that Member States’ health ministries identified as most relevant to them. This task concludes with a final methodology ready for Member States to use either nationally or regionally, and a final ‘policy and practice’ event to showcase experiences of Member States in piloting the methodology. The task will be delivered in three steps: Task 5.1.1: Mapping review resulting in draft MHIAP guidance Mapping review of existing knowledge of and experience with MHIAP methodology, how countries and regions participating in this task have developed their MHIA policy cycle, and what lessons can be learned from this. The review will culminate in a (draft) set of recommendations and guidance to support countries and/or regions in the use of MHIAP methodologies. Task 5.1.2: Piloting of draft guidance at local/regional and national level, supported by cross- national learning lab. Four countries will try out the draft guidance (as delivered via subtask 5.1.1) within the scope of their specific national/regional context. They will be at the heart of a multi-country ‘learning lab’, regularly sharing experience with their pilot efforts not just amongst themselves but also with the wider group of task partners. Task 5.1.3: Policy and practice dialogue and final drafting of MHIAP guidance Through this subtask, lessons learned from subtask 5.1.2 will be shared and brought together with relevant outcomes of EU-supported initiatives that run (partly) parallel to MENTOR, such as the JA- PREVENT and Commission Flagship capacity building initiatives. This will happen at a dedicated dialogue event. All shared learnings will then inform a final redraft of MHIAP methodology guidance. T5.2 Supporting prevention / The Task will consist in valorizing current good practices and promoting their integration into the Hungary (OKFŐ, COO No promotion actions implementation of new mental health strategies that leverage innovative approaches developed within NNGYK, BEN targeted to young community settings. This will focus specifically on interventions aimed at fostering prevention, reducing BCH) AE 53 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 people in community stigma and promoting social inclusion, with a strong emphasis on vulnerable populations, especially Italy (ISS, BEN setting among the youth (young people). ProMIS, ASL Of AE Turin), AE This task foresees the following subtasks: Germany (BzgA; BEN 5.2.1 Mapping Evidence-Based Guidelines: ULEI) AE - Systematically map existing evidence-based guidelines for prevention and promotion France (FR-MOH), BEN interventions tailored to young people with a strong emphasis on vulnerable populations. Denmark (RSD) BEN Luxembourg AP 5.2.2 Identifying Community Program Inventory: (DISA), - Identifying selective community programs, taking into account best practices published on ES Iceland (DOHI), BEN Best Practice Portal, for mental health promotion and prevention, strategically designed for Latvia (RPNC), BEN various settings, including municipalities, schools, kindergartens, social services, workplaces, Lithuania (SAM BEN local communities, etc. These programs are designed for different target groups (teachers, LT) social workers, childcare workers, health visitors, parents, caregivers), including women in the Estonia (MOSA), BEN perinatal phase (pregnancy to the end of the first year postpartum), to promote mental health Romania BEN in women and their newborns as early as possible. The aim is to enhance access to evidence- (NCMHFAD), based, innovative, promising, and personalized approaches and interventions for managing Norway (NIPH), BEN mental health problems. Poland (NHF) BEN Identifying equity-focused actions such as: Ukraine (PHC), BEN targeted measures to support particularly vulnerable groups such as migrants, refugees, Slovenia (NIJZ), BEN Roma, and displaced persons from Ukraine. Cyprus (SHSO- BEN • targeted actions to reduce health inequalities, especially among socio-economically MHS), disadvantaged populations. Spain • targeted actions to address mental health challenges exacerbated by the pandemic, (BIOSISTEMAK, BEN with a particular focus on vulnerable groups such as disadvantaged and Roma youth, IDIVAL, AE children of parents with lower education or income. FUNDESALUD, AE • targeted actions for patients with mental illness to improve their health processes, FRCB- AE avoid complications, enhance their daily functioning, and elevate their quality of life; IDIBAPS/HCB, AE this strategy also endeavors to counter stigma and foster social inclusion, particularly GENCAT, SAS, AE, among vulnerable groups (i.e. physical exercise as a non-pharmacological health FFIS, SMS) AE therapy) AE Implementing community-based mental health promotion programs tailored to individuals with mental illness, including evidence-based interventions like physical exercise as a non-pharmacological therapy, drawing from recognized European best practices such as Activa’t (Get Active!). Specifically, for implementation of the Activa’t Best practice the following actions will be performed: Identification and collaboration: Identify primary care centers, mental health centers, and Mental Health Hospitals to establish a collaboration network with municipalities providing sports spaces. Coordinate 54 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 with local authorities to secure venues for conducting the 6-month physical exercise program, consisting of sessions held three days a week, each lasting one hour. Participant recruitment and program integration: Mental health patients from primary care centers and mental health centers will integrate into existing ACTIVA groups alongside individuals with other pathologies. Patients of short and medium stay from mental health hospitals will receive physical exercise prescriptions from their doctors, with requests forwarded to the ACTIVA program management institution. Specialized groups will be formed for these patients, led by trained sports physical educators. Ensure patients leave the hospital premises for program sessions, conducted in sports spaces provided by the city council, if necessary, and accompanied by nursing assistants if required. Program implementation: Engage a subcontracted company to provide qualified physical exercise graduates who will execute the program designed by experts (ACTIVA Program) and conduct specific training sessions. Evaluation and Monitoring: Conduct initial and final evaluations for all participants, monitoring their progress throughout the program. Assess patients' clinical data, ensuring compliance with data protection laws. Utilize tests such as quality of life questionnaires, physical condition assessments (aerobic, strength, balance, and flexibility), satisfaction surveys, and evaluations of lifestyle factors including toxic habits, nutrition, and sleep patterns. Deliverable: An assessment report detailing the effectiveness and outcomes of the implemented intervention, including improvements in health processes, reduction of complications, and enhancements in quality of life for participants. Target Participants: Recruitment of 75 subjects from primary care centers and mental health centers participating in regional ACTIVA programs, along with 50 subjects from Mental Health Hospitals joining specialized ACTIVA groups. 5.2.3 Developing advocacy communication materials and setting a digital advocacy strategy - This subtask engages the public, relevant stakeholders, and multipliers to increase public awareness in drawing media attention to substance use disorders and framing the public’s view of it. Project partners will design a digital media advocacy strategy that includes PLE and the destigmatization of young people with problematic substance use. In synergy with D5.2.2 and D5.3.3, Project Partners will use the potential power of media as an instrument for preventing and combating all forms of stigmatization and for gaining support for public and societal policies to promote healthier environments, also adapting good practices such as FairMediaSUCHT. 5.2.4 Design of training and supervision initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings 55 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 - Project partners will collaborate to create a training program specifically designed for professionals and educators from various environments. The objective is to equip these trainers with strategies and insights for addressing the mental health vulnerabilities of young individuals, leveraging communication tools that have been previously established. This effort aims to enhance the mental resilience of young people during crisis situations, mitigating the detrimental effects on their mental well-being. By drawing on experiences from the COVID-19 pandemic and other crises, the initiative will explore preventative measures and mitigation strategies that can be applied to the general populace and particularly vulnerable groups. Additionally, the development of guidelines for distribution across member states will be a key focus, aimed at enhancing the capacity to manage stress and anxiety. The general aim of Task 5.2 is to compile a report containing all the programs that can be considered good practices (hence already implemented, as well as present in the EC Best Practices Portal), useful to set national community programs for youth. This task will also explore potential synergies with other health related initiatives capitalizing other initiatives such as the EU4Health Joint Action (ImpleMENTAL, PREVENT), Horizon Europe Program (e.g. IMPROVA, Schools4Health), the Erasmus+ Program (projects HOORAY, SPHERE and EASMH), the 2023 Flagship TSI Youth First, as well as other international initiatives (i.e., Australia) which aim to support the wellbeing, education, training, social protection, and labor prospects of children and youth. Task 5.2 will be complemented by WP 6, which evaluates but primarily also implements digital tools for mental health in multiple European languages. The tasks in 5.2 and 6 will coordinate their evaluation criteria, such that instruments with a particular aim are judged with the same criteria independent of the presentation media and present the results of such work jointly. T5.3 Involvement and joint This task aims to involve individuals, including adolescents and young adults, with lived experiences of Germany (SB); COO ownership of people mental health issues. There is a lot of evidence available which shows the improvement of MH services Italy (ASL Turin), COO with lived experience after a meaningful involvement of PLE in mental health services, as well as in community settings and Cyprus (SHSO- BEN (PLE) in mental health in decision making process, in agreement with numerous international agencies’ (WHO, EC) MHS); policies recommendations. The core aspect is, that people with lived experience are relevant support in Estonia (MOSA), BEN evaluating which methods, approaches, structures, conditions support their recovery, and which do not. Finland (THL) BEN This is crucial knowledge for the improvement of MH services. This task is fully oriented to put in place Iceland (NUHI), AE concrete actions, to implement pilot activities at local level and to test and study the effectiveness of Denmark(RSD), BEN implemented actions. Each country will start from a different point. Some countries may have already a Latvia (RPNC), BEN culture of involvement, participation or co-production, other countries may not even have a self-help Germany (BZgA, BEN movement. In the preparatory phase of the proposal, some countries have already indicated the intention MHB) AP to participate as observer in one or more actions, others have expressed their commitment to fully Slovenia (NJIZ), BEN implementing one or more actions. As for an example for activity there will be developed the best Hungary (NNGYK), BEN practise example which include PLE in service design as well as developing the training manual for PLE Italy (ISS, ProMIS), BEN, to ensure the peer support for people with experience of suicidal ideation or behaviour. Suicide AE 56 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 prevention and peer support for PLE is one of the priorities in many national mental health strategies Lithuania (SAM BEN and this practical initiative can be used and implemented in MS in very simple manner with expected LT), high feasibility. Romania BEN The subtasks of T5.3 are: (NCMHFAD), Spain 5.3.1 Valorising current good practices of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings (BIOSISTEMAK, BEN - Current good practices and valuable experiences regarding PLE involvement in different countries will IDIVAL, AE be collected, in order to develop strategies and recommendation for the involvement of PLE in mental ICO, AE health service and in community settings FUNDESALUD, AE FRCB- AE 5.3.2 Development of models of training and peer support tools and development of evaluation tools IDIBAPS/HCB, AE - Partners will be invited to describe different fields and spheres where involvement, participation or co- SAS, SMS, FFIS) AE production of PLE take place. This will allow the different countries to choose which approach suits the Ukraine (PHC) AE best. Conditions for successful involvement and participation of PLE will be described, including actions BEN to prepare or train PLE to be most effective and enable PLE to get influence and active role in service designing and starting an activity in practise. 5.3.3 Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy at National level - Partners will work on the collaboration among PLE, professionals and other actors of multidisciplinary teams. Partners will define processes, procedures and protocols for efficient co-working. PLE voice will help Partners in defining national and European policies on mental health across different sectors Including PLE perspectives and insights is crucial to ensure that these initiatives can be flexible, responsive, and cater to their specific needs throughout their entire lifespan. This inclusive approach will enhance the overall effectiveness of these interventions, resulting hopefully in better outcomes for individuals and the broader community. This Task will also capitalize the experience of the TSI Youth First, which lead to the development and experimentation of methodologies for consultations with young people in the health and social fields, as well as the preparation of policy recommendations for a meaningful future engagement of young people in social and health issues through youth networks. T5.4 Integrated care Personalization is a key element of healthcare policy, as underlined by the World Health Organization Italy (ISS, ProMIS, COO pathway for promoting (WHO). It is built on the conception of a health care system centered on human principles and rights, Lombardy Region, AE, social inclusion and such as equity, participation, self-determination, and non-discrimination. This means treating patients ASL of Turin, AE, quality of life of people from a person-centered perspective, listening to their needs, and recognizing their abilities and freedom UNIMIBI) AE with Mental Health to choose for their own health. A person-centered approach will enable different sectors to work together, disorders using available resources and different competencies, to meet person's needs. Germany (BZgA), BEN The task 5.4 will help participating partners in defining and implementing integrated care pathways for people with mental disorders within their countries and produce recommendations to promote health Denmark (RSD) BEN and social integration. Public policies, different funding sources, health, educational and social services, Cyprus (SHSO- BEN various professional resources, etc. will collaborate in close integration and partnership. Objective of this MHS) synergic intervention is the recovery and full inclusion in the community of people with mental health 57 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 disorders. Through the innovative methodology of the personal health budget, health and social services Estonia (MOSA) BEN work together to provide integrated interventions in the following four areas: health, housing, job placement, affectivity/sociality/life and relational skills. Each person is accompanied through a tailored Poland (NHF) BEN individual project, designed according to his/her specific needs and preferences and using available public/personal/private resources. The individual’s personal empowerment is ensured by his/her full Romania BEN involvement and consent at every stage of the negotiation and decision-making process. (NCMHFAD), AE The availability or absence of economical/material (i.e. house, income, pension, salary, annuity…) and Iceland (PHCI) informal (diplomas, supporting family, social network, personal skills….) resources is considered in BEN Spain defining the person’s needs and personal health budget. The latter is defined as the set of resources (BIOSISTEMAK, AE available from the individual and his/her context and the list of resources/interventions that integrated IDIVAL, ICO, services ensure or provide during the personalised project. The project is monitored and evaluated FUNDESALUD, AE periodically and updated accordingly. FRCB- AE During the task, data and information concerning public policy and mental health services' organization IDIBAPS/HCB, will be collected from participating countries and analysed. People with lived experiences will be actively GENCAT, SAS, AE included in the multidisciplinary team evaluating data collected and defining the key components of the FFIS, SMS), AE integrated health-social care pathway that will be implemented in some MS. AE The personal health budget has been tested so far in different countries, including the United Kingdom, AE Belgium, Denmark, Italy, Finland, Austria, France, Sweden, Germany, Australia, and the United States, AE with different types of programs, varying from inclusion criteria related to commissioned services or the person’s degree of choice. The main goal of most programs was to promote autonomy and independent Ukraine (PHC) BEN living, whereas other programs focused more on improving the caregiver’s system of care. The subtasks of 5.4 are: 5.4.1 Survey dissemination and analysis - A Panel consisting of members from ministries, public agencies, professionals in mental health and social work, municipalities, and PLE will conduct an analysis of the needs, services, and policies relevant to the local population. This process involves: a) establishing the panel with representatives from both public and private sectors; b) developing and distributing a survey to gather: 1) the needs and challenges identified by the individuals with mental health disorders (MHDs) in each country; 2) details on social and healthcare services available for MHDs ; 3) information regarding national policies on social and health care for people with MHDs; c) analysing the responses from the survey and creating a Knowledge Exchange Report that includes the findings from the participating countries. 5.4.2 Definition of the integrated care pathway - Based on data gathered by D.5.4.1, the essential elements of the integrated care pathway in mental health (MH) will be detailed involving: 1. members of the multidisciplinary equipe for the initial assessment; 2. testing tools and questionnaires to evaluate clinical and personal outcomes; 3. standardized format for the planning and monitoring of the integrated social-health interventions.The document defined will be posted on the Joint Action (JA) website to invite for feedback and suggestions 58 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 from stakeholders such as MH clinical centers, people with lived experience (PLE), NGOs, municipalities, etc. All feedback will be reviewed by the Panel for potential modifications, leading to the finalization of the document. The finalized document will be translated into all the different European languages for broader accessibility and understanding. 5.4.3 Pilot implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway - Pilot foresees the implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway among EU Member States. It will include conducting impact evaluations to assess the effectiveness and outcomes of the interventions. This process entails developing guidelines for the deployment of the integrated care pathway within social and health services across EU Member States, training professionals, and applying and tracking the pathway among a selection of individuals with MHDs. The evaluation of the care pathway will use an online tool for self-assessment of integrated care, along with standardized outcome measures and quality of life assessments, to objectively measure enhancements in mental health and overall well-being. The initiative will also involve analysing data, collecting feedback, and implementing necessary improvements to elevate the quality of care. 5.4.4 Definition and dissemination of community-based mental health policies - Partners will pinpoint, gather, and disseminate exemplary and hopeful strategies concerning a thorough community-oriented approach to mental health (MH). They aim to champion policies that emphasize community-based MH care across EU Member States. The Panel will develop unique, customized sets of recommendations and strategies for their deployment across three different target groups: 1. For Social and Health Ministers, the Panel will offer precise policy advice based on evidence-driven practices to guide ministers in charge of healthcare and associated fields. These suggestions seek to foster systemic enhancements in the provision of mental health care; 2. For Professionals involved in mental health care and related services, providing them with practical guidelines and strategies to improve care delivery within their professional scope; 3. For the General Public, creating awareness and understanding about mental health, promoting community-based care approaches, and encouraging public engagement and support for mental health initiatives. The task 5.4 will work in close collaboration with task 5.3 to support the implementation of this integrated approach, through the active involvement of different sectors of the Public Health, Social and Educational System. Project partners will transfer the experience and the knowledge gained to other Member States, through these 4 main outcomes: • Knowledge exchange report (D.5.4.1); • Definition of the ICP (D.5.4.2) focusing on vulnerable people; • Guidelines and the training material (D.5.4.3) focused on Mental health professionals; • Policy recommendations (D.5.4.4) for National policymakers. 59 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestone No Milestone Name Work Lead Description Due Date Means of Package Beneficiary Verification No (month number) MS23 Mapping review on MHIAP 5 Netherlands Analysis of academic and grey literature, policy documents, reports, M10 Report and case studies from various countries and organizations that have implemented MHIAP approaches. MS24 Start pilots and learning network 5 Sweden Piloting MHIAP guidance at local/regional and national level, setting M15 Meetings of up a 'learning lab’ with additional task partner countries as the network observers. of MSs Methodology for implementation 5 Netherlands Guidance/blueprint document based on outcomes and learnings of M36 Report MS25 of MHIAP for Member States all three subtasks, including a final policy and practice dialogue finalized event. Mapping of interventions/actions 5 Hungary Knowledge of EU ongoing actions/interventions targeting mental M18 Report MS26 in MS OKFŐ health and well-being of vulnerable groups, infants/children/adolescents/young people in community settings MS27 Completion of the Actions 5 Hungary Selection of evidence-based community programs based on target M30 Report guidelines OKFŐ groups MS28 Digital advocacy strategy on 5 Germany Evidence-based map on digital advocacy on reducing stigmatization M12 Meeting with stigma designed of problematic substance use in vulnerable groups (i.e., young professional ULEI people); exchange of experiences among professionals regarding s and successful implementation processes. stakeholders MS29 Completion of 5 Italy Design of a training path targeted to professionals/educators of M21 Report interviews/questionnaires in MSs different settings on training programs ISS MS30 Engagement recommendations 5 Germany Definition of National and European Policy Recommendations for M34 Report SB; Italy Mental Health Engagement. ASL Turin 60 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Knowledge collection on 5 Italy ISS Definition of integrated care pathways in mental health to proceed M12 Report MS31 integrated care pathways in EU with implementation and monitoring among EU MSs MSs MS32 Developing an European/National 5 Italy ISS Preparation of Documents for Ministries, professionals and general M33 Report Health Strategy for Integrated population Mental Health Care Delivera Deliverable Name WP Lead Type Dissem Due Description ble No No Beneficiary ination Date Level D5.1.1 Report on state-of-the-art 5 The R PU M10 Mapping review of: knowledge on Netherlands (a) existing knowledge of and experience with MHIAP methodology, also in combination methodology, evaluation with health equity (impact) assessments and (b) how countries and regions participating and implementation of in this task have developed their MHIA policy cycle (development – implementation – mental health in all policy evaluation – adaptation) and what lessons can be learned from this. Where possible, (MHIAP) cycles in Europe, the equity lens applied in this work will zoom in on what specific MHIAP approaches at national, regional and may be of particular relevance to specific vulnerable groups. It will also aspire to gather local level, including draft information on possible involvement of PLE in MHIA policy cycles. guidance/blueprint to support countries and This mapping review will leverage existing reviews and position papers on MHIA, as regions/local authorities in well as additional analysis of academic and grey literature, policy documents, reports, the process of developing and case studies from various countries and organizations that have implemented and implementing MHIAP, MHIAP approaches. adapt for new learning, and sustain efforts in this The review will culminate with a translation of the lessons learned from countries and regard. literature into a set of recommendations and guidance to support countries and/or regions in the use of MHIAP methodologies (also to the benefit of vulnerable groups), their potential impact, and their evaluation. Report in English. D5.1.2 Piloting of MHIAP guidance M30 Four Member States (Estonia, Lithuania, Iceland and Slovenia) have already indicated 5 Sweden R PU at local/regional and they would like to pilot the MHIAP guidance. These four countries have the choice to national level (policy action) pilot the guidance at a national policy level or a local/regional policy level. As such, these country pilots will operate as separate case studies, trying out the MHIAP 61 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 guidance within the scope of their specific national/regional context. This will generate helpful feedback on barriers and enables as regards the applicability of the methodology in different real-life settings. (Task) partner countries that do not pilot the guidance themselves will be able to take on an observer role. To facilitate this, a learning lab will be established to enable cross-country learning as well as maximise efficient use of resources. This learning network lab will facilitate exchange of information and (initial) experience of how countries have implemented dapted the draft guidance (deliverable 5.1.1) for their local contexts, what tailoring was needed to make the approach work usable in the local context, discuss implementation experiences, and discuss next steps. It is envisaged that the countries participating in this learning network will have varying experience levels in using MHIAP methodologies (e.g., some more familiar with HIAP as a policy framing, use of health equity impact assessments, perhaps local examples of this). This learning lab will consist therefore of 4 pilot countries and 10 observer countries, who will come together online and in person (where budget and resources permit) to exchange experiences in implementing/adapting the guidance. This will enable 4 different case studies reflecting different contexts to be prepared for inclusion in the final methodology/guidance, which will help give the guidance a more practical focus. D5.1.3 Report on shared learnings 5 M34 Learnings that could be included here (depending on the time they become available) The R PU and identified synergies include JA PREVENT (task 9.2) outcomes, and insights and experiences gathered via Netherlands with and between the capacity-building work under Flagship 1 of the EU Communication on a MENTOR and other EU- RIVM; Comprehensive Approach to Mental Health, implemented by WHO Europe. This will be supported initiatives, Trimbos channeled via a 'practice and policy dialogue’ event. notably on how integrated policies may best support action as regards the promotion of equitable mental health/well-being, also by including inspiring examples. The report will include redrafted guidance on MHIAP approaches D5.2.1 Mapping of existing 5 Hungary M36 This report will map good/best practices (hence already implemented, as well as R PU evidence-based guidelines OKFŐ present in the EC Best Practices Portal),, measures, and strategies with focus on Mental personalized prevention/ Health promotion and prevention at both national and local level focused on young promotion interventions people. The report will emphasize a strong focus on vulnerable populations, providing targeted to young people 62 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 insights into effective strategies for addressing mental health challenges among this demographic. English, PDF D5.2.2 Community program 5 Hungary M36 Based on a set of criteria developed by the partners, this report identifies best practices R PU inventory report OKFŐ in community mental health promotion and prevention programs in various settings (municipalities, schools, kindergartens, social services, workplaces, local communities, etc.) for different target groups (e.g., teachers, social worker, childcare workers, health visitors, parents, carers). The inventory report will contain a set of programs (already implemented by some MS) that could be used by each Country to set community programs for young people addressing the mental health burden. In particular, we will identify and evaluate innovative approaches to preventing and managing mental health problems in various community settings e.g., use of social prescribing (arts, sports etc.) and use of a community-based social franchising approach. This report will include targeted measures and community programs focusing on equity, including specific actions to support vulnerable groups such as migrants, refugees, Roma, and displaced persons from Ukraine. It will also cover actions aimed at reducing health inequalities, particularly among socio-economically disadvantaged populations. Additionally, the report will highlight targeted actions addressing mental health challenges exacerbated by the pandemic.. English, PDF D5.2.3 Developing advocacy 5 Germany, M24 R PU In this Report the results of a digital advocacy strategy will be described. This activity communication materials ULEI foresees a first co-design phase (including adaptation of the media guideline and and setting a digital developing a digital advocacy strategy), that includes PLE and the destigmatization of advocacy strategy young people with problematic substance use. In synergy with D5.2.2 and D5.3.3, we will use the potential power of media as an instrument for preventing and combating all forms of stigmatization and for gaining support for public and societal policies to promote healthier environments, also adapting good practices such as FairMediaSUCHT. English, PDF D5.2.4 Design of training and 5 Spain FFIS, M33 In parallel, Partners will work on the design of a training path targeted to R PU supervision initiatives SMS professionals/educators of different settings. In particular, in this subtask, partners will targeted to professionals/ design a tailored initiative to train the trainers (professionals and educators) on how to educators manage vulnerable mental health of the young people, also using the communication (trainers/teachers) of tools previously developed. A focus will be done to foster the mental resilience of young different settings populations in times of crisis, in order to prevent their negative impact on mental health, to improve populations’ ability to cope with (or the overcoming of) stress and anxiety: lessons learned from the Covid pandemic and other crisis, exploring how to prevent and 63 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 mitigate their impact on the general population and on vulnerable groups, develop guidelines to disseminate in members states. English, PDF D5.3.1 Valorizing current good 5 Germany M12 Partners will implement the following steps: R PU practices of PLE SB; involvement in MH services 1. Collection of good practices / experiences in different countries and community settings Italy ASL 2. Development of strategies for PLE involvement in mental health including Turin prevention and health promotion 3. Dissemination of current best practices on social inclusion for individuals with mental health conditions by leveraging studies conducted in this field as well as the experience gained from previous successful European projects. A document of strategies for PLE involvement for countries on different levels of participation will be produced as expected outcome. English, PDF. D5.3.2 Development of models of 5 Germany M24 Country needs, capacity and starting conditions will inform the development of this R PU training and peer support SB; deliverable which will be organised in the following steps: tools and development of evaluation tools Italy ASL - design of tailored trainings and support exchange tools, targeted to peer Turin supporters (i.e., peer networks) - Online „Train the Trainer“workshops, to build on country capacity to train PLE - Delivery of trainings in countries who decided to actively implementing actions - Evaluation of test phase outcomes by research activities - Development of recommendations for improving MH services/strategies from lessons learned The meaningful involvement of PLE in the co-production, i.e., working together at any level of action, will be ensured during the entire project. English, PDF. D5.3.3 Guidelines and 5 Germany M36 Document to define a destigmatization strategy of MH issues to be implemented at R PU recommendations for a SB; National level. This guidelines will promote the exchange of experiences among MH destigmatization strategy at professionals and PLEs regarding successful implementation processes and defining National level Italy ASL collaboration protocols and procedures. In synergy with the approach of the MHIAP , Turin Partners will define recommendations for a strategy on: - promotion and prevention of good MH and wellbeing, such as prevention of suicide and depression 64 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 - Reduction of stigma and promotion of social inclusion, especially supporting the transition from youth to adult care - Improvement of mental health systems, supporting recovery-oriented services and to reduce stigma, through the inclusion of PLE voice, knowledge and practice D5.4.1 Knowledge exchange 5 Italy ISS 12 Assessment of local population’ needs, services and policies by a Panel of R PU report representatives from ministries, public agencies, mental health and social work professionals, municipalities and people with lived experiences. -Establishment of the panel with public and private organizations - Preparation and dissemination of a survey to collect: 1. needs, suggestions and critical issues observed by the population in each country; 2. information about Social and health services devoted to care of people with mental health disorders (MHDs); 3. country policies on integrated social-health pathway for people with MHDs. - Analysis of data collected by the survey and preparation of the Knowledge exchange report with information collected by the countries involved in the task. D5.4.2 Definition of an integrated 5 Italy ISS M21 Definition and description of the key components of the integrated care pathway in MH R PU care pathway shared through: among EU Members state 1. Identification of the key components of the integrated care pathway among countries (based on the information collected by D.5.4.1) for promoting social inclusion and quality of life of people with MHDs 2. Publication of the document through the JA website for the collection of comments and suggestions by the stakeholders (i.e., MH clinical centers, PLE, NGOs, Municipalities, etc.). All comments and notes will be shared within the Panel to make adjustments and the final document will be defined. 3.Translation of the final document in all the different European languages. D5.4.3 Assessment report on 5 Italy ISS 33 Implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway among EU Member R PU effectiveness and States: Impact evaluations will be conducted to assess the effectiveness and outcomes outcomes of implemented of implemented interventions. intervention - Development of guidelines for implementing the integrated care pathway among EU Member States (in the Social and health services). - Training of professionals - Implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway among a sample of people with MHDs. The care pathway will be assessed using the online tool for self- assessment of integrated care and standardized outcome measures and quality of life assessments to objectively track improvements in mental health and overall well-being. - Analyze data, gather feedback, and make improvements as needed to enhance the quality of care provided. 65 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 D5.4.4 Advocacy Report on 5 Italy ISS 36 Partners will identify, collect and share best and promising practices on a R PU Community-Based Mental comprehensive community-based approach to MH. They will advocate for policies that Health Policy Prioritization prioritize community-based MH care within EU Member States. The Panel will formulate in EU Member States distinct sets of tailor-made recommendations and their rollout for implementation for three distinct target audiences: 1.Social and Health Ministers: The Panel will provide specific policy guidance to Ministers responsible for healthcare and related sectors. These recommendations will be informed by evidence-based practices and aimed at promoting systemic improvements in mental health care delivery. 2.Professionals 3.General public Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Work Package 6 Work Package 6: Innovative Digital Solutions for Improving Mental Health across Europe Duration: M1 - M36 Lead Beneficiary: Norway (NIPH), co-lead: Iceland (DOHI) Objectives A multi-level approach is pivotal for promoting mental health within the framework of the MHIAP. This encompasses interventions on the international, national, regional, local, and individual levels. WP 5 adopts a comprehensive strategy aiming at developing and sharing plans, guidelines, and policy documents for health authorities at local, regional, and national levels rooted in evidence-based and best practice solutions. The individual level is crucial in mental health promotion due to the direct impact of mental health issues and resilience at the individual level, as well as the need for comprehensive monitoring of mental health within populations. Therefore, it is essential to incorporate individual-level interventions and assessments in mental health promotion initiatives. WP6 complements WP5 by promoting and delivering evidence based, effective and adaptable tools for promoting good mental health, assessing mental health in European Societies and thus also creating awareness for mental health problems. WP 6 will coordinate especially with task 5.2 to ensure consistent criteria for digital and non/digital instruments for early detection, prevention and treatment of mental health problems and to insure effective communication of the generated results. Interventions and assessments at the individual level can be cost-prohibitive and inaccessible for marginalized groups, especially if they rely on one-on-one interactions. Furthermore, language barriers often hinder access to these services for vulnerable groups such as migrants and refugees. Hence WP6 is dedicated to leveraging modern technology to facilitate 66 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 the efficient development and deployment of innovative web-based tools for mental health promotion and assessment. These tools can be used by authorities on all levels helping the effectuation of plans and policies, essential for addressing the needs of vulnerable populations. WP6 identifies, pilots and evaluates innovative approaches to preventing and managing mental health problems. Through the development and promotion of these tools, WP6 aims to improve the ability to identify individuals at risk, enhance access to evidence- based innovative approaches and scale up affordable interventions. Ultimately, these efforts are directed towards improving the quality of life for patients and their families. The first task in WP 6 is to identify, collect, and share best and promising practices for web-based mental health interventions. All project participants will be invited to supply their best examples of effective preventive or promoting methods, in order to build a pool of methods and tools, which can be shared with other MS. The potential for upscaling and sharing to other Member States (MS) will be facilitated. The second task will be devoted to adapting and implementing promising digital tools for diverse target groups. We will focus on implementing 3 solutions: A platform to manage mental health at community level, a wellbeing app aimed at individuals focusing on young people and vulnerable groups and an online platform to facilitate physical exercise for people with mental health difficulties. The third group of tasks in WP 6 involves developing evidence based digital tools to assess mental health problems and related risk and protective factors through self-reports. After adapting the instrument for use in different MS and in particular also for use by marginalized and vulnerable communities, WP 6 will conduct a pilot study to map mental health, especially also persons displaced from Ukraine, in different MS. WP 6 will also prepare a digital self-administered version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). CIDI is developed and maintained by WHO, and it is a tool to assess the prevalence of mental disorders and the need for mental health care services in adults. The digital self- administered version of CIDI will be validated against the interviewer administered version of CIDI in Norway. The digital, self-administered version of CIDI will be made available to MS in cooperation with the WHO. Finally, WP 6 will also adjust, translate and pilot a web-based screening tool designed for the assessment of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) and additional determinants that affect mental health in children and youth. In sum WP 6 will create a digital repository for mental health promotion and assessment and support the dissemination of tested tools into member states. By achieving these goals, WP 6 will: - Support mental health especially also in vulnerable groups, including migrants, refugees, young people and people with less education and less socio-economic resources. - Contribute to better and earlier detection of individuals at risk of developing mental health problems. - Improve access to evidence based and best practice innovative approaches and methods to promoting wellbeing and managing mental health conditions in different settings. throughout the life course, targeting diverse population groups across Europe, including vulnerable groups. - Improve access and help to up-scale public health interventions in Member States. - Identify, pilot, and evaluate innovative approaches to monitoring, preventing, and managing mental health problems. Activities and division of work (WP description) Task Task Description Participants In- No Name kind Name Role Contr. & Subc ontr 67 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 T6.1 Overview This task provides an overview and assessment of existing effective and efficient strategies for diverse purposes related Iceland No of existing to mental health. The first subtask involves mapping accessible, effective digital mental health tools that could be shared (DOHI, COO effective and upscaled across Europe, working in synergy with task 5.1 and 5.2. The upscaling of best practice tools will be PHCI) AE and facilitated. The second subtask addresses the negative effects of digital technology use, delivering an overview of effective Norway efficient preventative strategies for early problematic digital technology use (PDTU). The results of the following task will be (NIPH, BEN/AE strategies: presented in an integrated manner with the results of task 5.2.1, which also describes standard (not digital) interventions. HDIR) Mental 6.1.1: Sharing and up-scaling best practice digital mental health solutions across the wider EU (Subtask lead: BEN health Iceland and Norway) Denmark promotion Activity 6.1.1.1: Identify available online best practice tools in all participating countries (RSD) and PDTU Provide an overview of existing, evidence-based online tools aimed at promotion of good mental health, or prevention, or BEN treatment of mental health problems. This task will identify markers of evidence-based interventions in collaboration with Germany task 5.2.1 and extend those to included markers of successful digital interventions. All participating countries will be asked (BZgA), to share 3-5 examples of best practice available digital tools, and provide information such as: target age group, available BEN, language versions, knowledge basis/evidence for the tool’s effectiveness, status of piloting or full-scale implementation, Italy (ISS, etc. Additionally, information about successes and challenges will be collected. An emphasis will be on accessibility, i.e., AE ProMIS) free/low cost, easily adaptable tools. The catalogue of best practices for young people from task 5.2. will be considered. The EU best practice portal will also be used and also the national portals of the participating countries. This task will also BEN Hungary evaluate transferability of tools, to identify tool with high potential for transfer to multiple countries. (NNGYK) Activity 6.1.1.2: Workshop on transferring cross-sector services to other participating countries Estonia As a complement to activity 6.1.1.1, this activity will focus on services that directly address youths and on reaching youths (Mosa) BEN via social media and cross-sector online services. The Norwegian DigiUng team has participated in numerous cross- project learning initiatives and will organize an online international workshop for sharing knowledge and experience on Spain the development of cross sector online services and the use of digital platforms targeting mental health problems – offering (Biosistem BEN services that cut across sectors and mirror the complexity of mental health problems and their treatments. Based on the ak, input from workshop participants this activity will seek to identify promising solutions which, if possible, should be made IDIVAL, AE accessible throughout Europe. ICO, AE 6.1.2: Preventing early problematic digital technology use (PDTU): situation analysis and recommendations for FUNDES action (Subtask lead: Slovenia) ALUD, AE FRCB- The aim of this subtask is to provide an overview and assessment of existing preventive strategies (or lack thereof) in the AE IDIBAPS/ field of early problematic digital technology use (PDTU) and to agree upon recommendations for effective early PDTU AE HCB, prevention for EU countries. The task will consist of reviewing existing policies, regulations, and strategic documents GENCAT AE aimed at reducing PDTU at the EU or national level. Each participating MS will be guided through a stakeholder analysis SAS) AE to identify all stakeholder groups relevant to addressing the issue of early PDTU. Workshops with stakeholder representatives will be conducted in (each) participating MS within 6.1.2 subtask by MS themselves to identify various The good practices (and their key features), as well as strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and barriers in several areas for Netherlan successful early PDTU prevention. Based on feedback from various countries, recommendations for effective early PDTU ds (RIVM, prevention will be provided in the form of a report as the main deliverable, at either the EU level or JA level (participating Trimbos) MS), depending on the similarity of findings. BEN/AE 68 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Cyprus (SHSO- BEN MHS) Slovenia BEN (NIJZ), Ukraine (PHC) BEN Italy (ISS, ProMIS) BEN/AE Romania (NCMHFA BEN D) T6.2 Adapting Whereas task 6.1 aims to give an overview about tools available in different countries, 6.2 aims to make available specific Iceland and COO tools for MS. This task works on developing and adapting online solutions that can be upscaled to help to promote better (DOHI, piloting mental health and prevent mental disorders on different intervention levels and for different target groups. The first subtask PHCI) online tools aims to enable organisations and local government entities to better support mental health by adapting an online platform AE to support with tools, information and guidelines for promoting mental health. We will target different sectors influencing mental health Norway and such as municipalities, schools, and workplaces. The second subtask is an individual digital mental wellbeing tool where (NIPH) BEN promote MS will collaborate on the design and reaching out to vulnerable groups for user testing to maximise usability and mental Denmark BEN effectiveness. Whenever tools are adapted, task 6.2 will make sure that adaptations are in line with criteria of best practice health (RSD) tools summarized in task 5.2. Estonia BEN 6.2.1 Improve and adapt an online platform and guidelines for mental health promotion for municipalities, schools, (MOSA) and workplaces (Subtask lead: Iceland) Italy (ISS, The aim of this task is to provide participating countries with a promising tool/online platform for improving mental health ProMIS) BEN and wellbeing in community settings. Iceland has developed an evidence-based approach with guidelines for health Spain AE promotion, including mental health and wellbeing, for municipalities, schools, and workplaces. The guidelines are available on a free online platform, including checklists that can be used to evaluate the current state of the setting, track progress, (Biosistem BEN and inform plans for improvement. The approach is based on the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, (Mental) Health in ak, All Policies, Healthy Cities, and Health Promoting Schools (Schools for Health Europe – SHE) developed by the World IDIVAL, AE Health Organization, as well as previous experience of other comparable work in Iceland and abroad. The criteria were ICO, FUNDES AE based on current data and literature on evidence-based methods on mental health promotion and were a product of cocreation between professionals at the Directorate of Health in Iceland and focus groups comprised of experts in the ALUD, AE field. In this subtask firstly the guidelines will be translated into English and participating MS will work together as well as FRCB- within MS to evaluate and improve the platform and checklists. Secondly, based on the common English versions, MS IDIBAPS/ AE identify core principles that are valid in all member states. Thirdly in the MS the core principles are translated, and local HCB, 69 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 principles / guidelines/tools are added. Fourthly in a feedback loop, MS meet to see some of the added local principles GENCAT AE and decide which ones are added to the core principles. The final platform is developed based on these four factors. SAS) AE As part of the development and improvement participating MS will test the platform with relevant user groups, sharing the Hungary results to inform the improvement of the platform, especially considering the needs of vulnerable/marginalized groups (for (NNGYK) instance older people, refugees, and displaced people from Ukraine etc.). The end product is informed by the user testing, BEN to reflect their policies and needs of MS. Online workshops will be held on the process of co-creation/adaptation of the Germany guidelines and on how to attract and engage communities to use the platform to their advantage. Synergies with WP 5.1 (BZgA) BEN and 5.2 will be explored. The final product (online workspace and guidelines/checklists for mental health promotion in Ukraine schools, municipalities, and workplaces at policy level) and all translations/adaptations will be made available to all MS at (PHC) no cost and free licence to use (open access). BEN Cyprus 6.2.2 Adapting, evaluating, and piloting a digital mental health tool for individual mental health promotion (SHSO- (Subtask lead: Iceland) MHS) BEN The aim of this task is to give people across Europe, with a special focus on young people and marginalized groups, Romania access to a free, innovative, effective self-help tool, HappApp, based on their needs. HappApp is a mental health promoting (NCMHFA app containing evidence-based interventions aimed at increasing psychological wellbeing and improving mental health D) literacy. The methods/exercises have also been shown to mitigate symptoms of depression and anxiety. The methods and BEN interventions are grounded in positive psychology, mindfulness, and self-compassion. Their effectiveness in enhancing Netherlan mental health has been documented in peer-reviewed research studies. ds (RIVM, Trimbos) BEN/AE The app was developed in Iceland for individual use by the public but is now being re-designed with special emphasis on appealing to young people and marginalized groups with an added focus on combatting loneliness and isolation. Participating MS will come together in this subtask to collaborate on the redesign and adaptation of the app, involving young people and other potential user groups in the process through surveys, focus groups and user testing. Efforts will be made to reach vulnerable groups such as people with lived experiences and people in long-term unemployment to ensure the app is applicable to those groups as well. Lessons from WP 5.3 regarding processes, procedures and protocols for efficient co-working will be considered in the design process. The tool will be piloted in Iceland and participating countries after completion of the developmental phase. Before MENTOR starts in the fall of 2024 Iceland plans to have published a small version of the app with core functionalities (a few interventions) in Icelandic and English with the aim of adding more interventions in collaboration with participating countries and through focus groups feedback. Participating countries will do workshops/focus groups and take part in developing the app further. In this way the app will be scaled up and developed in collaboration with participating countries and users/focus groups from each country with the aim to make it accessible to a wide range of people across Europe. Next step is doing a pilot test of the app in participating countries where they can choose if they test the English version of the app or translate it into their language. It is possible to offer the app in several languages.This is an individual-level intervention aimed at improving access to a diverse range of evidence-based methods to ensure opportunity for personalization of the tool. Research on the use of mental health apps has shown promising results with regard to improving mental health and the advantage of HappApp is that it is completely free of charge and designed by mental health professionals. By combining the efforts of MS through this JA, the app will be further developed, targeting 70 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 a wider group in Europe. Our aim is to make the App available in the European region through standard App-Stores (Apple/Android) in English and in the languages of participating countries. T6.3 Innovative, The aim is to prepare and improve access to best practice digital assessment tools for mental health problems and Norway COO best associated risk factors across Europe to help monitoring mental health problems and to improve detection of individuals (NIPH, AE practice at risk of developing mental health problems. Effective (both regarding costs and time), validated measurement of mental SSB) solutions to health also provide health authorities with necessary and relevant information for considering and implementing assessing preventative and treatment initiatives. Task 6.3 directly addresses two focal points of the call, mental health Hungary BEN and awareness and literacy, by providing a platform to learn about mental health problems. Task 6.3 is linked to task (NNGYK, AE monitoring 5.1 (Advancing mental health in all policies) by providing a tool to make mental health problems and the effect of policies OKFŐ, AE the mental Bethesda) for mental health visible, it is linked to Task 5.2 (Supporting prevention) by providing a tool for early detection of individuals health status at risk to developing mental health problems. Task 6.3 will coordinate its activities with 5.1 and 5.2 to ensure the development of tools that fit well with other best-practice tools and processes. Our aim is to facilitate the transfer and Germany BEN across (BZgA, Europe translation of 3 digital assessment tools across MSs, including web-based clinical interviews and assessments of factors AE ULEI), affecting mental health, thus making them accessible for participating countries. Translation can be facilitated by the use of AI tools like ChatGPT, combined with quality control by native speakers. Accessibility of the tools especially also for BEN Spain vulnerable groups will be achieved by using AI methods to complement reading of questions with listening to them (TTS, (Biosistem text to speech service) or interacting with automated talking heads. Acquiring data by use of the same methods across ak, AE MS will facilitate comparison and analysis of risk and protective factors on large data sets. IDIVAL, AE ICO, 6.3.1 Validate and further develop the web-based self-administered CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic FUNDES AE Interview) ALUD, AE In the 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) initiated the World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative, launching FRCB- AE cross-national studies to assess the prevalence and treatment of mental disorders. This initiative was designed to aid IDIBAPS/ countries in collecting essential data for mental health care planning and resource distribution. For this purpose, the HCB, AE Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), a standardized diagnostic tool, was developed. It has since been GENCAT, utilized in over 30 countries, providing comparable data across nations. To improve accessibility and lower the costs AE SAS) associated with conducting prevalence studies, a digital self-administered version of CIDI was introduced, with a pilot AE recently conducted in Norway. In MENTOR this digital version is being further developed for smartphone use, aiming to Ukraine AE make it widely available including vulnerable groups and minority groups. Further, we aim to conduct validation studies to (PHC) ensure its comparability with the traditional interviewer-administered CIDI. In the validation studies we will examine BEN sampling/fieldwork effects and mode effects. The validation work will be headed by Statistics Norway, and to improve the value of this work other MS are invited to participate. A validated digital version of CIDI adapted for smartphones will be Cyprus made available for MS in collaboration with WHO. (SHSO- MS) BEN 6.3.2 Validate and prepare for up-scaling of a web-based self-report questionnaire of mental health problems and risk factors for youth Iceland Several screening instruments currently exist to assess mental health problems in children and youth via self-reports. (DOHI) These include the SDQ, YSR, DAWBA, BCFPI, and the Kiddie-SADS, which vary in length, accuracy, and accessibility. PHCI) BEN However, a user-friendly screening instrument that is widely accessible across Europe does not currently exist. Drawing on work from Norway, MENTOR aims to develop a web-based assessment tool that strikes a balance between brevity AE 71 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 and precision in measuring common mental health issues like Anxiety, Depression, and ADHD. We will focus particularly Denmark on ensuring the tool’s accessibility for individuals from marginalized populations. Our plan involves two main initiatives: (RSD) (a) employing AI to provide cost-efficient translations, thus facilitating the tool’s expansion to various countries and demographic groups within Europe, and (b) increasing accessibility by using AI to create low-literacy versions of the tool. Estonia BEN In such versions, AI-generated talking heads could read questions to the users, if desired. To ensure the transferability of (MOSA) the assessment tools to different MS, we will use existing validated versions of questionnaires where possible and otherwise complement AI based translations by quality assurance with local experts in MS. The input of mental health Latvia BEN experts from JA member organizations and the involvement of young people in the design process will be crucial for (RPNC) quality assurance and the development of a tool that is appropriate for the target group. We implement an evidence-based assessment of adolescents' mental health by relying on validated instruments, like e.g. Poland the YSR or BCFPI which are brief and yet allow identification of different types of mental health problems. Using tools that (NHF) BEN identify a broader range of mental health problems also supports the transferability to different MS which may differ in the prevalence of different mental health problems. As an additional building block for transferability, the assessment tool will BEN consist of a core-section and supplementary sections that allow MS to customize the assessment to fit their specific needs. Romania We will ensure scalability of the developed solution by hosting the assessment-tool on a platform that can be accessed in (NCMHFA all member states. This includes especially also using a data-storage solution that is compliant with data-protection laws D) in different countries and with GDPR regulations. If possible, we will use existing EU solutions, like EUSurvey Slovenia BEN (https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/) as a platform. Data and information about mental health can only have an impact if it (NIJZ) can be communicated well. Therefore, the assessment-platform will also be able to generate automated reports that users (e.g. health authorities) can access and communicate with relevant policy and decision makers. Italy (ISS) BEN In addition to providing an additional implementation of the platform, we will also pilot the assessment tool in MSs, such that the end-result of the work package will be an internationally tested assessment-tool that can be accessed from member states. We will specifically pilot the platform by using it to assess mental health of displaced Ukrainian youth in Europe, thus explicitly covering the call’s objective to address mental health in refugees and persons displaced from BEN Ukraine. 6.3.3 Adapt, pilot, and translate a web-based screening tool for assessments of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and other factors impacting mental health in children and youth. ACEs represent significant threats to the mental health and wellbeing in children, potentially leading to lifelong negative impacts on health. Despite increasing awareness of its harmful effects, there remains a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding the prevalence and types of ACEs that children are exposed to. This knowledge is imperative for preventative action. In response, this task aims to develop and pilot a web-based instrument for assessing ACEs and other factors impacting children’s mental health and well-being. The tool will be piloted in Hungary and subsequently made available to other MSs participating in this JA. The proposed instrument will leverage the digital version of the ACE International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ), developed by the WHO. The ACE-IQ is a comprehensive measure that assesses 13 types of childhood adversity, allowing for evaluation of ACE scores based on both frequency and severity of adverse experiences. The measure evaluates the responses on a continuous scale with a maximum score of 13. By translating the ACE-IQ into national languages, scores and prevalence rates can be compared across participating countries. The digital version of the ACE-IQ could be integrated into the web-based self-administered screening instrument outlined in Task 6.3.2, or existing platforms such as https://ec.europa.eu/eusurvey/ may be used. The comprehensive screening instrument incorporating the ACE questionnaire, will be administered to a representative sample of primary- and secondary school students aged 12-19. Previous studies have demonstrated the applicability of the ACE questionnaire in 72 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 this population. Since comprehensive data is lacking in assessing the prevalence of ACEs in this population the findings of this assessment could be an important input for policymakers. By identifying marginalized (disadvantaged or Roma) or particularly vulnerable subgroups (migrants, refugees, or displaced persons from Ukraine) within the school population through this digital measure, policymakers can gain a better understanding of vulnerabilities and special needs, thereby informing targeted intervention and prevention programs. This task seeks to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of ACEs and their impact on children's mental health, ultimately guiding evidence-based policy and intervention strategies to support the well-being of children and youth across Europe. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) Milestone Milestone Name WP Lead Description Due Means of Verification No No Benef Date iciary MS33 Online platform and guidelines for mental 6 IS Participating countries will work together to evaluate 12 Confirmation and go-ahead from health promotion for municipalities, and improve the platform. User groups relevant for the lead beneficiaries, guidelines schools, and workplaces are ready for different settings (municipalities, schools, workplaces) sent out to participants for testing in MS will be engaged in testing, and we will make sure that translation. the needs of vulnerable/marginalized groups across the EU are considered. Workshop on how involve stakeholders in the use of 24 One or more workshops have MS34 Workshop on how to attract and engage 6 IS an online platform and guidelines for health promotion been held for Member States. communities to use the platform to their advantage. in the community; schools, workplaces and Timing will be decided after municipalities. Knowledge and experience of the project has started. platform will be shared. MS35 Workshop on transferring parts of or whole 6 NO Workshop for sharing knowledge and experience on 24 One or more workshops have interventions to other participating the development of cross sector online services and been held for Member States. countries the use of digital platforms targeting mental health Timing will be decided after problems – offering services that cuts across sectors project has started. and mirrors the complexity of mental health problems and their treatments MS36 Selected digital tools ready for piloting 6 NO/H The digital tools in the WP that are to be piloted are 24 Confirmation by lead beneficiaries U/IS ready (digital mental health interventions, HappApp and participating MS that BCFPI, ACE, etc). preparation is completed and for go-ahead of pilot 73 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Deliver- Deliverable Name WP Lead Type Dissem Due Description able No No Beneficia ination Date (including format and language) ry Level D6.1.1 Web resource for best practice 6 Iceland/N Web resource PU 24 The descriptions and links to the tools will be published online in methods orway English. The web resource will be available for all, building on experiences from Member States on how they gather information on digital solutions at present. E.g., in Norway, information on evaluated interventions and methods for young people, operational ratings, and data on evaluation and implementation are gathered on a site called Ungsinn.no. D6.1.2 Recommendations for action on 6 Slovenia Written and online PU 32 A set of recommendations for action, based on report on PDTU early problematic digital documents related policies, regulations and strategic documents, Stakeholder technology use (PDTU) analysis report, report on workshops’ results and SWOT analysis prevention report on early PDTU prevention. E-leaflet or infographics on recommendations for action, (optionally) translated in to participating MS languages. D6.2.1 Guidelines/checklists for an 6 Iceland Online documents PU 30 The guidelines/checklists will be translated by each country, making online platfom for mental health sure that they are easily adaptable across the EU. The final product promotion in the community: and all translations/adaptations will be available to all MS at no cost. schools, workplaces and municipalities D6.2.2 Evaluation of the pilot of Happ 6 Iceland Evaluation report PU 32 This digital mental health tool will be adapted to meet the needs of app young people and vulnerable groups and will be piloted in Iceland and participating countries. The pilot test will be evaluated for suitability and effectiveness based on previously determined objectives and criteria. Feedback and suggestions will be reviewed, and strengths as well as shortcomings and limitations identified. An online report on this will be published and shared with all participating countries. D6.3.1 Validated version of the CIDI 6 Norway Online assessment PU 33 A validated digital version of CIDI adapted for smartphones will be tool made available in several languages for MS in collaboration with WHO. D6.3.2 Online solution for self-report of 6 Norway Online assessment PU 33 An online assessment tool for mental health problems in mental health in adolescence tool adolescents available in multiple languages. The tool will have versions that facilitate participation of marginalized groups with 74 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 low low-literacy. And support scaling up into MS by being hosted compliant with data protection laws in MS. D6.3.3 Scalable digital self- 6 Hungary Online assessment PU 27 A digital screening instrument including items from the ACE-IQ administered clinical tool (Adverse Childhood Experiences – International Questionnaire), assessment tools of well-being with additional questions concerning wellbeing will be piloted in and threats to mental health anonymous groups of youth recruited from high school. Estimated budget — Resources See detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B). Subcontracting Subcontracting Give details on subcontracted project tasks (if any) and explain the reasons why (as opposed to direct implementation by the Beneficiaries/Affiliated Entities). Subcontracting — Subcontracting means the implementation of ‘action tasks’, i.e. specific tasks which are part of the EU grant and are described in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. Note: Subcontracting concerns the outsourcing of a part of the project to a party outside the consortium. It is not simply about purchasing goods or services. We normally expect that the participants have sufficient operational capacity to implement the project activities themselves. Subcontracting should therefore be exceptional. Include only subcontracts that comply with the rules (i.e. best value for money and no conflict of interest; no subcontracting of coordinator tasks). Work Subcontract Subcontract Description Estimated Justification Best-Value-for-Money Package No Name (including task number and BEN/AE to which it is Costs (why is subcontracting necessary?) (how do you intend to ensure No (continuous (subcontracted linked) (EUR) it?) numbering action tasks) linked to WP) 4 S1.1 T4.2 Training: How to communicate with 10 000,00 NIJZ has no internal expertise or Market research and policymakers for consortium members (NIJZ) specialized resources to provide the procurement procedures training on the specific topic as national laws requires 75 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 5 S1.2 T5.2.2 The estimated cost of the intervention to be 43 449.60 The intervention must subcontract Procurement procedures performed by FFIS in the framework of Task qualified personnel (2 sport physical as national laws requires 5.2 educators) to carry out the intervention 6 S1.3 T6.1 and 6.2 The estimated costs of the subcontracted 5 000,00 External experts to support and advice Procurement procedures external experts to support GENCAT in WP6 the participation in WP6 as national laws requires activities. Other issues: Not applicable If subcontracting for the project goes beyond 30% of the total eligible costs, give specific reasons. Timetable Timetable (projects of more than 2 years) Fill in cells in beige to show the duration of activities. Repeat lines/columns as necessary. Note: Use actual calendar years and quarters. In the timeline you should indicate the timing of each activity per WP. You may add additional columns if your project is longer than 6 years. YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 ACTIVITY Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Task 1.1. Setting up Consortium structures 1.1.1. Establishing the organizational structure of the Consortium 1.1.2 Developing and implementing the Project handbook 1.1.3. Managing the relevant governing management, performing and advisory bodies T.1.2. Ensuring smooth management and goal-oriented implementation of the project 76 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 1.2.1. Developing project management plans and tools 1.2.2. Planning and organizing implementation process at regular interval 1.2.3. Monitor the progress of WPs and oversee conformity with the Consortium rules 1.2.4. Organize meetings on a regular basis to follow-up the progress of work and mitigate risks T.1.3. Ensuring project financial compliance 1.3.1. Financial accounting. A quarterly financial report, which will include a periodic financial report on expenditure and budget utilisation. 1.3.2. Monitoring and control. The Financial Management Group, responsible for overseeing financial operations, reviewing expenditure requests and ensuring compliance with financial policies and rules. T.1.4. Contribution to evaluation of the interventions implemented 1.4.1. Evaluation of the content and impact of interventions in close cooperation with WP5 and WP6 leaders and co-leaders 1.4.2. Review and acceptance of deliverables and dissemination documents 1.4.3 - Assist in scientific and methodological background of WP-5 and WP-6, assist the communication with stakeholders and policy makers to meet the results of JA 1.4.4. - Enhancing and support the knowledge sharing and transfer of practices of distribution and sustainability of cooperation with WP-5 and WP-6 leaders and co-leaders T.1.5. Coordinating collaboration with stakeholders T.2.1. Brand and identity 2.1.1 - Creating a strong brand identity for the JA MH (logo, presentation templates, graphical charter for the website and other dissemination materials) 77 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 2.1.2 - Manage the use of the logo, presentation templates, graphic sheet for the website and other dissemination materials T.2.2. Dissemination targets Activity 2.2.1 - Prepare and distribute a survey to JA participating countries to collect quantitative and qualitative data. Activity 2.2.2 - Identification and mapping of key stakeholders and their needs T.2.3. Website and social media for the project 2.3.1 - Creation and maintenance of the JA MENTOR website 2.3.2 - Running a YouTube channel dedicated to the JA MENTOR 2.3.3 - Social media activity 2.3.4 - Other dissemination activities T.2.4. Communication and dissemination strategy 2.4.1 - Development, implementation and updating of a communication and dissemination strategy 2.4.2 - Develop an action plan for partners to ensure that IAM is visible at all levels. T.2.5. Dissemination events and final conference 2.5.1 - Organization of various dissemination events 2.5.2 - Organisation of the final conference 2.5.3 - Preparation of a Final Report on Dissemination and Communication Activities in JA MENTOR T.3.1. Project Evaluation 78 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 3.1.1. Development of the Project Evaluation Plan (PEP) 3.1.2. Deployment of the Project Evaluation Plan T.3.2. Impact Evaluation 3.2.1. Development and dissemination of Impact Assessment Plan (IAP) 3.2.2. Impact assessment of Mentor in Europe (MS and regional governments) T.4.1. Support of sustainability of MENTOR pilot implementations 4.1.1 Sustainability Situation Analysis 4.1.2 Evaluating pilots towards sustainability based on the Impact Assessment Plan (IAP) 4.1.3 Sustainability Action Plan 4.1.4 Final Sustainability Report T.4.2. Bridging the Research-Policy Divide through Skill Development 4.2.1. Pre-post assessment of the training 4.2.2. Training the Mentor consortium member for strengthening public health experts/researchers' capacity for policy engagement T.4.3. Strategic stakeholder engagement and advocacy through thematic workshops and policy dialogues to enhance sustainability T.4.4. Collaboration between joint actions related to mental health to foster high-level policy sustainability T.5.1. Advancing MHIAP: methods to evaluate and deliver at national &regional level 5.1.1 Mapping review resulting in a draft MHIAP guidance 5.1.2 Piloting of draft guidance at local/regional and national level, supported by cross-national learning lab. 79 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 5.1.3 Policy and practice dialogue and final drafting of MHIAP guidance T.5.2. Supporting prevention, promotion actions targeted to young people in community setting 5.2.1. Mapping evidence-based guidelines 5.2.2. Identifying Community Program Inventory: 5.2.3. Anti-stigma advocacy 5.2.4. Design of training and supervision initiatives targeted to professionals/ educators (trainers/teachers) of different settings T.5.3. Involvement and joint ownership of people with lived experience (PLE) in mental health policies 5.3.1. Valorising current good practices of PLE involvement in MH services and community settings 5.3.2. Development of models of training and peer support tools and development of evolution tools 5.3.3. Guidelines and recommendations for a destigmatization strategy at National level T.5.4. Integrated care pathway for promoting social inclusion and quality of life of people with Mental Health disorders 5.4.1.Survey dissemination and analysis 5.4.2. Definition of an integrated care pathway 5.4.3. Pilot implementation and monitoring of the integrated care pathway 5.4.4. Definition and dissemination of community-based mental health policies T.6.1. Overview of existing effective and efficient strategies: Mental health promotion and PDTU 6.1.1. Sharing and up-scaling best practise digital mental health solutions across the wider EU 80 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 6.1.2. Preventing early problematic digital technology use (PDTU): situation analysis and recommendations for #§WRK-PLA- action WP§# T.6.2 Adapting and piloting online tools to support and promote mental health 6.2.1. Improve and adapt an online platform and guidelines for mental health promotion for municipalities, schools, and workplaces 6.2.2. Adapting, evaluating, and piloting a digital mental health tool for individual mental health promotion T.6.3. Innovative best practise solutions to assessing and monitoring the mental health status across Europe 6.3.1 Validate and further develop the web based self-administered CIDI (Composite International Diagnostic Interview) 6.3.2 Validate and prepare for up-scaling of a web-based self-report questionnaire of mental health problems and risk factors for youth 6.3.3 Adapt, pilot, and translate a web-based screening tool for assessments of Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) and other factors impacting mental health in children and youth. 81 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 #@ETH-ICS-EI@# 5. OTHER 5.1 Ethics Ethics If the Call document contains a section on ethics, describe ethics issues that may arise during the project implementation and the measures you intend to take to solve/avoid them. Ethical issues will be under ongoing review throughout the project. JA MENTOR will comply with the laws and regulations on ethics in each participating country, for example by informing and/or seeking approval from ethics committees where appropriate. Good clinical practice in accordance with international standards will be used in all interventions. As MENTOR involves several digital solutions, issues of data security, privacy and transparency must be addressed to avoid the misuse of personal data. Data protection regulations will be adhered to. If third parties and shared technology is involved, it needs to be clear which party is responsible for the data security. Participation will be voluntary, and participants will be made aware of how their data will be used and the level of privacy (anonymity/confidentiality). Informed consent for data collection will be obtained from participants where needed. For young people aged 16-18, parents will also be informed. If tools are piloted for a younger age group, parental consent will be obtained. Digital disparity must also be addressed. Some have limited access to digital technologies and lack digital literacy. Digital accessibility standards will be used, and usability testing will be done among various groups. Where sensitive issues are addressed, if there is a potential of evoking negative feelings, participants will be informed of where they can seek support on a local/national level. #§ETH-ICS-EI§# #@SEC-URI-SU@# 5.2 Security Security If the Call document contains a section on security, describe security issues that may arise during the project implementation and the measures you intend to take to solve/avoid them. Indicate if there is need for EU classification of information (Decision 2015/444) or any other specific security measures. Project proposal does not raise any security issues. #§SEC-URI-SU§# #@DEC-LAR-DL@# 6. DECLARATIONS Higher funding rate (if applicable) YES/NO Do you fulfil the conditions set out in the Call document for a higher funding rate? YES If YES, explain and provide details. The project qualifies to the exceptional utility: the consortium includes more than 14 Member States (21 in total) and more than four of them have GNI per inhabitant less than 90% of the EU average. Double funding Information concerning other EU grants for this project YES/NO 82 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Please note that there is a strict prohibition of double funding from the EU budget (except under EU Synergies actions). We confirm that to our best knowledge neither the project as a whole nor any parts of it have benefitted from any other EU grant (including EU funding managed by authorities in EU Member States or other funding bodies, e.g. EU Regional Funds, EU Agricultural Funds, etc). If NO, YES explain and provide details. We confirm that to our best knowledge neither the project as a whole nor any parts of it are (nor will be) submitted for any other EU grant (including EU funding managed by authorities in EU Member States or other funding bodies, e.g. EU Regional Funds, EU Agricultural Funds, etc). If YES NO, explain and provide details. Financial support to third parties (if applicable) If in your project the maximum amount per third party will be more than the threshold amount set in the Call document, justify and explain why the higher amount is necessary in order to fulfil your project’s objectives. Project does not exceed the maximum amount of the threshold amount set in the Call document per third party. #§DEC-LAR-DL§# ANNEXES LIST OF ANNEXES Standard Detailed budget table (annex 1 to Part B) — mandatory CVs (annex 2 to Part B) — mandatory, if required in the Call document Annual activity reports (annex 3 to Part B) — mandatory, if required in the Call document List of previous projects (annex 4 to Part B) — mandatory, if required in the Call document Special Other annexes (annex X to Part B) — mandatory, if required in the Call document 83 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 HISTORY OF CHANGES PUBLICATION VERSION CHANGE DATE 1.0 15.04.2021 Initial version (new MFF). 2.0 01.06.2022 Consolidation, formatting and layout changes. Tags added. JA MENTOR, history of changes. Version Date Criterion/comment Change GA 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance Section 1.1 added a more detailed description of the project framework, project general objectives, as well as context analysis. In total goals/general objectives changed from 7 to 5. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance A re-definition of project goals/general objectives has been made to help with defining the focus of the project. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance In section 1.2 added a more detailed description of the need analysis on which the project objectives are based. Specific objectives updated, optimised and combined, changed from 9 to 7 in total. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance Re-definition of the specific objectives in line with the Call. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance In section 1.2 Table 1 a full update/rework has been done. Changed to show clear relation between the 7 specific objectives, the expected outcomes, KPIs, targets and measurements. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance In section 2.1 is added a more detailed description of the project approach and the methodology we intend to apply. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 1- Relevance An in-depth analysis has been done on sustainability, ethics and use/management of the data for the project. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.1- Quality – In section 2.4 A more detailed description of the Project Design and project structure and the process of WPs and tasks implementation coordination. Governance and organizational structure have been revised. Steering layer – 84 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Consortium Forum is indicated as the main tool for general project direction and guidance. MENTOR Executive board is added to the governance structure and indicated as the solution provider collaborating on executive decisions regarding project implementation in the Directing Layer. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.1- Quality – In section 2.5 project internal financial monitoring Project Design and activities have been postponed from 3 to 6 months. implementation 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.1- Quality – In section 2.7 introduction of an assessment of risk Project Design and likelihood, impact, preventive and corrective implementation measures. Addition of a new risk (conflicts among partners). 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.1- Quality – Milestones and deliverables have been revised, Project Design and added/deleted where necessary, all through WP1- implementation 6. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.1- Quality – WP5 – revision of description and tasks, added Project Design and sub-tasks for better structure and more implementation comprehensive approach with WP6 as well as to emphasize inclusion of vulnerable/marginalized target groups mentioned in the Call (refugees, elderly, displaced from Ukraine). Task 5.2.2 Implementation of Activa`t Best practice, moved from task 6.2 to fit the framework better. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.2 - Quality In section 2.3 for all the roles in the table – more Project Team and detailed expertise/profile information has been cooperation added. arrangements 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.2 - Quality In section 1.3 description of synergies with Project Team and additional European initiatives added. cooperation arrangements 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 2.2 - Quality Romanian team clarified the role of the banker Project Team and joining their team – as a project assistant in the cooperation project, he will help the project responsible. He arrangements volunteered due to lack of staff in the National Centre for Mental Health and the Fight Against Drugs and will support the Romanian project team. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion – 2.2 Quality External experts (e.g. WHO, OECD and EU JRC Project Team and experts) will also be considered and invited to join cooperation the Consortium Forum meetings to ensure a broad arrangements spectrum of field expertise and a wide range of stakeholder involvement. Added in section 2.4. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 3 – Impact In section 3.1 a more detailed description of project potential impacts with a focus on short, medium and long-term impacts pointed out separately. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 3 – Impact In section 3.2 updated description of the 3 Consortium Forum meetings, added information on 85 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 external communications activities and interaction with different stakeholders. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 3 – Impact Re-definition of project sustainability with a description of the relationship with external stakeholders (OECD, DG Sante, EU JRC, etc.), the enhancement of policy changes, the engagement and advocacy strategies, as well as the way in which the consortium can collaborate with other joint actions added in section 3.3. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 3 – Impact In T2.2 and T2.5 added a description of dissemination and communication activities tailored for specific target groups. 1.1 13.05.2024 Criterion 3 – Impact WP4 sustainability – Revision of description of the objectives. All the tasks in the WP have been revised, and detailed descriptions have been added. Previously planned deliverables have been summed up into one deliverable – Final sustainability report. Version Date Change Justification GA 1.1 13.05.2024 Removed 2 Denmark’s affiliated They withdrew from the project after entities (RMIDT and RH) in section their own initiative when the beneficiary 2.2. of Denmark (RSD) stepped down from leading WP6. Reasons given: mainly a lack of resources (both financial and personnel). 1.1 13.05.2024 Removed Malta from the They withdrew from the project after participants list in section 2.2. their own initiative – mainly due to lack of personnel and financial resources, as well as changes in the WP6 framework. 1.2 10.06.2024 Removed Spain`s affiliated entity They withdrew from the project after Junta Extremadura from the their own initiative – mainly due to lack participants list in section 2.2. of personnel and financial resources. The tasks in WP5 and WP6 will be performed by affiliated entity 17.8 (Fundesalud) - 1.62 PM in WP5 (+8389.65 EURO) and 0.706 PM in WP6 (+3656.23 EURO) will be allocated to it for the implementation thereof. 1.2 10.06.2024 Added Sevicio Extremeño de A written notification from the Spanish Salud (SES) as an associated beneficiary (Biosistemak). partner to the Mentor project. 1.1 13.05.2024 Adjustments made to Italian UNIMIBI joining as an affiliated entity partnership (UNIMIBI and and Lombardy Region – changing role 86 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 Lombardy Region) in the project in to associated partner after their own section 2.2. initiative. 1.2 10.06.2024 Updated status of one of the HDIR is withdrawing from the activity Norwegian participants (HDIR) - due to a recent reorganization of the expressed a need to change their health administration by the Norwegian role from an affiliated entity to an Government, which has reduced associated partner. HDIR’s capacity to participate in projects. Although HDIR cannot participate in task 6.1.1.2 to the originally planned extent, it will support NIPH with its expertise in implementing the task. HDIR's task will be taken over by the beneficiary "Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH)," with a budget of €28,137.58 (3 PMs) allocated for its implementation. 1.1 13.05.2024 Removed RPNC role of The person has left RPNC and the administrative lead from section project. 2.3 table. 1.1 13.05.2024 Change of name and leader of With Denmark (RSD) stepping down as WP6 coordinator. coordinators of WP6, Norway (NIPH) took over the role and Iceland (DOHI) became co-leaders of WP6. 1.1 13.05.2024 Clarified task 5.1 co-leader (PHAS, Based on information given by team Sweden). Sweden. 1.1 13.05.2024 Updates to Outside resources - Changes have been revised according section 2.3 to reflect the changes to the modifications made in WP5 and made in the project. WP6. 1.1 13.05.2024 In section 2.4 one of the Because of the changes in the Consortium Forum meeting leadership of WP6 and decreased destinations was moved from participation level from Denmark in the Denmark to Spain. project. 1.1 13.05.2024 In section 4.1 Iceland (DOHI) Denmark (RSD) stepping down as added as task 6.2 leaders and coordinators of WP6 and task 6.2 WP6 co-leaders. leaders. 1.1 13.05.2024 Description of WP1 task 1.1 Based on HaDEA revised, added information on recommendations. project management structure. MS2-MS8 updated, changed Consortium Forum online meetings to Online Feedback meetings (therefore only 4 Consortium Forum meetings in total are planned (annually, including the kick-off)). 1.1 13.05.2024 WP3 lead beneficiary name The name of the Spanish beneficiary update. was changed from Kronikgune to Biosistemak. 87 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 1.1 13.05.2024 WP6 revised objectives, tasks, Due to Denmark (RSD) stepping down deliverables and milestones as WP6 leaders and Norway (NIPH) emphasizing the needs of taking over leadership of WP6 and to vulnerable/marginalized target add a more overarching framework and groups mentioned in the Call interrelated scope with WP5. (refugees, older people, displaced from Ukraine). Task 6.2 was reworked (with previous sub-tasks 6.2.1 Pilot implementation of existing digital mental health interventions, 6.2.2 Identify relevant factors influencing the implementation processes of the pilot implemented interventions and 6.2.3 Development of guidelines for implementing digital mental health services in the wider EU deleted) and restructured into the new 6.2.1 Improve and adapt an online platform and guidelines for mental health promotion for municipalities, schools and workplaces, and 6.2.2 Adapting, evaluating and piloting a digital mental health tool for individual mental health promotion in the new WP6 framework. 1.1 13.05.2024 Changes made to S1.2 - this Due to Denmark (RSD) stepping down subcontracting activity was moved from WP6 coordinator role and changes to WP5 under task 5.2 allocating to the tasks made in WP6 under Norway additional funding to support the (NIPH) leadership. activity within the new task frame. 1.1 13.05.2024 Timetable updates. Tasks and Updates made to reflect the changes in deadlines. tasks and deadlines of the revised proposal, especially in WP6. 1.2 10.06.2024 Synergies with the Action grants on To focus on a few points that can prevention of NCDs in the area of complement each other, possibly build mental health. on the work, connect and make economies in terms of reach, geographical coverage, expertise, costs for communication etc. 88 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 JA MENTOR, Budget history of changes Budget reallocation (Sum of increase or Version Date Partner/country decrease Justification GA compared to the previous version of the budget), EURO Extra involvement added in Task 6.3 in WP6 with additional 3.88 PM (+ 16 1.1 13.05.2024 BCH, Hungary 16,191.24 191.24 EURO). Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Additional funding has been allocated for Biosistemak as one of the Consortium Forum meetings will be held in Spain (changed from Denmark) - the cost of other goods and services increased by 21 400 EURO. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence Biosistemak, 1.1 13.05.2024 19,690.14 costs due to change of meeting point Spain from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is - 1709.86 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement added in Task 6.1 and 6.2 in WP6 with additional 3.87 PM. (+ 38 697.41 EURO) and slight refinement of the salary rates. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of 1.1 13.05.2024 BZgA, Germany 40,483.24 meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1785.83 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement and participation in pilot added in WP6 tasks 6.1 and 6.2, additional 9 PM (+ 90 040.50 EURO). 1.1 13.05.2024 DOHI, Iceland 89,282.94 Decrease in travel and subsistence costs from 5.3. technical meeting in Italy and 5.4. technical meeting in Germany (-757.56 EURO). Financial resources 89 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 transferred from RSD (Denmark) and NUHI (Iceland). Sub-task 6.2 moved to WP5 under task 5.2 with adjusted framework, changes to PM by 2.554 (+12 738.73 EUR). Increased subcontracting cost by 11 1.1 13.05.2024 FFIS, Spain 28,138.81 622.98 EURO. Additional technical meetings in WP 5 (+ 3777.10 EURO). Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement added in WP6, FRCB-IDIBAPS / additional 3.12 PM (+ 16 692 EURO). 1.1 13.05.2024 16,692.00 HCB, Spain Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). FR-MOH (France) on their own initiative changed the PM from 13.88 to 13.46 PM in WP 5 (-4205.10 EURO). One additional person added to the WP5 technical meetings (+1887.48 EURO). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of 1.1 13.05.2024 FR-MOH, France -165.85 meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +2151.77 EURO. Financial resources transferred to PHC (Ukraine). Tasks and all financial resources transferred from JUNTA EXTREMADURA (Spain) to FUNDESALUD (Spain), adding 1.62 FUNDESALUD, PM in WP5 (+8389.65 EURO) and 1.2 10.06.2024 14,220.98 Spain 0.706 PM in WP6 (+3656.23 EURO). Extra involvement in WP6 tasks, additional 0.42 PM (+ 2175.10 EURO), financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Norwegian participants (HDIR) - expressed a need to change their role from an affiliated entity to an associated 1.2 10.06.2024 HDIR, Norway -35,171.97 partner. Tasks and all financial resources are transferred to NIPH with the addition of 3 PM. Extra involvement added in WP6 with additional 3.12 PM (+ 14021.28 EURO). 1.1 13.05.2024 IDIVAL, Spain 14,021.28 Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). On the partner's own initiative, a reallocation of personnel costs from 1.1 13.05.2024 ISS, Italy -4,220.08 WP1 - WP6 of 13,53 pm. (- 47070.80EURO). Other goods and services costs increased by + 40 950.40 90 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 EUR. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1900.32 EURO Will not participate and has withdrawn JUNTA from the project. Tasks and all financial 1.2 10.06.2024 EXTREMADURA, -9,870.79 resources are transferred to Spain FUNDESALUD (Spain). MFH (Malta) will not participate and has 1.1 13.05.2024 MFH, Malta -19,033.43 withdrawn from the project, budget moved to NIPH (Norway). Added 1,15 PM for pilot in WP5 (+ 5537.25 EUR). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and 1.1 13.05.2024 MOSA, Estonia 6,546.26 subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1009,01 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement in WP6, additional 20.75 PM (+ 57 970.73 EURO). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In NCMHFAD, 1.1 13.05.2024 62,327.77 addition to the travel and subsistence Romania costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 4357,04 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement and pilot added in WP6, additional 5.87 PM (+ 22 983,60 EURO). Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point 1.1 13.05.2024 NHF, Poland 25,461.72 from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 2478,12 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement in WP6 with 1.1 13.05.2024 NIJZ, Slovenia 15,056.44 additional 3.36 PM (+ 12 148.18 EURO) added. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night 91 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 2908,26 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Took over tasks and allocated financial resources from HDIR (Norway) to NIPH (Norway) with additional 3 PM in WP6 (+35 171.97 EURO). Refinement of the salary rates, taking on the leadership role of WP6 and involvement increased, additional 29,07 PM (+ 252 622.57 EURO) were added. Additional other goods and services + 12840 EUR. 1.2. 10.06.2024 NIPH, Norway 306,223.15 Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 5588,61 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark) and MFH (Malta). Reduced travel and subsistence costs due to absence from the WP5 Task 5.4 technical meeting in Italy. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence 1.1 13.05.2024 NNGYK, Hungary -1,590.02 costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is -1590.02 EURO. Financial resources transferred to OKFŐ (Hungary). Planned to participate in task 6.2 in previous work frame with Denmark leading WP6. After Denmark stepping down and change of task 6.2 with Norway leading WP6, NUHI will not participate in any tasks in WP6. 1.1 13.05.2024 NUHI, Iceland -48,870.11 Decrease of 5PM (- 50 022.50 EURO). Added travel and subsistence costs (+1152.39 EURO) for technical meeting to travel to Germany, will participate in task 5.3. Financial resources transferred to DOHI (Iceland). Extra involvement in WP6, additional 8.83 PM (+ 36 847.59 EURO) was added. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of 1.1 13.05.2024 OKFŐ, Hungary 39,014.34 meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 2166,75 EURO. Financial resources 92 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 transferred from RSD (Denmark) and NNGYK (Hungary). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence 1.1 13.05.2024 PHAS, Sweden 1,042.18 costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1042.18 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement in WP6, additional 17,89 PM (+ 51132.48 EURO) was added. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In 1.1 13.05.2024 PHC, Ukraine 51,532.66 addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is 400.18 EURO. Financial resources transferred from France (FR-MOH). Added travel and subsistence costs (+1259.39 EURO) for technical meeting 1.1 13.05.2024 PHCI, Iceland 1,259.39 to travel to Italy, will participate in task 5.4. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Changed role to associated partner after their own initiative. Associated Region partners, according to call participate 1.1 13.05.2024 -21,397.86 Lombardia, Italy without the right to get the grant money. Financial resources transferred to UNIMIBI (Italy). RH (Denmark) will not participate after 1.1 13.05.2024 RH, Denmark -1,954.89 their own initiative and has withdrawn from the project. Slight refinement of the salary rates and slight reallocation of PM in WP1 - WP6. Total change of PM + 0.61 (-4.70 EURO). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark RIVM, 1.1 13.05.2024 1,546.80 to Spain. In addition to the travel and Netherlands subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1551.50 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark) . RMIDT (Denmark) will not participate 1.1 13.05.2024 RMIDT, Denmark -112,601.66 after their own initiative and has withdrawn from the project. Financial 93 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 resources are transferred to RPNC (Latvia). Due to additional challenges in ensuring the continuity of the project based on the withdrawal of Denmark as WP6 leader and departure of administrative lead of the project, refinement of the salary rates and workload as well as extra involvement in WP6 tasks, additional (+ 161 771.59 EURO) was added. Decrease in other goods and services costs by - 55,91 EURO. Additional 1.1 13.05.2024 RPNC, Latvia 165,478.87 recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +3763.19 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark) and RMIDT(Denmark). RSD (Denmark) stepping down as coordinators of WP6 and task 6.2 leaders. PM reduced by 92.02 and personnel costs by 715 500.53 EURO. 1.1 13.05.2024 RSD, Denmark -795,531.18 Other goods and services were reduced by 74 900 EURO and travel and subsistence costs reduced by 5130.65 EURO. Funds were redistributed to other project partners. Added 1.15 PM for pilot in WP 5 (+ 3691.50 EURO). Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to SAM LT, 1.1 13.05.2024 4,700.51 the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid Lithuania day and night was added for Consortium Forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +1009,01 EURO. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement in WP6, additional 3.12 PM (+ 20 030.40 EURO) was 1.1 13.05.2024 SAS, Spain 20,030.40 added. Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Changed travel plans from Italy to Poland (+ 49.22 EURO). Financial 1.1 13.05.2024 SB, Germany 49.22 resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Extra involvement in WP6, additional SHSO-MHS, 1.1 13.05.2024 28,946.71 4.58 PM (+ 28 423.48 EURO) was Cyprus added. Additional recalculation of travel and subsistence costs due to change of 94 Call: EU4H-2023-JA-2-IBA — (DP-g-23-32-01) Direct grants to Member States’ authorities: ‘Healthier Together’ EU NCD initiative – Mental health Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 EU Grants: Application form (EU4H): V2.0 – 01.06.2022 meeting point from Denmark to Spain. In addition to the travel and subsistence costs, 1 paid day and night consortium forum meetings. Total change of travel and subsistence costs is +523.23 EURO, financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Their own initiative to not participate in any tasks in WP6, increased 1.1 13.05.2024 SMS, Spain 18,426.71 involvement in WP5 by 2.01 PM (+18426.71 EUR). Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Other goods and services costs increased by 14 256.15 EURO. 1.1 13.05.2024 SSB, Norway 14,256.15 Financial resources transferred from RSD (Denmark). Their own initiative to not participate in any tasks in WP6, decrease of 7.8 PM (- 62 453.76 EUR). Decresased travel 1.1 13.05.2024 THL, Finland -63,103.25 and subsistence costs (-649.49 EURO) will not participate in technical meetings in WP6 and task 5.2. Extra involvement in WP6, additional 0.28 PM. (+ 1498 EURO) and WP1 16.82 PM (+ 89 987 EURO). Financial 1.1 13.05.2024 ProMIS, Italy 91,485.00 resources transferred from RSD (Denmark) and ISS (Italy) and THL (Finland). Added as a new partner in WP 5. Personal costs added 20 062.50 EURO 1.1 13.05.2024 UNIMIBI, Italy 21,397.86 and other costs 1335.36 EURO. Financial resources transferred from Region Lombardia (Italy). New associated partner added. Associated partners, according to call 1.2 10.06.2024 SES, Spain 0.00 participate without the right to get the grant money. 95 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR ATTENTION! Delete columns that do not apply for your grant. CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PROJECT) PROJECT COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees D. Other cost C. Purchase costs A.2 + A.3 Natural categories B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs persons under direct A.4 SME owners costs D.1 Financial contract and seconded C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment support to third Total persons subsistence works and services parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 [+ c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 PARTICIPANT [SHSO-MHS) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 217 649,40 0,00 0,00 7 237,00 3 279,00 2 255,00 1 703,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 15 742,05 240 628,45 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NUHI) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 31 977,00 0,00 0,00 1 077,00 429,00 357,00 291,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 313,78 35 367,78 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT (PHCI) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 72 462,50 0,00 0,00 1 177,00 541,00 342,00 294,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 154,77 78 794,27 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [DOHI) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 441 320,00 0,00 0,00 10 419,00 5 014,00 3 082,00 2 323,00 0,00 135 000,00 0,00 41 071,73 627 810,73 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [RPNC] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 608 097,40 0,00 0,00 11 717,00 5 248,00 3 659,00 2 810,00 0,00 109 527,75 0,00 51 053,95 780 396,10 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SB] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 174 563,16 0,00 0,00 534,00 261,00 206,00 67,00 0,00 6 000,00 0,00 12 676,80 193 773,96 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [ULEI] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 80 000,00 0,00 0,00 431,00 261,00 105,00 65,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with5document 630,17 86 061,17 Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [MHB] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [BZgA] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 262 177,95 0,00 0,00 8 487,00 2 870,00 3 196,00 2 421,00 0,00 21 000,00 0,00 20 416,55 312 081,49 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [PHC] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 131 798,91 0,00 0,00 12 233,99 4 017,00 4 162,00 4 055,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10 082,30 154 115,20 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SAS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 70 740,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 4 951,80 75 691,80 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SMS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 55 597,50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 3 891,83 59 489,33 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [GENCAT] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 37 435,61 0,00 5 000,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 970,49 45 406,10 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [ICO] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 25 740,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 801,80 27 541,80 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [IDIVAL] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 41 670,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 916,90 44 586,90 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SES] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [FRCB-IDIBAPS / HCB] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 35 633,60 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 494,35 38 127,95 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [FUNDESALUD] Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 29 485,28 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 063,97 31 549,25 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [FFIS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 36 342,00 0,00 43 449,60 3 530,00 1 455,00 1 185,00 890,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 832,51 89 154,11 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [Biosistemak] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 155 408,00 0,00 0,00 8 718,00 3 683,00 2 851,00 2 184,00 0,00 25 000,00 0,00 13 238,82 202 364,82 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NIJZ] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 321 973,44 0,00 10 000,00 15 804,00 5 985,00 5 811,00 4 008,00 0,00 13 000,00 0,00 25 254,42 386 031,86 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [PHAS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 154 194,00 0,00 0,00 3 941,00 1 723,00 1 257,00 961,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 11 069,45 169 204,45 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NIPH] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 591 778,00 0,00 0,00 13 365,00 5 430,00 4 692,00 3 243,00 0,00 12 000,00 0,00 43 200,01 660 343,01 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SSB] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 111 115,40 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 29 071,52 0,00 9 813,08 150 000,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [HDIR] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NCMHFAD] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 86 626,25 0,00 0,00 6 124,00 2 190,00 2 236,00 1 698,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 492,52 99 242,77 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [ProMIS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 94 500,00 0,00 0,00 5 376,00 1 650,00 2 142,00 1 584,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 991,32 106 867,32 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [UNIMIBI] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 18 750,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 248,00 0,00 1 399,86 21 397,86 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [Region Lombardia] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [ASL Turin] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 13 472,00 0,00 0,00 869,00 221,00 357,00 291,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 003,87 15 344,87 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [ISS] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 576 750,00 0,00 0,00 14 974,00 5 412,00 5 510,00 4 052,00 0,00 69 271,40 0,00 46 269,68 707 265,08 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [DISA] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [BCH] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 91 582,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 410,74 97 992,74 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NNGYK] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 74 060,00 0,00 0,00 5 536,00 2 454,00 1 318,00 1 764,00 0,00 1 000,00 0,00 5 641,72 86 237,72 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [OKFŐ] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 545 067,00 0,00 0,00 21 047,00 8 456,00 7 496,00 5 095,00 0,00 18 700,00 0,00 40 936,98 625 750,98 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [RSD] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 68 000,00 0,00 0,00 4 302,00 1 499,00 1 583,00 1 220,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 061,14 77 363,14 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [RIVM] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 168 208,06 0,00 0,00 6 632,00 2 442,00 2 368,00 1 822,00 0,00 6 500,00 0,00 12 693,80 194 033,86 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [Trimbos] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 80 268,47 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 618,79 85 887,26 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [NHF] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 259 280,00 0,00 0,00 9 196,00 3 587,00 3 453,00 2 156,00 0,00 94 200,00 0,00 25document Associated with 387,32 388 063,32 Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [SAM LT] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 39 150,00 0,00 0,00 3 680,00 1 462,00 1 257,00 961,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 998,10 45 828,10 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [MOSA] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 111 465,00 0,00 0,00 5 445,00 2 072,00 1 929,00 1 444,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 183,70 125 093,70 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [THL] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 202 600,80 0,00 0,00 5 123,00 2 257,00 1 614,00 1 252,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 14 540,67 222 264,47 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) PARTICIPANT [FR-MOH] TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 97 810,00 0,00 0,00 7 580,00 2 964,00 2 682,00 1 934,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 7 377,30 112 767,30 (Proposal Step) TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 (Grant Preparation Step) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SHSO-MHS Participant PIC: 891074787 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 4 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 3 6 WP6 3 a Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 09.05.2024 20:41 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SHSO-MHS Participant PIC: 891074787 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and Description of project role/activities/responsibilities to be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) which WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 1,00 7 430,00 Yes, WP1-WP6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 7 430,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 7 430,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 0,40 2 972,00 Yes, WP1-WP6 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 2 972,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 2 972,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 1,00 7 430,00 YES, WP 1-6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 7 430,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 7 430,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 0,50 3 715,00 Yes, WP 1-6 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 3 715,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 3 715,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 2,88 21 398,40 No Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 5 800,00 14,40 83 520,00 No Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 104 918,40 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 104 918,40 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 7 430,00 2,00 14 860,00 Yes, WP1-6 Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 5 800,00 5,20 30 160,00 Yes, WP1-6 Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 7 000,00 1,20 8 400,00 Yes, WP1-6 Junior researcher Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 3 500,00 1,20 4 200,00 Yes, WP1-6 Administrative personell/financial Administrative personnel monthly 3 500,00 2,00 7 000,00 Yes, WP1-6 Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 5 800,00 4,58 26 564,00 Yes, WP1-6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 91 184,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 91 184,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 217 649,40 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; subsistence costs/daily allowances) Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel Associated and with participants document whose costs are - 15/07/2024 Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 Kick off meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Latvia Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 2 hotel nights in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 2,00 190,00 1 person, 2 days in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 2,00 146,00 Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 190,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 146,00 Total travel 877,00 2 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Spain Travel costs 0,00 429,00 1,00 429,00 1 person, 2 hotel nights in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 2,00 234,00 1 person, 2 days in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 2,00 176,00 Total travel costs for this travel 429,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 234,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 176,00 Total travel 839,00 3 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 369,00 1,00 369,00 1 person 2 hotel nights in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 2,00 228,00 1 person, 2 days in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 2,00 196,00 Total travel costs for this travel 369,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 228,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 196,00 Total travel 793,00 4 Final project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Poland Travel costs 0,00 429,00 1,00 429,00 1 person 2 hotel nights in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 2,00 206,00 1 person, 2 days in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 2,00 134,00 Total travel costs for this travel 429,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 206,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 134,00 Total travel 769,00 Total travel costs for this WP 1 768,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 858,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 652,00 Total travel for this WP 3 278,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 1 WP 5.1.technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to the Netherlands Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in the Netherlands Accommodation costs 0,00 133,00 3,00 399,00 1 persons, 3 days in the Netherlands Subsistence costs 0,00 103,00 3,00 309,00 Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 399,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 309,00 Total travel 1 249,00 2 WP 5.2. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Hungary Travel costs 0,00 429,00 1,00 429,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Hungary Accommodation costs 0,00 105,00 3,00 315,00 1 person, 3 days in Hungary Subsistence costs 0,00 64,00 3,00 192,00 Total travel costs for this travel 429,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 315,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 192,00 Total travel 936,00 3 WP 5.3. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Germany Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Germany Accommodation costs 0,00 119,00 3,00 357,00 1 person, 3 days in Germany Subsistence costs 0,00 97,00 3,00 291,00 Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 357,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 291,00 Total travel 1 189,00 Total travel costs for this WP 1 511,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 1 071,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 792,00 Total travel for this WP 3 374,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP 1 kick off meeting Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 1,00 95,00 1 person, 1 day in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 1,00 73,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 95,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 73,00 Total travel 168,00 2 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the 2 Project meeting Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 1,00 117,00 1 persos, 1 day in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 1,00 88,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this travel 117,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 88,00 Total travel 205,00 3 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the 3 Project meeting Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person 1 hotel night in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 1,00 114,00 1 person, 1 day in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 1,00 98,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 114,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 98,00 Total travel 212,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 326,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 259,00 Total travel for this WP 585,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 3 279,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 2 255,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 1 703,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 7 237,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or allocated to the action less if used also (EUR) needed WP 60 month) for other a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the action (100% or Also part of other work Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action less if used also packages? YES/NO and which (EUR) needed for other WP purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 0,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 7 237,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 224 886,40 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 15 742,05 Total indirect costs 15 742,05 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 240 628,45 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 240 628,45 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 192 502,76 Requested EU contribution 192 502,75 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 192 502,75 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 48 125,70 OWN RESOURCES 48 125,70 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 240 628,45 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SHSO-MHS Participant PIC: 891074787 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 7 430,00 0,00 0,00 3 278,00 1 768,00 858,00 652,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 10 708,00 WP2 WP2 2 972,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 972,00 WP3 WP3 7 430,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 7 430,00 WP4 WP4 3 715,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 3 715,00 WP5 WP5 104 918,40 0,00 0,00 3 374,00 1 511,00 1 071,00 792,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 108 292,40 WP6 WP6 91 184,00 0,00 0,00 585,00 0,00 326,00 259,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 91 769,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 217 649,40 0,00 0,00 7 237,00 3 279,00 2 255,00 1 703,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 15 742,05 240 628,45 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: NUHI Participant PIC: 999821390 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 0 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 1 6 WP6 0 a Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 09.05.2024 21:01 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: NUHI Participant PIC: 999821390 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities to be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 3,42 31 977,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 31 977,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 31 977,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 31 977,00 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 5.3 Technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person travel to Germany Travel costs 0,00 429,00 1,00 429,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Germany Accommodation costs 0,00 119,00 3,00 357,00 1 person, 3 days in Germany Subsistence costs 0,00 97,00 3,00 291,00 Total travel costs for this travel 429,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 357,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 291,00 Total travel 1 077,00 Total travel costs for this WP 429,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this WP 357,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 291,00 Total travel for this WP 1 077,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 429,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 357,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 291,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 1 077,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is packages? YES/NO and which needed WP Rate of use for the Also part of other work Associated with documentfor Ref.which Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 0,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 1 077,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 33 054,00 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 2 313,78 Total indirect costs 2 313,78 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 35 367,78 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 35 367,78 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 28 294,22 Requested EU contribution 28 294,21 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 28 294,21 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 7 073,57 OWN RESOURCES 7 073,57 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 35 367,78 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: NUHI Participant PIC: 999821390 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP2 WP2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP3 WP3 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP4 WP4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP5 WP5 31 977,00 0,00 0,00 1 077,00 429,00 357,00 291,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 33 054,00 WP6 WP6 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 31 977,00 0,00 0,00 1 077,00 429,00 357,00 291,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 313,78 35 367,78 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: PHCI Participant PIC: 917819724 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 0 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 1 6 WP6 0 a Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 09.05.2024 21:10 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: PHCI Participant PIC: 917819724 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities to be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 4,75 44 412,50 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 44 412,50 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 44 412,50 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 3,00 28 050,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 28 050,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 28 050,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 72 462,50 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 5.4 Technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 3,00 342,00 1 person, 3 days in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 3,00 294,00 Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 342,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 294,00 Total travel 1 177,00 Total travel costs for this WP 541,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this WP 342,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 294,00 Total travel for this WP 1 177,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 541,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 342,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 294,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 1 177,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is packages? YES/NO and which needed WP Rate of use for the Also part of other work Associated with documentfor Ref.which Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 0,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 1 177,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 73 639,50 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 5 154,77 Total indirect costs 5 154,77 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 78 794,27 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 78 794,27 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 63 035,41 Requested EU contribution 63 035,40 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 63 035,40 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 15 758,86 OWN RESOURCES 15 758,86 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 78 794,27 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: PHCI Participant PIC: 917819724 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP2 WP2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP3 WP3 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP4 WP4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP5 WP5 44 412,50 0,00 0,00 1 177,00 541,00 342,00 294,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 45 589,50 WP6 WP6 28 050,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 28 050,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 72 462,50 0,00 0,00 1 177,00 541,00 342,00 294,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 154,77 78 794,27 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: DOHI Participant PIC: 955430213 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 4 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 2 6 WP6 3 a Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 09.05.2024 21:33 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: DOHI Participant PIC: 955430213 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities to be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 1,00 9 350,00 Yes, WP 1, WP2, WP3, WP4 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 9 350,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 9 350,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 1,00 9 350,00 Yes, WP 1, WP2, WP3, WP4 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 9 350,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 9 350,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 2,00 18 700,00 Yes, WP 1, WP2, WP3, WP4 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 18 700,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 18 700,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 9 350,00 2,00 18 700,00 Yes, WP 1, WP2, WP3, WP4 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total employees (or equivalent) 18 700,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 18 700,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 9 350,00 14,20 132 770,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 132 770,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 132 770,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 9 350,00 9,00 84 150,00 Project managers monthly 9 350,00 9,00 84 150,00 Project managers monthly 9 350,00 9,00 84 150,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 252 450,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 252 450,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 441 320,00 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 Kick off meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Latvia Travel costs 0,00 429,00 2,00 858,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 4,00 380,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 4,00 292,00 Total travel costs for this travel 858,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 380,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 292,00 Total travel 1 530,00 2 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Spain Travel costs 0,00 541,00 2,00 1 082,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 4,00 468,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 4,00 352,00 Total travel costs for this travel 1 082,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 468,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 352,00 Total travel 1 902,00 3 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 541,00 2,00 1 082,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 4,00 456,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 4,00 392,00 Total travel costs for this travel 1 082,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 456,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 392,00 Total travel 1 930,00 4 Final project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Poland Travel costs 0,00 541,00 2,00 1 082,00 2 persons 2 hotel nights in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 4,00 412,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 4,00 268,00 Total travel costs for this travel 1 082,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 412,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 268,00 Total travel 1 762,00 Total travel costs for this WP 4 104,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 1 716,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 1 304,00 Total travel for this WP 7 124,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 WP 5.1.technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to The Netherlands Travel costs 0,00 369,00 1,00 369,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in The Netherlands Accommodation costs 0,00 133,00 3,00 399,00 1 person, 3 days in The Netherlands Subsistence costs 0,00 103,00 3,00 309,00 Total travel costs for this travel 369,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 399,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 309,00 Total travel 1 077,00 2 WP 5.2. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Hungary Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Hungary Accommodation costs 0,00 105,00 3,00 315,00 1 person, 3 days in Hungary Subsistence costs 0,00 64,00 3,00 192,00 Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 315,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 192,00 Total travel 1 048,00 Total travel costs for this WP 910,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this WP 714,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 501,00 Total travel for this WP 2 125,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons, 1 hotel night each in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 2,00 190,00 2 persons, 1 day each in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 2,00 146,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 190,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 146,00 Total travel 336,00 2 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons, 1 hotel night each in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 2,00 234,00 2 persons, 1 day each in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 2,00 176,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 234,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 176,00 Total travel 410,00 3 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons, 1 hotel night each in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 2,00 228,00 2 persons, 1 day each in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 2,00 196,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 228,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 196,00 Total travel 424,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 652,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 518,00 Total travel for this WP 1 170,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 5 014,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 3 082,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 2 323,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 10 419,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 Audit fees for each partner (EU contribution > 3 Audit fees (CFS) 5 000,00 325.000,00 €) 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 5 000,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are document Associated with needed; Ref. types of goods services Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 Programming, installation and design. IT tools costs 130 000,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 130 000,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 135 000,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 145 419,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? recipients; maximum amount per recipient) (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 586 739,00 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 41 071,73 Total indirect costs 41 071,73 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 627 810,73 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 (EUR) Total costs 627 810,73 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 502 248,58 Requested EU contribution 502 248,57 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 502 248,57 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 125 562,16 OWN RESOURCES 125 562,16 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 627 810,73 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: DOHI Participant PIC: 955430213 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 9 350,00 0,00 0,00 7 124,00 4 104,00 1 716,00 1 304,00 0,00 5 000,00 0,00 21 474,00 WP2 WP2 9 350,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 9 350,00 WP3 WP3 18 700,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 18 700,00 WP4 WP4 18 700,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 18 700,00 WP5 WP5 132 770,00 0,00 0,00 2 125,00 910,00 714,00 501,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 134 895,00 WP6 WP6 252 450,00 0,00 0,00 1 170,00 0,00 652,00 518,00 0,00 130 000,00 0,00 383 620,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 441 320,00 0,00 0,00 10 419,00 5 014,00 3 082,00 2 323,00 0,00 135 000,00 0,00 41 071,73 627 810,73 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: RPNC Participant PIC: 881163036 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 3 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 2 6 WP6 2 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 13.05.2024 11:18 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: RPNC Participant PIC: 881163036 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) monthly 0,00 Project manager Project managers monthly 5 425,00 21,60 117 180,00 Yes. ALL WP Project manager assistant Administrative personnel monthly 2 622,00 21,60 56 635,20 Yes. ALL WP Finance officer Administrative personnel monthly 5 883,00 18,00 105 894,00 Yes. ALL WP Finance coordinator Administrative personnel monthly 4 326,00 18,00 77 868,00 Yes. ALL WP Financial accounting specialist Administrative personnel monthly 2 350,00 7,20 16 920,00 Yes. ALL WP Legal officer Administrative personnel monthly 3 621,00 7,20 26 071,20 Yes. Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 450,00 10,80 48 060,00 Yes. Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 3 700,00 9,00 33 300,00 Yes. Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 481 928,40 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 481 928,40 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 3 700,00 1,00 3 700,00 Yes. Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 3 700,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 3 700,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 3 700,00 2,70 9 990,00 YES Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 450,00 2,70 12 015,00 YES Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 22 005,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 22 005,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 450,00 2,00 8 900,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 8 900,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 8 900,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Senior expert Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 450,00 3,12 13 884,00 Researcher Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 3 000,00 10,56 31 680,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 45 564,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 45 564,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 000,00 11,50 46 000,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 46 000,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 46 000,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 608 097,40 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 3 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 4 persons, travel in Italy Travel costs 0,00 369,00 4,00 1 476,00 4 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 8,00 912,00 4 persons, 2 days each in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 8,00 784,00 Total travel costs for this travel 1 476,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 912,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 784,00 Total travel 3 172,00 2 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 4 persons, travel in Spain Travel costs 0,00 541,00 4,00 2 164,00 4 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 8,00 936,00 4 persons, 2 days each in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 8,00 704,00 Total travel costs for this travel 2 164,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 936,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 704,00 Total travel 3 804,00 3 Final project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 4 persons, travel in Poland Travel costs 0,00 261,00 4,00 1 044,00 4 persons. 2 hotel nights each in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 8,00 824,00 4 persons, 2 days each in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 8,00 536,00 Total travel costs for this travel 1 044,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 824,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 536,00 Total travel 2 404,00 Total travel costs for this WP 4 684,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 2 672,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 2 024,00 Total travel for this WP 9 380,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 WP 5.1.technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel in Netherlands Travel costs 0,00 288,00 1,00 288,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Netherlands Accommodation costs 0,00 133,00 3,00 399,00 1 person, 3 days in Netherlands Subsistence costs 0,00 103,00 3,00 309,00 Total travel costs for this travel 288,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this travel 399,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 309,00 Total travel 996,00 2 WP 5.3. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel in Germany Travel costs 0,00 276,00 1,00 276,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Germany Accommodation costs 0,00 119,00 3,00 357,00 1 person, 3 days in Germany Subsistence costs 0,00 97,00 3,00 291,00 Total travel costs for this travel 276,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 357,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 291,00 Total travel 924,00 Total travel costs for this WP 564,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 756,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 600,00 Total travel for this WP 1 920,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Technical meeting in Spain Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flights costs are included in WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 1,00 117,00 1 person, 1 day in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 1,00 88,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 117,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 88,00 Total travel 205,00 Technical meeting in Italy Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flights costs are included in WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 1,00 114,00 1 person, 1 day in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 1,00 98,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 114,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 98,00 Total travel 212,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 231,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 186,00 Total travel for this WP 417,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 5 248,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 3 659,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 2 810,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 11 717,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 947,75 Consortium forum on-site event in Latvia Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 70 100,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 Audit fees for each partner (EU contribution > 3 Audit fees (CFS) 5 000,00 325.000,00 €) 4 Project evaluation 0,00 YES. ALL 30 persons 36 month Microsoft Team licenses costs 19 440,00 YES. ALL 30 persons 36 month Project managment tool (grantpro) costs 14 040,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 109 527,75 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 109 527,75 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 121 244,75 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 729 342,15 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 51 053,95 Total indirect costs 51 053,95 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 780 396,10 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 780 396,10 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 624 316,88 Requested EU contribution 624 316,87 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 624 316,87 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 156 079,23 OWN RESOURCES 156 079,23 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 780 396,10 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: RPNC Participant PIC: 881163036 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 481 928,40 0,00 0,00 9 380,00 4 684,00 2 672,00 2 024,00 0,00 109 527,75 0,00 600 836,15 WP2 WP2 3 700,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 3 700,00 WP3 WP3 22 005,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 22 005,00 WP4 WP4 8 900,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 900,00 WP5 WP5 45 564,00 0,00 0,00 1 920,00 564,00 756,00 600,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 47 484,00 WP6 WP6 46 000,00 0,00 0,00 417,00 0,00 231,00 186,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 46 417,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 608 097,40 0,00 0,00 11 717,00 5 248,00 3 659,00 2 810,00 0,00 109 527,75 0,00 51 053,95 780 396,10 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SB Participant PIC: 998928796 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 1 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 0 6 WP6 0 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 10.05.2024 06:22 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SB Participant PIC: 998928796 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 6 917,00 1,00 6 917,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 6 917,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 6 917,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 6 917,00 6,48 44 822,16 Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 9 506,00 12,92 122 824,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 167 646,16 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 167 646,16 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 174 563,16 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Project final meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person travel to Poland Travel costs 0,00 261,00 1,00 261,00 1 person 2 hotel nights in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 2,00 206,00 1 person 1 day in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 1,00 67,00 Total travel costs for this travel 261,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 206,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 67,00 Total travel 534,00 Total travel costs for this WP 261,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 206,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 67,00 Total travel for this WP 534,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 261,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 206,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 67,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 534,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is packages? YES/NO and which Associated with document needed Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 WP a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much No Translation costs for materials, that will be provided in Consumables 6 000,00 different European countries for PLE Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 6 000,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 6 000,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 6 534,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 181 097,16 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 12 676,80 Total indirect costs 12 676,80 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 193 773,96 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 193 773,96 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 155 019,17 Requested EU contribution 155 019,16 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 155 019,16 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Own resources 38 754,80 OWN RESOURCES 38 754,80 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 193 773,96 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: SB Participant PIC: 998928796 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 0,00 0,00 0,00 534,00 261,00 206,00 67,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 534,00 WP2 WP2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP3 WP3 6 917,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 917,00 WP4 WP4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP5 WP5 167 646,16 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 6 000,00 0,00 173 646,16 WP6 WP6 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 174 563,16 0,00 0,00 534,00 261,00 206,00 67,00 0,00 6 000,00 0,00 12 676,80 193 773,96 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: ULEI Participant PIC: 999854564 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 0 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 1 6 WP6 0 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 10.05.2024 06:28 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: ULEI Participant PIC: 999854564 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Stakeholder/advocat recruitment, responsible for workshop conceptualization and organization, providing support to the NGO "Irrsinnig Menschlich", providing Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 6 675,00 11,99 80 000,00 No scientific input into the process of media guide adaptation, performing data management, data analysis (e.g., qualitative media content analyses, evaluating the advocay strategy (Pre-Post-Comparison), developing reports, research reports) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 80 000,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 80 000,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 80 000,00 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 5.2 Technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person travel to Hungary Travel costs 0,00 261,00 1,00 261,00 1 person 1 hotel night in Hungary Accommodation costs 0,00 105,00 1,00 105,00 1 person 1 day in Hungary Subsistence costs 0,00 65,00 1,00 65,00 Total travel costs for this travel 261,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 105,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 65,00 Total travel 431,00 Total travel costs for this WP 261,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 105,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 65,00 Total travel for this WP 431,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 261,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 105,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 65,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 431,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 0,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 431,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 80 431,00 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 5 630,17 Total indirect costs 5 630,17 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 86 061,17 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 86 061,17 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 68 848,94 Requested EU contribution 68 848,93 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 68 848,93 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 17 212,24 OWN RESOURCES 17 212,24 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 86 061,17 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: ULEI Participant PIC: 999854564 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP2 WP2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP3 WP3 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP4 WP4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP5 WP5 80 000,00 0,00 0,00 431,00 261,00 105,00 65,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 80 431,00 WP6 WP6 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 80 000,00 0,00 0,00 431,00 261,00 105,00 65,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 5 630,17 86 061,17 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: MHB Participant PIC: 898913260 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 0 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 0 6 WP6 0 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 28.10.2023 21:54 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: MHB Participant PIC: 898913260 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 0,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 0,00 Total personnel (all WPs) 0,00 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Task 5.3 Meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 0,00 Total travel 0,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 0,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 0,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 0,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 0,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 0,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 0,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 0,00 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 0,00 Total indirect costs 0,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 0,00 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 0,00 Requested EU contribution 0,00 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 0,00 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Own resources 0,00 OWN RESOURCES 0,00 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: MHB Participant PIC: 898913260 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP2 WP2 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP3 WP3 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP4 WP4 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP5 WP5 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 WP6 WP6 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: BZgA Participant PIC: 998190723 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 4 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 3 6 WP6 3 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 10.05.2024 06:49 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: BZgA Participant PIC: 998190723 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Projectmanager, coordination task Project managers monthly 8 069,00 1,00 8 069,00 YES. WP1-WP6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 8 069,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 8 069,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 8 069,00 1,00 8 069,00 YES. WP1-WP6 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 8 069,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 8 069,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 8 069,00 1,00 8 069,00 YES. WP1-WP6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 8 069,00 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 8 069,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project managers monthly 8 069,00 1,50 12 103,50 YES. WP1-WP6 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 12 103,50 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 12 103,50 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Project managers monthly 8 069,00 2,88 23 238,72 No Technical Staff Technical personnel monthly 8 069,00 6,84 55 191,96 No Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 78 430,68 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 78 430,68 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Participation in all tasks of WP 6 Project managers monthly 8 069,00 11,07 89 339,97 YES. WP1-WP6 Adminstration includes controlling, contracting Administrative personnel monthly 8 069,00 7,20 58 096,80 YES. WP5-WP6 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 147 436,77 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 147 436,77 Total personnel (all WPs) 262 177,95 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 Kick off meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Latvia Travel costs 0,00 276,00 2,00 552,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 4,00 380,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 4,00 292,00 Total travel costs for this travel 552,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 380,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 292,00 Total travel 1 224,00 2 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Spain Travel costs 0,00 369,00 2,00 738,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 4,00 468,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 4,00 352,00 Total travel costs for this travel 738,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 468,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 352,00 Total travel 1 558,00 3 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 276,00 2,00 552,00 2 persons, 2 hotel nights each in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 4,00 456,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 4,00 392,00 Total travel costs for this travel 552,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 456,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 392,00 Total travel 1 400,00 4 Final project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 2 persons, travel to Poland Travel costs 0,00 261,00 2,00 522,00 2 persons 2 hotel nights in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 4,00 412,00 2 persons, 2 days each in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 4,00 268,00 Total travel costs for this travel 522,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 412,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 268,00 Total travel 1 202,00 Total travel costs for this WP 2 364,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 1 716,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 1 304,00 Total travel for this WP 5 384,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 WP 5.1.technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to the Netherlands Travel costs 0,00 245,00 1,00 245,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in the Netherlands Accommodation costs 0,00 133,00 3,00 399,00 1 person, 3 days in the Netherlands Subsistence costs 0,00 103,00 3,00 309,00 Total travel costs for this travel 245,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 399,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 309,00 Total travel 953,00 2 WP 5.2. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Hungary Travel costs 0,00 261,00 1,00 261,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Hungary Accommodation costs 0,00 105,00 3,00 315,00 1 person, 3 days in Hungary Subsistence costs 0,00 64,00 3,00 192,00 Total travel costs for this travel 261,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 315,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 192,00 Total travel 768,00 3 WP 5.4. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP 1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel nights in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 1,00 114,00 1 person, 1 days in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 1,00 98,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 114,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 98,00 Total travel 212,00 Total travel costs for this WP 506,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 828,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 599,00 Total travel for this WP 1 933,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 1 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP 1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons, 1 hotel night in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 2,00 190,00 2 persons, 1 day in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 2,00 146,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 190,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 146,00 Total travel 336,00 2 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP 1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons, 1 hotel night in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 2,00 234,00 2 persons, 1 day in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 2,00 176,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 234,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 176,00 Total travel 410,00 3 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP 1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 2 persons 1 hotel night in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 2,00 228,00 2 person, 1 day in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 2,00 196,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 228,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 196,00 Total travel 424,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 652,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 518,00 Total travel for this WP 1 170,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 2 870,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 3 196,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 2 421,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 8 487,00 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 Total equipment (all WPs) 0,00 C.3 Other goods, works and services WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events Information & publications 0,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 [5 short name other] 0,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Costs Also part of other work Description of tasks/activities for which the (actual costs) packages? YES/NO and which goods/services are needed; types of goods services WP needed; how much Consumables 0,00 Conferences, seminars, workshops, trainings & events 0,00 Translations Information & publications 6 000,00 Other expenses 1 IPR costs 0,00 2 Bank fees (pre-financing guarantee) 0,00 3 Audit fees (CFS) 0,00 4 Project evaluation 0,00 Programming Programming costs 15 000,00 [6 short name other] 0,00 Total goods, works and services for this WP 21 000,00 Total goods, works and services (all WPs) 21 000,00 Total purchase costs (all WPs) 29 487,00 D. Other cost categories D.1. Financial support to third parties WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 Also used for other work Costs Description of support scheme (estimated number of Financial support to third parties packages? (actual costs) recipients; maximum amount per recipient) YES/NO and which WP [Support scheme short name] 0,00 [Support scheme short name] 0,00 0,00 Total other cost category D.1 for this WP 0,00 Total D.1 (all WPs) 0,00 Total other cost categories (all WPs) 0,00 E. Indirect costs Costs (flat-rate) Total estimated direct costs (on which indirect cost flat-rate is based, 291 664,95 see GA eligibility article) ALL WORK PACKAGES Flat-rate (%) 7% ATTENTION! Check that the rate is in line with the call conditions. Put 0% if you receive an EU Operating Grant and are not eligible to charge indirect costs” Total indirect costs 20 416,55 Total indirect costs 20 416,55 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 312 081,49 PROJECT INCOME EU CONTRIBUTION (GRANT) Amount (EUR) Total costs 312 081,49 Single Funding rate (%) 80% ATTENTION! Enter funding rate from the call conditions. Maximum EU contribution 249 665,20 Requested EU contribution 249 665,19 ATTENTION❗ In order to avoid rounding issues, please request 1 cent less than the maximum EU contribution. EU CONTRIBUTION 249 665,19 REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES Revenues Income generated by the action Amount Description of the income (type of generated income and (EUR) number of users, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated income generated by the action 0,00 Total income generated by the action 0,00 Revenues 0,00 In-kind contributions by third parties In-kind contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated in-kind contributions by third parties 0,00 Total in-kind contributions 0,00 In-kind contributions 0,00 Financial contributions by third parties Financial contributions by third parties Amount Description of the contribution (type of contribution, (EUR) donor, purpose, etc) ALL WORK PACKAGES Estimated financial contributions by third parties 0,00 Total financial contributions 0,00 Financial contributions 0,00 TOTAL REVENUES AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY THIRD PARTIES 0,00 OWN RESOURCES Amount (EUR) Own resources 62 416,31 OWN RESOURCES 62 416,31 TOTAL INCOME PARTICIPANT 312 081,49 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: BZgA Participant PIC: 998190723 CONSOLIDATED COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE (PER PARTICIPANT) COSTS PER WORK PACKAGE A.1 Employees C. Purchase costs D. Other cost categories A.2 + A.3 Natural persons B. Subcontracting E. Indirect costs under direct contract and A.4 SME owners costs Total seconded persons C.1 Travel and C.3 Other goods, D.1 Financial support to C.1 Travel C.1 Accommodation C.1 Subsistence C.2 Equipment subsistence work and services third parties e = flat-rate * (a1 + a2 + a3 + a5 + b [+ a1 - a2 a3 b c1 c1a c1b c1c c2 c3 d1 c1] + [c1a + c1b + c1c] + c2 + c3 + d1 + d2 + d3 + d4 + d5 + d6) WP1 WP1 8 069,00 0,00 0,00 5 384,00 2 364,00 1 716,00 1 304,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 13 453,00 WP2 WP2 8 069,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 069,00 WP3 WP3 8 069,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 8 069,00 WP4 WP4 12 103,50 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 12 103,50 WP5 WP5 78 430,68 0,00 0,00 1 933,00 506,00 828,00 599,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 80 363,68 WP6 WP6 147 436,77 0,00 0,00 1 170,00 0,00 652,00 518,00 0,00 21 000,00 0,00 169 606,77 TOTAL COSTS PARTICIPANT 262 177,95 0,00 0,00 8 487,00 2 870,00 3 196,00 2 421,00 0,00 21 000,00 0,00 20 416,55 312 081,49 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 START (DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (AG) — PROPOSAL/GRANT PREPARATION) PROJECT DATA Project number: 101162928 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: PHC Participant PIC: 906650465 WORK PACKAGES & TRAVELS Index Name Description Number of travels Delete 1 WP1 4 2 WP2 0 3 WP3 0 4 WP4 0 5 WP5 4 6 WP6 3 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 a DETAILED BUDGET TABLE (ACTION GRANTS) Project number: 101162928 10.05.2024 07:30 Project acronym: MENTOR Participant short name: PHC Participant PIC: 906650465 ATTENTION: This table should be filled out one per participant (beneficiary, affiliated entity) ATTENTION: This table may ONLY contain eligible costs (i.e. costs that comply with the eligibility rules of the grant agreement that is part of your call documents). At proposal stage and during grant preparation, it should contain estimated costs/income. Costs must be estimated in EUR. ATTENTION! List each budgeted cost item ONLY once in this table, for the main WP. ATTENTION! White cells mean that you are required to enter data. Blue cells are calculated automatically. ACTION GRANT BUDGET TABLE (PER PARTICIPANT) PROJECT COSTS A. Personnel costs Costs (actual or unit costs) Time Rate Total Also working for other work ! monthly rates allowed for budgeting because simpler to establish the approximate costs; cost reporting will have to (months/other of work on Type of rate (amount) (EUR) packages? YES/NO and which Description of project role/activities/responsibilities be done according to MGA (usually daily rates) the action) (monthly/other) WP a b c=a*b WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) YES, WP 1, WP 2, WP4, WP5, Project coordinator Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 1 728,38 0,50 864,19 WP6 YES, WP 1, WP 2, WP4, WP5, WP1 contributor Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 274,12 0,50 1 137,06 WP6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 2 001,25 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 2 001,25 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,23 0,60 1 200,74 YES, WP2, WP3,WP4 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 1 200,74 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 1 200,74 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 1 728,38 1,00 1 728,38 YES, WP2, WP3,WP4 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 1 728,38 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 1 728,38 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Project manager Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 1 728,38 0,50 864,19 YES, WP2, WP3,WP4 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 864,19 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 864,19 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Specialist in Mental Health Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 1 728,38 4,08 7 051,79 WP5, WP6 Specialist in Mental Health Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 18,72 37 463,42 WP5, WP6 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 44 515,21 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 44 515,21 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 A.1 Employees (or equivalent) Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 1 548,85 1,80 2 787,93 Will contribute to all tasks Will contribute to all tasks Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 3,60 7 204,50 Analytics Specialist Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 1,80 3 602,25 Specialist in Mental Health Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 3,60 7 204,50 Specialist in Mental Health Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 1,80 3 602,25 Will contribute to all tasks Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 4 821,23 1,08 5 206,93 Will contribute to all tasks Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 274,12 1,80 4 093,42 Specialist in Mental Health Senior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 3 000,00 12,00 36 000,00 Specialist in Mental Health Junior experts/advisors/researchers monthly 2 001,25 5,89 11 787,36 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total employees (or equivalent) 81 489,14 A.2 + A.3 Natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Select a staff category monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Other [category 1] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 [category 2] monthly 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total natural persons under direct contract and seconded persons 0,00 A.4 SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary SME owners/natural person beneficiaries without salary daily 0,00 0,00 0,00 Total SME owners and natural person beneficiaries without salary 0,00 Total personnel for this WP 81 489,14 Total personnel (all WPs) 131 798,91 B. Subcontracting costs Also used for other work Costs packages? Description of subcontracted project tasks/activities (actual costs) YES/NO and which WP WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 2 [Subcontract short name] 0,00 Total subcontracting for this WP 0,00 Total subcontracting (all WPs) 0,00 C. Purchase costs Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 C.1 Travel and subsistence Costs Description (e.g. international/not international; place of Costs (unit cost) (actual costs) Also part of other work activity/destination; number of days; number of persons packages? (speakers, personnel and participants whose costs are Amount per Total YES/NO and which WP covered); transport means; average price per person; Number of units unit ( EUR) subsistence costs/daily allowances) WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 1 Kick off meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Latvia Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights (95 EUR/per night) in Latvia un 2 hotel nights (103 EUR/per night) in Poland. Amount per Accommodation costs 0,00 98,20 5,00 491,00 unit 98.2 EURO is average from both countries. 1 person, 4 days (73 EUR/per day) in Latvia un 4 hotel Subsistence costs 0,00 70,00 8,00 560,00 days (67 EUR/per day) in Poland. Amount per unit 70 EURO is average from both countries. Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 491,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 560,00 Total travel 1 592,00 2 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Spain Travel costs 0,00 900,00 1,00 900,00 1 person, 4 hotel nights (117 EUR/per night) in Spain un 2 hotel nights (103 EUR/per night) in Poland. Amount per Accommodation costs 0,00 112,33 6,00 674,00 unit 112,33 EURO is average from both countries. 1 person, 4 days ( 88 EUR/per day) in Spain and 4 days Subsistence costs 0,00 77,50 8,00 620,00 (67 EUR/per day) in Poland. Amount per unit 77,5 EURO is average from both countries. Total travel costs for this travel 900,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 674,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 620,00 Total travel 2 194,00 3 Project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 659,00 1,00 659,00 1 person, 4 hotel nights (114 EUR/per night) in Italy and 2 hotel nights (103 EUR/per night) in Poland. Amount per Accommodation costs 0,00 110,33 6,00 662,00 unit 110,33 EURO is average from both countries. 1 person, 4 days (98 EUR/per day) in Italy un 4 days (67 Subsistence costs 0,00 82,50 8,00 660,00 EUR/per day) in Poland. Amount per unit 82,5 EURO is average from both countries. Total travel costs for this travel 659,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 662,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 660,00 Total travel 1 981,00 4 Final project meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Poland Travel costs 0,00 288,00 1,00 288,00 1 person, 4 hotel nights in Poland Accommodation costs 0,00 103,00 4,00 412,00 1 person, 6 days in Poland Subsistence costs 0,00 67,00 6,00 402,00 Total travel costs for this travel 288,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 412,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 402,00 Total travel 1 102,00 Total travel costs for this WP 2 388,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 2 239,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 2 242,00 Total travel for this WP 6 869,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 4 WP4 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 0,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 0,00 Total travel for this WP 0,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 5 WP5 1 WP 5.2. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Hungary Travel costs 0,00 429,00 1,00 429,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights in Hungary Accommodation costs 0,00 105,00 3,00 315,00 1 person, 5 days in Hungary Subsistence costs 0,00 64,00 5,00 320,00 Total travel costs for this travel 429,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 315,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 320,00 Total travel 1 064,00 2 WP 5.3. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Germany Travel costs 0,00 541,00 1,00 541,00 1 person, 3 hotel nights (114 EUR/per night) in Germany un 2 hotel nights (103 EUR/per night) in Poland. Amount Accommodation costs 0,00 112,60 5,00 563,00 per unit 112.60 EURO is average from both countries. 1 person, 3 days (97 EUR/per day) in Germany un 4 days Subsistence costs 0,00 111,80 5,00 559,00 (67 EUR/per day) in Poland. Amount per unit 111.80 EURO is average from both countries. Total travel costs for this travel 541,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 563,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 559,00 Total travel 1 663,00 3 WP 5.4. technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person, travel to Italy Travel costs 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 1,00 114,00 1 person, 1 day in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 1,00 98,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 114,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 98,00 Total travel 212,00 4 5.1 Technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants 1 person travel to Netherlands Travel costs 0,00 659,00 1,00 659,00 1 person 3 hotel nights in Netherlands(133eur/per night) Accommodation costs 0,00 121,00 5,00 605,00 and 2 hotel nights in Poland (103 eur/per nights) average 121 per night. 1 person 3 days in Netherlands (103 per day), 4 days in Subsistence costs 0,00 82,43 7,00 577,00 Poland (67 eur), average 82,43 eur Total travel costs for this travel 659,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 605,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 577,00 Total travel 1 841,00 Total travel costs for this WP 1 629,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 1 597,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 1 554,00 Total travel for this WP 4 780,00 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 6 WP6 1 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Latvia Accommodation costs 0,00 95,00 1,00 95,00 1 person, 1 day in Latvia Subsistence costs 0,00 73,00 1,00 73,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 95,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 73,00 Total travel 168,00 2 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person, 1 hotel night in Spain Accommodation costs 0,00 117,00 1,00 117,00 1 persos, 1 day in Spain Subsistence costs 0,00 88,00 1,00 88,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 117,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 88,00 Total travel 205,00 3 WP 6 technical meeting Speakers Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Personnel Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Accommodation costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Subsistence costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 Participants Flight costs are included in the WP1 Travel costs 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 person 1 hotel night in Italy Accommodation costs 0,00 114,00 1,00 114,00 1 person, 1 day in Italy Subsistence costs 0,00 98,00 1,00 98,00 Total travel costs for this travel 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this travel 114,00 Total subsistence costs for this travel 98,00 Total travel 212,00 Total travel costs for this WP 0,00 Total accommodation costs for this WP 326,00 Total subsistence costs for this WP 259,00 Total travel for this WP 585,00 0,00 Total travel costs (all WPs) 4 017,00 Total accommodation (all WPs) 4 162,00 Total subsistence (all WPs) 4 055,00 Total travel and subsistence (all WPs) 12 233,99 C.2 Equipment WORK PACKAGE 1 WP1 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 2 WP2 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the Also part of other work method (e.g. Number of months action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Price packages? YES/NO and which 36 month or 60 allocated to the action less if used also for (EUR) needed WP month) other purposes) a b c d e =(c/b *d) * a 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0 0,00 0% 0,00 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total depreciation 0,00 C.2.2 Rental and leasing (rate of use/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Rate of use for the Also part of other work action (100% or Total Description of tasks/activities for which the equipment is Monthly rent/fee Number of months of use for the action packages? YES/NO and which less if used also for (EUR) needed WP other purposes) a b c d= a*b*c 1 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 2 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 0% 0,00 Associated with document Ref. Ares(2024)5119241 - 15/07/2024 ATTENTION! Can be used only if full cost option in the grant 3 [Equipment short name] 0,00 0,00 agreement Total rental and leasing 0,00 Total equipment for this WP 0,00 WORK PACKAGE 3 WP3 C.2.1 Purchase (depreciation/full cost) Costs (actual costs) Depreciation Rate of use for the
Allikas: Sotsiaalministeerium dokumendiregister →
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel