Kiri

Saatja: BERNOVILLE Gabrielle <[email protected]> Saadetud: 21.11.2022 12:36 Teema: Information message - European Commission - Revision of the EU's Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) Tähtsus: Kõrgeim Manused: image003.png; image001.png Dear EHL National Coordinators We have been notified that our Commission colleagues in DG ENERGY are collecting information on how many buildings could be exempt from the Minimum Energy Performance Standards under Art 9(5) of the EPBD proposal (see hereafter). Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] In the framework of the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD, the EU's main legislative instrument aiming to promote the improvement of the energy performance of buildings within the European Union), our Commission colleagues in DG ENER are requesting information to detect an approximate number of buildings that would be exempt from the minimum energy performance standards under article 9(5) of the EPBD proposal, as follows: 5. Member States may decide not to apply the minimum energy performance standards referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the following categories of buildings: (a) buildings officially protected as part of a designated environment or because of their special architectural or historical merit, in so far as compliance with the standards would unacceptably alter their character or appearance; (b) buildings used as places of worship and for religious activities; (c) temporary buildings with a time of use of two years or less, industrial sites, workshops and non- residential agricultural buildings with low energy demand and non-residential agricultural buildings which are used by a sector covered by a national sectoral agreement on energy performance; (d) residential buildings which are used or intended to be used for either less than four months of the year or, alternatively, for a limited annual time of use and with an expected energy consumption of less than 25 % of what would be the result of all-year use; (e) stand-alone buildings with a total useful floor area of less than 50 m2. In this regard, we are kindly calling on you to collect the following information: - number of buildings with a special architectural merit at national level, - their approximate share in the building stock, - any other indicators that could be of use in this regard. We have data at our disposal collected in the context of the Renovation Wave. The current objective, however, is to have more structured information by Member States. Apologies for the tight timeframe which is due to ongoing discussions on this specific issue. A similar request was sent to the Commission’s expert group on cultural heritage In case of further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. With kind regards, Gabrielle Bernoville On behalf of the European Heritage Label Team Gabrielle Bernoville European Commission DG EAC - Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Unit D2 Creative Europe J-70 02/004 +33 645 079 701 +32 2 29 85104 B-1049 Brussels/Belgium [email protected] Creative Europe programme European Heritage Label – Europe starts here! Saatja: Veronika Valk-Siska <[email protected]> Saaja: Liina Jänes Teema: Fwd: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Begin forwarded message: From: Veronika Valk <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Date: 22. November 2022 at 20:15:20 EET To: Merilin Piipuu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Tuhat tänu, armas Merilin! Sellest on väga palju abi, vastasin Juttale nii: Dear Jutta Thank you for your inquiry. Regarding Estonia, we can offer the following numbers: In terms of the number of buildings with a special architectural merit at national level, there are 3088 architectural monuments* + 4299 buildings in heritage conservation areas. Unfortunately, we do not know the number of buildings in environmental protection areas, and it is not possible to get it anywhere so quickly at the moment. In parallel, there are 141,000 buildings (54 million m2) awaiting reconstruction within 30 years. Thus, the approximate share of architectural monuments (buildings) in the existing building stock subject to the Renovation Wave is 0,05%. I hope this answers your question. Please do not hesitate to ask for further information, as necessary. Best regards Veronika * the 'number of buildings' is taken from the Building Register by type of building, because we also have items that are not defined as buildings but are protected as architectural monuments. There are actually a total of 5269 architectural monuments, but they also include shelters, parks, fences, etc. Veronika Valk-Siska, PhD Head of Housing Policy +372 551 5153 | [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications Suur-Ameerika 1 | 10122 Tallinn, Estonia On 21. Nov 2022, at 17:05, Merilin Piipuu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Mirjam Rääbis <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: FW: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Date: 21. November 2022 at 16:22:49 EET To: Merilin Piipuu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: Carolin Pihlap <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, Andres Kimber <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Hei! Andres aitas vastused leida. Hoonetest ehitismälestisi on 3088 + hooneid muinsuskaitsealadel on 4299. Miljööaladel olevate hoonete arvu me kahjuks ei tea ning seda pole võimalik ka hetkel kusagilt nii kiiresti saada. PS! Hoonete arv on võetud Ehitisregistrist liik hoone järgi, sest meil on ehitismälestisena kaitse all ka asju mis pole hooned tegelikult. Ehitismälestisi on tegelikult kokku 5269, aga sinna alla kuuluvad ka vared, varjendid, pargid, piirdeaiad jms. Mirjam From: Carolin Pihlap <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2022 11:34 AM To: Mirjam Rääbis <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: FW: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Põhimõtteliselt on vaja kaitsealuste hoonete arvu ehk mälestised + muinsuskaitsealade hooned. Lisaks siis ka miljööväärtuslikud hooned, kus on ka piirangud välisilme muutmisele, aga mis on kohalike omavalituste hallata ja nende arvu me ei tea. Ma ei tea, kas Kaisil on need andmed või siis Andres saaks registrist võtta? C From: Merilin Piipuu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2022 4:45 PM To: Carolin Pihlap <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Fwd: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Tsau! Äkki sa oskad vastata. Tänud ette! M. Begin forwarded message: From: Veronika Valk-Siska <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Fwd: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Date: 20. November 2022 at 13:13:04 EET To: Liina Jänes <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, Mihkel Kaevats <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, Merilin Piipuu <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Hei, põrgatan selle küsimuse teile edasi, on meil need numbrid kuskil olemas? Tervitab Veronika Begin forwarded message: From: KASTNER Jutta <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] Date: 18. November 2022 at 18:10:08 CET To: "Schultheiss, Jan (BMWSB, SW III 5)" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "AT - Heidemarie MEISSNITZER" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, FR - Aline DENIS <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, LU - Claudine HEMMER <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> " <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: BAEKE Florence <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >, Veronika Valk-Siska <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Dear members of the OMC group, Our Commission colleagues in DG ENERGY are collecting information on how many buildings could be exempt from the Minimum Energy Performance Standards under Art 9(5) of the EPBD proposal (see hereafter). Revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD): request for information [European Commission] In the framework of the revision of the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD, the EU's main legislative instrument aiming to promote the improvement of the energy performance of buildings within the European Union), our Commission colleagues in DG ENER are requesting information to detect an approximate number of buildings that would be exempt from the minimum energy performance standards under article 9(5) of the EPBD proposal, as follows: 5. Member States may decide not to apply the minimum energy performance standards referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 to the following categories of buildings: (a) buildings officially protected as part of a designated environment or because of their special architectural or historical merit, in so far as compliance with the standards would unacceptably alter their character or appearance; (b) buildings used as places of worship and for religious activities; (c) temporary buildings with a time of use of two years or less, industrial sites, workshops and non-residential agricultural buildings with low energy demand and non-residential agricultural buildings which are used by a sector covered by a national sectoral agreement on energy performance; (d) residential buildings which are used or intended to be used for either less than four months of the year or, alternatively, for a limited annual time of use and with an expected energy consumption of less than 25 % of what would be the result of all-year use; (e) stand-alone buildings with a total useful floor area of less than 50 m2. In this regard, we would be grateful if you could – if possible and as far as available to you –provide us with the following information: - number of buildings with a special architectural merit at national level, - their approximate share in the building stock, - any other indicators that could be of use in this regard. We have data at our disposal collected in the context of the Renovation Wave. The current objective, however, is to have more structured information by Member States. Apologies for the tight timeframe which is due to ongoing discussions on this specific issue. A similar request was sent to the Commission’s expert group on cultural heritage (see attached). In case of further information, please do not hesitate to contact me. With kind regards, Jutta Kastner JUTTA KASTNER Policy Officer <image001.jpg> European Commission Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture Unit D.2 – Creative Europe J-70 02/004 B-1049 Brussels/Belgium +32 2 299 18 64 [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Creative Europe 2021-2027 <https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/creative-europe/node_en> Supporting Europe’s Cultural and Creative sectors ________________________________ Käesolev e-kiri võib sisaldada asutusesiseseks kasutamiseks tunnistatud teavet. Kui te ei ole selle kirja adressaat, palun võtke ühendust saatjaga ning kustutage e-kiri arvutist. This e-mail may contain information which is classified for internal use. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message.