PIANC
The World Association for
Brussels, 23 February 2018.
Waterborne Transport Infrastructure
To the First Delegates of the
Qualifying Members of PIANC
To the National Sections’
Secretaries of PIANC
The Sister Associations of PIANC
Subject: Setting up of a new MarCom Working Group 208 on “Planning for Automation of
Container Terminals”.
Dear Madam,
Dear Sir,
The setting up of MarCom Working Group 208 on “Planning for Automation of Container Terminals” has
duly been approved as well as its terms of reference, which are enclosed herewith.
We kindly ask you to inform the secretariat of MarCom by 31 May 2018 (copy to the General Secretariat)
about the name, qualification and (e-mail-) address of the expert (and her/his alternate), proposed by your
country/organisation. Please enclose a brief curriculum vitae of the proposed expert together with some
details about her/his professional experiences.
A second expert per country/organisation, being a young professional, can participate in the Working Group
activities. Further I would like to remind you that Working Group Members should either be Individual Member
of PIANC, working for a Corporate Member, be an invited expert or a be a member of a Sister Organisation.
We remind you that in accordance with PIANC rules, the costs incurred in taking part in Working Group
activities are borne by the member countries/organizations.
We thank you beforehand for your collaboration.
Yours sincerely,
Geert Van Cappellen,
Secretary-General
Reply to:
Mrs. Noelia Gonzalez
DRAGADOS – Technical Directorate
Head of Marine Works
Avda. Camino de Santiago 50
28050 Madrid – Spain
[email protected]
PIANC
The World Association for
Waterborne Transport Infrastructure
MarCom WG 208
Planning for Automation of Container Terminals
Terms of Reference
1. Historical Background (definition of the problem)
As worldwide container traffic continues to grow, operators face challenges in boosting productivity at
their terminals, either at existing facilities or at new sites. Environmental issues are also increasingly
important, and not only should container handling equipment achieve high levels of performance but in
doing so should be environmentally friendly.
The increasing demand for innovative handling solutions has led to the use of automated stacking cranes
(ASCs) at an increasing number of terminals. Although these have a higher capital cost than RTGs and
require dedicated crane rail systems, ASCs provide high stacking densities, high working speeds, high
handling rates and an optimum use of space. As they are driverless, further benefits include improved
productivity, lower labour and operating costs, a greater degree of safety than other container handling
systems and dependable operation in virtually all weathers.
Continuous technology development is reducing the capital cost of automation and providing increased
productivity, as well as increasing the opportunities for semi-automated or fully automated small and
medium terminals.
2. Objectives of the Working Group
Today's container terminals can be divided into small, medium and large terminals. Among the large
terminals, very few have automated terminals today and few of them have started the automation
process. Most terminals are operating the “old” way with conventional equipment. Most large new
terminals, which are under construction, are planning for a semi- or fully-automated operation. Even some
medium and small terminals are being automated because of the cost of technology and the
productivity potential. This means that in a few years it will be normal that all new container terminals and
many existing will have semi-automatic or fully automatic solutions.
Increased focus on safety demands fewer people working in the terminal. The human environment today
should be a first priority, and most of container terminals are owned or operated by professional
international operators who have a very strong focus on that point.
The increased focus on the environment also points towards automation by using more cranes in the
terminal and using equipment with electric power and battery technology to reduce emissions.
The WG report should provide guidance to owners, operators and designers of container terminals
worldwide, in order to provide safer, environmentally and cost-effective operation of the terminals. The
report will be considered as an addition to existing standards, but on this topic few any standards exist
and this report will be very useful for design and operations.
3. Existing Reports
There is at least two reports, “Criteria for the (Un)loading of Container Vessels ”(WG115) and
“Design Principles for Small and Medium Marine Container Terminals” (WG135), which has some
input which can be interesting for this new TOR. However, there must be a survey if there are
reports, which contain important information related to the topic of automation of container
terminals in a broad perspective. A contact with IAPH may be useful on this topic.
4. Matters to be Investigated
The matters to be investigated when planning an automated terminal are all aspects around
a container terminal including: STS cranes, terminal equipment such as RTG cranes, RMG
cranes, straddle carriers, shuttle carriers, AGV vehicles etc, land installation included
automated gate solutions, management system for containers and safety aspects in the
terminal. Requirements for new terminals and upgrading of existing terminals should be
considered.
5. Suggested Final Product of the Working Group
The final product will be recommendations and guidelines for planning both semi- and fully-
automated container terminals, Greenfield terminals and upgrading of existing terminals.
6. Desirable Disciplines of the Members of the Working Group
In addition to the owners and operators of container terminals, the Working Group members
should represent all parties involved including consulting engineers, contractors and public
authorities. Members with a research background and ship owners will also be welcome.
7. Relevance for Countries in Transition
The recommendations and guidelines will help countries in transition with increased knowledge
about modern container terminals and the potential productivity gains that can be achieved
during semi or full automation of the container terminals.
8. Climate Change
Climate change needs to be considered in the planning and design of port infrastructure and
civil engineering projects.
Subject: FW: PIANC setting up a new MarCom Wg on planning for automation of
container terminals
Attachments: letter & tor 208.pdf
Importance: High
From: Sabine Vandevelde [mailto:
[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 12:44 PM
To: Sabine Vandevelde <
[email protected]>
Subject: PIANC setting up a new MarCom Wg on planning for automation of container terminals
Importance: High
Dear All,
See attached file,
Kind regards,
Sabine Van de Velde
PIANC General Secretariat
Koning Albert II laan 20 – bus 3
1000 Brussels – Belgium
Tel: 02/553.71.61 – Fax: 02/553.71.55