dokumendiregister.ee
OtsingAsutusedMCP
dokumendiregister.eeAsutusedEesti avalike dokumendiregistrite otsing · nimistu.ee andmetel
Otsing›Sotsiaalministeerium
Sissetulev kiriAvalik

Pöördumine

Sotsiaalministeerium · 1. veebruar 2023
Viit
1.4-2/553-1
Registreeritud
1. veebruar 2023
Dokumendi liik
Sissetulev kiri
Adressaat
European Commission
Saabumis/saatmisviis
e-post
Funktsioon
1.4 EL otsustusprotsess ja rahvusvaheline koostöö
Sari
1.4-2 Rahvusvahelise koostöö korraldamisega seotud kirjavahetus (Arhiiviväärtuslik)
Toimik
1.4-2/2023
Vastutaja
Marlen Timm (Sotsiaalministeerium, Kantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Terviseala asekantsleri vastutusvaldkond, Ravimiosakond)
Lahendamise tähtaeg
3. märts 2023

Failid

  • 📎E-kiri.pdf73 KB

Sisu (failidest)

Saatja: <[email protected]> Saadetud: 01.02.2023 10:21 Adressaat: <[email protected]>; Brusselmans Tom <[email protected]> Koopia: <[email protected]> Teema: Risk-based approach + sampling exercise in EU and 3rd countries Dear colleagues, dear competent authorities on 3rd countries plasma collection sites, Currently, the Plasma Master File (PMF) assessors face specific problems related to the in the PMF submitted information on blood establishments inspections. This unclear or incomplete information sometimes leads to delays on certification and might impact plasma approval and supply. We therefore wanted to have your view on some current practices and future considerations: 1) As you are aware, EMA implemented a risk based approach for Plasma Master File (PMF) listed sites. This approach was first implemented for third country blood establishments, but each blood competent authority could also use this approach for the inspection of national blood establishments and blood banks to demonstrate compliance with Directive 2002/98/EC. Can you please inform us what the current practice is in your country? Are you applying a risk-based approach when inspecting blood establishments? And if yes, what are the maximum time intervals you use for inspections of the different types of blood establishments? 2) Given that plasma collection centres are part of the same company and they all apply the same quality system, is it acceptable in your country to do some kind of sampling exercise when inspecting these centres? This means instead of inspecting all centres, only inspecting the parent organisation and a selection of some collection sites to inspect as a sample. 3) Would you consider the sampling exercise as mentioned above also acceptable for sites in 3rd countries? We would appreciate if you could send your replies on these questions to by 15 February 2023. With kind regards, On behalf of the EMA colleagues and the SoHO team. European Commission DG SANTE (Health and Food Safety) Unit D2 Medical Products: quality, safety, innovationOffice address: Rue Breydel 2, 06/004, B-1049 Brussels/Belgium
Allikas: Sotsiaalministeerium dokumendiregister →