dokumendiregister.ee
Sissetulev kiriAvalik

Selgitustaotlus

Rahapesu Andmebüroo · 6. aprill 2021
Viit
1.2-2/15-1
Registreeritud
6. aprill 2021
Dokumendi liik
Sissetulev kiri
Adressaat
P. G.
Saabumis/saatmisviis
e-post
Funktsioon
1.2 Õigusteenindus ja õigusloome. Väärtegude menetlemine ja sunni rakendamine
Sari
1.2-2 Õigusloome ja õigusteeninduse kirjavahetus
Toimik
1.2-2/2021
Vastutaja
Struktuurüksus on tunnistatud asutusesiseseks kasutamiseks (alus: RahaPTS § 53 lg 4)
Lahendamise tähtaeg
6. mai 2021

Failid

Sisu (failidest)

Saatja: Pavel Ginzhul <[email protected]> Saadetud: 06.04.2021 13:42 Adressaat: Rahapesu <[email protected]> Koopia: Andrei Bulgakov <[email protected]> Teema: Zeply - ML/TF Act question - Proof of Address req Manused: Outlook-kjin4ktl.png TÄHELEPANU! Tegemist on väljastpoolt asutust saabunud kirjaga. Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile mitte avada! Hello there, Hope you're doing great. I am contacting you today in regards to the ML/TF Act in an attempt to get additional clarification on paragraph §20 (1) 4 & §20 (2), respectively. The reason being is that these clauses are not self-explanatory in the sense of how the obligated entity must 'identify' permanent seat and/or place of residence of the natural person. Provided that the obligated entity follows the ML/TF Act in every other regard could you kindly direct our attention on how the obligated entity should be assessing this information, see the examples below: -a written text from a client identifying its own address; OR -a written text from a client identifying its own address that is cross-referenced/ascertained with publicly available information; OR -a written text from a client identifying its own address that is also evidenced/supported by the third and independent party document (ie utility service provider). Thank you in advance for providing for looking into this. Looking forward to hearing from you soon, PAVEL GINZHUL www.zeply.com
Allikas: Rahapesu Andmebüroo dokumendiregister →