Vastus

Saatja: "Eva Kalniņa" <[email protected]> Saaja: "Kersti Kunder" <[email protected]>, "LIAA Invest" <[email protected]> Teema: Re: Inquiry Regarding the Application of EU Regulation 651/2014 and Harmonization of Requirements in the Baltic Region Kuupäev: 2024-10-15 06:21 Dear Kersti, Thank you very much for the information you provided, it is very helpful for us, as in Latvia the evaluating authorities refer to the requirement to request financial reports from each group entity. Could you kindly send the explanation you mentioned regarding the European Commission's explanation (European Commission has explained: As already set out in replies to earlier questions, the other criteria of Article 2(18)...)? This would help us better understand the approach. Additionally, I have requested the Latvian evaluation department to provide answers to the questions of your interest. Once the information is prepared, I will forward it to you. Regards, Eva Kalniņa Projektu attīstības nodaļa Investīciju projektu departaments Pērses iela 2, Rīga, LV-1442 Mob. Tālr.: +371 26414932 liaa.gov.lv <http://www.liaa.gov.lv/> latvia.eu _____ From: Kersti Kunder <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2024 17:56 To: LIAA Invest <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Andris Blumbahs <[email protected]>; Eva Kalniņa <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Inquiry Regarding the Application of EU Regulation 651/2014 and Harmonization of Requirements in the Baltic Region UZMANĪBU: Šis ir ārējs e-pasts, esiet piesardzīgi, atverot pielikumus un saites. Dear Colleagues Thank You for Your questions, what a great initiative to standardize practices between member states! I think we can have an open discussion here. Our answers from Estonian Business and Innovation Agency (Enterprise Estonia): 1. What financial information do you require from company groups to ensure that they are not classified as "undertakings in difficulty"?- We use the last approved annual report. Estonian companies provide their annual reports to the Estonian Business register by 30 of June every year, and reports are accessible to all: Search for a legal person | e-Äriregister (rik.ee) <https://ariregister.rik.ee/eng> However – if the company is in difficuties based on annual report, we ask them to provide a more recent report which would show that they are not in difficulties any more. If there are foreign companies in the group, we ask applicant to provide their last approved annual reports. 2. Do you assess related companies, such as other companies owned by the parent company, using the parent company’s consolidated financial statements, or do you require individual financial reports from each company within the group? – can be done both ways. At first we evaluate on the applicant level and then on the group level. If we have consolidated data, then group level will be evaluated on the basis of consolidated data. If the applicant does not provide us consolidated data, then we take annual reports from Business register or ask from applicant all the group members annual reports and evaluate them separately. We also assess all companies owned through natural person who has majority stake in other companies (over 50% shares). We do not consider partner companies (25-50% shares) to be part of the group when determing undertakings in difficulties. European Comission has explained: As already set out in replies to earlier questions, the other criteria of Article 2(18) for determining whether an undertaking is in difficulty need to be assessed at both, the level of the legal entity applying for aid and the level of the group to which such entity belongs. The assessment at the level of the group should be carried out on the basis of consolidated financial statements. If such consolidated financial statements are not available it is possible to carry out a plausibility check of the financial situation of the group on the basis of stand-alone financial statements of the individual entities forming the group, by adding up these stand alone financial statements. It is not necessary to assess separately individual entities forming a group. We don`t have regulation or rules written down in one document at the moment unfortunately regarding UID. But we do use EC User guide to the SME Definition. I hope this is information is useful. We have some questions about your practises regarding the size of the company: 1. How you determine the number of employees – do you count members of the management board, owners (shareholders), members of the supervisory board? They are usually not counted in annual reports. 2. In case one natural person owns the majority shares in company A and also in companies B and C – do you consider all these companies as linked companies even if they do not operate on the same or adjacent markets? 3. If the majority of shares is owned by more individuals (acting jointly) – do you consider the enterprises involved as linked if they operate on the same or adjacent markets? 4. Do you count same family members acting jointly and having several companies as single economic entity (a group)? T.ex. if individuals acting jointly have same surnames, how do you determine they are relatives and acting jointly? 5. When determing the size of the group, do you have some exceptions for some group members? T.ex If an aid applicant (company) is part of a larger group, but he has different field of activity and you don`t count this applicant to group and he may be small enterprise although group is large enterprise – is it possible? Hope all of you find time to answer! PS! Can we save your contacts in case we have further questions regarding similar questions about UID and defining the size of the company? Best regards Kersti Kunder Senior Consultant Reporting and Information Grant Centre Estonian Business and Innovation Agency (Enterprise Estonia) +372 5615 6549 +372 627 9748 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Sepise 7, 11415 Tallinn <http://www.eis.ee/> www.eis.ee From: LIAA Invest <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2024 3:08 PM To: Klienditeenindus <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; Andris Blumbahs <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; Eva Kalniņa <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Inquiry Regarding the Application of EU Regulation 651/2014 and Harmonization of Requirements in the Baltic Region Dear Colleagues, I hope this message finds you well. On behalf of the Investment and Development Agency of Latvia (LIAA), I would like to inquire about the current practices regarding the financial evaluation of company groups and partner enterprises in your country, particularly concerning the application of EU Regulation 651/2014 on the status of undertakings in difficulty. We have identified that EU Member States interpret Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 , which declares certain categories of aid compatible with the internal market in accordance with Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty, in different ways. The document relates to Article 18(2) of the EEA Agreement. In particular, we are interested in understanding how your country applies this regulation when evaluating large international company groups whose subsidiaries apply for support. <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014R0651 > https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014R0651 To ensure a harmonized application of the regulation, we kindly request clarification on the following: 1. What financial information do you require from company groups to ensure that they are not classified as "undertakings in difficulty"? 2. Do you assess related companies, such as other companies owned by the parent company, using the parent company’s consolidated financial statements, or do you require individual financial reports from each company within the group? Additionally, we would appreciate if you could share any relevant materials or guidelines outlining the evaluation principles used in your country. Please feel free to send them in your local language if necessary, as we can arrange for translation. We look forward to receiving your response and learning more about the approaches taken by your institutions in this area. Eva Kalniņa Projektu attīstības nodaļa Investīciju projektu departaments Pērses iela 2, Rīga, LV-1442 Mob. Tālr.: +371 26414932 <http://www.liaa.gov.lv/> liaa.gov.lv latvia.eu See elektronkiri võib sisaldada konfidentsiaalset informatsiooni. Kui antud kiri ei ole suunatud Teile, siis selle avaldamine, kopeerimine, levitamine või muul viisil kasutamine on rangelt keelatud ning võib olla ebaseaduslik. Kui saite selle kirja ekslikult, palun teavitage sellest koheselt kirja saatjat ning kustutage kiri oma süsteemidest. _____ This e-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any other action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your systems.