Kiri

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL Artificial i ntelligence (AI) offers great opportunities for society, the environment and the economy. At the same time, depending on the circumstances regarding its specific application and use, certain AI may cause material or immaterial harm and may generate risks to public interests and individuals’ fundamental rights and freedoms . A coherent legal framework for AI, protecting such public interests and fundamental rights, while fostering trust and innovation, is therefore crucial to address ing those challenges and mak ing use of AI’s potential. In April 2021, the European Commission propose d a comprehensive r egulation on AI that would harmonise the rules for AI systems in all 27 EU Member States . The European Parliament and the Council are currently negotiat ing the proposal in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. Various international organisations, including the Council of Europe, have also stepped up their efforts in this field, recognising the cross-border nature of AI and the need f or international cooperation to address the common challenges. Towards a Council of Europe c onvention on a rtificial i ntelligence, h uman r ights, d emocracy and the r ule of l aw On 11 September 2019, the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers decided to set up an Ad hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI) . Its task was to examine the feasibility and potential elements of a legal framework on the development, design and application of AI, while taking into account the Council of Europe’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law as well as relevant existing international legal instruments . CAHAI’s work was based on a feasibility study and a multi-stakeholder consultation carried out in the s pring of 2021 . On 3 December 2021 , CAHAI completed its task , producing an outcome document that identified the possible elements of such a legal framework. According to the document, a legal instrument containing fundamental principles of protection of human dignity and the respect for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law is necessary for the development, design and application of AI systems. Th e instrument should provide for the establishment of a methodology for risk classification of AI systems, featuring the categories ‘ low risk ’ , ‘ high risk ’ and ‘ unacceptable risk ’ . AI a pplications present ing ‘ unacceptable ’ risks should be banned . In order to avoid unjustified bias, a provision on respect for equal treatment and non-discrimination should be included. Legal safeguards should guarantee at least the right to an effective remedy before a national authority, the right to be informed about the application of an AI system in a decision-making process, the right to choose interaction with a human, and the right to know that one is interacting with an AI system. However, specific issues like the manipulation of content ( ‘ deep fakes ’ ) should be dealt with in other sectoral instruments. A requirement to set up compliance mechanisms and national supervisory authorities should be considered. A non-binding impact assessment model could complement the legal instrument. A successor to CAHAI – the Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) – was set up for the period 2022-2024. According to its terms of reference , the CAI is instructed to set up an international negotiation process to develop a legal framework on the development, design and application of AI . The framework should be based on Council of Europe standards of human rights, democracy and rule of law, and should be conducive to innovation. The framework is to be drafted by 15 November 2023 and finalised by the time the CAI is w ound up in 2024 . In fulfilment of its terms of reference, the CAI should coordinate its work with other intergovernmental committees and Council of Europe entities, base its work on strong evidence and an inclusive consultation process, including with international and supranational partners, and take acc ount of the CAHAI outcome document. On 4-6 April 2022, the CAI held its inaugural meeting where a c hair, v ice-Chair and b ureau were elected. On 30 June 2022, the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers instructed the CAI ‘ to proceed speedily with the elaboration of a legally binding instrument of a transversal nature ( ‘ convention ’ / ‘ framework convention ’ ) on artificial intelligence based on the Council of Europe’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, in line with its terms of reference, focused on general common principles, conducive to innovation, and open to participation by non-member States, while taking into account other relevant existing international legal frameworks or those under development ’ . Subsequently, the Chair of the CAI circulated a 'z ero d raft ' of the future (framework) convention which lays down fundamental principles and rules aimed at ensuring that the design, development and application of AI systems are consistent with respect for human rights, the functioning of democracy and the observance of the rule of law. The future (framework) convention will have to be implemented in the respective jurisdictions of the Parties. The scope covers both public and private providers and users of AI systems, but excludes AI systems relating to national defence. The zero draft proposes to include the following provisions: p urpose and scope of the (framework) convention; definitions for an AI system, lifecycle, provider, user and ‘ AI subject ’ ; certain fundamental principles, including proce dural safeguards and rights for AI subjects that would apply to all AI systems, irrespective of their level of risk; additional measures for the pu blic sector as well as AI systems posing ‘unacceptable’ and ‘significant’ levels of risk identified on the basis of a risk and impact assessment methodology ( to be set out later in an a nnex to the convention ) ; follow-up and cooperation mechanism between the p arties; final provisions, including a possibility for EU Member States to apply E U law in their mutual relations for matters covered by the convention and a possibility for the U nion to accede to the convention. The zero draft will be discussed at CAI p lenary sessions in Strasbourg planned for 21 23 September and 23-25 November 2022. Four meetings are also scheduled in 2023 and one meeting in 2024. • Reasons for and objectives of the proposal This recommendation for a decision is submitted to the Council pursuant to Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ( TFEU ) . The decision would authoris e the open ing of negotiations on behalf of the Union for a future Council of Europe convention on AI, human rights, democracy and the rule of law, to adopt negotiating directives and to nominate the Commission as the Union negotiator. Article 3(2) TFEU provides that the Union has exclusive competence ‘ for the conclusion of an international agreement … in so far as its conclusion may affect common rules or alter their scope. ’ An international agreement may affect common rules or alter their scope where the area covered by the agreement overlaps with or is covered to a large extent by Union law . In this regard, E U law provides for a comprehensive set of common single market rules for products and services for which AI systems can be used . Furthermore, t he development and use of certain AI systems may affect the exercise of fundamental rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and secondary EU legislation, including , for example, the right to physical and mental integrity , protection of personal data , privacy , non-discrimination , freedom of expression and information , the presumption of innocence , fair trial and effective remedy . Such development and use may also affect the values on which the Union is based, including human dignity, democracy and the ru le of law . Moreover, t o assess whether an area is largely covered by E U law, account must be taken not only of E U law as it currently stands in the area concerned, but also of its future development, in so far as that is foreseeable at the time of that analysis . The area covered by the future Council of Europe convention on AI is of direct relevance to such foreseeable future develo pments , taki ng into account the Commission proposal for a r egulation on AI (‘the AI a ct’) , presented in April 2021 and currently being negotiated by the European Parliament and t he Council . N egotiations for the future Council of Europe (framework) convention on AI do relate to matters of Union competence and there is a very significant overlap between the zero draft convention and of the proposed AI a ct in terms of their of the scope, nature and content . In view of this, i t is important that the negotiations are conducted on behalf of the Union in such a way as to ensure that the consistency and uniformity of the EU rules for AI and the proper functioning of the system they establish are not undermined and that the future Council of Europe convention is fully consistent with existing and future E U law in the area . • Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area On 21 April 2021, the Commission proposed a r egulation laying down harmonised rules on the placing on the market, putting into service and use of AI systems in the Union. The proposal has the twin objective of creating a single market to promote the development and uptake of AI, while addressing risks to safety, health and fundamental rights. The proposal is of a horizontal nature applicable to providers and users of AI systems, regardless of whether they are public or private entities. AI systems developed or used exclusively for military purposes are excluded from the scope. The proposal lays down proportionate requirements and obligations limited to the minimum required to address risks to health, safety and fundamental rights, without hindering AI technological development or disproportionately increasing financial and administrative burden s on operators. For this purpose, it follows a risk-based approach classifying AI systems into different categories, namely ‘ unacceptable ’ , ‘ high ’ , ‘ transparency-related ’ and ‘ low ’ or ‘ minimal ’ risk. A ban is proposed for AI system s considered to be incompatible with E U values and a clear threat to the safety, livelihood or rights of people, posing an ‘ unacceptable risk ’ (e.g. social scoring by public authorities, harmful manipulative AI practices, real-time remote biometric identification for law - enforcement purposes in publicly accessible spaces , subject to some limited exceptions). ‘ High-risk ’ AI systems posing significant risks to health, safety or fundamental rights must undergo conformity checks and comply with certain mandatory requirements (e.g. in relation to risk management, data quality, documentation, transparency, human oversight, accuracy, cybersecurity) before those systems can be placed on the market or used in the Union. Proportionate and effective monitoring and oversight obligations are also placed on providers and users, clearly defining their roles and responsibilities across the value chain without affecting other obligations under sectoral legislation. For AI systems posing a ‘ transparency-related risk ’ , people should be informed when they are interacting with or being exposed to such systems (e.g. chatbot s , emotion recognition and biometric categorisation systems, deep fakes). All other systems that pose ‘ minimal ’ or ‘ low risk ’ to health, safety and fundamental rights are permitted without further restrictions, but providers can choose to comply with voluntary codes of conduct. The proposal is being discussed by the Council and the European Parliament in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure. The negotiations on the future Council of Europe convention on AI, human rights, democracy and the rule of law should ensure that the agreed provisions are compatible with E U law and Member States’ obligations under it, taking account of its future development and the proposed AI a ct. I t will also be necessary to ensure that the Council of Europe convention include s a disconnection clause allowing the EU Member States that become Parties to the convention to regulate relations among themselves on the basis of E U law. The proposed AI a ct, as it evolves in the legislative procedure and negotiations by the co-legislators and eventually in its final (adopted) form, should be preserved amongst the EU Member States. The European Union should also be able to accede to the convention as a party. • Consistency with other Union policies The recommendation is relevant for other ongoing or planned Commission initiatives that aim to address problems posed by the development and use of AI systems , identified in the White Paper on AI . These other initiatives include revision of sectoral product legislation (e.g. the Machinery Directive , the General Product Safety Directive ) and upcoming initiatives that address liability issues related to new technologies, including AI systems. The recommendation is also co nsistent with the Commission’s overall digital strategy aimed at promoting technology that works for people, one of the three key objectives in the policy vision set out in the Communication ‘Shaping Europe ’ s digital future’ . It aims to ensure AI is developed in ways that respect human rights and earn people’s trust, making Europe fit for the digital age and turning the next 10 years into the Digital Decade ' . The proposed recommendation also significantly strengthens the Union’s role in shaping global norms and standards and in promoting trustworthy AI that is consistent with the Union 's values and interests. It provides the Union with a powerful basis for strengthen ing EU digital diplomacy and for negotiat ing, with other European and non-European countries , the first legally binding international agreement on AI , based on shared values and principles . 2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY • Legal basis Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides that the Commission shall submit recommendations to the Council, which shall adopt a decision authorising the opening of negotiations and nominate the Union negotiator. Under Article 218(4) of the TFEU, the Council may address directives to the negotiator. • Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence) T he proposed AI ac t lays down harmonised rules for AI systems in the Union, thereby preventing Member States from imposing further restrictions, unless explicitly authori s ed by the Act . Under Article 3(2) of the TFEU, the Union has exclusive competence for the conclusion of international agreements in so far as they may affect common rules or alter their scope. It follows, t herefore, that for all matters relating to the design, development and application of AI systems , covered to a large extent in EU law or to be covered following the foreseeable future development of EU law and in particular the proposed AI a ct , the Union should have a competence to negotiate the future Council of Europe convention on AI. • Proportionality This initiative does not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the policy objectives at stake. • Choice of the instrument The choice of the instrument is a recommendation for a Council decision, as stip ulated in Article 218(3) and (4) TFEU. 3. RESULTS OF EX POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS • Ex post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation N/A • Stakeholder consultations N/A • Collection and use of expertise The Commission has taken account of views expressed by Member State experts in discussions in the relevant Council working group to prepar e for the negotiations. • Impact assessment N/A • Regulatory fitness and simplification N/A • Fundamental rights The proposed AI a ct and the Council of Europe convention under consideration both seek to minimise risks and ensure a high level of protection of fundamental rights that might in certain circumstances be negatively affected by the development and use of AI, while also recognising the potential of AI to protect and facilitate the exercise of those rights in the digital environment and to improve societal and environmental wellbeing and technological progress. 4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS There are no budgetary implications envisaged for the Union budget. 5. OTHER ELEMENTS • Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements The negotiation process is expected to last until 2024, after which convention may be sign ed and conclu ded . Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for a Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 218(3) and (4) thereof, Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission, Whereas: (1) In 2021, the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers set up a Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) for the period 2022-2024, tasked with setting up an international negotiation process to develop a legal framework on the development, design and application of artificial intelligence (AI), based on the Council of Europe’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, and conducive to innovation . (2) On 30 June 2022, the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers instructed the Committee on Artificial Intelligence to proceed speedily with the elaboration of a legally binding instrument of a transversal nature ( ‘ convention ’ / ‘ framework convention ’ ) on artificial intelligence based on the Council of Europe’s standards on human rights, democracy and the rule of law, in line with its terms of reference, focused on general common principle s, conducive to innovation, and open to participation by non-member States, while taking into account other relevant existing international legal frameworks or those under development . (3) Subsequently , the Chair of the Committee on Artificial Intelligence proposed a zero draft of the (framework) convention that would apply to the design, development and application of AI systems. The zero draft includes : provisions on purpose and object , scope , definitions , f undamental principles inc luding procedural safeguards and rights applicable to all AI systems irrespective of their level of risk , additional measures for AI systems in the public sector and for AI systems posing ‘unacceptable’ and ‘significant’ levels of risk , a follow-up and cooperation mechanism ; final provisions, including a possibility for the Union to accede to the convention ; and an appendix, under development, on a methodology for risk and impact assessment of AI systems. (4) The Union has adopted common rules that will be affected by the elements considered for the Council of Europe convention. This includes in particular a comprehensive set of rules in the area of the single market for products and services for which AI systems can be used , as well as rules on the protection of fundamental rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and implemented in secondary Union legislation , considering that those rights are likely to be adversely affected in certain circumstances by the developmen t and use of certain AI systems. (5) Moreover, o n 21 April 2021, the Commission submitted a legislative proposal for a r egulation laying down harmonised rules for AI , currently being negotiated by the European Parliament and the Council . The envisaged Council of Europe convention to a large extent overlaps with the legislative proposal in its scope , since both instruments aim to lay down rules applicable to the design, development and application of AI systems, provided and used by either public or private entities. (6) Therefore, the conclusion of the Council of Europe convention under consideration may affect existing and foreseeable future common Union rules or alter their scope within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (7) In order to protect the integrity of Union law and to ensure that the rules of international law and Union law remain consistent, it is necessary that the Commission be authorised to negotiate on behalf of the Union the Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law . (8) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council and delivered an opinion on … HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1 The Commission is hereby authorised to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, the Council of Europe (framework) convention on a rtificial i ntelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law. Article 2 The negotiating directives are set out in the Annex. Article 3 The negotiations shall be conducted in consultation with [name of the special committee to be inserted by the Council] . Article 4 This Decision is addressed to the Commission. Done at Brussels, For the Council The President ANNEX to the Recommendation for a Council Decision authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for a Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law Regarding the process of the negotiations, the Union should aim to achieve that: The negotiation process is open, inclusive and transparent, and based on robust evidence and cooperation in good faith. The negotiation process is based on an inclusive consultation process and enables meaningful participation for all relevant stakeholders, including civil society, the private sector, academia, non-governmental organisations, standardisation organisations and other relevant actors with expertise rel ating to the regulation of the design, development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) systems. All inputs received from all negotiating Parties are considered on an equal basis to ensure an inclusive process. The negotiation process is based on an effective and realistic work programme for the elaboration of the (framework) convention. Regarding the general objectives for the negotiations, the Union should aim to achieve that: The convention is compatible with E U single market law and other areas of EU law, including its general principles of EU law and the fundamental rights and freedoms as enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and implemented through secondary E U legislation. The convention is compatible with the proposed a rtificial i ntelligence a ct (AI a ct) , taking into account future developments in the legislative process. The convention serves as an effective and future-proof regulatory framework for AI with a view to ensuring a high level of protection of human rights and preservation of European values, while at the same time fostering innovation, increasing legal certainty and trust ; the convention also acknowledges the potential benefits of AI for important public interests , including to protect and facilitate the exercise of human rights in the digital environment , to improve societal and environmental wellbeing and health and to promote technological progress. The convention strengthens the international cooperation between the European Union and other European and non-European countries which may accede to the convention . The c onvention is compatible with existing Council of Europe instruments, in particular the European Convention on Human Rights and its Protocols, Council of Europe Convention No 108 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data, as amended by Protocol CETS 223, and other relevant Council of Europe legal instruments ; t he c onvention avoids duplication with those instruments and any adverse impact on their application or the further accession of any country to them ; t he c onvention addresses the novel risks and challenges posed by the specific features of certain AI systems for compliance with and effective enforcement of existing rights protected under those instruments. The c onvention is compatible with the commitments of the European Union in respect of other international agreements to which it is a party, and avoids any adverse impact on their effective application ; in particular, the c onvention is in line with the Union’s international trade commitments and avoid s unnecessary or unjustified restrictions on trade. Regarding the substance of the negotiations, the Union should aim to achieve that: The provisions of the c onvention are fully compatible with EU single market law and other areas of EU law, including the general principle s of EU law and fundamental rights, as enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and implemented in secondary E U legislation. The provisions of the c onvention are fully compatible with the provisions of the proposed AI a ct, taking into account future developments in the legislative process. The provisions of the convention allow parties to grant a wider protection than stipulated in the Convention and in no way undermine the level of protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and the guarantees provided in Union law , including the principle that authorities supervising fundamental rights need to be independent in so far as this is required under EU Law . The c onvention follows a risk-based approach and lays down proportionate, effective and clear rules applicable to public and private entities across the AI value chain , which are meant to minimise the risks arising from the design, development and application of certain AI systems, while avoiding any unnecessary and disproportionate burden s or restrictions on the activities of those entities or constraints on technological development ; i n particular, the scope and stringency of any regulatory intervention are balanced, justified and scaled in accordance with the levels of risk posed by the AI systems. The provisions of the c onvention are formulated, to the extent possible, in a future-proof and flexible manner to allow consideration of future technological, market , societal and environmental developments related to AI . The c onvention provides for rules for the design , development and application of AI systems which avoid overlaps and provide meaningful added value compared to other relevant international or regional conventions, in particular in the area of data protection ; t hose rules for AI are compatible with such conventions and with international human rights standards. The c onvention includes provisions for the effective implementation of the rules applicable to the design, development, and application of AI systems, notably with appropriate ex ante and ex post compliance and control mechanisms , and recogni ses the role of standards, certification mechanisms, independent third parties involved in compliance checks and competent supervisory authorities. The c onvention allows for measures in support of innovation, including testing of AI systems and the establishment and operation of regulatory sandboxes to foster AI innovation in a controlled environment under the supervision of competent authorities. The c onvention takes into account the special needs of s mall and m edium -s ized e nterprises (SMEs), does not disproportionately affect their competitiveness and obliges the Parties to take specific measure s to support them. The convention takes into account the interest of law enforcement and judicial authorities for the purpose of the prevention, investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, including with regard to the confidentiality and integrity of such investigations. The c onvention provides for effective supervision by competent authorities and cooperation mechanisms that allow for its effective implementation. Regarding the functioning of the c onvention, the Union should aim to achieve that: The c onvention includes a disconnection clause that allows the EU Member States, in their mutual relations, to continue to apply E U law in matters covered by the scope of the c onvention. The convention provides for an appropriate mechanism to ensure its implementation and includes final provisions, including on the settlement of disputes, signature, ratification, acceptance, approval and accession, entry into force, amendment, suspension, denunciation and depositary and languages, modelled where possible and appropriate on provisions of other relevant Council of Europe conventions. The c onvention allows for the European Union to become a party to it. Resolutsiooni liik: Riigikantselei resolutsioon Viide: Justiitsministeerium / / ; Riigikantselei / / 2-5/22-01697 Resolutsiooni teema: Riigikantselei resolutsioon: EL Nõukogu otsus läbirääkimiste avamise kohta seoses Euroopa Nõukogu konventsiooniga, mis puudutab tehisintellekti, inimõigusi, demokraatiat ja õigusriiki Adressaat: Justiitsministeerium Ülesanne: Tulenevalt Riigikogu kodu- ja töökorra seaduse § 152` lg 1 p 2 ning Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 3 lg 4 palun valmistada ette Vabariigi Valitsuse seisukoha ja otsuse eelnõu järgneva algatuse kohta, kaasates seejuures olulisi huvigruppe ja osapooli: - COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for a Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law, COM(2022) 414 EISi toimiku nr: 22-0492 Tähtaeg: 26.09.2022 Adressaat: Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, Kaitseministeerium, Keskkonnaministeerium, Kultuuriministeerium, Maaeluministeerium, Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium, Rahandusministeerium, Siseministeerium, Sotsiaalministeerium, Välisministeerium Ülesanne: Palun esitada oma sisend Justiitsministeeriumile seisukohtade kujundamiseks antud eelnõu kohta (eelnõude infosüsteemi (EIS) kaudu). Tähtaeg: 12.09.2022 Lisainfo: Eelnõu on kavas arutada valitsuse 06.10.2022 istungil ja Vabariigi Valitsuse reglemendi § 6 lg 6 kohaselt sellele eelneval nädalal (28.09.2022) EL koordinatsioonikogus. Esialgsed materjalid EL koordinatsioonikoguks palume esitada hiljemalt 26.09.2022. Kinnitaja: Katrin Juhandi, Euroopa Liidu asjade direktori asetäitja Kinnitamise kuupäev: 31.08.2022 Resolutsiooni koostaja: Elen Nurme [email protected], 693 5201  Andmed algatuse kohta Nimetus COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for a Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence , human rights , democracy and the rule of law Eelnõu nr COM(2022) 414 final Esitamise kuupäev: 1 8 .0 8 .2022 Menetluskord EL-is: tavamenetlus SEISUKOHA Valitsusse toomise alus 1. FORMCHECKBOX RK KT S § 152 1 lg 1 p1 - algatuse/teatise reguleerimisala nõuab seaduse või Riigikogu otsuse vastuvõtmist, muutmist või kehtetuks tunnistamist 2. FORMCHECKBOX RK KT S § 152 1 lg 1 p2 - algatuse/ vastuvõtmisega või teatises toodud meetmete rakendamisega kaasneb oluline majanduslik , sotsiaalne või muu mõju 3. FORMCHECKBOX RK KT S § 152 1 lg 2 - Euroopa Liidu asjade komisjoni või väliskomisjoni nõue 4. FORMCHECKBOX VVS § 20 1 lg 1 - algatuse/teatise reguleerimisala nõuab VV pädevusse kuuluva otsuse vastuvõtmist (määruse vastuvõtmine, muutmine, tühistamine) 5. FORMCHECKBOX VVS § 20 1 lg 2 - seisukoha võtmist algatuse/teatise osas peab oluliseks peaminister või minister (on poliitiliselt oluline või tundlik (Eestis või EL-is)) Valitsusele esitamine Kuupäev 2 8 .0 9 KOK, 0 6 . 10 VV EL menetluse ajakava Siseriiklik menetlus Vastutav min J M Kaasatud ministeeriumid MKM, VäM , HTM, KuM , KaM , SiM , MeM , KeM , SoM RM (sisendi andmise tähtaeg 1 2 . 0 9 ) Sotsiaalpartnerid, huvigrupid Kaasata vajadusel asjasse puutuvad partnerid ja huvigrupid EELNÕU ÜLEVAADE kokkuvõte eelõu sisust ja eesmärkidest Otsusega on plaanis anda volitus EL nimel läbirääkimiste avamiseks Euroopa Nõukogu tulevase konventsiooni üle , mis käsitleb tehisintellekti , inimõiguse i d, demokraatia t ja õigusriik i, võtta vastu vastavad läbirääkimisjuhised ning nimetada Euroopa K omisjon liidu läbirääkijaks . 2021. aasta aprillis esitas Euroopa Komisjon määruse eelnõu, millega ühtlusta ta ks tehisintellektisüsteemide reeglid kõigis liikmesrii kides; hetkel läbirääkimised eelnõu üle ELs kestavad . Ajavahemikuks 2022–2024 loodi Euroopa Nõukogu Ministrite Komitee poolt omakorda tehisintellekti komitee , mille ülesandeks oli luua rahvusvaheline läbirääkimisprotsess tehisintellekti arendamise, kavandamise ja rakendamise õigusraamistiku väljatöötamiseks. 30. juunil 2022 andis Euroopa Nõukogu Ministrite Komitee korralduse jätka t a õiguslikult siduva dokumendi (kas konventsiooni või raamkonventsiooni näol) väljatöötamis ega tehisintellekti reguleerimiseks, tuginedes Euroopa Nõukogu inimõiguste, demokraatia ja õigusriigi standarditele . ELi toimimise lepingu artikli 3 lõikes 2 on sätestatud, et liidul on ainupädevus s õlmida rahvusvaheline leping olukorras , ku s selle sõlmimine võib mõjutada EL ühiseid eeskirju või neid muuta . Rahvusvaheline leping võib mõjutada ühiseid eeskirju või muuta nende ulatust, kui lepinguga hõlmatud valdkond kattub või on suures osas hõlmatud liidu õigusega. Läbirääkimised tulevase tehisintellekti käsitleva Euroopa Nõukogu (raam ) konventsiooni üle on tihedalt seotud liidu pädevusse kuuluva te küsimus tega ning hetkel eksisteerib EL tehisintellekti määruse ning Euroopa Nõukogu konventsiooni eelnõude vahel laialdane kattumine ulatuse, olemuse ja sisu osas. On oluline, et l äbirääkimisi peetakse EL nimel viisil, mis taga b ELi tehisintellekti eeskirjade järjepidevus e ja ühtsus e ning et tulevane Euroopa Nõukogu konventsioon on täielikult kooskõlas kehtiva ja tulevase ELi õigusega . Lisaks on komisjoni hinnangul oluline, et k a Euroopa Liit saa ks konventsiooni ga liituda . Võimalikud sots-maj. mõjud võimalikud õiguslikud muudatused Mõju eelarvele Kommentaarid SEISUKOHAD Eesti seisukoht Teiste riikide seisukohad Kommentaarid Eelnõude infosüsteemis (EIS) on antud täitmiseks ülesanne. Eelnõu toimik: 17.4/22-0492 - COM(2022) 414 Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for a Council of Europe convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law Arvamuse andmine eelnõu kohta Justiitsministeeriumile vastavalt Riigikantselei 31.08.2022 resolutsioonile. Osapooled: Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeerium; Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium; Kultuuriministeerium; Kaitseministeerium; Siseministeerium; Maaeluministeerium; Rahandusministeerium; Keskkonnaministeerium; Välisministeerium Tähtaeg: 12.09.2022 00:00 Link eelnõu toimiku vaatele: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/f4ac61a6-bfdf-4645-b79b-1e0f5791f3a6 Link menetlusetapile: https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main/mount/docList/f4ac61a6-bfdf-4645-b79b-1e0f5791f3a6?activity=2 Eelnõude infosüsteem (EIS) https://eelnoud.valitsus.ee/main