Kiri

Total budget NB! Read the instructions before completing the budget form. The budget must be in DKK and must be attached as an appendix to the project description. Text may be entered in the grey fields. Add rows as needed – but make sure the codes in the spreadsheet still work properly. DINA case number (to be completed by the Nordic Council of Ministers): Project title: Date the budget form was completed: Nordic Council of Ministers’ funding Self-funding Total financing Total amount (DKK) Total amount (DKK) Total amount (DKK) 1. Project implementation 9.615.000 - 9.615.000 1.1 Fees to experts, etc., salaries to project staff 8.760.000 8.760.000 1.2 Travel expenses 460.000 460.000 1.3 Subsistence expenses 60.000 60.000 1.4 Meeting expenses 60.000 60.000 1.5 Other expenses 275.000 275.000 2. Communication (print, layout, website, etc.) 690.000 - 690.000 2.1 Information about the project, e.g. for stakeholders, target audience, etc. 230.000 230.000 2.2 Communication of results (publications etc.) 460.000 460.000 2.3 Other expenses - 3. External evaluation (only if relevant, see instructions) - - - 3.1 Fees for consultancies/agencies - 3.2 Misc. expenses - 4. Contingencies (min. 6%, max. 10% of budget lines 1–3) 600.000 - 600.000 4.1 Unforeseen expenses 600.000 600.000 5. Total project costs 10.905.000 - 10.905.000 6. Auditing (only if relevant, see instructions) - - - 6.1 Auditing - 7. Subtotal 10.905.000 - 10.905.000 8. Overheads (only in special cases, see instructions) - - - 8.1 Overheads - 9. Total 10.905.000 - 10.905.000  Contact persons and organisations for the project Nordic - Baltic Marine Spacial Management Tool , provided by project manager Njål Tengs-Hagir, Kartver ket/Norwegian Mapping Authority Jens Peter Weiss Hartmann Geodatastyrelsen Denmark Thierry Schmitt EMODNet EMODNet Ött Kyysmaa Transpordiamet Estonia Juha Tiihonen Traficom Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Finland Jonathan Pritchard IIC Technologies IIC Árni Þór Vésteinsson Landhelgisgæsla Íslands Iceland Aigars Gailis Latvijas Jüras Adminiisträcija Latvia Mindaugas Za k arauskas Lietuvos transporto saugos administracija Lithuania Trevor Taylor Open Geospatial Consortium OGC Marek Mikłaszewski BIURO HYDROGRAFICZNE MARYNARKI WOJENNEJ Poland Magnus Wallhagen Sjöfartsverket Sweden Florent Nicolas Helcom secretariat Joni Kaitaranta Helcom secretariat Liene Gaujeniete VASAB secretariat North Sea-Baltic Sea Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure Working Group Denmark is Chair IHO-EU Network Group France is Chair Nordic Hydrographic Commission Norway is Chair North Sea Hydrographic Commission Iceland is Chair Baltic Sea Hydrographic Commision Sweden is Chair Arctic Region Hydrographic Commission Canada is Chair Arctic-SDI Russia is Chair INSPIRE network A real example from the Marine Spatial Management Tool – Norwegian data is used, they are live-streamed from national agencies. The process shown is simplified for demonstration value only. Simplified semantics: Ditribution of natural resources + commercial activities on the natural resources + state of the environment = knowledge base on which to create plans and regulations One important natural resource is oil and gas (red fields below). Another natural resouce is fish – Sand lance is a small fish that lives on sandy sea bottoms. It is an important species in the food-chain. The orange fields below shows their spawning grounds. They are sensitive for noise and dig into the sand and die if exposed to high levels of noise. If we zoom in, we can see a conflict of interest. There are oil and gas discoveries in a spawning ground for Sand lance. We can look at human activity in the area and find that there are oil installations, pipelines, cables etc in the spawning grounds If we click on an area in the map, we get a dialogue box showing available data. Below is data on the oil and gas discoveries and spawning grounds If we click on an entry in the previous box, we get more information on the data and a link to the data owners fact pages By clicking the link we get to the data item on the national agency’s own system. Below is the fact pages from Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. This ensures data transparency and ensures that the data is authoritative We can also click the link for the national agency’s Metadata Then we are transported to the national geoportal in Norway: Geonorge.no where we find information on the live-stream data from the national agency. Areas of use, distribution, ownership of data, ownership of the service, geographical area etc etc. This furher ensures data transparency and makes the data authoritative. We also see contact information, quality, license for usage (in all cases they are open data), who to contact in case of problems and also how often the service is updated (in this case daily) Since Sand lance is a valuable species in the food-chain, we need to see if the spawning ground is categorized as a valuable marine area If we click in the area, we get a new entry in the dialogue box When clicking the entry, we find more information on the valuable marine area with a link to the Marine Management Plan from the Norwegian government By clicking the link, we are transported to Government.no and the Marine Management Plan. This ensures that the data are transparent and reliable (authoritative) Since we have a Marine Management Plan in the area, then the petroleum industry should have a restriction of the exploitation in the area By clicking the area, we notice new entries in the dialogue box By clicking the entry we get more information on the data and a link to the Integrated Ocean Management Plan at government.no We are transported to government.no and the Integrated Ocean Management Plan where the restriction on the petroleum industry is described Summary • The examples used shows a classical challenge in the marine environment: we have two (or more) conflicting interests in the same area. • By combining real-time, live-streamed data from seven national agencies + official government information we have identified the conflict, created a marine valuable area and created a restriction for the petroleum industry. The restriction is not a ban but ensures that any noise occurs outside the time of spawning which means that spawning areas and exploitation of petrochemicals can co-exist. • We have also shown tracability of all the data used from the map client and all the way back to the national data owner and also to the national geoportal. This gives total data transparency and ensures that the data is authoritative. Geospatial statistics: By selecting Analysis we can run analysis on the real-time data from the national agencies. Below we’ll show Fish catch statistics. Notice the time-slider that shows we have historical data available. The map shows a heat map of fish catch, the redder areas shows higher intensity We draw a polygon on the map (or select a pre-defined area, for instance the North Sea or the Barents Sea) and click the button Create report The pop-up shows the fish catch within the polygon on the map in tonnes By clicking on the other years on the pop-up, we include the statistics in our figure. We can download the data if we want to We can filter the results as well. For instance on certain fishing equipment or specific fish species And now we see that the statistics has changed according to our choices in the filtering Summary • The geospatial statistics example shows us (in this example) the fish catch statistics over the last ten years as a live-stream from the national agency. Data transparency and authoritativeness are in place as we can follow the data back to the origin in the national agency and in the national geoportal. • We can compare the yearly catch and look for negative or positive trends. • If the catch is decreasing, we can combine the data with AIS data to see if the vessels has increased in size, if there are more vessels fishing in the area now than previously or if they use different fishing equipment now than previously. We can then create restrictions on for instance vessel size, equipment, tonnage or even specific fish species and monitor our decisions in the future.  D eres ref.: Vår ref. Njål Tengs-Hagir Dato: 18.01.2022 Sak/dok.: Project proposal Nordic/Baltic Marine Spatial Management Tool Ark.: 22-10 High level p roject proposal; Nordic -Baltic Marine Spatial Management Tool (MSMT) This proposal aims to establish a Nordic-Baltic Marine Spatial Management Tool in order to create marine spatial plans and marine resource plans on a basin level. Marine resources, environmental challenges and the effects of climate changes knows no boundaries and move freely across country borders and as such it is of vital importance that we manage our ocean basins together. Background In 2014, the European Commission agreed upon the importance of marine spatial plans (MSP) and urged all member nations to create MSP’s that also took into consideration neighbouring countries. 2892755 4973980 The United Nations General Assembly has proclaimed that the decade from 2021 to 2030 will be the United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development. Achieving the 17 sustainable development goals is the most important driving force behind the initiative. T he High-level Panel for a Sustainable Ocean Economy , consisting of 1 4 sitting Heads of State and Government , presented a new ocean action agenda in December 2020. Th is agenda shows that it is a matter of urgency to develop a holistic approach to ocean management across the globe in order to achieve the environmental, economic and social goals set in the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. All the Nordic and Baltic nations are organized differently with regards to ocean management. H owever , they all have governmental ownership to the data that makes up the contents of marine spatial plans, and there are several cross-national working groups in place within Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) for the sharing of data in a harmonized way . The Nordics and Baltic states have several challenges ahead: sea level rise, ocean deoxygenation (hypoxic zones), low catches of marine resources, invading species, depletion in water, harmful algae bloom etc. But there are also several opportunities , such as carbon sequestration, carbon dioxide removal, ecosystem based marine spatial planning, monitoring, ecosystem based marine resource management, reintroduc tion of marine ecosystems etc. Project proposal The marine natural resources knows no national boundaries, they migrate or move freely across national borders. The marine environmental challenges knows no national borders either. If we are to utilize our marine resources sustainably as well as protecting and improving the environment, we need to cooperate as nations on managing our common sea basins . The project proposal is buildt on the back of the experiences Norway has gained through our work on a Marine Spatial Management Tool and Marine Spatial Data Infrastructure. As part of its marine spatial data infrastructure , Norway has engaged in Marine Spatial Planning for more than 15 years. As the need for marine geospatial information grew, Norway initiated the development of the Norwegian Marine Spatial Management Tool. The goal of the Tool was to support the planning process with updated and reliable geospatial information. The Tool now utilizes datasets from eleven government agencies and research institutes and standardized network-based services to enable real-time use of geospatial data. The goal of the Nordic-Baltic MSMT-project is to translate and make this tool freely available, and to integrate the tool with data from all the Nordic-Baltic countries and regions. The pro ject will reuse the open-source technolog y solution developed for Marine Spatial Management in Norway . By including data from the other Nordic/Baltic countries , we will demonstrate that although the power lies within the data, the real magic happens when we combine the national data and create an authoritative knowledge base for responsible decision-making on a sea basin level. Organisation and cooperation All nations have national agencies responsible for marine geodata (marine data that has a coordinate associated with it) and a responsibility for sharing this data for national and international use. The project will establish a project group to explore the national roles, user needs and available data content. The project group should ideally be composed of representatives of national institutions tasked with furthering and implementing digitalisation policies in the marine area. Data content and user stories We propose to identify minimum two use -cases which are relevant for all the countries in the Nordic/Baltic region . For these use-cases we will identify national data owners, assess the usability and contents of the data and provide an analysis of whether the data is fit-for-purpose . Where not, we will provide a GAP analysis with recommendations , so that the data owners may make the necessary adjustments in order for the data to be included in the solution. All EU/EEA members already share much of their marine data through initiatives such as EMODNet, Helcom-Vasab, EURO-GOOS, Ospar etc. The project will explore to what extent these data may be included directly in the solution. Technology and tools: P rototype/beta-version of a Nordic-Baltic MSMT Based on the existing Norwegian solution, the project will create a prototype/beta version of a Nordic-Baltic MSMT. The solution will be in English, and open to all. By harmonizing the cartography the marine spatial management plans will be uniform and easy to understand for all. Where possible, the prototype will include geospatial statistics. The illustration is from the Norwegian MSMT and shows fish catch statistics for the polygon marked on the map . The solution can also display historical data where they are relevant. The prototype will re-use services in a cross border setting on a sea basin level. The illustration shows real examples from the Norwegian MSMT, where services from the UK and Denmark have been included and combined with the Norwegian data. How much data will be available in the final p rototype, will depend on how many data-streams th at can be identified -and if necessary adapted – and included within the proposed time-frame of three years. Overview of activities Activity Purpose Tasks Result Establish Project group Shared understanding of the a im of project Identify participants from relevant national agencies Plan and execute kick-off meeting in person Kick-off meeting Established points of contact at national level. Map competence requirements per r ole Shared understanding of the r oles, functions and mandates share information on areas of responsibility at national level share content and status on Marine spatia l data infrastructure identify (dis)similarities between different national agencies. Shared understanding on the competence and resources required per role. Shared understanding of co-dependencies between roles Shared understanding, knowledge exchange o n different national models, which may feed back in to national deliberations Identify use-cases Find common use-cases share use -cases Identify (dis)similarities between different nations Identify and prioritise use-cases for the prototype Model minimum two use cases Shared understanding, knowledge exchange o n different national models, which may feed back in to national deliberations. Report on use-cases Identify necessary data and data owners Gain access to data needed for the use-cases Analyse what data are available through existing European and international initiatives Identify other national data sources and data owners Establish contact with data owners Overview of data and sources/owners GAP analysis Identify the gaps in data maturity vs. user needs and user-stories Analyse if data is fit for purpose Make recommendations in order to make data fit for purpose and communicate this to data owners Report on data with gap analyses. Prototype Create a working prototype Translate and adapt existing Norwegian solution Integrate Nordic-Baltic data sets from identified use cases If possible – integrate other data sets that have been identified and are fit for purpose Working prototype in English that includes prioritized use -cases Continuous improvement of data as the previous tasks improve the marine spatial data infrastructure and data content Project management Execution of project plan. Organize meetings Facilitate information sharing Run demonstrations of prototype Document results Final report on activities The project period is three years. The proposed budget is DKK 10 905 000 for the whole period. Maa-amet [email protected] Meie 29.12.2022 nr 15-6/10244-1 Osalemine projektis "Nordic-Baltic Marine Spatial Management Tool" Austatud mereala planeeringu alusandmete valdajad ja kooskõlastajad. Rahandusministeeriumile on esitatud info Põhjamaade Nõukogu poolt rahastatud ja Statens kartverk poolt korraldatavast projektist „Nordic-Baltic Marine Spatial Management Tool“. Projekti eesmärgiks on analüüsida, millised andmed on sobilikud mereala planeerimiseks selliselt, et andmed oleksid riikide vahel harmoniseeritud ja oleks võimalik saada infot kogu valgala kohta. Manusena on lisatud projekti ettepaneku materjalid, mis kinnitati sellel sügisel. Järgmine kohtumine projekti raames toimub töötoana 23.–24.01.2023 Kopenhaagenis. Töötoa teemadeks on merekaitsealad ja kalanduse korraldamine. Töötoas osalemisel kompenseeritakse transpordile ja majutusele tehtavad kulud kuni 500 euro ulatuses. Palun teilt hiljemalt 06.01.2023 infot, kas plaanite projektis osaleda. Juhul, kui plaanite projektis osaleda palume teil esitada omapoolne kontaktisik projektis. Lugupidamisega (allkirjastatud digitaalselt) Mart Uusjärv kohalike omavalitsuste poliitika osakonna juhataja regionaalvaldkonna asekantsleri ülesannetes Lisa(d): NBSMT.zip Taavi Pipar 611 3223 [email protected] Suur-Ameerika 1 / 10122 Tallinn / 611 3558 / [email protected] / www.rahandusministeerium.ee registrikood 70000272 Lisaadressaadid: Transpordiamet Maaeluministeerium Keskkonnaministeerium Keskkonnaamet Kultuuriministeerium Muinsuskaitseamet Kaitseministeerium Elering AS Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium 2