Küsimus

From : Martin Blasco , Maria Belen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday , April 05, 2016 1:27 PM To : [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Triinu Sillamaa <[email protected]>; TJA_Metroint <[email protected]>; Priit Poschlin <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected]; [email protected]; Lommatzsch Thomas <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Bisbal Martin, Javier <[email protected]> Subject : Question about CSM Dear Colleagues, I would like to ask your interpretation and opinion about the supplementary metrology marking to be aplied to CSM. Do you think that for this kind of instrument is applicable the article 22.1 regarding the following exception? "1. The CE marking and the supplementary metrology marking shall be affixed visibly, legibly and indelibly to the measuring instrument or to its data plate. Where that is not possible or not warranted on account of the nature of the measuring instrument, they shall be affixed to the accompanying documents and to the packaging, if any." One manufacturer lay out the complication to change the year of supplementary marking on CSM manufactured by injection, because this change implies an expensive modification of the mold. Until now we have rejected their explanation because we consider this does not match with the reasons for the exception on article 22.1, but we would like to know your opinion. Thank you very much in advance. Best regards, Belén Mª Belén Martín Blasco Consejera Técnica C/Alfar, 2. 28760 Tres Cantos, Madrid