Kiri

Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Digital Europe Programme (DIGITAL) Periodic Report Technical Report (Part B) for EstQCI project -101113143 Version 1.0 10. February 2024 1 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 TECHNICAL REPORT (PART B) COVER PAGE PROJECT Project number: 101113143 Project name: Estonian Quantum Communication Infrastructure Project acronym: EstQCI REPORTING PERIOD Please note that you must report on the entire reporting period. RP number: 1 Duration: from 01/01/2023 to 31/12/2023 2  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 1. OVERVIEW OF THE PROGRESS 1.1 Summary of work performed and achievements, results and impacts Work performed and main achievements Short summary of progress towards the project objectives. Highlight significant activities and achievements. Provide clear and measureable details. Analyse the outcome of the project (so far) and its (actual and expected) impact (on target groups, change, innovation etc.), including a description of the European dimension and added value. For the Final Report, include the conclusions of the action. Report on objectives not fully achieved or not on schedule. Do not simply cut and paste the project summary (filled in online on the Summary for Publication screen). Contrary to the summary, this section is for reporting to the EU and will not be published. The project has been successfully initiated and the activities are ongoing. In the beginning of the project the management structure was created and a project amendment was made to move the project management responsibility and corresponding budget from MKM to RIKS. MKM remains as the main coordinator while the everyday project management is driven by RIKS. The consortium agreement has been signed that describes the responsibilities and tasks of each beneficiary, defines the steering committee and project monitoring means. The steering committee meets on a regular basis. Close cooperation has been achieved with the Finnish QCI project that has resulted in a tradition of joint visits to potential suppliers, joint meetings with other QCI projects and inviting each other to interesting meetings and events. The fruits of this cooperation have already materialized into aligned technical specifications of our networks that will ease the uptake of EuroQCI links between the countries. Good connections have also been achieved with neighboring countries of Latvia and Sweden. Further events and meetings between our 4 countries are being planned in order to share knowledge and prepare for future international connections. Through participation in external events and meetings with other QCI project (43 events in total) a close community of the QCI projects has been achieved. Four internal events have been organized to gather the main Stakeholders in Estonia. We began with two meetings with experts in the field (PhD J. Stepulveda and PhD H. Griesser in May 2023) to introduce the topic and start the discussions in the community. In the fall 2 information sharing events were organized. The EstQCI days held on the 5th and 6th of October was aimed to introduce the technology principals, describe the project activities and start the discussions on potential use cases with more than 60 participants. The second event was held in cooperation with the State Communications day on the 19. Of October where the target audience was state network architects and decision makers with 107 participants. In total over 85% of the target stakeholders have been reached. Based on the discussions with state network stakeholders a wonderful use case emerged for integrating QKD to the round network between data centers that will house the Estonian State Cloud. With the support from MKM and European Commission this use case has now been integrated to our project with amendment nr 2. The new round testbed will enable us to prove the functionality of quantum technology on a real-life use case and build the foundation and central backbone for the Estonian State Cloud. Through this testbed Estonia can be the groundbreaking example of how to secure the public e- services in the future and lay the building blocks from where future connections and cybersecurity solutions could emerge. Metrosert and RIKS have made an in dept research into the quantum communication technologies currently available. Deep understanding of the different technologies used has been achieved by Metrosert. Investigations into the technical solutions for building up the networks have been carried out by RIKS. Based on the research and knowledge sharing with other QCI projects the technical solution and detailed description of our network has been created. Based on the technical details, successful tender activities have been achieved despite very short timelines and all of the devices have been delivered by the end of 2023. Detailed deployment and test plans have been developed and preparations for the network have been made. The physical locations and optical connections are ready and waiting for the installation of the procured devices that is planned to January 2024. Due to the level of complexity that the additional testbed brought to our tender processes an unexpected cost for legal counsel has occurred. The additional cost has been integrated to our budget and will not affect the project activities in bigger picture. The project activities for communication and dissemination have been cautious as the topic is sensitive in the eyes of our NSA and other state institutions. The Communication and Dissemination Plan is being re- evaluated in order to allow for communication about project and its results without jeopardizing the security aspects. Communication activities towards the general public will start in the beginning of 2024. Overall, the project activities are on track without major obstacles and we are very proud of the additional testbed that has been integrated to our project. 3  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 1.2 Implementation plan and efficient use of resources Implementation plan Report on changes to the implementation plan (if any). The procurement of devices was carried out according to the Estonian Public Procurement Law. The devices arrived in the end of 2023 what is slightly later than planned and therefore pushed back the testing of the devices to the beginning of 2024. We do not see that this will affect the overall project activities. Project management, quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation strategy Report on changes to the overall project management concept, quality assurance and monitoring and evaluation strategy (if any). According to the first amendment the project management responsibility has moved from MKM to RIKS and the project coordinator resides in RIKS. Cost effectiveness and financial management (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) Inform about significant budget overruns or important changes in the financial management (if any). The public procurement for the projects original devices was successful and the final prices lower than expected. This allowed us to extend the project scope that was approved in the second project amendment. Critical risks and risk management strategy Report on the state of play concerning the risks and risk mitigation measures (if any). See Technical Report (Part A). Consortium cooperation and division of roles (if applicable) Report on changes in the way the participants work together (Beneficiaries, Affiliated Entities, Associated Partners, etc.). The roles have been divided and we see no significant changes. Project teams and staff Report and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement regarding the organisation of staff or project teams. Additional personnel have been added to the project team to carry out the activities: Research scientist PhD Matt Rammo at Metrosert Research scientist, PhD Egon Astra at Metrosert Consortium management and decision-making (if applicable) Report on important changes in the management or decision-making mechanisms. No major changes have occurred. 4  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 1.3 Impact Impact Report on changes in your impact analysis/strategy (if any) and the effects on the project/need for adaptations. Please also describe any innovations or potential innovators emerging from the project with the potential to benefit other activities of the Digital Europe Programme. Estonia has been in the forefront of digital transformation over the last decades. The addition of the round network testbed between data centers that will house the Estonian Government Cloud will bring the project activities to the forefront of technology development by using the latest technological achievements available. This will enable the us to prove the functionality of quantum technology on a real life use case and build the foundation and central backbone for the Estonian State Cloud. Through this testbed Estonia can be the groundbreaking example of how to secure the public e-services in the future and lay the building blocks from where future connections and cybersecurity solutions could emerge. Communication, dissemination and visibility of funding Report on the communication and dissemination activities undertaken (to whom, which format, how many, etc.) as foreseen in your Dissemination and communication plan. Please inform and justify any changes regarding dissemination and exploitation in comparison with the initial plan. Describe how the visibility of EU funding was ensured. If you described your project on your website(s) and/or social media accounts, please provide the links. During the first period of the project several communication and dissemination activities were carried out. From the identified main groups of stakeholders in our communication and dissemination plan the project has within the first 12 months reached and engaged 85% of the target institutions and private sector players with more than 130 stakeholders identified. In the beginning of the project meetings and smaller events were held to introduce the subject to the main stakeholders and to raise the awareness of Quantum Technology and the EstQCI project activities. Date Subject Format Attendees First meeting with Finnish QCI QCI 10 – Estonian and Finnish QCI 17.03.2023 team initiative projects Discussion with TalTech 26.04.2023 Meeting 4 - TalTech, RIKS Department of Electronics 24 - State critical communication Lecture and discussions with Stakeholder service providers, Academia, 04.05.2023 Ph.D. Johanna Sepulveda event Industry and private sector, Policy makers. 37 - State critical communication Lecture and discussions with Stakeholder service providers, Academia, 24.05.2023 Dr. Helmut Griesser event Industry and private sector, Policy makers. Planning day with EstQCI Stakeholder 15 - MKM, RIKS, Metrosert, NSA, 06.09.2023 project and RIT – incorporation event State networks (RIT) of new use case Quantum Technologies 10.11.2023 Meeting 8 - TalTech, RIKS, Metrosert discussion at TalTech Meeting with TalTech for 25.10.2023 Meeting 3 - TalTech, RIKS discussing Estonian backbone Meeting with Master student 30.10.2023 from TalTech for making a Meeting 3 - TalTech, RIKS report on the EstQCI activities Review meeting for master 28.11.2023 Meeting 3 - TalTech, RIKS student’s report First meeting for preparation of 12 - TalTech, Tartu University, 12.12.2023 Meeting the Estonian Quantum Initiative Metrosert, RIKS, KBFI 25 – participants form Finnish QCI Meeting with Finnish and QCI 18.12.2023 project and Latvian QCI project Latvian QCI projects in Riga. initiative and Quantum initiative. In the second part of the first period bigger events were held in order to gather potential stakeholders and introduce the technology and its possibilities, identify use cases and map the landscape for future 5 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 cooperations. EstQCI Information days were held on the 5th and 6th of October. The two-day conference and workshop was organized with the purpose of gathering the main stakeholders to raise awareness of QCI, share the EstQCI project plans and activities and initiate the discussion around potential use-cases. The event was very successful with over 60 participants representing a wide range of public and private sector. The project also participated in the State Communications Day, held on the 19.10.2023, what gathered the main stakeholders in the public sector. The one-day conference had 107 participants and the project presentation received high interest from the participants. One of the activities in our communication plan was participation in external events where to communicate the project activities and disseminate the lessons learned. The project partners have participated in 43 external events with wide variety of functions both online and in person: The communication of our project has been cautious in the first part of our project as significant security concerns have risen affecting our initial action plan. As the topic is very sensitive in the eyes of our NSA and internal security agency, we have not been able to communicate in large scale. The first period has been used to analyze the situation and to find communication strategies that would allow us to talk about the project and its activities without jeopardizing the security aspects. A detailed communication plan is being developed and major activities towards the general public are planned to start in the beginning of 2024. During all of the events the European flag and funding statement has been included in the visual material and also on the banners and other advertising materials. During the project presentation the EU funding has always been highlighted and all the devices bought through this project are labelled with the European flag and funding statement. See also Technical Report (Part A) 6  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Sustainability, long-term impact and continuation Report on changes in your sustainability analysis/strategy (if any). For the Final Report, describe the follow-up of the project after the end of the EU grant. How will the results be used or further developed. Describe the strategy to ensure sustainability of results and long-term impact. Comment on possible synergies/complementarities with other (EU funded) activities (if any). The addition of the round network testbed will hopefully have long-term benefits to the Estonian digital transformation and help to achieve the cybersecurity targets set out in our national Digital Agenda 2030. The aim is to guarantee the protection of our digital government, economy and digital way of life more broadly. The current cyber security capacity of the state is insufficient for preventing risks caused by development of quantum technology. Implementation of QKD will allow Estonia to be a trailblazing and leading country in specific prioritized fields of cyber security in the EU and at a broader international level. 1.4 Follow-up to EU recommendations Follow-up to EU recommendations Highlight corrective actions taken as a result of EU monitoring activities (including follow-up to EU project reviews, if any). List each recommendation/comment and explain how they have been followed up. No recommendations have been issued so far. 7  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 2. WORK PLAN, WORK PACKAGES, ACTIVITIES, RESOURCES AND TIMING 2.1 Work packages, activities, resources and timing Work Package 1 Work Package 1: Project management and procurement coordination Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) Project management is running according to the changes made in amendment 1. As the project management moved from MKM to RIKS the participation of MKM has been minimal in the first period of the project. The project activities are ongoing without major T1.1 Project management Yes issues. Communication and cooperation between beneficiaries is good and productive. The project steering committee has been established and is meeting on a regular basis. All partners have clear understanding of their activities and responsibilities. The procurement activities are completed and all devices have arrived. The technical documentation was prepared by RIKS and Metrosert. All beneficiaries performed their T1.2 Procurement coordination Yes own procurements. Considerable legal counsel was needed for the successful procurement action for the main devices acquired by RIKS. Slight delay in the delivery of the main devices but this will not affect the overall project activities. Other issues Slight delay for the deliverable of Technical documents for the 1st review meeting as the closing of the financial year and final accounting is released in the end of January and precise financial figures were not available Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available before end of January. No significant impacts foreseen as delay was aligned with project officer in the European resources and planning/timing. Commission. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) See Technical Report (Part A). 8  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. The procurement legal procedure was more complicated than expected due to the novelty of the devices and the latest extension of our project. In order to make sure that we comply with the Estonian Procurement Law the need for legal counseling became evident. Therefore, the project has an unexpected expense for legal counseling and preparation/translation of the procurement documentation. In addition to changes covered with amendment no 2, changes in the original procurement plan occurred due to reevaluation of the test plan of the devices (some devices for Metrosert were not procured). The changes have been described in the deliverable “Procurement overview” D1.4. Slightly larger personnel man months due to the two amendments to the project over the first period. No significant impact for the rest of the project is foreseen. Other issues No other issues detected Work Package 2 Work Package 2: Development of trustworthy quantum communication network topology in metropolitan area Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) Thorough research into the quantum communication technology has been performed by RIKS and Metrosert. Deep understanding of the different technologies used has been achieved by Metrosert. Investigations into the technical solutions for building up the networks have been carried out by RIKS. Cooperation with other QCI projects contributed to a better understanding of the needed ecosystem and alignment with the Finnish technical solution will lay the foundation for successful future EuroQCI connections T2.1 Preparation for the networks Yes between the countries. Based on the research, knowledge sharing and supplier visits the EstQCI testbeds technical description was developed which was the basis for the procurement procedures. A thorough test plan has been developed by RIKS and Metrosert. The test plan addresses the functionality, sustainability and safety of the devices through metrological and environmental tests by Metrosert and integration and performance in existing optical networks by RIKS. 9  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 In the original plan the testing of the devices was planned to the end of 2023 but due delays in the procurement, caused by the addition of the second testbed with project T2.2 Testing of the devices Partially amendment no 2, the delivery of the devices was delayed to the end of 2023. The testing will start in the beginning of 2024 and we do not see a significant affect for our overall activities. Other issues No other major issues occurred. Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available resources and planning/timing. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) See Technical Report (Part A). Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. No significant deviations from last amendment Other issues No other issues detected Work Package 3 – Work Package 3: Testing of deployed QCI in metropolitan area Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) Even though the work package is not planned to start before 2024, the activities to identify use T3.2 Identification of use cases Yes cases have already been started. The first stakeholder Events have been organized and the discussions around possible use cases has already materialized into a new round test bed 10  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 that has been incorporated to this project. Other issues No other major issues occurred. Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available resources and planning/timing. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) See Technical Report (Part A). Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. No significant deviations from last amendment Other issues No other issues detected Work Package 4 Work Package 4: Demonstration of long-distance quantum communication network Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) The theoretical evaluation of the long-distance testbed technological selection has started according to the timeline by RIKS and Metrosert. The results form our testbeds will give T4.1 Evaluation of technologies Yes valuable insights into the actual capabilities of the devices. We are also in close discussions with other QCI projects to share knowledge of devices working based on different QKD protocols with the purpose to map the tested performance of all available 11  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 device types. This cooperation will give valuable information for planning the long- distance network. The planning for the long-distance network in the field has begun and discussions are Planning of the long-distance ongoing with fiber and security experts in the field. Tallinn University of Technology has T4.4 Yes network in the field been included in the discussions of potential fiber connections. The activity is driven by RIKS and active discussions are ongoing for potential options for the future network. Other issues No other major issues occurred. Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available resources and planning/timing. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) No deliverables or milestones in the first period. Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. No significant deviations from last amendment Other issues No other issues detected Work Package 5 Work Package 5: Regional coordination and EuroQCI integration Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) 12  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Close cooperation has been achieved with our neighboring countries. Very close and fruitful collaboration is with the Finnish QCI project, where we have visited potential suppliers together and invite the other side to interesting meetings with other QCI projects, potential suppliers and other technical experts. A joint meeting has been held Planning of cross-border T5.1 Yes between Latvia, Estonia and Finnish projects to discuss potential cross border connections connections and their technical solutions. Connection to Swedish QCI project has been established and future cooperation plans and events between the 4 countries are being discussed. The activities have been driven by the project manager with active participation from RIKS and Metrosert The EstQCI project has created good relations with most of the other QCI projects in the DEP call. The relations have been established through participation in the EuroQCI initiative events or workshops and through separate meetings with the NatQCI project Participation in the EuroQCI leaders (in total 43 events). The project coordinator is part of the EuroQCI working group, initiative and collaboration with the EuroQCI Technical working group and also the Estonian representative in the NQI’s. the DIGITAL topic 3 project (co- T5.5 Yes ordination and support action The participation in the initiatives, collaboration and knowledge sharing with other QCI CSA) and with other EuroQCI projects has given valuable insights into the development of our national and EuroQCI projects. network. Detailed description of attended events can be found in the Communications report chapter 6. Other issues No other major issues occurred. Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available resources and planning/timing. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) See Technical Report (Part A). Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. No significant deviations from last amendment Other issues No other issues detected Work Package 6 13  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Work Package 6: Creating impact and dissemination Activities Report on the implementation status of the activities that were to be implemented during the reporting period and explain deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. In case an activity was not implemented or a deliverable not produced, please explain why. Task No Task Name Implemented? Justification (continuous numbering (Yes/No/Partially) (explain what was done and by whom; explain what was not done and why not; indicate how you linked to WP) intend to handle the situation and new timing; indicate if it was a one-off issue or how you intend to avoid similar issues in the future) During the first year of the project there has been a re-evaluation of the sensitivity of the content created during the quantum communication project which has led to a re- evaluation of the original communication and dissemination plan. The re-evaluation concerns mainly the activities towards the general public, which have been postponed and will take place in the second half of the project. In the first half of the project, we aimed our efforts towards the target groups identified in our Dissemination and Communication plan. Estonia is one of the smallest countries in EU and this has given us an advantage of being able to reach up to 85% of the main stakeholders already within the first 12 months of this project. In the second half of the project the communication towards the general public will take place with special emphasis on raising general knowledge of quantum technologies. In order to enhance the communication tools a project logo and visual identity was developed. Different templates for future presentations and documents were created and Implementation of the are in use. T6.1 Yes communication plan Four main dissemination activities were organized that showed very positive feedback from the participants and created a productive discussion around potential use-cases. During these discussions a very promising use case emerged for securing the Estonian Government Cloud with QKD. This use case has now been integrated into our project. Communication results in numbers: • 85% of the identified target groups reached • more than 130 stakeholders identified and reached • 4 stakeholder events organized Lecture and discussions with Ph.D. Johanna Sepulveda 4.05.2023, 24 participants Lecture and discussions with Dr. Helmut Griesser 24.05.2023, 37 participants 14  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 EstQCI Information days, 5th and 6th of October 2023, 60 participants State Communication Day, 19.10.2023, 107 participants • Over 80 stakeholders participated in our events • Participation in 39 external events (including online participations) • New use-case added to project scope • Estonian Quantum Initiative preparation kicked off • Connections to 7 other QCI projects established and EstQCI project activities shared • Close cooperation with Finland and Latvia QCI projects achieved The first larger Stakeholder events were organized in Q3 2023 ahead of schedule with very positive outcomes. Two events have been organized: EstQCI Information days (5th and 6th of October 2023) with the purpose of gathering the main stakeholders to raise awareness of QCI, share the EstQCI project plans and T6.2 Stakeholder events Yes activities and initiate the discussion around potential use-cases. The event was very successful with over 60 participants representing a wide range of public and private sector. State Communication Day, held on the 19.10.2023, what gathered the main stakeholders in the public sector. The one-day conference had 107 participants and the project presentation received high interest from the participants. The planning for support measures for the industry has just begun. The development of Planning of support measures for National Quantum Initiative has also been started by Metrosert who has gathered the T6.3 Yes the industry relevant stakeholders and first directions of where to focus are starting to mature. The strategy is to identify if we can plan for support measures to the industry through the NQI. Other issues Mention and explain unexpected events and adjustments that had to be made. Explain impact on other tasks, available resources and planning/timing. Milestones and deliverables (outputs/outcomes) See Technical Report (Part A). Budget implementation — Use of resources (deviations) (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) (n/a for Additional Prefinancing Report) Explain deviations from the budget planning (i.e. differences between actual and planned use of resources, especially for personnel). Include explanations on transfers of cost categories in the estimated budget (if applicable) /If needed, add explanations linked to the report on the use of resources filled in online. Ensure consistency with that report. No significant deviations. 15  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Other issues No other issues detected Timetable Timetable (projects of more than 2 years) Report on deviations from Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement. Fill in the planned implementation in beige and the deviations in red. Adapt and repeat lines/columns as necessary. Starting date: 01.01.2023 -31.12.2023 YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 ACTIVITY Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 T1.1 - Project management T1.2 - Procurement coordination T1.3 - Alignment with the security baseline T2.1 – Preparation for the networks T2.2 – Testing of the devices Devices arrived in end of December 2023 T2.3.1 – Deployment of the metropolitan network T2.3.2 – Deployment of the round network T3.1.1 – Evaluation of the metropolitan network T3.1.2 – Evaluation of the round network T3.2 – Identification of use cases Use case identification activities started already in Q3 2023 T3.3.1 – First use cases in the metropolitan network T3.3.2 – First use cases in the round network T3.4 – Knowledge dissemination T4.1 – Evaluation of technologies Devices arrived in end of December 2023 T4.2 – Test planning and execution of long-distance network T4.3 – Demonstration of the network T4.4 – Planning of the long-distance network in the field 16  Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 T5.1 – Planning of cross-border connections T5.2 – Planning of international testing T5.3 – Discussions on possible satellite interconnection Discussions already started in end of 2023 T5.4 – International stakeholder events T5.5 - Participation in the EuroQCI initiative and collaboration with the DIGITAL topic 3 project (co- ordination and support action CSA) and with other EuroQCI projects. T6.1 – Implementation of the communication plan T6.2 – Stakeholder events First events organized already in Q2 2023 T6.3 – Planning of support measures for the industry 17 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 3. OTHER 3.1 Ethics Ethics If your Application Form contains a section on ethics, report on the status of the ethics deliverables (if any). See Technical Report (Part A). Report on any changes to ethics issues identified in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement (if any). No ethics issues to report Report on new ethics issues that have come up during the project implementation and the measures taken to solve/avoid them (if any). Ethics Issue Description Work Package Lead Beneficiary Proposed No No Measures - - - - - 3.2 Security Security Report on the status of the security deliverables (if any). No security deliverables in 1-st period Report on any changes to security issues identified in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement (if any). During the first year of the project there has been a re-evaluation of the sensitivity of the content created during the quantum communication project which has led to a re-evaluation of the original communication and dissemination plan. The re-evaluation concerns mainly the activities towards the general public, which have been postponed and will take place in the second half of the project. Report on new security issues that have come up during the project implementation and the measures taken to solve/avoid them (if any). Security Description Work Package Lead Beneficiary Proposed Issue No No Measures Re-evaluation of the 1 Dissemination to general public 6 MKM communication and dissemination plan. 4. DECLARATIONS Double funding 18 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Information concerning other EU grants for this project Please note that there is a strict prohibition of double funding from the EU budget (except YES/NO under EU Synergies actions). We confirm that to our best knowledge neither the project as a whole nor any parts of it benefit/have benefitted from any other EU grant (including EU funding managed by authorities in EU Member States or other funding bodies (e.g. EU Regional Funds, EU Yes Agricultural Funds, etc). If NO, explain and provide details We confirm that to our best knowledge neither the project as a whole nor any parts of it are (nor will be) submitted for any other EU grant (including EU funding managed by authorities in EU Member States or other funding bodies (e.g. EU Regional Funds, EU Agricultural Yes Funds, etc). If NO, explain and provide details. 19 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 FINANCIAL REPORT INDIVIDUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT The Financial Statement must be filled out directly on the Portal Financial Statements screen. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT The consolidated Financial Statement is generated automatically by the system. ANNEXES LIST OF ANNEXES Standard Use of Resources Report (annex 1 to Part B) (to be filled out directly on the Financial Statements screen) — mandatory (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) Certificate on the financial statements (CFS) (annex 2 to Part B) (template available on Portal Reference Documents) — mandatory if threshold reached (n/a for Lump Sum Grants) Special n/a 20 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Annex 1 REPORT ON THE USE OF RESOURCES — COST EXPLANATIONS The report must be filled out directly on the Portal Financial Statements screen. GRANT Project number: 101113143 Project name: Estonian Quantum Communication Infrastructure Project acronym: EstQCI REPORTING PERIOD Please note that you must report on the entire reporting period. RP number: 1 Duration: from 1.01.2023 to 31.12.2023 PARTICIPANT Number: 1 Short name: MAJANDUS JA KOMMUNIKATSIOONIMINISTEERIUM No expenses to report for this period PARTICIPANT Number: 4 Short name: Kaitseministeerium No expenses to report for this period PARTICIPANT Number: 2 Short name: AKTSIASELTS METROSERT Personnel costs Financial Statement screen — When you enter the costs, pop-ups will appear to ask you for more details. Personnel costs declared as actual costs (if applicable) Person-months Work Package 21 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 2.0 WP 1 8.2 WP 2 8.1 WP 4 1.0 WP 5 Personnel costs declared as unit costs (if applicable) Person months Work Package - - In-kind contributions provided by third parties (seconded personnel) Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments Not applicable. Subcontracting costs One line per subcontract. Double-check consistency with the information on subcontracting in the Technical Report (Part B) – Activities and work packages. Subcontract name Foreseen in Explanations Costs (subcontracted action tasks) Annex 1? (if not in Annex 1) for this RP (EUR) - - - - Total - [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments Nota applicable Purchase costs (travel and subsistence, equipment and other goods works and services) Details for major cost items (needed if costs declared under ‘purchase costs’ are higher than 15% of the claimed personnel costs). Start with the most expensive cost items, down to the 15% threshold. Travel and subsistence Cost item name Category WP Foreseen in Explanatio Costs (s) Annex 1? ns (EUR) (if not in Annex 1) First meeting with Finnish Travel and 5 Yes 3 persons 449,56 QCI team, Helsinki Subsistence CEF Networks Conference, Travel and 5 Yes 1 person 852,81 Prague Subsistence Visit to QTI in Florence Italy Travel and 1 Yes 1 person 1 205,19 with the Finnish QCI team Subsistence 22 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Visit to ThinkQuantum in Travel and Padova, Italy with the 1 Yes 1 person 810,79 Subsistence Finnish QCI team 6th Annual ScyLight Conference, Workshop Travel and 5 Yes 1 person 1 776,53 Quantum Internet, Athens, Subsistence Greece European Quantum Travel and Technologies conference, 5 Yes 1 person 837,7 Subsistence Hannover, Germany Meeting for Finnish- Travel and Estonian-Latvian QCI teams, 5 Yes 1 person 280,22 Subsistence Riga, Latvia Total 6 212,80 Equipment Cost item name WP Foreseen Explanations Costs (s) in Annex (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) 1? SPAD 2,3,4 YES 42 600,00 Two White Rabbit low- 2, 3, 4 YES 10 350,00 jitter switches Entangled photon pair source at telecom 2, 3, 4 YES 56 000,00 wavelengths Pulsed laser 2, 3, 4 YES 12 955,00 Two Optical Time 3, 4 YES 21 245,86 Domain Reflectometers Optical Wavelength 3, 4 YES 28 800,00 Meter Total 171 950,86 Other goods works and services Cost item name WP Foreseen Explanations Costs (s) in Annex (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) 1? Attenuators, optic patch cables, Materials from FS.COM adapters for 2, 4 NO 207,07 GmbH laboratory testing specially for this project Optical fiber circulator, attenuator adapters, polarization Materials from Thorlabs 2, 4 NO 3 731,78 controller needed specially for this project Fiber optical services Construction services: 2,3 YES for the metropolitan 3 639,95 fiber optical cable network connection 23 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Management system solution for access and management of Network management 2,3,4 YES the QKD testbeds 5 480,60 systems including support and installation equipment. Laptop for the Dell Latitude 5440, management of the 2,3,4 NO for managing the 823,00 networks QKD devices EVS-EN IEC 61315:2019 to base Standard 2,4 NO the testing to 28,50 previous standardization For EstQCI devices, Rack 2,3,4 NO specially for this 941,5 project Total 14 852,40 In-kind contributions provided by third parties Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments Not applicable Internally invoiced goods and services (if applicable) One line per cost item. Item name WP(s) Foreseen in Explanations Costs Annex 1? (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) - - - - - Total - In-kind contributions provided by third parties Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments - 24 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 PARTICIPANT Number: 3 Short name: STATE INFOCOMMUNICATION FOUNDATION Personnel costs Financial Statement screen — When you enter the costs, pop-ups will appear to ask you for more details. Personnel costs declared as actual costs (if applicable) Person-months Work Package 8,2 WP 1 13,4 WP 2 0,4 WP 3 0,3 WP 4 2,6 WP 5 5,3 WP 6 Personnel costs declared as unit costs (if applicable) Person months Work Package - - In-kind contributions provided by third parties (seconded personnel) Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments Not applicable Purchase costs (travel and subsistence, equipment and other goods works and services) Details for major cost items (needed if costs declared under ‘purchase costs’ are higher than 15% of the claimed personnel costs). Start with the most expensive cost items, down to the 15% threshold. Travel and subsistence Cost item name Category WP Foreseen in Explanatio Costs (s) Annex 1? ns (EUR) (if not in Annex 1) Supplier visit – QTI, Travel and 1 Yes 3 041,41 Florenze Italy 8-10.05.2023 Subsistence Supplier visit – Travel and ThinkQuantum, Padova Italy 1 Yes 2 984,90 Subsistence 28-31.05.2023 25 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Prague QCI conference, Travel and Check Republic 17- 2 Yes 1 715,63 Subsistence 20.04.2023 EQTC conference, Travel and Hannover, Germany 16- 5 Yes 1 655,70 Subsistence 20.10.2023 EuroQCI Technical Working Travel and Groups meeting, Brussels 5 Yes 1 576,61 Subsistence Belgium 6-9.11.2023 FortiNet conference, Greece Travel and 2 Yes 1 513,03 7-10.11.2023 Subsistence EuroQCI NQI's meeting Travel and Brussels, Belgium 8- 5 Yes 1 415,66 Subsistence 9.06.2023 Lat-Est-FIN meeting in Riga, Travel and 2 Yes 1 404,36 Latvia 18.12.2023 Subsistence Meeting with Finnish QCI Travel and team, Helsinki Finland 2 Yes 566,12 Subsistence 17.03.2023 Total 15 873,42 Equipment Cost item name WP Foreseen Explanations Costs (s) in Annex (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) 1? QKD equipment 3 device pairs 2 Yes 639 360,00 SNSPD detector 3 Yes 201 600,00 Encryptors 2 Yes 783 719,46 Total 1 624 679,46 Other goods works and services Cost item name WP Foreseen Explanations Costs (s) in Annex (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) 1? More complicated procurement procedure than expected due to Legal support for project extension. 1 No 12 686,60 tender process Legal counsel was needed to make sure we comply with Estonian Procurement Law Event - EstQCI information days 5- 6 Yes 11 627,43 6.10.2023 Event - State communication day 6 Yes 4 245,39 19.10.2023 Communication - 6 Yes 2 754,00 Visual identity and logo 26 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 Event - EstQCI 2;6 Yes 2 055,69 planning day 6.09.2023 Stakeholder events- Lectures with J. Stepulveda (4.05.2023) 2;6 Yes 890,77 and H. Griesser (24.05.2023) Total 34 259,88 In-kind contributions provided by third parties Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments Not applicable Internally invoiced goods and services (if applicable) One line per cost item. Item name WP(s) Foreseen in Explanations Costs Annex 1? (if not in Annex 1) (EUR) - - - - - Total - In-kind contributions provided by third parties Not applicable. [OPTION for adjustment to previous financial statements Explanations on adjustments 27 Project: 101113143 — EstQCI — DEP EU Grants: Periodic report - 1 HISTORY OF CHANGES PUBLICATION VERSION CHANGE DATE 0.1 8.01.2022 Initial version 0.2 12.01.2022 RIKS data added 0.3 25.01.2022 RIKS financial data added 0.4 27.01.2022 Metrosert data and financial data added 1,0 10.02.2022 Final financial data submitted 28 Critical implementation risks and mitigation actions Foreseen Risks Foreseen risks The table shows the risks already listed in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreement (read-only). Risk No Description Work Package No(s) Proposed Mitigation Measures Costs of QQI systems rise due to Procurements based on price. Eventual 1 WP2,WP3,WP4 high demand from EU countries changes in the project plan to use less devices. Close collaboration with partners to exchange 2 Equipment is not working as foreseen WP2,WP3,WP4 experiences and best practices. Availability of non-EU devices which might be more advanced. Proactive engagement to bring together Low interest of stakeholders to 3 WP3 international stakeholders to exchange ideas develop new products and services and find potential services and customers. Too few experts in Estonia to 4 WP2,WP3,WP4 Collaboration with other Member States to train experts. fulfil the tasks of the project. Neighbouring countries (Latvia, Lithuania) Proactive close collaboration with other Baltic 5 are not interested in developing WP5,WP4 countries. Alternatively prepare EuroQCI connections networks and cross-border connections. through Finland, who is well advanced in the project. Careful and thorough preparation of the amendment Project amendment to incorporate the justification and supporting documentation is crucial round network to the prject is not approved 6 WP2,WP1,WP3 for a successful proposal. It ensures that all the or not approved in time to be able to necessary information is provided, and the rationale purchase the needed equipment in 2023. for the amendment is clear and well-documented. Unforeseen Risks No Unforeseen Risk has been identified for this action 1 State of play State of play Conlinuous Reporting (Critica/ Risks screen) - Give the slale of play of the risks that were identified in Annex 1 of the Grant Agreemenl (and new risks that materialised during project implementation) and add new mitigaüon measures, if needed. Risk No Period Did you apply risk mitigation measures? Did your risk materialise? Comments The price level of the QKD devices 1 1 Yes No was lower than expected and therefore the risk did not materialise. The devices are just being installed and 2 1 Yes No configured. No major issues so far but full extent will be evident during testing. Most public stakeholders included in project activities, interest is high. 3 1 Yes No Private sector is interested to be kept informed but not willing to start activities. Currently all project activities 4 1 Yes No are covered with personell. Good cooperation achieved with Finnland and 5 1 Yes No Latvia. Further actions are being planned. No confirmed agreements made so far. With thurow preparation and cooperation 6 1 Yes No with suppliers the project amendment was approved and the devices reached us in time. 2 3. DELIVERABLES Work New Due Delivery Deliverable Dissemination Deliverable Name Package Lead Beneficiary Type Due Date Date (if Date Status Comments No Level No delay) (actual) Technical documents 31 14 D1.1 for the 1st review WP1 MKM R SEN December February SUBMITTED meeting 2023 2024 31 29 Procurement D1.4 WP1 MKM R SEN December December SUBMITTED overview 2023 2023 31 29 D2.3 Deployment plan WP2 RIKS R SEN December December SUBMITTED 2023 2023 Report on participation to the EuroQCI 31 29 D5.2 initiative and on WP5 MKM R PU December December SUBMITTED the collaboration 2023 2023 with other DIGITAL projects, part 1 31 29 Communication D6.1 WP6 MKM R PU December December SUBMITTED report, 1st period 2023 2023 Report on 30 June 31 May D6.3 dissemination and WP6 MKM R PU SUBMITTED 2023 2023 exploitation 1 LIST OF MILESTONES Milestones Continuous Reporting (Milestones screen) — Update the status (and add new due date for late milestones, together with an explanation for the delay). In the Comments, please indicate if the milestone was achieved as planned or not. MS Milestone Name Work Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Delivery Delivery Achieved Comments No Package Date Date No (actual) 1 Management setup WP1 MKM Feedback from partners 31/3/2023 31/3/2023 Yes 2 Technical specifications WP1 MKM All specification tables 30/6/2023 22/6/2023 Yes filled 3 Procurements WP1 MKM All tenders available in the 30/9/2023 22/12/2023 Yes public procurement portal 4 Deployment plan for WP2 RIKS Document is available 31/12/2023 29/12/2023 Yes metropolitan network 5 Equipment tested WP2 Metrosert Test report and data 30/6/2024 No available 6 Metropolitan network WP2 RIKS Network is available for 30/6/2025 No deployed use cases and testing 7 Evaluation report of the WP3 Metrosert Evaluation report available 30/6/2025 No metropolitan network for all participants 8 First use cases of the WP3 MKM At least two use cases in 30/6/2025 No metropolitan network the network, description of use cases available. 9 Long-distance network WP4 Metrosert Evaluation report 30/6/2024 No technologies evaluated 10 First demonstration of the WP4 Metrosert Test report, data 30/6/2025 No long-distance network 1 Milestones Continuous Reporting (Milestones screen) — Update the status (and add new due date for late milestones, together with an explanation for the delay). In the Comments, please indicate if the milestone was achieved as planned or not. MS Milestone Name Work Lead Beneficiary Means of Verification Delivery Delivery Achieved Comments No Package Date Date No (actual) 11 Plan for a long-distance WP4 RIKS The deployment plan is 30/6/2025 No network available 12 Identification of cross WP5 MKM At least two cooperation 31/12/2024 No border partners agreements with neighbouring countries. 13 Design of the cross-border WP5 MKM Document is available 31/12/2024 No network as a part of cooperation agreements 14 Feasibility analysis for the WP5 RIKS Study report 30/6/2025 No satellite link 15 International stakeholder WP5 MKM At least two international 30/6/2025 No cooperation events held. 16 Communication plan WP6 MKM All relevant target 30/6/2025 No groups reached (industry, academia, regulatory, general public) 17 Stakeholder involvement WP6 MKM Event reports indicate 30/6/2025 No involvement of at least 25 different stakeholders 18 Interim review WP1 MKM Interim review report 29/2/2024 No 2