TEN-T projektide kinnitamine

Information source(s) Name of information source Ref N° in information source Name of document / study, data base, data e.g. CEF Project N° provider,… NEW COLUMN Free text Free text  Responsibility for data gathering CNC consortium name Company name This column contains the consortium This column contains the company responsible for data gathering in case that dedicated for carrying out check, collection the project is allocated to one or more and completion or modification of project corridors: data set (this will be the respective task 2 Baltic-Adriatic, North Sea-Baltic, leader or another partner to be appointed Mediterranean, Orient-East Med, within a consortium). Scandinavian – Mediterranean, Rhine- Alpine, Atlantic, North Sea-Mediterranean, [TO BE FILLED BY TASK 2 WG AND Rhine-Danube RESPECTIVE CONSORTIUM] [TO BE FILLED BY TASK 2 WORKING GROUP (WG)] NEW COLUMN NEW COLUMN Dropdown Free text [TO BE FILLED BY TASK 2 WORKING GROUP [TO BE FILLED BY TASK 2 WG AND (WG)] RESPECTIVE CONSORTIUM] Baltic-Adriatic North Sea-Baltic  Mediterranean Orient-East Med Scandinavian - Mediterranean Rhine-Alpine Atlantic North Sea-Mediterranean Rhine-Danube  Project Identification TEN-T Project ID Project name Project category Unique project ID for all corridors; Short name or title (not only an According tender specifications, p. details i.e. regarding code acronym) to identify the measure 17: structure, allocation procedure (1) rail (acc. Reg. 1315, art. 11 with and tools will be defined at a later exception to ERTMS; (2) Rail stage ERTMS (acc. Reg. 1315, art. 3(l); (3) Inland waterway (IWW; acc. Reg. 1315, art. 14; (4) Road (acc. [TO BE FILLED BY TASK 2 WG] Reg. 1315, art. 17); (5) Maritime (acc. Reg. 1315, art. 20); (6) Motorways of the Sea (MoS; acc. Reg. 1315, art. 21); (7) Airport (acc. Reg. 1315, art. 24); (8) Multimodal (acc. Reg. 1315, art. 27); (9) Innovation (acc. Reg 1315, art. 31, 32 and 33 of the TEN-T Regulation, EXPLANATIONwith exception ADDED to Leave free (allocation of unique Free text Dropdown project ID will be coordinated at a later stage) Rail Rail ERTMS  IWW Road Maritime MoS Airport Multimodal Innovation Other dentification TEN-T Project promoter Project origin North Sea-Baltic Mediterranean Baltic-Adriatic also: "Implementation body" According tender specifications, p. Indicate the corridors that are touched by the project.Hori 17: Reference for all records on any corridor. Mark with Authority, institution or company the list whether the individual responsible for implementing the project included has been project, e.g. infrastructure submitted by a stakeholder OR is a manager for building a rail line result of analysis of a relevant national strategic document OR is a result of the analysis of the sections currently not compliant with the TEN-T requirements but not covered by any infrastructure investment planning until 2030. EXPLANATION ADDED 'Horizont Free text Dropdown Mark with 'x' (mul Submitted by a stakeholder Result of analysis of a relevant national strategic document  Result of the analysis of the sections currently not compliant with the TEN-T requirements but not covered by any infrastructure investment planning until 2030.  Geographical scope & affected mode TEN-T Corridor Member States / Countries involved (not allocated to any corridor) Scandinavian-Mediterranean North Sea-Mediterranean Horizontal project Orient-East Med Rhine-Danube Rhine-Alpine Atlantic ridors that are touched by the project.Horizontal projects summarise all projects that are not related to Alpha-2 country code any corridor. Mark with x (multi selection possible) (acc. ISO 3166-1) 'Horizontal' ADDED Mark with 'x' (multi selection possible) Free text - country code(s) BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE EL ES FR HR IT CY LV LT LU HU MT NL AT PL PT RO SI SK FI SE UK EU-28 & affected mode Section or node Cross-border section Last-mile section Pre-identified CEF section / project Enter the name of Indicate if project is Indicate if project refers Indicate if project Section, Station, located on cross-border to the "development of refers to CEF pre- terminal section; apply definition the comprehensive identified section or border crossing, etc. of Reg. 1315: "'cross- network in urban nodes node; refer to CEF (free text) border section' means ... that are the starting regulation . the section which point or the final ensures the continuity destination ("last mile") (Mark with 'x') of a project of common for passengers and interest between the freight moving on the nearest urban nodes on TEN-T network..."; refer both sides of the border to Reg. 1315, Article 30. of two Member States or between a Member (Mark with 'x') State and a neighbouring country." Free text Mark with 'x' Mark with 'x' Mark with 'x'  Project description Scope of w Short Project Description Infrastructure works - rehabilitation Study Describe objectives and scope of measure e.g. introduction of RIS, ERTMS, Mark with x apart from telematics application (Dropd rail line electrification, upgrade one to dual track. Indicate qualitative or quantitative information regarding socio-economic and environmental impacts of projects, if applicable. Indicate quantifiable parameters e.g. length of project, number of stations,…. (Free text) Free text Mark with Mark with 'x' 'x'  Project description Scope of work (multi selection) (according Reg. 1315, Article 32; excluding Clean fuels (IWW/Maritime, Road, Air) Sustainable freight transport services (according Reg. 1315, Article 31) Maintenance equipment (IWW) Rolling Stock, Vehicles, Barges Administrative procedures Telematics application Infrastructure works Infrastructure works - new construction KPI: Electrification - upgrade MoS) k with x apart from telematics application (Dropdown); Multiselection possible Dropdown list: (1) KPI target achieved (2) KPI improved; this applies if the TEN-T target valu project have been upgraded to the 'KPI: Track gauge 1435 mm': Only t gauge lines that are modified to 1, Modifie ERTMS Input d added KPI WG Mark with Mark with Mark with Mark with Mark with Mark with Drop- Mark with Dropdown 'x' 'x' 'x' 'x' 'x' 'x' down 'x' for all KPIs ERTMS KPI target achieved RIS KPI improved  ITS VTMIS SESAR OTHER  Rail KPI: Axle load >= 22.5 tonnes (Core freight KPI: Line speed >= 100 km/h (Core freight Elimination of current or potential future KPI: Train length >= 740m (Core freight Elimination of strong incline KPI: ERTMS implementation KPI: Track gauge 1435 mm capacity bottleneck lines) lines) lines) Dropdown list: Further parameters linked to the projects' (1) KPI target achieved elimination of bottlenecks. (2) KPI improved; this applies if the TEN-T target value has not been achieved or if only sections of the (Mark with 'x') project have been upgraded to the TEN-T target value. 'KPI: Track gauge 1435 mm': Only to be considered for new lines or broad/narrow gauge lines that are modified to 1,435 mm. Input Input Input Input Input NEW NEW KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Mark with 'x' Mark with 'x'  Contribution to corridor objectives (KPI) and elimination of bottlenecks IWW Road Contribution to good navigation status Removal of single track section KPI: Express road/ motorway KPI: RIS implementation KPI: Draught >= 2.5m KPI: ECMT class >= IV KPI: Height >= 5.25m arameters linked to the projects' Dropdown list: on of bottlenecks. (1) KPI target achieved (2) KPI improved; th 'x') this applies if the TEN-T target value has not been achieved or if only sections of the project have been upgraded to Definitions IWW: Good navigation status (according Reg. 1315, §15, 3b): Percentage of days per year, on which the fairway meets the minimum requirements for fairway depth and width. (Definition to be refined by the complementary study on the good navigation status.) 'KPI: Capability of handling intermodal units': Technical and operational capability to transship lorries, trailers, semi- road. 'KPI: 740m train terminal accessibility': Suitability of at least one receiving/departing track and at least one transship 'KPI: Electrified train terminal accessibility': Suitability to enter or leave the receiving/departing track and the transsh NEW Input Input Input Input NEW Input KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG Mark with 'x' Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Mark with 'x' Drop-down ives (KPI) and elimination of bottlenecks Road Airport Seaport KPI: ECMT Class IV waterway connection KPI: Facilities for ship generated waste KPI: Availability of clean fuels KPI: Availability of clean fuels KPI: Availability of clean fuels KPI: Connection to rail KPI: Connection to rail y sections of the project have been upgraded to the TEN-T target value. um requirements for fairway depth and width. avigation status.) nal capability to transship lorries, trailers, semi-trailers with or without tractor unit, swap bodies or containers of 20 feet suitable for intermodal transp eiving/departing track and at least one transshipment track to accommodate trains with a length of 740 m, without splitting the train. ve the receiving/departing track and the transshipment track(s) directly with electric main line locomotive, without using shunting locomotives. Input Input Input Input Input Input Input KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down  Inland port RR terminals KPI: Capability of handling intermodal units KPI: Electrified train terminal accessibility KPI: ECMT Class IV waterway connection KPI: 740m train terminal accessibility KPI: Availability of clean fuels KPI: Connection to rail tainers of 20 feet suitable for intermodal transport according to Directive 92/106/EC between rail and 0 m, without splitting the train. tive, without using shunting locomotives. Input Input Input Input Input Input KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG KPI WG Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down Drop-down  Maturity by reference time Reference time for Planning stage / Preliminary project Environmental Impact information pre-feasibility analysis/ Feasibility Assessment (EIA) / Detailed studies / Strategic studies Design / Detailed Environmental Implementation Plan / Assessment (SEA) Administrative Permits and Licences MM/YYYY SEA added Enter reference month Dropdown Dropdown Dropdown [MM/YYYY] or date [DD.MM.YYYY] 08/2005 not started not started not started in progress in progress in progress concluded concluded concluded  Project status ence time Construction/ Project Project end date implementation (% of start date completion) Project start date of Project end date of study or works; if study or works; if project includes project includes study & works, study & works, project start date is project end date is equal to finalisation equal to start of time of works. works. Format: MM/YYYY Format: MM/YYYY If start month is not If start month is not known, fill in known, fill in 00/YYYY. 00/YYYY. Explanation & Explanation & Format added Format added To be calculated Date [MM/YYYY] Date [MM/YYYY] automatically between start date and end date, related to the Reference time for information 08/2010  Project status Administrative implementation Implementation strategy Land acquisition Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Indicate if project part of larger investment implemented per phases (describe rationale underpinning identification of phases and time horizon for total project completion i.e. 2020- 2030, after 2030) Free text Dropdown Dropdown Completed EIA under preparation or updating Not completed EIA completed EIA approved Administrative implementation issues Final project approval by CBA State existing bilateral or Source of costs / relevant governmental & multilateral agreements financing administrative authorities and any other information administrative implementation issue. According Tender specifications, page 13: For information on the cost of all projects, the source of information shall be indicated: Stakeholder, Member States, Strategic document Description modified EXPLANATION MODIFIED Dropdown Dropdown Free text Dropdown not submitted yet Performed Stakeholder submitted, decision pending Not performed Member State approved Strategic document Total costs Explanation of Project with Explanation on Expenditures until project costs potential revenues potential revenues reference time of information Amount in Describe differences Mark projects that If previous column Amount in Million Euro of cost figure might generate (Project with Million Euro (1) without VAT, (2) compared to revenues after potential revenues) without extra standard (without completion. is marked with 'x' , budget for risks and VAT, without extra provide further (3) at present budget for risks, at details regarding prices. present prices). nature of revenues and figures. In case of differences to this standard cost calculation, an explanation of project costs shall be provided in next column. EXPLANATION NEW COLUMN NEW COLUMN NEW COLUMN ADDED Amount in Million Free text Mark with 'x' Free text Amount in Euro Million Euro  Project costs/financing** Funding source Funding source Funding source Amount in Funding Indicate Amount in Funding Indicate Amount in Million Euro programme potential or Million Euro programme potential or Million Euro name approved name approved funding funding Amount in Free text Dropdown Amount in Free text Dropdown Amount in Million Euro Million Euro Million Euro potential potential approved approved Funding source Funding source Funding source Fundig Indicate Amount in Funding Indicate Amount in Funding programme potential or Million Euro programme potential or Million Euro programme name e.g. TEN- approved name approved name T funding, funding funding ERDF, CEF,… Dropdown Dropdown Amount in Free text Dropdown Amount in Free text Million Euro Million Euro ERDF potential potential CEF approved approved ... Funding source Funding source Remarks Indicate Amount in Funding Indicate Remarks potential or Million Euro programme potential or approved name approved funding funding e.g. information on potential technical, physical, political or financial constraints Dropdown Amount in Free text Dropdown Million Euro potential potential approved approved  Project Identification Project name Project Project Project origin category promoter Free text Dropdown Free text Dropdown  Geographical scope & affected mode TEN-T Corridor Member States / Section or node Cross- Last-mile Pre- Countries involved border section identifie (not allocated to any Horizontal project section d Orient-East Med North Sea-Baltic Mediterranean Mediterranean Mediterranean CEF Rhine-Danube Scandinavian- Baltic-Adriatic Rhine-Alpine section / North Sea- project Atlantic Mark with 'x' (multi selection possible) Enter only country Free text Mark Mark Mark code(s) with 'x' with 'x' with 'x'  Short Project Description Free text h Project description rk 'x' Study Infrastructure works k 'x' - rehabilitation Infrastructure works k 'x' - upgrade Infrastructure works k 'x' - new construction Maintenance k 'x' equipment (IWW) Rolling Stock, Vehicles, k 'x' Barges Clean fuels k 'x' (IWW/Maritime, Road, Administrative Scope of work (multi selection) k 'x' wit with with with with with with with procedures Telematics application n dow (according Reg. 1315, Sustainable freight k 'x' with transport services n KPI: Electrification KPI: Track gauge 1435 n mm KPI: ERTMS n implementation KPI: Line speed >= 100 n km/h (Core freight lines) KPI: Axle load >= 22.5 n Rail tonnes (Core freight KPI: Train length >= n dow dow dow dow dow dow 740m (Core freight Elimination of current k 'x' or potential future Elimination of strong k 'x' incline Removal of single track k 'x' section KPI: ECMT class >= IV KPI: Draught >= 2.5m KPI: Height >= 5.25m IWW KPI: RIS implementation Contribution to good 'x' navigation status KPI: Express road/ motorway Road KPI: Availability of clean with with with wn wn wn wn with wn wn Ma Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Mar Drop Mar Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Drop Mar Mar Mar Dro Dro Dro Dro Mar Dro Dro pdo pdo pdo pdo k pdo pdo fuels Contribution to corridor objectives (KPI) and elimination of bottlenecks  KPI: Connection to rail KPI: Availability of clean Airport fuels KPI: Connection to rail KPI: ECMT Class IV r objectives (KPI) and elimination of bottlenecks waterway connection KPI: Availability of clean wn wn wn wn wn Seaport fuels KPI: Facilities for ship generated waste KPI: ECMT Class IV waterway connection KPI: Connection to rail Inland port KPI: Availability of clean fuels KPI: Capability of handling intermodal KPI: 740m train terminal accessibility KPI: Electrified train RR terminals wn wn wn wn wn wn Dro Dro Dro Dro Dro Drop Dro Dro Dro Dro Dro Dro pdo pdo pdo pdo pdo down pdo pdo pdo pdo pdo pdo terminal accessibility  Project status Maturity by reference time Administrative implementation issues Reference Planning stage / Preliminar Environmental Impact Construction/ Project Project Implementation strategy Land Environm Final project CBA State existing bilateral time for pre-feasibility y project Assessment (EIA) / implementation (% start date end date acquisitio ental approval by or multilateral informatio studies / analysis/ Detailed Design / of completion) n Impact relevant agreements and any n Strategic Feasibility Detailed Assessme governmental & other administrative Environmental studies Implementation Plan / nt (EIA) administrative implementation issue. Assessment Administrative Permits authorities (SEA) and Licences Enter Dropdown Dropdown Dropdown To be calculated Date Date Free text Dropdow Dropdow Dropdown Dropdow Free text reference automatically [MM/YYY [MM/YYY n n n month between start date Y] Y] [MM/YYY and end date, Y] or date related to the [DD.MM.Y Reference time for YYY] information  Project costs/financing** Project with potential revenues Source of Total costs Explanatio Explanation on Expendit costs / n of potential revenues ures until financing project reference informatio costs time of n informati on Dropdown Amount in Free text Mark Free text Amount Million with 'x' in Euro Million Euro  Project costs/financing** Funding source"State" Funding source"Regional/Local" Funding source"EU" Funding source"IFI" Funding source"Private" Funding source"Other" Remarks Amount Funding Indicate Amount Funding Indicate Amount Fundig Indicate Amount Funding Indicate Amount Funding Indicate Amount Funding Indicate Remarks in Million program potential in Million program potential in Million programme potential in Million program potential in Million program potential in Million program potential Euro me name or Euro me name or Euro name e.g. or Euro me name or Euro me name or Euro me name or approved approved TEN-T approved approved approved approved funding funding funding, funding funding funding funding ERDF, CEF,… Amount Free text Dropdow Amount Free text Dropdow Amount Free text Dropdow Amount Free text Dropdow Amount Free text Dropdow Amount Free text Dropdow in n in n in n in n in n in n Million Million Million Million Million Million Euro Euro Euro Euro Euro Euro x Sections belonging to several corridors: which contractor does data encoding - Warsaw-Lodz (rail) - Warsaw node - Prerov node - Zilina node Baltic-Adriatic - Brno-Vienna - Padova-Ravenna (rail) - Bologna node, Venice node - Adriatic ports (Koper, Trieste, Venice, Ravenna) - Warsaw-Lodz (road) - Lodz node - Poznan node North Sea-Baltic - Berlin node - Bremen-Bremerhaven/Wilhelmshaven - Amsterdam-Utrecht - Pragersko-Padova - Inland waterway to Ravenna Mediterranean - Algeciras-Madrid - Madrid node, Milano node, Ljubljana node - Brno-Bratislava - Hamburg-Dresden (inland waterways) Orient/East-Med - Prag-Brno - Budapest-BG border - Helsinki node - Hamburg/Bremen – Hannover Scandinavian-Mediterranean - Rostock-Berlin - Verona node - Rhine - Amsterdam-Rhine Kanaal (inland waterways) Rhine-Alpine - Antwerpen-Köln - Rechtsrheinisch - Mannheim node, Novara node - Metz-Strasbourg Atlantic - Strasbourg node - Rotterdam-Antwerpen - Inland waterways south of Rotterdam North Sea-Mediterranean - Lyon-Marseille - Linksrheinisch - Paris node  - Budapest node, Wien node, Bratislava node - Wien-Bratislava-Budapest Rhine-Danube - Würzburg-Nürnberg - München node NB: “node” covers the relevant inland ports, seaports, airports and rail-road terminals. Where not indica  x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Baltic-Adriatic x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x North Sea-Baltic x x x x x x x x x x Mediterranean x x x x x x x x x x Orient-East Med x x x x x x x x x Scandinavian- Mediterranean TEN-T Corridor x x x x x x x x x x Rhine-Alpine x x x x x x x x x Atlantic  x x x x x x x erminals. Where not indicated differently, links are to be considered multimodal. x x x x x x x x x x North Sea- Mediterranean x x x x x x x x x Rhine-Danube x x x x Saatja: Martin Malinovski <[email protected]> Saatmisaeg: 17. veebruar 2016. a. 14:32 Adressaat: VA_eva Teema: FW: TEN-T projektide kinnitamine Manused: CNC_Project-List_EST_VTA.xlsx From: Martin Malinovski Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 2:15 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: TEN-T projektide kinnitamine Tere! Ernst & Young viib Euroopa Komisjoni tellimusel l�bi TEN-T transpordikoridoridega seotud uuringut. Tegemist on rahvusvahelise projektiga, milles Eesti kontekstis tegeleme P�hjamere-Balti transpordikoridorile j��vate Eesti projektide kaardistamisega ja Euroopa Komisjoni poolt etteantud andmetabeli t�itmisega. Saime Teie kontakti Majandus- ja Kommunikatsiooniministeeriumi n�unikult Anti Moppelilt. Tegeleme hetkel potentsiaalsete TEN-T transpordikoridoriga seotud projektide kaardistamisega ning sooviksime saada Teilt kinnitust ka Veeteede Ameti projektidele: 1. New icebreaker for Gulf of Finland (both sides) 2. Reconstruction of Hundipea Port (Icebreakers and other safety support fleet, navigation aid) Seoses sellega palun kinnitust, kas eelnimetatud projektid on aktuaalsed, asjakohased ja nende ingliskeelsed nimetused korrektsed? Samuti palun kinnitada, kas toodud projektide loetelu on ammendav v�i on Teil kavandamisel ka teisi projekte, mis vajavad TEN-T kontekstis v�ljatoomist. Teie poolne huvi v�iks seisneda selles, et info projektide kohta j�uab Euroopa Komisjoni liikuvuse ja transpordi peadirektoraati (DG MOVE), kus v�etakse kaardistatud projeke arvesse kui potentsiaalseid abik�lblikke TEN-T transpordikoridoridega seotud projekte. Praeguses etapis peame Euroopa Komisjonile esitama aktuaalsete projektide nimekirja, mist�ttu paluksin kinnitada teie projektide nimekiri esimesel v�imalusel. Lisaks sellele peame j�rgmises etapis t�itma projektide kohta Komisjoni poolt etteantud tabeli (lisatud manuses). Ka selleks vajame Teie sisendit, kuid sellega on m�nev�rra rohkem aega. K�ikide k�simuste korral v�tta julgelt �hendust. T�nud ette! Tervitades / Best regards, Martin Malinovski | Advisory Services | Consultant Ernst & Young Baltic AS R�vala pst. 4, Tallinn 10143, Estonia Direct: +372 611 4537 | Mobile: +372 5345 3858 | [email protected] Office: +372 611 4610 | Fax: +372 611 4611 | EY/Comm: **372 34537 Website: http://www.ey.com/ee ___________________________________ The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. EY is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.