ITU BRIFIC

From: "BRTPR, ITU" <[email protected]> Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:42:59 +0000 To: "BRMAIL, ITU" <[email protected]> Cc: "BRTPR_DP, ITU" <[email protected]> Subject: FW: Modifications to the Plans, GE06 Good morning, Please for registration. Thank you Ben From: Endrik Kriisa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 July 2016 9:21 AM To: BRTPR, ITU <[email protected]> Subject: Modifications to the Plans, GE06 Dear Sir/Madam, Estonia has sent new (ADD) GE06 Plan allotments for notification which were published in part A of BR IFIC 2812/114 dated 02.02.2016. Do I understand it correctly, that to publish those Plan modifications in part B, the allotments technical characteristics has to be unchanged from those in part A? (4.1.4.14 If, in seeking agreement, an administration modifies its initial proposal, it shall again apply the provisions of § 4.1.) It might be possible that Estonia has to change the reference network from RN1 to RN2 to get agreements from all affected countries. That would cause an decrease of possible interference to other Plan entries. Therefore I ask for your comments whether the change (RN2 instead of RN1) would cause the need to suppress the current notification and to send a new one or Estonia can send directly for part B including that change? Best Regards, Endrik Kriisa Chief Specialist of Frequency Management Department (+372) 667 2131| [email protected] | www.tja.ee Technical Regulatory Authority Sõle 23A, 10614 Tallinn, Estonia 6-017815 1 8/07/2016--- ---3 1B(BCD)I-201 Saatja: Castro, Juan Luis <[email protected]> Saaja: Endrik Kriisa, BRMAIL, ITU, BRBCD, ITU Teema: RE: BR Ref.: 31B(BCD)O-2016-002760 - Re: Modifications to the Plans, GE06 Dear Endrik, The first step for the change of Reference Network from RN1 to RN2 is to submit GT2s with the new RN parameter, making sure that “t_is_pub_req” is set to “True” (this avoids you having to send TB3s once you get all the agreements). Please, note that in the new GT2s you should also keep the original Intent parameter as it was (in this case “t_action” set to “ADD”) As for the coordination, being a minor change, the coordination agreements that you have so far are kept, i.e. you don’t need to coordinate again with administrations that have already agreed. For administrations who have objected to RN1 they should inform the Bureau that they agree with the change from RN1 to RN2. Finally, for administrations who have not answered you have two options: - You coordinate with them directly and they send us their decisions (we will update the database accordingly). - You make use of provision 4.1.4.10 and request the Bureau to send reminders to all administrations who have not given an answer yet. After 40 days from the day of our letter those Administration who did not answer it is assumed that they have agreed. I hope this clarifies. I am at your disposal for any further assistance you might need Best regards, Juan Castro From: Endrik Kriisa [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 10:41 AM To: Castro, Juan Luis <[email protected]> Subject: RE: BR Ref.: 31B(BCD)O-2016-002760 - Re: Modifications to the Plans, GE06 Dear Juan Castro, Thank you for the quick reply. Some questions regarding the next steps: - Get the agreements from all affected administrations with the new Reference Network and submit them to the Bureau. - Resubmit the concerned notices with the new reference network making sure that the data item “t_is_pub_req” is set to “True” (publication in Part B) Does it mean that Estonia has to coordinate the changes directly with affected administrations and send a new notification to ITU (GT2? TB3?) listed with all coordinated administrations (t_adm)? Or is it necessary that those administrations that have not send any comments or objected to the current notification (in part A) to send their agreements to ITU stating that they agree only with RN2 instead of RN1? Best regards, Endrik Kriisa From: Castro, Juan Luis [mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 3:47 PM To: Endrik Kriisa <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: BRMAIL, ITU <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; BRBCD, ITU <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >; TJA - Avalik <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: BR Ref.: 31B(BCD)O-2016-002760 - Re: Modifications to the Plans, GE06 Dear Madam/Sir, We thank you for your message (in attachment for your reference) regarding notices sent by the Estonian Administration and published in Part A of BR IFIC 2812/114 on 2 February 2016. In answer to your question, we inform you that, according to provision 4.1.4.14 of GE06 agreement, if you change the technical parameters of your initial notices you have to resubmit the notices. Nevertheless, after your resubmission, the Radiocommunication Bureau will check if your changes require a new publication in part A (starting the modification procedure from the beginning) or, if the changes do not increase the existing level of interference and you can ask directly for publication in Part B, provided you obtained all agreements from the affected Administrations (provisions 4.1.5.1 and 4.1.5.3) . In your case, if you are just changing the reference network from RN1 to RN2, you are not increasing the interference levels and you could proceed as follows: - Get the agreements from all affected administrations with the new Reference Network and submit them to the Bureau. - Resubmit the concerned notices with the new reference network making sure that the data item “t_is_pub_req” is set to “True” (publication in Part B) I hope this answers your question. We are at your disposal for any other clarifications you might need . Best Regards, On behalf of Mrs. Ilham GHAZI, Head, Broadcasting Division Juan CASTRO Radiocommunication Engineer, BR/TSD/BCD International Telecommunication Union Tel : +41 22 730 6374 www.itu.int <http://www.itu.int/> www.itu.int/go/RR110 <http://www.itu.int/go/RR110>