IHB File N° S1/1001/WP
CIRCULAR LETTER 14/2016
15 March 2016
REPORT ON THE OVERALL STATUS OF THE IHO WORK PROGRAMME
END OF 2015
References:
A. EIHC-5 - Decision No. 3 (PRO. 5 - Improving the total cost estimate of the IHO tasks for the
definition of a prioritized Work Programme);
B. IHO Circular Letter 17/2015 dated 24 February - Report on the overall status of the IHO Work
Programme - end of 2014;
C. IHO Circular Letter 66/2015 dated 2 September 2015 - Report on the overall Status of the IHO
Work Programme - mid-year 2015.
Dear Hydrographer,
Background
1. Decision No. 3 of the 5th Extraordinary International Hydrographic Conference (EIHC-5) introduced
a six-monthly reporting regime to help assess the progress of the IHO Work Programme (see Reference A).
The status reports at the end of 2014 and at mid-year 2015 were circulated to Member States in February
and September 2015 (see References B and C). This Circular Letter provides a report for the next reporting
point - second semester of 2015.
2. On 1 February 2016, the Directing Committee invited the Chairs of Regional Hydrographic
Commissions, Committees, Sub-Committees and Working Groups and the Director of the IHO Data Centre
for Digital Bathymetry (DCDB) to report by 01 March 2016 on the overall status of their respective work
programme. A reporting template was provided to achieve this.
Outcome at the end of 2015
3. 19 of 41 Chairs provided a report for the period July to December 2015. This represents a response
rate of about 46%, significantly lower than the response rates for the two previous reporting periods. The
inventory of the responses to the three biannual surveys is provided in Annex A.
4. As directed by EIHC-5, the Directing Committee is providing in Annex B a brief summary of the
reports received. The reports themselves are reproduced in Annex C (in English only).
Main areas of concern reported
5. Based on the reports received, the Directing Committee notes that the limited expertise available to
the relevant working groups may hinder progress in addressing portrayal and data protection issues related
to the development of the S-100 framework. Also, further delays in revising Edition 5.0.0 of IHO
Publication S-58 - ENC Validation Checks may affect the implementation of mandatory checks to ensure
that ENCs do not contain any critical errors.
6. No significant shortcomings have been reported in the execution of the IRCC work programme.
Feedback
7. Seven Member States provided comments in response to Reference C: Argentina, Chile, Mauritius,
Nigeria, Spain, Sweden and United Kingdom. Their responses are provided in Annex D.
8. Noting the small number of comments and the mix of opinions on the usefulness and frequency of
the reports that they reflect, the Directing Committee invites further feedback from Member States on the
reporting process at their earliest convenience and not later than 31 May 2016. The comments from the
Member States will be collated by the Directing Committee to inform the re-consideration of the reporting
process by the next IHO Conference/Assembly in 2017, as provided by the Conference Decision at
Reference A.
Next Reporting Period
9. In accordance with the Conference Decision at Reference A, the Directing Committee will issue its
next request for six-monthly reports in July 2016.
On behalf of the Directing Committee
Yours sincerely,
Robert WARD
President
Annexes:
A. Inventory of the responses to the three bi-annual surveys
B. Compilation of the Status Reports from IHO bodies and inter-organizational bodies involving the
IHO - End of 2015
C. Status Reports received (in English only)
D. Responses from Member States to IHO CL 66/2015
Copy (by e-mail):
- Chairs and Vice-Chairs of IHO bodies
- Chairs and Vice-Chairs of inter-organizational bodies involving the IHO
2
Annex A to IHO CL 14/2016
INVENTORY OF THE RESPONSES TO THE THREE BI-ANNUAL SURVEYS
IHO bodies and Reports at end Reports at Reports at end Comments
inter-organizational of 2014 mid-2015 of 2015
bodies
HSSC Yes Yes Yes
S-100WG Yes Yes Yes
ENCWG Yes (DIPWG) Yes Yes
DPSWG Yes Yes Yes
NIPWG Yes Yes
NCWG Yes Yes Yes
DQWG Yes Yes No report
TWCWG Yes (SCWG) Yes No report
HDWG No report Yes Yes
ABLOS No report (late No report
submission)
IRCC Yes Yes No report
HCA Yes Yes No report
WWNWS-SC Yes Yes Yes
CBSC Yes No report No report
WEND-WG Yes Yes Yes
IENWG Yes Yes Yes
MSDIWG Yes No report No report
CSBWG Not Applicable Not Applicable No report CSBWG established by
IRCC7 (June 2015)
IBSC No report No report No report
GEBCO-GC Yes Yes No report
TSCOM
Yes Yes Yes Joint reports
SCRUM
SCUFN Yes Yes Yes
DCDB No report No report No report
NHC No report No report No report
NSHC Yes Yes Yes
MBSHC No report No report No report
BSHC No report No report No report
USCHC No report No report No report
EAHC No report No report No report
EAtHC Yes Yes Yes
SEPRHC No report No report No report
SWPHC No report No report No report
MACHC Yes Yes Yes
SAIHC Yes Yes Yes
NIOHC Yes No report Yes
RSAHC No report No report No report
SWAtHC No report No report No report
ARHC No report No report No report
FC Yes Yes No report
SRWG Yes Yes Yes
A-1
Annex B to IHO CL 14/2016
COMPILATION OF THE STATUS REPORTS FROM IHO BODIES AND
INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL BODIES INVOLVING THE IHO - END OF 2015
Number of responses
1. The Chairs of 19 bodies responded to the IHB request by 1 March 2016. The following 22 bodies
did not provide any report:
- subsidiary bodies:
FC
- subordinate organs of HSSC:
DQWG, TWCWG
- subordinate organ of IRCC:
IRCC, HCA, CBSC, CSBWG, MSDIWG, DCDB
-
- Regional Hydrographic Commissions:
ARHC, BSHC, EAHC, MBSHC, NHC, RSAHC, SEPRHC, SWAtHC, SWPHC, USCHC
- Inter-organizational bodies: ABLOS, IBSC, GEBCO GC.
Status of the work programme of the HSSC
2. The development of S-100 and the evolution of the S-100 Registry have benefited from additional
dedicated support kindly provided by the Republic of Korea and the USA. However, the limited expertise
available may hinder progress in addressing S-100-related portrayal and data protection issues.
3. The report of the ENC Standards Maintenance Working Group (ENCWG) identifies a new technical
issue which may delay the preparation of Edition 5.1.0 of IHO Publication S-58 - ENC Validation Checks.
The implementation of mandatory checks ensuring that ENCs do not contain any critical errors is
dependent on the completion of the revision of S-58, Edition 5.0.0.
4. It is likely that both the Vice-Chair and the Chair of the Nautical Cartography Working Group
(NCWG) will have to be replaced successively following their expected retirement. Nominees for the
election of the new Vice-Chair at the next NCWG meeting (April 2016) should stand ready to assume the
role of Chair in the near future.
5. The development through the Wikipedia Foundation of a multi-language Wiki Demonstrator seems
to be a promising prospect for supporting the on-line Hydrographic Dictionary S-32.
Status of the work programmes of the Regional Hydrographic Commissions
6. Only five out of the 15 RHCs provided a report.
7. Lack of awareness and the under-development of hydrographic capabilities are the main issues
reported.
Status of the work programme of the IRCC
8. No significant issue is reported.
B-1
Annex C to IHO CL 14/2016
STATUS REPORTS RECEIVED – END OF 2015
Contents:
- HSSC
- S-100WG
- ENCWG
- DPSWG
- NIPWG
- NCWG
- HDWG
- NSHC
- EAtHC
- MACHC
- SAIHC
- NIOHC
- WWNWS-SC
- WEND-WG
- IENWG
- TSCOM & SCRUM
- SCUFN
- SRWG
C-1
HSSC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of Hydrographic Standards and Services Committee (HSSC)
Compiled by Dr Mathias Jonas - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Maintenance of current ECDIS standards: Coordination with IEC and IMO Request of industry to extend by one year, until 31
implementation of the new editions of S- August 2017, the transition period for
52, S-52 Presentation Library, S-58, S-63 upgrading existing ECDIS systems to meet the revised
and S-64 set of IHO and IEC standards which came into force on
31 August 2015 for new ECDIS systems
Creation of edition 2.0 of S-63 for S-10x data Planned for a draft to be
Products behind schedule circulated prior to meeting in March 2016.
Development of S-100 and S-100 based Due to IT reasons reengineering of the registry NOAA and ROK work on it
product specifications structure and the register interface required
Delayed completion of the portrayal catalogue builder Pending completion of the reengineering of the registry
for S-101 structure and interface but lack of funding as well.
Need to explore the use of the S-52 Presentation
Library funds of the IHO special project funds.
S-102 still needs to establish both a feature and Pending completion of the reengineering of the registry
portrayal catalogue for machine readability. It also structure and interface (see above)
needs to propose the encoding that will be used for this
product to S-100 edition 2.1.0
C-2
S-100WG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of theS-100 Working Group
Compiled by Julia Powell - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Develop an S-100 Interoperability Guidebook Currently this project is on track. Have secured funding via a Korea-NOAA
agreement to provide the initial scope of work.
Publish edition 3.0.0 of S-100 After the S100WG01 meeting in March plan needs Edition 3.0.0 will include a new encoding format
to be developed for the review and finalization of and proposed corrections and clarifications as a
S-100 ed. 3.0.0 result of the S-100 test bed activities.
Prepare a New Edition of S-102 S-102 still needs to establish both a feature and
portrayal catalogue for machine readability. It
also needs to propose the encoding that will be
used for this product to S-100 edition 2.1.0
Update the S-100 Portrayal Catalogue Builder The PCB has not been used to develop S-100 Need to explore the use of the S-52 Presentation
(PCB) based portrayal catalogues as the focus has been Library funds of the IHO special project funds.
on updating the other pieces of S-100
infrastructure. Because of the lack of extensive
testing and some changes to the S-100 Register
infrastructure the PCB may need to have some
additional upgrades and functionality added.
C-3
ENCWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of Electronic Navigational Chart WG (ENC WG)
Compiled by: Thomas Mellor - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
S-52 Presentation Library - Clarify issues reported On track S-52 Presentation Library edition 4.0.1 was issued in
by OEMs during recent type approval tests. June 2015.
A number of comments have been received from
OEMs taking ECDIS through type approval with the
new standards. These will be addressed at a meeting in
Monaco (8-10 Feb 2016) with final approval by the
ENCWG in March.
S-64 Clarify issues reported by OEMs during On track A number of comments have been received from
recent type approval tests OEMs taking ECDIS through type approval with the
new standards. These will be addressed at a meeting in
Monaco (8-10 Feb 2016) with final approval by the
ENCWG in March.
S-58 - 5.1.0 revision currently underway Caris have identified issues with ISO terms and The task will not be able to proceed until this issue with
definitions used to describe spatial operators in S-58 spatial operator definitions is agreed.
19125-1. ENCWG will have to decide to either This will be considered at ENCWG1 (March 2016)
define our own definitions for spatial operators,
accept them as defined or lobby ISO to update
their definitions.
S-65 review to ensure alignment with the WEND Not started Task group to be established at ENCWG1 (March
Principles. 2016)
S-66 On track Since HSSC7 the review of S-66 has been the
responsibility of ENCWG. The current draft document
and comment form will be reviewed at ENCWG1
(March 2016)
C-4
DPSWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of DPSWG
Compiled by: Jonathan Pritchard - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Creation of edition 2.0 of S-63 for S-10x data Behind schedule. Planned for a draft to be A drafting group and DPSWG meeting is
products circulated prior to meeting in March 2016. The scheduled for March 2016 in Tokyo alongside S-
goal of that meeting is the production of a draft. l00 and S57 WG meetings. This should provide
the opportunity to turn the current document into a
workable draft. The current document has been
circulated to DPSWG members for comment and
update. Resource constraints for authoring S-63
are the only issue as most technical elements are
now present.
Support to data protection scheme administrators On track A reactive function for the DPSWG group. A
and end users (including ECDIS OEMs) mixture of simple queries and issues of policy
which are progressed with IHB staff. Some
discussion over the use of data for non-
navigational purposes and licence agreements will
be tabled at the DPSWG meeting in Tokyo.
Input into other IHO work groups on S-63 2.0 On track Papers clarifying responsibilities and metadata
structure. updates to S-l00 will be presented at S-l00WG
meeting in Tokyo. This reflects structural
agreements made by DPSWG in previous
meetings and provides a framework for
completion of the draft 2.0.
C-5
NIPWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of NIPWG
Compiled by: Jens Schröder-Fürstenberg - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Populate the NPUBS domain of the FCD Register [NEED] improvement of the registry handling The registry is under construction and
(work item F.7) improvement comments based on the testing phase
experience have been provided
Develop S-122–Marine Protected Area Product [GAP] portrayal and data quality parts missing Portrayal part is under consideration by the
Specification (work item F 8.1) involved WGs, quality model was forwarded to
[NEED] harmonization with S-101 data model,
the DQWG for further consideration.
feature catalogue builder
The harmonization discussion between the S-
100WG/S-101 Project Team and NIPWG is
ongoing, the feature catalogue builder is not
available
Draft Data Capture and Encoding Guides for [NEED] harmonization with S-101 data model Both the S-101 and the S-122 data models should
Marine Protected Area Product Specification be harmonized to the widest possible extent. The
(work item J.2.1.1) next phase is to await the next S-100WG meeting
where the DCEG improvements will be discussed
Establish and monitor, in liaison with the S- [NEED] specification of the intended operation The issue is under consideration by the S-100WG,
100WG, the project teams required to specify and of/between different product specifications Unique identifier proposals are under
develop nautical information layers for use in consideration
ECDIS (IHO Task 2.6.2)
C-6
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Develop high level specifications for a combined [GAP] MSP specification MSPs in their current status of development have
Marine Service Portfolio (MSP) covering the not been accepted by the IMO. Further
provision of hydrographic services to mariners in improvements and clarifications are requested and
accordance with the IMO e-navigation strategy should be provided by mid-2016.
implementation plan
Develop a test and implementation plan for the [GAP] MSP specification MSPs in their current status of development have
development of the MSP “hydrographic services” not been accepted by the IMO. Further
(Work item H) improvements and clarifications are requested and
should be provided by 2016.
A MSP named “hydrographic services” doesn’t
exist at the time when this report was been
compiled.
C-7
NCWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of the Nautical Cartography Working Group (NCWG)
Compiled by Jeff Wootton - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
(A) Maintain and extend Publication S-4 'Chart Issue with requirement to conform to IHO Raised at HSSC7 (November 2015). Will be
Specifications of the IHO & Regulations of the Resolution 2/2007 for S-4 and coordination of further discussed in association with NCWG
IHO for INT Charts' (IHO Task 2.3.2) and publication of associated (IHO adopted) national detailed procedures at NCWG2 (April 2016) and
Maintenance of S-4 supplementary publications INT1 publications (DE, FR, ES). at the HSSC Chair Group meeting (June 2016).
INT 1, 2 & 3 (IHO Task 2.3.2).
(B) Consideration of the future of the paper Likely retirement of the WG Chair may stall Top priority work item assigned at HSSC7.
chart (NCWG Work Item A.16) discussions. Correspondence Group identified but little
correspondence to date due to conflicting priorities
of WG Chair. Discussion paper to be presented at
NCWG2. It is hoped that the succeeding Chair*
of the WG will be able to continue to progress this
item.
(C) Maintain and extend Publication S-11 Part A, None. Revised draft based on decisions and actions from
Guidance for the Preparation and Maintenance of HSSC7 to be presented at NCWG2.
INT Chart Schemes (IHO Task 2.3.2).
(D) Development of new (and revised) symbology Actions HSSC7/18 and HSSC7/20 relate to To be discussed at NCWG2. Liaison with other
(IHO Task 2.3.2). ECDIS portrayal. The NCWG is in the early HSSC Working Groups such is the S-100WG,
stages of transitioning from a focus almost ENCWG and NIPWG; and consultation with
exclusively on symbology for paper charts to expert contributors such as OEMs, is considered
providing subject matter expertise related to essential.
presentation and portrayal for all nautical charting
products. This expertise in regard to ECDIS may
take some time to build, and accessibility to S-100
test beds and test data will be required.
C-8
* NOTE: The current Vice-Chair of the WG will be retiring end of March 2016, and it is expected that the Chair of the WG will be retiring in
the latter half of the year. A new Vice-Chair will be elected at the NCWG2 meeting (April 2016), with an expectation that the newly elected
Vice-Chair will assume the role of Chair of the WG on retirement of the current Chair, in line with HSSC procedures.
C-9
HDWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of HDWG
Compiled by: Jean Laporte, HDWG Chairman - e-mail address:
[email protected];
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Review all terms currently included in S-32 for Thanks to the secondment of a Peruvian officer, Since August 2015, Captain Luis Hernandez,
their relevance in accordance with the S-32 and the Wikipedia initiative explained below, the Peruvian Navy, has been seconded to the IHO to
Business Rules and propose which definitions future of the Hydrographic Dictionary, which was work on the Hydrographic Dictionary, in
should be removed from S-32 lagging abominably, is suddenly looking much particular to generate an up to date searchable
brighter digital Spanish version to be published on the IHO
website. He has brought a Word version up to date
with all the changes from before 2000, removed
the English references and sorted it into Spanish
alphabetical order, the unique reference numbers
have been maintained.
He is now tackling the duplicate words and
identifying terms which he considers are not
hydrographic terms or not in usage any longer; and
which should eventually be removed.
Review the approved definitions of Altitude, Task delayed due amongst other circumstances to 1. The new TWCWG chair lady has been
Elevation and Height the changes affecting the new TWCWG and approached and hopefully, the definition will be
NCWG. It had been agreed with the 2 previous mentioned at the TWCWG April 2016 meeting
chairmen that they should propose a common and the issue revived
definition, but the issue has not been addressed 2. It is envisaged to enter the S-100 unambiguous
definition in the S-32 under a special caption, so as
not to alter the traditional definitions, which are
still used by non-S-100 lesser mortals.
C-10
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
To investigate options (scope, format / content The tentative draft TO and Business rules upgrade 1. Thanks to Wikipedia, a major change is about to
management system, languages, cross-references, are ready and could be finalised during a meeting occur with synoptic presentations in many
maintenance regime, …) and associated resource in Monaco at a date still to be agreed (May 2016 languages against the unique approved IHO
requirements and timeline to produce [and would be ideal) reference and the reintroduction of much regretted
maintain] a reference edition of S-32 index numbers.
2. A report will be prepared to explain the changes
that could take place, after a thorough examination
of the Wiki Demonstrator which, so far, is most
impressive.
C-11
NSHC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of NSHC
Compiled by: Leendert Dorst, Hydrographic Service of the Royal Netherlands Navy - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
shared European contacts and projects None in cooperation with other European RHCs in the
IENWG
shared progress to reach an up to date bathymetric 1. limited survey capacity; 1. resurvey strategies for dynamic areas and
coverage of the North Sea 2. lack of a basin-wide risk assessment emerging survey methods (LIDAR, SDB, CSB)
are taken into account
2. value of a basin-wide risk assessment, as well as
the feasibility of the associated tasks, need to be
re-evaluated at NHSC32
shared experiences relating to Marine Spatial Data none through establishing a BSHC/NSHC MSDI
Infrastructures Working Group
shared progress on the establishment of vertical lack of an international initiative to establish a 1. includes national Chart Datums, references
reference frames consistent set of references for the entire North suitable for the coastal zone, and Ellipsoidally
Sea area Referenced Surveying
2. task is coordinated by the NSHC Tidal WG
3. the current situation will be described by the
Coastal Mapping project of the European
Commission (DG Mare), action item "assess
consistency of the existing vertical datums"
online publication of the North Sea Bathymetry This results in: (a) a contribution to the further
Database at the new web site of NSHC development of EMODNet, (b) assistance in
survey prioritization, and (c) data availability to
society in line with the PSI Directive.
C-12
EAtHC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of ………EAtHC…………
Compiled by … CV A.DIHAJI (DHOC, MOROCCO) - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Continue to engage coastal states of the region // Republic of Congo is a new pending to approval by
to apply to IHO membership. IHO member States to IHO membership (CL 67/2015)
Cooperation with a regional organizations in the // CL about cooperation between the Maritime
region Organization of West and Central Africa (MOWCA)
and IHO was submitted for Member States to provide
comments by correspondence procedure.
Raising the awareness of the importance of Deficiency of awareness of political deciders in For example:
hydrography in the Region and promoting the region on the importance of hydrography for
- Technical visit to Liberia postponed to 2016;
capacity building. the governance of their maritime space by
increasing maritime co-activities, which leads to - High level visit to MOWCA postponed to 2016;
a lack of funding and government support. -To suggest to consider including special session on
hydrographic capacity as an agenda item for discussion
at 38th Annual Council Port Management Association
of West and Central Africa (PMAWCA) in 2016, (A
letter from Chair of EAtHC was sent to PMAWCA to
attend to 37th Annual Council in 2015, without
answer) .
Monitoring and improving the status of nautical -The need to enhance the data available in the
information, surveys, and charting, developing region, for the benefit of national planning or for
and implementing INT chart and ENC schemes. other applications, such as marine disasters
prevention.
-Lack of feedback regarding NAVAREA II
C-13
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Points of Contacts, and no points of contact
at all for some coastal States.
-Ports non-covered by large scale ENCs.
Interest to develop regional hydrographic A few coastal States have national hydrographic We note that some actions taken by Côte d’Ivoire to
courses, based on existing African maritime organizations. They mainly consist in develop its capabilities in hydrography and nautical
academy. hydrographic cells under the main port authority. charting by creation of a Coordination Center of
marine Hydrography and Cartography.
Regional Training Course in Hydrographic Field
Operator for Francophone Africa
C-14
MACHC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of MACHC
Compiled by: Leendert Dorst, Hydrographic Service of the Royal Netherlands Navy - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
increase membership and regional cooperation developments on the use of Spanish needed 1. Membership is growing. The MACHC
welcomed the Dominican Republic as an associate
member in December.
2. Strong participation of industry during the
MACHC Conferences.
shared progress to reach an up to date bathymetric 1. limited survey capacity; 1. emerging survey methods (LIDAR, SDB, CSB)
coverage of the MACHC area 2. lack of a basin-wide risk assessment are taken into account
2. developments on risk assessment methodologies
are followed closely
achieve full ENC coverage None 1. coordinated by the MACHC Integrated Charting
Committee.
2. of the 799 current and planned ENCs required
to meet WEND principles for adequate ENC
coverage, 685 are currently published and
available (86%). The number is growing steadily.
ensure all coastal states reach CB Phase 1 status. None 1. coordinated by the MACHC CB Committee.
2. The requirement to deliver capacity building
activities in Spanish is being met.
3. Annual Hydrographic Awareness Seminars are
organized in conjunction with MACHC meetings
to raise awareness in the region.
contribute to a regional marine SDI through the None 1. coordinated by the MACHC MEIP WG.
Marine Environmental Infrastructure Programme 2. The MACHC ENC Online database will be
(MEIP) of MACHC. available without password protection.
C-15
SAIHC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of ……SAIHC………………
Compiled by …Captain Abri Kampfer - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Promote technical co-operation in the domain of Majority of Associate Member States in region Shortcomings have been identified during
hydrographic surveying, marine cartography, and have still not achieved Phase 1 hydrographic technical visits within the region and are being
nautical information within the Region development. addressed through the SAIHC Capacity Building
Strategy. National reports presented at the SAIHC
Conference allow the opportunity for Associate
Member States to provide feedback on progress
and request specific support. Next ICCWG and
SAIHC Conference scheduled to be held in Cape
Town from 29 to 31August 2016.
Stimulate all countries within the Region to widen Lack of funding and government support. High Visits by IHB President identified as a SAIHC
hydrographic activity in the area and to encourage level interaction required to inform decision Capacity Building priority. CBSC 13 approved a
them to seek technical advice and assistance from makers at the political levels of Government to SAIHC requirement for a High level visit to
the IHB in establishing and strengthening their create awareness and garner support for in-country Tanzania by IHB President and SAIHC Chair for
hydrographic capabilities in order to promote safe officials. 2016. CB Coordinator in process to establish most
navigation and create an environment within suitable date.
which economic development may take place
Facilitate the exchange of information concerning The lack of functioning hydrographic offices and SAIHC Conference and SAIHC ICCWG are used
surveys, research or scientific and technical National Hydrographic Committees create some to communicate the requirements and obtain
developments, to aid in the planning and difficulty to obtain information. information from delegates. Between scheduled
organisation of hydrographic activities conferences there is only communication with INT
Chart producers and no feedback from Associate
Member countries
C-16
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Conduct Capacity Building projects as approved One training event, the Phase 1 Skills Course, The Technical Aspects of Maritime Boundaries
by CBSC transferred from 2015 to 2016 due to difficulty to and Baselines Workshop was successfully
find a suitable host country conducted in Fish Hoek, South Africa and a report
has been submitted. Difficulty experienced with
the hosting of the Phase 1 Skills Course, but there
is confidence to still execute the course in June
2016 in Namibia. Two events planned for 2016
execution is the High Level Visit to Tanzania and
MBES setting to work project for Mozambique.
C-17
NIOHC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of……………..NIOHC
Compiled by: Commodore Mahmudul Hassan e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
NICCWG None Ongoing
Production and maintenance of INT chart and Will be updated at the next NICCWG meeting in
ENC schemes for the NIOHC region. March 16
NIOHC CB None Ongoing
CB plan revised annually at the NIOHC meeting Will be updated at the next NIOHC meeting in
as per MS requirements. March 16
CB events planned and undertaken.
Other IHO bodies None Ongoing
Responding to actions and reports as required by
other IHO bodies eg. IRCC, WEND-WG
C-18
WWNWS-SC REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of: WWNWS-SC
Compiled by: Peter Doherty – Chairman WWNWS-SC - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Maritime Safety Information Training Course Travel expense for 2 Instructors, anticipated via 2 courses per year, 2 instructors per course
CB funding.
Maritime Safety Information Document Review None expected. WG supports review and standardization of IMO,
Work Group WMO, IHO common MSI documents. Chairman
supports through IMO NCSR. Conclusion of
IHO/WMO MoU expected to increase WMO
participation.
S-124 Working Group None at this time. WG has the right mix of WG contributes to the modernization of GMDSS
National MSI authorities and Industry Partners. via e-navigation. Longer term engagement of MS
in S-124 development considered fragile and could
retard S delivery. Harmonization with IALA e-
navigation initiative considered vital.
Review of the Iridium proposal as a GMDSS None expected. Review of Iridium proposal and various
Satellite Service Provider documentation via WWNWS-SC meetings
interaction with IMO and WMO. Longer term
challenges for NAVAREA coordinators’ service
delivery via two satellite providers to be
considered and explored with IMO.
C-19
WEND-WG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of WEND-WG
Compiled by: Mark Halliwell (for Capt Jamie McMichael-Phillips) - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
Overlapping ENC Issues None Four main items, all of which are complete
(including establishment of document repository
on IHO website), or are in progress.
RENC Harmonization and Distribution None Joint RENC report on benefits of joining a RENC
published on IHO website.
ENC Coverage None UKHO continues to provide up-to-date statistics
on ENC coverage and a list of ports and moorings.
IHO Performance Indicators, IHO ENC Catalogue None Updated Programme of Work published on IHO
website. Other items are in progress.
The Full Implementation of the WEND Principles None A report of the correspondence group has been
completed and is available on the IHO website. It
will be discussed at WENDWG6 in March.
Admiralty Information Overlays None Status Report by UKHO and Proposals paper by
other MSs have been published. Will be discussed
at WENDWG6 in March.
C-20
IENWG REPORT
26 January 2016 (last IENWG meeting held in St-Mandé 18-19 January 2016)
Overall status of the work programme of IHO-EC network WG
Compiled by Laurent Kerléguer - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and Any amplifying comments
needs that may prevent
completion of tasks on time
To monitor the outcome of the EC call for
The European Commission’s Directorate-General for Maritime
tender “Coastal mapping”
Affairs and Fisheries (DG Mare) has awarded a contract on
coastal mapping call MARE/2014/10 to the 18 partners’
consortium led by SHOM. Duration of the contract is 36 months.
Kick-off meeting June 2015 in Saint-Mandé.
Overall aims of the project are:
- Assess the current availability of digital coastal maps in
the EU
- Disseminate this information by EMODnet
- Share experience of coastal mapping in the EU
- Develop standards for best practices
- Propose how a future JECMaP could operate
The coastal mapping portal was opened on December 2015.
To prepare the position of European HOs about After consulting European HOs of the RHC concerned, IENWG HOs
the future phase of EMODNet, the long term have defined a common strategy relative to the future EMODNET 3 call
marine data initiative from the European for tender.
Commission Still waiting for EMODNET Bathymetry call to be issued by DG
MARE.
To improve cooperation with the European IENWG considering how it could be represented in the Maritime
Commission, by promoting amongst its entities Spatial Planning Expert Group.
and with decision makers the role of the
hydrographic offices in development of EU
maritime policies.
C-21
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and Any amplifying comments
needs that may prevent
completion of tasks on time
To monitor European directives, calls for IENWG considering how EU Directive on Marine Equipment could
tenders and proposals, projects, events, etc., foster the requirement that software-based equipment such as ECDIS be
potentially impacting HOs and to define actions updated to the latest version of the relevant standards.
to be conducted in accordance
HOs of EU/EEA have liaised with their relevant administration to make
sure that the question of ECDIS maintenance is at the agenda of
the next Maritime Equipment Expert Group
(http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupD
etail.groupDetail&groupID=2653). This question has not yet been
raised at the MED expert group.
C-22
SCRUM/TSCOM REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of ……SCRUM/TSCOM
Compiled by …Martin Jakobsson, Karen Marks… - e-mail address:…
[email protected],
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that may Any amplifying comments
prevent completion of tasks on time
Request Scripps Oceanographic Institution to In progress
release SRTM15 to GEBCO for incorporation into
the GEBCO Grid. (GGC32-07) Jakobsson, Tani
Appoint new Science Day convener GGC32-23 Completed Tim Kearns and Jaya Roperez accepted Joint
Appointment
Appoint a Vice-Chair for the TSCOM GGC32-10 In progress
Marks
Release article for GEBCO_2014 Completed Published in AGU’s Earth and Space Science,
Aug. 2015, DOI: 10.1002/2015EA000107
Post formal recognition and thanks to Science Day Completed Formal recognition of Paul Elmore posted on
Convener on GEBCO website GGC32-25 Marks, GEBCO website under News and Events
Weatherall
Joint TSCOM/SCRUM Meeting Oct. 2015 Completed Held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Oct. 2015
Joint TSCOM/SCRUM Meeting Oct. 2016 Organize meeting and preparation Valparaiso, Chile Oct. 2016
GEBCO Science Day 2015 Completed Held in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Oct. 2015
Planning of Arctic and Antarctic mapping meeting Ongoing Meeting/workshop potential participants are
in Monaco, June 12-13 invited. This is a coordinated IBCAO/IBCSO
activity
C-23
SCUFN REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of ……GEBCO/SCUFN
Compiled by …Hans Werner Schenke - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Principal goals or priorities for your group Current or expected gaps and needs that Any amplifying comments
may prevent completion of tasks on time
Conducting the annual SCUFN-Meeting None 12 – 16 Oct 2015 Niteroi, SCUFN-28 Report is available
Membership monitoring.
Development of S-100 Product Specification for Coordination between stakeholders and Should be put on the agenda SCUFN-29. Canada
UFN subject matter experts. Need to establish a volunteered to lead the action.
realistic roadmap prior to any UFN
database modelling.
Maintenance and improvement of the GEBCO Under work by IHB and NOAA/NCEI. Definition of the geometric primitives for all undersea
Gazetteer feature, monitoring of pending names, quality control of
Maintenance of the Gazetteer interface in
the database, interface with other geospatial portals.
the future to be discussed at SCUFN-29 as
NOAA/NCEI not sure to be able to
continue its support.
Promotion on SCUFN-activities in international Publication is under prep. Publication of new developments and web-applications in
periodicals undersea feature nomenclature
Development of an experimental fast-track Role and responsibilities of national none
procedure to review “already-chartered and geographical boards in their waters under
named” undersea features national jurisdiction.
C-24
SRWG REPORT
Overall status of the work programme of SRWG
Compiled by: Andrew Millard - e-mail address:
[email protected]
Current goals and priorities Current or expected gaps and needs Comments
In accordance with ToR of the SRWG:
Review proposed revised draft regulation Revised draft regulations received from the
President on 22 November 2015.
Review implementation plan SRWG met by telephone conference and provide
our comments back to the President on 4 January
Review proposed job descriptions for directors 2016.
under new structure We are waiting to hear back on these comments.
The President informed me on 30 January 2016
that travel commitments was causing a delay in his
response but hopefully we will be able to move to
an agreed regulation document and job
descriptions by the end of April 2016 in
accordance with the revised timetable agreed
between the President and SRWG
C-25
Annex D to IHO CL 14/2016
MEMBER STATES’ RESPONSES TO IHO CL 66/2015
ARGENTINA
In this regard, we agree with the need to realize periodic analysis with the identification of priority areas,
but due to the working dynamic work of this Hydrographic Office, we believe that it is not convenient to
require status reports on a biannual basis. Those WG and CHR wishing to provide information that they
consider important could do so at their discretion, notwithstanding the current annual cycle.
CHILE
We appreciate very much the decision of the IHB DC to circulate the comments we offered as an answer to
CL 7/2015, comments that we strongly continue to support, particularly after considering again the low
level of response and the content of the Reports.
Other information provided in the Reports, do not necessarily identify gaps and problems or needs or do
not offer any information requiring action from MSs. Therefore the value doesn’t seem to be contributing
to improve the management of the IHO.
MAURITIUS
Mauritius is agreeable to the report on the overall status of the IHO work programme mid- year 2015.
NIGERIA
The Office (NNHO) is of the opinion that quarterly reporting process should be adopted which is to be
followed up with monthly reminder through mail so that Member States will make it a top priority.
SPAIN
The IHM supports the usefulness of biannual reports on Hydrographic Commissions, Committees, Sub-
Committees and Working Groups, as we consider that close monitoring on their activities is required for
them to be successful.
SWEDEN
In general we agree with the conclusion made by Chile and their analysis on the low rate of responses in
regard to the increased workload.
However, we would like to look at this from a slightly different point of view.
The RHCs often have their own work plans and meetings once per year or every second year. At the RHC
meetings MS as well as the RHC working groups report the progress within the RHC. Many of the
activities in the RHCs, which Sweden is a part of, are reported at the RHC meetings. Considering the few
inputs received from RHCs to the IHO Directing Committee, we find that many answers describe long term
issues and often in general terms. This could be a sign that a biannually reporting regime might be to
overdo it - in the case of RHCs.
However, we believe that the bodies within IHO, that addresses common challenges and follow common
decided work plans with clear milestones of strategic interest for every MS, could benefit of the biannually
reporting regime (IRCC and HSSC with their Sub organs, GEBCO, ABLOS, etc.).
Sweden therefore proposes:
- that RHCs report annually
- that IHO bodies and sub organs report biannually
D-1
Annex D to IHO CL 14/2016
UNITED KINGDOM
The UK supports the suggestion by Canada for IHO deadlines to be included in the IHO Calendar of
Events posted on the IHO web site. We are concerned that only 4 of the 15 Regional Hydrographic
Commissions responded to the Report. Highlighting IHO deadlines in the IHO Calendar of Events will help
to improve the engagement by Regional Hydrographic Commissions but further suggestions for
improvements to RHC engagement from Member States and the IHB would also be of benefit.
D-2