Saatja: Joris Casneuf <
[email protected]>
Saaja:
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected], Info,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected], Liis Lindström,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected], Maarja Oras,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected], Veerle Vertongen,
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected]
Teema: RE: ACA-Europe - seminar "Better regulation" - Questionnaire
Dear Mr. Justice Frank Clarke,
Thank you for your e-mail.
We understand the confusion that may exist in the dividing line between advisory bodies and interest groups, particularly in jurisdictions without a Council of State or an equivalent advisory body.
The questionnaire is aimed to identify independent advisory bodies that advise on the quality of legislation based on their position or expertise. We mean to only include advisory bodies with (preferably) an institutional basis and who assert the public interest. To illustrate, in the Netherlands we have a number of advisory bodies that are consulted in the process of legislation, usually based on their specific area of expertise such as the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (Autority on Data Protection), the Kiesraad (Electoral Council), the Onderwijsraad (Educational Council). We do not expect a full list of advisory bodies that meet these criteria, but are rather interested to know of the mechanism that allow such advisory bodies to provide input on the quality of specific legislation, preferably illustrated with a few examples. Lobby groups or private interest groups are not considered to be part of our definition of an advisory body within the context of this questionnaire. Such parties can however, provide input in case of a more general public consultation as reflected in questions 7 and 15 of the questionnaire.
I hope this answer provides you more clarity on what is meant by an advisory body in this questionnaire. Should you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Van:
[email protected] [mailto:
[email protected]]
Verzonden: vrijdag 20 januari 2017 15:24
Aan: Joris Casneuf <
[email protected]>
CC:
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]; Veerle Vertongen <
[email protected]>;
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: ACA-Europe - seminar "Better regulation" - Questionnaire
I have taken a quick read through this and would just like to clarify the precise meaning of the term "advisory body" as used. Obviously any person or group of persons can make submissions on proposed legislation. Sometimes these persons or groups may have legal or other relevant expertise but equally they may ( with or without expertise ) also be interested parties in the legislation itself. Could we have some help on the dividing line between an "advisory body" and an "interest group". This is particularly relevant in a jurisdiction such as Ireland where there is no equivalent of a Council of State with an advisory role and only very limited public or quasi public bodies who advise on legislation.
Regards
FC
Mr. Justice Frank Clarke,
The Supreme Court,
Dublin. 7.
Ireland
Joris Casneuf <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >
20/01/2017 13:45
To: "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected]>, "
[email protected]" <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, Veerle Vertongen <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >, "
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> " <
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> >,
cc:
Subject: ACA-Europe - seminar "Better regulation" - Questionnaire
Dear president,
Dear ACA-correspondent,
ACA-Europe will hold its annual General Assembly in the Hague on Tuesday, May 16th, 2017. On May 15th, 2017, the Presidents of all ACA-Members will also be invited to attend the seminar on the topic of the Quality of law-making and the EU program ‘Better Regulation”. Formal invitations to both events will be sent out at a later time. For now, on behalf of the President of ACA-Europe, I am pleased to send you the questionnaire related to this seminar. You are kindly requested to fill it out and send it back to Ms. Asha Osman (
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> ) before February 20th, 2017.
Kind regards,
Geert Debersaques
Secretary general ACA-Europe
Cher président, chère présidente,
Cher ACA-correspondant,
L’ACA-Europe tiendra son assemblée générale annuelle à La Haye le mardi 16 mai 2017. La veille de cette réunion, le lundi 15 mai 2017, l’ACA organisera un séminaire portant sur les thèmes de la qualité de la législation et sur l’initiative « Mieux légiférer» de l’Union européenne. Les invitations pour ces deux événements vous seront envoyées prochainement. Entre temps, je me permets de vous adresser, au nom du Président de l’ACA, le questionnaire relatif à ce séminaire. Nous vous demandons de bien vouloir le remplir et de le renvoyer à Mme Asha Osman (
[email protected] <mailto:
[email protected]> ) avant le 20 février 2017.
Bien à vous,
Geert Debersaques
Secrétaire général ACA-Europe