Draft Port State Control Advice document - for your comment

Tere IHO ENCWG töögrupi ülesanne KO-le täitmiseks ja MOT-ile arvamuse avaldamiseks. Kuna peame vastama hiljemalt 18.08, siis MOT kommentaari sooviks hiljemalt 11.08. Kui MOT-il on täiendavaid küsimusi, siis pöörduda Dana poole. Olavi From: Dana Kuznetsova Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 10:07 AM To: Olavi Heinlo <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Draft Port State Control Advice document - for your comment. Tere! Kas ma saadan kiri registreerimisele ja palun laevade järelevalve osakonnast tagasisidet? Dana From: Tony Pharaoh [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:34 AM To: Argentina <[email protected]>; Alvaro Sanchez <[email protected]>; Brazil <[email protected]>; Brazil <[email protected]>; Brazil <[email protected]>; Brazil <[email protected]>; Canada <[email protected]>; CARIS <[email protected]>; Chile <[email protected]>; Chile <[email protected]>; Eivind Mong Private <[email protected]>; Justin Hornby <[email protected]>; Denmark <[email protected]>; Danish Geodata Agency <[email protected]>; Denmark <[email protected]>; Ecuador <[email protected]>; Egypt <[email protected]>; ESRI <[email protected]>; Dana Kuznetsova <[email protected]>; Finland <[email protected]>; France <[email protected]>; Furuno <[email protected]>; Furuno <[email protected]>; Germany <[email protected]>; Germany <[email protected]>; Tomren Guttorm <[email protected]>; IC-ENC <[email protected]>; IEHG <[email protected]>; Anthony Pharaoh <[email protected]>; Jeff Wootton <[email protected]>; IIC <[email protected]>; India HO <[email protected]>; Antonietta Izzo <[email protected]>; Italy <[email protected]>; Japan <[email protected]>; Navtor <[email protected]>; Bjorn Saestad <[email protected]>; Netherlands <[email protected]>; New Zealand <[email protected]>; Northrop Grumman <[email protected]>; Norway <[email protected]>; Ceri Carter <[email protected]>; Poland <[email protected]>; Portugal <[email protected]>; Primar <[email protected]>; Republic of Korea <[email protected]>; Russian Federation <[email protected]>; SevenCs <[email protected]>; Singapore <[email protected]>; Slovinia <[email protected]>; Sweden <[email protected]>; Transas <[email protected]>; E.GšNSAY <[email protected]>; Ukraine <[email protected]>; UK <[email protected]>; USA - NOAA <[email protected]>; USA - NOAA <[email protected]>; USA - NGA <[email protected]> Subject: Draft Port State Control Advice document - for your comment. Dear colleagues, The ENCWG Chair has requested your feedback and comment on the attached document relating to action 25 from the last (2nd) ENCWG Meeting. The action is to, "Produce text to advise Port State Inspectors (and others) on what will happen on the 31 August, when the PresLib 3.4 Check Data Set will be removed from the IHO web site, and informing on the ECDIS Chart 1 check that may be used to check compliance to S-52 Edition 4.0." As this is not an IHO Standard, you are kindly requested indicate changes directly in the document using Word Track-Changes. Please send your edits/comments to Thomas Mellor ([email protected]) cc to Jeff Wootton ([email protected]) before 18 August (Friday) in order to provide enough time to prepare the final draft for submission to HSSC9. Regards, Tony -- Anthony PHARAOH Assistant Director / Adjoint au Directeur International Hydrographic Organization / Organisation hydrographique internationale 4b Quai Antoine Ier - BP 445 - MC98011 Monaco Cedex - Principauté de Monaco Tel. +377 93 10 81 08 / [email protected] / www.iho.int IHO ENC and ECDIS Information for PSC I nspectors Background The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) have for a number of years now been leading efforts to improve ECDIS usability. This cu lminated in the development of three new editions to IHO ECDIS related standards. The information in this document is provided to assist P ort S tate C ontrol Inspectors by providing information about IHO s tandards covering ENC and ECDIS . IHO S-52 Presentation Library , edition 4.0 C ontrols the graphical display of the ENC in ECDIS, from the symbols and line styles that must be used to depict features right through to the colours that govern the day, dusk and night display modes. S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0 has been u pdated to address excessive ECDIS alarms and other display anomalies . IHO S-63 Data Protection Scheme, edition 1.2 P rotects against Piracy by e ncrypting the ENC information . I t also provides a mechanism for Mariners to licence ENCs from Data Providers ; and provides authentication assurance that the ENC data being loaded into the ECDIS has come from an approved source . S-63 Data Protection Scheme edition 1.2 has been u pdated to include a new Annex specifying how to implement an ENC U pdate S tatus R eport . IHO S-64 Test Data Sets for ECDIS , edition 3.0 Sets of ENCs and Raster charts designed specifically to support ECDIS manufacturers taking systems through the process of type approval against IEC Standard 61174. S-64 Test Data Sets for ECDIS edition 3.0 has been u pdated with new test data sets to ensure the presentation of ENC features displayed in ECDIS is correct. Time Line Regulations Related to ECDIS and ENC SOLAS chapter 5 Regulation 18 4. Systems and equipment installed prior to the adoption of performance standards by the Organization may subsequently be exempted from full compliance with such standards at the discretion of the Administration, having due regard to the recommended criteria adopted by the Organization. However, for an electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) to be accepted as satisfying the chart carriage requirement of regulation 19.2.1.4, that system shall conform to the relevant performance standards not inferior to those adopted by the Organization in effect on the date of installation, or, for systems installed before 1 January 1999, not inferior to the performance standards adopted by the Organization on 23 November 1995 **. ** Recommendation on Performance Standards for Electronic Chart Display and Information Systems (ECDIS) (resolution A.817(19)) . SOLAS chapter 5 Regulation 19 2. Shipborne navigational equipment and systems 2.1 All ships irrespective of size shall have: 2.1.4 nautical charts and nautical publications to plan and display the ship's route for the intended voyage and to plot and monitor positions throughout the voyage. An electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) is also accepted as meeting the chart carriage requirements of this subparagraph. Ships to which paragraph 2.10 applies shall comply with the carriage requirements for ECDIS detailed therein; 2.1.5 back-up arrangements to meet the functional requirements of subparagraph .4, if this function is partly or fully fulfilled by electronic means;* * An appropriate folio of paper nautical charts may be used as a back-up arrangement for ECDIS. Other back-up arrangements for ECDIS are acceptable (see appendix 6 to resolution A.817(19), as amended). SOLAS chapter 5 Regulation 27 Nautical charts and nautical publications, such as sailing directions, lists of lights, notices to mariners, tide tables and all other nautical publications necessary for the intended voyage, shall be adequate and up to date. MSC MSC.1/Circ.1503 ECDIS – Guidance for Good Practice The mandatory carriage of ECDIS, as required by SOLAS regulation V/19.2.10, is subject to a staged entry into force between 1 July 2012 and 1 July 2018. As per SOLAS regulations V/18 and V/19, for a ship to use ECDIS to meet the chart carriage requirements of SOLAS, the ECDIS equipment must conform to the relevant IMO performance standards. ECDIS units on board are required to comply with one of two performance standards (either IMO resolution A.817(19), as amended or resolution MSC.232(82)), depending on the date of their installation. Essentially, where an ECDIS is being used to meet the chart carriage requirements of SOLAS, it must: be type-approved; use up to date electronic nautical charts (ENC); be maintained so as to be compatible with the latest applicable International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) standards; and have adequate, independent back-up arrangements in place. IHO Advice for PSC Inspectors concerning IHO Standards i) be type-approved To ensure ECDIS comply with the requirements in the relevant IMO Performance Standards they are tested against these criteria by approved Notified Bodies. The current testing standard for ECDIS is developed by the International Electrotechnical Commission ( IEC ) and is IEC 61174 edition 4.0 – Maritime navigation and radiocommunication equipment and systems — Electronic chart display and information system (ECDIS) Operational and performance requirements, methods of testing and required test results , publi shed in August 2015. All ECDIS manufactured a fter this date will be tested to ensure they comply with the display requirements in IHO S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0 and IHO S-63 Data Protection Scheme edition 1.2. ECDIS type approved before August 2015 will need to be upgraded to the new IHO Presentation Library 4.0. However there is no requir ement to be updated to IHO S-63 Data Protection Scheme edition 1.2 . The impact of this is that older ECDIS using IHO S-63 1.1 will not be able to display an ENC Status Report from with in the ECDIS. All ECDIS approved within the European Union under the Marine Equipment Directive MED are given a Wheel Mark which is affixed to the equipment. left top The first number denotes the Notified B ody that awarded the type approval ; the second number denotes the year the equipment passed type approval. use up to date electronic nautical charts (ENC); Each week Hydrographic Offices issue updates to their ENCs . F or an ECDIS to be used for navigation it must have the correct up to date ENCs for the intended voyage. There are currently two chart distribution services a mariner can sign up to for delivery of ENCs : Standard subscription - ENC permits are purchased for a known route for a fixed period of time (3, 6, 9 and 12 months) . T his enables the decryption of ENCs in ECDIS and enables their use for planning and navigation. Pay As You Sail (PAYS) – Mariners pay a minimal planning fee for upfront use of the entire global ENC data set. A tracking service is fitted to the vessel and as they navigate across ENCs they are charged accordingly. PAYS services can give instant access to any ENC chart across the globe. To facilitate PSC inspections and to assist mariners in satisfying themselves that their ENC data is “up to date” S-63 was updated to edition 1.2 , adding an additional annex covering the ENC Status Report. Only ECDIS type approved after Aug ust 2015 will be capable of displaying the report. The report is a concise and standardised format designed for two individual use cases: a) To ensure that all ENC cells loaded into the ECDIS SENC are up to date for the next leg of a particular route . b) To ensure that all ENCs loaded into the SENC are up to date. Fig 1. Example ENC Update Status Report If an inspection is carried out on a new ECDIS type approved after August 2015 with this functionality it is important to understand how the ENC Update Status Report works and what the returned values mean. T he top of the report will list vessel name , IMO number and other important data. For the report to work correctly the ECDIS requires a reference date ; this enables the system to calculate if an ENC cell has been updated . The date is taken from the last S-63 SERIAL.ENC file installed in the ECDIS which is delivered as part of the ENC exchange set from a data provider . The data content of each of the header fields is defined in the table below: Name Data Type Description 1. Vessel Name Text The name of the vessel as recorded within the ECDIS. 2. Identifier Text A unique ide ntifier, the MMSI or vessel IMO number. 3. ENC Update reference date Date The dat e used as the reference for the status of each of the cells. This is the date stamp of the last data server’s service media used to update the SENC. The date is taken from the S-63 SERIAL.ENC, expressed both in standard notation “NN MMM YYYY” and week number as defined in S-63 . 4. Date of report Date The date the report was run. 5. Content Text This field denotes the content type of the report. There are two possibilities: “Filtered for Route Plan XXX to YYY” where XXX and YYY are the textual names of the point of origin and destination on the chosen route. Full SENC contents. 6. Start WP Text This field is only present if the report is filtered for a route. It should comprise the textual name of the starting waypoint of the route (if one exists) and the lat/lon coordinates of the waypoint. There is no fixed form that the coordinates should take. 7. End WP Text This field is only present if the report is filtered for a route. It should comprise the textual name of the last waypoint of the route (if one exists) and its lat/lon coordinates. There is no fixed form that the coordinates should take. All the cells along an intended route are checked against the last ENC update reference date within the ECDIS . T he ENC cells are then given a status . T he description of each status type is given below; ENC Update ‘Status’ Description Up to date The ECDIS h as all the latest update and/or new edition information for t he cell installed as defined by the latest PRODUCTS.TXT data. NOTE: The ENC Update reference date must be withi n the last four weeks from the time of the report execution or the cell shall be displayed as “Not up to date” regardl ess of its status as defined by the PRODUCTS.TXT data. Not Up to date The ECDIS does NOT have all the latest update and/or new edition information for the cell installed . Again, the reference point for what should be installed is defined by the ENC Update reference date NOTE: If the reference dat e is older than four weeks then cells shall be displayed as “not up to date” by definition. Withdrawn The number of cells which have been withdrawn by the data server or cancelled but which are still available within the ECDIS . Unknown Cells for which a stat us cannot be determined for any reason. If cells from a dataset with a “PARTIAL” PRODUCTS.TXT file are loaded then all cells in a data server’s service but not included in the partial PRODUCTS.TXT shall be deemed to be “Unknown” as no definitive information on them can be determined. A “FULL” PRODUCTS.TXT content is re quired to specify the status of all cells in a data server’s service. be maintained so as to be compatible with the latest applicable International Hydrographic O rganization (IHO) standards All ECDIS have a function to display the current edition of the IHO Presentation Library being used to display the ENCs. The new IHO ECDIS Presentation Library edition 4.0 clause 19.1 states ‘The edition number of the PresLib installed must be available to the Mariner on request’. This requirement is thefore tested for in ECDIS type approval – IEC 61174 edition 4 .0 clause 5.5.1 , Presentation L ibrary (S-52/Annex A, Part I/19.1) states ‘t he edition number of the IHO Pr es entation Lib rary installed shall be available to the Mariner on request ’ . In Oct ober 2011 the IHO issued the ENC /ECDIS Presentation and Performance Checks (DPPC) – two fictitious ENC cells intended to assist mariners identifying if their ECDIS was using the latest IHO Presentation Library, at that time edition 3.4. The tests also highlight if there were any ENC display anomalies present in the ECDIS . Mariners were required to run a series of quick visual checks using the datasets within the ECDIS to ascertain if they were experiencing display issues. If the system was found to be running an old IHO Presentation Library or had a more serious display anomaly Mariners were advised to contact their ECDIS manufacturer or an appropriate equipment maintenance company to obtain the relevant software patches and investigate further to resolve the issues. Results of the ECDIS tests were sent to the IHO for use in revising IHO standards. In direct response to the information received from Mariners through the DPPC the IHO issued S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0 in September 2014. The DPPC will be withdrawn from circulation on 31 st August 2017 when the IHO S-52 Presentation Library edition 3.4 is retired. For Mariners that upgrade their ECDIS to the new IHO S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0 and require a method to check that their ECDIS is capable of displaying the new symbols introduced in IHO S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0 , the recommended course of action is to use ECDIS Chart 1 . Magenta ‘d’ symbol used on ENC features that have a date dependent attribute populated. Indication h ighlight symbology for objects that pose a danger to the vessel. . Automatic update symbology for identifying where changes to the ENCs have occurred. Fig 2. New ECDIS symbols introduced in IHO S-52 Presentation library edition 4.0 There is no intention for the IHO to issue a new DPPC data set for IHO Presentation Library edition 4.0. The IHO maintains a list of the current IHO standards enforce on their website https://www.iho.int Instructions on how to use ECDIS chart 1 to check the IHO S-52 Presentation library edition 4.0 are also available here. iv) have adequate, independent back-up arrangements in place. Details of a ship’s navigational systems and equipment must be recorded in the “Record of Equipment” . The means of complying with SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19 needs to be indicated (i.e. paper charts and/or ECDIS) in the relevant “Record of Equipment”. Declaring ECDIS in the ship’s “Record of Equipment” makes ECDIS a surveyable item under SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19 . The IMO performance standards for ECDIS require that adequate back-up arrangements should be provided to ensure safe navigation, in case of an ECDIS failure : • Paper charts • Two independent IMO compliant ECDIS units • One IMO compliant ECDIS unit and one set of paper chart s • One IMO compliant ECDIS unit and Chart Radar - ECDIS PS standard back up