Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Selgitustaotlus
Rahapesu Andmebüroo · 6. aprill 2021
- Viit
- 1.2-2/15-1
- Registreeritud
- 6. aprill 2021
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Adressaat
- P. G.
- Saabumis/saatmisviis
- e-post
- Funktsioon
- 1.2 Õigusteenindus ja õigusloome. Väärtegude menetlemine ja sunni rakendamine
- Sari
- 1.2-2 Õigusloome ja õigusteeninduse kirjavahetus
- Toimik
- 1.2-2/2021
- Vastutaja
- Struktuurüksus on tunnistatud asutusesiseseks kasutamiseks (alus: RahaPTS § 53 lg 4)
- Lahendamise tähtaeg
- 6. mai 2021
Sisu (failidest)
Saatja: Pavel Ginzhul <[email protected]>
Saadetud: 06.04.2021 13:42
Adressaat: Rahapesu <[email protected]>
Koopia: Andrei Bulgakov <[email protected]>
Teema: Zeply - ML/TF Act question - Proof of Address req
Manused: Outlook-kjin4ktl.png
TÄHELEPANU! Tegemist on väljastpoolt asutust saabunud kirjaga. Tundmatu saatja korral palume linke ja faile
mitte avada!
Hello there,
Hope you're doing great.
I am contacting you today in regards to the ML/TF Act in an attempt to get additional
clarification on paragraph §20 (1) 4 & §20 (2), respectively.
The reason being is that these clauses are not self-explanatory in the sense of how the
obligated entity must 'identify' permanent seat and/or place of residence of the natural
person.
Provided that the obligated entity follows the ML/TF Act in every other regard could you
kindly direct our attention on how the obligated entity should be assessing this information,
see the examples below:
-a written text from a client identifying its own address; OR
-a written text from a client identifying its own address that is cross-referenced/ascertained
with publicly available information; OR
-a written text from a client identifying its own address that is also evidenced/supported by
the third and independent party document (ie utility service provider).
Thank you in advance for providing for looking into this.
Looking forward to hearing from you soon,
PAVEL GINZHUL
www.zeply.com