Sissetulev kiriAvalik
Selgitustaotlus
Rahapesu Andmebüroo · 19. oktoober 2021
- Viit
- 6-3/364-1
- Registreeritud
- 19. oktoober 2021
- Dokumendi liik
- Sissetulev kiri
- Adressaat
- Prospectacy Ltd
- Saabumis/saatmisviis
- e-post
- Funktsioon
- 6 MAJANDUSTEGEVUSE LOA TAOTLUSTE LAHENDAMINE JA SOBIVUSMENETLUSED
- Sari
- 6-3 Kirjavahetus majandustegevuse lubade menetluses
- Toimik
- 6-3/2021
- Vastutaja
- Struktuurüksus on tunnistatud asutusesiseseks kasutamiseks (alus: RahaPTS § 53 lg 4)
- Lahendamise tähtaeg
- 18. november 2021
Sisu (failidest)
Saatja: Olga Mazure <[email protected]>
Saadetud: 19.10.2021 12:41
Adressaat: RAB rahapesu <[email protected]>
Teema: FW: Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act
Manused: image001.jpg
Dear Sir/Madam
I am Olga Mazure from the company Prospectacy Ltd, we are representing interests of the company P.H
Primary OU.
The company P.H. PRIMARY OÜ (reg. 16046808) has received the online gaming license with Estonian
Tax and Customs Board (P.H. PRIMARY OÜ, reg. 16046808). We have questions regarding meaning of
AML legislation, could you please assist us?
1. We would like to clarify the meaning of Article mentioned Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
Prevention Act
According to the Chapter 3 DUE DILIGENCE MEASURES
Article (3) A gambling operator applies due diligence measures at least upon payment of winnings,
making of a bet or on both occasions where the sum given or receivable by the customer is at least 2000
euros or an equal sum in another currency, regardless of whether the pecuniary obligation is performed
in a lump sum or by way of several linked payments over a period of up to one month.
Is this article applicable to the online casino also?
According our procedure the customer has to pass identification process before the registration of the
account with the gaming operator. During Due Diligence process we identify the customer, receiving the
information regarding the residence address, checking the customer in the PEP /Sanction list.
The client can make deposit only with his own credit card and the withdrawal can be made on the same
account from which the deposit was done.
Should we made the additionally proof of his identity when the player make deposit or withdrawal in
amount 2000 EUR?
2. Regarding requests of source of funds. We are thinking to ask documents proving of source of funds if
the customer made a deposit in amount 10 000 EUR or more during one month period, regardless of
whether the customer did one transaction or more linked transactions. Could you please advise can we
apply this approach?
Best regards,
Olga Mazure | Licensing Specialist
26 Lordou Vyronos Ave.
1096 Nicosia, Cyprus
Tel: +357 22 255 335 | Fax: +357 22 255 330 | Skype : olga.mazure